Search

We consider pure exchange economies with a finite number of private goods and the choice of non-Samuelsonian public goods. For this type of economies, [5] proposed the notion of cost share equilibrium with individual payments for public goods varying according to individual benefits. This situation arises naturally when a level of provision is interpreted as a whole configuration of public policies or when cost share functions are interpreted as voluntary contributions rather than predetermined tax systems (see [31]). We establish the equivalence of cost share equilibria with cooperative and non-cooperative game-theoretic solutions: 1. we characterize cost share equilibria as those allocations which cannot be improved upon by society; 2. we characterize cost share equilibria as the Nash equilibria of a game with two players. The cooperative solutions analyzed in the paper are defined via a contribution scheme which captures the fraction of the total cost of collective goods that each coalition of agents is expected to cover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In this paper, we study average monotonic fuzzy games—a subclass of monotonic cooperative fuzzy games, and prove that for a continuous average monotonic cooperative fuzzy game which has a crisp maximal coalition of maximum excess at every imputation, its Aubin core coincides with its fuzzy bargaining set. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The goal of this paper is to provide some new cooperative characterizations and optimality properties of competitive equilibria supported by non-linear prices. The general framework is that of economies whose commodity space is an ordered topological vector space which need not be a vector lattice. The central notion of equilibrium is the one of personalized equilibrium introduced by Aliprantis et al. (J Econ Theory 100:22-72, ). Following Herves-Beloso and Moreno-Garcia (J Math Econ 44:697-706, ), the veto power of the grand coalition is exploited in the original economy and in a suitable family of economies associated to the original one. The use of Aubin coalitions allows us to connect results with the arbitrage free condition due to non-linear supporting prices. The use of rational allocations allows us to dispense with Lyapunov convexity theorem. Applications are provided in connection with strategic market games and economies with asymmetric information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Recently, the concept of classical bargaining set given by Aumann and Maschler in 1964 has been extended to fuzzy bargaining set. In this paper, we give a modification to correct some weakness of this extension. We also extend the concept of the Mas-Colell''s bargaining set (the other major type of bargaining sets) to its corresponding fuzzy bargaining set. Our main effort is to prove existence theorems for these two types of fuzzy bargaining sets. We will also give necessary and sufficient conditions for these bargaining sets to coincide with the Aubin Core in a continuous superadditive cooperative fuzzy game which has a crisp maximal coalition of maximum excess at each payoff vector. We show that both Aumann–Maschler and Mas-Colell fuzzy bargaining sets of a continuous convex cooperative fuzzy game coincide with its Aubin core. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We associate to any pure exchange economy a game with only two players, regardless of the number of consumers. In this two-player game, each player represents a different role of the society, formed by all the individuals in the economy. Player 1 selects feasible allocations trying to make Pareto improvements. Player 2 chooses an alternative from the wider range of allocations that are feasible in the sense of Aubin. The set of Nash equilibria of our game is non-empty and our main result provides a characterization of Walrasian equilibria allocations as strong Nash equilibria of the associated society game. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]