Search

Background: The health effects of alcohol consumption, particularly regarding potential protective benefits of light to moderate intake compared to abstinence, remain a subject of ongoing debate. However, epidemiological studies face limitations due to imprecise exposure measurements and the potential for bias through residual confounding and reverse causation. To address these limitations, we conducted a systematic review of Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies examining the causal relationship between alcohol consumption and cancers, cardiovascular, liver, and neurological diseases. Methodology: We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect and Embase and Europe PMC up to 05/2024 for MR studies investigating the association of genetically predicted alcohol consumption with cancers, cardiovascular, liver and neurological diseases. We assessed methodological quality based on key elements of the MR design a genetic association studies tool. Results: We included 70 MR studies that matched our inclusion criteria. Our review showed a significant association of alcohol consumption with multiple cancers such as oral and oropharyngeal, esophageal, colorectal cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma and cutaneous melanoma. While the available studies did not consistently confirm the adverse or protective effects of alcohol on other cancers, such as lung cancer, as suggested by observational studies. Additionally, MR studies confirmed a likely causal effect of alcohol on the risk of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infraction and vessels disease. However, there was no evidence to support the protective effects of light to moderate alcohol consumption on cognitive function, Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, as reported in observational studies while our review revealed an increased risk of epilepsy and multiple sclerosis. The available studies provided limited results on the link between alcohol consumption and liver disease. Conclusions: Despite the valuable insights into the causal relationship between alcohol consumption and various health outcomes that MR studies provided, it is worth noting that the inconsistent ability of genetic instrumental variables to distinguish between abstainers, light and moderate drinkers makes it difficult to differentiate between U or J-shaped vs. linear relationships between exposure and outcome. Additional research is necessary to establish formal quality assessment tools for MR studies and to conduct more studies in diverse populations, including non-European ancestries. Systematic Review Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display%5frecord.php?ID=CRD42021246154 , Identifier: PROSPERO (CRD42021246154). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the withdrawal of CB1 antagonists, such as rimonabant, from the market and from active clinical development because of concerns about their side effect profiles, research suggests that the endocannabinoid system may play an important role in modulating nicotine's effects. We report the combined results, using a pooled analysis, of three previously unpublished trials assessing rimonabant as a smoking cessation pharmacotherapy conducted between 2002 and 2004. Smokers (n = 2097) motivated to quit were enrolled in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, STRATUS EU, US, and META, which consisted of a 10-week treatment period with either rimonabant 20 mg (n = 789), 5 mg (n = 518; used in only two of the three studies), or placebo (n = 790), in conjunction with brief counseling. The impact of drug on prolonged abstinence and adverse events was examined at 8 weeks (end-of-treatment) and at 48 weeks (available for STRATUS EU and US) after the targeted quit date. Rimonabant 20 mg resulted in significantly higher abstinence at end-of-treatment and at 48 weeks post-targeted quit date compared with placebo, while rimonabant 5 mg and placebo did not differ. Serious AEs did not differ by drug group. The 20 mg rimonabant dose, compared with placebo, produced increased nausea, diarrhea, anxiety symptoms, hyporexia, and vomiting, and decreased headache, constipation, and cough. These results support rimonabant 20 mg as a modestly effective aid for smoking cessation. Although work on CB1 antagonists such as rimonabant has mostly been stopped because of unacceptable adverse events, these results may inform and spur the development of other endocannabinoids for smoking cessation.

Aims Among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), sleep disturbances are pervasive and contribute to the etiology and maintenance of AUD. However, despite increased attention toward the relationship between alcohol use and sleep, limited empirical research has systematically examined whether reductions in drinking during treatment for AUD are associated with improvements in sleep problems. Methods We used data from a multisite, randomized, controlled trial that compared 6 months of treatment with gabapentin enacarbil extended-release with placebo for adults with moderate-to-severe AUD (N  = 346). The Timeline Follow-back was used to assess WHO risk drinking level reductions and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to assess sleep quality over the prior month at baseline and the end of treatment. Results Sleep problem scores in the active medication and placebo groups improved equally. Fewer sleep problems were noted among individuals who achieved at least a 1-level reduction (B  = −0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−1.77, −0.20], P  = .014) or at least a 2-level reduction (B  = −0.80, 95% CI [−1.47, −0.14], P  = .018) in WHO risk drinking levels at the end of treatment. Reductions in drinking, with abstainers excluded from the analysis, also predicted fewer sleep problems at the end of treatment (1-level: B  = −1.01, 95% CI [−1.83, −0.20], P  = .015; 2-level: B  = −0.90, 95% CI [−1.59, −0.22], P  = .010). Conclusions Drinking reductions, including those short of abstinence, are associated with improvements in sleep problems during treatment for AUD. Additional assessment of the causal relationships between harm-reduction approaches to AUD and improvements in sleep is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Abstinence has historically been considered the preferred goal of alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment. However, most individuals with AUD do not want to abstain and many are able to reduce their drinking successfully. Craving is often a target of pharmacological and behavioral interventions for AUD, and reductions in craving may signal recovery. Whether reductions in drinking during AUD treatment are associated with reductions in craving has not been well examined. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of data from three AUD clinical trials (N's= 1327, 346, and 200). Drinking reductions from baseline to the end of treatment were measured as changes in World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking levels; alcohol craving was measured using validated self‐report measures. Regression analyses tested whether drinking reductions were associated with end‐of‐treatment craving reductions; moderation analyses tested whether associations between drinking reduction and end‐of‐treatment craving differed across AUD severity. Results: Reductions of at least 1 or at least 2 WHO risk drinking levels were associated with lower craving (all p's < 0.05). Results were substantively similar after removing abstainers at the end‐of‐treatment. Associations between drinking reductions and craving were generally not moderated by AUD severity. Conclusions: Individuals with WHO risk drinking level reductions reported significantly lower craving, as compared to those who did not achieve meaningful reductions in drinking. The results demonstrate the utility of WHO risk drinking levels as AUD clinical trial endpoints and provide evidence that drinking reductions mitigate craving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]