Search

OBJECTIVES Rituximab treatment strategies vary in ABOincompatible pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Here, we present the efficacy of 2 doses of rituximab and subsequent outcomes in ABO-incompatible pediatric kidney transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study of ABO-incompatible pediatric kidney transplant recipients included 21 who were pretreated with desensitization that included 2 doses of 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) at 10 and 1 day pretransplant and 14 who received splenectomy without rituximab (splenectomy group). Both groups received immunosuppression. Basiliximab was administered during transplant and 4 days posttransplant. Double-filtration plasmapheresis and/or plasma exchange procedures were performed pretransplant in those with higher antidonor antibody titers. CD19-positive and CD20-positive B cells were measured sequentially in the rituximab group. Maximum titers of antidonor antibody pre- and posttransplant, patient and graft survival, biopsy-proven rejection, and complications/infections were compared between groups. RESULTS In the rituximab group, CD19- and CD20-positive B cells were depleted on transplant, persistently depleted at 3 months, and under 5% until 1 year posttransplant. Maximum titers of antidonor antibodies decreased significantly posttranplant in the rituximab (P < .001) but not in the splenectomy group (P = .174), with maximum titers posttransplant significantly lower than shown in the splenectomy group (P < .001). No rituximab patients had clinical rejection, but 5 splenectomy group patients had clinical T-cell-mediated rejection, with 2 also having antibody-mediated rejection. Six in the rituximab group had cytomegalovirus viremia but no cytomegalovirus disease; however, 5 splenectomy group recipients had cytomegalovirus disease and viremia. In the rituximab group, 3 had late-onset neutropenia. One child died of hypertrophic cardio myopathy with a functioning graft; all others survived with no failed grafts. All splenectomy group children survived, although 2 had deteriorated graft function. CONCLUSIONS Two doses of rituximab were effective in long-term B-cell depletion to suppress antidonor antibodies. The possibility of late-onset neutropenia must be considered.

Extensive data have been accumulated for adults who have undergone ABO-incompatible (ABOi)-living kidney transplantation (LKT). In contrast, available published data on pediatric recipients who underwent ABOi-LKT from the early to middle 2000s is very limited. Thus, pediatric ABOi-LKT has remained relatively rare, and there is a lack of large, multicenter data.We analyzed data from the Japanese Kidney Transplant Registry to clarify the patient and graft outcomes of pediatric recipients who underwent ABOi-LKT from 2002 to 2015. A total of 102 ABOi and 788 ABO-compatible (ABOc) recipients were identified in this study. All recipients had received basiliximab and a triple immunosuppressive protocol comprising calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The ABOi recipients also received preconditioning therapies including B-cell depletion by a splenectomy or rituximab treatment and therapeutic apheresis.Death rates for ABOi and ABOc recipients were 0.17 versus 0.17 deaths per 100 patient-years. Graft loss rates for ABOi and ABOc recipients were 1.58 versus 1.45 events per 100 patient-years. No particular causes of death or graft loss predominantly affected ABOi or ABOc recipients.The results of this registry analysis suggest that pediatric ABOi-LKT can be performed efficiently. Although further studies are clearly required to perform pediatric ABOi-LKT more safely and less invasively, ABOi-LKT is now an acceptable treatment for pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease.

Background We investigated whether serum uric acid (SUA) levels before kidney transplantation predict new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) and compared SUA levels with known risk factors for NODAT by prospective cohort study. Methods A total of 151 adult kidney recipients without diabetes (84 men, 67 women) who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between 2001 and 2011 were followed in this study. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the risk of NODAT. Results During the follow-up period (median 3.3 years, range 0–10 years), 32 (21.2%) adult kidney recipients without diabetes developed NODAT, and an incidence rate was 5.6 per 100 person-years and a 10-year cumulative incidence of 26.9%. When subjects were stratified by SUA levels into tertiles, the patients in the highest tertile (> 8.6 mg/dl for men, > 7.7 mg/dl for women) had a significantly higher risk of NODAT than the patients in the lower 2 tertiles (log-rank test, P = 0.03). In the univariate analysis, increased level of SUA was associated with NODAT (hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI 1.04–1.55], P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, increased level of SUA was significantly associated with NODAT after correction by any factors, e.g. (age, sex, family history of diabetes, BMI, HbA1c, serum creatinine, tacrolimus, HCV) factors directly affecting the SUA value (1.26 [1.02–1.56], P = 0.03), risk factors for T2DM onset (1.34 [1.10–1.64], P = 0.03), and factors previously reported risk factors for NODAT (1.36 [1.11–1.66], P = 0.003). Conclusion SUA independently predicts NODAT in living-donor kidney transplantation patients.

A shortage of donors poses a serious problem for organ transplantation around the world. In response, the concept of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) has been defined to include donors with traditionally less favorable characteristics. That definition has now been accepted and is being applied in kidney transplantation in the United States and Europe. However, the ECD has not yet been defined for deceased donor kidney transplantation in Japan.We analyzed data on graft survival and relevant risk factors in patients who received deceased donor kidney transplants through the East Japan Branch of the Japan Organ Transplant network (n = 1051). Recipients were divided into two groups: the standard-function group (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥20 mL/min/1.73 mThe 10-year survival rate was significantly lower in the poor-function group than in the standard-function group (85.5% vs 22.5%; P .0001). The two groups differed significantly in recipient and donor risk for graft failure. Recipient risk factors were length of time on dialysis before renal transplantation and incidence of acute rejection after transplantation. Donor risk factors were donor category (heart death), age, history of hypertension, presence of cerebrovascular disease, mean urine output, and donor creatinine level immediately before donor nephrectomy, total ischemic time, and warm ischemic time.Data from deceased donor transplantation should be analyzed in depth to determine which factors influence renal function after transplantation. In addition, ECD standards should be reconsidered for use in a Japanese context.

Objectives We investigated outcomes in living-donor kidney transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (detected with flow cytometry and specified with the LABScreen single antigen test) under desensitization pretransplant and immunosuppression posttransplant. Materials and methods Of 15 recipients included, 8 had ABO-incompatible kidney transplant. Six patients had sensitization caused by pregnancy, 8 by blood transfusion, 5 by previous transplants, and 1 by unknown cause. Desensitization was initiated using calcineurin inhibitors, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil 30 days pretransplant, with rituximab administered 1 and 10 days pretransplant. Patients underwent plasmapheresis 1, 3, and 5 days pretransplant. Antithymocyte globulin was admi nistered for 5 days posttransplant as induction therapy. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, all recipients underwent protocol renal allograft biopsies, with donor-specific antibodies simultaneously measured with the single antigen test. Results T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative in all 15 recipients, but T-cell and B-cell flow cytometry was positive in 8 and 14 recipients, respectively. Anti-HLA class I antibodies became negative, except in 1 recipient 3 months posttransplant. Class II antibodies remained positive in 8 recipients 3 months posttransplant. No clinical or subclinical T-cell-mediated rejection occurred, but 1 recipient experienced clinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, 8 and 5 recipients had subclinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. Cytomegalovirus test showed positivity in 14 recipients, but none developed cytomegalovirus disease. BK viremia was detected in 2 recipients, with 1 developing BK virus nephropathy, which was reversed by reducing immunosuppression. Conclusions Transplant patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies showed good outcomes in terms of desensitization and immunosuppression. However, most anti-HLA class II donor-specific antibodies remained, and microvascular inflammation score could indicate long-term risk of renal allograft dysfunction.

本研究は、学校適応アセスメントの三水準モデルについて、行動的機能への介入効果が時間経過後に学業的機能・社会的機能・学校適応感に現れることを考慮し、共分散構造分析によって検証した。小学校１～６年生の児童に対し、平成26年５月及び平成27年３月に三水準モデルの各因子に関わる質問紙を実施した。なお、質問紙調査とともに、行動的機能の因子の一部である「感謝」「聴き方・話し方」「あいさつ」については、学級単位のソーシャルスキルトレーニングが実施されている。分析の結果、①行動的機能と学業的機能・社会的機能・学校適応感の間に時間差があり、②引っ込み思案行動を社会的機能に位置づけ、③学校適応感から学業的機能へのパスを追加した場合に、適合度の良い結果が得られた。したがって、行動的機能への介入効果が時間を置いて現れることや、引っ込み思案行動と社会的機能及び、学校適応感と学業的機能には、何らかの影響関係があることが考えられた。

Deceased organ donations are rare in Japan, with most kidney transplants performed from a limited number of living donors. Researchers have thus developed highly successful ABO-incompatible transplantation procedures, emphasizing preoperative desensitization and postoperative immunosuppression. A recent open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical study prospectively examined the efficacy and safety of rituximab/mycophenolate mofetil desensitization in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy. Mycophenolate mofetil and low dose steroid were started 28 days pretransplant, followed by two doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 at day −14 and day −1, and postoperative immunosuppression with tacrolimus or ciclosporin and basiliximab. The primary endpoint was the non-occurrence rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection. Patient survival and graft survival were monitored for 1 year posttransplant. Eighteen patients received rituximab and underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. CD19-positive peripheral B cell count decreased rapidly after the first rituximab infusion and recovered gradually after week 36. The desensitization protocol was tolerable, and most rituximab-related infusion reactions were mild. No anti-A/B antibody-mediated rejection occurred with this series. One patient developed anti-HLA antibody-mediated rejection (Banff 07 type II) on day 2, which was successfully managed. Patient and graft survival were both 100 % after 1 year. Our desensitization protocol was confirmed to be clinically effective and with acceptable toxicities for ABO-I-KTx (University Hospital Medical Information Network Registration Number: UMIN000006635).

How transplant nephrectomy affects patient survival after return to dialysis is unclear. Here, we compared patient survival after graft loss between patients with and without transplant nephrectomy.We divided 171 patients who received transplant between 2000 and 2015 and had graft loss into 3 groups: 64 had graft failure left in situ (without nephrectomy), 51 had nephrectomy3 months posttransplant (early nephrectomy), and 56 patients had nephrectomy3 months posttransplant (late nephrectomy). The primary endpoint was patient survival. Risk factors for patient death were also analyzed. Secondary endpoints included relisting for transplant and immunosuppressive agent status.Patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant in those without nephrectomy, early nephrectomy, and late nephrectomy were 92.1% /90.5%/86.6%, 96.0%/89.7%/80.4%, and 100.0% /97.9%/ 95.6%, respectively. Rates in patients with early nephrectomy differed significantly from those with late nephrectomy (P = .005). On multivariate analysis, patient survival was affected by relisting for transplant (hazard ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.41; P.001) and graft survival duration (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.93; P = .036). Relisting for transplant occurred in 46.9% of patients without nephrectomy, 56.9% of patients with early nephrectomy, and 51.8% of patients with late nephrectomy. Those with late nephrectomy took 14.7 months after graft loss to relist for transplant, with 7.8 months for those without nephrectomy (P = .039) and 6.3 months for those with early nephrectomy (P = .051). Only 10.9% of those without nephrectomy were immunosuppressive free, which was in contrast to 94.1% and 78.6% of those with early and late nephrectomy, respectively.After graft failure, patients without nephrectomy did not have inferior survival versus patients who received early or late nephrectomy. Graft survival time and relisting for transplant were associated with patient survival regardless of having transplant nephrectomy.

The impact of allograft nephrectomy on the outcome of a subsequent renal transplant is unclear. This study was conducted to assess the effects of the first allograft nephrectomy on outcomes of a second transplant.This study included 118 patients who received a second transplant between 1994 and 2015. Before the second transplant, 59 patients did not undergo a first allograft nephrectomy (group A). Group B comprised 59 patients who had undergone a first allograft nephrectomy. We compared sensitization, acute rejection, and survival of the second graft between groups. The risk factors of a second graft loss were assessed.The first graft survival was significantly longer in group A than in group B (100.6 vs 3.7 months; P.001). Prevalence of preformed donor-specific antibodies before the second allograft was similar between both groups (28.8% vs 39.0% for group A vs group B; P = .243). Numerically higher acute rejection rates occurred in group B than in group A (23.7% vs 15.3%; P = .245). In group A, graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.0%, 87.0%, and 82.3% and were significantly higher than for group B (76.7%, 69.1%, and 62.5%; P ⟨ .05). On multivariate analysis, survival of the second graft was affected by acute rejection (hazard ratio = 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-4.45; P = .027) and the interval from first graft loss to second transplant (hazard ratio = 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.19; P = .008).A first allograft nephrectomy was associated with inferior second graft survival. We recommend that recipients of second transplants should be considered as high risk if they had undergone prior allograft nephrectomy.