Search

Objective According to consensus guidelines, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined as a clinicopathological entity whose symptoms and histology must always be considered together. However, endoscopic findings typical of EoE are often seen in asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE). We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features of aEE. Methods We retrospectively compared cases of aEE and those of symptomatic EoE. Patients or Materials We reviewed 146 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were confirmed histopathologically to have esophageal eosinophil infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field. They were divided into the aEE group (n=75) and the EoE group (n=71). Patients' clinicopathological findings were then collected and examined. Results The EoE group experienced dysphagia (47.9%), heartburn (40.8%), food impaction (40.8%), chest pain (16.9%), and other symptoms (8.5%). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, sex, current smoking status, or alcohol consumption. The aEE group had a significantly higher body mass index (p

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an important risk factor for gastric cancer and is a recognized carcinogen. Although eradication of H. pylori reduces the incidence of gastric cancer, cases can still occur after eradication therapy. A number of such cases have been reported, and their early clinicopathological characteristics are becoming clearer. Some reports mention that endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer may be difficult after eradication therapy, because the cancer is covered by non-cancerous epithelium. However, there are few reports on advanced gastric cancer after eradication therapy, and its characteristics remain poorly understood. In view of the predicted increase in frequency of advanced gastric cancer after eradication therapy in the near future, it is important to be aware of these cases. In this report, we describe three cases of advanced gastric cancer detected during routine follow-up after eradication.

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(®) test has excellent specificity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis remains challenging, and the interpretation of QuantiFERON(®) results in immunocompromised individuals has not been fully established. Here, we present a patient with military tuberculosis who showed an indeterminate QuantiFERON(®) result. A 76-year-old male presented with fever and pancytopenia. Radiological tests did not show the classical miliary pattern. Acid-fast staining and polymerase chain reaction of several specimens were negative for M. tuberculosis. The QuantiFERON(®) responses were indeterminate on two separate tests, as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) concentration was high in the negative control. The patient did not respond to anti-microbiological therapy, and developed sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation, leading to lethal intracranial hemorrhage. An autopsy showed miliary tuberculosis and aplastic anemia. A literature review suggests a tendency towards indeterminate or false-negative QuantiFERON(®) results in immunocompromised individuals or patients with miliary tuberculosis due to low production of IFN-γ. Our patient, however, showed substantial amounts of IFN-γ despite lymphocytopenia, which has not been reported in the literature. The present case suggests that indeterminate results of QuantiFERON(®) should be interpreted with caution, as IFN-γ production in patients with miliary tuberculosis can vary significantly, even with sustained lymphocytopenia.

This article offers a description of the manuscript Tokyo, National Diet Library, Ms. WA42-29. This manuscript, purchased in London in 1987, contains Latin translations of Aristotle's logical works, some original works on logic by Boethius, and William of Moerbeke's Latin translation of De anima. It is most likely identical with a manuscript of a similar composition that disappeared in the first decades of the twentieth century from what is today the Hochschul- und Landesbibliothek Fulda. The manuscript was once part of the collection of Johannes Guldin, Domherr of Konstanz in the fifteenth century. The suggestion that this Guldin was also the author of Questiones veteris et nove logice, preserved in Stuttgart, Wurttembergische Landesbibliothek, Cod. HB X 2, turns out to be incorrect.