1. Early Surgery for Partial Tears of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament May Be More Cost-Effective and Result in Longer Playing Careers Than Nonoperative Management for High-Level Baseball Pitchers: A Decision-Analytic Markov Model-Based Analysis.
- Author
-
Oeding JF, Jurgensmeier K, Boos AM, Krych AJ, Okoroha KR, Moatshe G, and Camp CL
- Subjects
- Humans, Decision Support Techniques, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Physical Therapy Modalities economics, Athletic Injuries therapy, Athletic Injuries surgery, Athletic Injuries rehabilitation, Athletic Injuries economics, Young Adult, Male, Baseball injuries, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Markov Chains, Collateral Ligament, Ulnar injuries, Collateral Ligament, Ulnar surgery
- Abstract
Background: Nonoperative management versus early reconstruction for partial tears of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) remains controversial, with the most common treatment options for partial tears consisting of rest, rehabilitation, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and/or surgical intervention. However, whether the improved outcomes reported for treatments such as MUCL reconstruction (UCLR) or nonoperative management with a series of PRP injections justifies their increased upfront costs remains unknown., Purpose: To compare the cost-effectiveness of an initial trial of physical therapy alone, an initial trial of physical therapy plus a series of PRP injections, and early UCLR to determine the preferred cost-effective treatment strategy for young, high-level baseball pitchers with partial tears of the MUCL and with aspirations to continue play at the next level (ie, collegiate and/or professional)., Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2., Methods: A Markov chain Monte Carlo probabilistic model was developed to evaluate the outcomes and costs of 1000 young, high-level, simulated pitchers undergoing nonoperative management with and without PRP versus early UCLR for partial MUCL tears. Utility values, return to play rates, and transition probabilities were derived from the published literature. Costs were determined based on the typical patient undergoing each treatment strategy at the authors' institution. Outcome measures included costs, acquired playing years (PYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)., Results: The mean total costs resulting from nonoperative management without PRP, nonoperative management with PRP, and early UCLR were $22,520, $24,800, and $43,992, respectively. On average, early UCLR produced an additional 4.0 PYs over the 10-year time horizon relative to nonoperative management, resulting in an ICER of $5395/PY, which falls well below the $50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Overall, early UCLR was determined to be the preferred cost-effective strategy in 77.5% of pitchers included in the microsimulation model, with nonoperative management with PRP determined to be the preferred strategy in 15% of pitchers and nonoperative management alone in 7.5% of pitchers., Conclusion: Despite increased upfront costs, UCLR is a more cost-effective treatment option for partial tears of the MUCL than an initial trial of nonoperative management for most high-level baseball pitchers., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: J.F.O. has received consulting fees from Kaliber.ai. A.J.K. has received support for research from Aesculap/B.Braun; consulting fees from Arthrex, Joint Restoration Foundation, and Responsive Arthroscopy; speaking fees from Arthrex; honoraria from Joint Restoration Foundation; royalties from Arthrex and Responsive Arthroscopy; and a grant from DJO. K.R.O. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, Endo Pharmaceuticals, and Smith & Nephew; support for education from Gemini Medical, Arthrex, Endo Pharmaceutical, Pinnacle, Medwest Associates, and Zimmer Biomet; and hospitality payments from Stryker, Wright Medical Technology, and Medical Device Business Services. G.M. has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew. C.L.C. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, research support from Major League Baseball, and royalties from Springer. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF