Search

The PAX3-FOXO1 fusion protein is the key oncogenic driver in fusion positive rhabdomyosarcoma (FP-RMS), an aggressive soft tissue malignancy with a particularly poor prognosis. Identifying key downstream targets of PAX3-FOXO1 will provide new therapeutic opportunities for treatment of FP-RMS. Herein, we demonstrate that Forkhead Box F1 (FOXF1) transcription factor is uniquely expressed in FP-RMS and is required for FP-RMS tumorigenesis. The PAX3-FOXO1 directly binds to FOXF1 enhancers and induces FOXF1 gene expression. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated inactivation of either FOXF1 coding sequence or FOXF1 enhancers suppresses FP-RMS tumorigenesis even in the presence of PAX3-FOXO1 oncogene. Knockdown or genetic knockout of FOXF1 induces myogenic differentiation in PAX3-FOXO1-positive FP-RMS. Over-expression of FOXF1 decreases myogenic differentiation in primary human myoblasts. In FP-RMS tumor cells, FOXF1 protein binds chromatin near enhancers associated with FP-RMS gene signature. FOXF1 cooperates with PAX3-FOXO1 and E-box transcription factors MYOD1 and MYOG to regulate FP-RMS-specific gene expression. Altogether, FOXF1 functions downstream of PAX3-FOXO1 to promote FP-RMS tumorigenesis.

In this study, we evaluated the impacts of ad libitum feedings on outcomes following laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.Pediatric patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis who underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy were included. Patients were stratified into ad libitum and structured feeding groups. Primary outcomes were times from surgery completion to goal feeding and discharge.A total of 336 patients were included in the study with 63 patients (18.8%) in the ad libitum feeding group. The ad libitum feeding group experienced significantly shorter times from surgery completion to both goal feedings (10.7 h vs 18.7 h; p 0.001) and hospital discharge (21.6 h vs 23.1 h; p = 0.008) compared to the structured protocol group. Postoperative emesis (47.% vs 30.8%; p = 0.011) was higher in the ab libitum cohort, but the rates of return to an emergency department and/or readmission (4.8% vs 2.2%; p = 0.26) were similar.Ad libitum feeding after pyloromyotomy decreases time to reach goal feeding and hospital discharge. While it may contribute to a higher incidence of emesis, it does not appear to significantly increase hospital readmission. Ad libitum feeding appears to be a safe and beneficial alternative to structured feeding protocols following pyloromyotomy.III.