Search

Statement of Problem: The clinical success of ceramic veneers cemented with preheated composite resin has been reported to be acceptable. Although the cementing technique requires sufficient light energy to activate its polymerization, the ability of light to penetrate through ceramic restorations of different thicknesses is unclear., Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the polymerization quality and bond joint thickness of a dual-component adhesive and a heated composite resin when bonding ceramic onlays of varying thicknesses., Material and Methods: Sixty noncarious maxillary premolars, extracted for orthodontic or periodontal reasons, were divided into 6 groups (n=10) and sectioned apically to the marginal ridge. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) was used to create onlays of varying thicknesses. Following the manufacturers ' instructions, the onlays were cemented using a dual-polymerizing resin for group DP1, DP2, and DP3 groups and preheated light-polymerizing resin for groups LP1, LP2, and LP3. The numbers indicate onlay thickness in each group. Vickers testing was performed 24 hours after polymerization, with a 0.49-N static load applied for 10 seconds. Film thickness was analyzed under an optical microscope, and temperature changes were measured using a thermal imaging camera. Statistical analysis was done with the 2-factor mixed ANOVA tests (α=.05)., Results: The Vickers hardness of a dual-polymerizing cement was lower compared with heated light-polymerizing cement (P<.05). Moreover, the thickness of the resin-ceramic restoration did not significantly affect the polymerization of a dual-polymerizing cement. However, the polymerization of the preheated light-polymerizing composite resin in group LP3 was significantly lower compared with other thicknesses (P<.05). In group LP3, the Vickers hardness of the tooth adjacent to the surface of the cement (DX2) was lower compared with indentations closer to the restoration surface (DX3, DX6), demonstrating a reduction in polymerization in the internal part. In addition, the mean film thickness of the dual-polymerizing groups (96 ±18 µm) was significantly lower than of the heated light-polymerizing groups (294 ±64 µm) (P<.05). A temperature reduction of 15 °C in the heated composite resin was also observed after 8 seconds CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of the ceramic restoration did not significantly affect the polymerization of a dual-polymerizing cement. However, the polymerization of the preheated light-polymerizing composite resin under the same ceramic restoration with a thickness of 3 mm was significantly lower. In addition, the mean film thickness for the dual-polymerizing composite resin groups was significantly lower than for the heated light-polymerizing composite resin groups., (Copyright © 2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives:  Using finite element analysis (FEA), this study aimed to determine the effect of nonrigid connectors (NRCs) and their position on the success of tooth and implant-supported fixed prostheses in the maxillary posterior region., Materials and Methods:  Three three-dimensional FEA models were designed, presuming maxillary second premolar and first molar to be extracted. Implant (replacing first molar), abutment, bone (spongious and cortical), first premolar (containing dentin, root cement, gutta-percha, and casting post and core), periodontal ligament, and three three-unit cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses (a rigid one and two nonrigid) were modeled. The NRC was once on the tooth side and once on the implant side. The prostheses were loaded twice. The first molar (180 N) and premolars (120 N) teeth were subjected to progressive vertical and oblique (12-degree) loads, and maximum von Mises stress and strain in teeth and connectors were calculated for each model., Results:  The findings of the current study showed evidence that tooth-implant design with an NRC has significantly increased the average stress in the tooth. The average stress in dentin was 769.02 for the mesial connector and 766.95 for the distal connector, and this was only 731.59 for rigid connector. Furthermore, it was observed that rigid connector has considerably minimized the stress within the tooth-implant-supported fixed partial denture. The average stress for the crown and metal frame is 346.22 and 526.41 in rigid connector, while it is 1,172.9 and 2,050.9 for the nonrigid mesial connector., Conclusion:  Although distal NRC was more efficient than mesial NRC, using NRC will only reduce the stress applied to cortical bone and is not recommended in the posterior region of the maxilla., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

This umbrella review aims to evaluate systematic/meta-analysis studies containing clinical evidence on tooth grafts as bone substitutes in the oral and maxillofacial regions. Using language restrictions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, an electronic database search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was conducted, featuring published studies up until August 2022. All systematic/meta-analysis review articles relating to tooth graft materials were matched against the inclusion criteria. Two qualified researchers independently assessed the studies' inclusion or exclusion criteria and risk of bias, and a third investigator assisted in resolving ambiguities. A total of 81 systematic/meta-analysis studies, comprising 21 animal-controlled trials, 23 randomized controlled human trials, 23 prospective studies, and 14 retrospective studies, were selected for this study. A small risk of bias was observed in systematic studies/meta-analyses. In addition, the clinical evidence from the analysis of these studies revealed a low incidence of side effects. According to the current review, two systematic reviews indicated that autogenous bone grafting of prepared teeth might be as effective as other bone grafting materials. Four studies also mentioned autologous grafts as potential alternatives to autologous grafts, autogenous demineralized dentin (ADDM), engineered grafts, root blocks, and dental matrix. On the other hand, three systematic studies stated that more long-term research is needed to confirm their findings. Finally, given the importance of standardization and homogeneity of studies for clinical cases, it is advised to be used cautiously due to the risks of transplant rejection., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Long-term clinical outcomes of short dental implants (≤6 mm) supporting single crowns or short fixed partial dentures have been reported differently in different studies and need more clarification. This systematic study evaluated the rate of bone loss (BL), the durability of implants equal to or shorter than 6 mm supporting single crowns or short fixed partial dentures, and prosthetic-related side effects during 5 years of follow-up. Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were electronically and manually searched for longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of 5 years or more until January 2023. The study question was, "Does the implant equal to or shorter than 6 mm affect BL and survival rate of the implant-supported prosthesis after 5 years of follow-up?". From 752 identified articles, nine studies were selected for further evaluation. After 5 years of follow-up, most studies had more than 90% survival rate and the maximum BL was 0.54 mm. Still, in internal and external connections, these changes were not substantial. For example, screw loosening was the most common problem with implanted prostheses. Implants of 6 mm or shorter are a suitable treatment option in atrophic ridges with good durability and fewer side effects during a follow-up period of more than 5 years., Competing Interests: None declared, (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Background: Horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) is registered by protrusive interocclusal records but in nonarcon articulators, these records can affect the accuracy. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of a novel rotation coordinating device (RCD) on condylar guidance setting with protrusive interocclusal records., Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a comparative in-vitro investigation. Stone maxillary and mandibular casts were mounted on a fully adjustable instrument as the patient. Duplicate casts were mounted on an arcon and a nonarcon articulator with corresponding face bow records and in maximum intercuspation relation. Five different condylar guidance inclinations for both sides (20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°) were set on the fully adjustable instrument and 16 protrusive interocclusal records were established at each setting. HCG was set for arcon, nonarcon articulators, and nonarcon articulators with RCD. Data were analyzed using one-sample t -test to compare with actual HCG and one-way analysis of variance ( α =0.05)., Results: Mean HCG for studied articulators was 35.40 for arcon, 30.31 for nonarcon without RCD, and 35.61 for nonarcon with RCD which were significantly different from actual HCG ( P < 0.05). HCG of the nonarcon with RCD showed no significant difference with arcon articulator ( P = 0.71) while both were significantly different from nonarcon without RCD ( P < 0.001)., Conclusion: "The RCD" compensates the condylar guidance inclination difference between arcon and nonarcon articulators. The device precisely transfers the hinge movement of the upper member of the articulator to the condylar track., Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article., (Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal.)

Objective:  A durable resin/zirconia bond is essential for successful intra-oral repair of zirconia restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two mechanical treatments followed by seven chemical treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to zirconia., Materials and Methods:  In this in vitro study, 280 zirconia blocks (Y-TZP) were either air-abraded or bur roughened and divided into seven experimental groups ( n  = 20) in terms of primer/resin application: 1) ZPP, Z-Prime Plus; 2) ZPP + GP, Z-Prime Plus followed by G-premio bond; 3) ZPP + ALB, Z-Prime Plus followed by All Bond Universal; 4) ZPP + CLRF, Z-Prime Plus followed by Clearfil SE Bond; 5)GP, G-Premio Bond 6) ALB, All Bond Universal; and 7) CLRF, Clearfil SE Bond. After composite bonding and storage in distilled water (24 hours), half of each group specimen ( n  = 10) were thermocycled. All specimens were subjected to shear force. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test (α = 0.05)., Results:  Significant reduction in SBS was observed in all groups after thermocycling( p  < 0.05), except for the air-abraded ZPP + CLRF ( p  = 0.143). After aging, air-abraded CLRF exhibited the highest SBS (13.55 ± 7.8 MPa) and bur roughened ZPP showed the lowest SBS (1.16 ± 1.23 MPa). In the aged specimens, there was a significant difference between air abrasion and bur roughening in all groups ( p  < 0.05)., Conclusion:  Air-abrasion followed by application of adhesive (with/without prior primer application) is the most efficient technique for repair of veneered zirconia restorations with resin composite., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Background: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications of three-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth-implant-supported prostheses in comparison with implant-supported prostheses., Materials and Methods: In this review article, the electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, EBSCO, LIVIVO, and Embase were searched over the past 20 years until December 2021. Risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), fixed effect model, and Mantel-Haenszel method was calculated. The meta-analysis was performed with the statistical software Stata/MP v. 16., Results: Two hundred and three studies were selected for reviewing the abstracts, from which the full texts of 16 studies were reviewed. Finally, five studies were selected. The risk ratio of prosthesis failure between the tooth-implant-supported prosthesis and the implant-supported prosthesis was RR (Risk Ratio)= 1.83 (0.79, 4.24), ( P = 0.16) and for prosthesis complication, it was RR = 0.61 (0.35, 1.06), ( P = 0.08). Risk ratio of implant failure between the mentioned groups was RR = 2.33 (0.84, 6.41), ( P = 0.10), and for implant complications, this rate was 0.09 (RR, 0.09 95% CI - 1.30, 1.48; P = 0.90)., Conclusion: The meta-analysis of the present study showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (three-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth-implant-supported prosthesis and implant-supported prosthesis reconstruction) in terms of the total failure of implants and prostheses and the complication rate of implants and prostheses., Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article., (Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal.)

Background: Treatment of edentulous patients with implant-supported over-dentures improves denture's retention and stability. Published data concerning implant-supported overdenture with cantilever bars that claimed that can affect the survival and bone loss of implants are scarce., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 5-year clinical performance of mandibular implant-supported over-dentures with different attachment systems., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 103 patients who had received mandibular over-dentures supported by two implants were evaluated in a 5-year follow up. Studied groups were patients with Spherblock ball attachment (58 patients), Dolder bar with cantilever (36 patients), and Locator attachment (9 patients). Marginal bone-loss around implants, prosthetic complications, soft tissue status of the implants (gingival index, plaque index, pocket depth, and bleeding on probing) were used to compare studied groups. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) criteria was used to assay patient's satisfaction. One-way ANOVA, Scheffe, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests, were used for the data analysis (α = 0.05)., Results: One hundred and three patients (46 male, 57 female, mean age 64.7 ± 8.6) with 206 implants (Strauman) were studied. The implant survival rate was 100% with mean bone loss of 0.22 mm around implants in 5 years. Prosthetic complications including attachment wear and denture fracture occurred more often with ball attachments. The number of attachment replacement, and post insertion appointments were significantly less in patients with bar attachments (p < 0.05). Pocket depth and gingival index were less in the ball attachment (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Mandibular overdenture supported by two implants can be considered a successful treatment in edentulous patients. The frequency of prosthetic complication is higher in unsplinted than splinted superstructures., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: The implant-supported restorations can be made of all-ceramic materials. The purpose of this study was to compare five year clinical outcomes of zirconia-based and metal ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)., Methods: In this study, 114 posterior implant-supported FDPs including zirconia-based (52) or metal ceramic (62) restorations were made for 114 patients with a mean age of 59 ± 8.4 years and evaluated in a 5 year follow up. The modified California Dental Association (CDA) guidelines were used to assess the quality of the restorations. The soft tissue status was evaluated using gingival and plaque indices, probing depth and bleeding on probing. Additionally, the bone loss around implants was assessed by parallel priapical radiographs. The visual analogue scale was used regarding patients' satisfaction. The data analysis were performed by Kaplan-Meier, log rank test, Cox regression, Mann-Whitney U and Student's t-test. (α = 0.05)., Results: Five year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs were 98.1 % and 100 % respectively with no significant difference (P = 0.12). The success rates were 81.6 % for zirconia-based and 81.0 % for metal ceramic restorations (P = 0.85). The CDA rating of both studied groups was not significantly different except the marginal gap which was better in zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). Fracture of veneering ceramics occurred in 2.7 % of metal ceramic and 6.4 % of zirconia-based FDPs, which were not considered as failure. Soft tissue status was not affected by the type of restorations except for plaque index which was more favorable for zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between marginal bone loss of the two groups (P = 0.30 mesial, P = 0.46 distal)., Conclusions: Zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs showed similar promising clinical performance in the 5-year follow-up., Clinical Significance: Zirconia-based implant-supported FDPs might be a successful restorative method with acceptable survival rate and patient's satisfaction., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Due to the high demand for all-ceramic restorations, monolithic zirconia restorations are nowadays frequently used. With the demand for adult orthodontic treatments, orthodontists need to be mindful of the quality of their brackets bonding to this type of material, as it requires special conditioning. This study aimed to compare different surface treatments of zirconia when bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets. The objectives are to compare the shear bond strength; the amount of adhesive remaining on the surface of the material; the incidence of adhesive, cohesive, and mixed failures; and the occurrence of zirconia fractures., Materials and Methods: Forty monolithic blocks of zirconia of a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 10 mm were prepared and randomly divided into two groups ( n = 20): metallic or ceramic brackets. Each group was subsequently divided into two subgroups ( n = 10) depending on the surface preparation (laser treatment or airborne particle abrasion): SMB (airborne particle abrasion, metal bracket), SCB (airborne particle abrasion, ceramic bracket), LMB (laser; metal bracket), and LCB (laser, ceramic bracket). The samples were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index and the occurrence of zirconia fractures and different types of failures were assessed by optical and electron microscopy., Statistical Analysis: Results were analyzed using analysis of variance., Results: The differences were significant between the metallic (SMB, LMB) and ceramic (SCB, LCB) bracket groups with regard to shear bond strength, with respectively 23.29 ± 5.34 MPa, 21.59 ± 4.03 MPa, 20.06 ± 4.05 MPa, and 17.55 ± 3.88 MPa. In terms of surface treatment, no statistical differences were found between the different groups., Conclusion: Metal brackets have a greater bond strength than ceramic brackets when cemented to zirconia. The surface treatment of zirconia surface has no influence on the shear bond strength., Competing Interests: None declared., (Dental Investigation Society.)

Purpose: Conventional resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) are usually made with a two-retainer design. Unlike conventional RBFPDs, cantilever resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (Cantilever RBFPDs) are, for their part, made with a single-retainer design. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tooth surface preparation on the bond strength of zirconia cantilever single-retainer RBFPDs. The objective is to evaluate the shear bond strength of these single-retainer RBFPDs bonded on 3 different amount of tooth surface preparation., Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted bovine incisors were categorized to 3 groups (n=10), with different amounts of tooth surface preparations. Teeth were restored with single-retainer RBFPDs with different retainer surfaces: large retainer of 32 mm 2 ; medium retainer of 22 mm 2 ; no retainer and only a proximal connecting box of 12 mm 2 . All RBFPDs were made of zirconia and were bonded using an adhesive system without adhesive capacity. Shear forces were applied to these restorations until debonding., Results: Mean shear bond strength values for the groups I, II, and II were 2.39±0.53 MPa, 3.13±0.69 MPa, and 5.40±0.96 MPa, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc test, at a significance level of 0.001. Failure modes were observed and showed a 100% adhesive fracture., Conclusion: It can be concluded that the preparation of large tooth surface preparation might be irrelevant. For zirconia single-retainer RBFPD, only the preparation of a proximal connecting box seems to be a reliable and minimally invasive approach. The differences are statistically significant.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems., Materials and Methods: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 10). Group 1: overlays bonded to tooth structure using Panavia V5 with immediate dentin sealing (IDS); Group 2: overlays bonded using Panavia V5 without IDS; and Group 3: overlays bonded using heated composite combined with a bonding agent with IDS. All the restorations were made of glass-ceramic (Suprinity, Vita). The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and at room temperature. Shear forces were applied using a universal testing machine. Load and displacement were recorded at intervals of 0.1 s. A statistical analysis was used to compare the groups., Results: The mean resistance to fractures ± standard deviation obtained for the Groups 1, 2, and 3 was, respectively, 15.7440 ± 2.13, 12.0750 ± 1.41, and 8.33364 ± 2.85 MPa. The analysis of variance was highly significant ( P < 0.001) allowing us to reject the null hypothesis of equality between the three groups. Comparisons between pairs also provided significant results., Conclusion: Bonding using Panavia V5 with IDS showed a better resistance to shear forces when compared to other bonding techniques. The application of IDS increased the adhesion., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Objectives: The use of zirconia as a framework for prosthetic restorations is increasing due to its favorable mechanical properties. Zirconia also has remarkable aesthetic properties when used as a framework and covered with a layer of cosmetic ceramic. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture toughness of three types of aesthetic ceramics, namely VITA VM®9, ceraMotion® Zr, and IPS e.max® Ceram., Materials and Methods: Three groups of aesthetic ceramics (n=10) were subjected to three-point bending tests. The force leading to fracture was recorded for each sample to measure the impact of the ceramic type on the solidity of the framework. The type of fracture has not been studied in this work. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to statistically analyze the results., Results: The statistical analysis showed significantly different fracture toughness values among the three groups. IPS e.max® showed the lowest fracture toughness (25.42 MPa) compared to VITA VM®9 and ceraMotion® Zr (respectively 40.39 MPa; P<0.001, and 48.78 MPa; P<0.005)., Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that aesthetic ceramics play an important role in the fracture toughness of all-ceramic restorations.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of coloring on the interfacial surface adhesion between a zirconia framework and ceramic veneer using three-point flexural bonding strength., Materials and Methods: A total of 40 zirconia bars (Zirlux ST1; DE Healthcare) were cut and divided into two groups of 20 (Groups 1 and 2). The two groups were then further split and divided into four groups of 10 each (Groups 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b). Groups 1a and 1b tested adhesion of uncolored zirconia and two different shades of ceramic veneer, and Groups 2a and 2b tested adhesion of zirconia colored with two different coloring liquids and one shade of ceramic veneer., Results: Some coloring liquids used to color zirconia can significantly affect the bond strength between zirconia and the veneer, whereas ceramic veneer shades do not influence adhesion., Conclusion: Bonding strength between zirconia framework and ceramic veneer is affected by the coloring of the zirconia.

Purpose: To compare different dental bonding systems that are currently available on the market., Materials and Methods: A total of 100 extracted, intact third molars were coated in resin, cut, and divided into 10 groups of 10 molars each. Molars were bonded to zirconia blocks with a different bonding system per group. Resistance to shear forces was tested using a universal traction machine. Samples were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine the type of fracture., Results: Statistical analyses showed a significant influence of adhesive on the zirconia-dentin assembly's resistance to shear forces. SEM analysis showed mainly adhesive and mixed fractures., Conclusion: Dentin bonding systems without adhesive capability showed better results than self-etch systems.

Purpose: The micropercolation testing of dental materials is currently used to evaluate the sealing ability. The aim of the present study is to compare the sealing ability of distinct assembling materials for zirconium oxide peripheric crowns., Materials and Methods: One hundred teeth were prepared to be thermocycled after being distributed at random in 10 groups each containing 10 specimens (group 1: Fuji One; group 2: Fuji Plus; group 3: Variolink II; group 4: RelyX Ultimate; group 5: Multilink; group 6: Panavia F2.0; group 7: Bifix QM; group 8: RelyX Unicem 2; group 9: Maxcem Elite; group 10: Bifix SE)., Results: RelyX Unicem 2 and RelyX Ultimate yielded high imperviousness percentages. The sealing ability in the vestibular area and lingual area is indeed best in the presence of these two materials. Our results show no difference whether the chamfer is situated in the enamel or in the dentin., Conclusion: A zirconium crown should be preferably cemented with a glass-ionomer cement modified by addition of resin material., (© 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists.)

Introduction: Our study's objective was to compare resistance to fracture between endocrown and conventional post and core restorations when subjected to shear force., Materials and Methods: Thirty human mandibular premolars were extracted for orthodontic reasons, endodontically treated, and restored using three different methods: endocrown, glass fiber post and composite resin core, and metal post. All the crowns were made from IPS e.max ceramic. Shear forces were applied to these restorations using a test machine until breakage. Load and displacement were recorded every 0.1 s., Results: No significant difference was observed in resistance to fracture between glass fiber post and metal post. No relationship between the displacement of prosthetic dental system and type of material used was uncovered and by comparing the type of fracture with the restoration material used. However, a greater number of favorable fractures were observed in the glass fiber group whereas most of the fractures in the endocrown and metal post groups were unfavorable., Conclusion: Endocrown displays better resistance to fracture compared to conventional post and core restorations. In addition, endocrown did not show more displacement or cause more unfavorable fractures than the conventional restorations. This restoration may represent a reliable alternative for restoring a damaged, endodontically treated tooth., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the precision of optical impression (Trios, 3Shape) versus that of conventional impression (Imprint IV, 3M-ESPE) with three different margins (shoulder, chamfer, and knife-edge) on Frasaco teeth., Materials and Methods: The sample comprised of 60 zirconia half-crowns, divided into six groups according to the type of impression and margin. Scanning electron microscopy enabled us to analyze the gap between the zirconia crowns and the Frasaco teeth, using ImageJ software, based on eight reproducible and standardized measuring points., Results: No statistically significant difference was found between conventional impressions and optical impressions, except for two of the eight points. A statistically significant difference was observed between the three margin types; the chamfer and knife-edge finishing lines appeared to offer better adaptation results than the shoulder margin., Conclusion: Zirconia crowns created from optical impression and those created from conventional impression present similar adaptation. While offering identical results, the former have many advantages. In view of our findings, we believe the chamfer margin should be favored.

Objective: Adhesives systems have a drawback when utilized for bonding orthodontic brackets: they shrink during photopolymerization creating microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of different orthodontic adhesives around brackets and enamel., Materials and Methods: Sixty noncarious mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into six groups of adhesives used for bonding brackets to dental enamel: NeoBond ® Light Cure Adhesive Kit, Transbond™ Plus Self-Etching, Victory V-Slot APC PLUS ® + Transbond™ MIP, Rely-A-Bond ® Kit, Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesive Kit (OptiBond ® ), and Transbond™ MIP. Following bonding, all teeth underwent 2500 cycles of thermal cycling in baths ranging from 5°C to 55°C before being immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 h. All samples were examined under a binocular microscope to assess the degree of microleakage at the "bracket-adhesive" and "adhesive-enamel" interfaces in the gingival and occlusal regions of the bracket., Results: A significant difference was found at the "occlusal bracket-adhesive" interface. The highest microleakage values were found in the occlusal region, although no significant. Microleakage was observed in all groups., Conclusion: Group 2 had the highest microleakage values whereas Group 6 had the lowest values., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: The aim of this work is to evaluate different types of materials used for making implant abutments, by means of an in vitro study and a review of the literature, in order to identify the indications for a better choice of an implant-supported restoration in the anterior section., Materials and Methods: 5 implant abutments were tested in a random order in the superior anterior maxilla of pig gingiva (n = 8): titanium dioxide (Nobel Biocare); zirconium dioxide, Standard BO shade (Nobel Biocare, Kloten, Switzerland); zirconium dioxide, Light BI shade (Nobel Biocare); zirconium dioxide, Intense A 3.5 shade (Nobel Biocare); and aluminium oxide. Each abutment was tested for 2 mm and 3 mm thickness. To determine color variation, VITA Easyshade Advance spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) was used., Results: Results showed that the color variation induced by the abutment would be affected by the abutment material and gingival thickness, when the gingival thickness is 2 mm. All materials except zirconium dioxide (Standard shade) caused a visible change of color. Then, as the thickness of the gingiva increased to 3 mm, the color variation was attenuated in a significant manner and became invisible for all types of abutments, except those made of aluminium oxide., Conclusion: Zirconium dioxide is the material causing the lowest color variation at 2 mm and at 3 mm, whereas aluminium oxide causes the highest color variation no matter the thickness.

Aim. This study sought to compare the microleakage of three adhesive systems in the context of Erbium-YAG laser and diamond bur cavity procedures. Cavities were restored with composite resin. Materials and Methods. Standardized Class V cavities were performed in 72 extracted human teeth by means of diamond burs or Er-YAG laser. The samples were randomly divided into six groups of 12, testing three adhesive systems (Clearfil s(3) Bond Plus, Xeno® Select, and Futurabond U) for each method used. Cavities were restored with composite resin before thermocycling (methylene blue 2%, 24 h). The slices were prepared using a microtome. Optical microscope photography was employed to measure the penetration. Results. No statistically significant differences in microleakage were found in the use of bur or laser, nor between adhesive systems. Only statistically significant values were observed comparing enamel with cervical walls (p < 0.001). Conclusion. It can be concluded that the Er:YAG laser is as efficient as diamond bur concerning microleakage values in adhesive restoration procedures, thus constituting an alternative tool for tooth preparation.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare, in primary pig teeth, the pulp response after a pulpotomy using either Biodentine (a new tricalcium-silicate cement), white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA), or formocresol (FC) and repeat the same after direct pulp capping using either Biodentine, WMTA, or calcium hydroxide., Methods: A total of 180 primary teeth from 9 healthy 4-month-old female pigs were divided into 3 experimental periods (7, 28, and 90 days) for each material used for the pulpotomy and direct pulp capping treatments. Seven, 28, and 90 days later, the animals were euthanized and the specimens were prepared for histological examination and evaluation. The data collected from the histological examinations were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple comparison tests., Results: In pulpotomy groups, there was a significant difference between Biodentine and WMTA vs FC in terms of inflammatory cell response and hard tissue formation. In direct pulp capping groups, there was only a significant difference between Biodentine and calcium hydroxide in terms of hard tissue formation in a 7-day period., Conclusions: Biodentine and white mineral trioxide aggregate are both suitable, biocompatible materials for pulp capping in primary teeth of pigs.

Purpose: Recently, a fully Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatie (NHA) paste has been introduced for augmentation procedures in osseous defects and is attracting increasing interest in medicine and dentistry. The purpose of the present study was to assess and compare the pulp response of pig primary teeth after capping with NHA and formocresol in pulpotomy and NHA and calcium hydroxide in direct pulp capping., Methods: Forty teeth of two 4-month old pigs were pulpotomized and capped with these materials. Four weeks later, the animals were euthanized and the specimens were prepared for histological examination., Results: In the pulpotomy groups, there was a significant difference between NHA and FC in terms of pulp response, hard tissue formation and normal pulp tissue preservation. In the direct pulp capping groups, there was no significant difference between NHA and Ca(OH)2 in terms of criteria mentioned above., Conclusions: The results of the present histological study show that, in the short term and in non-carious pig teeth, NHA appears to be biocompatible and provokes no moderate or severe inflammatory reaction in pulp tissue in both pulpotomy and direct pulp capping treatments.

The management of paediatric dentistry treatment is essentially based on behaviour management but some behaviour troubles or mental retardation may hinder this kind of treatment at the dental office without any premedication. This often leads the dentist to change his treatment planning even if this may compromise the quality of treatment . Conscious sedation techniques enable stress and pain control during the active treatment phase and represent a useful alternative to general anaesthesia which cannot be used on a routine based level. Conscious sedation by the inhalation of nitrous oxide and oxygen (MEOPA) represents a good choice, as well as by its harmlessness as by its fast reversibility. MEOPA is a precious help in our practice, provided that its administration is totally under central and all contra-indication are respected. However sedation by inhalation should in no case be systematized and its goal must remain the progressive rehabilitation of the patient in a circuit of traditional ambulatory care.

Aim: To compare the shear bond strength and microleakage of four adhesive systems to the enamel and dentine of primary bovine teeth., Methods: 120 bovine primary mandibular incisors were collected and stored in an aqueous 1% chloramine solution at room temperature for no longer than 3 months after extraction (80 for shear bond testing and 40 for microleakage evaluation). The adhesives tested were Clearfil SE bond (SE), Adper Prompt L Pop (LP), Xeno III (XE), and Prime and Bond NT (PB). For shear bond strength testing the specimens were wet ground to 600 grit SiC paper to expose a flat enamel or dentine surface. After bonding and restoration with Dyract AP (DAP), the teeth were subjected to shear stress using a universal testing machine. For microleakage evaluation, facial class V cavities were prepared half in enamel and half in cementum. All cavities were restored with DAP. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% methylene blue, the dye penetration was evaluated under a stereomicroscope., Statistics: All data were analysed by Chi-square tests or Fisher's tests when adapted in order to determine the significant differences between groups. Results were considered as significant for p < 0.05. Results were analysed with an ANOVA test and a Bonferroni's multiple comparison. The level of significance was p < 0.05., Results: Shear bond strength values (MPa,) ranged from: on enamel 11.06 to 5.34, in decreasing order SE, LP, XE and PB and on dentine 10.47 to 4.74, in decreasing order SE, XE, LP and PB. Differences in bond strengths between the four systems on enamel and dentine were all statistically significant, excepted for XE vs LP (shear bond at dentine). No significant differences were recorded in the microleakage degree between the four adhesive systems on enamel and on dentine (p > 0.0.5)., Conclusions: The highest shear bond strength was achieved by Clearfil SE bond and the lowest by Prime and Bond NT. There was no significant difference concerning the sealing ability of the four adhesive systems.

Purpose: This study evaluated the sealing ability of different types of restorative-adhesive combinations on deciduous molars in vitro., Methods: Facial and lingual Class V cavities were prepared in 120 primary teeth. They were randomly divided into 8 groups of N= 15, in which different adhesives were used (XE=Xeno III; LP=Adper Prompt L Pop; IB=I Bond; SB=Scotch Bond 1; EP=Etch & Prime 3.0; AS=AdheSE; OB=Optibond Solo plus self-etch primer; CS=Clearfil SE Bond). All cavities were restored with composite Z 250. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% methylene blue, the dye penetration was evaluated under a microscope., Results: In enamel and in cementum: the best seals were obtained with XE and LP, followed by CS, AS, IB, OB, SB, and EP (P=.001). No significant differences were recorded in the microleakage degree between the cementum and the enamel margins (P=.40)., Conclusions: In this in vitro model, Xeno III and Adper Prompt L Pop provided the best seals both at the enamel and the cementum margins of Class V cavities in primary molars.

The aim of this study was to compare the marginal microleakage of Fuji II LC (A), composite resin Z250 (B), Fuji IX GP (C), and Dyract AP (F) in class V cavities and at the Fuji II LC/Z250 (D) and Fuji IX GP/composite resin Z250 (E) interfaces of an open sandwich technique on deciduous teeth. After thermocycling the mean marginal dye penetration at the enamel junction was 21.6 microns +/- 14.2 for group A; 83.6 microns +/- 32.3 for group B; 7.5 microns +/- 7.5 for group C; 38.7 microns +/- 27.5 for group D, and 0 micron for groups E and F. Mean dye penetration at the cementum junction was 37.1 +/- 20.2 (A); 123 +/- 42.1 (B); 28.7 +/- 17.1 (C); 0 (D); 14.4 +/- 14.4 (E); and 0 (F) microns. No leakage was seen at the junction between Fuji II LC and Z250 (0 micron), whereas a mean leakage of 184 microns between Fuji IX and Z250 was measured. In enamel the best seal was obtained with Dyract AP, but with differences at the limit of significance (P = 0.07). Sealing was significantly worse with Z250 (p = 0.03 versus Fuji II LC; p = 0.006 versus Fuji IX GP; and p = 0.003 versus Dyract AP). In cementum, the comparison between the grouped data Z250-Fuji II LC versus Fuji IX GP-Dyract AP was highly significant (p < 0.001), while there was no detectable difference between Z250 and Fuji II LC.