1. Suboptimal visual outcome after femto-LASIK ablation in a high myopic patient.
- Author
-
Nuijts RMMA, Ollivier R, Allan BD, Lawless MA, Carones F, Güell JL, Vinciguerra P, and Kohnen T
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Adult, Treatment Outcome, Visual Acuity, Refraction, Ocular, Lasers, Excimer therapeutic use, Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ methods, Corneal Wavefront Aberration surgery, Myopia surgery, Myopia complications, Astigmatism surgery, Astigmatism complications
- Abstract
A 28-year-old nurse had an aberration-free femto-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed for her myopia of -6.25 -0.50 × 096 and -6.75 -0.50 × 175 in the right and left eye, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) preoperatively was 20/16. Preoperatively, there were no abnormalities on Scheimpflug imaging, and a pachymetry of 585 μm was measured in both eyes. Flap thickness was 115 μm. The patient was quite nervous during the surgery. Since the surgery, her uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA are suboptimal at 20/30 and 20/20 in the right eye, and 20/20 and 20/16 in the left eye. 3 months postoperatively, there is a stable manifest refraction of +0.25 -1.25 × 030 and +0.25 -0.00 × 0. The keratometric astigmatism in the Scheimpflug imaging is 1.2 diopter (D) × 114 and 0.4 D × 78 in the right and left eyes, respectively (FIgures 1 and 2). Thinnest pachymetry is 505 μm and 464 μm in the right and left eye, respectively. Her wavefront analysis shows refraction in a 6 mm zone of -0.99 -1.22 × 32 and -0.91 -0.36 × 136. The cycloplegic refraction is 1.25 -1.00 × 023 and +1.00 -0.25 × 006 (Figures 3 and 4). What is the cause of the suboptimal visual outcome in this case? What would be your treatment strategy to improve visual outcome?, (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF