Search

What are the experience, and gynaecological and reproductive health outcomes in young adult women who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)?A retrospective observational study was conducted at a single institution between May 2019 and February 2021 including 87 women aged over 18 years undergoing OTC. Medical characteristics and questionnaire data collected more than 18 months after OTC were analysed.Close to 74% (n = 64/87) of women had a follow-up consultation and completed the questionnaire. Most women found the information provided on the OTC technique and the strategies proposed to restore fertility with ovarian tissue understandable and useful. The majority of patients thought that OTC had a positive impact on their well-being during disease treatment. Anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentration decreased significantly after treatment (P0.0001) and was significantly lower when patients received chemotherapy before OTC (P = 0.0039). The total cyclophosphamide equivalent dose was significantly higher in women with FSH concentrations above 25 IU/l after treatment (P = 0.0004). More than 70% of women who planned a pregnancy after the end of treatment succeeded, with a natural pregnancy rate close to 53%. Only nine patients (8.0%) underwent ovarian tissue transplantation for fertility restoration and six of them became pregnant and delivered at least once.Young adult women expressed a good satisfaction rate with OTC and that their experience had been beneficial. The usage rate of cryopreserved ovarian tissue remains low. The gynaecological and reproductive health follow-up consultation should be included in the supportive care provided following OTC.

Background : ENA is a selective inhibitor of IDH2 approved in the US for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory IDH2 mutated AML. Little is known on its efficacy in patients with IDH2m myelodysplastic syndromes. Here we report the preliminary results of a Phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ENA in three different cohorts of MDS : Higher risk MDS having failed HMA (cohort A, n=29), untreated higher risk MDS without life threatening cytopenias (ie ANC < 500/mm3 or any recent severe infections and/or platelets below 30,000/mm3 and any bleeding symptom, cohort B, with the addition of AZA in non-Responders after 3 cycles, n=29) and lower risk MDS having failed ESA (cohort C, n=10). (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03744390). Methods : Subjects enrolled in cohort A, B or C received continuous 28-day cycles of ENA - 100 mg PO QD. In cohort B, Azacitidine (75 mg/m2/d x 7 days, SC) was added to Enasidenib after 3 cycles, only in the absence of IWG 2006 response (absence of CR, PR or HI). The primary endpoint was Overall hematological response (including CR, PR,stable disease with HI according to IWG 2006). All patients who achieved CR, PR or HI were considered as responders and could continue treatment until loss of response. Secondary endpoints of the trial included safety,duration of response, EFS, Overall survival and translational project evaluating the role of biomarkers on response.We report interim results in the first 26 pts enrolled. Resul t s : At data cut off (6/15/2021), 45 pts were enrolled, including 26 who were evaluable for the primary endpoint. 11, 9 and 6 were enrolled in cohort A, B and C respectively. Median age was 75.5 years and 34.6% were female. WHO was MDS-MLD, MDS-RS-SLD, MDS-RS-MLD, MDS-EB1, MDS-EB2, CMML and AML (with 20-30% blast) in 1, 2, 3,4, 10, 2 and 4 pts, respectively. IPSS was low, intermediate 1, int 2 and high in 1, 7, 13, 5 resp. IPSS-R was low,intermediate, high and very high in 4, 8, 11, 3 resp. At data cut off, 10 pts were still on treatment. Most common reasons for discontinuing ENA were Treatment failure (7.7%), disease progression (23.1%), adverse events (7.7%) and death (3.8%). Three patients experienced a differentiation syndrome (1 in cohort A and 2 in cohort B) that resolved without sequelae. Other most common grade 3-4 AEs were nausea/diarrhea (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=5). Overall best response rate (ORR including CR, PR, and HI) was achieved in 11 pts (42 %), including 6 CR (55%), 2 PR (18%), 2 mCR with HI (18%), 1 Stable disease with HI (9%). ORR was achieved in 3 (27 %), 5 (56 %) and 3 (50%)in cohort A, B and C respectively. In cohort B, AZA wad added to ENA in 3 patients who were primarily resistant to ENA. Among them, 2/3 patients subsequently achieved a response. Moreover, CR was seen in 2, 1 and 3 in cohort A, B and C respectively. The 6 months response rate was 29.5 % [6 ;59], 53.1 % [11.7 ;83] and 50 % [7.7 ;82.9] in cohort A, B and C respectively. At the time of analysis, all responses but 2 were sustained. Responses were lower (p=0.27) among the 23 pts with IDH2 R140 (30.4%) as compared to the 3 with IDH2 R172 mutation (66.7%). With a median follow up of 8.6 months, the median OS was 17.3 months (figure 1). Six patients died during follow-up, including 4/11 in cohort A, 1/9 in cohort B and 1/6 in cohort C. The 6 months death rate observed was 8.2 % [0 ;18.4] and the 1-year OS was 55.4%, 100% and 80% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Four patients evolved to AML (2 and 2 in cohort A and B) with a 1y risk of AML of 19.3%. Conclusion : Results from the first 26 patients included in this study show that ENA has no limiting toxicity in patients with MDS and that it can provide responses in 42% of patients. These responses appear to be encouraging, especially in first-line (low and high risk) patients. An update of this study will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ades: JAZZ: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sebert: BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Stamatoulas Bastard: Pfizer: Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi: Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Platzbecker: AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Fenaux: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: enasidenib is not approved for MDS

Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is an oral, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 approved in the US for adult patients with unfit or relapse/refractory AML with IDH1 mutation. Little is known on its efficacy in patients with IDH1 mutated MDS. Here we report interim results of a Phase 2 study evaluating safety and efficacy of IVO in three different cohorts of MDS patients: Higher risk MDS having failed azacytidine (AZA) (cohort A, n=29), untreated higher risk MDS without life threatening cytopenias (ie ANC < 500/mm3 or any recent severe infections and/or platelets below 30,000/mm3 and any bleeding symptom,) as a first line treatment (cohort B, with the addition of AZA in non-Responders after 3 cycles, n=29) and lower risk MDS having failed EPO (cohort C, n=10). (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03503409). Methods: Subjects enrolled in cohort A, B or C received continuous 28-day cycles of IVO - 500 mg orally QD. In cohort B, AZA (75 mg/m2/d x 7 days, SC) was added to IVO after 3 cycles, only in the absence of IWG 2006 response (absence of CR, PR or HI). The primary endpoint was overall hematological response rate (ORR) at 3 and 6 months (including CR, PR, stable disease with HI according to IWG 2006). All responders allowed to continue treatment until loss of response. Secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response, EFS, overall survival and translational project evaluating the role of biomarkers on response. We report the preliminary results on the first 26 pts enrolled. Results: At data cut off (6/15/2021), 32 patients had been enrolled, including 26 who were evaluable for the primary endpoint. 13, 11 and 2 were enrolled in cohort A, B and C respectively. Median age was 76 years and 50% were female. WHO was MDS-MLD, MDS-EB1, MDS-EB2, CMML and low blast count AML in 2, 2, 12, 1 and 9 patients respectively. IPSS-R was low, intermediate, high and very high in 2, 6, 5 and 13 resp. IDH1 mutation was p.R132C in 15 patients, p.R132H in 7, p.R132G/S in 3 and not specified in 1. The ORR was 69% (18 patients) including 12 CR (46%), 1 PR and 5 HI. Most patients achieved response after 3 cycles (17/18). Response was achieved in 7 (54%), 10 (91%) and 1 (50%) in cohort A, B and C respectively. Moreover, CR was achieved in 3, 8 and 1 in cohort A, B and C respectively. In cohort B, AZA was added to IVO in one patient after 3 cycles, without additional response. With a median follow up of 9.1 months, the median duration of response of the 18 responders was 7.4 months, 9 of them lost their response, and two had died without loss of response (from bleeding and after HSCT, respectively). IPSS-R was the only prognostic factor of response after 6 cycles. At data cut off, 12 patients had progressed (9 in cohort A, 2 in cohort B and 1 in cohort C) and 11 (42%, 10 in cohort A and 1 in cohort C) patients had died, mostly of relapse/progression (n=5/11), infection in 1, suicide in 1, hemorrhage in 1 and other unrelated causes in 3. Median overall survival was 14 months in the whole cohort, 7.7 and not reached in cohort A and B resp. The most common treatment-related serious adverse event (SAE) was differentiation syndrome (4/5), one died and three resolved without sequelae. One patient had febrile neutropenia related to IVO, resolved without sequelae. Conclusion: IVO was well tolerated in MDS patients with significant responses in all the cohorts. With a response rate of 91%, IVO was particularly effective in treatment naïve higher risk MDS patients with IDH1 mutations (cohort B). These encouraging preliminary results have to be confirm in more patients. The IDIOME study is still ongoing, and molecular monitoring results of IDH1 mutations will be presented. Disclosures Sebert: BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Cluzeau: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Honoraria; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Stamatoulas Bastard: Pfizer: Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenaux: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Ades: Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Context. The perhaps only CMML-specific Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) established hydroxyurea (HY) as the main treatment (Tx) for advanced proliferative CMML (Wattel Blood 1996). In Europe, the only hypomethylating agent (HMA) approved in CMML is AZA in non proliferative CMML-2. Phase 2 trials reported the activity of decitabine (DAC) in advanced proliferative CMML (Braun Blood 2011, Santini Leukemia 2018). We performed a RCT of DAC (±HY during the first 3 cycles) vs HY alone in those pts. Methods. The DACOTA trial (EudraCT 2014-000200-10) accrued pts with previously untreated (or < 6 weeks of HY), proliferative (WBC ≥ 13x109/L) CMML with advanced disease defined per Wattel et al as presence of extramedullary disease or ≥2 criteria among: BM blasts ≥5%, abnormal karyotype (except -Y), ANC ≥ 16x109/L, Hb < 10 g/dL, platelets < 100 x109/L or splenomegaly > 5 cm below costal margin. Pts were randomized 1:1 to DAC (20 mg/m2/d IV 5d/28d) or HY (1g/d, adjusted on WBC, 28d cycles) and treated until death, AML transformation or progression. The primary endpoint was EFS, events being death, transformation to AML, progression of myeloproliferation after 3+ cycles or progression of blasts and cytopenias after 6+ cycles. Response was assessed with IWG 2006 criteria modified to account for improvement of myeloproliferation, after central morphology review. Intent-to-treat analyses were done considering missing responses as failures. Results. From Oct 2014 to Sep 2019, 217 pts from 47 centers were screened and 170 randomized (84 DAC and 86 HY), including 12 pts (6 DAC and 6 HY) who never started Tx. Median age was 73 years (IQR 68-78). WHO was CMML-NA/1/2 in 2, 114 and 54 pts, respectively (resp). Median WBC 34.9 x109/L (IQR 22.9-55.7). Cytogenetic risk (Such Haematologica 2011) was fav 69%, int 12%, adv 18% NA 1%. Mutations in TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1 and signaling genes (CBL, JAK2, FLT3, KIT, NRAS, KRAS and CSF3R) were present in 64%, 51%, 62% and 57% resp. 72 pts had received HY for a median 27 days prior to randomization. Aside from older age in the HY arm (median 74 vs 71.5y in the DAC arm), there was no imbalance between Tx arms. DAC and HY pts received a median of 5 (IQR 3-12) and 6 (IQR 3-14) cycles, resp. As of 15th June 2020, 5 and 10 DAC and HY pts were still on Tx. Reasons for Tx cessation in the DAC arm were death (n=19), AML transformation (n=16), progression (n=9) , hematological toxicity (n=13) or other (n=21). Reasons for Tx cessation in the HY arm were death (n=14), AML transformation (n=13), progression (n=18), hematological toxicity (n=6) or other (n=20). 126 and 85 pts received 3 and 6 cycles, resp. In the ITT population, ORR at 3 cycles was 56% (7CR, 25 mCR±HI, 15 SD+HI) and 30% (0 CR, 8 mCR±HI, 18 SD+HI) in the DAC and HY arms, resp (p=0.0011) and ORR at 6 cycles was 32% (6 CR, 9 mCR±HI, 12 SD+HI) and 17% (2 CR, 4 mCR±HI, 9 SD+HI) in the DAC and HY arms, resp (p=0.033). Median response duration was 15.9 vs 18.2 months (mos) in the DAC and HY arm, resp (p=0.81). Infection and hemorrhage occurred at least once in 49% and 31% of pts, resp. 55% of DAC pts and 38% of HY pts required hospitalization at least once (p=0.05). Non-heme ≥ grade 2 AEs occurred in 79% and 63% of DAC and HY arms, resp (p=0.03). Grade ≥3 cardiac AEs occurred in 13 DAC and 4 HY pts, resp. With a median follow-up of 13.9 mos, median EFS was 12.6 vs 10.3 mos in the DAC and HY arms, resp (reference DAC arm, HR= 1.14 CI95 0.8-1.64, p= 0.46). Median AML-free survival (AMLFS) was 13.6 and 15.8 mos in the DAC and HY arms resp (p=0.86). Median OS was 18.4 and 23.1 mos in the DAC and HY arms, resp (p=0.72). Considering death and AML transformation as competing risks there was no significant difference in cumulative incidence of AML (p=0.1) or death without transformation (p=0.06) between arms. 30 pts from the HY arm received an HMA (DAC n= 13, AZA n= 16, both=1) after study exit. Censoring at HMA onset in the HY arm, median OS was 18.4 vs 30.4 in the DAC and HY arm, resp (p=0.15). 13 pts were transplanted (DAC n= 10, HY n= 3). There was no interaction between Tx arm and CMML-0/1 vs -2, platelets ≥ vs 0.05). Conclusion. RCTs are feasible in advanced proliferative CMML, which remains an unmet medical need. In these pts, DAC did not provide an overall or event-free survival advantage over HY. HY remains a valid option in advanced proliferative CMML. However, one third of HY pts subsequently received an HMA and more DAC pts achieved a response and were bridged to HSCT. Figure Disclosures Itzykson: Abbvie: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS (Celgene): Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Stemline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoethix (now Merck): Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Santini:BMS, J&J, Novartis: Honoraria; Acceleron, BMS, Menarini, Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda, Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding. Lionel:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luebbert:Janssen: Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Travel expenses. Stamatoulas Bastard:Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Solary:Janssen: Research Funding. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fenaux:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Decitabine for CMML with WBC > 13 x109/L.

Background : AETHERA randomized controlled study (Moskowitz, Lancet 2015) showed that the administration of Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improved progression free survival (PFS) in BV-naive refractory/relapsed (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. However, since BV approval for R/R HL in 2012, many patients are receiving salvage BV before ASCT, alone or combined with chemotherapy. In the AMAHRELIS retrospective nationwide French study, we investigated the real-life outcome of patients with R/R HL mostly treated with BV-based salvage therapies and who received post-ASCT BV maintenance. Objectives : As primary 0objective, we assessed 2 years-PFS of patients treated with post-ASCT BV maintenance from 2012 to 2017 in France. As secondary objectives, we correlated variables (such as use of salvage BV before ASCT, centrally reviewed TEP-assessed response) with survival, and evaluated reported tolerance of BV using the CTCAE v4.0 criteria. Methods : We conducted this observational retrospective study in 58 national centers. Inclusion criteria were R/R HL patients who received at least two infusions of BV after ASCT, at the exclusion of patients in progression after transplant. Among 1134 patients who underwent ASCT for R/R HL between 2012 and 2017 in France based on the French society of bone marrow transplantation database, 835 (74%) patients were screened and data were available for 794 (70%) patients. FDG-PET scan at relapse and before transplantation were recorded and centrally reviewed (still ongoing). FDG-PET scan were reported using the Deauville score (DS), and complete remission was defined by a DS < 4. Post-transplant status was evaluated based on CT-scan or on FDG-PET scan results. This study was approved by the SFGMTC and the LYSA. Results : Fifteen percent (115/794) of patients met eligibility criteria, and were enrolled in this study. Among them, 95% met inclusion criteria for BV maintenance according to the AETHERA study as primary refractory disease (43%), early relapse (27%) or extranodal disease (49%). The mean number of BV injections after ASCT was 11 (3-18). Patients characteristics were : mean age was 34 y (range between 16-70y), 54% were male, and 57% of patients were stage III or IV at relapse. Notably, 70% of patients received BV as salvage therapy and 81% achieved a complete remission before ASCT. The median follow-up period was 35 months. The 2 years survival for the whole cohort was 75,3% for PFS (95% CI : 68,4-84,3) and 96,4% for overall survival (95% CI : 94,2-100) (Figure 1). The use of BV as part of salvage therapy before transplant had no impact on PFS. We observed a trend to an increased occurrence of neuropathy in patients receiving BV before transplant without impact on early treatment discontinuation. We tested several variables for correlation with survival using a univariate Cox model including high risk patients defined as primary refractory disease or early relapse and disseminated disease, extranodal relapse, use of BV before transplant, number of salvage lines, remission status before and after transplant (complete response versus partial response or stable disease), time between ASCT and BV onset and number of BV cycles after transplant. Among these variables, high risk status, less than 10 post transplant BV cycles and absence of post transplant complete remission significantly correlated with a reduced survival probability, and remained significant after analysis using a multivariate Cox model (Table 1). Conclusion : From the real-life AMAHRELIS study, we confirmed the very good outcome of R/R HL patients in the era of post-transplant BV maintenance, with a 2y-PFS of 75% similar to the results of the AETHERA landmark study (2y-PFS of 63%). The results of current strategies with pre- and post-transplant BV outperformed historical series based on high dose therapies, including those of tandem transplant for high risk patients. Future studies incorporating BV strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors might improve outcome in R/R HL patients. Disclosures Meignan: ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Sibon:takeda france: Consultancy. Stamatoulas Bastard:Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Fornecker:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Casasnovas:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cartron:Gilead: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ghesquieres:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; CELGENE: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria. Brice:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Hermine:AB Science: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding. Rubio:Medac: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovii: Research Funding. Deau Fischer:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Background: MDS-RS are associated with a low risk of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) progression and prolonged survival in most cases, but recurring anemia whose treatments, including Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA), Lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), Luspatercept, and experimental drugs generally have transient effect and/or are not widely available. MDS-RS patients thus eventually have regular Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion dependency (TD) associated with mean low hemoglobin levels, and chronic anemia responsible for reduced quality of life, cardiovascular complications, and iron overload with organ dysfunction. We performed a retrospective observational study to describe transfusion characteristics and costs, along with clinical events, in a French population of RBC TD MDS-RS patients. Methods: Adult RBC-TD patients with MDS-RS from 12 hematology departments of the GFM were included. The number of RBC concentrates transfused was assessed over the last 6 months (during which no other treatment than transfusions was received), and patients categorized in low transfusion burden (LTB: 3 to 7 RBC/16 weeks) and high transfusion burden (HTB: ≥8 RBC concentrates /16 weeks). Data about iron chelation, full time hospitalization (differing from day care facility stays for programmed transfusions), causes of hospitalization, treatment of anemia before inclusion and transfusion costs was collected. Results: 100 patients MDS-RS were included, with a median time from diagnosis of 5 years (1 to 21 years). Median age was 78 years (57 to 99). Patients had received a median of 2 lines of treatment (including an ESA in 97% of them). 21% had LTB and 79% HTB. HTB patients had a longer disease duration, more frequent iron chelation (82% versus 50% in LTB patients, p=0.0052) and higher serum ferritin at inclusion (median 1958 µg/l versus 1176 µg/l, p=0.03). During the 6-month study period, 22% of the patients required full time hospitalization (in addition to day care facility for transfusions), including 25% of patients with HTB and 15% with LTB, and 43% during overall disease follow-up. Causes of full time hospitalization (figure) were symptomatic anemia (41%), general condition degradation (5%) or cardiac disease (8%), to both of which anemia potentially contributed, infection (23%), bleeding (8%), pulmonary (2%), 13% for other reasons. 15 HTB patients versus 1 LTB patient were hospitalized for symptomatic anemia. The 6-months average transfusion costs, including cost of the day care facility for RBC transfusion, transportation to and from the hospital, lab tests and iron chelation were $21459/patient, excluding costs of full-time hospitalization for complications. The average cost in HTB and LTB patients was $22829 and $7586/patient, respectively. Conclusion: Most MDS-RS patients currently become RBC-TD, often during several years, and most have high transfusion burden. The average cost of RBC transfusions and iron chelation was $21459/ 6 months. During this short observation time, 22% of the patients required full time hospitalization, due to complications of anemia in at least 50% of the cases, which also increased costs (comparison with rates of hospitalization in an age and sex matched general population will be presented). Poor quality of life associated with chronic anemia should also be taken into account in those RBC-TD patients. Widely available treatments, capable of avoiding RBC transfusion dependence and improving mean hemoglobin levels, are required in those MDS-RS patients. Disclosures Cony-Makhoul: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Cluzeau:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stamatoulas Bastard:Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Park:Pfizer: Other: Travel expenses; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background AHL2011 study (NCT01358747) demonstrated that PET negativity after 2 cycles of upfront BEACOPPescalated (BEA) allows to switch to 4 cycles of ABVD 84% of patients (pts) with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) leading to reduce immediate treatment toxicity without loss of tumor control (Casasnovas RO, Lancet Oncol 2019). We report an updated follow-up of the study with a focus on the late treatment-related adverse events including secondary primary malignancies (SPM) and unfertility. Methods In AHL2011 823 patients aged 18-60 with a newly diagnosed advanced HL defined by an Ann Arbor stage III, IV or IIB with M/T>0.33 or extranodal involvement were prospectively randomized between a standard arm (n=413) delivering 6 x BEA and a PET-driven arm (n=410) after 2 x BEA delivering 4 x ABVD in PET2- pts and 4 x BEA in PET2+ pts. In both arms PET performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. We aimed at excluding inferiority of the PET-driven arm of at least 10% compared to the standard arm which was achieved with the analysis on 10/2017. The data cutoff for the present analysis was 29 April 2019. A prospective fertility substudy for patients 24 IU/L twice during 5y follow-up when available, with estradiol < 50pg/ml, and low ovarian reserve (OR) by AMH < 0.16ng/ml. - In males, FSH serum levels and sperm analysis. Results With a 5.6 year median follow-up, 5y PFS and OS were similar in both randomization arms (PFS: 87.5% vs 86.7% ;HR 1.07, 95%CI 0.74-1.57; p=0.67; OS: 97.7% in both arms; HR=1.012, 95%CI 0.50-2.10; p=0.53). In the whole cohort full interim PET assessment predicted patients PFS (5y PFS = 92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR= 3.26 ;95%CI 18.3-5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR= 12.4 ;95%CI :7.31-19.51] in PET4+ pts respectively; p 5g (HR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14-0.96; p=0.04) but not to arms. In males, median baseline FSH levels were similar in both arms but 19 and 23% experienced severe oligospermia at baseline in standard (n=214) and PET-driven arms (n=210), respectively. Chemotherapy dramatically reduced sperm numeration in both arms but recovery occured more frequently in the PET-driven arm (severe oligospermia at 4-5 year: 50% vs 93%). A total of 84 patients (14.7%) reported pregnancies including 49 (17.2%) in the PET driven arm vs 35 (12.3%) in the standard arm (p=0.12) and required assisted reproductive technology treatment more frequently in the standard arm (23% vs 14%). Conclusions The prolonged follow-up confirms that the PET-driven strategy delivering 4 cycles of ABVD in PET negative patients after 2 cycles of BEA is non inferior compared to standard 6 cycles of BEA. PET4 provides additionnal prognostic information to PET2 and identifies patients with particularly poor prognosis. The PET-driven treatment allows to reduce significantly the risk of infertility in both men (recovery of oligospermia) and women (decreasing by 5 the risk of POI) and improves the chances of spontaneous pregnancy after completion of HL treatment. With the current follow-up the risk of SPM was low (2.7%) and similar in both arms. Disclosures Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brice:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Ghesquieres:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; CELGENE: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria. Stamatoulas Bastard:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Dupuis:Henri Mondor University Hospital Creteil France: Current Employment. Gac:Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Bouabdallah:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Genentech, Inc. Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. André:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium: Current Employment; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Karyopharm: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding. Meignan:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Demeestere:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; THERAMEX FERRING: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Introduction: Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are highly active in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), but most patients (pts) will still relapse. Given this, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains an important option for pts after PD-1 blockade, as it offers the possibility of cure. Prior reports have suggested that alloHSCT after PD-1 mAbs may be associated with severe immune-related complications including acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and cytokine release/febrile non-infectious syndrome (CRS). Prior studies of alloHSCT after PD-1 blockade in cHL have been limited by the small number of pts and short follow-up, preventing an accurate assessment of long-term outcomes and complications, risk factors for early toxicity, and the impact of transplant strategies such as choice of GVHD prophylaxis. We therefore assembled a large retrospective international cohort of cHL pts who underwent alloHSCT after PD-(L)1 blockade to better answer these questions, including an assessment of the impact of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) on efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Medical records and databases were reviewed at 26 European and United States transplant centers to identify pts with cHL who underwent an alloHSCT any time after receiving a PD-1 or PD-L1 mAb. Response assessment was performed by local investigators according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence (CumInc) of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute (a) and chronic (c) GVHD were estimated, as was the association between baseline variables and these outcomes. Results: Between 2014 and 2019, 150 pts were identified who underwent alloHSCT after a median of 10 (range, 1-74) doses of nivolumab (n=118), pembrolizumab (n=31), or avelumab (n=1). The median age was 31 (range 17-68) and pts had received a median of 4 (range, 2-11) lines of therapy prior to PD-(L)1 blockade. 138 pts (92%) had failed BV and 111 (74%) autologous HSCT. The best overall response to PD-(L)1 mAbs was CR for 62 pts (41%), PR for 55 (37%), SD for 17 (11%), PD for 15 (10%) and unknown for 1 (1%). Median time from last dose of PD-(L)1 mAb to alloHSCT was 80 days (range, 17-756) with 70 pts (47%) receiving intervening systemic therapy. At alloHSCT, 90 pts were in CR (60%), 45 in PR (30%), 5 in SD (3%), and 10 in PD (7%). Donors were haploidentical (n=71, 47%), matched sibling (n=29, 19%), matched unrelated (n=39, 26%), mismatched unrelated (n=7, 5%), cord blood (n=2, 1%), or unknown (n=2, 1%). Stem cell source was bone marrow (n=38, 25%), peripheral blood (n=110, 73%), or cord blood (n=2, 1%). GVHD prophylaxis included PTCy in 88 pts (59%) (69/71 (97%) with haploidentical donors; 19/79 (24%) with other donors). With a median post-alloHSCT follow-up for survivors of 23.8 months (range, 1-67), the 2y OS and PFS were 79% (95CI 71-86%) and 65% (95CI 55-73%), respectively, while the 2y CumIncs of relapse and NRM were 21% (95CI 13-29%) and 14%, (95CI, 8-22%), respectively (Fig. 1A-B). 27 pts have died, 3 due to disease and 24 to NRM, including aGVHD (n=7) and VOD (n=2). Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in 5 pts (day 100 CumInc 4%) and 29 pts (19%) developed CRS (grade 1 n=16; grade 2 n=7; grade 3 n=4; grade 4 n=2). The 6-month CumIncs of grade 2-4, grade 3-4 and grade 4 aGVHD were 39%, 16% and 8%, respectively. Hyperacute GVHD (onset ≤ 14 days after alloHSCT) occurred in 4% of pts and was fatal in 2 pts. The 2y CumInc of cGVHD was 45%. Neither receipt of > 10 doses (median) of anti-PD-(L)1 mAb nor undergoing alloHSCT ≤80 days (median) after last dose of PD-(L)1 mAb were associated with PFS or OS. However, pts with a shorter time to transplant (≤80 days) appeared to have a higher risk of severe (grade 3-4) aGVHD (6m CumInc 24% vs 9%, p=0.006). Recipients of PTCy in this cohort had lower 2y CumIncs of cGVHD (34% vs 58%, p=0.01) and relapse (12% vs 31%, p=0.02), superior 2y PFS (76% vs 54%, p=0.015), and similar rates of severe aGVHD (15% vs 18%, p=0.5), 2y NRM (12% vs 16%, p=0.5), and 2y OS (82% vs 78%, p=0.6). Conclusions: With extended follow-up of a large international cohort, our results argue that alloSCT performed after PD-(L)1 mAbs is a feasible strategy associated with an excellent PFS and a very low CIR for this disease. The use of PT-Cy appears to be associated with improved outcomes and may at present represent the optimal transplant strategy in this pt population. Figure Disclosures Corradini: kite: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Omeros Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Herrera:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria; Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hamadani:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Ansell:LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Feldman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. McGuirk:ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stamatoulas Bastard:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Houot:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Merck Sharp Dohme: Honoraria. Manson:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Orvain:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel & accommodations; Pfizer: Other: Travel & accommodations. Bouabdallah:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Frigault:Novartis: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Nkarta: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; Xenetic: Consultancy. Chen:Takeda: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Lynch:T.G. Therapeutics: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Johnson Graffe Keay Moniz & Wick LLP: Consultancy. Smith:AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb (spouse): Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Ignyta (spouse): Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Ayala (spouse): Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Byrne:Karyopharm: Research Funding. Cohen:Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding. Svoboda:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Santoro:Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Abb-Vie: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Lilly: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Armand:Sigma Tau: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tensha: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Infinity: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. Zinzani:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Carlo-Stella:Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations; Genenta Science srl: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Travel, accommodations; Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodations.

Introduction Patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) experience high response rates upon anti-PD1 therapy. In these patients, the optimal duration of treatment and the risk of relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation are unknown. Furthermore, the efficacy of anti-PD1 re-treatment in patients who relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation remains to be determined. Here, we investigated the risk of relapse in patients who responded to anti-PD1 therapy and discontinued the treatment, as well as the efficacy of anti-PD1 re-treatment in patients who relapsed after anti-PD1 discontinuation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R HL who responded to anti-PD1 monotherapy (concomitant radiotherapy was permitted) and discontinued the treatment either because of unacceptable toxicity or prolonged remission (based on the clinician's decision). Patients who discontinued because of relapse/progression or underwent consolidation with allogenic stem cell transplantation [alloSCT] were not included. A random forest machine-learning algorithm was trained to predict relapse using 14 candidate biomarkers. Finally, we analyzed the outcome of patients who relapsed after anti-PD1 discontinuation and their response to anti-PD1 re-treatment. Results We included 32 patients from 13 Centers in France, Portugal and Belgium. Patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1. At the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation, patients had received either nivolumab (N=27, 84.4%) or pembrolizumab (N=5, 12.5%) for a median duration of 14.6 (range, 0-33.5) months. Patients discontinued anti-PD1 treatment either because of prolonged remission (N=23, 71.9%) or unacceptable toxicity (N=9, 28.1%). Most patients were in CR (N=29, 90.1%) at the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months (range, 0.7-47.6) from anti-PD1 discontinuation, 21 (65.6%) patients had not relapsed/progressed. All 3 patients who were in PR at the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation had relapsed. Among the 29 patients who were in CR at the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation, the estimated disease-free survival was 64.3% (CI 95, 46.6-88.7%) at 24 months (Figure 1). Three patients died: two from disease progression and one from severe GVHD while in CR. Interestingly, 4 patients remain in CR more than 3 years after anti-PD1 discontinuation although these patients had received only short courses of anti-PD1 ( Among the 11 patients who relapsed, 7 were re-treated with (the same) anti-PD1 (Figure 2). Five achieved a CR, 1 achieved a PR and one patient has not been evaluated yet (but is in clinical response). Conclusion A significant proportion of patients experience prolonged remissions after anti-PD1 discontinuation and thus might be cured. Using a machine-learning algorithm, we identified biomarkers capable of predicting the risk of relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation. These biomarkers are currently being validated in an independent set of patients. Finally, among patients who relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation, re-treatment with anti-PD1 appears to be efficient. Disclosures Manson: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Brice:Takeda France: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Herbaux:Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Silva:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Stamatoulas Bastard:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Houot:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Merck Sharp Dohme: Honoraria.