Search

Subcutaneous daratumumab plus bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd; D-VCd) improved outcomes versus VCd for patients with newly diagnosed immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study. We report a subgroup analysis of Asian patients (Japan; Korea; China) from ANDROMEDA. Among 388 randomized patients, 60 were Asian (D-VCd, n = 29; VCd, n = 31). At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the overall hematologic complete response rate was higher for D-VCd versus VCd (58.6% vs. 9.7%; odds ratio, 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3–53.7; P P = 0.0036; renal, 57.1% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.4684). Major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) and major organ deterioration event-free survival (MOD-EFS) were improved with D-VCd versus VCd (MOD-PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06–0.75; P = 0.0079; MOD-EFS: HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05–0.54; P = 0.0007). Twelve deaths occurred (D-VCd, n = 3; VCd, n = 9). Twenty-two patients had baseline serologies indicating prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposure; no patient experienced HBV reactivation. Although grade 3/4 cytopenia rates were higher than in the global safety population, the safety profile of D-VCd in Asian patients was generally consistent with the global study population, regardless of body weight. These results support D-VCd use in Asian patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201965.

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been transformative in treating AL amyloidosis since the early nineties. Recently, the European Hematology Association (EHA) and International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) have developed a combined guideline for the management of patients undergoing an ASCT for AL amyloidosis.In this practitioner's perspective, we review the guideline, focusing on 6 major areas and offer practical advice for its application. We provide a perspective on the optimal use of ASCT and its potential application in the future.The EHA-ISA guideline comprehensively outlines the practicalities of performing an ASCT in AL amyloidosis. The critical aspect is careful patient selection. Vigilant fluid balance assessments are crucial as associated complications are common and dangerous. The role of ASCT is changing with improving hematological responses associated with novel agents. Evidence is limited for the use of ASCT in patients who achieve a complete hematological response (CR). Therefore, ASCT should be considered for those who only achieve a very good partial response (VGPR)/partial response (PR) and fulfil the strict selection criteria. Future research identifying the cohort who would benefit most from ASCT in the era of novel therapies is warranted.

Aims To assess the ability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to (i) measure changes in response to chemotherapy; (ii) assess the correlation between haematological response and changes in extracellular volume (ECV); and (iii) assess the association between changes in ECV and prognosis over and above existing predictors. Methods and results In total, 176 patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis were assessed using serial N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), echocardiography, free light chains and CMR with T1 and ECV mapping at diagnosis and subsequently 6, 12, and 24 months after starting chemotherapy. Haematological response was graded as complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or no response (NR). CMR response was graded by changes in ECV as progression (≥0.05 increase), stable ( Conclusions Cardiac amyloid deposits frequently regress following chemotherapy, but only in patients who achieve CR or VGPR. Changes in ECV predict outcome after adjusting for known predictors.

This guideline has been developed jointly by the European Society of Haematology and International Society of Amyloidosis recommending non-transplant chemotherapy treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis.A review of literature and grading of evidence as well as expert recommendations by the ESH and ISA guideline committees.The recommendations of this committee suggest that treatment follows the clinical presentation which determines treatment tolerance tempered by potential side effects to select and modify use of drugs in AL amyloidosis. All patients with AL amyloidosis should be considered for clinical trials where available. Daratumumab-VCD is recommended from most untreated patients (VCD or VMDex if daratumumab is unavailable). At relapse, the two guiding principles are the depth and duration of initial response, use of a class of agents not previously exposed as well as the limitation imposed by patients' fitness/frailty and end organ damage. Targeted agents like venetoclax need urgent prospective evaluation. Future prospective trials should include advanced stage patients to allow for evidence-based treatment decisions. Therapies targeting amyloid fibrils or those reducing the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic light chains/oligomers are urgently needed.

ObjectivesIn AL amyloidosis, organ response assessment is based on surrogates (eg, cardiac biomarkers). An objective functional test, such as the 6 min walk test (6MWT), capturing overall clinical improvement, is required. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the 6MWT at baseline and change following chemotherapy.MethodsThis study evaluated the outcomes of patients who enrolled in a prospective observational study at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2012–2017). Patients underwent comprehensive assessments inclusive of blood testing, echocardiogram and 6MWT at baseline and annually thereafter.ResultsIn total, 799 patients were included within the study. Median baseline 6 min walk distance (6MWD) was 362 m (IQR: 231 m). 6MWD progressively decreased with worsening cardiac disease stage (458 m, 404 m, 331 m and 168 m for cardiac Mayo stages I, II, IIIa and IIIb, respectively (pConclusionThe 6MWT is prognostic in AL amyloidosis. A baseline distance of ≥350 m independently predicts better survival. These data suggest that 6MWT has utility in AL amyloidosis for baseline prognosis and assessing response.

Aims To perform evaluation of widely embraced bone scintigraphy-based non-biopsy diagnostic criteria (NBDC) for ATTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in clinical practice, and to refine serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio cut-offs that reliably exclude monoclonal gammopathy (MG) in chronic kidney disease. Methods and results A multi-national retrospective study of 3354 patients with suspected or histologically proven cardiac amyloidosis (CA) referred to specialist centres from 2015 to 2021; evaluations included radionuclide bone scintigraphy, serum and urine immunofixation, sFLC assay, eGFR measurement and echocardiography. Seventy-nine percent (1636/2080) of patients with Perugini grade 2 or 3 radionuclide scans fulfilled NBDC for ATTR-CM through absence of a serum or urine monoclonal protein on immunofixation together with a sFLC ratio falling within revised cut-offs incorporating eGFR; 403 of these patients had amyloid on biopsy, all of which were ATTR type, and their survival was comparable to non-biopsied ATTR-CM patients (p = 0.10). Grade 0 radionuclide scans were present in 1091 patients, of whom 284 (26%) had CA, confirmed as AL type (AL-CA) in 276 (97%) and as ATTR-CM in only one case with an extremely rare TTR variant. Among 183 patients with grade 1 radionuclide scans, 122 had MG of whom 106 (87%) had AL-CA; 60/61 (98%) without MG had ATTR-CM. Conclusion The NBDC for ATTR-CM are highly specific [97% (95% CI 0.91-0.99)] in clinical setting, and diagnostic performance was further refined here using new cut-offs for sFLC ratio in patients with CKD. A grade 0 radionuclide scan all but excludes ATTR-CM but occurs in most patients with AL-CA. Grade 1 scans in patients with CA and no MG are strongly suggestive of early ATTR-type, but require urgent histologic corroboration.

In the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial, patients treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) had significantly higher rates of organ and hematologic response compared with patients who received VCd alone. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the ANDROMEDA trial. PROs were assessed through cycle 6 using three standardized questionnaires. Treatment effect through cycle 6 was measured by a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model. The magnitude of changes in PROs versus baseline was generally low, but between-group differences favored the D-VCd group. Results were generally consistent irrespective of hematologic, cardiac, or renal responses. More patients in the D-VCd group experienced meaningful improvements in PROs; median time to improvement was more rapid in the D-VCd group versus the VCd group. After cycle 6, patients in the D-VCd group received daratumumab monotherapy and their PRO assessments continued, with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) reported through cycle 19. PROs of subgroups with renal and cardiac involvement were consistent with those of the intent-to-treat population. These results demonstrate that the previously reported clinical benefits of D-VCd were achieved without decrement to patients' HRQoL and provide support of D-VCd in patients with AL amyloidosis.

AL amyloidosis is a systemic amyloidosis and is associated with an underlying plasma cell dyscrasia. High dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation was developed for the treatment of AL amyloidosis in the early 1990s and was prompted by its success in multiple myeloma. This application has evolved significantly over the past three decades. These guidelines provide a comprehensive assessment of eligibility criteria, stem cell collection and mobilisation strategies and regimens, risk-adapted melphalan dosing, role for induction and consolidation therapies, specific supportive care management, long-term outcome with respect to survival, haematologic response and relapse and organ responses following stem cell transplantation. These guidelines are developed by the experts in the field on behalf of the stem cell transplant working group of the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) and European Haematology Association (EHA).

Systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable disorder, and the natural history is incompletely understood. In this study, we describe its natural history based on an analysis of real-world longitudinal data. All patients seen at the National Amyloidosis Centre, UK, between February 2010 and August 2019 and treated with up-front bortezomib are included. In all, 1 276 patients received the first-line treatment; 259, 85, and 32 patients received second, third, and fourth treatment lines, respectively. Among patients requiring further treatment after the first line, 77·2% started the second line within two years of the first line; 50·5%, 50·6%, 40·1% and 40·6% of patients had achieved at least very good partial response after the first, second, third and fourth treatment lines. Median overall survival (OS) from first, second, third and fourth lines was 45 months, 56 months, 37 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0·109). In summary, although relapses occur in AL amyloidosis, the outcomes and responses do not worsen with each subsequent relapse, making it attractive to design therapeutics with curative intent.

In the first phase 3 study in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (TOURMALINE-AL1 NCT01659658), 168 patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis after 1–2 prior lines were randomized to ixazomib (4 mg, days 1, 8, 15) plus dexamethasone (20 mg, days 1, 8, 15, 22; n = 85) or physician’s choice (dexamethasone ± melphalan, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, or lenalidomide; n = 83) in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Primary endpoints were hematologic response rate and 2-year vital organ deterioration or mortality rate. Only the first primary endpoint was formally tested at this interim analysis. Best hematologic response rate was 53% with ixazomib–dexamethasone vs 51% with physician’s choice (p = 0.76). Complete response rate was 26 vs 18% (p = 0.22). Median time to vital organ deterioration or mortality was 34.8 vs 26.1 months (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32–0.87; p = 0.01). Median treatment duration was 11.7 vs 5.0 months. Adverse events of clinical importance included diarrhea (34 vs 30%), rash (33 vs 20%), cardiac arrhythmias (26 vs 15%), nausea (24 vs 14%). Despite not meeting the first primary endpoint, all time-to-event data favored ixazomib–dexamethasone. These results are clinically relevant to this relapsed/refractory patient population with no approved treatment options.

ObjectivesWild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (wtATTR-CM) is a progressive and fatal condition. Although prognosis can be determined at the time of diagnosis according to National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) stage, the clinical course varies substantially between individuals. There are currently no established measures of rate of disease progression. Through systematic analysis of functional, biochemical and echocardiographic disease-related variables we aimed to identify prognostic markers of disease progression in wtATTR-CM.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study of 432 patients with wtATTR-CM diagnosed at the UK NAC, none of whom received disease-modifying therapy. The association between mortality from the 12-month timepoint and change from diagnosis to 12 months in a variety of disease-related variables was explored using Cox regression.ResultsChange in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (∆ NT-proBNP) at 12 months from diagnosis was the strongest predictor of ongoing mortality and was independent of both change in other disease-related variables (HR 1.04 per 500 ng/L increase (95% CI 1.01 to 1.07); p=0.003) and a range of known prognostic variables at the time of diagnosis (HR 1.07 per 500 ng/L increase (95% CI 1.02 to 1.13); p=0.007). An increase in NT-proBNP of >500 ng/L, >1000 ng/L and >2000 ng/L during the first year of follow-up occurred in 45%, 35% and 16% of patients, respectively.ConclusionChange in NT-proBNP concentration during the first year of follow-up is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in wtATTR-CM.

Corresponding Author

Objectives The benefit of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis requires re-evaluation in the modern era. This retrospective case-matched study compares ASCT to bortezomib for the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis. Methods Newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis treated with ASCT or bortezomib between 2001 and 2018 were identified. Patients were excluded if the time from diagnosis to treatment exceeded 12 months. Patients were matched on a 1:1 basis, using a propensity-matched scoring approach. Results A total of 136 propensity score-matched patients were included (ASCT n = 68, bortezomib n = 68). There was no significant difference in overall survival at two years (P = .908, HR: 0.95, CI: 0.41-2.20). For ASCT vs bortezomib: overall haematological response rate at 6 months was 90.6% vs 92.5%; organ response at 12 months: cardiac (70.0% vs 54%, P > .999), renal (74% vs 24%, P = .463) liver (21% vs 22%, P = .048); median progression-free survival (50 vs 42 months P = .058, HR: 0.61, CI: 0.37-1.02) and time to next treatment (68 vs 45 months, P = .145, HR: 0.61, CI: 0.31-1.19). More patients required treatment in the bortezomib group compared to ASCT group at 24 months (41 vs 23, Chi-squared P = .004) and 48 months (57 vs 41, Chi-squared P = .004). Conclusions This small retrospective study suggests that there is no clear survival advantage of ASCT over bortezomib therapy. A prospective randomised controlled trial evaluating ASCT in AL amyloidosis is critically needed.

BackgroundOutcomes after renal transplantation have traditionally been poor in systemic amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis and systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis, with high mortality and frequent recurrent disease. We sought to compare outcomes with matched transplant recipients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and diabetic nephropathy (DN), and identify factors predictive of outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 51 systemic AL and 48 systemic AA amyloidosis patients undergoing renal transplantation. Matched groups were generated by propensity score matching. Patient and death-censored allograft survival were compared via Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, and assessment of clinicopathological features predicting outcomes via Cox proportional hazard analyses.ResultsOne-, 5- and 10-year death-censored unadjusted graft survival was, respectively, 94, 91 and 78% for AA amyloidosis, and 98, 93 and 93% for AL amyloidosis; median patient survival was 13.1 and 7.9 years, respectively. Patient survival in AL and AA amyloidosis was comparable to DN, but poorer than ADPKD [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.12 and 3.09, respectively; P 12 mm (HR = 26.58; P = 0.03), while survival was predicted by haematologic response (very good partial or complete response; HR = 0.07; P = 0.018). In AA amyloidosis, recurrent amyloid was associated with elevated serum amyloid A concentration but not with outcomes.ConclusionsRenal transplantation outcomes for selected patients with AA and AL amyloidosis are comparable to those with DN. In AL amyloidosis, IVSd thickness and achievement of deep haematologic response pre-transplant profoundly impact patient survival.

Lymphoma-related amyloidosis is a rare entity. Systemic AL amyloidosis is generally caused by an underlying plasma cell clone in the bone marrow with an intact monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgA protein. The rarity of the lymphoma-related amyloidosis makes the generation of data in randomized trials and the determination of the optimal treatment almost impossible. Therefore, treatment recommendations discussed here are based on either retrospective or small prospective trials of single centers.

Hereditary apolipoprotein A-I (AApoAI) amyloidosis is a rare heterogeneous disease with variable age of onset and organ involvement. There are few series detailing the natural history and outcomes of solid organ transplantation across a range of causative APOA1 gene mutations.We identified all patients with AApoAI amyloidosis who presented to the National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) between 1986 and 2019.In total, 57 patients with 14 different APOA1 mutations were identified including 18 patients who underwent renal transplantation (5 combined liver-kidney (LKT) and 2 combined heart-kidney (HKT) transplants). Median age of presentation was 43 years and median time from presentation to referral was 3 (0-31 years). Involvement of the kidneys, liver and heart by amyloid was detected in 81%, 67% and 28% of patients, respectively. Renal amyloidosis was universal in association with the most commonly identified variant (Gly26Arg,AApoAI amyloidosis is a slowly progressive disease that is challenging to diagnose. The outcomes of transplantation are encouraging and graft survival is excellent.

Depth of response is the critical determinant of prognosis in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Here, we aim to identify patients who are unlikely to improve response based on analysis of baseline characteristics and 1-month response. In a multivariate model, difference in involved amyloidogenic and uninvolved serum free light chains (dFLC) at diagnosis (dFLC400 mg/l, odds ratio [OR] 4.051, p 0.005) and no response at 1 month (OR 4.787, p 0.005) were significant predictors of no improvement in response. Only 5% of patients with a dFLC of400 mg/l and no response at 1 month improved their response (p 0.005). We suggest that these patients should switch treatment early, subject to their functional status.

Aims Cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR‐CM) is a progressive and fatal condition. Prognosis can be determined at diagnosis according to the National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) stage. We sought to examine how NAC ATTR stage changes during follow‐up and whether it maintains its prognostic value throughout the disease course. Methods and results We performed a retrospective study of 945 patients with wild‐type ATTR‐CM (wtATTR‐CM) or hereditary ATTR‐CM associated with the V122I variant (V122I‐hATTR‐CM) who were diagnosed and serially evaluated at the UK NAC. Patients who commenced any disease‐modifying therapy for amyloidosis were censored at the time of doing so. Landmark Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed at diagnosis (n = 945) and at 6 ± 1 (n = 432), 12 ± 3 (n = 562), and 24 ± 3 (n = 316) months and stratified by recalculated NAC ATTR stage at the relevant time point. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the prognostic significance during follow‐up of an increase in NAC ATTR stage from Stage I at diagnosis. Mortality in ATTR‐CM was predicted by NAC ATTR stage at each time point [Stage II vs. I, hazard ratios (HRs) 1.95–2.67; P

Although no therapies are approved for light chain (AL) amyloidosis, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) is considered standard of care. Based on outcomes of daratumumab in multiple myeloma (MM), the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study (NCT03201965) is evaluating daratumumab-CyBorD vs CyBorD in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. We report results of the 28-patient safety run-in. Patients received subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC) weekly in cycles 1 to 2, every 2 weeks in cycles 3 to 6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 2 years. CyBorD was given weekly for 6 cycles. Patients had a median of 2 involved organs (kidney, 68%; cardiac, 61%). Patients received a median of 16 (range, 1-23) treatment cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with DARA SC in MM and CyBorD. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 1 patient (grade 1). No grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred; 5 patients died, including 3 after transplant. Overall hematologic response rate was 96%, with a complete hematologic response in 15 (54%) patients; at least partial response occurred in 20, 22, and 17 patients at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Renal response occurred in 6 of 16, 7 of 15, and 10 of 15 patients, and cardiac response occurred in 6 of 16, 6 of 13, and 8 of 13 patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Hepatic response occurred in 2 of 3 patients at 12 months. Daratumumab-CyBorD was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns versus the intravenous formulation, and demonstrated robust hematologic and organ responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03201965.

Background: Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody, which targets CD38; an antigen expressed on malignant plasma cells in AL amyloidosis thus providing a rationale for its use.Method: Patients treated with daratumumab monotherapy (2016-2019) for relapsed/refractory systemic AL amyloidosis were identified from the database at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre.Results: Of 50 evaluable patients, haematological responses at 3 months were: CR - 19 (38%), VGPR - 14 (28%), PR - 9 (18%) and no response - 8 (16%). Median time to response was 1 (1-6) month. Of assessable patients, cardiac, renal and hepatic responses were seen in 43.8%, 25.0% and 0% of patients whilst progression occurred in 25.0%, 12.5% and 37.5% respectively. Patients achieving a CR had longer median OS (not reached vs. 22.7 months [95% CI 17.0-28.4 months]) (p = .036). Furthermore, patients achieving a rapid response (at 1 month) had a longer median PFS (not reached vs. 9 months [95% CI 5.8-12.2 months]) (p = .013).Conclusion: Daratumumab monotherapy is effective in multiply-relapsed systemic AL amyloidosis and should be considered, if available, in patients who have not received prior daratumumab therapy. Responses are achieved rapidly and overall response rate was 84%. CR predicts overall survival whilst speed of response is predictive of a longer PFS.

Systemic amyloidosis is a rare but increasingly recognised disease that is heterogeneous in presentation. Early diagnosis, whilst imperative, remains challenging but can improve prognosis and limit organ dysfunction. An increased repertoire of diagnostic imaging and histological techniques are becoming mainstream and promise to aid early diagnosis. Better risk stratification, via biomarkers and cytogenetics, has improved multidisciplinary treatment decisions. The use of novel agents has improved treatment efficacy, which translates into survival benefit. Newer strategies targeting pre-deposited amyloidogenic protein are under investigation. The current paper reviews available data relating to the most recent advances in the field of systemic amyloidosis.

Background Development of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplantation has not been reported, although plasma cell neoplasms are a rare form of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, which could be complicated by light chain amyloidosis (AL) amyloidosis. Methods We searched our database of 5112 patients seen between 1994 and 2018 with a diagnosis of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplant. Patients were excluded if the amyloid diagnosis preceded the transplant date. The indication and type of organ transplant were recorded in addition to the amyloidosis type, organs involved, treatment given, and survival. Results Thirty patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis with amyloidosis was 52 years (range 33-77). The median time from transplantation to diagnosis was 10.5 years (0.58-36). The grafts were kidney (N = 25, 83.3%), liver (N = 2, 6.7%), heart (N = 2, 6.7%), and combined heart, lung, and kidney (N = 1, 3.3%). The type of amyloidosis was systemic AL (N = 14, 47%), serum amyloid A amyloidosis (AA) (N = 11, 37%), localized AL (N = 3, 10%), wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) (N = 1, 3.3%), and amyloid of uncertain type (N = 1, 3.3%). Renal graft dysfunction was seen in 11 of 25 (44%) cases. Median graft survival was 185 months (96-269), and median survival from diagnosis with amyloidosis was 45 months (2-89); median survival by amyloidosis type was localized AL: 64 months (20-67), systemic AL: 23.5 months (0-95), ATTR amyloidosis: 17 months, and AA, 15 months (0-77). Conclusions This series is the first description of amyloidosis post solid-organ transplant; 30 cases among 5112 amyloid patients >24 years suggests that amyloidosis may occur post solid-organ transplantation with an overall poor survival.

With improving outcomes in amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, there is a need to study novel agents in this setting. We report outcomes of 40 patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (IRd). Haematological responses were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis at three months: complete response (CR) - 8 (20·5%), very good partial response (VGPR) - 8 (20·5%), partial response (PR) - 7 (17·9%) and no response (NR) - 16 (41·0%). One patient had missing data. Six patients subsequently improved response. Best responses were: CR - 10 (25·6%), VGPR - 8 (20·5%), PR - 7 (17·9%), NR - 14 (35·9%). Cardiac and renal organ responses occurred in 5·6% and 13·3% respectively. Median progession-free survival (PFS) was 17·0 months (95% CI 7·3-20·7 months), improving to 28·8 months (95% CI 20·6-37·0 months) in those achieving CR/VGPR. Median overall survival was 29·1 months (95% CI 24-33 months). Serious adverse events were seen in 14 (35·0%) patients inclusive of 15 admissions due to: infection (6/15, 40·0%), fluid overload (5/15, 33·3%), cardiac arrhythmia (2/15, 13·3%), renal dysfunction (1/15, 6·6%) and anaemia (1/15, 6·6%). In summary, IRd is an oral treatment option with a manageable toxicity profile leading to deep responses in 47% of patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis.

Objective Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic herpesvirus, and reactivation of infection is possible in immunocompromised patients. Historically, the risk for haematology patients is restricted to those treated with an allogeneic transplant or T-cell depleting agents. Bortezomib is a highly efficacious proteasome inhibitor widely used to treat multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients. The objective of this small prospective study was to quantify the risk of CMV reactivation associated with bortezomib treatment. Methods Fifty-seven consecutive multiple myeloma or AL amyloidosis patients commencing bortezomib-based therapy were included. Viral copy numbers were established at baseline and then at fortnightly intervals during treatment. Pre-emptive anti-viral treatment was initiated in patients with a viral load >7500 copies/mL. Results Reactivation of CMV was detected in 39% (n = 12/31) of seropositive bortezomib treated patients compared with 0% of CMV seronegative patients. Detectable DNAemia developed during the first two cycles of treatment in 83% (n = 10/12) patients. Anti-viral treatment was initiated in 42% (n = 5/12), but no cases of active CMV disease were seen. Conclusion This study suggests that there is a substantial risk of CMV reactivation in CMV-seropositive plasma cell dyscrasia patients treated with bortezomib.

Objectives This study aimed to assess the diagnostic use of native T1 to detect cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in a large prospective cohort of patients referred for suspected systemic amyloidosis. Background CA is a progressive and fatal underdiagnosed cause of heart failure. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an extremely useful test for the non-invasive diagnosis of CA, but administration of contrast is still required to make a diagnosis. Methods In this study, 868 patients with suspected CA referred between 2015 and 2017 underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 mapping, and an array of clinical investigations. Results The final diagnosis was cardiac light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in 222, cardiac transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis in 214, and no cardiac involvement in 427 cases. T1 was significantly elevated in both types of CA and this was associated with high diagnostic accuracy in the overall population (area under the curve, 0.93). A native T1 1,164 ms was associated with 98% positive predictive value for CA. We propose the use of these cut-offs to exclude or confirm CA and to restrict the administration of contrast only to patients with intermediate probability (native T1 between 1,036 and 1,164 ms), 58% of patients in this population. Conclusions Native myocardial T1 enables diagnosis of CA to be made without need for gadolinium contrast in a large proportion of patients with suspected systemic amyloidosis. We propose a diagnostic algorithm for non-contrast CMR applicable to patients with suspected amyloidosis.

Bortezomib is a standard therapy in light-chain amyloidosis (AL), but little is known about response duration. A difference in involved amyloidogenic and uninvolved serum-free light chains (dFLC)10 mg/L (low dFLC response) predicts survival in AL patients with low presenting dFLC (20-50 mg/L). We report outcomes in the largest AL cohort treated with upfront bortezomib and explore the impact of posttreatment dFLC10 mg/L ("stringent dFLC response"). A total of 915 newly diagnosed AL patients treated with bortezomib and assessed at our center were included. Hematologic responses, 6-month dFLC, organ responses, overall survival (OS), and time-to-next-treatment (TNT) (excluded patients who died without starting second-line treatment) were evaluated. Overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 65%, with 49% complete response (CR)/very good partial response/low dFLC response and with a stringent dFLC response, dFLC 10-40 mg/L, and dFLC40 mg/L was 30%, 22%, and 48%, respectively. Median OS was 72 months. A total of 289 patients died without progressing to second-line treatment. Median TNT was not reached, and 55% had not progressed to further treatment at 7 years. Patients with stringent dFLC responses had significantly better OS and TNT than did those with lesser responses. A total of 72% of CR patients did not progress to further treatment at 3 years compared with 84% with stringent dFLC responses. Cardiac responses were better in those with stringent dFLC responses (61%) compared with lesser responses (45%; P = .005). Upfront bortezomib confers durable hematologic responses. A stringent dFLC response predicts prolonged TNT and impressive organ responses.

Patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis and severe cardiac dysfunction have a poor prognosis. Treatment options that induce rapid and deep hematologic and organ responses, irrespective of cardiac involvement, are needed.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of baseline cardiac stage on efficacy and safety outcomes in the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial.Rates of overall complete hematologic response and cardiac and renal response at 6 months and median major organ deterioration-progression-free survival and major organ deterioration-event-free survival were compared across cardiac stages (I, II, or IIIA) and treatments (daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone [D-VCd] or bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone [VCd]). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were summarized for patients with and without baseline cardiac involvement and by cardiac stage.Median follow-up duration was 15.7 months. The proportions of stage I, II, and IIIA patients were 23.2%, 40.2%, and 36.6%. Across cardiac stages, hematologic and organ response rates were higher and major organ deterioration-progression-free survival and major organ deterioration-event-free survival were longer with D-VCd than VCd. AE rates were similar between treatments and by cardiac stage; serious AE rates were higher in patients with cardiac involvement and increased with increasing cardiac stage. The incidence of cardiac events was numerically greater with D-VCd vs VCd, but the rate of grade 3 or 4 events was similar. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for cardiac events was lower with D-VCd than VCd (median exposure 13.4 and 5.3 months, respectively).These findings demonstrate the efficacy of D-VCd over VCd in patients with newly diagnosed amyloid light chain amyloidosis across cardiac stages, thus supporting its use in patients with cardiac involvement. (NCT03201965).

BackgroundThe treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment.Results198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group.ConclusionThese data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments.