Search

Background Immune-based therapies are standard-of-care treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring hospitalization. However, safety concerns related to the potential risk of secondary infections may limit their use. Methods We searched OVID Medline, Ovid EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and PROSPERO in October 2020 and updated the search in November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Pairs of reviewers screened abstracts and full studies and extracted data in an independent manner. We used RevMan to conduct a meta-analysis using random-effects models to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI for the incidence of infection. Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic. We assessed risk of bias for all studies and rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. We conducted a meta-regression using the R package to meta-explore whether age, sex, and invasive mechanical ventilation modified risk of infection with immune-based therapies. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021229406). Results This was a meta-analysis of 37 RCTs including 32 621 participants (mean age, 60 years; 64% male). The use of immune-based therapy for COVID-19 conferred mild protection for the occurrence of secondary infections (711/15 721, 4.5%, vs 616/16 900, 3.6%; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71–0.95; P = .008; I2 = 28%). A subgroup analysis did not identify any subgroup effect by type of immune-based therapies (P = .85). A meta-regression revealed no impact of age, sex, or mechanical ventilation on the effect of immune-based therapies on risk of infection. Conclusions We identified moderate-certainty evidence that the use of immune-based therapies in COVID-19 requiring hospitalization does not increase the risk of secondary infections.

Summary Background The classic geographical range of histoplasmosis in North America primarily includes the states and provinces adjacent to the Ohio, Mississippi, and St Lawrence riverways. Although Alberta, Canada is not typically considered a region of risk for histoplasmosis, cases with suspected local acquisition have been reported. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology and geographical distribution of cases of histoplasmosis in Alberta to assess evidence for local acquisition of infections, using genomic analysis for corroboration. Methods We did an epidemiological and genomic investigation, in which laboratory-confirmed cases of histoplasmosis were reviewed in Alberta from 2011, when the disease became reportable, until 2018. We used data attained from Alberta Health. Travel and exposure histories and clinical features were reviewed. Definite local acquisition was defined as a case without previous travel outside Alberta or associated with a common-source outbreak within the province, whereas probable local acquisition was a sporadic case with travel outside Alberta but compelling local exposures. Genomes of selected case isolates were analysed, including those from cases suspected to have been locally acquired and imported. Findings Between Jan 1, 2011, and June 30, 2018, 45 cases of histoplasmosis were identified. Participants had a median age of 53 years (range 17–77) and 32 [71%] were male. Among 34 patients with documented travel histories, ten (29%) had never left the province. 11 cases were of definite local acquisition, including eight cases from three common-source outbreaks and three sporadic cases in patients who had never travelled outside Alberta. The common-source outbreaks all involved exposure to bats or their droppings in chimneys or attics of private dwellings or churches. Four patients had travelled outside Alberta but compelling evidence was seen for local exposure to bat guano. Genome sequencing showed that isolates from cases of definite and probable local acquisition clustered together and were genetically distinct from isolates from suspected imported cases and other published isolates. Interpretation Using epidemiological and genomic analyses, we established that cases of histoplasmosis have been acquired in Alberta, thus expanding the geographical range of Histoplasma spp much further northwest than was previously appreciated. Histoplasmosis should be considered in patients with compatible symptoms outside areas of classic geographical risk. Funding None.

SOURCE CITATION: Boulware DR, Pullen MF, Bangdiwala AS, et al. A randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:517-25. 32492293.

Background Histoplasmosis is a serious fungal infection caused by the geographically restricted, dimorphic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum. In Canada, the geographic range of H. capsulatum is classically thought to be restricted to southern parts of Ontario and Quebec. Over the past decade, histoplasmosis has occasionally been diagnosed in patients in Alberta without travel to areas of known geographic risk (Figure 1). We studied the epidemiology and geographic distribution of histoplasmosis in Alberta to assess evidence for locally-acquired infections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all laboratory-confirmed (culture, antigen and/or immunodiffusion positive) cases of histoplasmosis diagnosed from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2018. Data collected by public health and clinical charts were reviewed for clinical presentation, exposure and travel histories, and geographic distribution of cases. Cases of histoplasmosis in patients who had not left Alberta or associated with a local point source were classified as definite local acquisition; cases in patients with remote travel but with local exposures and appropriate timing of disease onset were deemed “probable” cases of local infection. University of Alberta’s Research Ethics Board approved this study. Results We identified 45 laboratory-confirmed cases of histoplasmosis, including 17 cases that were locally acquired. Among these, there were 12 cases of definite local acquisition, including 8 patients from 3 point-source outbreaks—all involving exposure to bats and/or their droppings in chimneys or attics of private dwellings or churches—and 4 sporadic cases in patients who had never traveled. Of the other 5 cases probably acquired in Alberta, patients had previously traveled (n = 4) or travel history was incomplete (n = 1) but local exposures preceding infection were considered compelling. The mean incidence rate of locally acquired infection was 0.062/100,000 population with incidence increasing since 2014. Table 1 shows features of locally acquired cases. Conclusion This study, for the first time, establishes Alberta as a region of geographic risk for histoplasmosis. The diagnosis should be considered in patients with compatible symptoms and exposure history, even in the absence of travel. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.