Search

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab significantly improves clinical outcomes in advanced/metastatic microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) solid tumors but is not well studied in the neoadjuvant space. METHODS This is a phase II open-label, single-center trial of localized unresectable or high-risk resectable MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Treatment is pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 6 months followed by surgical resection with an option to continue therapy for 1 year followed by observation. To continue on study, patients are required to have radiographic or clinical benefit. The coprimary end points are safety and pathologic complete response. Key secondary end points are response rate and organ-sparing at one year for patients who declined surgery. Exploratory analyses include interrogation of the tumor immune microenvironment using imaging mass cytometry. RESULTS A total of 35 patients were enrolled, including 27 patients with colorectal cancer and eight patients with noncolorectal cancer. Among 33 evaluable patients, best overall response rate was 82%. Among 17 (49%) patients who underwent surgery, the pathologic complete response rate was 65%. Ten patients elected to receive one year of pembrolizumab followed by surveillance without surgical resection (median follow-up of 23 weeks [range, 0-54 weeks]). An additional eight did not undergo surgical resection and received less than 1 year of pembrolizumab. During the study course of the trial and subsequent follow-up, progression events were seen in six patients (four of whom underwent salvage surgery). There were no new safety signals. Spatial immune profiling with imaging mass cytometry noted a significantly closer proximity between granulocytic cells and cytotoxic T cells in patients with progressive events compared with those without progression. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in dMMR/MSI-H cancers is safe and resulted in high rates of pathologic, radiographic, and endoscopic response, which has implications for organ-sparing strategies.

The survival benefit of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) is well established. However, reasons for underutilization of chemotherapy are unknown.The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for metastatic GEP-NECs from 2009 to 2016. The cohort was stratified by patients who had received chemotherapy and who did not receive chemotherapy. Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were captured. Multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with chemotherapy utilization.Of the 2367 stage IV GEP-NECs patients identified, 1647 (69.6%) received chemotherapy. Patients with primary site at colon and small bowel, age ≥75, no insurance, and ≥2 comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with other primary sites, age75, private insurance, and no comorbidities (P 0.005). The small bowel and colon were the primary sites with the greatest percentage of patients who received surgery (46.4% and 41.8%, respectively). In these subgroup of patients, surgical intervention was also associated with lower probability of receiving chemotherapy (odds ratio = 0.60, P 0.005).About 30% of patients with metastatic GEP-NECs did not receive chemotherapy. Primary site location and receipt of surgery were significantly associated with receipt of chemotherapy, with NECs in small bowel and colon being more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy. While surgery may be considered on an individual basis, increasing efforts to ensure patients with colon or small bowel NECs receive guideline-concordant chemotherapy will positively impact survival. In addition, interventions to improve health insurance coverage to increase receipt of chemotherapy are warranted.

Identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following curative intent therapies is a surrogate for microscopic residual disease for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinically, in micrometastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer, increased TGFβ signaling results in exclusion of antitumor cytotoxic T cells from the tumor microenvironment. Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGFβRII receptor (“TGFβ trap”) and anti-PD-L1 antibody. Patients with liver-limited, MSS mCRC and with detected ctDNA after complete resection of all known tumors and standard-of-care therapy were treated with 1,200 mg of BA intravenously every 14 days for six doses. The primary endpoint was ctDNA clearance. Radiographic characteristics at recurrence were compared using independent t tests to historical data from a similar cohort of patients with liver-limited mCRC who underwent observation. Only 4 of 15 planned patients received BA before the study was stopped early for loss of equipoise. There was no grade ≥3 adverse event. None of the patients cleared ctDNA. All patients developed radiographic recurrence by the first planned restaging. Although not detectable at prior to treatment, TGFβ3 was found in circulation in all patients at cycle 2 day 1. Compared with a historical cohort, patients administered BA developed more metastases (15 vs. 2, P = 0.005) and greater tumor volumes (9 cm vs. 2 cm, P = 0.05). Treatment with BA in patients with ctDNA-detected, liver-limited mCRC did not clear ctDNA and was associated with large-volume recurrence, highlighting the potential context-specific complexity of dual TGFβ and PD-L1 inhibition. Significance: Use of ctDNA to identify patients with micrometastatic disease for therapeutic intervention is feasible. Treatment with BA in patients with liver-limited mCRC and with detectable ctDNA after resection generated rapid progression. Approaches targeting TGFβ signaling must consider its pathway complexity in future immunotherapy combination strategies.

Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors. However, not all MSI-H/dMMR patients will exhibit the same ICB efficacy. Previous studies suggest that concomitant antibiotic use while receiving ICB may result in poorer outcomes. We aimed to evaluate this association in patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials and Methods A single-site, retrospective review of 57 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that received ICB was completed. Data collected included patient demographics, ICB information, and antibiotic use. Antibiotic exposure was considered from 90 days prior to ICB through 6 weeks after initiation. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Results The majority of patients received pembrolizumab (27 [47%]) or nivolumab (17 [30%]) monotherapy as their ICB agent. Of the 57 patients, 19 (33.3%) had antibiotic exposure from 90 days prior to ICB initiation through 6 weeks after initiation with most (13 [68%]) having antibiotic use in the 30 days preceding ICB initiation. Similar ORRs were seen in both groups (P-value > .99). No difference was observed in OS (P-value .29) or PFS (P-value .36) between groups. Conclusion Our data show no association of lower response rates or survival in those MSI-H/dMMR patients with mCRC who receive antibiotics around the initiation of ICB. This information needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort.

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases are an important cause of preventable local failure in rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and oncological outcomes following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed surgical selection for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT).A retrospective consecutive cohort analysis was performed of rectal cancer patients with enlarged LPLN on pretreatment MRI. Patients were categorized as LPLND or non-LPLND. The main outcomes were lateral local recurrence rate, perioperative and oncological outcomes and factors associated with decision making for LPLND.A total of 158 patients with enlarged pretreatment LPLN and treated with TNT were identified. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range 10-32). After multidisciplinary review, 88 patients (56.0%) underwent LPLND. Mean age was 53 (SD±12) years, and 54 (34.2%) were female. Total operative time (509 vs 429 minutes; P =0.003) was greater in the LPLND group, but median blood loss ( P =0.70) or rates of major morbidity (19.3% vs 17.0%) did not differ. LPLNs were pathologically positive in 34.1%. The 3-year lateral local recurrence rates (3.4% vs 4.6%; P =0.85) did not differ between groups. Patients with LPLNs demonstrating pretreatment heterogeneity and irregular margin (odds ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.65-8.82) or with short-axis ≥5 mm post-TNT (odds ratio 2.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.19-6.08) were more likely to undergo LPLND.For rectal cancer patients with evidence of LPLN metastasis, the appropriate selection of patients for LPLND can be facilitated by a multidisciplinary MRI-directed approach with no significant difference in perioperative or oncologic outcomes.

High grade neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are a rare disease entity for which there is a limited amount of prospective data available. It has also been relatively recent that a distinction has been made between G3 NET and NEC, further complicating the approach for management. Due to the overall lack of data in this space, much of the practice for treatment of these tumors is based on expect opinion. The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) is an organization composed of experts who specialize in the management of these tumors. In an effort to provide further guidance to the oncology community in regard to the management of these rare tumors, NANETS convened a panel of experts from medical oncology, surgery, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, radiology, pathology and radiation oncology to address critical issues surrounding the management of G3 NET and NEC that would benefit from expert consensus opinion. Here we present the recommendations from this panel of neuroendocrine experts in regard to the management of high grade, extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC).

Surufatinib, is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1–3; fibroblast growth factor receptor-1; colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. This Phase 1/1b escalation/expansion study in US patients with solid tumors evaluated 5 once daily (QD) surufatinib doses (3 + 3 design) to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and efficacy at the RP2D in 4 disease-specific expansion cohorts including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [pNET] and extrapancreatic NETs [epNET]. MTD and RP2D were 300 mg QD (escalation [n = 35]); 5 patients (15.6%) (Dose Limiting Toxicity [DLT] Evaluable Set [n = 32]) had DLTs. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Estimated progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 11 months were 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.7, 78.2) and 51.1% (95% CI: 12.8, 80.3) for pNET and epNET expansion cohorts, respectively. Median PFS was 15.2 (95% CI: 5.2, not evaluable) and 11.5 (95% CI: 6.5,11.5) months. Response rates were 18.8% and 6.3%. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (both cohorts) were fatigue (46.9%), hypertension (43.8%), proteinuria (37.5%), diarrhea (34.4%). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor efficacy of 300 mg QD oral surufatinib in US patients with pNETs and epNETs are consistent with previously reported studies in China and may support applicability of earlier surufatinib studies in US patients. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02549937.

Supplemental Figure S2

Supplemental Table S3

Identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following curative intent therapies is a surrogate for microscopic residual disease for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinically, in micrometastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer, increased TGFβ signaling results in exclusion of antitumor cytotoxic T cells from the tumor microenvironment. Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGFβRII receptor (“TGFβ trap”) and anti-PD-L1 antibody. Patients with liver-limited, MSS mCRC and with detected ctDNA after complete resection of all known tumors and standard-of-care therapy were treated with 1,200 mg of BA intravenously every 14 days for six doses. The primary endpoint was ctDNA clearance. Radiographic characteristics at recurrence were compared using independent t tests to historical data from a similar cohort of patients with liver-limited mCRC who underwent observation. Only 4 of 15 planned patients received BA before the study was stopped early for loss of equipoise. There was no grade ≥3 adverse event. None of the patients cleared ctDNA. All patients developed radiographic recurrence by the first planned restaging. Although not detectable at prior to treatment, TGFβ3 was found in circulation in all patients at cycle 2 day 1. Compared with a historical cohort, patients administered BA developed more metastases (15 vs. 2, P = 0.005) and greater tumor volumes (9 cm vs. 2 cm, P = 0.05). Treatment with BA in patients with ctDNA-detected, liver-limited mCRC did not clear ctDNA and was associated with large-volume recurrence, highlighting the potential context-specific complexity of dual TGFβ and PD-L1 inhibition.Significance:Use of ctDNA to identify patients with micrometastatic disease for therapeutic intervention is feasible. Treatment with BA in patients with liver-limited mCRC and with detectable ctDNA after resection generated rapid progression. Approaches targeting TGFβ signaling must consider its pathway complexity in future immunotherapy combination strategies.

Purpose: Aberrant activation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase Src has been implicated as a mechanism of acquired chemotherapy resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, the oral tyrosine kinase Src inhibitor, dasatinib, was investigated in combination with FOLFOX and cetuximab.Experimental Design: We performed a phase IB/II study of 77 patients with previously treated mCRC. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. Using a 3 + 3 design, patients received FOLFOX6 with cetuximab and escalating doses of dasatinib (100, 150, 200 mg daily), followed by a 12-patient expansion cohort at 150 mg. Phase II studies evaluated FOLFOX plus dasatinib 100 mg in KRAS c12/13mut patients or in combination with cetuximab if KRAS c12/13WT. FAK and paxillin were utilized as surrogate blood biomarkers of Src inhibition, and paired biopsies of liver metastases were obtained in patients in the expansion cohort.Results: In phase IB, the DLTs were grade 3/4 fatigue (20%) and neutropenia (23%). In phase II, grade 3/4 fatigue (23%) and pleural effusions (11%) were present. Response rates were 20% (6 of 30) in the phase IB escalation and expansion cohort and 13% (3 of 24) and 0% (0 of 23) in the KRAS c12/13WT and mutant cohorts of phase II, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.6, 2.3, and 2.3 months, respectively. There was no evidence of Src inhibition based on surrogate blood biomarkers or paired tumor biopsies.Conclusions: The combination of dasatinib plus FOLFOX with or without cetuximab showed only modest clinical activity in refractory colorectal cancer. This appears to be primarily due to a failure to fully inhibit Src at the achievable doses of dasatinib. The combination of dasatinib plus FOLFOX with or without cetuximab did not show meaningful clinical activity in refractory colorectal cancer due to failure to fully inhibit Src. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4146–54. ©2017 AACR.

Comparison of overall survival based on primary tumor side using a multivariate proportional hazards model controlling for co-variates that differed based on tumor location.

Validation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a biomarker of Src inhibition. Freshly collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a healthy volunteer were treated ex-vivo with dasatinib 300 nM or hydrogen peroxide 0.05 mM. The peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates were generated and immunoblotted for phosphoFAK [Y861] and phophopaxillin [Y118].

Sensitivity analysis comparing mutation prevalence estimates by site of biopsy of tissue used for next generation sequencing panel in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Operating characteristics. A summary of the probability of stopping the trial early for the indicated true response rates.

Supplemental legend

Purpose: Dysregulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Src signaling pathways commonly occur in colorectal cancer. Mutations in the PIK3CA gene are associated with an increase in severity of disease and worse clinical outcomes. Elevated levels of Src have been identified in premalignant lesions and are suggested to play a central role in tumor progression. Because these pathways appear to enhance tumor growth and metastasis, molecularly targeted agents for both pathways are currently being evaluated in early-phase clinical trials.Experimental Design: We used colorectal cancer cell lines and a patient-derived explant model to investigate the efficacy of saracatinib. Mutations in the PIK3CA were evaluated to examine the association between mutations in the PIK3CA gene and sensitivity to saracatinib.Results: We have identified a subset of patients with a PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20) mutation with increased sensitivity to saracatinib. A novel 3′ untranslated region (UTR) mutation was also shown to be associated with increased sensitivity to saracatinib and have a reduced affinity for miR-520a and miR-525a. Importantly, we show that Src inhibition reduces the interaction between Src and p85, subsequently decreasing Akt-dependent signaling.Conclusion: These results indicate that a personalized approach in targeting Src in PIK3CA-mutant patients with colorectal cancers may prove effective in a subset of patients with this genetic alteration. Clin Cancer Res; 18(9); 2704–14. ©2012 AACR.

Supplemental material

PDF file - 295K, The effects of saracatinib on proliferation of CRC cell lines. Twenty-three CRC cell lines were treated with saracatinib (0.0625 um uM) and assayed by SRB 72 hours after exposure to drug. Cell lines (H508, LS180 and LS174T) with an IC50 less than 1 uM were considered sensitive to saracatinib. Cell lines are listed in order from the most resistant to the most sensitive; (R) = resistant, (S) = sensitive. PIK3CA (wt) and (mut) are shown for each cell line. Sup. Table 1: Saracatinib effects, PIK3CA and KRAS mutational status in CRC cell lines. Sup. Table 2: Patient characteristics of CRC explants and distribution of PIK3CA mutations; Sup. Table 3: Src gene copy (FISH) in CRC cell lines and explants. A Src copy number of �3 was considered a gain and < 3 was considered no gain. A significant association (p = 0.0469) was identified between increase in Src gene copy number and resistance to saracatinib.

Lack of correlation between Src activity in PBMCs and hepatic tumors. For the patients in the expansion cohort, the change in the expression of pSrc and total Src was not correlated with a change in the phosphorlyation of the Src substrate paxillin. Patients with no change or a decrease in the expression of pSrc or Src from baseline to C2D8 were included in the "no increase" category.

Supplemental Figure Legends

Purpose: To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for continuous oral administration of the γ-secretase inhibitor PF-03084014, determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and preliminary activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.Experimental Design: This open-label, phase I study consisted of a dose-finding portion based on a 3+3 design, followed by an expansion cohort. PF-03084014 was administered orally, twice daily (BID) for 21 continuous days. Tested doses ranged from 20 to 330 mg BID. In the expansion cohort, patients were to receive the estimated MTD or a lower dose of PF-03084014.Results: A total of 64 patients received treatment. The MTD was estimated to be 220 mg BID. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg BID, based on the better safety profile versus the 220-mg BID dose, given comparable NOTCH-related target inhibition. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, vomiting, rash, and decreased appetite, which were generally mild to moderate in severity. One patient with advanced thyroid cancer had a complete response, and five of seven response-evaluable patients with desmoid tumor achieved a partial response (71.4% objective response rate). Tumor responses were mostly durable, ranging from 1.74+ to 24+ months. PF-03084014 demonstrated a generally dose-dependent pharmacokinetic profile at doses ranging from 20 to 330 mg BID. Consistent downmodulation of NOTCH-related HES4 gene expression was observed in peripheral blood from all evaluable patients.Conclusion: Further development of PF-03084014 for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors is warranted and currently under evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(1); 60–67. ©2014 AACR.See related commentary by Hughes et al., p. 7

Summary of the relative prognostic and mutational impact of tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer. Sub-caption: Relative prevalence of mutations at each site was compared to the median prevalence across all sites and used to calculate relative font size for each gene name. Hazard ratios displayed in the figure utilize rectal location as the reference category.

Sensitivity analysis demonstrating optimal left vs right cut-point to maximize prognostic differences based on side in metastatic colorectal cancer. Sub-caption: Numbers in figure represent the hazard ratio followed by the 95% confidence interval within square brackets. The hazard ratio estimate occurs at the location used to divide left from right in each sensitivity analysis. For example, if the division between right and left occurs between the hepatic flexure and transverse colon, the hazard ratio estimate will be placed on the graph half way between the hepatic flexure and transverse colon (ie. 1.66).

Purpose: Colorectal cancers are classified as right/left-sided based on whether they occur before/after the splenic flexure, with established differences in molecular subtypes and outcomes. However, it is unclear if this division is optimal and whether precise tumor location provides further information.Experimental Design: In 1,876 patients with colorectal cancer, we compared mutation prevalence and overall survival (OS) according to side and location. Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) was compared in a separate cohort of 608 patients.Results: Mutation prevalence differed by side and location for TP53, KRAS, BRAFV600, PIK3CA, SMAD4, CTNNB1, GNAS, and PTEN. Within left- and right-sided tumors, there remained substantial variations in mutation rates. For example, within right-sided tumors, RAS mutations decreased from 70% for cecal, to 43% for hepatic flexure location (P = 0.0001), while BRAFV600 mutations increased from 10% to 22% between the same locations (P < 0.0001). Within left-sided tumors, the sigmoid and rectal region had more TP53 mutations (P = 0.027), less PIK3CA (P = 0.0009), BRAF (P = 0.0033), or CTNNB1 mutations (P < 0.0001), and less MSI (P < 0.0001) than other left-sided locations. Despite this, a left/right division preceding the transverse colon maximized prognostic differences by side and transverse colon tumors had K-modes mutation clustering that appeared more left than right sided. CMS profiles showed a decline in CMS1 and CMS3 and rise in CMS2 prevalence moving distally.Conclusions: Current right/left classifications may not fully recapitulate regional variations in tumor biology. Specifically, the sigmoid-rectal region appears unique and the transverse colon is distinct from other right-sided locations. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1062–72. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Dienstmann, p. 989

Supplemental Table S1. Tumor responses to single-agent treatment with PF-03084014 in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Prespecified dose modifications for adverse events related to study drug in Phase IB and Phase II.

Supplemental Figure S1 and Figure S2. Figure S1: Pharmacokinetic profiles of PF-03084014 following administration to patients with solid malignancies. Figure S2. Downregulation of Hes4 gene expression following treatment with PF-03084014 in patients with solid malignancies.

Symptom-specific dose adjustment tables.

Supplementary Figure 2A from Oxidative Stress Induces Premature Senescence by Stimulating Caveolin-1 Gene Transcription through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Sp1–Mediated Activation of Two GC-Rich Promoter Elements

Supplementary Figure 1B from Oxidative Stress Induces Premature Senescence by Stimulating Caveolin-1 Gene Transcription through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Sp1–Mediated Activation of Two GC-Rich Promoter Elements

Supplementary Figures 4A and B from Oxidative Stress Induces Premature Senescence by Stimulating Caveolin-1 Gene Transcription through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Sp1–Mediated Activation of Two GC-Rich Promoter Elements

Supplementary Figure 1 Legend from Oxidative Stress Induces Premature Senescence by Stimulating Caveolin-1 Gene Transcription through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Sp1–Mediated Activation of Two GC-Rich Promoter Elements

Supplementary Figure 3A from Oxidative Stress Induces Premature Senescence by Stimulating Caveolin-1 Gene Transcription through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Sp1–Mediated Activation of Two GC-Rich Promoter Elements

Cellular senescence is believed to represent a natural tumor suppressor mechanism. We have previously shown that up-regulation of caveolin-1 was required for oxidative stress–induced premature senescence in fibroblasts. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying caveolin-1 up-regulation in senescent cells remain unknown. Here, we show that subcytotoxic oxidative stress generated by hydrogen peroxide application promotes premature senescence and stimulates the activity of a (−1,296) caveolin-1 promoter reporter gene construct in fibroblasts. Functional deletion analysis mapped the oxidative stress response elements of the mouse caveolin-1 promoter to the sequences −244/−222 and −124/−101. The hydrogen peroxide–mediated activation of both Cav-1 (−244/−222) and Cav-1 (−124/−101) was prevented by the antioxidant quercetin. Combination of electrophoretic mobility shift studies, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, Sp1 overexpression experiments, as well as promoter mutagenesis identifies enhanced Sp1 binding to two GC-boxes at −238/−231 and −118/−106 as the core mechanism of oxidative stress–triggered caveolin-1 transactivation. In addition, signaling studies show p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as the upstream regulator of Sp1-mediated activation of the caveolin-1 promoter following oxidative stress. Inhibition of p38 MAPK prevents the oxidant-induced Sp1-mediated up-regulation of caveolin-1 protein expression and development of premature senescence. Finally, we show that oxidative stress induces p38-mediated up-regulation of caveolin-1 and premature senescence in normal human mammary epithelial cells but not in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, which do not express caveolin-1 and undergo apoptosis. This study delineates for the first time the molecular mechanisms that modulate caveolin-1 gene transcription upon oxidative stress and brings new insights into the redox control of cellular senescence in both normal and cancer cells. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(22): 10805-14)

Background Although the gastrointestinal tract (including the pancreas, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) is the most common site for extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), the current treatment patterns of locoregional GEP NEC and in particular, the role of surgical resection is unclear. Methods Data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 were used for this study. Results Of 2314 GEP NEC cases (stages I–III), 52.5% were stage III. Colon was the most common site (30%); 30.9% of all cases were small cell morphology. Age, morphology, stage, and primary site were associated with significant differences in treatment patterns. Management of NEC mimicked that of adenocarcinomas arising at the respective sites: colon NEC most likely to be treated with surgery and chemotherapy; anal and esophageal NEC was primarily likely to receive chemotherapy and radiation, and rectal NEC mostly likely to receive trimodality therapy. However, 25%-40% of patients did not undergo surgical resection even at sites typically managed with curative resection, and there was a trend toward lesser resection over time. The prognostic impact of surgical resection was significant across all stages and correlated with variations in survival across primary sites. Even in patients undergoing chemoradiation, surgery was the only prognostic variable that significantly affected survival in stages I–II patients (HR 0.63) and showed a strong trend in stage III (HR 0.77) patients. Conclusions Treatment patterns in GEP NEC vary considerably according to stage and primary tumor site. Surgery significantly improved survival in stages I–II patients and showed a strong trend in stage III patients regardless of primary tumor location and other perioperative therapies.