1. Targeted Temperature Management for 48 vs 24 Hours and Neurologic Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest:A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Author
-
Kirkegaard, Hans, Søreide, Eldar, de Haas, Inge, Pettilä, Ville, Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Arus, Urmet, Storm, Christian, Hassager, Christian, Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk, Sørensen, Christina Ankjær, Ilkjær, Susanne, Jeppesen, Anni Nørgaard, Grejs, Anders Morten, Duez, Christophe Henri Valdemar, Hjort, Jakob, Larsen, Alf Inge, Toome, Valdo, Tiainen, Marjaana, Hästbacka, Johanna, Laitio, Timo, Skrifvars, Markus B, Kirkegaard, Hans, Søreide, Eldar, de Haas, Inge, Pettilä, Ville, Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Arus, Urmet, Storm, Christian, Hassager, Christian, Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk, Sørensen, Christina Ankjær, Ilkjær, Susanne, Jeppesen, Anni Nørgaard, Grejs, Anders Morten, Duez, Christophe Henri Valdemar, Hjort, Jakob, Larsen, Alf Inge, Toome, Valdo, Tiainen, Marjaana, Hästbacka, Johanna, Laitio, Timo, and Skrifvars, Markus B
- Abstract
Importance: International resuscitation guidelines recommend targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33°C to 36°C in unconscious patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for at least 24 hours, but the optimal duration of TTM is uncertain.Objective: To determine whether TTM at 33°C for 48 hours results in better neurologic outcomes compared with currently recommended, standard, 24-hour TTM.Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an international, investigator-initiated, blinded-outcome-assessor, parallel, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized clinical superiority trial in 10 intensive care units (ICUs) at 10 university hospitals in 6 European countries. Three hundred fifty-five adult, unconscious patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were enrolled from February 16, 2013, to June 1, 2016, with final follow-up on December 27, 2016.Interventions: Patients were randomized to TTM (33 ± 1°C) for 48 hours (n = 176) or 24 hours (n = 179), followed by gradual rewarming of 0.5°C per hour until reaching 37°C.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month neurologic outcome, with a Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score of 1 or 2 used to define favorable outcome. Secondary outcomes included 6-month mortality, including time to death, the occurrence of adverse events, and intensive care unit resource use.Results: In 355 patients who were randomized (mean age, 60 years; 295 [83%] men), 351 (99%) completed the trial. Of these patients, 69% (120/175) in the 48-hour group had a favorable outcome at 6 months compared with 64% (112/176) in the 24-hour group (difference, 4.9%; 95% CI, -5% to 14.8%; relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93-1.25; P = .33). Six-month mortality was 27% (48/175) in the 48-hour group and 34% (60/177) in the 24-hour group (difference, -6.5%; 95% CI, -16.1% to 3.1%; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.11; P = .19). There was no significant difference in the time to mortality between the 48-hour group and t
- Published
- 2017