Search

Evaluating sustainable land management (SLM) practices have regional to worldwide implications. It is imperative to develop SLM under particular soil type, climate, and cropping sequence following area‐specific best management practices to harness maximum profitability. The alternative land‐use system (ALUS—natural forest, pasture, cashew, areca nut, coconut) on hills and agricultural land‐use system (AGLUS—rice–rice, rice–pulse) in the coastal plains of Goa State in west coast India were evaluated in this study. This study assessed the impact of sustainable land‐use management practices on different fractions of soil organic carbon (SOC), its stock, and soil quality index (SQI) under the ALUS and AGLUS. The total SOC stocks under different land‐use systems varied from 14.4 Mg C ha−1 in rice–rice rotations to 133.7 Mg C ha−1 in cashew. The lability index, available nutrients, and biochemical properties were higher in ALUS. The variation in the levels of SOC and soil quality was due to land use and management practices. The results indicated land use with areca nut (SQI = 0.8) on the hills and rice–pulses (SQI = 0.25) rotations on the coast had maintained soil quality of high order. We recommend promoting sustainable agriculture with ALUS on the hills and AGLUS on the coastal plains of Goa State to enhance SOC storage, improve soil quality, and increase farmers' income. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Although blood donation by apheresis is very safe, it is essential to identify the adverse reactions that happen and address the factors related to it so as to improve the donation experience both to the donors and the center accepting donations. This study was designed to assess the frequency of adverse reaction in donors undergoing apheresis for platelet donation and delineate the factors associated with the occurrence of such adverse donor reactions, if any. Methodology: This was an analytical retrospective study on the available data of all the donors who donated single-donor apheretic platelets in our blood center from January 2014 to October 2018. Results: The overall donor reaction rate was 8.3%, with the majority (4.7%) being a local reaction in the form of a hematoma. The other 3.6% were systemic reactions, among which 2.1% were citrate reactions and 1.5% vasovagal reactions (VVRs). The variables associated with a VVR were body weight <75 kg and diastolic blood pressure of <70 mmHg, whereas for citrate-related toxicities, it was the duration of the procedure and the amount of anticoagulant used. 4.7% of them were localized reactions in the form of the hematoma, which were more common in first-time donors. Conclusion: Adverse donor reactions to plateletpheresis are notable (8.3%) but generally mild. Auditing them to look for factors associated helps us review the policies and improve competencies among the staff to improve the safety of donors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which aims to set a free online database for iSCAR primers in eight plants. The study chose five fruit including strawberry, papaya, cacao, banana and apple, and three vegetable crops including melon, tomato and potato. It shows that different iSCAR primers were generated with the use of the software and input files of nucleotide sequences of every target species and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primer sequence.