Search

ObjectiveWe aimed to compile evidence for the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for the peripheral arthritis domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for the revised 2021 Group in Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations.MethodsA working group consisting of clinicians and patient research partners was convened. We reviewed the evidence from new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for PsA treatment from February 19, 2013, to August 28, 2020. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-informed approach to derive evidence for the classes of therapeutic options for 3 patient groups: (1) naïve to treatment, (2) inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and (3) inadequate response to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Recommendations were derived through consensus meetings.ResultsThe evidence review included 69 RCTs. We derived GRADE evidence for each class of therapeutic options and achieved consensus for the recommendations. For patients naïve to treatment, the working group strongly recommends csDMARDs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide) and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, and emphasizes regular assessment and early escalation to achieve treatment target. bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi], interleukin 17 inhibitors [IL-17i], IL-12/23i, IL-23i) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are also strongly recommended. For patients with inadequate response to csDMARDs, we strongly recommend TNFi, IL-17i, IL-12/23i, IL-23i, and JAKi. For those who had prior experience with bDMARDs, we strongly recommend a second TNFi, IL-17i, IL-23i, and JAKi. The evidence supporting nonpharmacological interventions was very low. An expert panel conditionally recommends adequate physical activity, smoking cessation, and diet to control weight gain.ConclusionEvidence supporting optimal therapy for the peripheral arthritis domain of PsA was compiled for the revised 2021 GRAPPA treatment recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have established the efficacy of brodalumab in treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Real-world evidence is needed to fully evaluate the drug.OBJECTIVE: Here we investigate drug survival and clinical effectiveness of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a real-world setting.METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study enrolling patients receiving brodalumab for psoriasis at the Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The primary endpoints were drug survival, reasons for discontinuation, percentage of patients achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 and clinical effectiveness against psoriatic arthritis.RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included (mean age 49.2 ± 17.4 years, 59.0% male, 9.6% bio-naïve, mean baseline PASI 10.9 ± 6.9). Twenty-seven patients discontinued treatment primarily due to ineffectiveness and adverse events (AEs). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-year drug survival was 65.7%. An absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 was achieved by 68.2% of patients at end of follow-up, by 70.0% at weeks 12-17 and by 76.2% after 40-60 weeks of treatment. Neither drug survival nor PASI ≤ 2 was associated with baseline PASI ≥ 10, body mass index ≥ 30, previous treatment with > 2 biologics or other IL-17 inhibitors in particular (P > 0.05). Psoriatic arthritis remission or partial remission was achieved by 10 out of 18 patients with psoriatic arthritis; treatment failure was reported in 5 patients.CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab was effective against psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a real-world setting. The drug survival was lower than reported in other real-world settings.

Background: The development of novel treatment strategies of immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis (IMIA) is still a clinical unmet need. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is activated by environmental stressors, growth factors and inflammatory cytokines. However, the inhibition of central MAPK proteins has so far had undesirable side effects. The MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) is a downstream mediator in the MAPK signaling pathway. Objectives: The objective of this study was to explore the effects of a small molecule inhibiting MK2 on synovial fluid mononuclear cells from patients with IMIA. Methods: Synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) were obtained from a study population consisting of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with at least one swollen joint (for obtaining synovial fluid) (n = 11). SFMCs were cultured for 48 h with and without the MK2 inhibitor CC0786512 at 1000 nM, 333 nM and 111 nM and cell free supernatants were harvested and frozen before they were analyzed by the Olink proseek multiplex interferon panel. Results: In SFMCs cultured for 48 h, the MK2 inhibitor decreased the production of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) (P < 0.001), CXCL10 (P < 0.01), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (P < 0.01), CXCL11 (P < 0.01), tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) (P < 0.05), and interleukin 12B (IL-12B) (P < 0.05) and increased the production of CXCL5 (P < 0.0001), CXCL1 (P < 0.0001), CXCL6 (P < 0.001), transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα) (P = 0.01), monocyte-chemotactic protein 3 (MCP-3) (P < 0.01), latency-associated peptide (LAP) TGFβ (P < 0.05) dose-dependently. Conclusions: This study reveals the downstream effects of MK2 inhibition on the secretory profile of SFMCs. Specifically, C-X-C motif chemokine receptors 3 (CXCR3) chemokines were decreased and CXCR2 chemokines were increased. This shift in the chemokine milieu may be one of the mechanisms behind the anti-inflammatory effects of MK2 inhibitors.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the risk of haematological malignancies in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) overall, and in relation to treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).MethodsWe identified that patients with PsA starting a first TNFi from the clinical rheumatology registers (CRR) in the five Nordic countries (n=10 621) and biologics-naïve PsA patients from (1) the CRR (n=18 705) and (2) the national patient registers (NPR, n=27 286, Sweden and Denmark) from 2006 through 2019. For Sweden and Denmark, general population comparators were matched 5:1 to PsA patients on birth year, year at start of follow-up and sex. By linkage to the national cancer registers in all countries, we collected information on haematological malignancies overall, and categorised into lymphoid or myeloid types. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using modified Poisson regression for TNFi-treated versus biologics-naïve PsA patients and versus the general population adjusted for age, sex, calendar period and country.ResultsDuring 59 827 person-years, 40 haematological malignancies occurred among TNFi-treated patients with PsA resulting in a pooled IRR of 0.96 (0.68–1.35) versus biologics-naïve PsA from CRR and an IRR of 0.84 (0.64–1.10) versus biologics-naïve PsA from NPR. The IRR of haematological malignancies in PsA overall versus general population comparators was 1.35 (1.17–1.55). The estimates were largely similar for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.ConclusionsTreatment with TNFi in patients with PsA was not associated with an increased incidence of haematological malignancies. Conversely, a moderately increased underlying risk was seen in patients with PsA compared with the general population.

First of all, we would like to thank Dr Kaltsonoudis et al for their interest in our study. Dr Kaltsonoudis et al 1 have raised an interesting suggestion in their correspondence based on their study from 2014.2 They suggest that all patients who are candidates for tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) therapy should have a thorough neurological assessment (including brain MRI and neurophysiological tests) before commencing TNFi treatment. Moreover, they believe that the risk of neuroinflammatory events following treatment with TNFis is not disease-dependent, but agent-dependent, and that part of the observed risks following treatment …

OBJECTIVE: Drug survival is an important proxy measure for effectiveness of treatments for inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and psoriasis. The objective of this study was to examine the real-life drug survival of biologics and novel small-molecule therapies across various disease entities such as RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis.METHODS: We performed a nationwide cohort study using the prospective nationwide registries DANBIO and DERMBIO, comprising all patients treated with biologics or novel small-molecule therapies for RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis between January 2015 through May 2021 (DANBIO) and November 2009 to November 2019 (DERMBIO). Drug survival was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of discontinuing therapy.FINDINGS: The study comprised a total of 12,089 patients (17,903 treatment series), including 5,104 RA patients (7,867 series), 2,157 AxSpA patients (3,016 series3), 2,551 PsA patients (3,313 series), and 2,577 psoriasis patients (3,707 series). In confounder-adjusted models drug survival in RA was highest for rituximab followed by baricitinib, etanercept and tocilizumab respectively. For AxSpA, drug survival was high for golimumab compared to all other drugs, followed by secukinumab and etanercept and lowest for infliximab. For PsA, tofacitinib and infliximab had the lowest drug survival compared to all other drugs. All other drugs performed almost equally well with a tendency of a somewhat higher drug survival for golimumab, followed by secukinumab and ixekizumab. For psoriasis, drug survival was generally highest for guselkumab.INTERPRETATION: Differing treatment responses to drugs with various modes of action across RA, AxSpA, PsA and psoriasis emphasize that although these diseases have many overlaps in their pathogenesis, there is a need for an individualized treatment approach that considers the underlying disease, patient profile, and treatment history.FUNDING: None.

Objectives Serious infection is a concern for patients with inflammatory joint diseases treated with biological drugs (bDMARDs). The objectives were to compare risk of serious infection, defined as infection leading to hospitalization, in patients initiating bDMARD treatment with the general population and, second, to develop a simple clinical prediction model and to obtain risk estimates for individual patients. Methods Matched-cohort study based on nationwide registries in Denmark. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis initiating first bDMARD monitored in the DANBIO registry were matched 1:10 by age, gender and postal code with controls from the general population. The risk of serious infection during 12 months’ follow-up was assessed with Cox regression. Prediction models were developed using logistic regression and compared using area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results We included 11 372 patients and 113 715 controls. During follow-up, 522 patients (4.6%) and 1,434 controls (1.3%) developed a serious infection (hazard ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.4–4.1). Age-stratified risk was largely similar across diagnoses. A simple prediction model, the “DANBIO infection risk score” based on age and a count of six clinical risk factors had moderate discriminative power (internal validation: AUC 0.69), which was comparable to that of the existing RABBIT risk score (external validation: AUC 0.68). Conclusion Patients with inflammatory joint diseases initiating bDMARD treatment had four times increased risk of serious infection compared with the general population. A simple prediction model, feasible for shared decision-making, was developed to obtain risk estimates for individual patients.

Background Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and debilitating disease that can be managed by different clinical specialists. Objectives The objective of theLOOPstudy was to evaluate the impact of clinical specialty setting on the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with PsA. Clinical disease activity and disease burden were also compared between clinical settings. Methods LOOPwas a cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted in 17 countries in Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. Adult patients (>= 18 years) with a suspected or established diagnosis of PsA who were routinely visiting a rheumatologist, dermatologist or non-rheumatology/non-dermatology physician were enrolled. All patients were assessed by both a rheumatologist and a dermatologist. Results Of 1483 enrolled patients, a total of 1273 had a confirmed diagnosis of PsA. There was no significant difference in the median time from onset of inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms to PsA diagnosis between patients enrolled by rheumatologists and dermatologists (6.0 vs. 3.9 months). However, the median time from diagnosis to first treatment with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) was significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting compared with the dermatology setting (0 vs. 2.0 months;P < 0.001). In addition, disease activity was significantly higher in the dermatology setting compared with the rheumatology setting. Conclusions Differences in the management and clinical status of patients with PsA were observed between the rheumatology and dermatology settings. Importantly, median time from diagnosis to first csDMARDwas significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting, and patients in the dermatology setting had higher disease activity. These data show the importance of improved collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists. AbbVie

ObjectivesAccording to guidelines, a nationwide non-medical switch from originator (INX, Remicade) to biosimilar infliximab (Remsima, CT-P13) was conducted in Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). We investigated disease activity before/after switching and retention rates in the DANBIO registry.MethodsDisease activities 3 months before and after switch and changes over time were calculated. Flare was defined as change in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score (∆DAS28) ≥1.2 (RA/PsA) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (∆ASDAS) ≥1.3 (AxSpA). Crude and adjusted retention rates were compared with a historic cohort of INX-treated patients.ResultsEight hundred and two patients switched (403 RA/120 PsA/279 AxSpA; 51% women, age (median (IQR): 55 (44-66)) years). Follow-up was 413 (339–442) days. Prior INX treatment duration was 6.8 (4.3–9.5) years. Disease activities were similar 3 months before/after switch. Crude 1-year CT-P13 retention rate (84.1 (95% CI 81.3 to 86.5)) was similar to the historic IFX cohort (86.2 (95% CI 84.0 to 88.0), p=0.22). The adjusted absolute retention rates were 83.4 (95% CI 80.8 to 86.2) and 86.8% (95% CI 84.8 to 88.8), respectively (p=0.03). In total 132 patients withdrew (lack of effect: 71/132=54%, adverse events: 37/132=28%). Patients with previous INX treatment duration >5 years had longer CT-P13 retention.ConclusionIn 802 arthritis patients treated with INX for median >6 years, a nationwide non-medical switch to CT-P13 had no negative impact on disease activity. Adjusted 1-year CT-P13 retention rate was slightly lower than for INX in a historic cohort.

© 2001-2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia, The GO-DACT is an investigator-initiated, national, multicentric randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded trial, that assesses dactylitis as primary endpoint. Psoriatic arthritis patients naïve to methotrexate and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, with at least one active dactylitis, were assigned to golimumab in combination with methotrexate or placebo in combination with methotrexate, for 24 weeks. Both clinical (dactylitis severity score and the Leeds dactylitis index) and imaging (high resolution magnetic resonance imaging), among others, were assessed as outcomes. The main objective of GO-DACT is to provide evidence to improve the treatment algorithm and care of psoriatic arthritis patients with active dactylitis. In this manuscript we describe the GO-DACT protocol and general concepts of the methodology of this trial.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on disease activity, use of analgesics, and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Method: Patients with established PsA (n = 145) were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The participants received a supplement of 3 g n-3 PUFA/day or 3 g olive oil/day (control) for 24 weeks. Outcome measures for disease activity, use of analgesics, and leukotriene formation from activated granulocytes were assessed at baseline and at study end. Results: In total, 145 patients were included and 133 completed the study. After 24 weeks, the n-3 PUFA group showed a decrease in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP), 68 tender joint count, enthesitis score, and psoriasis area and severity index, although not significantly different from the controls. There was a significant reduction in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and paracetamol use compared with controls (p = 0.04). In addition, the participants in the n-3 PUFA group had significantly lower formation of leukotriene B 4 (p = 0.004) from stimulated granulocytes and significantly higher formation of leukotriene B 5 (p 4 formation in the n-3 PUFA group compared with controls.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of treatment switching and outcomes among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who switched tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi) agents in routine care.METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study based on the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20)/ACR50/ACR70, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria for good response, and the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) (remission). Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were used for drug survival analyses and to identify predictors of outcome after treatment switching.RESULTS: Of 1,422 patients starting TNFi agents, 548 patients (39%) switched to a second biologic drug during up to 10 years of followup. Median followup was 2.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.0-4.3 years). Switchers were more frequently women (56% versus 45%), had a shorter disease duration (3 versus 4 years), a higher median Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (1.1 [IQR 0.6-1.6] versus 0.9 [IQR 0.5-1.4]), DAS28 (4.8 [4.0-5.7] versus 4.4 [3.6-5.2]), pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS) (65 mm [46-77] versus 62 mm [40-75]), and fatigue score on a VAS (69 mm [50-83] versus 64 mm [42-80] mm) (all P < 0.05 at start of first TNFi). During the first and second treatment, HAQ, DAS28, and VAS scores and C-reactive protein levels had decreased after 6 months (all P < 0.05), and median drug survival was 2.2 versus 1.3 years (P < 0.001). Lower fatigue score increased survival of the second TNFi. After switching, the proportions of patients achieving a sustained ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, EULAR good response, and DAS28 remission after 3-6 months were 22% (number needed to treat [NNT] 4.5), 13% (NNT 7.9), 5% (NNT 20), 19% (NNT 5.3), and 34% (NNT 2.9), respectively. Response rates were lower during the second treatment (all P < 0.01 versus first TNFi). At the 2-year visit, 47% of switchers had achieved an ACR20 response. No differences between drug-drug combinations were found.CONCLUSION: Thirty-nine percent of the patients with PsA switched TNFi agents. Response rates and drug survival were lower after switching; however, half of the switchers had an ACR20 response 2 years after starting the first TNFi.

Am J Med