Search

OBJECTIVE Clinical outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment are highly time sensitive. Remote robotic (RR)–EVT systems may be capable of mitigating time delays in patient transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive/thrombectomy-capable stroke center. However, health economic evidence is needed to assess the costs and benefits of an RR-EVT system. Therefore, the authors of this study aimed to determine whether performing RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC as opposed to standard of care might translate to cost-effectiveness over a lifetime. METHODS An economic evaluation study was performed from a US healthcare perspective, combining decision analysis and Markov modeling methods over a lifetime horizon to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC compared to the standard-of-care approach. Total expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS In the cost-effectiveness analysis, RR-EVT yielded greater effectiveness per patient (4.05 vs 3.88 QALYs) and lower costs (US$321,269 vs US$321,397) than the standard-of-care approach. Owing to these lower costs and greater health benefits, RR-EVT was the dominant cost-effective strategy. After initiation of an RR-EVT system, the average costs per year were similar (or slightly reduced), according to this simulation. Sensitivity analyses revealed that RR-EVT remains cost-effective in a wide variety of time delays and cost assumptions. In a one-way sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT remained the most cost-effective strategy when time delays were greater than 2.5 minutes, its complication rate did not exceed 37%, and costs were lower than $54,081. When the cost of the RR-EVT strategy ranged from $19,340 to $54,081 and its complication rate varied from 15% to 37%, the RR-EVT strategy remained the most cost-effective throughout the two ranges. RR-EVT was also the most cost-effective strategy even when its cost doubled (to approximately $40,000) and time delays exceeded 20 minutes. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 89.8% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests that RR-EVT as an innovative solution to expedite EVT is cost-effective. An RR-EVT system could potentially extend access to care in underserved communities and rural areas, as well as improve care for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations affected by health inequities.

BackgroundRapid time to reperfusion is essential to minimize morbidity and mortality in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to evaluate the workflow times when utilizing a direct-to-angiography suite (DTAS) pathway for patients with suspected stroke presenting at a comprehensive stroke center compared with a conventional CT pathway.MethodsWe developed a discrete-event simulation (DES) model to evaluate DTAS workflow timelines compared with a conventional CT pathway, varying the admission NIHSS score treatment eligibility criteria. Model parameters were estimated based on 2 year observational data from our institution. Sensitivity analyses of simulation parameters were performed to assess the impact of patient volume and baseline utilization of angiography suites on workflow times utilizing DTAS.ResultsSimulation modeling of stroke patients (SimStroke) demonstrated door-to-reperfusion time savings of 0.2–3.5 min (p=0.05) for a range of DTAS eligibility criteria (ie, last known well to arrival ConclusionsThe results of the SimStroke model showed comparable time intervals for door-to-reperfusion for DTAS compared with a conventional stroke care pathway. However, the DTAS pathway was very sensitive to baseline angiography suite utilization, with even a 10% increase eliminating the advantages of DTAS compared with the conventional pathway. Given the minimal time savings modeled here, further investigation of implementing the DTAS pathway in clinical care is warranted.

lthough intravenous contrast in neuroimaging has become increasingly important in selecting patients for stroke treatment, clinical concerns remain regarding contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Given the increasing utilization of CT angiography and/or perfusion coupled with cerebral angiography, the purpose of this study was to assess the association of CA-AKI and multi-dose iodinated contrast in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.etrospective review of AIS patients at a comprehensive stroke center was performed from January 2018 to December 2019. Data collection included patient demographics, stroke risk factors, stroke severity, discharge disposition, modified Rankin Scale, contrast type/volume, and creatinine levels (baseline, 48-72 h). CA-AKI was defined as creatinine increase ≥ 25 % from baseline. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were implemented to compare AIS patients with multi-dose and single-dose contrast.Of 440 AIS patients, 215 (48.9 %) were exposed to a single-dose contrast, and 225 (51.1 %) received multi-dose. In single-dose patients, CA-AKI at 48/72 h was 9.7 %/10.2 % compared to 8.0 %/8.9 % in multi-dose patients. Multi-dose patients were significantly more likely to receive a higher volume of contrast (mean 142.1 mL versus 80.8 mL; p lt; 0.001), but there was no significant difference in their creatinine levels or CA-AKI. NIHSS score (OR=1.08, 95 % CI=[1.04,1.13]), and patient transfer from another hospital (OR=3.84, 95 % CI=[1.94,7.62]) were significantly associated with multi-dose contrast.No significant association between multi-dose iodinated contrast and CA-AKI was seen in AIS patients. Concerns of CA-AKI should not deter physicians from pursuing timely and appropriate contrast-enhanced neuroimaging that may optimize treatment outcomes in AIS patients.

Recurrent stroke patients suffer significant morbidity and mortality, representing almost 30% of the stroke population. Our objective was to determine the clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent ischemic stroke (recurrent-IS).Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020192709). Following PRISMA guidelines, our medical librarian conducted a search in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL (last performed on August 25, 2020).(1) Studies reporting clinical outcomes and/or costs of recurrent-IS; (2) Original research published in English in year 2010 or later; (3) Study participants aged ≥18 years.(1) Case reports/studies, abstracts/posters, Editorial letters/reviews; (2) Studies analyzing interventions other than intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Four independent reviewers selected studies with review of titles/abstracts and full-text, and performed data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by a senior independent arbitrator. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.Initial search yielded 20,428 studies. Based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 studies were selected, consisting of 24,499 recurrent-IS patients. In 5 studies, recurrent-IS ranged from 4.4-56.8% of the ischemic stroke cohorts at 3 or 12 months, or undefined follow-up. Mean age was 60-80 years and female proportions were 38.5-61.1%. Clinical outcomes included mortality 11.6-25.9% for in-hospital, 30-days, or 4-years (3 studies). In one study from the U.S., mean in-hospital costs were $17,121(SD-$53,693) and 1-year disability costs were $34,639(SD-$76,586) per patient.Our study highlights the paucity of data on clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent-IS and identifies gaps in existing literature to direct future research.