Search

TK2d is an ultrarare autosomal recessive mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. Nucleoside therapy improves or stabilizes disease across key outcomes including survival, ambulation, and requirement for mechanical ventilation. However, little is known about the effects of nucleoside therapy treatment of TK2d from the patient's perspective. This study sought to address this knowledge gap. Participants with TK2d and/or their parents/caregivers completed online surveys with standardized health measures and interviews. During interviews, participants rated and described TK2d's impact on 13 quality of life domains, changes since starting nucleoside therapy, and if they would recommend nucleoside therapy. Twenty-five individuals participated (17 adults with TK2d, 4 parent-participant pairs, 4 parents of children with TK2d). Adult participants with TK2d had clinically meaningfully worse scores than the general population on global physical and mental health, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, and social function. Children's mobility and pain interference were significantly worse than the general pediatric population. Physical domains most affected by TK2d were: mobility (84%), fatigue (60%), respiratory function (56%), and hospitalizations (55%). Psychosocial domains most affected were: impact on family members (39%), mood (36%), and social life (28%). Most (77%) treated patients reported improvement; whereas, 67% in the untreated group reported worsening. All participants would recommend nucleoside therapy. In summary, TK2d has significant negative impacts on most areas of life and function. Measures of fatigue, sleep, swallowing/eating, speaking, and mood, should be considered as outcomes in clinical trials and research studies. Nucleoside therapy appears to provide meaningful improvements across many health domains affected by TK2d. SYNOPSIS: The consequences of having TK2d are devastating for both those with the disorder and their families; however, nucleoside therapy appears to provide meaningful improvements across many health domains affected by TK2d.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of fenfluramine (FFA) on the expected mortality incidence, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), in persons with Dravet syndrome (DS). METHODS: In this pooled analysis, total time of exposure for persons with DS who were treated with FFA in phase 3 clinical trials, in United States and European Early Access Programs, and in two long-term open-label observational studies in Belgium was calculated. Literature was searched for reports of SUDEP mortality in DS, which were utilized as a comparison. Mortality rates were expressed per 1000 person-years. RESULTS: A total of 732 persons with DS were treated with FFA, representing a total of 1185.3 person-years of exposure. Three deaths occurred, all in the phase 3 program: one during placebo treatment (probable SUDEP) and two during treatment with FFA (one probable SUDEP and one definite SUDEP). The all-cause and SUDEP mortality rates during treatment with FFA was 1.7 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 0.4 to 6.7), a value lower than the all-cause estimate of 15.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 9.9 to 25.4) and SUDEP estimate of 9.3 (95% CI, 5.0 to 17.3) reported by Cooper et al. (Epilepsy Res 2016;128:43-7) for persons with DS receiving standard-of-care. CONCLUSION: All-cause and SUDEP mortality rates in DS patients treated with FFA were substantially lower than in literature reports. Further studies are warranted to confirm that FFA reduces SUDEP risk in DS patients and to better understand the potential mechanism(s) by which FFA lowers SUDEP risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02926898, NCT02682927, NCT02826863, NCT02823145, NCT03780127. ispartof: SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY vol:93 pages:154-159 ispartof: location:England status: published

OBJECTIVE The number, unpredictability, and severity of seizures experienced by patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) negatively impact quality of life (QOL) for patients, caregivers, and families. Metrics are needed to assess whether patients with residual seizures have moved meaningfully toward seizure freedom after treatment with new antiseizure medications. METHODS We evaluated the time required postrandomization for each patient to experience the same number of seizures experienced during baseline (i.e., time-to-nth seizure), using a post hoc time-to-event (TTE) analysis of data from two Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive fenfluramine for DS (Study 1, N = 119; Study 2, N = 87). Patients aged 2-19 years were randomized to placebo or adjunctive fenfluramine (Study 1: .7 mg/kg/day or .2 mg/kg/day; Study 2: .4 mg/kg/day with stiripentol). Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier TTE curves and waterfall plots. RESULTS The proportion of patients who never reached baseline seizure frequency was greater with fenfluramine than with placebo (Study 1: fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day, 60%; fenfluramine .2 mg/kg/day, 31%; placebo, 13%; Study 2: fenfluramine .4 mg/kg/day, 58%; placebo, 2%). Median time-to-nth seizure was longer after fenfluramine than after placebo (Study 1: fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day, 13 weeks; .2 mg/kg/day, 10 weeks; placebo, 7 weeks; Study 2: fenfluramine .4 mg/kg/day, 13 weeks; placebo, 5 weeks; p

To evaluate whether fenfluramine (FFA) is associated with improvement in everyday executive function (EF)-self-regulation-in preschool-aged children with Dravet syndrome (DS).Children with DS received placebo or FFA in one of two phase III studies (first study: placebo, FFA 0.2 mg/kg/day, or FFA 0.7 mg/kg/day added to stiripentol-free standard-of-care regimens; second study: placebo or FFA 0.4 mg/kg/day added to stiripentol-inclusive regimens). Everyday EF was evaluated at baseline and Week 14-15 for children aged 2-4 years with parent ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function®-Preschool (BRIEF®-P); raw scores were transformed to T-scores and summarized in Inhibitory Self-Control Index (ISCI), Flexibility Index (FI), Emergent Metacognition Index (EMI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC). Clinically meaningful improvement and worsening were defined using RCI ≥ 90% and RCI ≥ 80% certainty, respectively. The associations between placebo vs FFA combined (0.2, 0.4, and 0.7 mg/kg/day) or individual treatment groups and the likelihood of clinically meaningful change in BRIEF®-P indexes/composite T-scores were evaluated using Somers'd; pairwise comparisons were calculated by 2-sided Fisher's Exact tests (p ≤ 0.05) and Cramér's V.Data were analyzed for 61 evaluable children of median age 3 years (placebo, n = 22; FFA 0.2 mg/kg/day, n = 15; 0.4 mg/kg/day [with stiripentol], n = 10; 0.7 mg/kg/day, n = 14 [total FFA, n = 39]). Elevated or problematic T-scores (T ≥ 65) were reported in 55% to 86% of patients at baseline for ISCI, EMI, and GEC, and in ∼33% for FI. Seventeen of the 61 children (28%) showed reliable, clinically meaningful improvement (RCI ≥ 90% certainty) in at least one BRIEF®-P index/composite, including a majority of the children in the FFA 0.7 mg/kg/day group (9/14, 64%). Only 53% of these children (9/17) also experienced clinically meaningful reduction (≥50%) in monthly convulsive seizure frequency, including 6/14 patients in the FFA 0.7 mg/kg/day group. Overall, there were positive associations between the four individual treatment groups and the likelihood of reliable, clinically meaningful improvement in all BRIEF®-P indexes/composite (ISCI, p = 0.001; FI, p = 0.005; EMI, p = 0.040; GEC, p = 0.002). The FFA 0.7 mg/kg/day group showed a greater likelihood of reliable, clinically meaningful improvement than placebo in ISCI (50% vs 5%; p = 0.003), FI (36% vs 0%; p = 0.005), and GEC (36% vs 0%; p = 0.005). For EMI, the FFA 0.7 mg/kg/day group showed a greater likelihood of reliable, clinically meaningful improvement than the FFA 0.2 mg/kg/day group (29% vs 0%; p = 0.040), but did not meet the significance threshold compared with placebo (29% vs 5%; p = 0.064). There were no significant associations between treatment and the likelihood of reliable, clinically meaningful worsening (p 0.05).In this preschool-aged DS population with high baseline everyday EF impairment, FFA treatment for 14-15 weeks was associated with dose-dependent, clinically meaningful improvements in regulating behavior, emotion, cognition, and overall everyday EF. These clinically meaningful improvements in everyday EF were not entirely due to seizure frequency reduction, suggesting that FFA may have direct effects on everyday EF during the early formative years of neurodevelopment.

Prior research has demonstrated durable and profound reductions in seizure frequency and improvements in executive functions in individuals with Dravet syndrome (DS) who are treated with fenfluramine (FFA). This study aimed to understand the benefits of FFA from the perspective of the patients' caregivers.Caregivers for a child with DS participated in semi-structured interviews to discuss the benefits of FFA treatment on the child with DS, the caregiver, and the family.65 caregivers participated. Patients were between 2 and 33 years old and had been treated with FFA for an average of 22.7 months. The most commonly reported seizure-related benefits (50 % of participants) of FFA treatment included a reduction in seizure activity, fewer seizure triggers, and shorter post-ictal recovery. The most common quality of life (QOL) benefits in patients included improvements in cognitive function, alertness, and academic performance. In addition, the caregivers reported improvements in their sleep quality (74 %) and that they felt less overwhelmed (72 %) and stressed (69 %) after their children began FFA treatment. Many caregivers also reported improved relationships between the child with DS and their siblings (52 %).The study found that FFA treatment is associated with meaningful improvement in a large number of QOL domains both for the people with DS who received FFA and their families.

IMPORTANCE: New treatment options are needed for patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a profoundly impairing, treatment-resistant, developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with LGS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 27, 2017, to October 25, 2019, and had a 20-week trial duration. Patients were enrolled at 65 study sites in North America, Europe, and Australia. Included patients were aged 2 to 35 years with confirmed diagnosis of LGS and experienced 2 or more drop seizures per week during the 4-week baseline. Using a modified intent-to-treat method, data analysis was performed from November 27, 2017, to October 25, 2019. The database lock date was January 30, 2020, and the date of final report was September 11, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either a 0.7-mg/kg/d or 0.2-mg/kg/d (maximum 26 mg/d) dose of fenfluramine or placebo. After titration (2-week period), patients were taking their randomized dose for 12 additional weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary efficacy end point was percentage change from baseline in drop seizure frequency in patients who received 0.7 mg/kg/d of fenfluramine vs placebo. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients (median [range] age, 13 [2-35] years; 146 male patients [56%]) were randomized to the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group (n = 87), 0.2-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group (n = 89), or placebo group (n = 87). The median percentage reduction in frequency of drop seizures was 26.5 percentage points in the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group, 14.2 percentage points in the 0.2-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group, and 7.6 percentage points in the placebo group. The trial met its primary efficacy end point: patients in the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group achieved a -19.9 percentage points (95% CI, -31.0 to -8.7 percentage points; P = .001) estimated median difference in drop seizures from baseline vs placebo. More patients in the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group achieved a 50% or greater response (22 of 87 [25%]; P = .02) vs placebo (9 of 87 [10%]). Site investigators and caregivers gave a much improved or very much improved rating on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale to more patients in the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group than patients in the placebo group (21 [26%] vs 5 [6%]; P = .001). The seizure subtype that appeared most responsive to fenfluramine was generalized tonic-clonic seizure (120 of 263 [46%]), with a decrease in frequency of 45.7% in the 0.7-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group and 58.2% in the 0.2-mg/kg/d fenfluramine group compared with an increase of 3.7% in the placebo group. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events included decreased appetite (59 [22%]), somnolence (33 [13%]), and fatigue (33 [13%]). No cases of valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this trial showed that, in patients with LGS, fenfluramine compared with placebo provided a significantly greater reduction in drop seizures and may be a particularly advantageous choice in patients who experience generalized tonic-clonic seizures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03355209. ispartof: JAMA NEUROLOGY vol:79 issue:6 pages:554-564 ispartof: location:United States status: published

To develop item response theory (IRT)-based item banks and short forms to measure stress and benefit related to caregiving for children, including children with epilepsy or other serious health conditions. Items developed with feedback from neurologists and caregivers of children with epilepsy were tested in cognitive interviews and administered to caregivers of children with severe epilepsy (N = 128), down syndrome (N = 143) and muscular dystrophy (N = 129), as well as a community sample of US caregivers (N = 322). IRT was used to analyze the data. Test–retest reliability was assessed using a two-way random effects (2,1) intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity was assessed by a pattern of correlations with relevant constructs (stress, depression, anxiety, and resilience) and by the pattern of scores by known groups. Caregivers of children with serious health conditions reported more stress and less benefit than the general sample. The final caregiver stress item bank (k = 19) and the caregiver benefit item bank (k = 13) were calibrated using IRT and centered on a sample of community caregivers representative of the US general caregiver population. Short form scores are highly correlated with full bank scores (r ≥ 0.98) and IRT reliability exceed 90% for most levels. Test–retest reliability was high (ICC > 0.92) for banks and short forms. Results provide strong support for reliability and validity of the caregiver stress and benefit scores. Instruments are publicly available, flexible, brief, and provide reliable and valid scores of caregiver stress and benefit of caregivers of children with and without serious health conditions.

Objective Phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-period crossover study assessing pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ZX008, a liquid oral formulation of fenfluramine (FFA) under development for adjunctive treatment of Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, administered with and without a combined antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen of stiripentol (STP), valproate (VPA), and clobazam (CLB) (STP regimen). Materials and methods 26 healthy adults were administered the following treatments: ZX008 0.8 mg/kg; STP 3,500 mg, CLB 20 mg, VPA 25 mg/kg (max. 1,500 mg); and ZX008 0.8 mg/kg + STP regimen. Dose periods were 17 days apart. Blood samples were obtained for 72 hours after drug administration and used to calculate non-compartmental PK parameters. Results Statistical bioequivalence-type analysis demonstrated ZX008 had no significant impact on the PK of any drug in the STP regimen, while the STP regimen moderately affected FFA PK. The 3-drug combination increased the geometric mean Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf of FFA while reducing the Cmax and AUC0-t of its major metabolite, norfenfluramine (norFFA). Adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate and resolved spontaneously. ZX008 + STP regimen co-administration to healthy adult subjects modestly impacted the number but not severity of AEs. Conclusion Results show that the STP regimen had a moderate impact on FFA and norFFA PK and ZX008 had no significant impact on the 3 STP regimen drugs. ZX008 would not be expected to alter the clinical response of patients to this regimen by means of an effect on PK. When administering these drugs together, a downward dose adjustment of ZX008 may be warranted. .

Individuals with Dravet syndrome (DS) experience frequent pharmacoresistant seizures beginning in infancy. Most exhibit poor neurodevelopmental outcomes including motor function difficulties, behavior problems, and cognitive impairment. Cognitive deficits in children with DS have been associated with seizure frequency and antiseizure medication (ASM) use. Recent research in children and young adults with DS has begun to examine the role of executive functions (EFs), as these include higher-order cognitive functions and may mediate the relationship between risk factors and cognitive impairment. Current conceptualizations, however, of EFs involve the broader self-regulation of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional domains. We explored relationships between reduction in convulsive seizure frequency and everyday EFs in a subset of children and young adults with DS treated with adjunctive fenfluramine for 1 year.This is a post-hoc analysis of data from children and young adults with Dravet syndrome aged 5-18 years who participated in a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (core study) followed by completion of at least 1 year of fenfluramine treatment in an open-label extension (OLE) study. Eligible children and young adults started the OLE study at 0.2 mg/kg/day fenfluramine and were titrated to optimal seizure control and tolerability (maximum daily dose: 26 mg/day). Parents/caregivers documented convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days (i.e., monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF]) by electronic diary. A parent/caregiver for each child also completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF®) parent form, a questionnaire capturing parents'/caregivers' perceptions of everyday EF that was included as a safety measure to assess treatment-related adverse effects on EF during the trial. Ratings on BRIEF® were mapped to the current edition, the BRIEF®2 parent form, and were used to calculate T-scores for the Behavior Regulation Index (BRI), Emotion Regulation Index (ERI), Cognitive Regulation Index (CRI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC). Change in BRIEF®2 T-scores from baseline in the core study to Year 1 of the OLE study was calculated. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients assessed associations between change in BRIEF®2 indexes/composite T-scores and percentage change in MCSF. Children and young adults were divided into 2 groups based on percentage of MCSF reduction achieved from pre-randomization baseline in the core study to Year 1 of the OLE study:50% and ≥50% MCSF reduction. Changes in the distribution of BRIEF®2 indexes/composite T-scores were compared between MCSF reduction groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. The proportions of children and young adults in these groups who showed clinically meaningful improvement in everyday EF, defined as Reliable Change Index (RCI) values ≥95% certainty relative to a reference population of neurotypically developing healthy volunteers, were then assessed by cross-tabulations and Somers' D tests (p ≤ 0.05). When there was a significant meaningful improvement in an index score, post-hoc analyses using the same statistical methods were conducted to evaluate the individual BRIEF®2 scales composing that index. Supplemental analyses examined the proportions of patients in MCSF reduction groups25% and ≥75% who achieved clinically meaningful improvement or worsening in everyday EF using RCI values ≥95% certainty and ≥80% certainty, respectively, relative to the reference population.At the time of analysis, 58 children and young adults (mean age: 11 ± 4 years) had reached OLE Year 1 of fenfluramine treatment with a 75% median percentage reduction in seizure frequency from pre-randomization baseline. Overall, there was a significant correlation between change in MCSF and change in BRIEF®2 T-scores for ERI (p = 0.008), but not for BRI, CRI, or GEC (p 0.05). At OLE Year 1, 78% (n = 45) of total children/young adults had ≥50% MCSF reduction (50% [n = 29] achieved ≥75% MCSF reduction) and 22% (n = 13) of total children/young adults had50% MCSF reduction (12% [n = 7] showed25% MCSF reduction). The ≥50% MCSF reduction group was significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful improvement (RCI ≥ 95% certainty) in ERI (p = 0.002) and in CRI (p = 0.001) than the50% MCSF reduction group. There were no significant differences in the proportions of children and young adults in the 2 MCSF reduction groups showing clinically meaningful worsening (RCI ≥ 80% certainty) on the BRIEF®2 indexes/composite.In children and young adults with DS, the magnitude of reduction in MCSF after long-term treatment with adjunctive fenfluramine was associated with clinically meaningful levels of improvement in everyday EF. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of children and young adults treated with adjunctive fenfluramine for 1 year in the OLE study achieved ≥50% reduction in MCSF, for a magnitude of efficacy associated with a significantly greater likelihood of experiencing clinically meaningful improvement in emotion regulation and cognitive regulation.

OBJECTIVE: Fenfluramine has been shown to provide clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency in children and adolescents (aged 2-18 years) with Dravet syndrome in two randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The objective of this analysis was to assess longer-term safety and efficacy of fenfluramine in patients who completed one of the double-blind studies and entered an open-label extension (OLE) study. METHODS: Patients enrolling in the OLE study initiated fenfluramine at 0.2 mg/kg/d regardless of their treatment assignment in the double-blind study. After 4 weeks, the fenfluramine dose could be titrated based on efficacy and tolerability to maximum of 0.7 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 27 mg/d) or maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 17 mg/d) in patients receiving concomitant stiripentol. The number and type of seizures were recorded daily in an electronic diary, and safety, including echocardiography, was assessed at Months 1, 2, and 3, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were enrolled as of March 13, 2018. During this analysis period, patients were treated for a median 256 days (range = 46-634 days). Over the entire OLE analysis period, the median decrease in convulsive seizure frequency compared to baseline in the double-blind studies was -66.8% (range = -100% to 234.9%; P

Objective Clinical trials typically report antiepileptic drug efficacy by evaluating reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) through group response (active versus placebo). Although useful for regulatory purposes, population statistics do not easily translate into clinical practice, where treatment decisions are made on an individual-patient basis. Responder analyses help bridge this gap by showing proportions of patients who achieved various MCSF improvement levels. Deriving numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to achieve clinically desirable response levels can further inform individual decision-making. We calculated the NNT with fenfluramine to achieve “clinically meaningful” (≥50%) or “profound” (≥75%) MCSF reductions in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS). Methods NNT to achieve ≥50% or ≥75% MCSF reduction was assessed using longitudinal data from two phase 3 studies for adjunctive fenfluramine in DS patients aged 2–18 years. NNT was calculated: 1/((Experimental-Responder Rate)−(Control-Responder Rate)). Results In Study 1, NNTs to achieve ≥50% and ≥75% MCSF reduction were 1.8 and 2.1 at 0.7 mg/kg/day fenfluramine. In Study 2, these NNTs were 2.0 and 3.1, respectively. These results were seen as early as Weeks 6–7 and were sustained through Weeks 14–15. Interpretation For every two to three patients with DS treated with fenfluramine in these trials, one patient achieved ≥50% or ≥75% MCSF reduction, respectively, compared with placebo (large treatment effect size; Cohen’s d≈0.8). Responder analyses and NNTs can aid in clinical decision-making by offering clinically important information that is complementary to the population mean data on the chance of an individual patient achieving meaningful levels of MCSF improvement. (NCT02682927/NCT02826863, NCT02926898)

Purpose Fenfluramine is being developed as a low-dose adjunctive treatment for seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome and other epileptic encephalopathies, including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Most patients with Dravet syndrome receive multiple antiepileptic drugs, making it challenging for caregivers to track correct administration times. The present Phase I study was conducted to determine the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic properties of fenfluramine. Methods Healthy nonsmoking subjects aged 18 to 50 years were enrolled in an open-label, crossover, Phase I pharmacokinetic and safety profile study and received 2 single 0.8-mg/kg doses of ZX008 (fenfluramine hydrochloride oral solution), 1 after a 10-hour overnight fast and the other 30 minutes after the start of consumption of a high-fat breakfast, in a randomly assigned order. A washout period of at least 9 days separated the 2 treatment periods. Venous blood samples were taken before each dose and periodically for 72 hours after each dose for determination of concentrations of fenfluramine and its active metabolite norfenfluramine. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for each subject by noncompartmental analysis. Findings In the 13 subjects completing both treatment periods, food had no effect on the rate or extent of absorption and bioavailability of fenfluramine as assessed by fed vs fasted adjusted geometric mean observed plasma Cmax (59.1 vs 56.7 ng/mL; NS) and AUC0–∞ (1640 vs 1600 ng · h/mL; NS). Additionally, there was no impact of food on systemic exposure of norfenfluramine. Seven subjects reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; all treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity. Implications The bioequivalence and tolerability of single 0.8-mg/kg oral doses of ZX008 in the fed and fasted states support ZX008 administration without regard to meals.

The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the impact of caring for a child with Dravet syndrome (DS) on caregivers.We surveyed DS caregivers at a single institution with a large population of patient with DS. Survey domains included time spent/difficulty performing caregiving tasks (Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale, OCBS); caregiver health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5D-5L, EQ-5D); and work/activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, WPAI). Modified National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) questions were included to assess logistical challenges associated with coordinating medical care.Thirty-four primary caregivers responded, and 30/34 respondents completed the survey. From OCBS, providing transportation, personal care, and additional household tasks required the greatest caregiver time commitment; arranging for child care, communication, and managing behavioral problems presented the greatest difficulty. EuroQoL 5D-5L domains with the greatest impact on caregivers (0=none, 5=unable/extreme) were anxiety/depression (70% of respondents≥slight problems, 34%≥moderate) and discomfort/pain (57% of respondents≥slight problems, 23%≥moderate). The mean EQ-5D general health visual analogue scale (VAS) score (0=death; 100=perfect health) was 67 (range, 11-94). Respondents who scored65 were two- to fourfold more likely to report ≥moderate time spent and difficulty managing child behavior problems and assisting with walking, suggesting that children with DS with high degrees of motor or neurodevelopmental problems have an especially high impact on caregiver health. On the WPAI, 26% of caregivers missed1day of work in the previous week, with 43% reporting substantial impact (≥6, scale=1-10) on work productivity; 65% reported switching jobs, quitting jobs, or losing a job due to caregiving responsibilities. National Health Interview Survey responses indicated logistical burdens beyond the home; 50% of caregivers made ≥10 outpatient visits in the past year with their child with DS.Caring for patients with DS exerts physical, emotional, and time burdens on caregivers. Supportive services for DS families are identified to highlight an unmet need for DS treatments.

Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the annual direct and indirect costs associated with Dravet Syndrome (DS). Methods A survey was electronically administered to the caregivers of patients with DS treated at Children's Hospital Colorado. Survey domains included healthcare utilization of the patient with DS and DS caregiver work productivity and activity impairment. Patient healthcare utilization was measured using modified questions from the National Health Interview Survey; caregiver work productivity and activity impairment were measured using modified questions from the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Direct costs were calculated by multiplying the caregiver-reported healthcare utilization rates by the mean unit cost for each healthcare utilization category. Indirect costs included lost productivity, income loss, and lost leisure time. The indirect costs were a function of caregiver-reported hours spent caregiving and an hourly unit cost. Results The survey was emailed to 60 DS caregivers, of which 34 (57% response rate) responded. Direct costs on average were $27,276 (95% interval: $15,757, $41,904) per patient with DS. Hospitalizations ($11,565 a year) and in-home medical care visits ($9894 a year) were substantial cost drivers. Additionally, caregivers reported extensive time spent providing care to an individual with DS. This caregiver time resulted in average annual indirect costs of $81,582 (95% interval: $57,253, $110,151), resulting in an average total annual financial burden of $106,378 (95% interval: $78,894, $137,906). Conclusion Dravet Syndrome results in substantial healthcare utilization, financial burden, and time commitment. Establishing evidence on the financial burden of DS is essential to understanding the overall impact of DS, identifying potential areas for support needs, and assessing the impact of novel treatments as they become available. Based on the study findings, in-home visits, hospitalizations, and lost productivity and leisure time of caregivers are key domains for DS economic evaluations. Future research should extend these estimates to include the potential additional healthcare utilization of the DS caregiver.

Objective Caring for children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) places substantial demands on the entire family unit, including siblings. The Sibling Voices Survey assesses parental and sibling responses to questions designed to assess how children adapt to growing up with siblings with DEE. Methods Participants responded to 1 of 4 online, age- and role-specific surveys (9–12, 13–17, and ≥ 18-year-old [adult] siblings; parents responded with perceptions of their unaffected child's/children's feelings). Survey questions used visual analog scales, categorical responses, and free-form responses. Results Survey submissions (n = 248) included 128 parents and 120 siblings (9- to 12-year-olds, n = 24; 13- to 17-year-olds, n = 17; adults, n = 79). All groups identified home life as the most substantially affected area of their lives (71%–84%), compared with interactions at school (21%–32%) or with friends (28%–42%). The most difficult aspect across all sibling groups was “feeling worried/scared when their sibling has seizures” (58%–70%). Feeling “overly responsible” for the sibling was reported by most adult siblings (63%), 41% of 13- to 17-year-old siblings, and 34% of parents. Siblings reported more symptoms of depressed mood (e.g., “down/unhappy,” 47%–62%) than their parents perceived them feeling (25%). Most sibling groups (29%–49%) reported more symptoms of anxious mood (e.g., “nightmares/bad dreams”) than parents perceived (15%). Identification of potential helpful coping mechanisms varied by age group. Most respondents (68%–76%) reported positive aspects, including greater maturity and compassion. Significance The Sibling Voices Survey provided important insights into how DEE impacts siblings psychologically and socially. This study highlights the need for increased awareness among parents and healthcare providers to monitor siblings for potential signs of depressed or anxious mood, to provide proper support, and to decrease potential for negative long-term consequences.

OBJECTIVE: Adjunctive fenfluramine hydrochloride, classically described as acting pharmacologically through a serotonergic mechanism, has demonstrated a unique and robust clinical response profile with regard to its magnitude, consistency, and durability of effect on seizure activity in patients with pharmacoresistant Dravet syndrome. Recent findings also support long-term improvements in executive functions (behavior, emotion, cognition) in these patients. The observed clinical profile is inconsistent with serotonergic activity alone, as other serotonergic medications have not been demonstrated to have these clinical effects. This study investigated a potential role for σ1 receptor activity in complementing fenfluramine's serotonergic pharmacology. METHODS: Radioligand binding assays tested the affinity of fenfluramine for 47 receptors associated with seizures in the literature, including σ receptors. Cellular function assays tested fenfluramine and norfenfluramine (its major metabolite) activity at various receptors, including adrenergic, muscarinic, and serotonergic receptors. The σ1 receptor activity was assessed by the mouse vas deferens isometric twitch and by an assay of dissociation of the σ1 receptor from the endoplasmic reticulum stress protein binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP). In vivo mouse models assessed fenfluramine activity at σ1 receptors in ameliorating dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in spatial and nonspatial memory tasks, alone or in combination with the reference σ1 receptor agonist PRE-084. RESULTS: Fenfluramine and norfenfluramine bound ≥30% to β2-adrenergic, muscarinic M1, serotonergic 5-HT1A, and σ receptors, as well as sodium channels, with a Ki between 266 nM (σ receptors) and 17.5 μM (β-adrenergic receptors). However, only σ1 receptor isometric twitch assays showed a positive functional response, with weak stimulation by fenfluramine and inhibition by norfenfluramine. Fenfluramine, but not the 5-HT2C agonist lorcaserin, showed a positive modulation of the PRE-084-induced dissociation of σ1 protein from BiP. Fenfluramine also showed dose-dependent antiamnesic effects against dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in spontaneous alternation and passive avoidance responses, which are models of σ1 activation. Moreover, low doses of fenfluramine synergistically potentiated the low-dose effect of PRE-084, confirming a positive modulatory effect at the σ1 receptor. Finally, all in vivo effects were blocked by the σ1 receptor antagonist NE-100. SIGNIFICANCE: Fenfluramine demonstrated modulatory activity at σ1 receptors in vitro and in vivo in addition to its known serotonergic activity. These studies identify a possible new σ1 receptor mechanism underpinning fenfluramine's central nervous system effects, which may contribute to its antiseizure activity in Dravet syndrome and positive effects observed on executive functions in clinical studies. ispartof: EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR vol:105 ispartof: location:United States status: published

OBJECTIVE: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a drug-resistant, childhood onset electroclinical epilepsy syndrome with multiple seizure types and diagnostic electroencephalogram findings. ZX008 (fenfluramine HCl oral solution) was well tolerated and reduced seizure frequency in Dravet syndrome, prompting this phase 2, open-label, dose-finding study of add-on ZX008 in patients with LGS (NCT02655198). METHODS: Eligible treatment-refractory patients with LGS aged 3-18 years with ≥4 documented convulsive seizures (CS) in the prior 4 weeks were administered adjunctive ZX008 twice daily at an initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d, with incremental dose escalations up to 0.8 mg/kg/d or 30 mg/d (maximum dose) every 4 weeks in nonresponders (

Objective: Although pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) commonly affects activity engagement, the daily pain experience has not been fully characterized. Specifically, the nature and impact of pain flares is not well understood. This study characterized pain flares as defined by participants with knee OA. Pain flare occurrence and experience were measured over 7 days. Methods: This was a multiple methods study; qualitative methods were dominant. Data were collected during the baseline portion of a randomized controlled trial. Participants met criteria for knee OA and had moderate to severe pain. They completed questionnaires and a 7-day home monitoring period that captured momentary symptom reports simultaneously with physical activity via accelerometry (n = 45). Participants also provided individual definitions of pain flare that were used throughout the home monitoring period to indicate whether a pain flare occurred. Results: Pain flares were described most often by quality (often sharp), followed by timing (seconds, minutes) and by antecedents and consequences. When asked if their definition of a flare agreed with a supplied definition, 49% of the sample reported only "somewhat," "a little," or "not at all." Using individual definitions, 78% experienced at least 1 daily pain flare over the home monitoring period; 24% had a flare on more than 50% of the monitored days. Conclusion: Pain flares were common, fleeting, and often experienced in the context of activity engagement. Participants' views on what constitutes a pain flare differ from commonly accepted definitions. Pain flares are an understudied aspect of the knee OA pain experience and require further characterization.

Objectives No existing pain treatment is effective for all pain problems, and response to pain treatment is highly variable. Knowledge regarding the patient factors that predict response to different treatments could benefit patients by providing an empirical foundation for patient-treatment matching. This study sought to test the hypothesis that improvements following two treatments thought to operate via similar mechanisms would be predicted by similar baseline pain qualities. Design Prospective prediction analysis using data from a previously published open label trial comparing a heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus subacromial corticosteroid injection for the treatment of pain in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome. Results Consistent with the study hypothesis, the response to the two treatments were predicted by similar baseline pain qualities; specifically, higher baseline levels of unpleasant, electric, and sensitive pain predicted subsequent improvements in sleep interference, work/activity interference, and patient global ratings of improvement, respectively. Conclusions The findings are consistent with the combined ideas that (1) those who have the most to gain (i.e., those reporting the highest levels of various pain qualities) can expect the best response to effective treatments and (2) different pain qualities may be associated with different types of outcomes. The findings support further research to examine how pain quality measures may be used to improve patient-treatment matching, and therefore, ultimately improve the efficiency, efficacy, and overall benefit-risk of pain treatment.

Objectives To describe the effects of 2 pain treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), and illustrate how investigators can use pain quality information to understand treatment response differences. Materials and methods This study presents pain quality data from a randomized open-label study comparing the effects of an injection of triamcinolone and up to twice daily application of a heated lidocaine/tetracaine (Trilexis) patch in individuals with SIS. Study participants completed a measure of pain quality at baseline and again on study days 14, 28, and 42 following initiation of 2 treatments for SIS. Baseline and posttreatment pain quality scores were graphed to provide a visual representation of treatment-associated changes. Analyses of variance were used to examine the differences between treatment conditions in changes in pain quality with treatment. Results Both treatments resulted in substantial (and similar) pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in many pain qualities. However, differences in the time course of treatment effects were observed for itchy and heavy qualities. Discussion Although 2 different pain treatments appear to have the same effects when only pretreatment to posttreatment changes are examined, treatment differences emerged when the time course of treatment is examined. The findings support the importance of assessing both pain qualities and time course of treatment as outcome domains. The results illustrate how investigators can use data from clinical trials to provide a more fine-tuned description of treatment effects, providing knowledge that could be helpful in selecting treatment options at the individual patient level. Summary Examination of the effects of pain treatments on pain qualities over time will help researchers and clinicians understand if certain pain quality domains respond faster to one treatment versus another, and may identify differences between treatments that would not be observed by measures of global pain intensity alone.

There are no standardized bedside assessments for subtyping patients with osteoarthritis (OA) based on pain mechanisms. Thus, we developed a bedside sensory testing kit (BSTK) to classify OA patients based on sensory profiles potentially indicative of pain mechanism. After usability and informal reliability testing (n = 22), the kit was tested in a formal reliability study (n = 20). Patients completed questionnaires and sensory testing: pressure algometry to detect hyperalgesia; repeat algometry after heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation to measure diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC); light touch using Von Frey filaments; and cold allodynia using a brass rod. The procedure was brief and well tolerated. Algometry and filament testing were highly reliable [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) 0.71-0.91]; DNIC was acceptably reliable (ICCs 0.53-0.91); brass rod reliability was inconclusive. Patients were classified empirically into four groups: "All abnormal findings" (primary and secondary hyperalgesia and dysfunctional DNIC); "all normal findings"; and two intermediate groups. The "all abnormal findings" group had more neuropathic pain symptoms, and lower WOMAC total, stiffness, and activity scores than the "all normal findings" group. Simple BSTK procedures, consolidated in a kit, reliably classified OA patients into subgroups based on sensory profile, suggesting that OA patients differ in underlying pain mechanisms. Further research is needed to confirm these subgroups and determine their validity in predicting response to treatment.

Richard Radnovich,1 Jeremiah Trudeau,2 Arnold R Gammaitoni3 1Injury Care Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA; 2Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA; 3Nuvo Research Inc., West Chester, PA, USA Background: Treatment for pain due to shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) typically begins conservatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy and can include subacromial injection of corticosteroids, particularly in patients unresponsive to conservative measures. The heated lidocaine/tetracaine (HLT) patch has been reported to reduce SIS pain in a small case series. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial in which adult patients with SIS pain lasting at least 14 days, with an average intensity of ≥4 on a 0–10 scale (0= no pain, 10= worst pain) were randomized to treatment with the HLT patch or a single subacromial injection of triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg). Patients in the HLT patch group applied a single HLT patch to the shoulder for 4 hours twice daily, with a 12-hour interval between treatments during the first 14 days, and could continue to use the patch on an as-needed basis (up to twice daily) during the second 14-day period. No treatment was allowed in the final 14-day period. At baseline and at days 14, 28, and 42, patients rated their pain and pain interference with specific activities (0–10 scale). Results: Sixty patients enrolled in the study (average age =51 years, range 18–75, n=21 female). Average pain scores declined from 6.0±1.6 at baseline to 3.5±2.4 at day 42 in the HLT patch group (n=29, P

We reviewed the current literature with respect to the humanistic and financial burdens of Dravet Syndrome (DS) on the caregivers of children with DS, in order to (1) identify key unanswered questions or gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed and then, based on these knowledge gaps, (2) propose a research agenda for the scientific community to address in the coming decade. The findings support the conclusion that caring for a child with DS is associated with significant humanistic burden and direct costs. However, due in part to the paucity of studies, as well as the lack of measures of specific burden domains, there remains much that is not known regarding the burden of caregiving for children with DS. To address the significant knowledge gaps in this area, research is needed that will: (1) identify the specific domains of caregivers' lives that are impacted by caring for a child with DS; (2) identify or, if needed, develop measures of caregiving impact in this area; (3) identify the factors that influence DS caregiving burden; (4) develop and evaluate the efficacy of treatments for reducing the negative impact of DS and its comorbidities on DS caregivers; (5) quantify the direct medical costs associated with DS and DS comorbidities and identify the factors that influence these costs; and (6) quantify and fully explore the indirect costs of DS. Research that addresses these goals will provide the empirical foundation needed for improving the quality of life of children with DS and their families.

Severe epilepsy in children and young adults can significantly affect the lives of their caregivers. However, the lack of a reliable and valid measure of caregiver impact has limited our understanding of the scope and correlates of this impact, as well as our ability to measure the effects of treatments that could lessen it. The purpose of this study was to facilitate focus groups and interviews with an international group of clinician experts and caregivers to identify the most important domains that should be assessed in a measure of caregiver impact. Ten specific subdomains emerged from the panel discussions, which could be classified into the four overarching categories of physical health, mental health, social function, and financial resources. The caregivers highlighted the impact on the subdomains of sleep and fatigue as most critical. A review of existing caregiver impact measures confirmed that there is no measure currently available that assesses all of these relevant domains, indicating the need for the development of such a measure. The current findings highlight the significant life effects of caring for a child with severe epilepsy and can be used to inform the development of such a tool.

Objective. The aim of this study is to assess the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) in predicting pregabalin in peripheral neuropathic pain (NP). Study Design. Post hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal trial evaluating pregabalin in 99 patients with NP who completed the PQAS, which comprises 20 questions regarding individual pain domains and qualities that are scored into three scales: paroxysmal, deep, and surface. Methods. Patients rated the average pain intensity and pain quality using the PQAS at baseline; average pain intensity was assessed again after 40 days of treatment with pregabalin. Associations between pretreatment PQAS scores and treatment response were estimated using Pearson's r. Logistic regression was used to identify pretitration PQAS scores contributing unique variance to predicting treatment response. Results. Fifty participants provided baseline PQAS scores and received pregabalin for the entire length of the study. Nine of 23 PQAS baseline scales and items were significantly associated with treatment response to pregabalin: the paroxysmal and deep scales, and the items assessing the following pain domains and qualities: intensity, electric, tingling, cramping, radiating, throbbing, and deep (P values range, 0.002–0.045; rs range, 0.28–0.43). The PQAS items assessing sharp, hot, and unpleasant pain items demonstrated nonsignificant trends (P

To identify and describe the response profile of pregabalin on the qualities of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy.A post hoc analysis to examine the effects of pregabalin on pain quality in patients with moderate-to-severe peripheral neuropathic pain was performed using data from an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal proof-of-concept study. Patients rated the quality of their pain experience using the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) at baseline, after a 12-day titration period, after a 9-day maintenance period, and after a 19-day randomized withdrawal period. Pretitration to posttitration and prewithdrawal to postwithdrawal changes in PQAS paroxysmal, surface, and deep pain scale scores were examined.PQAS data were available for 99 of the 104 participants who entered all phases of the study. There were significant (P0.006, Bonferroni adjusted for multiple tests) improvements pretitration to posttitration in all 3 PQAS subscales, with a greater effect on paroxysmal and deep pain than on surface pain. During the withdrawal phase, pregabalin was significantly (P0.006) more effective than placebo for improvements in paroxysmal and surface pain only, although the pregabalin group continued to show numerical improvement in deep pain relative to placebo.Pregabalin had a greater effect on PQAS-assessed paroxysmal pain than on surface or deep pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy. The findings corroborate previous research demonstrating differential effects of analgesic drugs across pain qualities, further emphasizing the need to assess individual pain qualities in addition to overall pain intensity.

Traditionally, sample size considerations for phase 2 trials are based on the desired properties of the design and response information from the trials. In this article, we propose to design phase 2 trials based on program-level optimization. We present a framework to evaluate the impact that several phase 2 design features have on the probability of phase 3 success and the expected net present value of the product. These factors include the phase 2 sample size, decision rules to select a dose for phase 3 trials, and the sample size for phase 3 trials. Using neuropathic pain as an example, we use simulations to illustrate the framework and show the benefit of including these factors in the overall decision process.

A composite responder index for chronic low-back pain (CLBP) has recently been proposed to evaluate the efficacy of CLBP treatments in clinical trials. We compared the responsiveness of this composite measure with a number of single-item responder definitions.We pooled data from 2 placebo-controlled studies of etoricoxib in CLBP to evaluate 5 response criteria: 30% pain intensity (PI) reduction; 50% PI reduction; 20 mm absolute reduction (100 mm PI visual analog scale); patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART); and the composite criteria of 30% reduction in PI+30% improvement in PGART of disease status+no worsening in function. We used bootstrap analysis and logistic regression to assess the ability to differentiate etoricoxib and placebo, and the κ coefficient to assess agreement among the responder criteria.The criterion of a 20 mm improvement in PI resulted in the greatest proportion (71.5%) of patients being classified as responders and all criteria separated etoricoxib from placebo (P≤0.0001). PGART had the highest discriminant ability (odds ratio 5.90), and was significantly (P0.05) more discriminant than the 20 mm and ≥30% improvements and the composite criteria. After adjusting for all other measures, only PGART continued to show a significant treatment effect for etoricoxib versus placebo (P=0.0003). Kappa values contrasting the composite criteria and the single-item measures ranged from 0.59 to 0.85.These findings do not support the superiority of a composite index over single-item ratings of PI and PGART ratings, but do suggest that PGART ratings may be more responsive to treatment, perhaps because they measure something in addition to change in PI.

SUMMARY Introduction: The increased thrombotic cardiovascular (CV) risk in trials of cyclo- oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors versus placebo, and the apparent similar risk with nons- teroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may be related to their potential to elevate blood pressure (BP). Aims: We evaluated the relationship between baseline BP and change in BP on CV events (CVEs) in patients receiving NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors in the prospec- tive randomized, double-blind, Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term Program (N = 34,701) comparing etoricoxib 60 or 90 mg or diclofenac 150 mg daily for a mean duration of 18 months. The main outcome measure was confirmed thrombotic CVEs. The Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration endpoint, all-cause mortality, CV/congestive heart failure (CHF) mortality, and CHF incidence were similarly evaluated. Results: We found that baseline systolic BP (SBP) was associated with significantly higher risk of all events (P < 0.001). Baseline diastolic BP (DBP) was inversely and significantly associated with risk of all events (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016) except CV/CHF mortality (P = 0.054). There was no significant differential effect between etoricoxib and diclofenac in relation to CVEs, except for confirmed CHF, for which the risk was significantly higher with etoricoxib (P = 0.019). Only CHF risk (P = 0.020 for both SBP and DBP change), but not thrombotic endpoints, was significantly associated with change in BP from months 0 to 4. These findings were not meaningfully altered after covariate adjustment for baseline CV risk. Conclusions: Baseline BP, but not change in BP, was significantly associated with risk of thrombotic CVEs through 18 months. The CV risk of COX-2s and NSAIDs did not appear to be related to the BP- elevating effects of these agents, although such analyses, i.e., from randomized controlled trials, are unable to definitively exclude such a relationship.

Global ratings of treatment satisfaction and improvement can provide an opportunity for patients to aggregate multiple aspects of their treatment into a single measure of its perceived benefits and disadvantages. Although such measures have been recommended for chronic pain clinical trials, only limited data are available that address the hypothesis that they reflect multiple aspects of patients’ treatment experience. Our objective was to identify the factors that make independent contributions to ratings of treatment satisfaction. We analyzed data from 5 open-label clinical trials of lidocaine patch 5% in osteoarthritis knee pain and chronic low back pain that were 2 to 12 weeks in duration. A total of 383 patients completed the Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction scale and measures of pain, interference with physical and emotional functioning, sleep interference, and adverse events. The results of multivariate analyses indicated that improvements in measures of pain intensity, pain relief, and interference with physical functioning each made independent contributions to treatment satisfaction in both groups of patients. Improvements in interference with emotional functioning and sleep and the presence and severity of adverse events were not associated with satisfaction. Perspective Measures of treatment satisfaction can reflect different aspects of the patient’s treatment response, including improvements in pain and physical functioning. Increased understanding of such global measures may facilitate development of clinical trial outcomes that allow patients to evaluate with minimal burden those aspects of the treatment experience they consider personally meaningful.

Objective. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) responses in osteoarthritis (OA) are highly variable, often requiring multiple medication changes. We sought to determine pre-randomization predictors of response to NSAIDs in OA. Methods. Data were pooled from two identical 26-week double-blind, randomized flare design trials comparing etoricoxib 30 mg/day (N = 475), celecoxib 200 mg/day (N = 488), and placebo (N = 244) in patients with OA of the hip or knee. This analysis was limited to the 12-week placebo-controlled period. Response at Week 12 was defined using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT–OARSI) criteria. Factors were analyzed using logistic regression and included age, race, gender, body mass index, index joint, screening (pre-washout) and baseline (post-washout) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index pain, physical function, and stiffness, and patient global assessment of disease status, prior NSAID/coxib or acetaminophen use, American Rheumatology Association functional class, and disease duration. Results. We found that screening WOMAC physical function was the only factor that predicted response in all treatment groups; worse function was associated with lower odds of achieving an OMERACT–OARSI response at 12 weeks (odds ratio 0.84 placebo; 0.87 etoricoxib; 0.89 celecoxib; P < 0.05 for all). However, the differences in WOMAC physical function between responders and nonresponders were small (∼5 mm on a 100-mm scale). No factor discriminated between the ability to predict placebo response from active treatment response. Conclusions. Lower levels of physical function decreased the odds of a response to NSAID treatment in OA, although the clinical significance is unknown given the small differences between responders and nonresponders. No other measured baseline variables consistently predicted response in these studies, which may reflect the known individual variability in NSAID response.

Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) are useful for presenting treatment response, conveying the clinical relevance of results. NNTs are typically calculated at a landmark endpoint (end of trial), but often using the last observation carried forward (LOCF), which ignores patient discontinuations. We compared NNTs in chronic low back pain (CLBP) using three separate imputation methods, using data from two identical 12-week trials comparing etoricoxib 60 mg (N = 210), 90 mg (N = 212), and placebo (N = 217). We calculated the number of patients with improvements in pain intensity from baseline of ⩾15%, ⩾30%, ⩾50%, and ⩾70% at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. For longitudinal response over time, patient discontinuations were assigned a 0% improvement from dropout forward. Landmark response at week 12 was assessed using LOCF and completer approaches, using only observed (non-missing) data. The longitudinal approach was most conservative; after 12 weeks 65% of patients taking etoricoxib had ⩾15% improvement, 60% had ⩾30% improvement, 45% had ⩾50%, improvement, and 30% had ⩾70% improvement, with placebo rates approximately 55%, 45%, 30%, and 15%, respectively. Response rates were higher with landmark analyses. Landmark NNTs at week 12 were generally similar or slightly lower (better) than those from a longitudinal approach, but results were inconsistent. Landmark analyses provide no information on response variability, as is obtained with longitudinal analysis. Outcome, imputation method, and reporting method are intimately connected and need to be considered alongside trial quality and validity to make sensible comparisons between treatments.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) with suboptimal response to existing pain regimens. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study. OA patients (n = 500) taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics who had inadequate response as determined by their physicians (≥ 40 mm on a 0–100 mm pain scale) were switched directly to etoricoxib 60 mg once daily for 4 weeks without prior medication washout. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with ≥ 30% improvement in Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain walking on a flat surface after 4 weeks of treatment. Other endpoints included WOMAC Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function subscales, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), investigator’s global assessment of response to therapy (IGART), the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and Short Form 36 (SF36). Safety and tolerability were assessed by collecting adverse events. Results: After switching to etoricoxib, 52% (95% confidence interval: 47%, 57%) of patients reported a clinically meaningful reduction (≥ 30%) for WOMAC pain walking on a flat surface. Disability in daily activities and pain interference were significantly improved (P

Item Response Theory (IRT) is being increasingly used to develop and evaluate outcome measures. However, many pain measures, including those that assess pain quality, have yet to be evaluated from the IRT perspective. The current study evaluated the scales of a commonly used measure of pain quality (the Pain Quality Assessment Scale, or PQAS) using IRT analyses in 3 samples of patients with chronic pain. The findings indicated variability in the precision of the scales, suggesting that all 3 of the PQAS scales are precise when pain is severe and that the Paroxysmal and Deep scales but not necessarily the Surface scale are precise when pain is of moderate or lower severity. In addition, 2 potential problems with the 11 (ie, 0 to 10) response levels used for the PQAS items were identified: (1) a high degree of overlap between adjacent response levels and (2) a lack of interval scaling. Research is needed to determine the extent to which these problems do, or do not, threaten the validity of the PQAS items and scales as outcome measures in pain clinical trials. Perspective IRT analyses provide important information about the psychometric and practical qualities of pain measures that is not provided by standard (classical test theory) analyses. IRT analyses of the PQAS subscales indicate that some of the scales are more precise than others at different levels of pain severity and provide important directions for further research to better understand the PQAS. IRT analyses would probably similarly provide important information concerning the utility of other measures commonly used in pain research.

Objective: To provide a better empirical understanding of the dimensionality of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain quality. Method: An exploratory factor analysis (FA) was performed with baseline pain quality data [assessed using the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)] from patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (n = 368) and low back pain (n = 455) who had participated in a series of analgesic clinical trials. The results of the FA were then confirmed in a sample of patients with neuropathic pain secondary to carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 138). Comparisons between the diagnostic groups on scale scores derived from the FA results were also made using t tests. Results: Three clear pain quality factors emerged that seemed to represent (1) paroxysmal pain sensations (PQAS descriptors: shooting, sharp, electric, hot, and radiating), (2) superficial pain (itchy, cold, numb, sensitive, and tingling), and (3) deep pain (aching, heavy, dull, cramping, and throbbing). The PQAS tender pain item did not load strongly on any of the 3 factors. Discussion: The findings support the hypothesis that pain qualities cluster into distinct groups. If replicated in additional samples, the pain quality domains identified may provide clinicians and researchers with a useful way to summarize data from pain quality measures, and may also provide meaningful end points that would allow for treatment differentiation between various pharmacologic entities.

Objective. Many patients with moderate to severe chronic nonmalignant pain require dosing of long-acting opioids more frequently than recommended by the product’s manufacturer. To accurately quantitate opioid dosing in clinical practice, daily dosing was prospectively assessed in pain clinic patients. Design. A single-center, 30-day, prospective, observational cohort study, approved by the hospital IRB. Patients. Forty-one evaluable adult outpatients receiving treatment with long-acting opioids for moderate to severe chronic nonmalignant pain. Outcome Measures. The primary measure was the daily number of consumed doses of prescribed long-acting opioid. Rescue medication use, average daily pain intensity, and patient-reported adverse events were also recorded. Results. The mean daily number of doses was 3.0 for oxycodone controlled release (CR), 2.9 for morphine CR, and 3.7 for methadone. For transdermal fentanyl, 50% of patients required dosing every 24–48 hours. Ninety-one percent of oxycodone CR-treated patients, 86% of morphine CR-treated patients, and 50% of fentanyl patch-treated patients required dosing more frequently than that recommended by the product’s manufacturer. Patients who received oxycodone CR, morphine CR, and transdermal fentanyl required a mean of 2.9, 2.9, and 3.7 rescue doses per day, respectively. Conclusions. Many patients taking common long-acting opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain require dosing more frequently than recommended by product labeling, and take an additional 3–4 daily doses of rescue opioid, yet they continue to report moderate to severe pain. Newer opioid formulations that can provide sustained analgesia with convenient dosing are needed as well as a better understanding of the many additional factors that may influence opioid use patterns in patients with chronic pain.

Objective: Evaluate levels of pain relief achieved in patients with chronic pain treated with hydrocodone-extended release (HC-ER) up to 48 weeks and show that these levels were associated with secondary functional and global outcomes. Design: Post hoc analyses were based on a previously reported study that started with an open-label conversion/titration phase for ≤ 6 weeks followed by an open-label 48-week treatment phase. Setting: Private practice and institutional pain centers. Participants: Three hundred ninety-one opioid-experienced subjects with moderate to severe pain for ≥ 3 months. Interventions: Individualized doses (20-300 mg) of extended-release hydrocodone every 12 hours. Main outcome: Almost 60 percent (232/391) of subjects achieved moderate or substantial levels of pain relief ( ≥ 30 percent reduction in pain score) during the study. Results: Subjects who achieved moderate or substantial pain relief demonstrated significant (p < 0.001) improvements in Oswestry Disability Inventory (ODI), all pain interference outcomes, and Subject Global Assessment of Medication. Subjects with substantial pain relief had decreases in ODI, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety, and HADS depression scores of − 13.4 ± 14.92, − 1.9 ± 3.37, and − 1.7 ± 3.26, respectively. The five most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were constipation (12.5 percent), back pain (11.1 percent), nausea (9.9 percent), vomiting (9.7 percent), and arthralgia (7.8 percent) and are consistent with opioid therapy. Conclusions: Moderate or substantial levels of pain relief were associated with the greatest functional improvements in patients treated with HC-ER. These results may help define success of opioid therapy and determine if it should be continued or an alternative treatment should be tried.

Objective To evaluate the durability of pain relief provided by a new formulation of single-entity, hydrocodone extended-release (ER) (Zohydro® ER) throughout the 12-hour dosing interval by examining patterns of rescue medication use. Design Phase 3, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal study with an open-label, conversion/titration phase (≤6 weeks) followed by a placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment phase (12 weeks). Setting Fifty-seven study sites in the United States enrolled patients. Subjects One hundred and fifty-one opioid-experienced subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain who were treated with hydrocodone ER once every 12 hours. Methods Post hoc analysis of rescue medication use by frequency and distribution of use following the morning and evening dose of hydrocodone ER. Results No rescue medication was used following the morning or evening dose of hydrocodone ER during 36.0% and 76.7% of the dosing days, respectively. Time distribution of rescue medication use showed that 79.3% of all rescue medication doses were administered following the morning dose, with the highest rate of usage (46.2%) occurring 4–8 hours postdose, followed by 18.7% and 14.4% usage 0–4 and 8–12 hours postdose, respectively. Examination of the three 4-hour intervals following the evening dose of hydrocodone ER revealed similar minimal rescue medication use (5.6–8.2%). Conclusions End-of-dose failure was not observed based on the use of rescue medication after administration of single-entity, twice daily, hydrocodone ER capsules (Zohydro ER).