1. 1-Year Outcomes of Delayed Versus Immediate Intervention in Patients With Transient ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- Author
-
Arno P. van der Weerdt, Elvin Kedhi, Jorrit S. Lemkes, Maarten A.H. van Leeuwen, Albert C. van Rossum, Paul Knaapen, Martijn Meuwissen, Peter M. van de Ven, Stijn L. Brinckman, Koen M. Marques, Yolande Appelman, Colette E. Saraber, Gladys N. Janssens, Henk Everaars, Niels van Royen, Robin Nijveldt, Renicus S Hermanides, Niels J.W. Verouden, Koos Plomp, Cornelis P Allaart, Nina W. van der Hoeven, Jeroen Schaap, Alexander Nap, Jorik R. Timmer, Cardiology, APH - Methodology, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, Epidemiology and Data Science, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, and ACS - Microcirculation
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Infarction ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Revascularization ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Time-to-Treatment ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Recurrence ,Risk Factors ,Interquartile range ,Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ,Internal medicine ,Multicenter trial ,Humans ,Medicine ,ST segment ,Prospective Studies ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Acute Coronary Syndrome ,Aged ,Netherlands ,Ejection fraction ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Stroke Volume ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a delayed versus an immediate invasive approach on final infarct size and clinical outcome up to 1 year. BACKGROUND: Up to 24% of patients with acute coronary syndromes present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but show complete resolution of ST-segment elevation and symptoms before revascularization. Current guidelines do not clearly state whether these patients with transient STEMI should be treated with a STEMI-like or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome-like intervention strategy. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 142 patients with transient STEMI were randomized 1:1 to either delayed or immediate coronary intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 days and at 4-month follow-up to assess infarct size and myocardial function. Clinical follow-up was performed at 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: In the delayed (22.7 h) and the immediate (0.4 h) invasive groups, final infarct size as a percentage of the left ventricle was very small (0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 2.5%] vs. 0.4% [interquartile range: 0.0% to 3.5%]; p = 0.79), and left ventricular function was good (mean ejection fraction 59.3 +/- 6.5% vs. 59.9 +/- 5.4%; p = 0.63). In addition, the overall occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, consisting of death, recurrent infarction, and target lesion revascularization, up to 1 year was low and not different between both groups (5.7% vs. 4.4%, respectively; p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: At follow-up, patients with transient STEMI have limited infarction and well-preserved myocardial function in general, and delayed or immediate revascularization has no effect on functional outcome and clinical events up to 1 year.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF