1. Arm impairment and walking speed explain real-life activity of the affected arm and leg after stroke.
- Author
-
Andersson SA, Danielsson A, Ohlsson F, Wipenmyr J, and Alt Murphy M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Arm Injuries pathology, Stroke complications, Stroke Rehabilitation methods, Walking Speed physiology
- Abstract
Objective: To determine to what extent accelerometer-based arm, leg and trunk activity is associated with sensorimotor impairments, walking capacity and other factors in subacute stroke., Design: Cross-sectional study., Patients: Twenty-six individuals with stroke (mean age 55.4 years, severe to mild motor impairment)., Methods: Data on daytime activity were collected over a period of 4 days from accelerometers placed on the wrists, ankles and trunk. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to determine associations between free-living activity, clinical and demographic variables., Results: Arm motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) and walking speed explained more than 60% of the variance in daytime activity of the more-affected arm, while walking speed alone explained 60% of the more-affected leg activity. Activity of the less-affected arm and leg was associated with arm motor impairment (R2 = 0.40) and independence in walking (R2 = 0.59). Arm activity ratio was associated with arm impairment (R2 = 0.63) and leg activity ratio with leg impairment (R2 = 0.38) and walking speed (R2 = 0.27). Walking-related variables explained approximately 30% of the variance in trunk activity., Conclusion: Accelerometer-based free-living activity is dependent on motor impairment and walking capacity. The most relevant activity data were obtained from more-affected limbs. Motor impairment and walking speed can provide some information about real-life daytime activity levels.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF