Search

Patients with multiple myeloma can now be treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. We studied how CAR-T therapy is used for multiple myeloma. We also studied things that could help make this therapy easier for doctors to use. The CAR-T process takes 13 steps and 177 days. It begins with the choice to use the therapy and ends about 100 days after it is used. The process uses 46 different healthcare professionals and ten different locations. We found several possible changes that can improve this process. Of these changes, three stand out. First, improved teamwork between members of the care team can help them prepare for and resolve possible problems. Second, reducing insurance red tape will make it easier to provide CAR-T therapy to patients. Third, allowing use of CAR-T therapy in places other than hospitals can help more patients receive this therapy. If applied, these three things may lower the time needed to treat patients by 14.4% and may reduce costs by 13.2%.

Objective: To assess incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) among patients with recent spinal cord injury (SCI) who initiated intermittent catheterization (IC). Design: Retrospective chart revi...

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease characterized by dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain and syncope. As there is no known cure for PAH, the goal of treatment is to control symptoms and slow disease progression. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, has been indicated to improve exercise capacity in PAH in both the United States and the European Union since 2005; since 2009, it also has been indicated in the United States to delay clinical worsening. Patterns of sildenafil use in PAH patients have not been reported. Objectives: To describe patterns of treatment with sildenafil among commercially insured patients in the United States with PAH. Methods: Using a large U.S. healthcare claims database, we identified all patients with evidence of PAH (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] diagnosis codes 416.0, 416.8) and receipt of sildenafil between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2008. The date of each patient’s earliest pharmacy claim for sildenafil was designated as his or her “index date”; patients with

Collectively, coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are highly prevalent and are associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Improved ability to identify those at highest risk of these events may help optimize secondary prevention efforts in this population.Using the Optum Integrated Database, a healthcare claims database linked to electronic medical records (EMR), we identified patients with CAD and/or PAD between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2016. Index date was the earliest date on which chronic and stable disease was established. Follow-up ran from index date until earliest of patient death, plan disenrollment, or end of study. We developed multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to identify predictors of MACE and/or MALE, limited to measures presumed available to clinicians during patient encounters (e.g., age, presence of selected comorbidities).A total of 20,932 patients met all selection criteria; 86.9% had CAD and 26.1% had PAD; 13% (n = 2753) experienced MACE and/or MALE during a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, for a rate of 7.1 events per 100 person-years (PYs). We identified 11 predictors of MACE and/or MALE. Most (95.1%) patients had ≥ 1 predictors; 34.0% and 6.9% had ≥ 4 and ≥ 6, respectively. Incidence of MACE and/or MALE was strongly correlated with number of predictors (rReadily identifiable predictors can be used to identify subgroups with chronic CAD and/or PAD at elevated risk of MACE and/or MALE. Further research is required to understand the degree to which these subgroups may benefit from early identification and treatment with secondary prevention therapies.Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are both associated with elevated risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). The frequency of these events in patients with CAD or PAD, and their corresponding costs, are not well understood. Accordingly, we describe the incidence and cost of both MACE and MALE in patients with CAD or PAD. Using a database that included healthcare claims linked to electronic medical records, we identified patients with evidence of chronic CAD and PAD, respectively, between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2016. We assessed the occurrence of MACE (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular-related death) and MALE (critical limb ischemia, amputation, or peripheral artery disease-related revascularization). A total of 99,730 patients met all selection criteria: 86.0% had CAD, 25.8% had PAD, and 11.8% had both. Mean (±standard deviation) age was 67.7 (±11.5) years and 59.8% were male. During follow-up (mean: 1.8 years), 13.6% experienced MACE or MALE (6.3 per 100 person-years [PYs]), predominantly MACE (9.6% [4.3 per 100 PYs]). Adjusted 1-year healthcare costs were $44,495 greater in patients who experienced MACE or MALE (mean [95% confidence interval]: $64,099 [$33,254 to $123,557] vs $19,604 [$10,175 to $37,771]; p 0.001). In conclusion, approximately 1 in 7 patients with chronic CAD or PAD experiences additional MACE or MALE within approximately 2 years of follow-up; the relatively high risk and cost of these events highlight the need for new secondary prevention therapies that may improve outcomes in these patients.

Background: The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) due to tobacco and alcohol, respectively, has been declining, while that linked to human papilloma virus (HPV) has been rising. Epidemiologic, biologic, and prognostic characteristics of OPC differ by HPV-status. This study compared overall survival (OS) among HPV-positive and -negative patients with OPC in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records data from the Geisinger Health System to select patients diagnosed with OPC between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2015. Patients were designated as HPV-positive if the HPV or P16 test closest to the diagnosis date was positive. All other patients were deemed HPV-negative. Descriptive statistics and relevant statistical tests were used to compare baseline characteristics by HPV status; survival by HPV status was examined using Kaplan–Meier methods and multivariable Cox models. Results: In this study, 152 patients met all selection criteria; 110 (72.4%) were HPV-positive. HPV-positive patients were more likely to be men (89.1% vs 73.8%; P=.019) and to have lymph node involvement (88.2% vs 59.5%; P=.0008); they were less likely to have cerebrovascular disease (6.9% vs. 23.5%; P=.01), or distant metastases (1.8% vs 9.5%; P=.029) vs HPV-negative patients. Among HPV-positive patients, 75.5%, 12.7%, and 10.9% had squamous cell carcinoma NOS, basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma large cell non-keratinizing, respectively; corresponding values for HPV-negative patients were 85.7%, 0.0%, and 2.4%, respectively (P=.0013). HPV-positive patients were nominally younger than HPV-negative patients (median: 58 vs 61 years; P=.085). Log-rank test showed OS of HPV-positive patients (median OS from treatment initiation: not reached) is higher than of HPV-negative patients (median OS: 3.7 years; P=.002). In multivariable analyses, HPV-negative status was associated with increased mortality risk (P=.0035); other significant risk factors included alcohol use, diabetes, and distant metastases. Conclusions: HPV-positive status was associated with a decreased risk of mortality among OPC patients in this study. Despite the small sample size and potential violation of assumption of proportional hazard rate, this study underscores the prognostic implication of HPV status in OPC, which may have important ramifications in optimizing treatment decisions among this patient population.

CAR-T therapies represent a novel advance in oncology, albeit at list prices that exceed $373,000 (and that does not capture their total cost to the healthcare system). Since initial product approval in 2017, stakeholders and observers have attempted to investigate clinical and financial impacts of CAR-T therapies, and potential approaches to optimizing access and use by eligible patients. Most existing research is from a single stakeholder perspective - patients, providers, or payers - limiting the ability to draw broader conclusions on trends and offer prospective recommendations. To address this knowledge gap, we sought to identify and describe critical success factors for optimal delivery of CAR-T therapies. We undertook a qualitative study based on interviews with multiple US-based stakeholders including clinicians, financial and operations staff, and payer-insurers. Interviewees--which included oncologists (n=6), facility financial and operational personnel (n=4), and coverage and reimbursement decision-makers from US health plans (n=3)--completed structured, live, hour-long, interviews covering clinical, administrative, and general topics on patient access to CAR-T therapies. All clinicians had experience with ≥1 FDA-approved CAR-T therapies in both registered clinical trials and clinical practice; financial and operational personnel were affiliated with the same facilities as the clinicians, and also had real-world experience with these therapies; payer representatives were directors from a large national commercial plan, regional integrated delivery network, and a Medicare administrative contractor, respectively. Consensus facility feedback (i.e., clinicians, operational personnel) was that CAR-T is effective, and that their administrative processes had been optimized through care team coordination and experience-based efficiencies; in contrast, 2 of 3 payer interviewees expressed that, while CAR-T therapies have shown efficacy, their real-world benefits and applicability are less well-defined. Facility interviewees noted that: (1) reimbursement from commercial insurers is higher than from Medicare, with the latter associated with per-patient net-neutral or negative margins; (2) when possible, differential reimbursement between inpatient and outpatient settings may drive patient management towards outpatient care; and (3) negative-margin cases are currently deemed acceptable due to nonclinical factors (i.e., competitive pressure within a geographic region, anticipated branding/marketing value) and relatively small treated populations. From payer interviewees, CAR-T cost and perceived cost-to-value have made health plans more receptive to considering outcomes-based contracting, capitated provider payments, or other mitigation methods. Left unoptimized, these factors may adversely impact patient access to, and long-term provider attractiveness of, CAR-T therapies. All interviewees agreed that as the CAR-T marketplace grows, a strong preference exists for manufacturers to develop and communicate for their therapies durable outcomes data, clear and comprehensive reimbursement information, and competitive pricing. With the potential for many approved products in a single indication, and/or a single approval for indications with relatively large eligible patient populations, interviewees also conveyed interest in compelling health economic data. Facility interviewees also acknowledged that if it remains an overall net-negative margin service, new providers will be less able to start CAR-T programs and smaller programs may encounter sustainability issues, collectively jeopardizing patient access to these life-changing therapies. Overall, findings from this study suggest that during the continued maturation of the landscape, stakeholders will need to be proactive to ensure that CAR T-cell therapies can be maintained amidst financial and operational pressures. Several CAR-T therapy options for multiple myeloma are on the immediate horizon, likely increasing demand among eligible patients. Accordingly, the need to link real-world evidence of the clinical value and institutional investment burden of these therapies to reimbursement is imperative, both to insulate payers and enable clinicians to provide innovative therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Faber: Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive: Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; GlaxoSmith Kline: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Juno: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria. Hunter: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Crivera: Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Riccobono: Legend Biotech: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Garrett: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Jackson: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy; Janssen: Current Employment. Fowler: Amgen: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Janssen: Current Employment. Berger: Janssen Scientific Affairs: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lorden: Janssen Scientific Affairs: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stewart: Janssen Scientific Affairs: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Background The relative contribution of antimicrobial resistance versus delayed appropriate treatment to the clinical and economic burden of Enterobacteriaceae infections is not well understood. Methods Using a large US hospital database, we identified all admissions between July 2011 and September 2014 with evidence of serious Enterobacteriaceae infection. The “index date” was the earliest date on which a culture positive for Enterobacteriaceae was drawn. Infections were classified as carbapenem-resistant (CRE) or carbapenem-susceptible (CSE). Receipt of antimicrobials with activity against all index pathogens on the index date or ≤2 days thereafter was deemed as “timely”; all other instances were “delayed.” Associations between CRE status and delayed appropriate therapy on outcomes were estimated using inverse probability weighting and multivariate regression models (ie, logistic model for discharge destination and composite mortality [in-hospital death or discharge to hospice] or generalized linear model for duration of antibiotic therapy, hospital length of stay [LOS], and costs). Results A total of 50 069 patients met selection criteria; 514 patients (1.0%) had CRE. Overall, 67.5% of CSE patients (vs 44.6%, CRE) received timely appropriate therapy (P < .01). Irrespective of CRE status, patients who received delayed appropriate therapy had longer durations of antibiotic therapy and LOS, higher costs, lower likelihood of discharge to home, and greater likelihood of the composite mortality outcome (P for trend < .01). Conclusions Delayed appropriate therapy is a more important driver of outcomes than CRE, although the 2 factors are somewhat synergistic. Better methods of early CRE identification may improve outcomes in this patient population., Although resistance and delayed appropriate therapy both are associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes, delayed therapy appears to be the more important factor. As these 2 measures are correlated, earlier identification of CRE may improve outcomes.

Background To examine the clinical and economic burdens associated with delayed receipt of appropriate therapy among patients with Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections, stratified by antibiotic resistance status. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis using the Premier Hospital Database. Adult admissions (July 2011-September 2014) with evidence of complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-associated pneumonia, or bloodstream infection, length of stay (LOS) ≥1 days and a positive GNB culture from a site consistent with infection type (culture draw date = index date) were identified and stratified by antibiotic susceptibility to index pathogens. Delayed appropriate therapy was defined as no receipt of antibiotic(s) with relevant microbiological activity on or within 2 days of index date. Inverse probability weighting and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the association between delayed appropriate therapy and outcomes. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate postindex duration of antibiotic therapy, LOS and total in-hospital costs. Logistic models were used to evaluate discharge destination and in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice. Results A total of 56,357 patients with GNB infections were identified (resistant, n = 6,055; susceptible, n = 50,302). Delayed appropriate therapy was received by 2,800 (46.2%) patients with resistant and 16,585 (33.0%) patients with susceptible infections. Using multivariate analysis, delayed appropriate therapy was associated with worse outcomes including ∼70% increase in LOS, ∼65% increase in total in-hospital costs and ∼20% increase in the risk of in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice, regardless of susceptibility status. Conclusions Our results suggest that outcomes in patients with GNB infections, regardless of resistance status, significantly improve if timely appropriate therapy can be provided.

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a ceramide-infused skin barrier (CIB) versus other skin barriers (standard of care) among patients who have undergone ostomy creation.DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis, based on a decision-analytic model that was estimated using data from the ADVOCATE (A Study Determining Variances in Ostomy Skin Conditions And The Economic Impact) trial, which investigated stoma-related healthcare costs over 12 weeks among patients who recently underwent fecal ostomy, and from other sources.SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Analysis was based on a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients who recently underwent fecal ostomy; over a 1-year period, 500 patients were assumed to use CIB and 500 were assumed to use standard of care.METHODS: We adapted a previous economic model to estimate expected 1-year costs and outcomes among persons with a new ostomy assumed to use CIB versus standard of care. Outcomes of interest included peristomal skin complications (PSCs) (up to 2 during the 1-year period of interest) and quality-adjusted life days (QALDs); QALDs vary from 1, indicating a day of perfect health to 0, indicating a day with the lowest possible health (deceased). Subjects were assigned QALDs on a daily basis, with the value of the QALD on any given day based on whether the patient was experiencing a PSC. Costs included those related to skin barriers, ostomy accessories, and care of PSCs. The incremental cost-effectiveness of CIB versus standard of care was estimated as the incremental cost per PSC averted and QALD gained, respectively; net monetary benefit of CIB was also estimated. All analyses were run using the perspective of an Australian payer.RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, use of CIB was expected over a 1-year period to result in 0.16 fewer PSCs, an additional 0.35 QALDs, and a savings of A$180 (Australian dollars, US $137) in healthcare costs all versus standard of care. Management with CIB provided a net monetary benefit (calculated as the product of maximum willingness to pay for 1 QALD times additional QALDs with CIB less the incremental cost of CIB) of A$228 (US $174). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also completed; it revealed that 97% of model runs resulted in fewer expected PSCs with CIB; 92% of these runs resulted in lower expected costs with CIB.CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the CIB is a cost-effective skin barrier for persons living with an ostomy.

Prostacyclins play an important role in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Intravenous prostacyclin was the first disease-specific treatment for patients with PAH. Subcutaneous and nonparenteral (oral or inhaled) formulations have subsequently become available. However, data are lacking on how these different prostacyclin formulations are being used in clinical practice.To (a) conduct retrospective analyses of a large U.S. health care claims database to describe the characteristics of patients with PAH initiating prostacyclin therapy, and (b) evaluate their treatment patterns, health care resource use, and associated costs.Truven Commercial and Medicare databases were used to define annual cohorts of adults with PAH between January 1, 2010, and October 31, 2015. These patients were identified based on claims with ICD-9-CM diagnoses indicative of PAH (codes 416.0 or 416.8) and claims for PAH-specific medications and PAH-related procedures. Patients with evidence of receiving a prostacyclin were identified, and prostacyclin use was categorized as parenteral versus nonparenteral. Health care costs were assessed alternatively employing an all-cause and PAH-related perspective.Of 13,633 adults with identified PAH, 3,006 (22.0%) received a prostacyclin during at least 1 year of the study period, and annual prevalence of prostacyclin use ranged from 19.9% to 22.6%. Across calendar years, the median age of prostacyclin users ranged from 56 to 58 years, and 71.9%-75.8% were female. Among prostacyclin users, parenteral prostacyclin use declined from 63.2% in 2010 to 46.5% in 2015, while use of nonparenteral prostacyclins increased from 39.7% to 56.2% over the same period (both P0.001). Few patients (2.7%-4.1%) received both parenteral and nonparenteral formulations in a given calendar year. Among patients using prostacyclins, receipt of other PAH-specific medications increased from 62.1% in 2010 to 79.2% in 2015. Comparing the 6 months preceding the first prostacyclin prescription (any formulation) to the 6 months subsequent, mean overall health care costs rose from $61,243 to $119,283, and PAH-related health care costs increased from $58,815 to $116,661, driven mainly by PAH-specific medications, spending on which increased from $15,053 to $73,705 (all P0.001).While overall use of prostacyclins was relatively constant from 2010 to 2015, our findings revealed a shift from parenteral to nonparenteral formulations, coupled with increased prescribing of PAH-related medications from other drug classes. Further research is needed to better understand how these changes in patterns of prostacyclin use affect levels of health care resource utilization and costs and patients' overall quality of life.This research was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, a Janssen pharmaceutical company of JohnsonJohnson. Burger has received grant funding from Actelion, Gilead Sciences, and United Therapeutics; personal fees from Actelion and Gilead Sciences; and nonfinancial support from Actelion. Pruett, Lickert, and Drake are employees of Actelion. Pruett and Lickert own shares in Actelion. Berger and Murphy are employees of Evidera, a consultancy that received payment from Actelion to conduct this research. Pruett, Lickert, Berger, and Drake contributed to study conception and participated with Burger in study design. Lickert and Murphy performed the data analyses. Burger, Pruett, Lickert, Murphy, and Drake interpreted the data. All authors participated in manuscript drafting and/or critical revision, approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

To conduct a cost-effectiveness assessment of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) vs bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), from a U.S. payer perspective.A partitioned survival model was developed to estimate expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), direct costs and incremental costs per QALY and LY gained associated with use of Rd vs VMP over a patient's lifetime. Information on the efficacy and safety of Rd and VMP was based on data from multinational phase III clinical trials and a network meta-analysis. Pre-progression direct costs included the costs of Rd and VMP, treatment of adverse events (including prophylaxis) and routine care and monitoring associated with MM. Post-progression direct costs included costs of subsequent treatment(s) and routine care and monitoring for progressive disease, all obtained from published literature and estimated from a U.S. payer perspective. Utilities were obtained from the aforementioned trials. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually.Relative to VMP, use of Rd was expected to result in an additional 2.22 LYs and 1.47 QALYs (discounted). Patients initiated with Rd were expected to incur an additional $78,977 in mean lifetime direct costs (discounted) vs those initiated with VMP. The incremental costs per QALY and per LY gained with Rd vs VMP were $53,826 and $35,552, respectively. In sensitivity analyses, results were found to be most sensitive to differences in survival associated with Rd vs VMP, the cost of lenalidomide and the discount rate applied to effectiveness outcomes.Rd was expected to result in greater LYs and QALYs compared with VMP, with similar overall costs per LY for each regimen. Results of this analysis indicated that Rd may be a cost-effective alternative to VMP as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with MM, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio well within the levels for recent advancements in oncology.

Objectives: We estimated the total US hospital costs associated with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) admissions as well as the admissions that may have been potential candidates for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Methods: We assessed inpatient admissions for ABSSSI from the Premier database (2011–2014), focusing on all admissions of adults with length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 days and a primary diagnosis of erysipelas, cellulitis/abscess, or wound infection. We performed a detailed analysis of 2014 admissions for patient, treatment, hospital, and economic characteristic variables. Using published selection criteria, we identified a subset of patients admitted in 2014 who may have been potential candidates for OPAT. Results: We analyzed 277,971 admissions. In 2014, most admissions were for cellulitis without major complications or comorbidities; mean ± SD LOS was 4.0 ± 3.0 days, and total hospital cost per admission was $6400 ± $6874, 54% of which was attributable to room costs. Among 2014 admissions, 14% involved patients with clinical characteristics suggesting that they were consistent with guideline recommendations for exclusive treatment with OPAT. Compared with all admissions in the year, these admissions were of younger patients (aged 50 vs. 55 years), admitted more frequently for cellulitis (90% vs. 70%), with shorter LOS (2.8 ± 1.8 days), and lower mean total hospital cost per admission ($4080 ± $3066). Conclusions: Admissions for ABSSSI impose a substantial cost to US hospitals, with half of costs attributable to room costs. When extrapolated to all US patients admitted to the hospital for ABSSSI during 2014, had OPAT guidelines been universally followed, admissions may have been reduced by 14%, thereby saving US hospitals $161 million.

Although clinical guidelines for management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in non-intensive care unit ("non-ICU") hospitalized patients have changed substantially over the last decade, it is unknown how treatment of this disease has evolved over this period.Using data from100 U.S. hospitals, we identified all adults (aged ≥18 years) hospitalized for CAP between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2009 ("study period"). We excluded patients admitted to ICU24 hours of admission, those not starting antibiotics24 hours of admission, those not receiving antibiotics for ≥48 hours (if alive), and those with probable healthcare-associated pneumonia. We defined "initial therapy" as all parenteral antibiotics received ≤24 hours of admission, and we examined changes in such therapy over the study period. The statistical significance of changes in initial therapy was ascertained using 2-tailed χ tests.We identified 40,392 patients who met all selection criteria. In 2000, the most frequently used initial regimens were levofloxacin (24.0% of all such admissions), ceftriaxone (9.0%), cefotaxime (7.3%), ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin (3.2%) and azithromycin plus cefotaxime (3.0%); in 2009, they were ceftriaxone plus azithromycin (18.5%), levofloxacin (12.7%), ceftriaxone (6.6%), moxifloxacin (4.7%) and ceftriaxone + levofloxacin (3.2%). Use of single-agent regimens declined between 2000 and 2009 (from 48.2%-30.0%); use of vancomycin almost doubled (13.1%-23.3%). All findings were statistically significant (P0.01).Initial antibiotic therapy for non-ICU CAP has changed substantially in the United States over the past decade, in line with evidence of widespread antibiotic resistance, evolving treatment guidelines and, most recently, quality improvement initiatives that tie hospital payments to guideline-based care.

Based in part on the pivotal COMPASS trial, “vascular dose” rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice/day) (+ aspirin [ASA]) was recently approved to reduce risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). As patients in clinical

Objective: To characterize adherence with antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, and beta blockers as prophylaxis against migraine in typical clinical practice. Methods: Using a large US health insurance claims database (calendar years 2003 to 2005), we identified all patients with migraine who began prophylaxis with selected antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, or beta blockers (“study agents”). Patients not continuously enrolled for 6 months prior to start of prophylaxis (“pretreatment”) and for 6 months subsequently (“follow-up”) were excluded. Treatment cohorts were constituted based on the type of prophylaxis received. Adherence with migraine prophylaxis was examined by type of agent received using medication possession ratios (MPRs), defined as total days with medication divided by total follow-up days. MPR

Objectives To examine patterns of health care utilization and costs in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) who begin treatment with benzodiazepine anxiolytics as add-on therapy. Study Design In a large US health insurance database, we identified all patients with evidence of GAD (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 300.02) who received ≥90 days of therapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007. Among these patients, we selected those who initiated a course of benzodiazepine add-on therapy. Designating the date of initial receipt of a benzodiazepine as the “index date,” we examined health care utilization and costs over the 6-month period preceding this date (“pre-index”) and the 12-month period following it (“follow-up”). Results A total of 2131 patients met all study inclusion criteria. Patients averaged 32 days of therapy with benzodiazepines (median [interquartile range] = 20 [10-30]); 13% of patients received >90 days of therapy, however. In general, levels of health care utilization during the first 6 months of follow-up were higher than those during the pre-index period; between months 7 and 12 of follow-up, however, they were somewhat lower than pre-index levels. Mean (SD) total health care costs were $5148 ($10,658), $6325 ($15,741), and $5373 ($11,230) during pre-index, months 1-6 of follow-up, and months 7-12 of follow-up, respectively. Conclusions Levels of health care utilization and costs increase following initiation of add-on therapy with a benzodiazepine in patients with GAD receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. Although duration of add-on therapy is typically brief, some patients are treated for >90 days, raising potential concerns about risks of dependency and sedation.

Background Patients with serious GNB infections who receive DAT have worse outcomes. Most studies that have examined this issue include both antibiotic-resistant and susceptible pathogens. It is difficult to assign causality as DAT is correlated with resistance, which is associated with poorer prognosis. Our objective was to assess association between DAT and outcomes among patients with GNB infection, stratified by antibiotic susceptibility status. Methods Hospitalized adults between 7/2011–9/2014 were identified from Premier Hospital Database. Patients were diagnosed with complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-associated pneumonia, or bloodstream infection, and had a positive culture for GNB from a site consistent with infection type (date of culture draw was index date). Patients were required to receive antibiotics on this date or ≤2 days after. Delayed therapy was defined as no receipt of an antibiotic with microbiologic activity during this period. Patients were stratified by antibiotic-resistant GNB (Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem‐resistant (CR) Enterobacteriaceae, CR Pseudomonas sp., or multi‐drug-resistant Pseudomonas sp.) vs. antibiotic-susceptible GNB counterparts. Inverse probability weighting and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the association between DAT and outcomes. Logistic models were used for composite mortality (in-hospital death or discharge to hospice) and discharge to home. Generalized linear models were used for post-index duration of antibiotic therapy, hospital length of stay (LOS), and costs. Results A total of 6,055 resistant and 50,302 susceptible infections were identified; 2,800 and 16,585, respectively, received DAT. In multivariate analyses, DAT was associated with worse outcomes, including a 20% increased risk of composite mortality and an approximate 70% increase in LOS and total costs, respectively. The relative impact of DAT was nearly identical by antibiotic-resistant status (Figure). Conclusion Our study indicates that DAT is independently associated with poorer outcomes in serious infections due to GNB, irrespective of resistance status. Disclosures N. G. Bonine, Allergan plc: Employee, Salary. A. Berger, Allergan plc: Consultant, Consulting fee. R. Wang, Evidera: Employee, Salary. T. Bhagnani, Allergan plc: Consultant, Consulting fee. P. Gillard, Allergan plc: Employee, Salary. T. Lodise, Allergan plc: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium.

Objective To examine patterns of pharmacotherapy and health care utilization and costs prior to total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Using a large US health insurance claims database, we identified all patients with OA who were ages ≥40 years and had undergone TKR or THR between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007. Patients with

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) increase risk of cardiovascular (CV) and limb events. We ascertained “real-world” rates and economic impact of these events. We identified adults in a US database containing claims and medical records between 1/1/2009 - 9/30/2015

Objective: The aim of this analysis was to assess alternative methods of identification of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) in health care claims databases for possible use in future analyses of costs of this treatment modality. Methods: Using a US health insurance claims database spanning January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, we identified all patients with renal failure who satisfied a case-finding algorithm for PD anticipated to be highly specific, but not necessarily sensitive—namely, ≥2 claims for PD-related physician services (algorithm 1). All claims from these patients were assessed to identify additional PD-related codes, from which 6 additional algorithms were developed, each of which focused on specific categories of billing codes (eg, diagnostic, procedural/service, equipment). Patient selection was then reimplemented using these alternative algorithms. Concordance between the various algorithms and the extent to which resulting samples were similar in terms of patient characteristics, health care resource utilization, and costs were assessed. Results: We identified a total of 132,274 patients in the database with ≥1 claim for renal failure and valid enrollment data. Among these patients, a total of 2329 satisfied case-selection criteria for algorithm 1, and 4031 patients met criteria for at least 1 of the 7 algorithms for PD. The most sensitive algorithm identified 2859 patients who might have received PD; the least sensitive, 211. Concordance between algorithms was relatively poor. Patients identified using each algorithm were similar, however, with respect to mean age (45–50 years), sex (54%–56% male), and the prevalence of selected comorbidities. Annualized median health care costs were similar across the various algorithms (range, US $80,967-$118,668). Conclusions: Based on the results from this analysis, it seems that health care providers bill insurers for PD-related care using a variety of codes. Investigators using health insurance claims data for analyses of patients treated with PD need to take this into account.

Purpose: To examine the use of pregabalin in patients with painful neuropathic disorders under the care of general practitioners (GPs) in the U.K. Materials and Methods: Using a large U.K. database of GP encounters, we identified all persons aged ≥ 18 years with at least one GP encounter with a diagnosis of a painful neuropathic disorder (eg, postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic peripheral neuropathy) between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2006. Among these patients, we then identified those who initiated therapy with pregabalin; the date of initial receipt of pregabalin was designated the “index date.” We then examined use of pregabalin over the 6-month period following this date (“follow-up”), as well as changes in the use of other pain-related medications (eg, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs], other antiepileptics [AEDs]) between the 6-month period preceding the index date (“pretreatment”) and follow-up. Patients with less than 6 months of pretreatment and follow-up data were excluded, as were those without any encounters during pretreatment for a painful neuropathic disorder. Results: A total of 1,400 patients (1.4% of all identified patients with painful neuropathic disorders) initiated therapy with pregabalin and met all other entry criteria; mean age was 62 years, and 58% were women. During pretreatment, most (54%) patients received three or more different types of pain-related medications. During follow-up, patients averaged four prescriptions for pregabalin, totaling 93 therapy days. Compared with pretreatment, fewer patients received other pain-related medications during follow-up, including TCAs (37% during pretreatment vs. 27% during follow-up), opioids (64% vs. 55%), and AEDs other than pregabalin (36% vs. 16%) (all P

To examine characteristics and patterns of healthcare utilization of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) under the care of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany.Retrospective cohort study, using a large electronic database with information on GP encounters in Germany (IMS MediPlus). We identified all patients, agedor =18 years, with any encounters for FM (ICD-10 diagnosis code M79.7) between February 1, 2004 and January 31, 2007. We also constituted a comparison group consisting of randomly selected patients with one or more GP encounters - but none for FM - during this period, who we matched to FM patients based on age and sex. Characteristics and healthcare utilization of patients in the FM and comparison groups were then examined over the 1-year period, February 1, 2006-January 31, 2007.Prevalence of co-morbidities; use of pain-related pharmacotherapy; number of GP office visits; number of specialist referrals; and number of sick notes (physician-excused absences from work).The study sample consisted of 4983 FM patients and an identical number in the comparison group. Mean age was 58 years; 87% were women. The prevalence of various co-morbidities was greater among FM patients, including painful neuropathies (33% vs. 18% for comparison group) and depression (20% vs. 5%) (both p0.01); more FM patients also received pain-related pharmacotherapy (67% vs. 28%; p0.01). Compared with patients in the comparison group, FM patients averaged approximately twice as many GP visits (11.4 [SD=10.1] vs. 5.8 [7.5]), referrals (4.5 [5.2] vs. 2.2 [3.6]), and sick notes (0.6 [1.8] vs. 0.3 [1.1]) (all p0.01).Information in the study database is limited to GP encounters, and the sensitivity and specificity of our case-finding methods are unknown.Patients with FM under the care of GPs in Germany have comparatively more co-morbidities and higher levels of healthcare utilization.

Initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) usually is empiric. We explored the economic consequences of failure of such therapy in this patient population.Using a large U.S. multi-institutional database, we identified all hospitalized adults admitted between April 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004; who had any cIAI; underwent laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess ("surgery"); and received intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Initial therapy was characterized in terms of all IV antibiotics received, on the day of or one day before initial surgery. Antibiotic failure was designated on the basis of the need for reoperation or receipt of other IV antibiotics postoperatively. Switches to narrower spectrum agents and changes in regimen prior to discharge with no other evidence of clinical failure were not counted as antibiotic failures. Using multivariable linear regression, duration of IV antibiotic therapy, hospital length of stay, and total inpatient charges were compared between patients who did and did not fail initial therapy. Mortality was compared using multivariable logistic regression.Among 6,056 patients who met the study entrance criteria, 22.4% failed initial antibiotic therapy. Patients who failed received an additional 5.6 days of IV antibiotic therapy (10.4 total days [95% confidence interval 10.1, 10.8] days vs. 4.8 total days [4.8, 4.9] for those not failing), were hospitalized an additional 4.6 days (11.6 total days [11.3, 11.9] vs. 6.9 total days [6.8, 7.0], respectively), and incurred $6,368 in additional inpatient charges ($16,520 [$16,131, $16,919] vs. $10,152 [$10,027, $10,280]) (all, p0.01). They also were more likely to die in the hospital (9.5% vs. 1.3%; multivariable odds ratio 3.58 [95% confidence interval 2.53, 5.06]).Failure of initial IV antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with cIAIs is associated with longer hospitalization, higher hospital charges, and a higher mortality rate.

Patients with cancer may receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), including darbepoetin alfa (DA) or epoetin alfa (EA), to treat cancer-related anemia (CRA). DA and EA differ, however, with respect to their assumed duration of effect and thus their approved frequency of dosing, complicating direct comparison of their doses and costs.The objective of this study was to examine, from the perspective of a third-party payer, patterns of use and costs of DA and EA in patients with CRA, using episode-based methodology to account for differences in assumed duration of effect and frequency of dosing with these products.Using a large US health insurance claims database, we identified all patients with cancer who received ESAs between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2005 (study period). For each such patient, we identified all unique episodes of care (EOCs) with DA or EA, and then compared mean weekly dose and cost of ESA therapy within these EOCs, which were calculated using the ratio of total dose received and total cost of ESA therapy, respectively, to total EOC duration; only the first EOC for each patient was considered. EOCs were assumed to begin on the date of first ESA administration within the study period, and end on the date of final ESA administration (within the episode) plus an assumed duration of effect based on the ESA received and corresponding dose. We also estimated the ratio of mean weekly dose of EA (in units) to mean weekly dose of DA (in micrograms) (EA/DA weekly dose ratio). Multivariate regression was used to control for differences in baseline characteristics of EA and DA patients.We identified a total of 1226 patients with complete EOCs with ESAs (EA, 381; DA, 845). DA patients were more likely to have had evidence of receipt of chemotherapy (54% vs 47% for EA; P = 0.02); they also had more comorbidities (mean Charlson comorbidity scores, 4.3 and 3.9, respectively; P0.01). Estimated mean (95% CI) weekly dose within EOCs was 97 microg (94-99) for DA, and 43,184 U (40,181-46,589) for EA; EA/DA weekly dose ratio was 445:1. Adjustment for differences in patient characteristics yielded a slightly lower ratio (403:1). Results were sensitive to the exclusion of EOCs consisting of a single administration of ESA therapy and/or the addition of an assumed duration of effect to the final ESA dose administered.Cost comparisons of DA and EA are sensitive to the assumed duration of effect added to the final dose of ESA therapy, especially for EOCs with relatively few administrations.

Summary Purpose: To examine the characteristics and healthcare costs of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) patients in clinical practice.

We developed a decision-analytic model to examine the economic impact of shifting the locus of care for patients with painful neuropathies from specialists to GPs. The impetus for such a shift was assumed to be a formal education program, focusing on the recognition and treatment of neuropathic pain, conducted for GPs. In the model, all patients with neuropathic pain were assumed to initiate care with their GPs and then be referred to specialists and, ultimately, pain clinics as required for adequate pain control. Two alternative scenarios were examined--the "current" arrangement in which most patients were assumed to be referred for treatment by specialists and pain clinics and a "hypothetical" arrangement in which GPs were assumed to play an expanded role in the treatment of neuropathic pain and which, therefore, often precluded the need for referral. The model was populated with clinical, epidemiologic, and economic data from Norway. A total of 34,951 persons in Norway were estimated to seek care for painful neuropathies each year. The formal education program was assumed to cost 1.5 million Kroner (NOK). Shifting the locus of care from specialists to GPs would result in 4,715 additional GP visits, but 12,123 fewer specialist visits and 7,967 fewer visits to pain clinics. This change would result in estimated savings to the Norwegian health-care system in 2004 of 74.1 million NOK (approx. US $11.9 million). A partial shift in the locus of care of painful neuropathies from specialists to GPs may result in substantial cost savings to the Norwegian health-care system.

Using a large US health insurance claims database, we identified all persons aged 18 years or older with 2 or more medical encounters in calendar year 2000 for painful neuropathic disorders (PNDs). We also identified an age- and gender-matched group of patients without PNDs (matched control subjects). We then compared the clinical characteristics and economic costs of PND patients with those of matched control subjects. There were a total of 55,686 patients with PNDs in the study database. The most frequently noted PNDs were back and neck pain with neuropathic involvement (62.3% of PND patients), causalgia (12.1%), and diabetic neuropathy (10.8%). In comparison with matched control subjects, PND patients were more likely to have other pain-related conditions, including fibromyalgia (6.0% vs 0.6% for control subjects), osteoarthritis (13.6% vs 3.6%), and other chronic comorbidities, such as coronary heart disease (13.6% vs 6.5%) and depression (6.4% vs 2.3%). Total calendar year 2000 health care charges were 3-fold higher for PND patients than matched control subjects ($17,355 vs $5,715, respectively). Our results suggest that patients with PNDs are generally in poorer health and have higher health care costs than their peers without these conditions. Perspective Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and opioids was widespread in patients with PNDs, while relatively few received antiepileptic drugs and tricyclic antidepressants, both of which are often more effective against neuropathic pain. Our study raises questions about the optimality of PND treatment in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially costly complication of major orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVE To estimate the economic consequences of VTE following major orthopedic surgery. METHODS Using a large healthcare claims database, we identified all patients who underwent total hip replacement, major knee surgery, or hip fracture repair from January 1993 to December 1998. Patients with clinical VTE (cases) were identified based on a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 90 days of surgery (index admission) and ≥1 prescription for warfarin or unfractionated heparin within 30 days of the date of initial VTE diagnosis. Each case was matched (using age and procedure type) to 2 randomly selected patients who did not have any claims for clinical VTE (matched controls). Utilization and billed charges were then examined over a 90-day period following admission. Cases were stratified based on whether VTE was first noted during the index admission or thereafter. RESULTS A total of 11 960 patients were identified who underwent total hip replacement, major knee surgery, or hip fracture repair (n = 3171, 3955, 4834, respectively). Over a 90-day period, 259 patients (2.2%) developed clinical VTE. Most cases (61.8%) occurred after hospital discharge. For patients with in-hospital VTE, mean length of stay for the index admission was 4.5 days longer than that of matched controls (11.1 vs 6.6); by day 90, there was a 5.4-day difference in total hospital days. Mean billed charges for the index admission were $17 552 higher ($52 037 vs $34 485); the difference rose to $18 834 by day 90 ($54 480 vs $35 646). For patients who developed clinical VTE following hospital discharge, there was a 3.4-day difference in total hospital days at day 90 (10.2 vs 6.8) as a result of readmissions for VTE; mean total billed charges at day 90 were $5765 higher ($41 411 vs $35 646) CONCLUSION Among patients who have undergone major orthopedic surgery, the economic consequences of VTE are substantial, regardless of the setting in which it occurs.

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic painful disorder that sometimes develops after an acute episode of herpes zoster infection (shingles) and can be difficult to treat. Although opioids are sometimes effective for chronic neuropathic pain, adverse effects are common, particularly among the elderly, and may cause many patients to discontinue therapy. Objective: This study examined changes in opioid use after the initiation of gabapentin therapy in patients with PHN. Methods: A health insurance claims database was used to identify all persons aged ≥ 18 years who began therapy with gabapentin in 2000 or 2001 and had either (1) ≥2 medical claims with a diagnosis of PHN during the 6-month period before the first receipt of gabapentin (index date) or (2) 1 such claim ≤14 days before the index date. Persons who were not continuously eligible for medical and drug benefits for 6 months before and after the index date (pretreatment and follow-up, respectively) were dropped from the study sample. Use of opioids, including both short- and long-acting formulations, was compared between pretreatment and follow-up. Patients were stratified in the study analyses by whether they received 1 or ≥2 prescriptions for gabapentin. Results: Forty-five patients with PHN began therapy with gabapentin during the period of interest; 35 (77.8%) received ≥2 prescriptions for gabapentin. The proportion of patients receiving opioids decreased significantly between pretreatment and follow-up (from 88.9% to 71.1%; P = 0.03); the mean number of opioid prescriptions per patient also decreased significantly (from 3.9 to 3.0; P = 0.03). These reductions were observed only in patients who received ≥2 prescriptions for gabapentin; there was no significant change in opioid use among those who received only 1 prescription for gabapentin. Conclusion: In this study, initiation of gabapentin therapy in patients with PHN was associated with a reduction in the use of opioid analgesics.