Search

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and transsacral fixation are challenging procedures requiring extensive knowledge of sacral anatomy to avoid damaging nearby neurovascular structures. Greater knowledge of anatomical screw trajectory and size allowances would be helpful to guide surgical placement. An anatomical study of 40 cadaveric sacra in specimens ages 18-65 was performed. Three-dimensional surface scans were obtained, and computer modeling software was used to simulate a 7.3 mm diameter screw with 1 mm buffer inserted orthogonal to the sacroiliac joint in the pelvic inlet and outlet views. Transsacral screws were also inserted into S1 and S2 vertebrae. For screws orthogonal to the sacroiliac joint, the overall mean screw insertion angle was 4.1° ± 7.5° (range, -18.3° to 22.0°) in the inlet view in the posterior to anterior direction, and 21.7° ± 5.1° (range, 8.2°-36.3°) in the outlet view in the caudal to cranial direction. Before breaching the sacrum, the range of sacral tunnel lengths was between 31.1 and 70.1 mm with a range of diameters between 9.3 and 13.3 mm. Transsacral screws inserted into either the S1 or S2 vertebrae did not breach the sacrum in 40% (16/40) at each level. 30% (12/40) of sacra could not safely accommodate both S1 and S2 transsacral screws. There is an initial screw insertion angle range of -4° to 12° in the inlet view and 16°-27° in the outlet view. There was always adequate size to accept a 7.3 mm or larger screw.

OBJECTIVE To compare immediate quality of open reduction of femoral neck fractures by alternative surgical approaches. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENTS Eighty adults 18-65 years of age with isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or -B3 femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. INTERVENTION Thirty-two modified Smith-Petersen anterior approaches versus 48 Watson-Jones anterolateral approaches for open reduction performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME Reduction quality as assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. RESULTS No difference was observed in the rate of acceptable reduction by modified Smith-Petersen (81%) versus Watson-Jones (81%) approach (risk difference null, 95% confidence interval -17.4% to 17.4%, P = 1.00) with 90.4% panel agreement (Fleiss' weighted κ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses did not identify a significant difference in the rate of acceptable reduction between approaches when stratified by Pauwels angle, basicervical or transcervical fracture location, or posterior comminution. The Smith-Petersen approach afforded a better reduction when preoperative skeletal traction was not applied (RR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.52] vs. RR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.08], P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS No difference was observed in the quality of open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults when a Watson-Jones anterolateral approach versus a modified Smith-Petersen anterior approach was performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Despite the rising prevalence of arthroplasty and aging population, limited data exist regarding differences in periprosthetic fracture clinical outcomes compared with native counterparts. This study compares differences in hospital treatment, morbidity, and mortality associated with periprosthetic distal femur fractures at an urban level 1 trauma center. We retrospectively reviewed all adult AO/OTA type 33 fractures (526) that presented to our institution between 2009 and 2018. In total, 54 native and 54 periprosthetic fractures were matched by age and gender. We recorded demographics, operative measures, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. We used McNemar's and paired t-tests for analysis where appropriate (p

Objectives To determine (1) which factors are associated with the choice to perform an open reduction and (2) by adjusting for these factors, if the choice of reduction method is associated with reoperation. Design Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and chart review. Setting Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. Patients Two hundred thirty-four adults 18-65 years of age with an isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or type 31-B3 femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation with minimum of 6-month follow-up or reoperation. Exclusion criteria were pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures, and primary arthroplasty. Intervention Open or closed reduction technique during internal fixation. Main outcome Cox proportional hazard of reoperation adjusting for propensity score for open reduction based on injury, demographic, and medical factors. Reduction quality was assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. Results Median follow-up was 1.5 years. One hundred six (45%) patients underwent open reduction. Reduction quality was not significantly affected by open versus closed approach (71% vs. 69% acceptable, P = 0.378). The propensity to receive an open reduction was associated with study center; younger age; male sex; no history of injection drug use, osteoporosis, or cerebrovascular disease; transcervical fracture location; posterior fracture comminution; and surgery within 12 hours. A total of 35 (33%) versus 28 (22%) reoperations occurred after open versus closed reduction (P = 0.056). Open reduction was associated with a 2.4-fold greater propensity-adjusted hazard of reoperation (95% confidence interval 1.3-4.4, P = 0.004). A total of 35 (15%) patients underwent subsequent total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. Conclusions Open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in nonelderly adults is associated with a greater hazard of reoperation without significantly improving reduction. Prospective randomized trials are indicated to confirm a causative effect of open versus closed reduction on outcomes after femoral neck fracture. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Case We present the case of a 15-year-old girl who has a history of Ponseti casting followed by Achilles tenotomies for congenital clubfeet as an infant and subsequently suffered an acute traumatic midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture on the left and midsubstance Achilles tendinosis on the right. Conclusions Traumatic pediatric Achilles ruptures are rare. There are no prior reported cases in patients with a history of Achilles tenotomy, despite it being a described potential complication. This case highlights the potential for an Achilles rupture years after tenotomy and presents surgical repair as a satisfactory treatment option for Achilles ruptures in adolescents.

Background The anatomy of the undulating distal femoral physis may be relevant to growth disturbance after physeal fractures and screw fixation about the physis. The surface anatomy of this physis has not been well described. Methods We performed an anatomic study on 26 cadaveric distal femoral epiphyses in specimens 3 to 18 years of age. High-resolution 3-dimensional surface scans were obtained and analyzed to determine the heights, approximate surface areas, and locations of the major undulations. Results Gross examination revealed lateral and anteromedial peripheral notches at the metaphyseal-epiphyseal junction, which deepen with advancing skeletal maturity. Within the epiphysis, there are 3 major undulations: a central ridge, lateral ridge, and medial peak, with mean heights of 5.5 mm (range, 2.9 to 9.8 mm), 2.5 mm (1.0 to 5.7 mm), and 2.9 mm (0.9 to 4.7 mm), respectively. The normalized height and surface area of each undulation decreased with increasing age, most dramatically in the central ridge. With respect to a line connecting the medial and lateral aspects of the physis, we found that the central peak passes more superior with younger age, and tends to be more posteriorly located. The lowest point of the physis is located either anteromedial or posterolateral. Conclusions The central ridge, lateral ridge, and medial peak are the 3 major undulations in the distal femoral physis. The central ridge has the greatest height and most dramatic decrease in relative size with increasing age, suggesting structural importance. This anatomic data can guide metaphyseal and epiphyseal screw fixation. Clinical relevance This study provides quantitative data on the topographic anatomy of the distal femoral physis, which can guide screw placement about the physis. These data may help identify fractures patterns with a greater risk of growth disturbance and key radiographic landmarks for guiding fracture reduction.

Femoroacetabular impingement has been proposed as a cause of early osteoarthritis, but it is not known how this develops over time or whether the shape of the proximal femur influences this risk.(1) Which areas of the acetabulum are worn more frequently by individuals with a cam deformity of the proximal femur? (2) Do observed acetabular wear patterns differ based on the etiology of the cam deformity? (3) Do wear patterns of individuals with a cam deformity differ based on an individual's age?We examined 645 corresponding femora and acetabuli from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection and determined the offset and alpha angle using photographs; 370 specimens met inclusion criteria and were examined for signs of wear and the locations of wear were recorded. Specimens were separated into eight subgroups based on age either younger than 40 years or older than 60 years, alpha angle greater or less than 55°, and degree of anterior head-neck offset. We compared the prevalence of wear between groups in each location.Individuals with abnormal geometry of the proximal femur demonstrated different wear patterns from individuals with normal geometry. There were few differences in wear patterns identified based on the etiology of the femoral deformity. Abnormal femoral geometry was associated with more frequent wear primarily at the anterosuperior acetabulum for individuals younger than 40 years of age and globally for individuals older than 60 years of age.Femoral geometry appears to influence the pattern of acetabular wear occurring over time.

Background: It has been proposed that the epiphyseal tubercle on the inferior surface of the capital femoral epiphysis may be responsible for the clinical distinction between a stable and an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The anatomy of the tubercle and its relationship to the lateral epiphyseal vessels have not previously been rigorously defined. Methods: Twenty-two cadaveric capital femoral epiphyses from donors who had been three to seventeen years of age were analyzed and then digitized with use of a high-resolution laser scanner. The height, location, and approximate surface area of the epiphyseal tubercle were measured and were normalized to the size of the entire capital femoral epiphysis. Results: In all specimens except that from the youngest donor, the foramina for the lateral epiphyseal vessels were visible and were located directly superior to the epiphyseal tubercle. The height of the epiphyseal tubercle was 4.4 ± 1.1 mm. When normalized to the overall size of the capital femoral epiphysis, the relative height (r = 0.71) and relative area (r = 0.56) of the epiphyseal tubercle decreased with increasing age. The epiphyseal tubercle was consistently located in the posterosuperior quadrant, with its position being more posterior and less superior in specimens from younger donors. Conclusions: The epiphyseal tubercle appears to be a major stabilizer, or keystone, of the capital femoral epiphysis and the lateral epiphyseal vessels. Its relative decrease in height and surface area with increasing age may help explain the susceptibility of individuals to SCFE in adolescence: in a stable SCFE, the physis rotates on the tubercle; however, in an unstable SCFE, the tubercle dislodges, leading to more substantial displacement of the capital femoral epiphysis and the lateral epiphyseal vessels, risking osteonecrosis. Clinical Relevance: These anatomic data offer a possible insight into the pathogenesis of SCFE and the potential complication of osteonecrosis. When fixation of an SCFE is performed with a single screw, the posterosuperior quadrant should be avoided to maximize any possible derotational effect of the epiphyseal tubercle.