1. Arcobacter species isolated from human stool samples, animal products, ready-to-eat salad mixes, and ambient water: prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and virulence gene profiles.
- Author
-
Niyayesh H, Rahimi E, Shakerian A, and Khamesipour F
- Subjects
- Humans, Animals, Prevalence, Meat microbiology, Food Microbiology, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Virulence Factors genetics, Drug Resistance, Bacterial genetics, Water Microbiology, Chickens microbiology, Virulence genetics, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections microbiology, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections epidemiology, Milk microbiology, Cattle, Arcobacter genetics, Arcobacter drug effects, Arcobacter isolation & purification, Arcobacter pathogenicity, Feces microbiology, Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology
- Abstract
Introduction: Arcobacter species are emerging foodborne pathogens increasingly associated with human illness worldwide. They are commonly found in the gastrointestinal tracts of animals and are frequently isolated from various food sources, including raw meat, poultry, and seafood. The aim of this study is to investigate the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Arcobacter spp. isolated from human stool samples, animal products, ready-to-eat salad mixes, and ambient water, assess the presence of resistance genes, and explore their potential implications for public health., Methods: In this study, a total of 683 samples were collected from the Shahrekord area over a 12-month period. Samples were obtained from human stool, chicken meat, raw cow milk, RTE salad mixes, and environmental water sources. Two different methods were used to detect Arcobacter, depending on the sample type: bacteriological isolation and identification, and molecular identification. After identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify ten putative Arcobacter virulence and resistance genes., Findings: The results revealed that Arcobacter spp. were present in 26.06% (178 out of 683) of the tested samples, with varying isolation rates across different sample types. A. butzleri being the most commonly isolated species across all sample types, while A. cryaerophilus was restricted to RTE salads, surface waters, and chicken meat. Notably, A. skirrowii was only isolated from chicken meat and environmental water. The differences of Arcobacter spp. in prevalence between the sample types were statistically significant (p < 0.05), and no significant seasonal variation was found across the sampling periods (p > 0.05). PCR analysis for ten putative virulence genes indicated that the cadF gene was present in all Arcobacter isolates. Similarly, 83.33% of the tested strains harbored the ciaB gene, while other genes were less frequently detected. Regarding resistance genes, tet(O) (7.69%) was the most identified gene, followed by blaOXA-61 (4.37%)., Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights the alarming prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Arcobacter spp. Monitoring Arcobacter spp. resistance can be achieved through surveillance, risk assessments, antibiotic stewardship in agriculture, public education, research collaborations, rapid diagnostics, and harmonized policies, all aimed at reducing contamination and safeguarding public health effectively., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Council of Research of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran. All stool samples were collected by Hajar Hospital of Shahrekord for routine diagnostic analysis. Prior to isolation and characterization of Arcobacter spp., patient data were de-identified using pseudonymization. Hence, no written informed consent to participate in this study was obtained. Verification of this research project and the licenses related to sampling process were approved by the Prof. Ebrahim Rahimi (Approval Ref Number MIC14008). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflicts of interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF