Search

MLL is a target of chromosomal translocations in acute leukemias with poor prognosis. The common MLL fusion partner AF9 (MLLT3) can directly bind to AF4, DOT1L, BCOR, and CBX8. To delineate the relevance of BCOR and CBX8 binding to MLL-AF9 for leukemogenesis, here we determine protein structures of AF9 complexes with CBX8 and BCOR, and show that binding of all four partners to AF9 is mutually exclusive. Using the structural analyses, we identify point mutations that selectively disrupt AF9 interactions with BCOR and CBX8. In bone marrow stem/progenitor cells expressing point mutant CBX8 or point mutant MLL-AF9, we show that disruption of direct CBX8/MLL-AF9 binding does not impact in vitro cell proliferation, whereas loss of direct BCOR/MLL-AF9 binding causes partial differentiation and increased proliferation. Strikingly, loss of MLL-AF9/BCOR binding abrogated its leukemogenic potential in a mouse model. The MLL-AF9 mutant deficient for BCOR binding reduces the expression of the EYA1 phosphatase and the protein level of c-Myc. Reduction in BCOR binding to MLL-AF9 alters a MYC-driven gene expression program, as well as altering expression of SIX-regulated genes, likely contributing to the observed reduction in the leukemia-initiating cell population. Significance: Direct recruitment of BCOR to MLL-AF9 is essential for leukemia via EYA1 phosphatase regulation, altering MYC and SIX gene expression programs. Specific partner binding (AF4, DOT1L, and BCOR) contributes in distinct ways to MLL leukemia. This may provide a rationale for combination DOT1L and EYA1 inhibition for MLL fusion leukemia treatment. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 127

Transcription factors have traditionally been viewed with skepticism as viable drug targets, but they offer the potential for completely novel mechanisms of action that could more effectively address the stem cell like properties, such as self-renewal and chemo-resistance, that lead to the failure of traditional chemotherapy approaches. Core binding factor is a heterodimeric transcription factor comprised of one of 3 RUNX proteins (RUNX1-3) and a CBFβ binding partner. CBFβ enhances DNA binding of RUNX subunits by relieving auto-inhibition. Both RUNX1 and CBFβ are frequently mutated in human leukemia. More recently, RUNX proteins have been shown to be key players in epithelial cancers, suggesting the targeting of this pathway could have broad utility. In order to test this, we developed small molecules which bind to CBFβ and inhibit its binding to RUNX. Treatment with these inhibitors reduces binding of RUNX1 to target genes, alters the expression of RUNX1 target genes, and impacts cell survival and differentiation. These inhibitors show efficacy against leukemia cells as well as basal-like (triple-negative) breast cancer cells. These inhibitors provide effective tools to probe the utility of targeting RUNX transcription factor function in other cancers.

SummaryThe MLL gene is a common target of chromosomal translocations found in human leukemia. MLL-fusion leukemia has a consistently poor outcome. One of the most common translocation partners is AF9 (MLLT3). MLL-AF9 recruits DOT1L, a histone 3 lysine 79 methyltransferase (H3K79me1/me2/me3), leading to aberrant gene transcription. We show that DOT1L has three AF9 binding sites and present the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) solution structure of a DOT1L-AF9 complex. We generate structure-guided point mutations and find that they have graded effects on recruitment of DOT1L to MLL-AF9. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analyses of H3K79me2 and H3K79me3 show that graded reduction of the DOT1L interaction with MLL-AF9 results in differential loss of H3K79me2 and me3 at MLL-AF9 target genes. Furthermore, the degree of DOT1L recruitment is linked to the level of MLL-AF9 hematopoietic transformation.

Toward drugging the undruggable in cancer Many human cancers are characterized by inappropriate activity of transcription factors. These proteins are attractive drug targets in principle, but normalizing their function requires drugs that modulate specific protein-protein interactions, a goal that has been challenging. In acute myeloid leukemia, a chromosomal translocation creates an aberrant form of the transcription factor CBF-beta, which outcompetes “normal” CBF-beta for binding to another transcription factor called RUNX1, thereby deregulating its activity. Illendula et al. identified and chemically optimized a small molecule that selectively disrupts the interaction between the aberrant CBF-beta and RUNX1 (see the Perspective by Koehler and Chen). This molecule restored normal gene expression patterns and delayed leukemia progression in mice. Thus, transcription factors may not be as undruggable as once thought. Science , this issue p. 779 ; see also p. 713

Acute leukemias caused by translocations of the MLL gene at chromosome 11 band q23 (11q23) are characterized by a unique gene expression profile. More recently, data from several laboratories indicate that the most commonly encountered MLL fusion proteins, MLLT1, MLLT3, and AFF1 are found within a molecular complex that facilitates the elongation phase of mRNA transcription. Mutational analyses suggest that interaction between the MLLT1/3 proteins and AFF family proteins are required for experimental transformation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). Here, we define a specific pairing of two amino acids that creates a salt bridge between MLLT1/3 and AFF proteins that is critically important for MLL-mediated transformation of HPCs. Our findings, coupled with the newly defined structure of MLLT3 in complex with AFF1, should facilitate the development of small molecules that block this amino acid interaction and interfere with the activity of the most common MLL oncoproteins.

The mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) protein is a histone methyltransferase that writes the histone H3 lysine 4 trimethyl (H3K4me3) mark at the promoters of target genes such as HOXA9 and MEIS1. MLL is the target of chromosomal translocations that fuse it in frame to one of over 90 partners, leading to acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias (AML and ALL, respectively) characterized by poor prognoses1. MLL fusions activate transcription by recruiting the AF4 family/ENL family/P-TEFb (AEP) complex and the DOT1L-AF10 family-ENL family complex (DOT1L complex or DotCom). Transcriptional activation via AF4 recruitment and transcriptional maintenance via DOT1L recruitment are required for MLL leukemias. Despite the large number of fusion partners, members of the AEP complex account for nearly 70% of MLL rearrangements1. These fusions constitutively activate MLL targets by bypassing recruitment via ENL (MLLT1) and AF9 (MLLT3) YEATS domain binding to crotonylated or acetylated histone H3. The AF9 ANC1 homology domain (AHD), retained in MLL fusions, is intrinsically disordered, but undergoes coupled folding and binding upon interaction with its binding proteins2. The AHD recruits AF4 and DOT1L, which support transcriptional elongation, as well as the BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) and chromobox homolog 8 (CBX8), which are implicated in transcriptional repression. CBX8 (HPC3) is a mammalian ortholog of Drosophila polycomb that binds trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 and 27 (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3) with variable affinity. Previous reports indicate CBX8 is required for MLL-AF9 and MLL-ENL. BCOR is a transcriptional corepressor that augments BCL6-mediated repression. The BCL6 POZ domain forms a ternary complex with BCOR and SMRT, repressing targets via recruitment of PRC1.1 and HDAC3. BCOR translocations and mutations have been found in a range of cancers. Although it is broadly expressed throughout the hematopoietic system (Bloodspot), little is known about BCOR function in hematopoiesis. Recently, BCOR was shown to have a role in maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency. BCOR has also been implicated in regulation of myeloid cell proliferation and differentiation and is necessary for MLL-AF9 leukemogenesis. While the roles of the direct MLL-AF9/AF4 and MLL-AF9/DOT1L interactions have been the subject of previous structural and functional studies2-4, the roles of the direct interactions of MLL-AF9 with CBX8 and BCOR remain relatively uncharacterized. We determined the structures of the AF9 AHD-CBX8 and AF9 AHD-BCOR complexes. Based on the structures, we developed point mutants to increase and decrease affinity of CBX8 for AF9. Increased affinity decreased colony forming ability and induced differentiation of MLL-AF9-transformed cells, while decreased affinity had no effect. An additional point mutant was developed to selectively disrupt BCOR binding to AF9. In the context of MLL-AF9, this mutant increases proliferative ability without an effect on colony formation and is unable to cause leukemia in vivo. RNAseq analysis reveals that this mutant affects a different set of genes than loss of DOT1L or AF4 binding or gain of CBX8 binding, leading to a phenotype distinct from that seen with perturbation of other AF9 interactions, functionally distinguishing proliferative capacity from in vivo leukemogenesis. In particular, substantial effects were observed on EYA1 expression, suggesting a critical role for the EYA1/SIX gene network in MLL-AF9 leukemia. 1 Meyer, C. et al. The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2017. Leukemia32, 273-284, doi:10.1038/leu.2017.213 (2018). 2 Leach, B. I. et al. Leukemia fusion target AF9 is an intrinsically disordered transcriptional regulator that recruits multiple partners via coupled folding and binding. Structure21, 176-183, doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.11.011 (2013). 3 Kuntimaddi, A. et al. Degree of recruitment of DOT1L to MLL-AF9 defines level of H3K79 Di- and tri-methylation on target genes and transformation potential. Cell reports11, 808-820, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.004 (2015). 4 Lokken, A. A. et al. Importance of a specific amino acid pairing for murine MLL leukemias driven by MLLT1/3 or AFF1/4. Leukemia research38, 1309-1315, doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2014.08.010 (2014). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Transcription factors have traditionally been viewed with skepticism as viable drug targets, but they offer the potential for completely novel mechanisms of action that could more effectively address the stem cell like properties, such as self-renewal and chemo-resistance, that lead to the failure of traditional chemotherapy approaches. Core binding factor is a heterodimeric transcription factor comprised of one of 3 RUNX proteins (RUNX1-3) and a CBFβ binding partner. CBFβ enhances DNA binding of RUNX subunits by relieving auto-inhibition. Both RUNX1 and CBFβ are frequently mutated in human leukemia. More recently, RUNX proteins have been shown to be key players in epithelial cancers, suggesting the targeting of this pathway could have broad utility. In order to test this, we developed small molecules which bind to CBFβ and inhibit its binding to RUNX. Treatment with these inhibitors reduces binding of RUNX1 to target genes, alters the expression of RUNX1 target genes, and impacts cell survival and differentiation. These inhibitors show efficacy against leukemia cells as well as basal-like (triple-negative) breast cancer cells. These inhibitors provide effective tools to probe the utility of targeting RUNX transcription factor function in other cancers., Graphical Abstract Image 10, Highlights • Small molecule inhibitors of CBFβ-RUNX protein-protein interaction developed. • Inhibitors alter occupancy of RUNX1 on target genes and alter their expression. • Inhibitors show efficacy against leukemia cell lines and basal-like (triple negative) breast cancer cell lines. Transcription factors are proteins that bind to DNA and regulate how much of other proteins are made. We describe the development of inhibitors of the interaction between two transcription factors, CBFβ and RUNX. Both these transcription factors are the targets of alterations in human leukemia as well as in a number of solid tumors. The inhibitor changes the behavior of the RUNX transcription factor and alters the levels of proteins it regulates. We show these inhibitors may have potential utility for leukemia as well as one specific type of breast cancer which has a very poor prognosis.

The MLL CXXC domain binds nonmethylated CpG-containing DNA and is essential for the oncogenic properties of MLL fusion proteins. To determine potential functional promiscuity of similar DNA binding domains, we replaced the MLL CXXC domain in the context of the leukemogenic MLL-AF9 fusion with CXXC domains from DNMT1, CGBP (CFP1), and MBD1, or with a methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) from MBD1. MLL(DNMT1 CXXC)-AF9 shows robust in vitro colony forming activity and in vivo leukemogenesis, similar to MLL-AF9. However, colony forming ability and leukemogenicity are abrogated in MLL-AF9 containing either the CGBP or MBD1 CXXC domains or the MBD1 MBD domain. Direct comparison of in vitro DNA binding affinity of the isolated CXXC or MBD domains demonstrated that MLL, DNMT1, and CGBP CXXC domains could each bind to unmethylated DNA but with differing affinity. In contrast, the isolated MBD1 CXXC and MBD1 MBD domains were unable to bind to the same DNA. However, all substituted domains still allowed targeting of the MLL fusions to the functionally important Hoxa9 locus in primary bone marrow progenitor cells. In addition to DNA binding activity, it was critical that specific CpG residues in the Hoxa9 locus were protected from methylation for leukemia development. This ultimately prevented histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) of the locus and enabled Hoxa9 expression. These were properties shared by MLL and DNMT1 CXXC domains but not by CGBP CXXC or the other swapped fusions tested. We demonstrate that similar CXXC domains can be mechanistically distinguished by specificity of CpG nucleotides preferentially protected from DNA methylation. Background: The non-methyl-CpG DNA-binding CXXC domain is critical for MLL leukemia. Results: Only the DNMT1 CXXC domain substitutes in an MLL leukemia model because of similar capacity to protect from CpG DNA methylation and H3K9 methylation. Conclusion: Differential protection from specific CpG DNA methylation mechanistically distinguishes similar CXXC domains. Significance: CXXC domains have specific nonredundant activities that impact downstream regulatory functions.

Dendrite development is critical in the formation of functional neural networks. Recent studies have provided insights into the involvement of secretory transport in dendritogenesis, raising the question of how the secretory pathway may be under regulation to direct dendritic elaboration. Here, we identify a functional link between transcriptional regulatory programs and the COPII secretory machinery in driving dendrite morphogenesis in Drosophila dendritic arborization (da) sensory neurons. MARCM analyses and gain-of-function studies reveal cell-autonomous requirements for the COPII coat protein Sec31 in mediating da neuron dendritic homeostasis. We demonstrate that the homeodomain protein Cut transcriptionally regulates Sec31 in addition to other components of COPII secretory transport to promote dendrite elaboration, accompanied by increased satellite secretory endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi outposts primarily localized at dendritic branch points. We further establish a novel functional role for the transcription factor CrebA in regulating dendrite development and show that Cut initiates a gene expression cascade via CrebA that coordinately affects the COPII machinery to mediate dendritic morphology.

Mixed lineage leukemias are characterized by the creation of a chimeric fusion protein where MLL is fused in frame to over 60 different fusion partners, leading to the disruption of HOX gene regulation. AF9 is one of the most common MLL fusion partners, and MLL-AF9 leukemia is acute and aggressive with a poor overall prognosis. The mechanism by which AF9 regulates normal transcription and contributes to dysregulated transcription is poorly understood. We have shown that the C-terminal domain of AF9 binds to four different proteins, two of which (Dot1L – an H3K79 methyltransferase and AF4 – which recruits P-TEFb), are transcriptional activators, whereas the other two (CBX8 – which is a part of the PRC1 repressive complex and BCOR- BCL6 corepressor), are generally transcriptional repressors, suggesting that AF9 acts as a protein signaling hub. We have previously shown that the C-terminal domain of AF9 is an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) meaning that it is unstructured on its own but undergoes coupled folding and binding upon interacting with its binding partners1. Our goal is to use structure-function studies to further understand AF9 protein interactions and to elucidate which of these interactions with AF9 are critical for MLL-AF9 leukemogenesis. We have determined NMR solution structures of complexes of Dot1L and CBX8 with AF9. Both Dot1L and CBX8 complexes form mixed alpha-beta structures, similar to that of our previously solved AF4-AF9 complex structure where AF4, Dot1L, and CBX8 all have a consensus LXVXIXL sequence and form a ß-strand and an extended ß-turn. Intriguingly, Dot1L contains three separate binding motifs for AF9 interaction, including one repeat motif separated by seven amino acids. Our 15N-1H HSQC NMR experiments show that each of these three binding sites on Dot1L adopts a similar fold with AF9 yet has vastly different binding affinities with AF9. We have created several structure-guided mutations on AF9 that differentially block interactions of its binding partners. A single charge reversal mutation on AF9 that blocks all protein interactions with AF9 was introduced into MLL-AF9 in vitro colony forming assays, and was able to abrogate the serial replating capacity of MLL-AF9. Other mutations that selectively block the interaction of various proteins with AF9, show differential effects in colony forming assays and HOX gene expression suggesting the importance of certain AF9 protein interactions in MLL-AF9 leukemogenesis. 1. Leach, B. I. et al. Leukemia fusion target AF9 is an intrinsically disordered transcriptional regulator that recruits multiple partners via coupled folding and binding. Structure21, 176-183, doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.11.011 (2013). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 4193 The MLL gene encodes a multi-domain protein that is involved in the maintenance of Hox gene expression during development and hematopoiesis, and was first identified through its involvement in chromosome translocations that cause leukemia. The CXXC domain of MLL, which is retained in leukemic MLL fusion proteins, is a cysteine rich DNA binding domain, with specificity for binding nonmethylated CpG-containing DNA, and is essential for MLL fusion proteins' oncogenic properties. We performed domain swap experiments in which CXXC domains from other proteins were swapped in to replace MLL's CXXC domain in the context of an oncogenic MLL fusion. CXXC domains from DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), CpG binding protein (CGBP), and methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1 (MBD1), as well as a methyl binding domain (MBD) from MBD1 were swapped into the MLL-AF9 fusion. These particular domains were chosen because their described CpG DNA binding capacity is either similar or different from that described for MLL. In vitro colony assays on isolated murine bone marrow progenitor cells infected with domain swapped or wild type MLL-AF9 fusion genes were performed in order to determine whether CpG binding domains from other proteins would affect the ability of MLL-AF9 to give an enhanced proliferative capacity to bone marrow progenitor cells. In vivo murine studies determined whether the different CpG binding domains alter the ability of MLL fusion proteins to cause leukemia. We predicted that the different CpG binding domains would change the strength or specificity of MLL binding to DNA, which would affect the ability of MLL-AF9 to cause leukemia. The results of both in vitro replating assays and in vivo leukemogenesis experiments have shown significant differences between the ability of various CpG DNA binding domains to function in the context of an MLL-AF9 fusion protein. MLL-AF9 containing the DNMT1 CXXC domain shows robust in vitro colony forming activity and in vivo leukemogenesis activity, similar to the oncogenic MLL-AF9 fusion. However, MLL-AF9 containing either the CXXC domain from CGBP or MBD1, or the MBD domain of MBD1 all show reduced colony forming ability and leukemogenicity in vivo. In vitro DNA binding experiments are currently being performed to directly measure and compare the DNA binding affinity of the CXXC domain from MLL to the other domain swap proteins. Preliminary data suggests that MLL CXXC has a stronger DNA binding affinity to non-methylated DNA compared to the other CXXC domains. Furthermore, the DNMT and CGBP CXXC domains both show lower affinity DNA binding compared to MLL CXXC, but they have different effects in MLL-AF9. This suggests that CXXC domain properties in addition to DNA binding affinity, perhaps including protein recruitment, also contribute to an MLL fusion protein's leukemogenic properties. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

SummaryMixed lineage leukemia (MLL) fusion proteins cause oncogenic transformation of hematopoietic cells by constitutive recruitment of elongation factors to HOX promoters, resulting in overexpression of target genes. The structural basis of transactivation by MLL fusion partners remains undetermined. We show that the ANC1 homology domain (AHD) of AF9, one of the most common MLL translocation partners, is intrinsically disordered and recruits multiple transcription factors through coupled folding and binding. We determined the structure of the AF9 AHD in complex with the elongation factor AF4 and show that aliphatic residues, which are conserved in each of the AF9 binding partners, form an integral part of the hydrophobic core of the complex. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements show that AF9 retains significant dynamic behavior which may facilitate exchange between disordered partners. We propose that AF9 functions as a signaling hub that regulates transcription through dynamic recruitment of cofactors in normal hematopoiesis and in acute leukemia.