Search

Background and Objectives: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a common pathology in elderly patients that usually presents as heart failure (HF). However, it is not clear whether CA associated with HF has a worse prognosis compared with HF due to other etiologies., Material and Methods: Prospective, observational cohort study that recruited patients ≥65 years of age with HF in 30 Spanish centers. The cohort was divided according to whether the patients had AC or not. Patients were followed for 1 year., Results: A total of 484 patients were included in the analysis. The population was elderly (median 86 years) and 49% were women CA was present in 23.8 % of the included patients. In the CA group, there was a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and valvular disease. At one year of follow-up, mortality was significantly more frequent in patients with CA compared to those without (33.0 vs.14.9%, p < 0.001). However, there were no differences between both groups in visits to the emergency room or readmissions. In the multivariate analysis, the variables that were shown to predict all-cause mortality at one year of follow-up were chronic kidney disease (HR 1.75 (1.01-3.05) p 0.045), NT-proBNP levels (HR 2.51 (1.46-4.30) p < 0.001), confusion (HR 2.05 (1.01-4.17), p 0.048), and the presence of CA (HR 1.77 (1.11-2.84), p 0.017)., Conclusion: The presence of CA in elderly patients with HF is related to a worse prognosis at one year of follow-up. Early diagnosis of the pathology and multidisciplinary management can help improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.)

Aim: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are one of the most used drugs to control symptoms in patients with acute heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on its safety is inconclusive. The objective was to describe the characteristics of patients admitted for HF and treated with BZDs and to assess the relationship of this treatment and mortality., Patients and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, multicentre (74 Spanish hospitals), cohort study. Patients admitted for HF were divided depending on whether they were treated with BZDs or not. Propensity score analysis matched patients in both groups in a 1:1 manner according to different factors. The primary outcome was mortality at day 7. Secondary outcomes were mortality at days 30 and 180, as well as readmissions and emergency room visits at 180 days., Results: We included 1855 patients: 639 (34.4%) had prescribed BZDs treatment versus 1216 (65.6%) who had not been treated. Patients receiving BZDs had advanced heart disease, severe symptoms, need more HF intensive treatment and higher mortality. After propensity matching 381 balanced paired cases were included in each group. Treatment with BZDs was not associated with greater risk of mortality at day 7 of index hospitalization (7.6% vs 5.2%, adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.83-2.68, p = 0.186). There were also no differences between groups in terms of mortality at day 30 and 180, readmissions or visits to the emergency room., Conclusions: Our data support that benzodiazepines could be safely used for improving symptoms. in patients admitted for acute HF in terms of short-medium term mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) could be a common cause of heart failure (HF). The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of CA in patients with HF., Methods: Observational, prospective, and multicenter study involving 30 Spanish hospitals. A total of 453 patients ≥ 65 years with HF and an interventricular septum or posterior wall thickness > 12 mm were included. All patients underwent a 99m Tc-DPD/PYP/HMDP scintigraphy and monoclonal bands were studied, following the current criteria for non-invasive diagnosis. In inconclusive cases, biopsies were performed., Results: The vast majority of CA were diagnosed non-invasively. The prevalence was 20.1%. Most of the CA were transthyretin (ATTR-CM, 84.6%), with a minority of cardiac light-chain amyloidosis (AL-CM, 2.2%). The remaining (13.2%) was untyped. The prevalence was significantly higher in men (60.1% vs 39.9%, p = 0.019). Of the patients with CA, 26.5% had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%., Conclusions: CA was the cause of HF in one out of five patients and should be screened in the elderly with HF and myocardial thickening, regardless of sex and LVEF. Few transthyretin-gene-sequencing studies were performed in older patients. In many patients, it was not possible to determine the amyloid subtype.

Introduction: There are few data in the Spanish population about the causes of death in patients admitted to internal medicine departments for heart failure. Their study according to left ventricular ejection fraction (reduced: rEF, mid-range: mEF, and preserved: pEF) could improve the knowledge of patients and their prognosis., Methods: Prospective multicentre cohort study of 4144 patients admitted with heart failure to internal medicine departments. Their clinical characteristics, mortality rate and causes were classified according to pEF (≥ 50%), mEF (40%-49%) and rEF (<40%). Patients were followed-up for a median of one year., Results: There were 1198 deaths (29%). The cause of death was cardiovascular (CV) in 833 patients (69.5%), mainly heart failure (50%) and sudden cardiac death (7.5%). Non-cardiovascular (NoCV) causes were responsible for 365 deaths (30.5%). The most common NoCV causes were infections (13%). The most frequent and early cause in all groups was heart failure. Patients with pEF, compared to the other groups, had lower risk of sudden cardiac death and higher risk of infections (P <.05). The causes of death in patients with mrEF were closer to those with pEF., Conclusions: The causes of death in patients with heart failure were different depending on ejection fraction strata. Patients with mEF and pEF, due to their high comorbidity and higher frequency of NoCV death, would require comprehensive management by internal medicine., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Modes of death in patients with heart failure (HF) have been well characterized in randomized studies, but data from real-life are scarce, especially in the elderly, women and in HF with mid-range or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Our purpose was to examine modes of death in HF patients according to age, sex and LVEF. We analysed the mode of death of HF patients from two prospective multicentre contemporary Spanish registries conducted by cardiologists (REDINSCOR, n = 2150) and by internists (RICA, n = 1396). Mode of death was pre-specified. Out of 3546 patients, 485 (13.7%) died during the 9-month follow-up. Cardiovascular (CV) causes were the most frequent, regardless of the age, sex and LVEF. More than half of patients died due to worsening HF in both groups of patients, followed by other non-CV causes in those attended by internists, and sudden cardiac death in those cared by cardiologists. Stroke was more common among elderly patients, women and HF with preserved LVEF. Non-CV causes, particularly infectious diseases, accounted for a remarkable proportion of deaths, especially in the elderly and in HF patients with preserved LVEF. Functional class, age and anaemia had a strong influence on both CV and non-CV death. CV death due to refractory HF was the most prevalent among our population, irrespective of age, sex or LVEF. However, a significant proportion of HF patients died from non-CV causes, particularly elderly with mid-range and preserved LVEF. These patients could benefit significantly from a multidisciplinary follow-up.

Introduction and Aim: Palliative care in patients with advanced heart failure is strongly recommended by Clinical Practice Guidelines. We aimed to calculate the prevalence of advanced heart failure in admitted patients, to describe their management, and to analyse the factors that influence their referral to specialised palliative care., Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional, multicentre study that consecutively included patients admitted for heart failure in 74 Spanish hospitals. If they met criteria for advanced heart failure, their treatment, complications and procedures were recorded., Results: A total of 3153 patients were included. Of them, 739 (23%) met criteria for advanced heart failure. They were more likely to be women, older and to have a history of anaemia, chronic kidney disease and cognitive impairment. For their management, furosemide infusions (30%) and vasodilators (21%) were used. Refractory symptoms were treated with opioids (47%) and benzodiazepines (44%). Palliative care was only provided in the last hours of life in 48% of them. A multidisciplinary approach, involving palliative care specialists was sought in 15% of these patients. Treatment with furosemide infusions, an advanced New York Heart Association functional class, to meet advanced HF criteria and the presence of cancer were associated with the referral to specialised palliative care., Conclusions: Almost one in four patients admitted with HF met criteria of advanced disease. They were older and had more comorbidities. Specialist palliative care services were involved in only a minority of patients, mainly those who were highly symptomatic or had cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To improve the knowledge on characteristics, treatment and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) and mid-range ejection fraction discharged after an acute HF episode., Methods: We prospectively included and followed 2753 patients admitted with HF to Internal Medicine units. Patients were classified according to ejection fraction (EF) into three strata: reduced, EF <40% (HFrEF); mid-range EF 40-49% (HFmrEF); and preserved EF ≥50% (HFpEF). Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory data and treatment at discharge were recorded and the groups were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the association of EF with outcomes in these three groups., Results: A total of 10.2% of patients had HFmrEF. They were more likely to be men and to have a history of chronic kidney disease and higher levels of NT-proBNP than those with HFpEF. Compared to patients with HFrEF, these patients had less frequently ischaemic aetiology and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a higher proportion of atrial fibrillation and hypertension. In HFmrEF, the use of beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and antiplatelet drugs was lower than in HFrEF, but the use of calcium channel blockers and anticoagulants was higher. There were no differences between groups in 30-day and 1-year readmission rates. However, patients with HFrEF had significantly higher 1-year mortality (28%) than patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF (20% and 22%, p<0.001)., Conclusions: Clinical characteristics and treatment among patients with HF differ depending on EF strata. Prognosis of patients with HFmrEF is closer to that of HFpEF, being medium term survival better than in HFrEF., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: The specialty treating patients with heart failure (HF) has a prognostic impact in the hospital setting but this issue remains under debate in the ambulatory environment. We aimed to compare the clinical profile and outcomes of outpatients with HF treated by cardiologists or internists., Methods: We analyzed the clinical, electrocardiogram, laboratory, and echocardiographic data of 2 prospective multicenter Spanish cohorts of outpatients with HF treated by cardiologists (REDINSCOR, n=2150) or by internists (RICA, n=1396). Propensity score matching analysis was used to test the influence of physician specialty on outcome., Results: Cardiologist-treated patients were often men, were younger, and had ischemic etiology and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients followed up by internists were predominantly women, were older, and a higher percentage had preserved LVEF and associated comorbidities. The 9-month mortality was lower in the REDINSCOR cohort (11.6% vs 16.9%; P<.001), but the 9-month HF-readmission rates were similar (15.7% vs 16.9%; P=.349). The propensity matching analysis selected 558 pairs of comparable patients and continued to show significantly lower 9-month mortality in the cardiology cohort (12.0% vs 18.8%; RR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.48-0.85; P=.002), with no relevant differences in the 9-month HF-readmission rate (18.1% vs 17.2%; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.74-1.22; P=.695)., Conclusions: Age, sex, LVEF and comorbidities were major determinants of specialty-related referral in HF outpatients. An in-depth propensity matched analysis showed significantly lower 9-month mortality in the cardiologist cohort., (Copyright © 2016 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate precipitating factors (PF) of exacerbation in heart failure (HF) and their relationship with age, preserved vs. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and short-term prognosis., Methods: We included and followed 2962 patients admitted with acute HF to Internal Medicine Units. Several PF were identified. Differences in PF according to preserved vs. reduced LVEF and age (patients≥80years vs. younger) were analyzed. Primary endpoints were readmission due to worsening HF and all-cause mortality at 3months follow-up. Multivariable Cox models were conducted to identify the independent predictors of 3-months mortality and readmission., Results: More than half of the patients were 80years and over, 47% were women and 61% had preserved LVEF. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial ischemia were the more common cause of decompensation among octogenarians. It was more frequent to find myocardial ischemia or non-adherence to treatment as precipitants in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, respiratory infections, AF and poor control of blood pressure were more usual in patients with preserved LVEF compared to those with LVEF <50%. Patients admitted for HF precipitated by myocardial ischemia had a higher risk of readmission at 3months (HR 1.49; CI 95%: 1.12-1.99, p=0.006) and the longest hospital stay (12days). PF showed no predictive value for mortality., Conclusion: Myocardial ischemia as a PF was an independent marker for HF readmissions at 3-months follow-up. Precipitants are different depending on the age and LVEF of patients. Their identification could improve risk stratification and prevention strategies., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether osteoprotegerin - an emerging inflammatory biomarker in cardiovascular diseases - predicts outcomes in patients with acute heart failure and preserved ejection fraction., Methods: We measured urea, creatinine, hemoglobin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and osteoprotegerin on admission in 177 patients admitted with decompensated heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction at least 45%. The population was divided according to the median values of osteoprotegerin (158.6 ng/l). Primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and death/readmission at 1-year follow-up, respectively. Multivariable Cox models were generated for osteoprotegerin and common risk factors. We also evaluated the reclassification of patients into risk categories after adding this biomarker to the model., Results: A total of 43 patients died during the follow-up and 84 had a combined event. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly increased primary and secondary endpoints according to the median of osteoprotegerin (log-rank, P < 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). After adjustment for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, BMI and New York Heart Association III-IV, osteoprotegerin was a significant predictor of primary endpoint evaluated as continuous and categorized variable (relative risk 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.18-5.24, P = 0.016 and relative risk 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.96, P = 0.025, respectively). The clinical prediction model with osteoprotegerin evaluated with Net Reclassification Index was not significant., Conclusion: Osteoprotegerin is independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, adding this biomarker into a risk model does not improve its prediction value.