Search

Protein-protein interactions play important roles in regulating human aquaporins (AQP) by gating as well as trafficking. While structural and functional studies have provided detailed knowledge of AQP transport mechanisms, selectivity as well as gating by conformational changes of loops or termini, the mechanism behind how protein-protein interactions control AQP-mediated water transport through cellular membranes remains poorly characterized. Here we explore the interaction between two human AQPs and regulatory proteins: the interaction between AQP0 and calmodulin, which mediates AQP0 gating, as well as the interaction between AQP2 and LIP5, which is involved in trafficking. Using microscale thermophoresis (MST) and fluorescence anisotropy, two methods that have the advantage of low sample consumption and detergent compatibility, we show that the interactions can be studied using both full-length AQPs and AQP peptides corresponding to the regulatory protein binding sites. However, full-length AQPs gave better reproducibility between methods and for the first time revealed that AQP0 binds CaM in a cooperative manner, which was not seen in experiments using peptides. Our study highlights that, while peptides are great tools for locating binding sites and pinpointing interacting residues, full-length proteins may give additional insights, such as binding mechanism, allostery and cooperativity, important parameters for understanding protein-protein mediated regulation in the cellular context. Our work provides a platform for further studies of AQP regulation that may be of interest for designing drugs that target AQP complexes as well as the development of artificial bio-mimetic water channels for water-purification purposes.

Urinary microvesicles, such as 40-100 nm exosomes and 100-1000 nm microparticles, contain many proteins that may serve as biomarkers of renal disease. Microvesicles have been isolated by ultracentrifugation or nanomembrane ultrafiltration from normal urine; however, little is known about the efficiency of these methods in isolating microvesicles from patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Here we compared three techniques to isolate microvesicles from nephrotic urine: nanomembrane ultrafiltration, ultracentrifugation, and ultracentrifugation followed by size-exclusion chromatography (UC-SEC). Highly abundant urinary proteins were still present in sufficient quantity after ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation to blunt detection of less abundant microvesicular proteins by MALDI-TOF-TOF mass spectrometry. The microvesicular markers neprilysin, aquaporin-2, and podocalyxin were highly enriched following UC-SEC compared with preparations by ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation alone. Electron microscopy of the UC-SEC fractions found microvesicles of varying size, compatible with the presence of both exosomes and microparticles. Thus, UC-SEC following ultracentrifugation to further enrich and purify microparticles facilitates the search for prognostic biomarkers that might be used to predict the clinical course of nephrotic syndrome.