Search

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of root canal irrigants on the accuracy of Dentaport ZX™® electronic apex locator (EAL) in enlarged root canals. Our previous study revealed that as the diameter of the root canal increased, the electronically measured length with small size files became shorter in the presence of blood. It is not known whether different canal irrigants would interfere with the reading accuracy of an EAL in enlarged root canals. Methods: A total of 45 extracted single-rooted human teeth were used. In Stage 1, canals were instrumented using #10–40 K-files with a #40 K-file as the master apical file (MAF). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups and mounted in an experimental apparatus. The following irrigants were used during electronic canal measurements: Group A = 0.5% NaOCl; Group B = 2.5% NaOCl; Group C = 15% EDTA; Group D = 0.8% chlorhexidine (CHX); and Group E = RC Prep. In Stage 2, the canals were enlarged using a #60 K-file as the MAF. In Stages 1 and 2, the apical portion of the canals was instrumented using the step-back sequence (up to a #80 K-file). In Stage 3, the canals were enlarged again using a #80 K-file as the MAF. In each stage, the canal length was measured with a Dentaport ZX™® using #10 and #40, #10 and #60, and #10 and #80 K-files for Stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test. Results: Statistical analysis showed significant differences among all groups (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between Group A and B at each stage and between Group D and E at Stage 2. A statistical significant difference was observed between #10 K-file and other files (#40, #60 and #80) at each stage (p < 0.01). In Groups A and B, there was no significant difference between #10 and 40 K-files (Stage 1) and between #10 and #60 K- files (Stage 2). Conclusion: The Dentaport ZX™® was accurate and not adversely affected by the presence of 0.5% or 2.5% NaOCl and EDTA in the enlarged canals, and the measured lengths obtained with small and large size files were comparable. However, it was accurate in the presence of CHX and RC Prep only when large size files were used, and the length measured with small size files was greater than the actual length.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare three nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments: EndoWave, K3 and ProFile, with respect to their debris retention and wear. Thirty simulated root canal models made from resin blocks with 40 degrees canal curvature were used. They were divided into three groups of 10 samples each; EndoWave, K3 and ProFile were used in Groups A, B and C respectively. They were prepared with four serial size files. The weight of each file was measured to evaluate debris retention and wear at four representative time points: prior to root canal preparation (W1), immediately after root canal preparation (W2), after ultrasonic cleaning (W3), after further additional cleaning (W4). The weight of debris on each file after root canal instrumentation and ultrasonic cleaning was calculated as D1: (W2 - W4) and D2: (W3 - W4) respectively. Also, wear of the file was calculated as WF: (W1 - W4). There was a significant difference in the amount of debris remaining on the file among the three files; EndoWave retained more debris (D1) than K3 and ProFile (P < 0.001, one-way anova). ProFile had the largest amount of debris (D2) remaining after ultrasonic cleaning (P < 0.001). Wear was not detectable in this study. Under the conditions of this study, immediately after root canal preparation, EndoWave retained the largest amount of debris, while ProFile retained the most debris even after ultrasonic cleaning.

Background: The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the accuracy of four electronic apex locators (EALs) to determine the working length in teeth with various foramen diameters. Our previous study revealed that electronically measured canal length was influenced by the root canal diameter. It is not known whether foramen size would interfere with the reading accuracy of an EAL. Methods: A total of 36 extracted human lower single rooted premolar teeth were divided into four groups of nine teeth each. In groups A, B and C, the root canals were instrumented using #10–80, #10–100 and #10–120 K-files, and the tip of size #80, #100 and #120 K-files were permitted to pass through the apical foramen to a length of 1mm, respectively. In group D, the teeth were instrumented using #10–140 K-files and the tip of #140 K-file was permitted to pass through the apical foramen to a length of 5mm. Thus, the average apical foramen diameters in groups A, B, C and D were approximately 0.82mm, 1.02mm, 1.22mm and 1.5mm, respectively. The teeth were then mounted in 1% agar and four EALs were used: Root ZX, Foramatron D10, Apex NRG and Apit 7. For electronic measurement, sizes #10 and #80, #10 and #100, #10 and #120, and #10 and #140 K-files were used for groups A, B, C and D, respectively. During electronic measurement the canals were flushed with 6% sodium hypochlorite solution. Results: Three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test showed that EAL, file size and foramen size all had a significant influence on the measurement error (P

Background: The initial electronic apex locator (EAL) length measurement is generally established with a small-sized file. It is not known whether file size would be interfering with the reading accuracy of the EAL. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of file size on the accuracy of Root ZX apex locator using an agar model when sodium hypochlorite solution or blood was present during electronic measurements in enlarged root canals. Methods: A total of 36 extracted lower premolars were used. In stage 1, the canals were instrumented using size 10–40 K-files with a size 40 K-file as the master apical file (MAF). The teeth were then divided randomly into two groups of 18 teeth each. In group A, the teeth were mounted in one per cent agar and irrigated with six per cent sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl), while in group B the teeth were mounted in agar and irrigated with human blood. In stage 2, the canals were enlarged using a size 60 K-file as the MAF. In stages 1 and 2, the apical portions of the canals were instrumented using the step-back sequence (up to a size 80 K-file). In stage 3, the canals were enlarged using a size 80 K-file as the MAF. In each stage, the length was measured with a Root ZX until the meter value reached ‘APEX’ using small and large size files. Results: Three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test showed that file size, stage of preparation and type of irrigant all had a significant influence on the measurement error (P < 0.0001), with all the interactions between these three factors being significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: As the diameter of the root canal increased, the measured length with the smaller size files became shorter. A file of a size close to the prepared canal diameter should be used for root length measurement in the presence of blood. In the presence of NaOCl, the Root ZX was highly accurate even when the file was much smaller than the diameter of the canal. The agar model was effective and suitable for testing EALs in vitro.