Search

Objectives: Acute repetitive seizures (ARSs) are one of the few commonly encountered neurological emergencies in children. There is a need for an appropriate timeline-based treatment protocol, which will be shown to be safe and efficacious in a clinical study. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective chart review to determine the efficacy of a pre-specified treatment protocol for the management of ARSs in children aged 1–18 years. The treatment protocol was specifically applied in children with a diagnosis of epilepsy and not critically ill, who met the criteria for ARSs, with the exemption of new onset of ARSs. The first tier of treatment protocol focused on intravenous lorazepam, optimization of dose of existing anti-seizure medications (ASMs), and control of triggers like acute febrile illness, while second-tier focused on adding one or two additional ASMs, commonly used in cases with seizure clusters or status epilepticus. Results: We included the first 100 consecutive patients (7.6 ± 3.2 years, 63% boys). Our treatment protocol was successful in 89 patients (58 and 31 required first-tier and second-tier treatment). The absence of pre-existing drug-resistant epilepsy and the presence of acute febrile illness as a triggering factor (P = 0.02 and 0.03) were associated with the success of the first tier of the treatment protocol. Excessive sedation (n = 29), incoordination (n = 14), transient gait instability (n = 11), and excessive irritability (n = 5) were the most common adverse effects observed during the initial 1 week. Conclusion: This pre-specified treatment protocol is safe and efficacious in controlling ARSs in cases with established epilepsy who are not critically sick. External validation from other parts of the world/centers and a more diverse epilepsy population are required before generalizing the protocol into clinical practice.

The clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) is a recently developed and validated scale to rate the severity of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in adults. But it is yet to be validated in pediatric AE cases.In a prospective observational study, we determined the validity and prognostic utility of CASE in the pediatric population with a diagnosis of probable or definite AE. We also determined clinical, neuroimaging, or laboratory-based prognostic factors for favorable clinical outcomes at 3 months after presentation. We used weighted kappa statistics and the intra-class correlation coefficient of individual item scores and total scores for determining inter-observer and intra-observer reliability respectively.We enrolled a total of 54 patients (28 girls, probable [45%] or definite [55%] AE). Functional status score (FSS), CASE score, and other scores showed significant improvement at the time of discharge and 3-months, as compared to baseline (p 0.0001). The intra-observer and interobserver reliability of the total scores was excellent (k = 0.94 and 0.95 respectively). CASE was also found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach-α = 0.83). The corrected item-total correlations of all items were0.40. The correlation between the total CASE score and FSS score at admission, at discharge, and at 3 months was strong (r = 0.90, 0.92, and 0.94, p 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only seropositivity or definite AE and CASE score at baseline was found to be significant predictive factors for functional status at 3 months (p = 0.03, 0.01).CASE score can be used for monitoring the severity of pediatric AE patients. It also has prognostic usefulness for predicting functional independence on follow-up.

Background: In critically ill children, sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) has significant morbidity and mortality. Aim: To estimate whether early initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD)...