Search

Purpose: Practice patterns of same-day discharge for pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis are not well-analyzed. Our aim is to evaluate current practice patterns and outcomes of same-day discharge for these patients., Methods: NSQIP-P retrospective registry identified patients (2017-2021) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis. Annual same-day discharge (SDD) rate was determined. SDD patients were compared to those discharged postoperative days 1-2 (non-SDD). Sub-group analysis was performed on ICD-10 code K35.30. Regression was performed., Results: Overall, 67,214 patients were identified. The SDD rate increased from 33.3% (2017) to 52.5% (2021) with decreased 30-day readmissions between SDD and non-SDD (1.3% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001). Sub-group analysis identified 7,330 patients with SDD rates from 50.7% (2019) to 60.4% (2021) with decreased 30-day readmissions (1.3% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001) for SDD versus non-SDD. No increase in adverse events for SDD occurred in either analysis. Regression identified esophageal/gastric/intestinal diseases increased odds of early readmission or reoperation (OR 1.85, p = 0.042)., Conclusion: Same-day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis continues to increase in frequency without a significant increase in adverse outcomes. SDD rates are 20-30% lower than previously published single-center studies, indicating there is a likely a larger percentage of patients that could discharge same-day., Level of Evidence (i-V): Level III., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Complicated appendicitis, considered a marker of delay in accessing surgical care among children, has been inconsistently associated with race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, rurality, and distance to care. This statewide assessment measured factors associated with complicated appendicitis while overcoming limitations of prior work, namely, selection bias and use of inexact socioeconomic status measures., Methods: Children (<18 years) undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis in Wisconsin from 2018 to 2021 were identified in the Wisconsin Hospital Association database. Patient residence and hospital locations were used to determine rurality, travel distances, and socioeconomic status as measured by Area Deprivation Index, Child Opportunity Index, Community Need Index, and county-level poverty rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with complicated appendicitis., Results: Among 5,881 children undergoing appendectomy, 1,375 (23.4%) had complicated appendicitis. Adjusting for other variables, complicated appendicitis was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio 0.90 per year increase); Hispanic White race/ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio 1.40-1.63); distance to the hospital where surgery was performed (adjusted odds ratio 1.16-1.17 per 10-mile increase); and very low Child Opportunity Index (adjusted odds ratio 1.29), Community Need Index (adjusted odds ratio 1.20 per 1-score increase), and county-level poverty (adjusted odds ratio 1.02 per 1% increase). Insurance type, rurality, and Area Deprivation Index were not associated with complicated appendicitis. Residential county-level complicated appendicitis rates (0.0%-50.0%) had moderate correlation to pediatric county-level poverty rates (r s =0.43)., Conclusion: Complicated appendicitis was associated with Child Opportunity Index, Community Need Index, and county-level poverty but not insurance type, rurality, or Area Deprivation Index. There was geographic variability in complicated appendicitis rates, with modest correlation to county-level poverty. Targeted interventions among Hispanic populations and those with travel- and socioeconomic status-related barriers to care may be beneficial in preventing complicated appendicitis among children., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest/Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common presenting symptom in surgical patients, with a wide range of differentials, particularly in premenopausal females. This study explores ultrasound usage in the management of women aged 16-55 years presenting with RIF pain., Methods: A total of 1,082 patients who presented to a tertiary hospital over 12 months were included. Data were collected from patients' electronic records, including initial clinical impression, imaging, management, operative findings, histology and subsequent hospital attendances within 6 weeks and within 6 months., Results: Following clinical assessment, 607 (56%) of patients underwent an ultrasound. Of these, 280 (25.9%) patients received no radiological imaging on initial presentation, and 252 (42%) had pathology identified on ultrasound. The most common finding was an ovarian cyst, closely followed by unexplained free pelvic fluid. Of the 607 patients scanned, 29 (4.8%) had an ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis; 254 of 1,082 (23.5%) patients underwent operative management. Of the 254 patients who had surgery, 179 (70.5%) had preoperative imaging. Of the 29 (11.4%) cases where the intraoperative finding was gynaecological, 15 (51.7%) cases had not had any preoperative imaging. The negative appendicectomy rate was 21.3% (45/211). Of the 45 patients who had a histologically normal appendix, 22 (48.9%) had not had any previous imaging. Ultrasound had a specificity of 78% for diagnosing appendicitis., Conclusions: In patients who underwent operative management, a negative finding or finding not requiring surgical management was associated with no preoperative imaging. This supports the use of ultrasound scans as an adjunct in a multimodal approach to the assessment of women presenting with RIF pain.

Background: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency with diverse clinical presentations, making its diagnosis challenging. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the standard treatment, with various methods for appendiceal stump closure, including polymeric clips and endoloops. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of polymeric clips compared with endoloops in laparoscopic appendectomy., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted followingPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Embase were searched for studies up to March 25, 2024., Results: In total, 13 studies, including 6 randomized controlled trials, were analyzed. Polymeric clipping demonstrated significantly shorter surgical time compared with the endoloop (standardized mean difference 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.53, P < .00001), with no difference in hospital stay or overall complications. However, the endoloop was associated with a greater incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (risk ratio 3.53, 95% confidence interval 1.56-8.00, P = .003). Other outcomes, including time from instrument application to appendiceal cutting, ileus, and surgical-site infection, showed no significant differences between the 2 techniques., Conclusion: Polymeric clipping appears to be superior to endoloop in terms of shorter surgical time and lower risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation in laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. However, both techniques have similar outcomes regarding hospital stay and overall complications. Further research addressing study limitations and exploring patient-centered outcomes is warranted to guide clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Emergency surgery (ES) for complicated appendicitis (CA) is associated with high morbidity. Interval appendectomy (IA) decreases this rate; however, nonoperative management (NOM) is not always successful. Some patients require unplanned ES due to NOM failure (IA failure: IA-F). This study aimed to verify the benefits of IA and to evaluate the risk factors for NOM failure., Methods: Patients diagnosed with CA who underwent surgery between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the surgical outcomes of the ES group with those of the IA success (IA-S) and IA-F groups. We also analyzed 14 factors that predicted NOM failure., Results: Among 302 patients, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) was significantly higher in the ES group (N = 165) than in the IA-S group (N = 102). The rates were equal between the ES (N = 165) and IA-F (N = 35) groups. NOM was successful in 110 patients and failed in 27. Lack of abscesses, comorbidities, high WBC count, and free air were independent risk factors for NOM failure., Conclusions: Considering the benefits of IA and the non-inferior surgical outcomes of IA-F compared to ES, IA is a good therapeutic strategy for CA. However, in patients exhibiting four independent risk factors for NOM failure, careful monitoring of unplanned ES is necessary., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Introduction: Suspected appendicitis is the most common indication for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Diagnosis and management of these patients can be challenging. Atypical clinical presentation has been described before, but the current literature consists mostly of small case series. Therefore, we conducted a large retrospective study to analyze the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs, laboratory findings and imaging modalities in pregnant woman undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis compared to a control group of non-pregnant women of childbearing age. We further describe intra- and postoperative findings in both groups., Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy were retrieved from the electronic patient database and analyzed. Preoperative clinical, laboratory and imaging findings as well as intra- and postoperative characteristics were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women., Results: Between January 2008 and June 2023, 99 pregnant woman and 1796 non-pregnant woman between the ages of 16 and 49 underwent emergency surgery for suspected appendicitis. Pregnant women were less likely to have right lower quadrant tenderness (p = 0.002), guarding (p = 0.011) and rebound tenderness (p = 0.097). A greater percentage of pregnant women had a symptom duration of more than 24 h before presentation (p = 0.003) Abdominal ultrasound showed a reduced diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women (p = 0.004). MRI was used in eight pregnant women and showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. Pregnant women had a longer operating time (p = 0.006), a higher rate of open appendectomies or conversion (p < 0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (3.2 days vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.001). The perforation rate was also higher in pregnant women at 16% vs. 10% (p = 0.048)., Conclusion: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy presents a challenge for the clinician. Our data confirm the paradigm of "atypical presentation" which should lead to an extended diagnostic workup. Ultrasound showed less diagnostic accuracy in pregnant women in our study. MRI is a useful tool to reduce uncertainty and the rate of negative appendectomies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Unlike acute appendicitis, chronic appendicitis is characterized by nonspecific abdominal pain and intermittent course. This may lead to late diagnosis or misdiagnosis, with the possibility of serious complications., Case Report: A male patient of Arab origin aged 55 years had a 2-year history of recurrent episodes of mild pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. The episodes were associated with nausea, chills, and abdominal bloating but no vomiting, rectal bleeding, or weight loss. On examination, the patient showed soft and lax abdomen with mild tenderness in the right lower quadrant, with no organomegaly or abdominal masses. Laboratory findings showed normal complete blood count and C-reactive protein. The patient underwent colonoscopy to rule out malignancy, which showed appendiceal orifice polyp that required resection. The computed tomography scan showed an enlarged appendix with multiple intraluminal dense appendicoliths. The largest stone at the appendiceal orifice measured 1.5 cm × 0.9 cm and was partially protruding within the cecal lumen. The diagnosis of chronic appendicitis was confirmed. The patient underwent appendectomy and was asymptomatic a few days after discharge., Conclusions: We are reporting a patient with chronic appendicitis presented with multiple appendicoliths. The patient was initially misdiagnosed as periappendiceal orifice polyp. The current finding highlights the importance of imaging, especially computed tomography in confirming the diagnosis in patients with atypical appendicitis presentation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Rationale: Sporadic cases of acute appendicitis (AA) in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection were still recorded at the end of COVID-19 pandemics. We consider that analyses of clinical courses and outcomes is useful to improve the clinical management of such cases in the setting of a general hospital., Patient Concerns: Patient #1 was a 14-year-old girl who presented with nausea, right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, myalgia, ad low-grade fever for 24 hours. Patient #2 was a 7-year-old boy with a 3-day history of abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, and fever lasting for 4 days. Patient # 3 was a 16-year-old girl RLQ pain, nausea and vomiting, and fever lasting for 7 days., Diagnoses: The patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis (AA) based on the clinical picture, labs and abdominal ultrasound (US) findings. SARS-CoV- 2 infection was diagnosed using rapid antigen test performed at admission., Interventions: The patients were started on i.v. Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole, antalgics and i.v. fluids at admission. Appendectomy was performed the day after admission in patients # 1 and #2, and after 48 hours in patient #3., Outcomes: Patient #1 had no complications and was discharged on postoperative day (POD) #5. Patient #2 developed a cecal fistula on POD #4 which was treated conservatively with Ertapenem, i.v. fluids, and local placement of colostomy bag. The fistula closed spontaneously on POD #12. He was discharged on POD #17. Patient #3 developed a postoperative abscess on POD # 6 and required laparoscopic surgical drainage of the abscess. She was discharged after another 6 days (POD #12). No patient required ICU admission, steroids, or supplemental O2 use during their hospitalization. There were no late complications or readmissions in these patients., Lessons: We consider that AA in these SARS-CoV-2 positive children had a similar course with SARS-CoV-2 negative cases. Compliance to previously established COVID-19 protocols was useful to improve the outcome. The parents should bring the sick child early to the hospital in order to avoid complications related to delayed presentation and not to SARS-CoV-2 infection itself., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) care has evolved during the past decades. Advances in care have contributed to improved survival among CHD patients. Children with CHD are requiring interventions for non-CHD related medical issues that occur in the general pediatric population., Methods: A retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database from January 1, 2004, to July 31, 2023. Discharges of patients with an admitting/principal diagnosis of appendicitis were evaluated and categorized as CHD or non-CHD., Results: A total of 319,228 patients were identified with 1,25,858(39.4%) female, 1,38,966(43.5%) white, and median age of 11[IQR:8-14] years. 708(0.2%) had CHD with 85(12%) of them having a diagnosis consistent with single-ventricle CHD (SV-CHD). In univariate analysis, CHD patients were more likely to undergo conservative treatment (n = 172(24.2%)vs n = 59,358(18.6%)) and less likely to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 483(68.2%) vs n = 2,35,324(73.8%))(p < 0.001) compared to non-CHD. After adjustment, CHD patients had increased odds of undergoing open appendectomy compared to non-CHD. CHD patients were more likely to have an ICU admission (OR:8.36(95%CI 6.35-10.00),p < 0.001) and had a 77.6%(95%CI 40.89-123.93) increase in length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: CHD patients are more likely to have an open appendectomy than non-CHD patients. These findings suggest a distinctive pattern in the care of CHD patients compared to non-CHD. Overall, CHD patients had a more intense level of care with longer LOS and increased ICU admissions. Further work is needed to evaluate drivers of management decisions, the role of conservative treatment with antibiotics alone in the CHD population, and the potential impacts and safety of a laparoscopic approach., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The present study investigated the level of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in perforated and nonperforated appendicitis patients. This issue is important for timely diagnosis of acute appendicitis complications and making decision about the surgical plan and type of incision., Methods: This prospective study was conducted on patients with acute appendicitis. 5-HIAA levels were measured in urine spot sample of every patient before the surgery. The patients were finally included based on result of pathology for presence of appendicitis or not and sorted by direct surgical detection for exist of perforation or not. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of 5-HIAA were investigated. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS v.27., Results: A total of 150 patients were included in two groups as 40 patients in the perforated appendicitis group and 110 patients in the noncomplicated acute appendicitis group. The average age of patients in the perforated appendicitis group was 28.8 ± 6.07 years, and that of patients in the acute appendicitis group was 29.6 ± 6.96 years. 94 patients (63%) were male, and 56 (37%) were female. No significant difference was observed in terms of age or sex between the two groups. The difference in the 5-HIAA concentration between the acute appendicitis group (0.3 ± 0.04 mg/dl) and the perforated appendicitis group (0.5 ± 0.03 mg/dl) was significant (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 82%, 62%, 75%, 77%, and 88% respectively., Conclusion: This study shows that the 5-HIAA concentration in patients with perforated appendicitis can potentially increased significantly more than that in patients in the early stages of acute appendicitis. further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to prove the present results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Appendicitis is 1 of the most frequent diseases worldwide. In general, it is treated with appendectomy, which, in almost all cases, leads to the healing of the disease and averts acute complications. However, only limited data regarding long-term sequalae, including inflammatory bowel diseases following appendicitis are available. We therefore investigated the association between appendicitis and both Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The present study included 23,991 patients with a history of appendicitis and 23,991 that did not have such a history. Patients were identified within the Disease Analyzer (IQVIA) database in Germany between 2010 and 2020. After a follow-up period of up to 10 years, 0.74% of patients with a history of appendicitis and 0.45% of those in the nonappendicitis cohort were diagnosed with CD (P < .001). Our regression analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant association between appendicitis and the incidence of CD in the entire study population (Hazard ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-2.53). Importantly, this association remained largely consistent across all age groups and both genders. In contrast, no statistically significant link was observed between appendicitis and the subsequent development of UC (Hazard ratio: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.90-1.71). The present study presents novel data from a large cohort of outpatients in Germany, providing strong evidence for an association between appendicitis and the development of CD (but not UC). These findings contribute to the existing body of literature and may facilitate the recognition of appendicitis as a risk factor for the development of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: Surgical site infection (SSI) is common after laparoscopic appendectomy, resulting in prolonged hospital stay and increased costs. This study examined the relationship between body composition parameters and risk of incisional SSI in patients with complicated appendicitis., Methods: We included 411 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis at a single institution between March 2015 and October 2023. Body composition parameters were derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT). A nomogram was constructed based on the independent predictors of incisional SSI., Results: Overall, 45 (10.9%) patients developed incisional SSI. Visceral fat area (VFA) was independently associated with risk of incisional SSI (hazard ratio 1.015, 95% confidence interval 1.010-1.020, P < 0.001). A nomogram integrating VFA and two other independent predictors (diabetes and conversion) demonstrated high discriminative (area under the curve = 0.793) and calibration abilities., Conclusions: CT-derived VFA could be a valuable predictor of incisional SSI in patients with complicated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic surgery. A VFA-based nomogram may help in identifying patients at high risk of SSI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Gangrene and perforation are severe complications of acute appendicitis, associated with a higher mortality rate compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Accurate preoperative identification of Gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (GPA) is crucial for timely surgical intervention., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study includes 796 patients who underwent appendectomy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are used to develop a nomogram model for predicting GPA based on laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) findings. The model is validated using an external dataset., Results: Seven independent predictors were included in the nomogram: white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, D-dimer, serum glucose, albumin, maximum outer diameter of the appendix, and presence of appendiceal fecalith. The nomogram achieved good discrimination and calibration in both the training and testing sets. In the training set, the AUC was 0.806 (95%CI: 0.763-0.849), and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 66.9%, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good calibration (P = 0.7378). In the testing set, the AUC was 0.799 (95%CI: 0.741-0.856), and the sensitivity and specificity were 70.5% and 75.3%, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram., Conclusion: The laboratory test-CT nomogram model can effectively identify GPA patients, aiding in surgical decision-making and improving patient outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain requiring surgery, usually managed with laparoscopic appendectomy. In Denmark, the standard postoperative treatment for complicated cases involves intravenous antibiotics. This study compares peroral versus intravenous antibiotics in the context of fast-track surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of peroral versus intravenous antibiotics on patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis., Methods: This was a sub-study within a broader Danish cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial conducted at Zealand University Hospital, focusing on adult patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Participants were randomized into two groups: one receiving a three-day course of peroral antibiotics and the other intravenous antibiotics after surgery. Recovery quality was assessed on the third postoperative day using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire., Results: The study included 54 patients, 23 in the peroral and 31 in the intravenous groups. The peroral group reported significantly better recovery outcomes, with higher QoR-15 scores (mean difference of 12 points, p < 0.001). They also experienced shorter hospital stays, averaging 47 h less than the intravenous group (p < 0.001). No significant differences between the groups were observed in readmissions or severe postoperative complications., Conclusions: Peroral antibiotic administration after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis significantly improves patient recovery and reduces hospital stay compared to intravenous antibiotics. These results advocate a potential shift towards peroral antibiotic use in postoperative care, aligning with ERAS principles., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04803422., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, many children with appendicitis and COVID-19 were initially treated non-operatively and later underwent interval appendectomy. Currently, children with both appendicitis and COVID-19 frequently undergo upfront appendectomy. The impact of this return to upfront surgical management on patient outcomes is unknown. This study compared outcomes of pediatric patients with and without COVID-19 infection undergoing appendectomy., Study Design: A retrospective cohort study of children < 21y who underwent appendectomy from 3/19/2020 to 7/31/2022 at 50 Pediatric Health Information System children's hospitals was conducted. Children with documented COVID-19 were identified. Exclusions included preoperative ventilator or supplemental oxygen dependence, and missing data. To evaluate COVID-19 positive versus COVID-19 negative patients, we used a propensity score matched on sociodemographics, comorbidities, laparoscopy, perforation, and hospital. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests identified differences between groups in length of stay, postoperative drain placement, 30-day re-admission, and mechanical ventilation requirements., Results: Overall, 51,861 children of median age 11y (IQR: 8-14) underwent appendectomy, of whom 1,440 (2.3%) had COVID-19. Most were male (60.3%), White (72.1%) and non-Hispanic (61.4%). Public insurance was the most common (47.5%). We created a matched cohort of 1,360 COVID-19 positive and 1,360 COVID-19 negative children. Children with COVID-19 had shorter hospitalizations (1d, IQR: 1-4 vs. 2d, IQR: 1-5, p = 0.03), less postoperative peritoneal drain placement (2.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.01), and fewer 30-day readmissions (9.0% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04). However, no difference in incidence or duration of mechanical ventilation (p > 0.05) was detected., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that upfront appendectomy for children with appendicitis and COVID-19 has similar outcomes compared to children without COVID-19., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Study was designed in order to evaluate the discrepancies between surgical and histological diagnosis in pediatric acute appendicitis (AA) and to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomies (OA)., Methods: In a retrospective observational cohort, AA patients were included under 18 years of age, operated between 2011 and 2020. Surgical diagnosis was defined by the operating surgeon. The histological findings were classified as uncomplicated and complicated AA. The LOS and complications were also statistically analyzed., Results: Altogether, 1444 patients were included. Significant strong correlation and a moderate to substantial agreement were found between the surgeon's and the histopathological findings in all appendectomy cases (weighted kappa value in OA: 0.633, LA: 0.639, total sample: 0.637). If the surgeon's diagnosis was less severe than the pathologist's, the LOS was 4 (3;7) days, whereas if the surgical diagnosis was correct, the LOS was 3 (3;5) days (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In contrary to the literature, our study revealed a strong correlation and moderate agreement between the intraoperative and histopathological findings regarding the severity of AA. Complicated cases are distinctly recognizable during the surgery. In case the surgeon underestimates the severity of AA, the chance of complications is higher., Level of Evidence: II., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen. Rarely, it may form adhesions to nearby structures, complicating surgeries, especially when involving vascular structures such as the internal iliac artery, potentially causing severe intraoperative hemorrhage., Case Presentation: A 65-year-old Middle Eastern male presented with abdominal pain and anorexia for 5 days. Examination and imaging confirmed acute appendicitis with complications. Additionally, a large pelvic mass was noted. During surgery, severe bleeding was encountered due to an adhesion between the appendix and the right internal iliac artery, managed by ligating the artery. The patient recovered well and was discharged in stable condition. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis., Conclusion: This case highlights a rare vascular complication of appendectomy due to abnormal adhesions between the appendix and the internal iliac artery, associated with a large pelvic mass. This study emphasizes the need for thorough preoperative evaluation and careful surgical planning in patients with unusual anatomical variations or specific underlying conditions such as neurofibromatosis. Early recognition and strategic management of vascular adhesions are essential to optimize patient outcomes in appendectomies complicated by such rare scenarios., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis (AA) may be improved by using inflammatory markers. This study assessed the reliability of inflammatory markers in diagnosing AA in our patient population., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at King Edward Hospital (KEH) from January 2020 to June 2021. Data was collected on all patients with AA who underwent appendicectomy. Variables of age, gender, comorbidities, HIV status Alvarado score histology, C-reactive protein (CRP), and white cell count (WCC) were reviewed. A p -value of < 0.05 is deemed as statistically significant., Results: The study cohort was comprised of 150 patients - 58(39%) females and 92(61%) males. Thirty-two (21.3%) patients had a normal appendix, of whom 19 had a normal WCC. The majority of patients 80 (53.3%) had inflamed appendix, and 38 (25.3%) had ruptured appendix. The sensitivity and specificity of WCC and the CRP were 81% and 46% and 100% and 18.6% respectively. No patient with a ruptured appendix had normal CRP. The CRP correlated with the ruptured appendix with a median of 141.5 and, p -value of 0.01. The level of WCC and the presence of a ruptured appendix had a significant correlation with a p -value of 0.002, median of 15.2., Conclusion: A combination of WCC and CRP tests improves the diagnostic accuracy. There is a correlation between CRP level and ruptured appendicitis. In our setting, AA is likely to present late once it has already ruptured. The reasons behind this late presentation need to be explored and addressed., (Copyright© Authors.)

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain necessitating surgical intervention. While the traditional treatment has been urgent appendectomy, recent studies suggest that an antibiotics-first approach can be safe for uncomplicated cases. Classifying appendicitis into uncomplicated and complicated categories is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and predicting patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the distinct imaging findings associated with uncomplicated appendicitis and its complicated subtypes-phlegmonous, gangrenous, and perforated appendicitis-to aid in differential diagnosis., Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2023 and included 1,250 patients (492 women, 758 men) who underwent an appendectomy with available pathology results. After excluding 56 patients with normal pathology, 52 with non-appendicitis pathologies, and 48 with inaccessible computed tomography (CT) images, 1,094 patients were analyzed. CT images were evaluated for appendiceal diameter, wall thickness, cecal wall thickness, periappendiceal fat stranding, effusion, lymphadenopathy, intraluminal and free periappendiceal air, mucosal hyperenhancement, and the presence of appendicolith., Results: The diameter of the appendix, along with the presence of periappendiceal air, effusion, and intraluminal appendicolith, were significantly higher in the perforated appendicitis group compared to other groups (p<0.05). Periappendiceal fat stranding, evaluated as a binary variable, did not show significant differences among the groups. Appendiceal wall thickness was higher in the perforated group and lower in the non-perforated gangrenous group compared to the uncomplicated group (p<0.05). No significant correlation was found for mucosal hyperenhancement between the appendicitis subgroups. Intraluminal air, though normal in a healthy appendix, was a specific predictor of complicated appendicitis when combined with other findings., Conclusion: This study provides a detailed analysis of distinct imaging findings associated with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Key differentiators such as appendiceal diameter, periappendiceal air, effusion, and intraluminal appendicolith are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The findings highlight the importance of these parameters in distinguishing various types of appendicitis, offering valuable insights for clinical practice. Future prospective studies and advanced imaging techniques are needed to validate these findings and enhance the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis and its complications.

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency characterized by appendix inflammation. Surgery remains the gold standard for treatment with laparoscopy gaining in popularity. However, the optimal timing for appendectomy remains unclear. We are not aware of studies evaluating potential differences in clinical outcomes among appendectomies performed during the daytime and at night., Methods: We followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched the ScienceDirect, Medline, and Google Scholar databases for studies published in English before June 2023. We included prospective and retrospective studies reporting appendectomy outcomes. We categorized the appendectomy procedure times as daytime or night-time based on each study's definitions. We extracted baseline characteristics and outcomes and assessed the quality of the studies included using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using random-effects models; and, we assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic., Results: We analyzed data from 12 studies for systematic review ( n =19,183) including daytime ( n =11,839) and night-time ( n =7344) appendectomies. For the meta-analysis, we included 9 studies, that evaluated outcomes such as mortality (pooled RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.09-2.01; I2 =43.7%; P =0.11), hospital stay (WMD, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.20; I2 =93.3%; P <0.001), and complications (pooled RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.64-1.45; I2 =65.1%; P =0.02). We found similar mortality rates, hospital stay lengths, and complications for the appendectomies, regardless of the time of day of the operation. The baseline characteristics of the patients were also similar, except for the duration of symptoms and the presence of an appendiceal abscess., Conclusion: Our results showed that the timing of an appendectomy (daytime vs. night-time) does not significantly affect its outcomes. Surgeon availability or fatigue, and patient severity may not significantly impact the operation results. Standardized protocols and perioperative care ensure consistent outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Appendectomies are one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. Limited English proficiency (LEP) may lead to disparities in health outcomes between English-proficient and LEP patients. This study assesses the association between LEP and postoperative outcomes in pediatric appendectomy., Methods: We analyzed records from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database from 2010 to 2023 under 18 y of age undergoing appendectomy at our institution. LEP was defined as the need for an interpreter. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative emergency department (ED) visits within 30 d of discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed., Results: One thousand one hundred forty three children with appendicitis were identified, with 208 (18.2%) LEP and 935 (81.8%) English-proficient patients. LEP children were more likely to present with complicated appendicitis (42.8% versus 25.5%, P < 0.0001) and sepsis (34.1% versus 21.6%, P = 0.0003). LEP patients experience more serious (8.6% versus 3.9%, P = 0.02), overall complications (10.1% versus 5.5%, P = 0.006), and organ/surgical space site infections (8.2% versus 3.3%, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis controlling for ethnicity and factors associated with complicated presentation, LEP was associated with increased postoperative ED visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40-4.39), but not LOS (aOR 1.86, 95% CI = 0.87-3.97) or complications (aOR 1.76, 95% CI = 0.79-4.00)., Conclusions: LEP is independently associated with increased postoperative ED visits. Higher rates of complications and longer LOS may be related to increased complicated appendicitis at presentation. The role of cultural preferences and other social determinants of health that contribute to these disparities needs more investigation., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 16-year-old woman complained of intermittent epigastric pain for one year. The gastroscopy, colonoscopy and laboratory findings were normal. Physical examination was unremarkable other than upper abdominal tenderness. The symptom was not relieved in past medical treatment. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed appendix wall swelling and suspected appendicitis. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) with eyeMax (Micro-tech, China) was proposed to perform after informed consent obtained. A colonoscopy with a transparent cap (Olympus, Japan) attached to the tip was inserted into the cecum, and advanced the level of appendicular orifice. Subsequently, the Gerlach's valve was pushed aside using the transparent cap. Finally, the eyeMax was placed in the appendicular orifice, slowly moved forward in appendicular lumen. The eyeMax showed a lot of appendicular stones, and irrigated repeatedly. The stones were expulsed smoothly. The patient was discharged two days later without recurrent epigastric pain on follow-up and to date.

Background: This study aims to identify the common pathways of appendicectomy, the most common emergency surgery in Australia's public hospitals and any variations within a regional public health district in New South Wales, Australia., Methods: We analyzed the electronic medical records of 3,943 patients who underwent appendicectomy between January 2014 and July 2020 at 2 hospitals in the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia, using the PM 2 approach for surgical pathway identification and subsequent statistical analyses., Results: Among 3,943 patients, 3,606 (91.5%) followed an 11-step main pathway: (1) emergency department admission, (2) surgery booking, (3) anesthesia start, (4) operating room entry, (5) surgery start, (6) surgery end, (7) anesthesia end, (8) operating room discharge, (9) postanesthesia care unit admission, (10) postanesthesia care unit discharge, and (11) hospital discharge. The median length of stay was 48.13 hours (interquartile range 32.74). The main pathway differed from either variation 1 (n = 246, 6.2%) or variation 2 (n = 30, 0.8%) only in the timing and location of anesthesia administration or conclusion. Variation 3 (n = 26, 0.7%) included patients who underwent appendicectomy twice, whereas variation 4 (n = 25, 0.6%) included patients booked for surgery before emergency department admission through community doctor referrals. Thirteen exceptional cases experienced combinations of the aforementioned pathways. The length of stay and phase durations varied between the main pathway and these variations., Conclusion: The appendicectomy pathway was largely standardized across the studied hospitals, with the location of anesthesia administration or conclusion affecting specific stages but not the overall length of stay. Only a complex 2-surgery pathway increased length of stay., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Appendectomy remains a common pediatric surgical procedure with an estimated 80,000 operations performed each year. While prior work has reported the existence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, we sought to characterize potential income-based inequalities using a national cohort., Methods: All non-elective pediatric (<18 years) hospitalizations for appendectomy were tabulated in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Only those in the highest ( HI ) and lowest income ( LI ) quartiles were considered for analysis. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the independent association of income and postoperative major adverse events (MAE)., Results: Of an estimated 87,830 patients, 36,845 (42.0%) were HI and 50,985 (58.0%) were LI . On average, LI patients were younger (11 [7-14] vs 12 [8-15] years, P < .001), more frequently insured by Medicaid (70.7 vs 27.3%, P < .05), and more commonly of Hispanic ethnicity (50.8 vs 23.4%, P < .001). Following risk adjustment, the LI cohort was associated with greater odds of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.30 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.64). Specifically, low-income status was linked with increased odds of infectious (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.42) and respiratory (AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62) complications. Further, LI was associated with a $1670 decrement in costs ([2220-$1120]) and a +.32-day increase in duration of stay (95% CI [.21-.44])., Conclusion: Pediatric patients of the lowest income quartile faced increased risk of major adverse events following appendectomy compared to those of highest income. Novel risk stratification methods and standardized care pathways are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic disparities in postoperative outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Language preference is a contributing factor for prolonged time from symptom onset to appendectomy within pediatrics, but is poorly characterized in adults. We aimed to investigate associations between language barriers and delays in assessment and treatment for adults with acute appendicitis., Methods: In a multiethnic community, patients aged ≥18 years old who underwent appendectomy were identified between January 2017 and August 2022 at a single institution. Negative binomial regression was used to compare interval wait times to imaging, medication administration, and surgical evaluation between patients with limited English proficiency and those who are English proficient., Results: Of the 1469 patients included, 48% (n = 699) were with limited English proficiency. Average age was higher for patients with limited English proficiency (45 vs 36, P < .001). Most of them were Asian (54%) and without private insurance (65%, P < .001). Symptom duration, incidence of septic shock, and date/time of presentation to the emergency department were similar. Patients with limited English proficiency presented more frequently with gangrenous appendicitis (20% vs 15%, P = .013) but not perforated (23% vs 20%, P = .065). They experienced longer wait times for surgical evaluation (376 vs 348 min, incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.08; P = .002) but similar times for imaging, and medications administered. After controlling for demographics, triage acuity, and hospital factors, significantly longer wait times for surgical evaluation persisted (IRR adjusted, 1.07; P = .038). There was no significant difference in hospital length-of-stay, postoperative infection, or 30-day readmission rate., Conclusion: Adult patients with limited English proficiency may experience longer wait times for surgical evaluation for acute appendicitis, but this may not result in clinically significant delays in the initiation of treatment., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background/purpose: Acute appendicitis (AA) stands as the most prevalent cause of acute abdominal pain among children. The potential for morbidity escalates significantly when uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) progresses to complicated appendicitis (CA), which can encompass gangrenous, necrotic, or perforated appendicitis. Consequently, establishing an early and accurate diagnosis of AA, and effectively differentiating CA from UA, becomes paramount. This study explores the diagnostic utility of various blood biomarkers for distinguishing CA from UA in pediatric patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records pertaining to pediatric patients who underwent surgery for AA. Patients were categorized as either having UA or CA based on histopathological examination of the appendix. The data collected and analyzed included demographic information, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil proportion, lymphocyte proportion, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels upon admission., Results: Among the 192 pediatric patients who underwent surgery for AA, 150 were diagnosed with UA, while 42 were diagnosed with CA. The CA group exhibited significantly higher neutrophil proportions, NLRs, PLRs, and CRP levels, alongside lower lymphocyte proportions (all p < 0.01) compared to the UA group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis disclosed that CRP exhibited the highest specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting CA., Conclusion: CRP emerges as a valuable biomarker for differentiating complicated appendicitis from uncomplicated appendicitis., (Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures, including financial, consultant, institutional and other relationships that may lead to bias or conflict of interest.

Background: The increased use of remote monitoring and telemedicine support may help alleviate the need for some of the postoperative inpatient hospital care and reduce health care costs, but little is known about current postoperative hospital resource use patterns. We aim to describe hospital resources use patterns in pediatric patients postappendectomy for complicated appendicitis and to evaluate the potential of earlier discharge with remote monitoring., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Health care use/costs (antibiotics, intravenous fluids [proxy for diet], analgesics, laboratory studies, and imaging tests) were determined using administrative billing data. Potentially avoidable days were defined as nondischarge days without codes for intravenous opioid pain medication or intravenous fluids. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used., Results: In total, 24,165 patients were included: 8,300 patients (34.3%) had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day, totaling 13,970 days or 14.2% of all hospitalization days. Median hospitalization cost was $19,434 [$15,658-$25,157], with accommodation and operating room being the greatest contributors. Public insurance and minority races and ethnicities were associated with greater odds of potentially avoidable days. More than 80% of hospitalized patients had intravenous antibiotics through 10 days postoperatively. More than 20% received opioids daily., Conclusions: More than one third of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis could have had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day. Remote monitoring and telemedicine support should be explored and could help with earlier discharge and lower costs., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of direct visualization (single-use eyeMax subscope) endoscopic management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis., Methods: Thirty-six patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, confirmed by computed tomography or ultrasonography, from Jan 2023 to Feb 2024 were enrolled in this study. We collected demographics, colonoscopy findings, subscope findings, clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), and adverse events associated with ERAT., Results: Appendiceal intubation was successful for all 36 patients. Thirty-five patients (97.2%) were definitely confirmed as having acute uncomplicated appendicitis. One patient with negative appendicitis was diagnosed as having cecal diverticulitis with fecalith incarceration. The mean procedure time was 13.1 ± 13.6 min. One patient presented with worsening abdominal pain, and a computed tomography scan suggested a perforated appendix. The mean length of hospitalizations was 1.78 ± 2 days. The mean follow-up was 158 days; during this period, two patients (5.6%) experienced recurrent abdominal pain after 23 and 88 days and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy., Conclusion: Direct visualization ERAT may be effective for diagnosing and treating acute uncomplicated appendicitis and seems to have a low complication rate., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA., Method: We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure‑related parameters, and follow‑up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique., Results: The mean age was 56.0 years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5 min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6 min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23 months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor., Conclusion: Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Since introducing new and alternative treatment options may increase decisional conflict, we aimed to describe the use of the decision support tool (DST) and its impact on treatment preference and decisional conflict., Background: For the treatment of appendicitis, antibiotics are an effective alternative to appendectomy, with both approaches associated with a different set of risks (eg, recurrence vs surgical complications) and benefits (eg, more rapid return to work vs decreased chance of readmission). Patients often have limited knowledge of these treatment options, and DSTs that include video-based educational materials and questions to elicit patient preferences about outcomes may be helpful. Concurrent with the Comparing Outcomes of Drugs and Appendectomy trials, our group developed a DST for appendicitis treatment ( www.appyornot.org )., Methods: A retrospective cohort including people who self-reported current appendicitis and used the AppyOrNot DST between 2021 and 2023. Treatment preferences before and after the use of the DST, demographic information, and Ottawa Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) were reported after completing the DST., Results: A total of 8243 people from 66 countries and all 50 U.S. states accessed the DST. Before the DST, 14% had a strong preference for antibiotics and 31% for appendectomy, with 55% undecided. After using the DST, the proportion in the undecided category decreased to 49% ( P < 0.0001). Of those who completed the Ottawa Decisional Conflict Score (DCS; n = 356), 52% reported the lowest level of decisional conflict (<25) after using the DST; 43% had a DCS score of 25 to 50, 5.1% had a DCS score of >50 and 2.5% had and DCS score of >75., Conclusions: The publicly available DST appyornot.org reduced the proportion that was undecided about which treatment they favored and had a modest influence on those with strong treatment preferences. Decisional conflict was not common after use. The use of this DST is now a component of a nationwide implementation program aimed at improving the way surgeons share information about appendicitis treatment options. If its use can be successfully implemented, this may be a model for improving communication about treatment for patients experiencing emergency health conditions., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly encountered surgical emergencies on a global level. Due to the requirement of an immediate clinical diagnosis and the presence of limited resources, clinicians and diagnosticians refer to scoring systems to diagnose this condition, among which Alvarado and Tzanakis scoring systems are widely used. This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these two systems., Methods: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. All studies that reported diagnostic parameters of Alvarado and Tzanakis scores in patients with suspected acute appendicitis were selected. Diagnostic values such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were extracted from the selected studies and statistical analysis was performed with Meta Disc 1.4 software. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools. Fourteen studies were included in our meta-analysis which enrolled 2235 patients., Results: The overall sensitivity of the Tzanakis score was calculated as 0.86 (95% CI; 0.84-00.87) while the specificity was 0.73 (95% CI; 0.69-0.78). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9261 (SE; 0.0169) and the diagnostic Odds Ratio (OR) was 22.52 (95% CI; 9.47-53.56). The pooled sensitivity of Alvarado score was 0.67 (95% CI; 0.65-0.69) and the specificity was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.69-0.79). Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Alvarado score was 0.7389 (SE; 0.0489) and the diagnostic Odds Ratio was 4.92 (95% CI; 2.48-9.75)., Interpretation and Conclusion: The Tzanakis scoring system has a higher sensitivity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio when compared to the Alvarado score. However, the Alvarado score has a marginally better specificity making it more reliable in excluding acute appendicitis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction:  Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing field in medical research that could potentially help in the challenging diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) in children. However, usefulness of AI in clinical settings remains unclear. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of AIs in the diagnosis of AA in the pediatric population through a systematic literature review., Methods:  PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: "pediatric," "artificial intelligence," "standard practices," and "appendicitis," up to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST., Results:  A total of 302 articles were identified and nine articles were included in the final review. Two studies had prospective validation, seven were retrospective, and no randomized control trials were found. All studies developed their own algorithms and had an accuracy greater than 90% or area under the curve >0.9. All studies were rated as a "high risk" concerning their overall risk of bias., Conclusion:  We analyzed the current status of AI in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. The application of AI shows promising potential, but the need for more rigor in study design, reporting, and transparency is urgent to facilitate its clinical implementation., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed at investigating the risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy., Design: This is a prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study., Methods: The study involved 163 children aged 5 to 18 years who underwent appendectomy in the pediatric surgery clinic of a tertiary hospital between December 2022 and June 2023. The study data were collected through the patient information form, Baxter Retching Faces scale, and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, which included questions about the descriptive and clinical characteristics of the participants and was prepared by the researcher consistent with the literature., Findings: A significant relationship was observed between the severity of postoperative pain and the occurrence of PONV in patients with both nonperforated and perforated appendicitis (P < .001). In addition, operative time and the time to the first oral feeding were shorter in patients with nonperforated appendicitis in the non-PONV group (P = .005 and P = .042, respectively) Logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative pain, family history of PONV and appendix perforation were risk factors for PONV in children with both nonperforated and perforated appendicitis (P < .001, P = .040, and P < .001, respectively)., Conclusions: In children undergoing appendectomy, family history of PONV, severity of postoperative pain, increased operative time, and increased transition time to oral feeding are risk factors for PONV. Pediatric nurses, who have an important role in the management of PONV, should evaluate patients in terms of PONV risk in the preoperative period within the scope of evidence-based practices and perform pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions according to the degree of risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis is increasingly common. Effectiveness of NOM has been studied by identifying patients via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and no code for appendectomy. We sought to assess the accuracy of such administrative definitions., Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for appendicitis at five sites across the United States. Initial management plan and clinical severity were recorded by trained abstractors. We identified a gold standard cohort of patients with surgeon-diagnosed uncomplicated appendicitis and planned NOM. We defined two administrative cohorts with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and either no surgery during initial admission (definition #1) or no surgery on day 0-1 of admission (definition #2). We compared each definition to the gold standard., Results: Among 1224 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 72 (5.9%) underwent planned NOM. NOM patients were older (median [Q1-Q3] of 37 [27-56] versus 32 [25-44] y) and less frequently male (51.4% versus 54.9%), White (54.1% versus 67.6%), and privately insured (38.9% versus 50.2%) than patients managed operatively. Definition #1 had sensitivity of 0.81 and positive predictive value of 0.87 for NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. Definition #2 had sensitivity of 0.83 and positive predictive value of 0.72. The gold standard cohort had a true failure/recurrence rate of 23.6%, compared with apparent rates of 25.4% and 39.8%, respectively., Conclusions: Administrative definitions are prone to misclassification in identifying planned NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. This likely impacts outcomes in studies using administrative databases. Investigators should disclose how misclassification may affect results and select an administrative definition that optimally balances sensitivity and specificity for their research question., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  To describe our technique and share our experience with image-guided transrectal drainage (TRD) of pelvic abscesses in children., Materials and Methods:  Retrospective review and analysis of indications for image-guided TRD and examination of procedural outcomes in pediatric patients with pelvic abscesses over 8 years., Results:  A total of 69 patients (33 males and 36 females) with symptomatic pelvic abscesses underwent image-guided TRD. The median age and weight of the patients were 11.5 years (range, 3-18) and 46.8 kg (range, 15.1-118.0), respectively. The etiologies of the pelvic abscesses were perforated appendicitis (72.5%) and post-operative collections (27.5%). All patients presented with abdominal pain. Fever, emesis, and diarrhea were also common symptoms. The size of the pelvic abscesses ranged from 24.0 to 937.1 mL (median, 132.7). Technical success was achieved in 68 of 69 TRD procedures (98.6%). Clinical improvement was observed in all patients with technically successful TRD. The TRD catheter dwell time ranged from 0 to 10 days (median, 4.0). Most patients who underwent TRD for perforated appendicitis subsequently underwent elective appendectomy after the resolution of the pelvic abscess (84.0%). The median time from TRD to elective appendectomy was 2.8 months (range, 0.3-6.1). There were no procedure-related complications., Conclusion:  Image-guided TRD is a safe and effective procedure with high technical and clinical success rates for the treatment of pelvic abscesses in children., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pinworm, Enterobius vermicularis, is a common parasitic illness, particularly among children in Palestine. On rare occasions, it can cause serious consequences such as acute appendicitis, which can still present a challenging diagnosis especially in children., Case Presentation: This report describes two cases (a 9 year old male and a 11 year old female, both Palestinian children from Hebron district) of acute appendicitis referred to Queen Alia Hebron Governmental Hospital in Palestine. The clinical examination revealed a lower abdominal pain, and they were diagnosed with appendicitis. The pathological examination after appendectomy showed the presence of eggs and pinworms. Anthelminthic medication was provided, and they were followed up for 6 weeks after the operation without any incidents., Conclusion: These cases highlight the importance of considering Enterobius vermicularis infestation in children with abdominal pain, as the parasites can mimic appendicitis. Prompt recognition and cautious laparoscopic appendectomy are crucial to prevent unnecessary surgery and peritoneal contamination, with the infestation being easily treatable with anthelmintic medication., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of complicated appendicitis in overweight/obese adolescents., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 226 adolescent patients with complicated appendicitis who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to June 2022. Among them, 102 cases underwent transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy as the observation group, and another 124 cases underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy as the control group. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of incisional pain, postoperative flatus time, length of hospital stay, surgical site infection (SSI), satisfaction with cosmetic result, and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups., Results: Both groups completed the surgery smoothly, and there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMI, duration of illness, white blood cell count, and preoperative CRP value between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the observation group had shorter hospital stays, shorter duration of incisional pain, shorter postoperative time to flatus, and lower overall postoperative complication rates compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The observation group had higher satisfaction with cosmetic result compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Both groups were followed up for one year postoperatively, and there were no occurrences of residual appendicitis or severe adhesive intestinal obstruction., Conclusion: When proficiently mastered, the application of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of complicated appendicitis in overweight/obese adolescents offers advantages such as minimal trauma, rapid recovery, fewer complications, and improved aesthetic outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The diagnosis and management of fever of unknown origin pose significant challenges in the field of infectious diseases, as it is influenced by various factors. Infectious diseases have long been recognized as the primary etiology of fever of unknown origin. However, not all infectious diseases can definitively identify the causative pathogen and infection sites., Case Presentation: we present a case report of an individual with fever, nausea, and anorexia but did not report any abdominal pain. Physical examination revealed no signs of abdominal tenderness. Repeated imaging studies including enhanced CT and color US of the appendix, only one color US suggested the possibility of appendicitis. Despite effective anti-infective treatment, the patient continued to experience low-grade fever, leading to the decision for laparoscopic exploration and subsequent appendectomy. Pathological findings confirmed the presence of appendicitis. After the surgical procedure, the patient's temperature and infectious markers returned to within normal range, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of appendicitis., Conclusions: The atypical symptoms and signs, along with the negative imaging results, contribute to the under diagnosis of appendicitis and the progression of fever of unknown origin, thereby exacerbating the physical, mental, and economic burden on patients. Consequently, there are valuable insights to be gained regarding the management of both appendicitis and fever of unknown origin., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30)., Methods: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires., Discussion: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method., Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications., Results: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29)., Conclusions: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Surgical-site infection following open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis increases length of hospital stay and treatment costs while compromising patients' quality of life. Data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of super-oxidized solution in perforated appendicitis are lacking. The study objective was to determine the effect of peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution in reducing risk of surgical-site infection following open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis., Methods: In this multicentre RCT conducted between September 2020 and March 2022, patients aged 13 years and older with perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy were randomly assigned to receive peritoneal and wound lavage with either super-oxidized solution or normal saline. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 30 days after surgery. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque, sequentially numbered, sealed envelope. The patients, surgeons, outcome assessors and statisticians performing the analysis were blinded to treatment assigned., Results: A total of 102 consecutive patients (51 in the super-oxidized solution group and 51 in the normal saline group) were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The super-oxidized solution group showed a significant reduction in overall surgical-site infection (8 (15.6%) versus 19 (37.2%); relative risk (RR) 0.42; 95% c.i. 0.20 to 0.87; P = 0.014), and superficial surgical-site infection (5 (9.8%) versus 18 (35.3%); RR 0.28; 95% c.i. 0.11 to 0.69; P = 0.002), with a number-needed-to-treat of four patients. There were no adverse events in either group., Conclusions: Peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution is superior to normal saline in preventing surgical-site infection after open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04512196., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)

Background: Appendicitis is the most prevalent surgical emergency. The negative appendicectomy rate and diagnostic uncertainty are important concerns. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current appendicitis risk prediction models in patients with acute right iliac fossa pain., Methods: A nationwide prospective observational study was conducted, including all consecutive adult patients who presented with right iliac fossa pain. Diagnostic, clinical and negative appendicectomy rate data were recorded. The Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Adult Appendicitis Score systems were calculated with collected data to classify patients into risk categories. Diagnostic value and categorization performance were evaluated, with use of risk category-based metrics including 'true positive rate' (percentage of appendicitis patients in the highest risk category), 'failure rate' (percentage of patients with appendicitis in the lowest risk category) and 'categorization resolution' (true positive rate/failure rate)., Results: A total of 3358 patients from 84 centres were included. Female patients were less likely to undergo surgery than men (71.5% versus 82.5% respectively; relative risk 0.866, 95% c.i. 0.834 to 0.901, P < 0.001); with a three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate (11.3% versus 4.1% respectively; relative risk 2.744, 95% c.i. 2.047 to 3.677, P < 0.001). Ultrasonography was utilized in 56.8% and computed tomography in 75.2% of all patients. The Adult Appendicitis Score had the best diagnostic performance for the whole population; however, only RIPASA was significant in men. All scoring systems were successful in females patients, but Adult Appendicitis Score had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value. The RIPASA and the Adult Appendicitis Score had the best categorization resolution values, complemented by their exceedingly low failure rates in both male and female patients. Alvarado and AIR had extremely high failure rates in men., Conclusion: The negative appendicectomy rate was low overall, but women had an almost three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate despite lower likelihood to undergo surgery. The overuse of imaging tests, best exemplified by the 75.2% frequency of patients undergoing computed tomography, may lead to increased costs. Risk-scoring systems such as RIPASA and Adult Appendicitis Score appear to be superior to Alvarado and AIR., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate the psoriatic disease risk among patients with previous appendicitis., Methods: This study was a nationwide population-based case-control study about the association between the psoriatic disease risk among patients with a history of appendicitis in Taiwan. The study population consisted of newly diagnosed psoriatic disease with at least two outpatient visits, and the control group included those patients without psoriatic disease at the same index date. Patients with a previous diagnosis of appendicitis or who underwent appendectomy surgery prior to their psoriatic disease diagnosis were recorded. The odds ratio of psoriatic disease diagnosis in the two groups with and without a history of appendicitis were analyzed and compared., Results: A total of 48 894 individuals diagnosed with psoriatic disease were matched with 292 656 controls by age and gender. Notably, the proportion of patients with a history of appendicitis or primary appendectomy was significantly elevated among those with psoriatic disease compared with the control cohort (both p < .05). On average, the occurrence of appendicitis preceded the index date by 3.3 ± 2.3 years. Multivariate analysis revealed a heightened incidence rate of psoriatic disease in patients previously diagnosed with appendicitis, periodontal disease, Charlson comorbidity index score (CCIS) ≧1, and ill-defined intestinal infections. This association persisted after adjusting for confounding factors, such as periodontal disease, CCIS, Salmonella, and ill-defined intestinal infections. The odds ratios for psoriatic disease in individuals with a history of appendicitis, periodontal disease, CCIS ≧1, and ill-defined intestinal infections were 1.16, 1.008, 1.69, and 1.23, respectively, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of 1.03-1.31, 1.05-1.11, 1.65-1.74, and 1.20-1.26. These findings underscore the independent association between appendicitis and subsequent development of psoriatic disease, even after adjusting for relevant comorbidities and potential confounders., Conclusion: Our research illustrates that appendicitis is associated with an increased likelihood of developing a psoriatic disease, despite several limitations. These limitations encompass variables such as dietary and smoking habits, alongside other potential confounding factors that were not fully considered. Moreover, inherent biases in utilizing national health insurance data, such as the absence of laboratory information, as well as the constraints inherent in a retrospective study design, should be acknowledged., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: From a surgeon's perspective, appendicitis is treated with appendectomy and sometimes a normal appendix is removed. This study aimed to investigate the patients' perspectives on having surgery but not appendicitis and their involvement in treatment decisions., Methods: This study is reported according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guideline. Eligible participants either had a normal diagnostic laparoscopy with no resection of the appendix or a negative appendectomy confirmed by histopathology. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis., Results: This study consisted of 15 interviews. Analysis of the interviews resulted in the formulation of four categories: (1) discovering the results of the histopathology report, (2) thoughts on having a normal appendix removed or left in situ, (3) the scarce use of shared decision-making, and (4) general anesthesia and the risk of a burst appendix made the participants nervous., Conclusion: The amount of information communicated to the patients before and after surgery was sparse. The participants were not aware of the histopathology results and the participants were not involved in decision-making and were generally anxious about anesthesia and a burst appendix., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)