Search

Introduction: Epidemiological studies reported a mean 4-12% prevalence of unrecognized cancer in patients with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The objective of our study was to assess the relation between unprovoked DVT and first diagnosis of a previously undiagnosed cancer and to investigate if it is justified to routinely screen these patients for malignancy with computed tomography (CT) scan. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records data of 276 patients with unprovoked extremity DVT admitted from 2015 to 2021. All patients underwent basic laboratory exams and a contrast enhanced CT scan of thorax, abdomen and pelvis with the purpose of screening for an occult, underlying tumor. Results: In 46 patients (16.7%) a tumor was detected with malignancy confirmed in 37 cases (13.4%). In the majority (64.8%) the diagnosed tumor was confined to the primary organ with no or limited lymph node metastasis. In 16.2% the tumor was at advanced, metastatic stage. Lung (24.3%) and kidney (21.6%) were the most frequent primary locations, followed by colorectal (16.2%) and pancreatic (13.5%) cancer. Conclusion: Patients presenting with unprovoked DVT have a relatively high possibility of an underlying malignancy, indicating that high level of medical awareness is advised. Routine screening of these patients with CT scan may be helpful for the early diagnosis of cancer. &nbsp

Carotid atherosclerosis is responsible for a great proportion of ischemic strokes. Early identification of unstable or vulnerable carotid plaques, and therefore, of patients at high risk for stroke, is of significant medical and socioeconomical value. We reviewed the current literature and discussed the potential role of the most important serum biomarkers in identifying patients with carotid atherosclerosis who are at high risk for atheroembolic stroke.

Purpose: A variety of last-generation endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The purpose of this study is to report the preliminary clinical outcomes of the Minos trimodular stent-graft system, which was recently introduced to the European market. Materials and Methods: Between February 2020 and 2022, we treated 41 consecutive AAA patients (mean age 72.2±8.5, 37 males) with elective standard EVAR using the Minos. The mean maximum diameter of AAAs was 54.7±6.6 mm, the mean proximal neck’s (PN) diameter was 24.8±2.7 mm, while the relevant length and angulation were 16.0 mm and 21.7°, respectively. Overall, 22 (53.6%) patients presented with shorter and angulated PN, according to the stent-graft’s instructions of use, and in 6 (14.6%) patients the PN angulation >60° was combined with concomitant iliac angulation >60°. Eleven (26.8%) EVARs were performed with concomitant enormous iliac artery narrowing and tortuosity. Finally, in 19 (46.3%) AAAs, the distal iliac landing zone was aneurysmatic and they were treated with the bell-bottom technique in 17 patients and with limb extension to the external iliac artery in two cases. We evaluated technical and clinical success of the index procedures, which was based on the combination of five factors: freedom from EVAR-related mortality, from graft-related endoleak of any type, from migration at any part of graft as well the absence of notable increase AAA’s sac maximum diameter and the patency of bifurcated stent-graft and of access vessels. Results: Primary technical and clinical success of index procedures was 100%. During a median 12-month radiological follow-up the clinical success remained 100%. No type I or III endoleak, stent-graft migration, EVAR-related death, AAA rupture, or graft-related adverse events or reinterventions were documented. Four (9.8%) type II endoleaks were detected with stable AAA sac diameter. The overall incidence of sac regression was 34.1% (n=14). Conclusion: The preliminary results of our series showed that Minos provided excellent feasibility and safety features even through angulated and tortuous iliac vessels and in short and angulated PNs. The overall clinical success at 1 year suggests that performance of Minos follows very high standards. Further validation of these promising results with long-term data is acquired to complete the evaluation of this recently introduced stent-graft system. Clinical Impact The current study explored the clinical performance of a new in market ultra-low profile bifurcated abdominal aortic stent-graft, the MINOS. The early and 12-month results of study suggest that implantation of this stent-graft in standard EVAR, even in hostile proximal aortic neck and iliac vessels conditions, follows very high clinical standards and encourage the further clinical use of MINOS.

Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) represents an acute phase systemic inflammatory response following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Our objective was to investigate the risk factors associated with the manifestation and severity of PIS with various available stent-grafts.We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data covering the period 2016-2020. The study included 191 patients. Body temperature was recorded regularly and blood sample was obtained daily. The imaging protocol included computed tomography aortoiliac angiography before surgery and one month after. The volumes of pre-existing and new-onset mural thrombus were calculated in a semi-automated fashion. Five abdominal aortic stent-graft devices were used: Endurant™ ΙΙ, Anaconda™, TreoThe incidence of PIS was 21.5%. No significant differences were observed regarding demographics, risk factors, aneurysm anatomy or operative data. The amount of pre-existing and new-onset mural thrombus were not related with PIS (P=0.117 and P=0.096). PIS incidence in the polyester subgroup was 24.2%, significantly higher compared to 8.3% in the ePTFE subgroup. In-subgroup analysis revealed that the use of Anaconda™ was associated with the higher frequency (61.1%, P=0.021). Multivariate logistic regression showed that polyester was the single factor significantly associated with PIS (hazard ratio=2.6, P=0.043), as opposed to the new onset thrombus (hazard ratio=1.29, P=0.101).PIS is not uncommon and should be taken into consideration in patients presenting with fever after EVAR. The endograft's liner material seems to play the primordial role, with woven polyester to be attributed with significantly higher incidence.

INTRODUCTION To evaluate the current role of atherectomy techniques (ATH) in treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) at below the knee (BTK) arteries. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The PubMed and Embase were searched (last search on 11 September 2021) for studies reporting on the early and mid-term outcomes of ATH in BTK vessels. Analysis included the data from six studies, with a total of 1062 PAD patients treated with various ATH techniques. We compared them the ATH outcomes with the contemporaneous outcomes of plain balloon angioplasty alone or with bailout stenting. Early safety and efficacy were accessed with perioperative and 30-day technical success rate, which included the primary patency of the treated BTK arterial segment. Evaluation of clinical performance was based on target limb revascularization (TLR) and on major limb adverse events (MALEs) rates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The current body of literature mainly includes retrospective observational studies, and the level of derived evidence is low. The mean perioperative and 30-day technical success rate was 87.3%. The mean reported TLR and MALEs rates at 12 months were 6.6% and 4.7% respectively. The relevant rates in studies reporting at 24 months were 24.3% and 31.7% while in studies reporting at 36 months the rates were 37.0% and 23.0% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Based in low-quality evidence, it seems that ATH in BTK vessels has a high safety, high efficacy profile and durable outcomes at 12 months. In the midterm, the clinical success of ATH is compromised by increased TLR and MALEs rates. Comparison of ATH with other endovascular techniques in BTK treatment of PAD shows a slight lead of ATH at 1-year and equivalent clinical performance in the mid-term. Overall, ATH has a significant and potentially predominant role in treatment of BTK vessels.

Purpose: To measure the long-term proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) after elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a variety of contemporary, third-generation, endograft devices. Materials and Methods: This is a noninterventional prospective cohort study of 157 patients that underwent standard EVAR with self-expanding abdominal endografts. Patients’ recruitment lasted from 2013 to 2017, and postoperative follow-up was up to 5 years. A computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed at the first month and then at 1, 2, and 5 years. Proximal aortic neck’s (PAN) basic morphological characteristics (diameter, length, angulation) were measured based on the analysis of CTA in a standardized fashion. Neck-related adverse events, such as migration, endoleak or rupture, and reinterventions were recorded. Results: Significant straightening of the PAN was evident even in the first-month CTA with concurrent neck shortening that became significant at 5 years. Both the suprarenal aorta and the PAN significantly dilated overtime, with PAN dilating more progressively. Mean neck dilatation at the juxtarenal level was 0.8±0.4 mm at 1 year, 1.8±0.8 mm at 2 years, and 3.9±1.7 mm at 5 years, with a mean neck dilatation rate of 0.07 mm/month overall. The incidence of AND ≥2.5 mm was 37.2% at 2 years and 58.1% at 5 years after EVAR and was considered important (≥5 mm) in 11.5% of patients at 2 years and 30.6% of patients at 5 years. A multivariate analysis performed showed that the endograft oversizing, the preoperative neck diameter, and the preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter served as independent predictors of AND at 5 years. At the 5-year follow-up, 8 late type Ia endoleaks (6.5%) and 7 caudal migrations (5.6%) were identified, while no late ruptures were reported. In total, 11 late endovascular reinterventions (8.9%) were performed. Overall, proximal neck-related adverse outcomes (5/7 migrations and 5/8 endoleaks) and reinterventions (7/11) were significantly associated with the presence of important late AND. Conclusion: Proximal AND after EVAR is common. It can influence the long-term durability of proximal endograft fixation and is significantly associated with adverse outcomes, often leading to reinterventions. A systemic and extended surveillance protocol is needed for maintenance of good long-term results. Clinical Impact This is a thorough and systematic analysis of the long-term geometric remodeling of the proximal aortic neck after EVAR, that highlights the importance of a strict, and extended surveillance protocol for maintenance of good long-term results of EVAR.

Background: Treatment of calcified popliteal artery lesions represents an ongoing challenge for vascular specialists. Biomechanical forces of external compression, torsion and elongation that occur with locomotion in the popliteal segment can lead to stent fractures and occlusions. The aim of our study was to assess the procedural success rate of atherectomy in combination with balloon angioplasty for isolated calcified popliteal artery lesions. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2022, 62 patients with isolated atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery underwent endovascular treatment by use of rotational atherectomy (Phoenix, Philips USA, (subgroup A) or Jetstream, Boston USA, (subgroup B), atherectomy systems) and additional balloon angioplasty in two vascular centers. The primary outcome measures were: 1. periprocedural clinical and technical success (

To provide an updated systematic literature review summarizing current evidence on aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.An extensive electronic search in major electronic databases was conducted between January 2000 and December 2021. Eligible for inclusion were observational studies that followed up with patients (n ≥ 20) undergoing EVAR with self-expanding endografts, for 12 or more months, evaluated AND with computed tomography angiography and provided data on relevant outcomes. The primary end point was the incidence of AND after EVAR, and the secondary end points were the occurrence of type Ia endoleak, stent graft migration, secondary rupture, and reintervention.We included 34 studies with a total sample of 12,038 patients (10,413 men; median age, 71 years). AND was defined clearly in 18 studies, but significant differences in AND definition were evidenced. The pooled incidence of AND based on quantitative analysis of 16 studies with a total of 9201 patients (7961 men; median age, 72 years) was calculated at 22.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4-34.4) over a follow-up period ranging from 12 months to 14 years. The risk of a type Ia endoleak was significantly higher in AND patients compared with those without AND (odds ratio, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.10-7.93; P = .030). Similarly, endograft migration was more common in the AND group compared with the non-AND group (odds ratio, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.80-19.69; P = .004). The combined incidence of secondary rupture and reintervention did not differ significantly between the two groups, even though the combined effect was in favor of the non-AND group.Proximal AND after EVAR is common and occurs in a large proportion of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. AND can influence the long-term durability of proximal endograft fixation and is significantly related to adverse outcomes, often leading to reinterventions.

The mid-term results after treatment of isolated popliteal lesions have been limited. The aim of the present study was to report the mid-term outcomes after endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions.A multicenter (15 hospitals in five countries) retrospective cohort study was performed. Between June 2016 and June 2021, 651 consecutive patients who had been treated for isolated popliteal lesions using endovascular methods exclusively were included in the present study. Six techniques were identified, including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA; n = 286; 43.9%), drug-coated balloon angioplasty (n = 98; 15.1%), stenting with low-chronic outward force (COF) stents (n = 84; 12.9%), stenting with high-COF stents (n = 76; 11.7%), atherectomy alone (n = 17; 2.6%), and directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons (n = 90; 13.8%). The primary outcomes measures were primary and secondary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (F-CDTLR).The mean patient age was 74.5 years. Most of the patients (n = 409; 62.9%) had had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Popliteal occlusion was found in 400 cases (61.4%). High-grade calcification was present in 36.7% of cases. Immediate technical success was 94.8%. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 6-42 months). The actuarial rate for all patients at 26 months (per outcome measure) was as follows: primary patency, 73.9%; secondary patency, 88%; and F-CDTLR, 76.5%. When comparing PTA vs all other treatments in an adjusted regression analysis, the F-CDTLR was 75.2% for PTA vs 76.5% for all other treatment (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.48; P = .46, adjusted regression). The difference in secondary patency also was not statistically significant (85.7% for PTA vs 88%; P = .20). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the estimated primary patency was inferior for PTA in pairwise comparisons vs other treatments (P .001 vs atherectomy; P = .002 vs directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons; and P = .002 vs low-COF stenting).The results from our study have shown that endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal lesions is safe and associated with acceptable patency and F-CDTLR in the mid-term.

BACKGROUND Primary varicose veins (PVV) represent the most prominent clinical manifestation of chronic venous disease (CVD) and has a complex pathophysiological background. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of sonographic hemodynamical and contemporary epidemiological factors on the clinical severity of PVV. METHODS We analyzed the sonographic hemodynamical and clinical parameters from 159 consecutive CVD patients and 233 lower limbs with PVV of clinical stages C2, C3 and C4. Univariate and logistic regression analysis was performed between patients of C2 (N.=70 - 30.0%) and C3 - 4 stages and between subgroups C3 (N.=101 - 43.3%) and C4 (N.=62 - 26.6%). RESULTS Reflux of common femoral vein and saphenofemoral junction was detected in 43.3% and 65.7%. High venous reflux rates were found at the great saphenous above and below knee (90.1% - 53.2%) and in Cockett perforators (80.5%). Logistic regression revealed that factors associated with the symptomatic C3; 4 stages were the duration of disease >10 years (P=0.015, insufficiency in two or more perforators (P

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Cardiovascular complications, such as sudden arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, coronary events, cardiomyopathies and heart failure, may present in about 10-20% of patients with COVID-19. Patients with CKD, dialysis patients and KTR are all at increased cardiovascular risk and present with more cardiovascular complications after COVID-19 compared to the general population. During the pandemic, health care giving has rapidly changed by reducing elective outpatient reviews, which may refrain these high-risk patients from the appropriate management of their medical conditions, further increasing cardiovascular risk. Importantly, acute kidney injury (AKI) is another common complication of severe COVID-19 and associates with increased mortality. A large proportion of the AKI patients need renal replacement treatment, while 30% of them may not present renal function recovery and remain dialysis-dependent after discharge, thereby having potentially increased future cardiovascular risk. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding the cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with CKD or undergoing hemodialysis and in KTR.

Purpose Bridging stent stability is crucial for efficacy and safety of branched aortic endovascular repair (bEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). In this study, we assess the performance of the new Viabahn Balloon-Expandable endoprosthesis (VBX) in bEVAR. Based on our learning curve we give recommendations for a safe and effective use of the device. Materials and Methods We prospectively collected the data of patients with TAAAs undergoing bEVAR between December 2017 and December 2019. All patients with implantation of at least 1 VBX stent-graft as bridging stent were included in our single-center analysis. Demographic, comorbidity, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) data of 112 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was a composite of branch-related technical success and freedom from target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were clinical and ongoing clinical success. Results Primary endpoint: technical success was achieved in all patients (100%) with a freedom from target vessel instability of 96.3% after a median follow-up of 18 months. Overall mortality was 13.4% (n=15) and 13 patients underwent secondary interventions, 12 of them are still alive and 1 suffered from aneurysm sac expansion, consequently an ongoing clinical success of 75.9% was reached. After modification of the implantation technique during the course of the study by selecting longer stent lengths after accurate estimation of vessel curvature and expected adaptation of the flexible endoskeleton to the specific anatomical conditions, no type Ic endoleaks were observed in the last 70 cases. Conclusions The VBX stent-graft can be safely used as bridging stent for branched thoracoabdominal repair. However, learning curve should be considered to avoid type Ic endoleak and edge stenosis. Based on this experience longer landing zones and 2-step deployment of VBX are useful for successful bridging also of challenging target vessels.

Objective In the treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic pathologic processes, chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (CHEVAR) represents an alternative technique for urgent cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of CHEVAR in the elective setting. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected records of 165 consecutive asymptomatic CHEVAR patients who were treated between March 2009 and January 2018 with the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif). A total of 244 chimney grafts (CGs) were implanted. The primary end point was clinical success, defined as freedom from procedure-related mortality, persistent type IA endoleak, occlusion or high-grade stenosis (>70%) of CGs, and any chimney technique-related secondary procedure for the entire follow-up period. Secondary clinical success included patients with successful treatment of a primary end point with a secondary endovascular procedure. Results All 244 targeted chimney vessels were successfully cannulated. Total perioperative morbidity was 7.8% (n = 13), including 3 (1.8%) cases of bowel ischemia, 1 (0.6%) patient with renal ischemia, and 1 patient (0.6%) with stroke. Median follow-up was 25.5 ± 2.2 months. Both 30-day and follow-up procedure-related mortality rates were 1.8% (n = 3). Primary and secondary freedom from persistent type IA endoleak rates were 96.4% (n = 159) and 99.4% (n = 164), respectively. Primary and secondary CG patency rates were 92.2% (n = 225) and 95.9% (n = 234), respectively. The rate of reinterventions related to the chimney technique was 10.9% (n = 18), and 83.3% of them were performed by endovascular means. The estimated cumulative primary patency and freedom from persistent type IA endoleak were 87.5% and 95.3%, respectively, and the primary and secondary clinical successes rates at midterm were 80.3% and 87.5%, respectively. Conclusions The elective use of CHEVAR with the Endurant stent graft in our series showed favorable midterm clinical results, which are similar to the published results of other total endovascular modalities. A prospective randomized trial of elective treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic pathologic processes with current endovascular options is needed to assess the value of CHEVAR in the elective setting.

Background The total endovascular approach is in current evolution, and many series have described variable outcomes for branched technology, chimney techniques, or fenestrated repair; and even a combination of some of them. We aim to describe the current outcomes on physician-modified endograft for the treatment of arch diseases. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for this systematic review. The search was applied to MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We used the following search terms in all possible combinations: home-made, physician-modified, surgeon-modified, on-table modification, hand-made, endograft, endovascular, aortic arch, and TEVAR: a thorough search of the English-language literature published until March 2020 was performed to identify studies using physician-modified endograft for the treatment of arch diseases. Only studies with treatment of 3 patients or more and with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were enrolled in the systematic review, whereas case reports were excluded from the analysis. Results Six articles participated in the systematic review after the exclusions, including a total of 239 patients for analysis. Four high-volume centers provided data including a high rate of single fenestrations in zone 2, accounting for nearly 70% of the cases. About 80.3% were males, and 67.4% received urgent treatment mainly for acute/subacute dissection (64.4%). Thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or postdissection arch aneurysm was the second leading cause of treatment with 25.9%. There was a technical success of 93.7% reaching up to 98.3% when additional procedures were performed. The 30-day mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack, paraplegia, and stent-induced new entry rates were 2.9%, 2.1%, 0.4%, and 0.4%, respectively; whereas, overall mortality of the study was 4.6% at a mean follow-up of 33.2 ± 14.8 months. Conclusions Endograft modification for aortic arch diseases' treatment demonstrates to be safe and highly effective, especially for aortic dissections needing single zone 2 fenestrations. Although outcomes achieved in the study seem encouraging, these are achieved at high-volume experienced centers, thus, they need to be judiciously evaluated, whereas proctoring may be a good alternative if one patient may benefit from the technique in an unexperienced center.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury due to the use of iodinated contrast media in various interventional procedures like endovascular aneurysm repair. Its pathophysiology remains mostly unclear. The purpose of the present study was to comparatively study the possible protective role of direct intra-arterial administration of mannitol and acetylcysteine and per os administration of simvastatin in a histopathological level. In the present study, we administered iopromide directly in the infrarenal aorta of 24 New Zealand white rabbits after laparotomy. Animals were divided in four groups of six: G1 received iopromide with no protection, G2 iopromide with mannitol, G3 iopromide with acetylcysteine, and G4 iopromide with simvastatin. Renal function blood parameters were assessed prior to the administration, and in 48 h; histopathological evaluation of the kidneys was performed. CIN was evident only in the no protection group G1. Moreover, G1 demonstrated significantly more severe lesions than groups G2, G3, and G4 regarding histopathological findings in glomeruli, vacuolization of tubular epithelial cells, tubular proteinaceous casts, and tubular necrosis. According to our results, intra-arterial administration of mannitol seems to be effective in protection against tubular necrosis. In general, all three agents demonstrated a protective role in preventing the development of CIN, although it seems that there are various pathways that remain to be investigated further.

Introduction: Neck enlargement is well described in patients treated with self-expandable endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Double endografting (ie, overlapping of stent grafts) occurs in patients with proximal cuffs or bifurcated to monoiliacal configuration conversions. When the aortic neck of patients receives 2 suprarenal fixation endografts, it may behave differently in terms of radial force and interaction of additional suprarenal stents extending to the visceral aorta. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing 2 groups. Group 1 included 18 patients treated with 2 proximal self-expandable endografts. Group 2 included 17 patients treated with 1 self-expandable endograft who were consecutively treated during the period of treatment in group 1. Neck measurements were analyzed in both groups preoperatively and in the last computed tomography scan during follow-up. Suprarenal, interrenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal (at 5 and 10 mm) diameters, as well as interrenal and infrarenal (5 mm) areas, were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, initial neck measurements, and aneurysmal sac evolution including endoleaks between the groups. Both groups showed neck enlargement. Group comparisons of all parameters in posttreatment neck measurements showed no statistical change. Univariate analysis showed oversizing to be significant in interrenal diameter and area and infrarenal at 10 mm diameter; however, 2-way analysis of variance analysis showed that the interaction between oversizing and the number of stent grafts was not significant. Conclusion: Neck enlargement occurs in patients with self-expandable endografts with a tendency to reach the size of the endograft in the long term. Double endografting seems to interact in the same way as simple endografting in the aortic neck. Although the main limitation of our study lies in the small sample size, the presence of an additional “double” stent graft does not appear to result in any differences in aortic neck dilatation when compared to a single stent graft.

The use of and results with the Endurant stent-graft have been reported extensively. However, there has been little if any focus placed on performance and outcomes when a 36-mm-diameter device is used. Data were collected and retrospectively analyzed on EVAR patients treated with a 36-mm-diameter Endurant device at 3 European academic vascular centers between 2007 and 2015. Primary endpoints were the absence of type Ia endoleak in the early and mid-term follow-up period, and aneurysm sac stabilization or shrinkage. Secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality, overall survival and secondary interventions. Subgroup analysis of outcomes in the on-label (ONL) versus off-label (OFL) device use cohorts was also performed. Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 30.1 ± 16.2 months. Mean aortic neck diameter was 29.5 ± 1.9. Primary technical success was achieved in 69 patients (94.5%). Five patients (6.8%) were found to have developed a type Ia endoleak, 3 during the first month, and the other 2 at 2 years. Overall EVAR-related mortality was 4.1% (n = 3). Subgroup analysis focused on the OFL cohort (n = 44) versus the ONL patients (n = 29). Two of the OFL patients (4.5%) had a type Ia endoleak, and 3 (10.3%) in the ONL group. The use of the largest diameter Endurant stent-graft device emerges as a reasonable option for EVAR treatment of AAA featuring a large-diameter proximal neck. Assessment of a larger group of patients followed in the long term will be necessary for a more definitive statement on such strategy.