Search

Aims: A meta‐analysis of short‐term studies revealed no significant differences between the doses of asenapine, 10 and 20 mg/day, in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. However, it should be noted that many patients from clinical practice were excluded, and the dose–response to asenapine in a real‐world setting is still unclear. Additionally, the dose–response in the maintenance phase is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of different asenapine doses in patients with maintenance phase of schizophrenia in a real‐world setting. Methods: This study conducted post‐marketing surveillance of asenapine in clinical settings in Japan. It followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who received asenapine for the first time for a maximum of 52 weeks. These patients were divided into two categories based on their average daily asenapine dosage: ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day. Asenapine efficacy was assessed by adjusting for patient demographics using multivariate logistic regression analysis, employing the Clinical Global Impression‐Global Improvement (CGI‐I) scale, which has seven categories. Results: A total of 2774 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1689 and 1085 patients were treated with asenapine ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day, respectively. The CGI‐I improvement rate was significantly higher in the asenapine >10 group (p = 0.012) after adjusting for patient background factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that asenapine doses >10 mg/day may be more effective than 10 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evidence regarding schizophrenia relapse following acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is sparse compared with that for depression, and we have no clear consensus on relapse proportions. We aimed to provide longitudinal information on schizophrenia relapse following acute ECT., Study Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on post-acute ECT relapse and rehospitalization for schizophrenia and related disorders. For the primary outcome, we calculated the post-acute ECT pooled relapse estimates at each timepoint (3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-acute ECT) using a random effects model. For subgroup analyses, we investigated post-acute ECT relapse proportions by the type of maintenance therapy., Study Results: Among a total of 6413 records, 29 studies (3876 patients) met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was consistently low for all included RCTs (4 studies), although it ranged from low to high for observational studies (25 studies). Pooled estimates of relapse proportions among patients with schizophrenia responding to acute ECT were 24% (95% CI: 15-35), 37% (27-47), 41% (34-49), and 55% (40-69) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. When continuation/maintenance ECT was added to antipsychotics post-acute ECT, the 6-month relapse proportion was 20% (11-32)., Conclusion: Relapse occurred mostly within 6 months post-acute ECT for schizophrenia, particularly within the first 3 months. Relapse proportions plateaued after 6 months, although more than half of all patients could be expected to relapse within 2 years. Further high-quality research is needed to optimise post-acute ECT treatment strategies in patients with schizophrenia., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.)