Search

Many critical concreting activities require the determination of the in-place concrete strength. It can be costly to wait too long to execute these activities, but acting too early can have a negative impact on structural performance. Conventional moulded concrete cylinders and alternative strength assessment methods such as the maturity method are commonly used to assess concrete's in-place strength. This study is focused on a special case when the maturity method is applied for evaluating concrete strength in cold weather at an early age. Specifically, the study proposes an alternative method for calibrating the activation energy, an input for the maturity method. Concretes cured at two different temperatures are used to calibrate the activation energy. The maturity method based on this activation energy predicted the cold weather concrete's compressive strength satisfactorily. It was also found that for a successful application of the proposed activation energy calibration, the two temperatures should represent the expected minimum and maximum temperature at the site. Furthermore, the results showed that the maturity method based on the proposed activation energy calibration method performed better than the conventional cylinder method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate estimation of the in situ strength of concrete at early age is very important as it provides the necessary information required to start subsequent construction operations. Overestimation of the strength may cause serious safety hazards and underestimation may lead to unnecessary costly delays. This study investigates the performance of the maturity method in estimating the strength of in situ concrete subjected to cold weather at early age. Instrumented concrete slabs were subjected to cold weather conditions at early ages and their strengths were measured using drilled core samples from the slab. Sensors embedded in the slabs measured the temperature in the concrete which was used to estimate the strength using the maturity method. The measured core strengths at 24 and 72 h after casting are then compared with the estimated strengths using the maturity method and its performance is evaluated. The core strengths are also compared with the strength of standard cylinders cured at the same condition as the slabs. More than 250 cylinders from two slab thicknesses and four batches of concrete were used in the experiments to obtain statistically significant experimental data. The results show that the maturity method performed much better than the standard cylinder strength. On average the standard cylinder strength underestimated the core strength by more than 40% while the maturity method overestimated the strength by less than 10% with a lower variation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]