Search

Obesity defined by high body mass index (BMI) has traditionally been associated with gastrointestinal inflammatory processes but has recently been correlated with better survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We sought to investigate the association between BMI and immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) outcomes and whether BMI reflects body fat content on abdominal imaging. This retrospective, single-center study included cancer patients with ICI exposure who developed IMDC and had BMI and abdominal computed tomography (CT) obtained within 30 days before initiating ICI from April 2011 to December 2019. BMI was categorized as

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious for treating various malignancies. In addition to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), growing evidence suggests that ICIs might also be associated with diverticulitis. We aim to assess the clinical presentations and management of colonic diverticulitis among cancer patients after ICI treatment.A retrospective study was conducted on ICI-treated adult cancer patients between 01/2010 and 06/2020. Patients were grouped based on when diverticulitis developed relative to ICI treatment, either before (controls) or after (cases). Patient clinical characters, treatment, and outcomes were compared between both groups.77 eligible patients were included: 63 patients developed diverticulitis after ICI exposure (46 had initial episode after ICI exposure, 17 had a history of diverticulitis prior then recurred after ICI exposure), and 14 had diverticulitis before ICI exposure. Diverticulitis occurred after a median of 129 days after ICI initiation. Clinical characteristics overlapped with traditional diverticulitis. 93% of patients had symptom resolution after treatment, while 23.8% experienced complications. These patients exhibited higher rates of hospitalization (87% vs 48%, P = 0.015) and surgery/interventional radiology procedures (27% vs 0, P = 0.002), and worse overall survival (P = 0.022). History of diverticulitis was not associated with a more severe disease course. Immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids) were rarely required unless for concurrent ICI-mediated colitis.Colonic diverticulitis can occur after ICI therapy at very low incidence (0.5%). Its clinical presentation, evaluation, and management are similar to traditional diverticulitis, but associated with higher complication rates requiring surgical intervention and has lower overall survival.

Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are frequently associated with adverse events, often affecting the gastrointestinal tract. We conducted this study to determine the characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with pre-existing microscopic colitis (MC) who underwent ICI treatment. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified 10 patients with pre-existing MC who received ICIs at our center 01/2010-06/2020. Clinical characteristics and disease outcomes were recorded. Results Of 124 screened patients with MC before ICI exposure, 10 had sufficient data to be included in the study. Melanoma (40%) and lung cancer (30%) were the most prevalent cancer types, with 70% of stage IV cancer. Most patients (90%) received anti–programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy. Six patients (60%) had collagenous colitis, and 4 (40%) had lymphocytic colitis. The median time from MC diagnosis to ICI initiation was 4 years, with 1 patient on budesonide within 2 months of ICI initiation. Eight patients (80%) developed colitis exacerbations after ICI requiring selective immunosuppression. One patient received a compassionate-use fecal transplantation. The median time from ICI to colitis exacerbation was 14 days, with 40% and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 colitis, respectively leading to hospitalization in 3 patients. Six patients received steroids and vedolizumab with no colitis recurrence. Of 8 patients who had colitis exacerbation, 6 resumed ICI therapy afterwards; with 5 receiving concomitant vedolizumab for secondary prophylaxis. Conclusion Our findings suggest that ICI exposure increases the risk of exacerbation of underlying colitis necessitating and responding to potent immunosuppression therapy.

A variety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological cancers. However, TKIs are often associated with gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), especially diarrhea. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of TKI-associated lower GI AEs.This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with cancer treated with TKIs from March 2016 to September 2020 who experienced diarrhea without other identifiable causes. Basic and GI AE-related characteristics and outcomes were compared using χOf 2172 patients who received TKIs over the study period, we included 228 in the final analysis. Of these, 166 (72.8%) had hematological cancers. Besides diarrhea, GI symptoms included nausea (36.4%), vomiting (21.9%), abdominal pain (15.4%), and bleeding (3.1%). Symptoms were typically mild, with 209 patients (91.7%) presenting with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1-2 diarrhea. Only 5 patients (2.2%) received immunosuppressants for diarrhea treatment, 83 (36.4%) received no treatment, 29 (12.7%) received antibiotics, 101 (44.3%) received supportive antidiarrheal medications, and 17 patients (7.5%) needed TKI dose reduction or cessation of TKI use. When compared with patients with hematological cancers, those with solid tumors had a higher rate of hospitalization (29.0% vs. 7.2%; p 0.001) and mortality (75.8% vs. 43.4%; p 0.001) but a lower rate of recurrence of GI AEs (21.0% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.003. Only 15 patients (6.6%) underwent colonoscopy, with normal endoscopic findings in 8 patients (53.3%) and nonulcerative inflammation in 5 patients (33.3%). The inflammation universally involved the left colon. Twelve of the 15 patients who underwent colonoscopy had active colitis. In the hematological cancer group, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had a lower GI AE recurrence rate than did patients with other hematological cancers (7.2% vs. 30.1%; p = 0.001).Ten percent of cancer patients receiving TKIs experienced lower GI AEs, which were usually mild. Symptoms TKI-related GI adverse effects were nonspecific, often overlapping those of other cancer therapy-related GI AEs. Treatment of GI AEs was largely supportive, with limited roles for antibiotics and immunosuppressants.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy can be complicated by gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs). Similarly, gastrointestinal AEs have been reported with the use of serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor therapy. We investigated the characteristics and management of gastrointestinal AEs related to sequential ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.We identified 255 adult cancer patients who received both BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy and ICI therapy between 2014 and 2021. Thirty-two eligible patients had gastrointestinal AEs after receiving both therapies and were categorized based on the order of their administration. Their clinical characteristics, evaluation, treatment and outcomes were compared.Of the 32 eligible patients, 18 (56.3%) received ICI therapy followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors (early ICI group), and 14 (44.8%) received BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy followed by ICI (early BRAF/MEK inhibitor group). Compared with the early BRAF/MEK inhibitor group, the early ICI group had higher rates of grade 3-4 diarrhea (50.0% vs. 14.3%, P=0.047) and grade 3-4 colitis (38.9% vs. 0%, P=0.010). The early ICI group had a later onset of colitis (347.5 vs. 84.5 days, P=0.011) and a higher rate of hospitalization at initial colitis presentation (100% vs. 71.4%, P=0.028). Patients in the early ICI group were more likely to have diarrhea or colitis recurrence (69.2% vs. 9.1%, P=0.019) and re-hospitalization for colitis (38.9% vs. 0%, P=0.010).The sequential exposure of BRAF/MEK therapy after ICI may contribute to a more aggressive clinical profile of gastrointestinal toxicities that may warrant a more aggressive management strategy.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective against various malignancies. However, adverse events including diarrhea and colitis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Recommendations include steroids and biologic treatment. Given their associated risks, this study evaluated the role of non-immunosuppressive agents e.g. mesalamine and or cholestyramine in the management of diarrhea and colitis.Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of adults who developed ICI diarrhea and colitis between 2010 through 2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between those treated with the non-immunosuppressive therapies mesalamine and/or cholestyramine alone versus those who received additional immunosuppression with steroids and biologics.Results: Our sample comprised 66 patients wherein, the mean age was 63 years, 71% were male, and 97% had stage III /IV cancers. Fourteen patients were treated successfully with non-immunosuppressive therapy. They had grade 1-3 diarrhea and 1-2 colitis with no difference in rate of histologic colitis compared to those who received immunosuppressive therapy. They had less CTLA-4 inhibitor-based therapy (36% vs 73%, P=0.034), delayed onset of symptoms (159 vs 64 days, P=0.011), lower fecal calprotectin levels (56 vs 234, P= 0.012) and were more likely to resume ICI therapy (64% vs 25%, P=0.006). Conclusion: Mesalamine and/or cholestyramine may be effective for mild ICI diarrhea and colitis among patients with delayed symptom onset with lower colonic inflammatory burden. Prospective studies randomizing patients with mild colitis between mesalamine/cholestyramine and immunosuppressive treatment are warranted to assess their efficacy and safety.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective against various malignancies. However, adverse events including diarrhea and colitis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Recommendations for the management of ICI mediated diarrhea and colitis include steroids and biologics. Given their associated risks, this study evaluated the role of the non-immunosuppressive agents, mesalamine and or cholestyramine.This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of adults who developed ICI diarrhea and colitis between 2010 and 2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between those treated with the non-immunosuppressive therapies mesalamine and/or cholestyramine alone versus those who received additional immunosuppression with steroids and biologics.Our sample comprised 66 patients wherein, the mean age was 63 years, 71% were males, and 97% had stage III/IV cancers. Fourteen patients were treated successfully with non-immunosuppressive therapy. They had grade 1-3 diarrhea and 1-2 colitis with no difference in the rate of histologic colitis compared to those who received immunosuppressive therapy. They had less CTLA-4 inhibitor-based therapy (36% vs. 73%, p = 0.034), delayed onset of symptoms (159 vs. 64 days, p = 0.011), lower fecal calprotectin levels (56 vs. 234, p = 0.012) and were more likely to resume ICI therapy (64% vs. 25%, p = 0.006).Mesalamine and/or cholestyramine may be effective for mild ICI diarrhea and colitis among patients with delayed symptom onset with lower colonic inflammatory burden. Prospective studies randomizing patients with mild colitis between mesalamine/cholestyramine and immunosuppressive treatment are warranted to assess their efficacy and safety.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are known to cause immune-related adverse events (irAE) with the gastrointestinal (GI) tract among the most affected. Our knowledge of GI irAE in patients with luminal GI malignancies is poor. We aimed to characterize the incidence, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of these GI irAEs.This was a retrospective study of patients with malignancies involving the luminal GI tract and GI irAEs at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2010 to June 2020. Clinical data were collected and analyzed.Eighteen patients with luminal GI tract malignancies treated with ICIs had evidence of GI irAEs based on clinical symptoms and/or histology. The predominant GI irAE symptom was diarrhea (78%). Ten had non-ulcerative inflammation (56%) and 5 had ulcerative inflammation (28%) on endoscopy. Histologically, 3 patients (17%) had evidence of acute inflammation, 4 (22%) had chronic inflammation, and 9 (50%) had both. Ten patients (56%) received immunosuppressant treatment, which included steroids alone (n=2, 20%), steroids with biologics (infliximab or vedolizumab) (n=7, 70%), or biologics alone (n=1, 10%), with clinical remission in all cases. Of the 6 patients who previously had stable or ICI-responsive cancer and received immunosuppressants, none developed progression of GI luminal malignancy during the study period.GI irAEs occurred in 2.4% of patients treated with ICI for cancer involving the luminal GI tract. Immunosuppressant therapies (e.g., vedolizumab) appear to be effective for GI irAEs, showing no association with further GI luminal cancer progression, recurrence, or a subsequent poor response to ICI therapy.