Search

Background: Extending adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) to 7-10 years decreases the risk of relapse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, such benefit comes at the price of higher incidence of skeletal and cardiovascular (CV) events. Biomarkers predicting such toxicities might help clinicians in tailoring adjuvant ET to patient’s needs. We conducted a prospective study to assess whether SNPs in the gene encoding for the aromatase enzyme (CYP19A1) affect the risk of skeletal and CV events in HR+ early BC patients enrolled in the GIM4 trial. Methods: The GIM4 trial randomized HR+ BC postmenopausal patients who had been already treated with 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen to either 3-2 years or 5 years of adjuvant letrozole. Four SNPs of CYP19A1 were evaluated: rs10046, rs4646, rs479292 and rs727479. SNPs were genotyped through PCR on DNA obtained from patients’ peripheral blood samples. Skeletal and CV events were assessed from randomization in the GIM4 trial to last follow-up, disease recurrence or death. Skeletal events were defined as the onset of osteoporosis or bone fractures. CV events were defined as the onset of thrombosis, embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, hearth failure, or arrythmia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between SNPs and skeletal and CV events. Bonferroni correction for multiplicity was used for univariate SNPs association tests, with a corrected alpha of 0.012. Only associations with an alpha level Citation Format: Benedetta Conte, Chiara Molinelli, Giancarlo Bisagni, Antonio Durando, Giovanni Sanna, Stefania Gori, Ornella Garrone, Stefano Tamberi, Sabino De Placido, Francesco Schettini, Antonio Pazzola, Riccardo Ponzone, Filippo Montemurro, Gianluigi Lunardi, Rosario Notaro, Anna Turletti, Claudia Bighin, Francesca Poggio, Giulia Buzzatti, Matteo Lambertini, Luca Boni, Lucia Del Mastro. Single nucletotide polymorphisms of aromatase gene (CYP19A1) and toxicity of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: A translational, prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-03.

The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.

Summary Background The benefit of extending aromatase inhibitor therapy beyond 5 years in the context of previous aromatase inhibitors remains controversial. We aimed to compare extended therapy with letrozole for 5 years versus the standard duration of 2–3 years of letrozole in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who have already received 2–3 years of tamoxifen. Methods This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was done at 69 hospitals in Italy. Women were eligible if they were postmenopausal at the time of study entry, had stage I–III histologically proven and operable invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, had received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for at least 2 years but no longer than 3 years and 3 months, had no signs of disease recurrence, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2–3 years (control group) or 5 years (extended group) of letrozole (2·5 mg orally once a day). Randomisation, with stratification by centre, with permuted blocks of size 12, was done with a centralised, interactive, internet-based system that randomly generated the treatment allocation. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analysis was done for patients who received at least 1 month of study treatment. This trial was registered with EudraCT, 2005-001212-44, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01064635. Findings Between Aug 1, 2005, and Oct 24, 2010, 2056 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive letrozole for 2–3 years (n=1030; control group) or for 5 years (n=1026; extended group). After a median follow-up of 11·7 years (IQR 9·5–13·1), disease-free survival events occurred in 262 (25·4%) of 1030 patients in the control group and 212 (20·7%) of 1026 in the extended group. 12-year disease-free survival was 62% (95% CI 57–66) in the control group and 67% (62–71) in the extended group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·65–0·93; p=0·0064). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were arthralgia (22 [2·2%] of 983 patients in the control group vs 29 [3·0%] of 977 in the extended group) and myalgia (seven [0·7%] vs nine [0·9%]). There were three (0·3%) serious treatment-related adverse events in the control group and eight (0·8%) in the extended group. No deaths related to toxic effects were observed. Interpretation In postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who received 2–3 years of tamoxifen, extended treatment with 5 years of letrozole resulted in a significant improvement in disease-free survival compared with the standard 2–3 years of letrozole. Sequential endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for 2–3 years followed by letrozole for 5 years should be considered as one of the optimal standard endocrine treatments for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Funding Novartis and the Italian Ministry of Health. Translation For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Background/Aim: Axillary surgery of breast cancer patients is undergoing a paradigm shift, as axillary lymph node dissection’s (ALND) usefulness is being questioned in the treatment of patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The aim of this study was to investigate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with positive SLNB treated with ALND or not. Patients and Methods: We investigated 617 consecutive patients with cN0 operable breast cancer with positive SLNB undergoing mastectomy or conservative surgery. A total of 406 patients underwent ALND and 211 were managed expectantly. Results: No significant difference in OS and RFS was found between the two groups. The incidence of loco-regional recurrence in the SLNB-only group and the ALND group was low and not significant. Conclusion: The type of breast cancer surgery and the omission of ALND does not improve OS or RSF rate in cases with metastatic SLN.

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care in high-risk early breast cancer patients. However, its role in HER2-positive patients is still uncertain. In this exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial, we investigated the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with or without exposure to trastuzumab. In the GIM2 trial, node-positive early breast cancer patients were randomized to receive 4 cycles of (fluorouracil)epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel administered every 2 (dose-dense) or 3 (standard-interval) weeks. After approval of adjuvant trastuzumab, protocol was amended in April 2006 to allow use of trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy completion in HER2-positive patients. The efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed according to HER2 status and trastuzumab use. Out of 2,003 breast cancer patients, HER2 status was negative/unknown in 1,551 patients; among the 452 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, chemotherapy alone or followed by trastuzumab was given to 320 and 132 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 8.1 years. No significant interaction between HER2 status, trastuzumab use and chemotherapy treatment was observed for both DFS (p=0.698) and OS (p=0.708). Nevertheless, there was no apparent benefit in the HER2-positive group treated with trastuzumab (DFS: HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.52-1.89; OS: HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.37-2.41). Although dose-dense chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival improvement in high-risk breast cancer patients, its benefit appeared to be smaller (if any) in patients with HER2-positive disease who received adjuvant trastuzumab. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background/aim Axillary surgery of breast cancer patients is undergoing a paradigm shift, as axillary lymph node dissection's (ALND) usefulness is being questioned in the treatment of patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The aim of this study was to investigate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with positive SLNB treated with ALND or not. Patients and methods We investigated 617 consecutive patients with cN0 operable breast cancer with positive SLNB undergoing mastectomy or conservative surgery. A total of 406 patients underwent ALND and 211 were managed expectantly. Results No significant difference in OS and RFS was found between the two groups. The incidence of loco-regional recurrence in the SLNB-only group and the ALND group was low and not significant. Conclusion The type of breast cancer surgery and the omission of ALND does not improve OS or RSF rate in cases with metastatic SLN.

Background No evidence exists to recommend a specific chemotherapy regimen in young breast cancer patients. We performed a pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients and its impact on the risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea. Patients and methods In the MIG1 study, node-positive or high-risk node-negative patients were randomised to 6 cycles of fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (dose-dense) or 3 (standard-interval) weeks. In the GIM2 study, node-positive patients were randomised to 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval EC or FEC followed by 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval paclitaxel. Using individual patient data, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival by means of a Cox proportional hazards model and the odds ratio for treatment-induced amenorrhoea through a logistic regression model were calculated for each study. A meta-analysis of the two studies was performed using the random effect model to compute the parameter estimates. Results A total of 1,549 patients were included. Dose-dense chemotherapy was associated with a significant improved overall survival as compared to standard-interval chemotherapy (HR, 0.71; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.54–0.95; p = 0.021). The pooled HRs were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54–1.12) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40–1.06) for patients with hormone receptor-positive and -negative tumours, respectively (interaction p = 0.330). No increased risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea was observed with dose-dense chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80–1.25; p = 0.989). Conclusion Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered the preferred treatment option in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients.

504 Background: The effect of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) after sequential ET with tamoxifen (Tam) followed by AI for 5 years is still controversial. We conduct a clinical trial to assess different durations of ET of letrozole after tam. Methods: The GIM4 LEAD (Gruppo Italiano Mammella 4- Letrozole adjuvant therapy duration study, ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01064635 ) was a prospective, randomized, Italian multicentric trial. Post-menopausal patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer free of recurrence after 2-3 years of adjuvant tam, were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-2 years (short arm, S) or 5 years (long arm, L) of letrozole. The primary study end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Between August 2005 and May 2010, 2056 pts were randomly assigned to receive 3-2 years (n=1030) or 5 years (n=1026) of letrozole. Main patients characteristics in the S and L arms were, respectively: median age 60 vs 61 years, node negative 56 vs 56%, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy 53.4 vs 54.1%. The median follow-up was 10 years (IQR range: 8.6-11.4). The 8-year DFS was 80% (95% CI:77.3-82.7) and 85% (95% CI:82.9-87.6) in the S and L arm, respectively (hazard ratio, HR 0.82; 95% CI:0.68-0.98; p=0.031). This effect did not change in a multivariate Cox model that included nodal status, grading and age. No evidence of interaction between random assignment and nodal status, age and grading was observed. Among 1960 pts evaluable for toxicity, osteoporosis was diagnosed in 47 (4.8%) in S arm and 81 (8.3%) pts in L arm (chi-square=9.88; p=0.002). Bone fractures occurred in 5 (0.5%) and 9 (0.9%) pts in S and L arm, respectively ( p=0.29, Fisher exact test). Conclusions: After 2-3 years of adjuvant tam, extended treatment with 5 years of letrozole resulted in significant improvement in DFS compared to the standard duration of 2-3 years of letrozole. Clinical trial information: NCT01064635.

Background: There is strong evidence that VEGF plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of human breast cancer. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody, specifically inhibits VEGF. The combination of first-line bevacizumab with chemotherapy significantly improved the activity in comparison to chemotherapy alone in three randomized phase III trials in metastatic breast cancer patients (pts). In early breast cancer, the FEC→Paclitaxel regimen is a highly active standard therapy. Therefore we initiated a trial to evaluate the combination of bevacizumab with this efficacious chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of stage III or inflammatory early breast cancer (LABC). Patients and Methods: The study is designed to evaluate a sequential regimen of FEC90 followed by the combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced (stage III or inflammatory) breast cancer. Patients are treated with neoadjuvant FEC 600/90/600 mg/m2 q21d x 4, followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly x 12 combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q2w x 6. Patients undergo surgery 4 weeks after completing chemotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR), the primary endpoint, is defined as no evidence of invasive tumor in the final surgical sample both in the breast and axilla. Secondary endpoints include objective clinical response rate (RR), disease-free interval, overall survival, rate of breast-conserving surgery, and the safety of the regimen. Results: Between Feb 2008 and Dec 2009, 54 pts (mean age of 51±7.5 years) were enrolled into the study. To date, 32 pts have completed neoadjuvant treatment and surgery and are evaluable for response. Baseline characteristics in these 32 patients were as follows: cT3/cT4b: 20 (63%) and/or cN2/cN3: 14 (43%); estrogen receptor (ER) positive: 24 (75%) and 8 (25%) triple-negative (TN), defined as ER negative, progesterone receptor-(PgR-) negative, and HER2 negative. Histological type was ductal carcinoma in 24 patients (75%), lobular carcinoma in 4 (13%), inflammatory breast cancer in 1 (3%), and other in 3 (9%). Mastectomy was performed in 22 patients (69%) and breast-conserving surgery in 10 patients (31%). After neoadjuvant treatment, 8/32 patients (25%) achieved a pCR. Conclusions: This open-label, multicenter, phase II study demonstrated that the FEC→Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab combination is a highly active neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced breast cancer. A 25% of pCR in this group of pts with high tumor burden, i.e. the LABC, is oneof the most promising chemotherapeutic regimen if confirmed in the final analyis. Results for all 54 pts enrolled will be presented at the meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-20.

MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) is considered an onco-microRNA given its abilities to suppress the actions of several tumor suppressor genes and to promote tumor cell growth, invasion and metastasis. Recently, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is found to up-regulate the expression of miR-21, and elevated miR-21 expression is seen frequently in breast cancer. To evaluate the effect of miR-21 on disease progression and its association with TGF-beta, we analyzed miR-21 expression in breast cancer. Fresh tumor samples were collected during surgery from 344 patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer. The expression of miR-21 in tumor samples was measured with a TaqMan microRNA assay using U6 as reference. Levels of miR-21 expression by disease stage, tumor grade, histology, hormone receptor status and lymph node involvement were compared. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to assess the association of miR-21 expression with disease-free and overall survival. The study results showed that the expression of miR-21 was detected in all tumor samples with substantial variation. High miR-21 expression was associated with features of aggressive disease, including high tumor grade, negative hormone receptor status, and ductal carcinoma. High miR-21 was also positively correlated with TGF-beta1. No associations were found between patient survival and miR-21 expression among all patients, but high miR-21 was associated with poor disease-free survival in early stage patients (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.08-4.00) despite no value for prognosis. The study supports the notion that miR-21 is an onco-microRNA for breast cancer. Elevated miR-21 expression may facilitate tumor progression, and TGF-beta may up-regulate its expression.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)-mediated signals play complicated roles in the development and progression of breast tumour. The purposes of this study were to analyse the genotype of TGF-beta1 at T29C and TGF-beta1 phenotype in breast tumours, and to evaluate their associations with IGFs and clinical characteristics of breast cancer. Fresh tumour samples were collected from 348 breast cancer patients. TGF-beta1 genotype and phenotype were analysed with TaqMan and ELISA, respectively. Members of the IGF family in tumour tissue were measured with ELISA. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to assess the association of TGF-beta1 and disease outcomes. Patients with the T/T (29%) genotype at T29C had the highest TGF-beta1, 707.9 pg mg(-1), followed by the T/C (49%), 657.8 pg mg(-1), and C/C (22%) genotypes, 640.8 pg mg(-1), (P=0.210, T/T vs C/C and C/T). TGF-beta1 concentrations were positively correlated with levels of oestrogen receptor, IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3. Survival analysis showed TGF-beta1 associated with disease progression, but the association differed by disease stage. For early-stage disease, patients with the T/T genotype or high TGF-beta1 had shorter overall survival compared to those without T/T or with low TGF-beta1; the hazard ratios (HR) were 3.54 (95% CI: 1.21-10.40) for genotype and 2.54 (95% CI: 1.10-5.89) for phenotype after adjusting for age, grade, histotype and receptor status. For late-stage disease, however, the association was different. The T/T genotype was associated with lower risk of disease recurrence (HR=0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-1.00), whereas no association was found between TGF-beta1 phenotype and survival outcomes. The study suggests a complex role of TGF-beta1 in breast cancer progression, which supports the finding of in vitro studies that TGF-beta1 has conflicting effects on tumour growth and metastasis.

The study was designed to compare an anthracycline-containing regimen to a regimen combining both anthracycline and paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer patients. In this multicenter, randomized phase-III trial, node-positive early breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive either 6 cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks) or 4 cycles of EP (epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included toxicity and event-free survival (EFS). From 1996 to 2001, 1055 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 12.8 years, 335 deaths had been recorded. The 10-year OS was 73 % (95 % CI 69-77) in the FEC arm and 74 % (95 % CI 70-78) in the EP arm (p = 0.405). The 10-year EFS was 51 % (95 % CI 45-56) in the FEC arm and 49 % (95 % CI 44-55) in the EP arm (p = 0.572). No difference in the hazard of death was observed (HR for EP 0.85, 95 % CI 0.68-1.06, p = 0.15). Patients treated with FEC experienced more frequently nausea and vomiting, stomatitis, and leukopenia as compared to patients treated with EP. Toxicities which occurred more frequently with EP were anemia, fever, myalgias, and neurotoxicity. Our study failed to demonstrate a superiority of an adjuvant treatment with four EP as compared to six FEC in node -positive breast cancer patients.

Background Whether addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (EC-P) is favourable in adjuvant treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer is controversial, as is the benefit of increased density of dosing. We aimed to address these questions in terms of improvements in disease-free survival. Methods In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node positive, early-stage breast cancer from 81 Italian centres. Eligible patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio with a centralised, interactive online system to receive either dose-dense chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim support) with fluorouracil plus EC-P (FEC-P) or EC-P or to receive standard-interval chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) with FEC-P or EC-P. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival, assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method in the intention-to-treat population. Our primary comparisons were between dose schedule (every 2 weeks vs every 3 weeks) and dose type (FEC-P vs EC-P). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433420. Findings Between April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, we recruited 2091 patients. 88 patients were enrolled in centres that only provided standard-intensity dosing. After a median follow-up of 7·0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4·5-6·3), 140 (26%) of 545 patients given EC-P every 3 weeks, 157 (29%) of 544 patients given FEC-P every 3 weeks, 111 (22%) of 502 patients given EC-P every 2 weeks, and 113 (23%) of 500 patients given FEC-P every 2 weeks had a disease-free survival event. For the dose-density comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 81% (95% CI 79-84) in patients treated every 2 weeks and 76% (74-79) in patients treated every 3 weeks (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·92; p=0·004); overall survival rates at 5 years were 94% (93-96) and 89% (87-91; HR 0·65, 0·51-0·84; p=0·001) and for the chemotherapy-type comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 78% (75-81) in the FEC-P groups and 79% (76-82) in the EC-P groups (HR 1·06, 0·89-1·25; p=0·561); overall survival rates at 5 years were 91% (89-93) and 92% (90-94; 1·16, 0·91-1·46; p=0·234). Compared with 3 week dosing, chemotherapy every 2 weeks was associated with increased rate of grade 3-4 of anaemia (14 [1·4%] of 988 patients vs two [0·2%] of 984 patients; p=0·002); transaminitis (19 [1·9%] vs four [0·4%]; p=0·001), and myalgias (31 [3·1%] vs 16 [1·6%]; p=0·019), and decreased rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (147 [14·9%] vs 433 [44·0%]; p

We sought to describe patterns of treatment and clinical outcome in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressing on trastuzumab-based therapy. One hundred eighty-four consecutive HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients received trastuzumab-based therapy between September 1999 and September 2004. Patients were followed up until death or May 2005. For patients progressing on trastuzumab-based therapy, we calculated the response rate (RR) to the first post-progression treatment, overall survival (OS) from the first administration of trastuzumab, time to second progression (TT-SP), and post-progression survival (PPS), according to treatment. At the time of this analysis, 132 patients had progressed on trastuzumab-based therapy, and 89 had died. Of the progressing patients, 21 experienced rapid progression and could not receive additional anticancer treatments;40 patients continued trastuzumab either alone (12 patients with isolated central nervous system progression), with chemotherapy (23 patients), or with endocrine therapy (5 patients); and 71 stopped trastuzumab and received chemotherapy (61 patients) or endocrine therapy (10 patients) as the first post-progression treatment. Excluding patients with rapid progression, clinical outcomes were similar whether trastuzumab was continued or not, in terms of RR (18% and 27%, respectively), OS (31 and 30 months, respectively), TT-SP (6 and 7 months, respectively), and PPS (21 and 19 months, respectively). The clinical outcome of patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab-based therapy might not be influenced by continuing trastuzumab. The optimal therapeutic strategy in this setting of patients needs evaluation in randomized trials.

Background Neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy is frequently administered in breast cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates vary according to clinical disease stage and biology of breast cancer. The critical role of angiogenesis in the progression of breast cancer, together with significantly improved efficacy when bevacizumab is combined with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, provides a strong rationale for evaluating the integration of bevacizumab into neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Methods A single-arm, multicentre, phase II, open-label study evaluated four 3-weekly cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2 , epirubicin 90 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 ) followed by 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-negative stage III locally advanced or inflammatory breast carcinoma. The primary endpoint was pCR rate. Results Planned treatment was completed in 49 of the 56 enrolled patients. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 21% and the clinical response rate was 59%. Breast-conserving surgery was achieved in 34% of patients. In the subgroup of 15 patients with triple-negative disease, the pCR rate was 47%. Grade 3 adverse events in ≥5% of patients were neutropenia, leucopenia, asthenia, and rash. One case each of hypertensive retinopathy and post-operative wound complication, both after treatment completion, were considered probably related to bevacizumab. There were no treatment-related deaths and no cardiac function abnormalities. Conclusions This study indicates that FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab is an active neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced breast cancer, with no major safety concerns. Clinical trial registration NCT00559845.

Data currently available are insufficient to demonstrate a real utility for CA 15-3 in the diagnosis, staging or surveillance of breast cancer patients following primary treatment. The aim of this study was to determine if there was a correlation between supranormal CA 15-3 serum levels and clinical and biological variables in breast cancer patients at first disease relapse. From October 1988 to March 1998, 430 consecutive patients entered the study. Overall CA 15-3 sensitivity was 60.7%. Elevated CA 15-3 levels were found more frequently in patients with liver metastases (74.6%) and in those with pleural effusion (75.7%). CA 15-3 sensitivity was 70.4% in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) primary tumors and 45.9% in those with estrogen-receptor-negative (ER-) tumors (p0.0001). In patients with a limited extent of disease, marker sensitivity was 57.7% in ER+ tumors and 25.7% in ER- tumors (p0.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed ER status, disease extent and pleural effusion as independent variables associated with CA 15-3 positivity. The multivariate Cox analysis showed ER and disease extent as independent variables predicting overall survival, whereas CA 15-3 failed to be statistically significant. CA 15-3 was an independent variable only when the disease extent variable was removed. This study suggests that CA 15-3 in advanced breast cancer patients is a marker of both disease extent and ER status. The direct relationship with ER status indicates that CA 15-3 diagnostic sensitivity in the early detection of disease recurrence could be greater in ER+ patients than in ER- ones. Furthermore, this suggests that patients with elevated CA 15-3 levels could have disease that is more sensitive to hormone manipulation than those with normal CA 15-3 values.

The lymph node status is still regarded as the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, the utility of axillary lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer as a therapeutic approach rather than a pathologic staging procedure has been recently discussed. DNA index (DI) and S-phase fraction (SPF), evaluated by flow cytometric analysis, are two prognostic factors used especially in the assessment of the adjuvant therapy in stage N0 tumors. By studying a large number of cases, the authors aimed to assess the potential role of flow cytometry in predicting lymph node status. Two hundred eleven patients with breast cancer were included. Each tumor specimen was freshly analyzed by flow cytometry to assess DI and SPF. The authors also evaluated TNM status of patients, estrogen- and progesterone-receptor (ER and Pgr) status, and histologic grades. A group of patients with negative axillary lymph nodes was identified by means of association of tumor size of 2 cm or less, DI of 1, and SPF less than 7%. The ER and PgR status as well as histologic grade were significantly more favorable in this group of patients. These findings indicate that association of DI, SPF value, and tumor size may be predictive of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer.

Background The group of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers (both luminal-A and -B) behaves differently from the ER-negative group. At least in early follow-up, ER expression influences positively patients' prognosis. This low aggressive biology flattens out the differences of clinical management. Thus we aimed to produce a prognostic index specific for ER-positive (ERPI) cancers that could be of aid for clinical decision. Patients and methods The test set comprised 495 consecutive ER-positive breast cancers. Tumor size, number of metastatic lymph nodes and androgen receptor expression were the only independent variables related to disease-specific survival. These variables were used to create the ERPI, which was applied to the entire test set and to selected subpopulations (grade 2 (G2)-tumors, luminal-A and -B breast cancers). A series of 581 ER-positive breast cancers, collected from another hospital, was used to validate ERPI. Results In the test population, 96.9% of patients classified as ERPI-good showed a good prognosis compared with 79.6% classified as ERPI-poor (P < 0.001). ERPI effectively discriminated outcome in luminal-A and luminal-B and in G2-tumors. In the validation series, the ERPI maintained its value. Conclusion ERPI is a practical tool in refining the prediction of outcome of patients with ER-positive breast cancer.

International audience; The purpose of this article is to evaluate the prognostic value of androgen receptor (AR) expression in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy, with or without the addition of chemotherapy. A consecutive series of 953 patients with ER-positive breast cancer, treated between 1998 and 2003, was selected. Repeated immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of ER in the tumor of 938 patients. AR expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. The Kaplan–Meier method, logrank test and multivariate Cox models were used to explore the impact of AR expression on time to relapse (TTR) and disease specific survival (DSS) in all patients and in subgroups treated with chemo-endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone. AR immunoreactivity was assessable in 859 tumors and positive in 609 (70.9%). AR expression was a significant marker of good prognosis for TTR ( = 0.001) and DSS (

Background. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we compared the efficacy of two different schedules of chemotherapy (CT), dose-dense (DD) every 2 weeks versus standard duration every 3 weeks and the role of Fluorouracil (F) in addition to EC, in the adjuvant treatment of node positive BC pts. Patients and Methods. Node positive early BC pts younger than 70 years were eligible and randomly assigned to one of the following treatment arms: ARM A (4 courses of EC [90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 21] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 21]); ARM B (4 courses of FEC [600/90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 21] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 21]); ARM C (4 courses of EC [90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 14] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 14]); ARM D (4 courses of FEC [600/90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 14] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 14]). Pts enrolled in the DD arms (ARM C and D) received subcutaneous pegfilgrastim (6 mg) 24 hours after CT. HER2-positive pts enrolled after April 2006 received trastuzumab for 1 year at the end of CT. The primary study endpoint was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results. From April 2003 to July 2006, 2091 pts were enrolled (545 in ARM A, 544 in ARM B, 502 in ARM C, 500 in ARM D). The planned number of CT cycles was completed in 89% of pts in the DD group and in 88.1% of pts in the standard duration group. Pts treated with DD CT (ARM C + ARM D) experienced more frequently anemia (all grades: 67.2% vs 49.5%, p < .0001; G3-G4: 0.2% vs 1.4%, p = .004) and bone pain (53.5% vs 39.2%, p < .0001). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in standard duration arms (ARM A + ARM B): 66.7% vs 28.0%, p = < .0001. At a median follow up of 7.0 years, multivariate analysis, showed that DD treatments (ARM C + ARM D vs ARM A + ARM B) improved the primary endpoint, DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; p = .007), and OS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = .002). Conversely, the addition of F to EC did not improve clinical outcomes: the HR for DFS and OS (ARM A + ARM C vs ARM B + ARM D) were respectively 0.98 (95% CI 0.83-1.17; p = .85) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.73-1.19; p = .578). Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefits associated with DD CT were independent of hormone receptor status: in hormone receptor positive the HRs for DFS and OS were 0.80 (0.65-0.98) and 0.69 (0.51-0.93) respectively; in hormone receptor negative the HRs for DFS and OS were 0.67 (0.47-0.95) and 0.57 (0.36-0.92) respectively (p for interaction for DFS: 0.339; p for interaction for OS: 0.495). Pathological tumor size, nodal status (1-3 vs ≥ 4 positive nodes), histological grade and hormone receptor status were independently associate with DFS and OS. Conclusions. DD CT as adjuvant treatment in node positive BC pts, improves DFS and OS significantly. Conversely, the addition of F to EC does not improve clinical outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433420). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S5-06.

The clinical significance of micropapillary growth pattern in ductal carcinoma in situ is controversial and the impact of nuclear grading in terms of recurrence of this lesion is yet to be clarified. Our aim was to evaluate, on a series of micropapillary in situ carcinomas, the histological features correlated with recurrence and whether the micropapillary subtype had a different behavior from other non-micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ. We collected 55 cases of micropapillary in situ carcinomas from four institutions. All cases were reviewed for nuclear grade, extent, necrosis, microinvasion and tested for estrogen and progesterone receptors, Ki67, HER2, EGFR and p53 expression. Clinical data, type of surgery and follow up were obtained for all patients. Our results showed that the nuclear grade is crucial in determining the biology of micropapillary carcinoma in situ, so that the high nuclear grade micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ more frequently overexpressed HER2, showed higher proliferation index, displayed necrosis and microinvasion and was more extensive than low/intermediate nuclear grade. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the high nuclear grade (Odds ratio: 6.86; CI: 1.40–33.57) as the only parameter associated with elevated risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. However, the recurrence rate of 19 micropapillary carcinoma in situ, which were part of a cohort of 338 consecutive ductal carcinoma in situ, was significantly higher (log-rank test, P-value=0.019) than that of non-micropapillary, independently of the nuclear grade. In conclusion, although nuclear grade may significantly influence the biological behavior of micropapillary ductal carcinoma in situ, micropapillary growth pattern per se represents a risk factor for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.

Background Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer whose disease has become resistant to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab can benefit from lapatinib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor/HER2 tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor. Before the availability of this compound, trastuzumab was often continued beyond disease progression, usually in addition to further chemotherapy, an approach which was not based on randomized studies. We sought to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes of patients who, upon progression during an initial trastuzumab-based regimen, stopped or continued trastuzumab in addition to further chemotherapy. Patients and Methods From the clinical records of 407 patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, we identified 279 patients progressing during an initial trastuzumab-based treatment. Of these patients, 83 continued trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy, and 112 received chemotherapy alone. Results We found no difference in response rate (28% vs. 30%; P = .5), median time to second tumor progression (8.4 months vs. 7 months; P = .24), or median postprogression survival (20.6 months and 15.4 months; P = .29) according to whether patients continued or stopped trastuzumab. At multivariate analysis, continuation of trastuzumab was associated with a statistically insignificant trend toward reduced risk of second progression (hazard ratio, 0.753; P = .08). Conclusion Patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer developing tumor progression during an initial trastuzumab-based regimen did not seem to benefit significantly from the continuation of trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy. For these patients, there is evidence from a large randomized trial that effective HER2 targeting can be accomplished by inhibiting the HER2 TK activity with lapatinib.

Summary We evaluated whether concurrent radiotherapy (RT) affected delivery and toxicity of adjuvant intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) in women with operable breast cancer. The medical charts of 321 consecutive breast cancer patients who received CMF either alone for 6 cycles, or for 4 cycles following of an anthracycline (A-CMF) were reviewed. One hundred forty-four women underwent radiotherapy concurrently with CMF. Optimal CMF delivery (success as opposite to failure) was defined as the combined achievement of an average relative dose intensity (aRDI) ≥85% and an average percent of the total dose (aPTD) ≥90% for the three drugs in the CMF regimen. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent-RT did not affect CMF delivery (OR for success 1.391 p=0.230). The sequential A-CMF regimen (OR for success 0.208, 95% C.I. 0.120-0.360, p

The primary objective of study is to evaluate cardiac safety of trastuzumab in combination with epirubicin and docetaxel. HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled in a two-stage, multicenter phase II trial with weekly trastuzumab (4 and then 2 mg/kg) with epirubicin and docetaxel (either 75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 3 weeks. After eight courses of chemotherapy, trastuzumab was continued as a single agent. To assess cardiotoxicity, patients were evaluated for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline, every two cycles during chemotherapy and trastuzumab, and every 3 months during trastuzumab alone. Cardiotoxicity was defined as signs and/or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or an absolute decrease in LVEF ofor=20 units or a decline toor=45%. In the first stage of the study, three episodes of cardiotoxicity were observed (two asymptomatic declines of LVEF and one CHF) in 29 patients, and recruitment continued. During follow-up of patients who continued trastuzumab after chemotherapy, seven further cardiologic events occurred (three asymptomatic decline of LVEF and four CHF). Therefore, recruitment was interrupted after the 45th patient. The majority of cardiac events occurred late during trastuzumab alone, half were asymptomatic and all cases of CHF were resolved using cardiac therapy. Complete and partial responses were 20 and 47%, respectively, and the median time to progression was 15.7 months (95% CI, 11.6-19.0 months). In light of the cardiotoxicity experienced during this study, we currently recommend that this combination be used only in controlled clinical trials under vigilant cardiac monitoring.

Tumor response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer offers prognostic information and may be used as a surrogate marker for evaluating treatment efficacy. With this study we wanted to determine whether changes in circulating serum CA 15-3 levels during chemotherapy provided additional information for prognostic prediction. Serum CA 15-3 was measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months during anthracycline-based first-line chemotherapy in 526 patients with advanced breast cancer prospectively enrolled in five phase II-III trials. Changes in marker levels were correlated with disease response, time to progression and overall survival. In all, 336 patients attained a disease response. A significant relationship was found between disease response and CA 15-3 variations, although many individual discrepancies were also observed. At the 6-month time point, the median time to progression was 15.3 months in patients with normal marker levels throughout the study, 11.7 months in those with a CA15-3 reduction >25%, 9.6 months in those with elevated baseline CA 15-3 levels which did not change during therapy and 8.6 months in those with increased marker levels (p < 0.001). The median survival was 42.3, 29.7, 28.5, and 24.8 months, respectively (p < 0.002). The prognostic role of changes in CA 15-3 levels was maintained in the patient subset attaining disease response or stabilization to treatment (p < 0.001) and after adjusting for clinical response and major prognostic parameters in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). In conclusion, monitoring serum CA 15-3 levels during first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients provides prognostic information independently from tumor response.

Background: To test safety and activity of 3-weekly doses of docetaxel and a weekly dose of trastuzumab in women with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Forty-two women, median age 53 years (range 36–73 years), with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer were enrolled in a study of docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 q3w for 6 cycles, and trastuzumab, 4 mg/kg loading dose, 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter. Thirty-four patients (81%) had visceral metastatic involvement. Thirty-five patients had received prior chemotherapy as part of their treatment: adjuvant/neoadjuvant (26), metastatic (2) and both (7). Thirty-one patients had been previously exposed to an anthracycline and 11 to paclitaxel. Four patients had previously received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. Results: 226 cycles (median 6, range 1–6) were administered. The median delivered dose intensity for docetaxel was 24 mg/m2/week (range 16–25 mg/m2/week). The intent to treat overall response rate was 67% (95% confidence interval, 52–79%). Median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and duration of response were 9, 8 and 12 months, respectively. Symptomatic cardiotoxicity (grade 3) occurred in 1 patient. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (76% of the patients), although febrile neutropenia did not occur. Conclusions: Three-weekly doses of docetaxel and a weekly dose of trastuzumab is an active and safe combination in patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oral capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and epirubicin (TEX) as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast carcinoma. METHODS This open-label, Phase II study was conducted at six Italian centers. Treatment consisted of epirubicin, 75 mg/m2 (intravenous bolus), and docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion), both administered on Day 1, plus oral capecitabine, 1000 mg/m2 twice daily, on Days 1–14 of each 3-week treatment cycle. RESULTS A total of 67 patients received 392 cycles of treatment, with a median of 6 cycles in patients with Stage III disease (n = 34 patients) and a median of 8 cycles in patients with Stage IV disease (n = 33 patients). The objective response rate was 82%, including complete responses in 21% of patients. A greater proportion of patients with Stage III disease achieved tumor responses compared with patients who had Stage IV disease (97% vs. 67%, respectively). Among 34 patients with Stage III disease, pathologic complete responses were confirmed in 10 patients (29%). TEX chemotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. There was a low incidence of Grade 3 adverse events, and Grade 4 adverse events were particularly rare (4%). The most common Grade 3–4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 16% of patients. CONCLUSIONS TEX combination therapy has important antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in this setting. A large, randomized, Phase III trial is ongoing to compare TEX chemotherapy with an epirubicin plus docetaxel regimen in patients with untreated, advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:1174–80. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11203

Aim of the study Validation of the sentinel node (SN) technique in breast cancer by means of lymphoscintigraphy. Materials and methods From December 1996 to January 1999 102 T1-T2 breast carcinoma cases were recruited in Turin. 99mTc-human serum albumin colloids were injected subdermally the day before surgery (mean activity, 5.2 ± 2.5 MBq). Scintigraphic imaging was performed after injection. After identification of the SN during surgery by a hand-held gamma probe, the SN was excised and sent for histologic examination. SN histology was compared with that of other axillary nodes. Results The SN detection rate was 86.3%; among 88 cases with an identified SN, 37 (42%) had axillary metastases; the SN was metastatic in 35 cases (sensitivity, 94.6%); in 51.3% of pN+ cases (19/37) the SN was the only metastatic site. In two of the 53 negative SNs, SN histology did not match with that of the remaining axilla (negative predictive value, 96.2%; staging accuracy, 97.7%). Conclusions Our results agree with those reported in the literature; however, except in clinical trials and experienced structures axillary lymph node dissection should not be abandoned when mandatory for prognostic purposes, considering that at present SN biopsy alone is not completely accurate for axillary staging, especially in the absence of an adequate learning period.

516 Background: This trial is aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of 2 regimens of adjuvant therapy for patients (pts) with node-positive breast cancer. Methods: Women with operable, N+ breast cancer and less than 10 involved axillary nodes were eligible. Therapy was as follows: Arm 1 (CEF): cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; Arm 2 (ET): epirubicin 90 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 3-hour infusion given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Tamoxifen (20 mg/die) was given to all pts with ER and/or PgR positive tumor. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were event free survival (EFS) and tolerability. The study was designed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.80, assuming an alpha error of 0.05 (two sided) and a power of 0.80. This required 500 pts per arm. Results: From Nov 1996 to Jan 2001, 1,055 pts were randomized: 520 pts received CEF and 535 ET regimens. Main pts characteristics were age

593 Background: the optimal treatment for HER2+ ABC patients (pts) progressing during T-based treatment is undefined. Retrospective studies (Fountzilas Clin Breast Cancer 2003; Gelmon Clin Breast C...

Background: The timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen (TAM) has been investigated only in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. We analyzed the outcome of both pre- and postmenopausal women who entered two randomized trials (Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo studies) on adjuvant chemotherapy and received either concomitant or sequential TAM. Patients and methods: Patients who received anthracycline-based regimens and either concomitant or sequential TAM were eligible. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) of death or recurrence for treatment comparisons were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Among the 1096 eligible patients, 507 (46.3%) and 589 (53.7%) received concomitant and sequential TAM, respectively. The median follow-up time was 6.6 years. Ten-year OS was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78–88%] and 80% (95% CI 74–86%) in the concomitant and sequential groups, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed no significant difference in the hazard of death (HR = 1.13; 95% CI 0.78–1.64; P = 0.534) and recurrence (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.80–1.33; P = 0.88) between the two groups. A decreasing trend (P = 0.015) in HR of death with increasing age was observed indicating, that concomitant therapy might be more effective than sequential therapy in young patients. Conclusions: We observed no outcome difference between sequential and concomitant chemo-endocrine therapy. The potential advantage of concomitant TAM in young patients needs to be further addressed in prospective trials.

Background This open-label study compared docetaxel/gemcitabine vs. paclitaxel/gemcitabine and a weekly (W) vs. 3-weekly (3 W) schedule in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Patients relapsed after adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were randomized to: A) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 Day 1,8 + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Day 1 q3W; B) gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 Day 1,8 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Day 1 q3W; C) gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 + docetaxel 30 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 q4W; D) gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 Day 1,15 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 q4W. Primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Results Interim analysis led to accrual interruption (241 patients enrolled of 360 planned). Median TTP (months) was 8.33 (95% CI: 6.19-10.16) with W and 7.51 (95% CI: 5.93-8.33) with 3 W (p=0.319). No differences were observed in median TTP between docetaxel and paclitaxel, with 85.6% and 87.0% of patients progressing, respectively. OS did not differ between regimens/schedules. ORR was comparable between regimens (HR: 0.882; 95% CI: 0.523-1.488; p=0.639), while it was significantly higher in W than in the 3 W (HR: 0.504; 95% CI: 0.299-0.850; p=0.010) schedule. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 69.2% and 71.9% of patients on docetaxel and paclitaxel, and in 65.8% and 75.2% in W and 3 W. Conclusions Both treatment regimens showed similar TTP. W might be associated with a better tumour response compared with 3 W. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov ID NCT00236899

1073 Background: Weekly (W) administration of Gemcitabine+Docetaxel (G+D) or Gemcitabine+Paclitaxel (G+P) at low doses may be associated with greater efficacy and/or lower toxicity compared to the standard 3-weekly (3W) schedule. Methods: Patients (pts) (360) with MBC, that relapsed after one adjuvant/neoadjuvant regimen containing an anthracycline (unless contraindicated) that was completed for at least 12 months, were to be randomized equally to a) D 75mg/m2 on Day1 + G 1000mg/m2 on Days1/8 q3W ; b) P 175mg/m2 on Day1 + G 1250mg/m2 on Days1/8 q3W ; c) D 30mg/m2 + G 800mg/m2 on Days1/8/15 qW; or d) P 80mg/m2 + G 800mg/m2 on Days1/8/15 qW. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and overall toxicity (T). Results: Due to slow accrual rate, a futility analysis was performed to evaluate the chance of observing a significant result in favour of the alternative hypothesis. The results from this led to early study termination. 241 pts [median age (range) 57.0(31-77) years] were enrolled and randomized to: 3W G+D 60(24.9%); 3W G+P 64(26.6%); W G+D 58(24.1%); W G+P 59(24.5%), of which 18(30.0%), 24(37.5%), 14(24.1%) and 19(32.2%) pts respectively completed the study protocol (i.e. received 6 cycles, extended up to 10 for partial/complete responders). Median TTP [months(95%CIs)] was 8.33 (6.19-10.16) in W and 7.51 (5.93-8.33) in 3W, with 86.3% of pts progressed in each schedule. OS did not significantly differ between treatments and schedules. ORR was comparable between D and P, while it was higher in W than in 3W (50.4% vs. 33.1%; odds ratio 0.44 [95%CI: 0.26-0.75], p=0.003). Grade 3/4 Ts were 69.2% and 71.9% of pts in D and P and showed a higher trend in 3W (75.2%) than in W (65.8%). Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 T (51.7% and 44.7% in D and P; 39.3% and 56.5% in W and 3W). Conclusions: No substantial differences between treatments were observed in safety and efficacy. W might be associated with lower grade 3/4 Ts and possibly with a better tumour response compared to 3W. These results should be interpreted with caution due to early termination of the study.