Search

Resumen: La insuficiencia mitral severa es una entidad de alta prevalencia cuyo tratamiento de elección es quirúrgico. Sin embargo, la mayoría de veces una gran población no es intervenida por el alto riesgo quirúrgico. Por tal motivo ha surgido el reparo mitral percutáneo con dispositivo tipo MitraClip® (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara California EEUU), para lograr corregir la insuficiencia mitral. En este artículo se describe la evidencia actual de esta técnica, así como el procedimiento y sus complicaciones. Abstract: Severe mitral insufficiency is a highly prevalent condition for which the treatment of choice is surgery. However, the majority of a large population is not often intervened due to the high surgical risk. For this reason, the use has been suggested of percutaneous mitral valve repair with a MitraClip® type device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA), in order to correct the mitral insufficiency. In this article, a description is presented of the current evidence of this technique, as well as the procedure and its complications. Palabras clave: Insuficiencia mitral, MitraClip®, Reparo valvular mitral percutáneo, Keywords: Mitral insufficiency, MitraClip®, Percutaneous mitral valve repair

Resumen: El cierre percutáneo de la orejuela izquierda se ha desarrollado como una alternativa terapéutica en pacientes con fibrilación auricular que tienen contraindicaciones para anticoagulación prolongada; también para aquellos que no logran anticoagulación adecuada ya sea por deserción, percepción de alto riesgo para sangrado, intolerancia a los anticoagulantes orales o anticoagulación difícil de controlar, pero también, cuando hay de riesgo alto de hemorragia como en la concurrencia de stent coronarios y cuando existen contraindicaciones racionales como riesgo elevado de caídas. Las imágenes de ecocardiografía algunas veces complementadas con tomografía computarizada, son las más importantes para las precisiones anatómicas necesarias al seleccionar el dispositivo correcto y guiar su instalación endovascular. Abstract: The percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage has been developed as a therapeutic alternative in patients with atrial fibrillation and have contraindications for prolonged anticoagulation. It can also be for those that do not achieve adequate anticoagulation, not only due to abandonment, a perception of high risk of bleeding, an intolerance to oral anticoagulants, or difficult to control anticoagulant, but also when there is a high risk of haemorrhage, as can occur in coronary stents, and when there are rational contraindications, such as a high risk of falls. The echocardiography images, sometimes complemented with computed tomography, are most important for the anatomical precision required for choosing the correct equipment and as guide for endovascular implantation. Palabras clave: Fibrilación auricular, Anticoagulación, Eventos tromboembólicos, Riesgo de sangrado, Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Anticoagulation, Thromboembolic events, Risk of bleeding

Aims Due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration, aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed. There are no data on long-term outcomes after aortic ViV. Our aim was to perform a large-scale assessment of long-term survival and reintervention after aortic ViV. Methods and results A total of 1006 aortic ViV procedures performed more than 5 years ago [mean age 77.7 ± 9.7 years; 58.8% male; median STS-PROM score 7.3% (4.2–12.0)] were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with Medtronic self-expandable valves (CoreValve/Evolut, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (n = 523, 52.0%), Edwards balloon-expandable valves (EBEV, SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT/SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (n = 435, 43.2%), and other devices (n = 48, 4.8%). Survival was lower at 8 years in patients with small-failed bioprostheses [internal diameter (ID) ≤ 20 mm] compared with those with large-failed bioprostheses (ID > 20 mm) (33.2% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.01). Independent correlates for mortality included smaller-failed bioprosthetic valves [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.13)], age [HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01–1.45)], and non-transfemoral access [HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11–1.84)]. There were 40 reinterventions after ViV. Independent correlates for all-cause reintervention included pre-existing severe prosthesis–patient mismatch [subhazard ratio (SHR) 4.34 (95% CI 1.31–14.39)], device malposition [SHR 3.75 (95% CI 1.36–10.35)], EBEV [SHR 3.34 (95% CI 1.26–8.85)], and age [SHR 0.59 (95% CI 0.44–0.78)]. Conclusions The size of the original failed valve may influence long-term mortality, and the type of the transcatheter valve may influence the need for reintervention after aortic ViV.

Background RENASCENT is a prospective, multi-center first-in-human clinical study to evaluate the clinical performance of the novel sirolimus-eluting 150-μm strut thickness FORTITUDE® BRS for percutaneous coronary intervention of single de novo coronary lesions. Methods FORTITUDE® BRS was tested in a prospective study in Italy and Colombia. Study objectives were in-scaffold angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) measured by quantitative coronary angiography and target vessel failure (TVF) defined as the composite rate of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9- and 24-months with clinical results up to 36-months. Results A total of 63 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent lesion pre-dilatation and 22 patients (34.9%) underwent post-dilatation. Clinical device and procedural success was 98.4% (62/63 patients) and 96.8% (61/63 patients) respectively. At 9-months, TVF occurred in 3/61 (4.9%) of the patients including 2 peri-procedural MI and one ischemia-driven TLR. Between 9- to 24-months, ischemia-driven TLR occurred in 3 additional patients (4.9%) including 1 patient who presented with very late ST after stopping all medications. There were no further TVF between 24- and 36-months. Conclusions In this multi-center prospective study, the FORTITUDE® BRS was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of single coronary lesions with low levels of TVF and LLL at 9- and 24-months. It was shown to be clinically safe upto 36-months follow-up.

Objectives The authors aimed to determine the procedural learning curve and minimum annual institutional volumes associated with optimum clinical outcomes for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a complex procedure requiring significant training and experience for successful outcome. Despite increasing use of TAVR across institutions, limited information is available for its learning curve characteristics and minimum annual volumes required to optimize clinical outcomes. Methods The study collected data for patients at 16 centers participating in the international TAVR registry since initiation of the respective TAVR program. All cases were chronologically ordered into initial (1 to 75), early (76 to 150), intermediate (151 to 225), high (226 to 300), and very high (>300) experience operators for TAVR learning curve characterization. In addition, participating institutions were stratified by annual TAVR case volume into low-volume ( 100) groups for comparative analysis. Procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected and multivariate regression analysis performed for 30-day mortality and the early safety endpoint. Results A total of 3,403 patients comprised the study population. On multivariate analysis, all-cause mortality was significantly higher for initial (odds ratio [OR]: 3.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93 to 7.60), early (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.51 to 5.03), and intermediate (OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.19 to 5.40) experience groups compared with the very high experience operators. In addition, the early safety endpoint was significantly worse for all experience groups compared with the very high experience operators. Low annual volume ( Conclusions TAVR procedures display important learning curve characteristics with both greater procedural safety and a lower mortality when performed by experienced operators. In addition, TAVR performed at low annual volume (

Resumen El proposito de este consenso es presentar un resumen de los principales estudios que han evaluado el implante valvular aortico percutaneo como terapia alternativa en pacientes con estenosis aortica sintomatica severa, quienes no pueden ser sometidos a cirugia por un alto riesgo quirurgico, o que se consideran inoperables por el “equipo cardiologico”, condiciones consideradas como indicacion para dispositivos “off label”. Luego se describen metodos diagnosticos para la estenosis aortica y ayudas para saber con cual equipo de cardiologia estructural contar en la planificacion, se revisa el procedimiento y finalmente se mencionan las complicaciones y los riesgos del mismo.

Despite rapidly increasing use of TAVR across institutions, limited data is available for the effect of procedural experience on TAVR outcomes. We investigate the relationship between institutional experience and TAVR outcomes.1953 patients undergoing TAVR at 8 international sites were grouped into chronological quantiles (Q) to assess temporal changes on procedural and clinical outcomes and multivariate logistic regression performed to determine predictors of device success, early safety and all-cause mortality.The mean age of patients was 81±7years and 991 (51%) were female. The quantiles comprised of first 62 cases for Q1, 63-133 for Q2, 134 to 242 for Q3 and 243 to 476 for Q4. Device success increased from Q1 to Q4 (78% vs 89%, p0.001) with significant improvement in the early safety endpoint (19% vs 10%, p0.001). All cause mortality reduced by half in Q4 compared to Q1 (8% vs 4%, p=0.01) and rates of major vascular complications, major bleeding and valve embolization decreased with increasing experience. The multivariate analysis identified TAVR in Q3 and Q4 to be independently associated with higher device success and lower risk of complications. TAVR in Q4 was independently associated with lower mortality (OR 0.36 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p=0.002).Greater institutional experience with TAVR procedures improves device success and clinical outcomes. An experience of242 cases is independently associated with lower mortality. These findings have important implications for defining minimum volume criteria for institutions and training standards for TAVR procedure.

Background Clinical outcomes in large patient populations from real-world clinical practice with a next-generation self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve are lacking. Objectives This study sought to document the clinical and device performance outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a next-generation, self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) system in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in routine clinical practice. Methods The FORWARD (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD) study is a prospective, single-arm, multinational, multicenter, observational study. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated safety endpoints based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. An independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms. From January 2016 to December 2016, TAVR with the next-generation self-expanding THV was attempted in 1,038 patients with symptomatic, severe AS at 53 centers on 4 continents. Results Mean age was 81.8 ± 6.2 years, 64.9% were women, the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 5.5 ± 4.5%, and 33.9% of patients were deemed frail. The repositioning feature of the THV was applied in 25.8% of patients. A single valve was implanted in the proper anatomic location in 98.9% of patients. The mean aortic valve gradient was 8.5 ± 5.6 mm Hg, and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was 1.9% at discharge. All-cause mortality was 1.9%, and disabling stroke occurred in 1.8% at 30 days. The expected-to-observed early surgical mortality ratio was 0.35. A pacemaker was implanted in 17.5% of patients. Conclusions TAVR using the next-generation THV is clinically safe and effective for treating older patients with severe AS at increased operative risk. (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD Study [FORWARD]; NCT02592369)

Aims Bioresorbable polymer drug-eluting stent technologies have been considered to have the potential to enhance vascular healing by reducing polymer exposure to the vessel wall, potentially allowing the earlier discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. At present, the early vascular healing response to this type of technologies is still unclear. Patients and methods The TIMELESS study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study that enrolled real-world patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients underwent Synergy stent implantation, which consists of a platinum-chromium platform coated with an ultra-thin abluminal bioabsorbable poly-D,L-lactide-co-glycolide polymer-eluting everolimus. Results A total of 37 patients were included in the study. The majority of the patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention because of acute coronary syndromes. At 3 months, angiographic follow-up showed a percentage diameter of stenosis of 8.1±7.5% and an angiographic late loss of 0.03±0.24 mm. In all analyzed struts, less than 1% of struts were definitely uncovered or covered with fibrin, 12.5% (5.0-18.5%) showed evidence of partial coverage, and the remaining (∼85%) were fully covered. No stent thrombosis was observed up to 12 months of clinical follow-up. Conclusion In a real-world population, the implantation of a bioresorbable polymer drug-eluting stent resulted in almost complete strut coverage throughout the entire stent length at 3 months. The clinical implications for antiplatelet therapy and outcomes should be investigated further.

Background There is a lack of data on outcomes in classical (C-LFLG) and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (P-LFLG) patients undergoing TAVR. Purpose We aim to compare baseline characteristic and procedural outcomes between C-LFLG, P-LFLG and high-gradient aortic stenosis (HG-AS) patients undergoing TAVR. Methods Patients included in the Transcatheter RegistrY of aorTic valve biOprosthesis in Latin-AMerica (TRYTOM Registry) were divided in 3 groups: 1) HG-AS: mean transaortic gradient (MG) ≥40 mmHg; 2) P-LFLG: MG Results 1040 patients were included, 677 (65%) classified as HG-AS, 223 (21%) as P-LFLG and 140 (14%) as C-LFLG. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 0–109). There were baseline differences between HG-AS, P-LFLG and C-LFLG regarding age (80±7 vs 80±5 vs 78±8 years, respectively; p=0.017), NYHA FC III and IV (61.0 vs 72.6 vs 83.6%, respectively; p Conclusions Apart from baseline differences, TAVR in P-LFLG and C-LFLG was feasible and with similar clinical outcomes when compared to HG-AS. Mid-term mortality rates was associated with diabetes, creatinine and procedure complications.

Background Current surgical and medical treatment options for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) are limited and additional interventional approaches are required. Objectives This study sought to report the safety and performance data from the feasibility study with a novel direct annuloplasty system. Methods Seventy-one patients with moderate to severe FMR (mean 67.7 ± 11.3 years of age, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction 34.0 ± 8.3%), on stable medical heart failure medication were prospectively enrolled. Results Device success rate was 70.4% (n = 50 of 71). No intraprocedural death occurred. In patients receiving implants, 4 patients (8.9%) experienced cardiac tamponade. Thirty-day (n = 45) and 6-month (n = 41) rates for all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction were 4.4%, 4.4%, and 0.0% and 12.2%, 4.9%, and 0%, respectively. At 6 months, nonurgent mitral surgery was performed in 1 patient (2.4%) and nonurgent percutaneous repair in 7 patients (17.1%). Echocardiographic core analysis after 6 months showed mitral regurgitation reduction in 50% of treated patients by a mean of 1.3 grades. Concerning mitral valve (MV) annular geometry, we found significant reduction of anterior-posterior (–0.31 ± 0.4 cm) and septal-lateral dimensions (–0.21 ± 0.3 cm), a decreased MV-tenting area (–0.57 ± 1.1 cm2) and increase in MV coaptation length (0.13 ± 0.2 cm). Transthoracic echocardiography indicated reverse LV remodeling with reduction of LV end-diastolic diameter (–0.20 ± 0.4 mm) and volume (–22 ± 39 ml). Treatment was associated with significant improvement in 6-min walking distances (56.5 ± 92.0 m) and improvements in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV at 6 months from 53.3% to 23.3%. Conclusions Percutaneous direct annuloplasty is feasible and safe in high-risk FMR patients. This treatment initiates LV reverse remodeling, and provides clinical improvement during 6 months after treatment. (Mitralign Percutaneous Annuloplasty First in Man Study; NCT01852149).

Background Scarce data exist on the incidence of and factors associated with valve hemodynamic deterioration (VHD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objectives This study sought to determine the incidence, timing, and predictors of VHD in a large cohort of patients undergoing TAVR. Methods This multicenter registry included 1,521 patients (48% male; 80 ± 7 years of age) who underwent TAVR. Mean echocardiographic follow-up was 20 ± 13 months (minimum: 6 months). Echocardiographic examinations were performed at discharge, at 6 to 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Annualized changes in mean gradient (mm Hg/year) were calculated by dividing the difference between the mean gradient at last follow-up and the gradient at discharge by the time between examinations. VHD was defined as a ≥10 mm Hg increase in transprosthetic mean gradient during follow-up compared with discharge assessment. Results The overall mean annualized rate of transprosthetic gradient progression during follow-up was 0.30 ± 4.99 mm Hg/year. A total of 68 patients met criteria of VHD (incidence: 4.5% during follow-up). The absence of anticoagulation therapy at hospital discharge (p = 0.002), a valve-in-valve (TAVR in a surgical valve) procedure (p = 0.032), the use of a 23-mm valve (p = 0.016), and a greater body mass index (p = 0.001) were independent predictors of VHD. Conclusions There was a mild but significant increase in transvalvular gradients over time after TAVR. The lack of anticoagulation therapy, a valve-in-valve procedure, a greater body mass index, and the use of a 23-mm transcatheter valve were associated with higher rates of VHD post-TAVR. Further prospective studies are required to determine whether a specific antithrombotic therapy post-TAVR may reduce the risk of VHD.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the changes in transvalvular gradients and the incidence of valve haemodynamic deterioration (VHD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), according to use of anticoagulation therapy.Methods and resultsThis multicentre study included 2466 patients (46% men; mean age 81±7 years) who underwent TAVR with echocardiography performed at 12-month follow-up. Anticoagulation therapy was used in 707 patients (28.7%) following TAVR (AC group). A total of 663 patients received vitamin K antagonists, and 44 patients received direct oral anticoagulants. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for intergroup (AC vs non-AC post-TAVR) differences. A total of 622 patients per group were included in the propensity-matched analysis. VHD was defined as a ≥10 mm Hg increase in the mean transprosthetic gradient at follow-up (vs hospital discharge). The mean clinical follow-up was 29±18 months. The mean transvalvular gradient significantly increased at follow-up in the non-AC group within the global cohort (P=0.003), whereas it remained stable over time in the AC group (P=0.323). The incidence of VHD was significantly lower in the AC group (0.6%) compared with the non-AC group (3.7%, PConclusionsThe lack of anticoagulation therapy post-TAVR was associated with significant increments in transvalvular gradients and a greater risk of VHD. VHD was subclinical in most cases and did not associate with major adverse clinical events. Future randomised trials are needed to determine if systematic anticoagulation therapy post-TAVR would reduce the incidence of VHD.

Background Little evidence exists of the burden and predictors of cardiac death after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of cardiac death from advanced heart failure (HF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a large patient cohort undergoing TAVR. Methods The study included a total of 3,726 patients who underwent TAVR using balloon (57%) or self-expandable (43%) valves. Causes of death were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium–2. Results At a mean follow-up of 22 ± 18 months, 155 patients had died due to advanced HF (15.2% of total deaths, 46.1% of deaths from cardiac causes) and 57 had died due to SCD (5.6% of deaths, 16.9% of cardiac deaths). Baseline comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, lower mean transaortic gradient, pulmonary artery systolic pressure >60 mm Hg; p 160 ms had a greater SCD risk (HR: 4.78, 95% CI: 1.56 to 14.63; p = 0.006). Conclusions Advanced HF and SCD accounted for two-thirds of cardiac deaths in patients after TAVR. Potentially modifiable or treatable factors leading to increased risk of mortality for HF and SCD were identified. Future studies should determine whether targeting these factors decreases the risk of cardiac death.

We appreciate the comments of Dr. Vavuranakis and colleagues regarding our recently published paper [(1)][1]. In their letter, Dr. Vavuranakis and colleagues emphasize that the differing distribution of coronary artery disease (CAD) across the patient and treatment groups within our study, more

Background: Data on long-term outcomes after valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcomes and structural valve degeneration (SVD) over time in patients undergoing ViV-TAVR. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients undergoing ViV-TAVR in 9 centers between 2009 and 2015 were included. Patients were followed yearly, and clinical and echocardiography data were collected prospectively. SVD was defined as subclinical (increase >10 mm Hg in mean transvalvular gradient+decrease >0.3 cm 2 in valve area or new-onset mild or moderate aortic regurgitation) and clinically relevant (increase >20 mm Hg in mean transvalvular gradient+decrease >0.6 cm 2 in valve area or new-onset moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation). A total of 116 patients (mean age, 76±11 years; 64.7% male; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 8.0±5.1%) were included. Balloon- and self-expandable valves were used in 47.9% and 52.1% of patients, respectively, and 30-day mortality was 6.9%. At a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 2–7 years), 30 patients (25.9%) had died, 20 of them (17.2%) from cardiovascular causes. Average mean transvalvular gradients remained stable up to 5-year follow-up ( P =0.92), but clinically relevant SVD occurred in 3/99 patients (3.0%), and 15/99 patients (15.1%) had subclinical SVD. One patient with SVD had redo ViV-TAVR. Conclusions: About one-fourth of ViV-TAVR recipients had died after a median follow-up of 3 years. Overall valve hemodynamics remained stable over time and clinically relevant SVD was infrequent, but 1 out of 10 patients exhibited some degree of SVD.

Background: The impact of preexisting left bundle branch block (LBBB) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preexisting LBBB on clinical outcomes after TAVR. Methods and Results: This multicenter study evaluated 3404 TAVR candidates according to the presence or absence of LBBB on baseline ECG. TAVR complications and causes of death were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Follow-up outpatient visits or telephone interviews were conducted at 30 days, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Echocardiography examinations were performed at baseline, at hospital discharge, and at 1-year follow-up. Preexisting LBBB was present in 398 patients (11.7%) and was associated with an increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI; 21.1% versus 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.12–2.04) but not death (7.3% versus 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.84–2.12) at 30 days. At a mean follow-up of 22±21 months, there were no differences between patients with and without preexisting LBBB in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75–1.18) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68–1.21). In a subanalysis of 2421 patients without PPI at 30 days and with complete follow-up about the PPI, preexisting LBBB was not associated with an increased risk of PPI or sudden cardiac death. Patients with preexisting LBBB had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline and at 1-year follow-up ( P P =0.327). Conclusions: Preexisting LBBB significantly increased the risk of early (but not late) PPI after TAVR, without any significant effect on overall mortality or cardiovascular mortality. Preexisting LBBB was associated with lower LVEF pre-TAVR but did not prevent an increase in LVEF post-TAVR similar to patients without LBBB.

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the degree of residual aortic regurgitation (AR) and acuteness of presentation of AR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on outcomes. Background The degree of residual AR after TAVR leading to excess mortality remains controversial, and little evidence exists on the impact of the acuteness of presentation of AR. Methods A total of 1,735 patients undergoing TAVR with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves were included. The presence and degree of AR were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography; acute AR was defined as an increase in AR severity of ≥1 degree compared with pre-procedural echocardiography. Results Residual AR was classified as mild in 761 patients (43.9%) and moderate to severe in 247 patients (14.2%). The presence of moderate to severe AR was an independent predictor of mortality at a mean follow-up of 21 ± 17 months compared with none to trace (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 2.48; p 0.50). Conclusions AR occurred very frequently after TAVR, but an increased risk of mortality at ∼2-year follow-up was observed only in patients with acute moderate to severe AR.

Aim The aim of this study was to determine the effects of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) on early and late outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and to evaluate the predictive factors of poorer outcomes in such patients. Methods and results This was a multicentre study including a total of 2075 consecutive patients who had undergone TAVI. Patients were grouped according the estimated glomerular filtration rate as follows: CKD stage 1-2 (≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 950), stage 3 (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 924), stage 4 (15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 134) and stage 5 (

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the main baseline and procedural characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of patients from a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) who suffered coronary obstruction (CO). Background Very little data exist on CO following TAVI. Methods This multicenter registry included 44 patients who suffered symptomatic CO following TAVI of 6,688 patients (0.66%). Pre-TAVI computed tomography data was available in 28 CO patients and in a control group of 345 patients (comparisons were performed including all patients and a cohort matched 1:1 by age, sex, previous coronary artery bypass graft, transcatheter valve type, and size). Results Baseline and procedural variables associated with CO were older age (p Conclusions Symptomatic CO following TAVI was a rare but life-threatening complication that occurred more frequently in women, in patients receiving a balloon-expandable valve, and in those with a previous surgical bioprosthesis. Lower-lying coronary ostium and shallow sinus of Valsalva were associated anatomic factors, and despite successful treatment, acute and late mortality remained very high, highlighting the importance of anticipating and preventing the occurrence of this complication.

This study sought to assess the influence of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as sudden cardiac death (SCD) among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Few data exist regarding the late clinical impact of pre-existing RBBB in TAVR recipients.A total of 3,527 patients (mean age 82 ± 8 years, 50.1% men) were evaluated according to the presence of RBBB on baseline electrocardiography. Intraventricular conduction abnormalities were classified according to the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, and Heart Rhythm Society recommendations for standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. TAVR complications and causes of death were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions.RBBB was present on baseline electrocardiography in 362 patients (10.3%) and associated with higher 30-day rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (40.1% vs. 13.5%; p 0.001) and death (10.2% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.024). At a mean follow-up of 20 ± 18 months, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.63; p = 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.89; p = 0.006) but not with SCD (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.32; p = 0.57). Patients with pre-existing RBBB and without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization had the highest 2-year risk for cardiovascular death (27.8%; 95% CI: 20.9% to 36.1%; log-rank p = 0.007). In a subanalysis of 1,245 patients without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization and with complete follow-up regarding the need for PPI, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with the composite of SCD and PPI (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.16 to 6.17; p = 0.023).Pre-existing RBBB was found in 10% of TAVR recipients and was associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Patients with baseline RBBB without permanent pacemakers at hospital discharge may be at especially high risk for high-degree atrioventricular block and/or SCD during follow-up. Future studies should evaluate strategies aimed at the early detection of patients at risk for late development of high-degree atrioventricular block.

In-hospital infection (IHI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has received little attention, although it may have a significant effect on outcomes and costs because of prolonged hospital stay. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the incidence, type, predictors, and prognostic effects of 1111 after TAVI. This study included 298 consecutive patients from 2 centers who underwent TAVI from November 2005 to November 2011. IHI during the hospital stay was defined on the basis of symptoms and signs assessed by the attending physician in the cardiac care unit or medium care unit in combination with all technical examinations performed to confirm infection. IHI after TAVI was observed in 58 patients (19.5%): urinary tract infections in 25 patients (43.1%), pneumonia in 12 patients (20.7%), and access-site infections in 7 patients (12.1%). In 12 patients (20.7%), the site of infection could not be determined, and 2 patients (3.4%) had multiple infection sites. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical access through the femoral artery was the most important determinant of infection (odds ratio [OR] 4.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 17.19), followed by perioperative major stroke (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 9.52) and overweight (body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2); OR.2.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.59). The length of hospital stay in patients with IHIs was 15.0 days (interquartile range 8.0 to 22.0) compared with 7.0 days (interquartile range 4.0 to 10.0) in patients without infections (p

OBJECTIVES The study sought to examine the risk of ischemic events and bleeding episodes associated with differing antithrombotic strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF).BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend antiplatelet therapy (APT) post-TAVR to reduce the risk of stroke. However, data on the efficacy and safety of this recommendation in the setting of a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (due to atrial fibrillation [AF]) with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) are scarce.METHODS A multicenter evaluation comprising 621 patients with AF undergoing TAVR was undertaken. Post-TAVR prescriptions were used to determine the antithrombotic regimen used according to the following 2 groups: monotherapy (MT) with VKA (n = 101) or multiple antithrombotic therapy (MAT) with VKA plus 1 or 2 antiplatelet agents (aspirin or clopidogrel; n = 520). Endpoint definitions were in accordance with Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The rate of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death), major or life-threatening bleeding events, and death were assessed by a Cox multivariate model regression survival analysis according to the antithrombotic regime used.RESULTS During a median follow-up of 13 months (interquartile range: 3 to 31 months) there were no differences between groups in the rate of stroke (MT: 5%, MAT: 5.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 to 3.48; p = 0.67), major adverse cardiovascular events (MT: 13.9%, MAT: 16.3%; adjusted HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.75 to 2.36; p = 0.33), and death (MT 22.8%, MAT: 19.2%; adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.50; p = 0.76). A higher risk of major or life-threatening bleeding was found in the MAT group (MT: 14.9%, MAT: 24.4%; adjusted HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.28; p = 0.04). These results remained similar when patients receiving VKA plus only 1 antiplatelet agent (n = 463) were evaluated.CONCLUSIONS In TAVR recipients prescribed VKA therapy for AF, concomitant antiplatelet therapy use appears not to reduce the incidence of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, or death, while increasing the risk of major or life-threatening bleeding. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Background— Blood transfusion is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to elucidate in more detail the relation between blood transfusion and AKI and its effects on short- and long-term mortality. Methods and Results— Nine hundred ninety-five patients with aortic stenosis underwent TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve or the Edwards Valve in 7 centers. AKI was defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL [≥26.4 μmol/L] or ≥50% increase ≤72 hours). Logistic and Cox regression was used for predictor and survival analysis. AKI occurred in 20.7% (n=206). The number of units of blood transfusion ≤24 hours was the strongest predictor of AKI (≥5 units, OR, 4.81 [1.45–15.95], 3–4 units, OR, 3.05 [1.24–7.53], 1–2 units, OR, 1.47 [0.98–2.22]) followed by peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.48 [1.05–2.10]), history of heart failure (OR, 1.43 [1.01–2.03]), leucocyte count ≤72 hours after TAVI (OR, 1.05 [1.02–1.09]) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE; OR, 1.02 [1.00–1.03]). Potential triggers of blood transfusion such as baseline anemia, bleeding-vascular complications, and perioperative blood loss were not identified as predictors. AKI and life-threatening bleeding were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (OR, 3.15 [1.56–6.38], OR, 6.65 [2.28–19.44], respectively), whereas transfusion (≥3 units), baseline anemia, and AKI predicted mortality beyond 30 days. Conclusions— AKI occurred in 21% of the patients after TAVI. The number of blood transfusions but not the indication of transfusion predicted AKI. AKI was a predictor of both short- and long-term mortality, whereas blood transfusion predicted long-term mortality. These findings indicate that outcome of TAVI may be improved by more restrictive use of blood transfusions.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function and its impact on the in-hospital and long-term outcome in patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Background: Although impaired LV function may be considered a contra-indication for aortic valve replacement, the hemodynamic characteristics of transcatheter valves may offer procedural and long-term clinical benefit in such patients. Methods: 230 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic-CoreValve System. Impaired LV function was defined by a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) = 35% (European Multicenter Study on Operative Risk Stratification and Long-term Outcome in patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis). Study endpoints were selected and defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations. Results: Compared with patients with a LVEF > 35% (n = 197), those with LVEF = 35% (n = 33) were more often male (78.8 % vs. 46.7%, P < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA class III or IV, 97.0% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.008) and had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery disease (63.6% vs. 43.1%, P = 0.029). The Logistic EuroSCORE was 14.8% and 22.8, respectively (P = 0.012). No difference was observed between the two groups in in-hospital or 30-day mortality (3.0% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.21), the Combined Safety Endpoint at 30 days (24.2% and 24.4%, P = 0.99) and survival free from readmission at one year (69.2% and 69.7%, P = 0.85). After adjustment, LVEF = 35% was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital complications and survival free from readmission at follow-up. Conclusion: The immediate and long-term outcome after TAVI did not differ between patients with an impaired and preserved LVEF. LVEF = 35% did not predict adverse immediate and long-term outcome. These findings suggest that TAVI should not be withheld in selected patients with impaired LV function. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Transcatheter valve implantation for pure severe native aortic valve insufficiency (AI) without aortic stenosis has recently been described in a small series of inoperable or high-risk patients.1 We describe first transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a man using a novel caval-aortic approach in a high-risk patient with severe AI, who was deemed unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement. A 72-year-old man with severely dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction, 20%) was admitted because of decompensated heart failure. A cardiac catheterization revealed nonobstructive coronary artery disease and severe (>4) AI. His Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 12.4% mainly because of age, low ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class IV, peripheral arterial disease, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus on insulin, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Given his aforementioned comorbidities, he was deemed high-risk candidate for surgical valve replacement. Because of severe peripheral arterial disease and maximum subclavian diameter

The first transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) approach was antegrade transvenous transseptal. This approach obligated transseptal catheterization and a more circuitous path to deploy the valve. The procedural complexities associated with the transseptal approach led to its replacement by

The evolution of TAVR procedures was possible due to various technical improvements, including the procedure itself and the devices. Nonetheless, little is known on real benefits in clinical practice of the performance of such newer devices in relation to the first generation OBJECTIVES To compare

Objective To evaluate the biological effect of microengineered stent grooves (MSG) on early strut healing in humans by performing optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis 3 weeks following the implantation. Background In the experimental setting, MSG accelerate endothelial cell migration and reduce neointimal proliferation compared with bare metal stent (BMS). Methods A total of 37 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with de novo coronary lesions were randomly assigned to either MSG (n=19) or an identical BMS controls (n=18). All patients underwent OCT imaging at 3 weeks. A total of 7959 struts were included in the final analysis. Results At 3 weeks following stent implantation, almost all struts analysed (~97%) had evidence of tissue coverage. The percentage of partially covered struts was comparable between both groups. However, the percentage of fully embedded struts was higher in the BMS group (81.22%, 49.75–95.52) compared with the MSG group (74.21%, 58.85–86.38). The stent-level analysis demonstrated reduction in neointimal formation (neointimal hyperplasia area and volume reduction of ~14% and ~19%, respectively) in the MSG versus the BMS group. In the strut-level analysis, an even greater reduction (~22% in neointimal thickness) was seen in the MSG group. Layered neointimal was present in ~6% of the OCT frames in the BMS group while it was not present in the MSG group. Conclusions MSG induced a more homogeneous and predictable pattern of surface healing in the early stages following stent implantation. The biological effect of MSG on stent healing has the potential to improve the safety profile of current generation drug-eluting stents. Classifications BMS, OCT, clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: Direct aortic deployment of a transcatheter aortic valve eliminates the need to traverse the aortic arch with the valve delivery system, enables placement of large sheaths in the aorta and innominate artery, provides maximal precision during deployment and ensures a safe, conventional surgical aortotomy closure. We describe the initial experience with the Suprasternal Aortic Access System (SuprAA System, Aegis Surgical Ltd, Dublin, Ireland) for direct transaortic/innominate valve delivery. METHODS: Patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who were candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via a direct transaortic approach were enrolled in the SuprAA-TAVR First-in-Man Study. Under general anaesthesia, the innominate artery and aortic arch were exposed in each patient, using the SuprAA System via a 2.5-cm incision directly above the sternal notch. The TAVR delivery sheath was positioned and the transcatheter valve deployed routinely under fluoroscopic guidance. Upon sheath removal, haemostasis at the aortotomy site was confidently secured using a double purse-string suture closure. All were extubated immediately. A meta-analysis of the direct aortic approach was done for comparison. RESULTS: Four male patients (mean 82.5 years) underwent SuprAA-TAVR (2 CoreValve; 2 SAPIEN). Anatomical visualization was excellent and suprasternal valve deployment was accurate regardless of sheath size with 100% Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 procedural success. The average total procedure time was 109.5 min without perioperative wound or vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: The SuprAA System provides direct aortic/innominate access without sternal or thoracotomy incision. Patient recovery to normal activity is maximized, sheath size limitations are eliminated and valve deployment is precise. This innovative system creates a new and exciting minimally invasive approach for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Background— Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results— A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P =0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P =0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P =0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P =0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time ( P =0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P =0.013; R 2 =0.121). Conclusions— The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) improves survival in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), TAVR is associated with a higher incidence of paravalvular leaks. The aortic regurgitation (AR) index has been shown to be

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is technically challenging, requiring significant training to optimize outcomes. Here, we investigate the learning curve for TAVR in a prospective multicenter registry. A total of 1953 patients undergoing TAVR at 8 sites from April 2009 to July 2014

Background— The objective of this study was to evaluate the timing, predictive factors, and prognostic value of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results— The study included 1061 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable (64%) or self-expandable (36%) valve. CVEs were classified as acute (≤24 hours), subacute (1–30 days), or late (>30 days). CVEs occurred in 54 patients (5.1%; stroke, 4.2%) within 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (acute in 54% of cases). The predictors of acute CVEs were balloon postdilation of the valve prosthesis (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval,1.07–5.67) and valve dislodgment/embolization (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.21–15.69); new-onset atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.11–6.83) was a predictor of subacute CVEs. Late CVEs occurred in 35 patients (3.3%; stroke, 2.1%) at a median follow-up of 12 months (3–23 months). The predictors of late CVEs were chronic atrial fibrillation (2.84; 95% CI, 1.46–5.53), peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.02–3.97), and prior cerebrovascular disease (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.01–4.15). Major stroke was associated with 30-day (odds ratio, 7.43; 95% CI, 2.45–22.53) and late (hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.01–3.04) mortality. Conclusions— In a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the rates of acute and subacute CVEs were 2.7% and 2.4%, respectively. While balloon postdilation and valve dislodgment/embolization were the predictors of acute CVEs, new-onset atrial fibrillation determined a higher risk for subacute events. Late events were determined mainly by a history of chronic atrial fibrillation and peripheral and cerebrovascular disease. The occurrence of major stroke was associated with increased early and late mortality. These results provide important insights for the implementation of preventive measures for CVEs after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Aims To assess treatment decision and outcome in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in addition to predictive factors of mortality after TAVI. Methods Three-centre prospective observational study including 358 patients. Endpoints were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Results Of the 358 patients referred for TAVI, TAVI was performed in 235 patients (65%), surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 24 (7%) and medical therapy (MT) in 99 (28%). Reasons to decline TAVI in favour of AVR/MT were patient preference (29%), peripheral vascular disease (15%) and non-severe aortic stenosis (11%). The logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher in patients who underwent TAVI and MT in comparison with those undergoing AVR (19 vs. 10%, p=0.007). At 30 days, all-cause mortality and the combined safety endpoint were 9 and 24% after TAVI and 8 and 25% after AVR, respectively. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the TAVI group compared with the MT group at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years (12% vs. 22%, 21% vs. 33% and 31% vs. 55%, respectively, p

The risk of surgical mitral valve replacement in patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) is very high due to comorbidities and technical challenges related to calcium burden, precluding surgery in many patients. There are few isolated reports of successful transcatheter mitral valve