Search

The aim of the study is to try to explain what an overtreatment is and which ones are the possible risks related to an excess of simplification in the medical practice, through the description of an emblematic clinical case. In the present article, we report the case of a female patient aged 57 who complained about lower back pain and crural neuralgia and had a lumbar and sacral magnetic resonance imaging performed in the Department of Neuroradiology in Bari showing suspicious repetitive bone lesions; therefore, the patient underwent several medical procedures and laboratory exams which ended with a surgical removal of a left L3–L4 foraminal disc herniation and a bone biopsy. When it was finally possible to exclude any other diseases including thyroid neoplasms, a “reassuring” osteoporosis diagnosis has been made since the lesions were likely to be degenerative and the patient underwent menopause 7 years ago. However, the multiplicity of the lesions of the vertebrae and of the pelvic bones as well as their signal could not be ignored, so that a close magnetic resonance imaging follow-up has been recommended. The present case is therefore a good example of overtreatment which may lead to delicate questions, investigating any possible mistakes in the diagnosis procedure as well as the role that defensive medicine is playing nowadays on medical procedures and the economic impact that all this can have on our healthcare system. In the end, we may ask ourselves: is “less” better or is “more” always “more?”

Objectives: To analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: Twenty patients with CNS involvement from ovarian carcinoma were evaluated in this retrospective study; their features and survivals were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods. Results: The incidence of CNS metastases was 5%, among 400 patients with ovarian cancer treated in our single institution. The median age at diagnosis of the ovarian cancer was 55 years. The median interval to the brain involvement and the median survival were 33 and 18 months, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with survival were the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, the surgical resection, the multimodal treatment, and the response after the therapy of the brain metastases. Conclusions: Brain involvement from ovarian cancer is uncommon but is increasing in incidence. Although the prognosis is usually poor, a multimodal approach can result in a long-term remission of the metastases and in an improvement of the overall survival.

Pituitary abscess is a rare entity and the correct diagnosis is still difficult before surgery. More than 210 cases have been reported in the medical literature, mostly in the form of isolated case reports. We report two cases of pituitary abscess treated endoscopically and we review the literature. A 30-year-old woman and a 35-year-old man were admitted with a history of pituitary dysfunction. Patient 1 presented with polyuria, polydipsia, amenorrhea, headache, and visual impairment. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a cystic intra- and supra-sellar lesion with ring enhancement after contrast injection. Patient 2 presented with frontal headache, proptosis, painful ophthalmoplegia, visual impairment, and fever. Eight years before the patient had undergone a transphenoidal surgery for Prolactinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a sellar lesion extending into the cavernous sinus and carotid artery bilaterally. Both patients underwent endoscopic transnasal-transsphenoidal exploration. Intraoperative diagnosis of pituitary abscess was made. The postoperative courses were uneventful. Antibiotic therapy was performed in both cases. Only three cases of endoscopic treatment of pituitary abscess have been reported in the literature. We recommend early management by endoscopic transphenoidal surgery for pituitary abscess: this technique is safe, with minimal blood loss, short operating time, low morbidity, and brief hospital stay.