Search

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare and locally aggressive benign tumor arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths. It is classified into localized (L-TGCT) and diffuse (D-TGCT) forms based on the extent of involvement. Surgical resection is the primary treatment, though achieving a definitive cure remains challenging due to the high recurrence rates, especially in D-TGCT. Systemic therapies targeting the CSF1-CSF1R axis have emerged as promising treatment options. CSF1R tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, nilotinib, pexidartinib, and vimseltinib, alongside anti-CSF1R antibodies like emactuzumab, cabiralizumab, and lacnotuzumab, have shown encouraging results in managing TGCT, particularly when surgery is not feasible or poses significant morbidity. Other potential therapies, including local treatments and anti-inflammatory drugs, are being explored for TGCT management. This review provides an overview of systemic treatment options for D-TGCT, highlighting emerging therapeutic modalities and their potential implications. Effective management is crucial due to TGCT’s significant morbidity despite its non-life-threatening nature, necessitating novel approaches to improve patient prognosis and quality of life.

Arising from the biliary tract, cholangiocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive epithelial cancer. According to the primary site, it can be further classified into intrahepatic, perihilar and distal types. Due to the lack of symptoms early in the disease course, most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Being not candidates for curative surgical management, these patients are treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy, and their prognosis remains poor. Using radioisotopes like yttrium-90 -labeled microspheres (90Y), radioembolization represents a local approach to treat primary and secondary liver tumors. In the case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, radioembolization can be used as a primary treatment, as an adjunct to chemotherapy or after failing chemotherapy. An 88-year-old man underwent radioembolization for a previously untreated stage II intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. One week later, he presented to our clinic with a non-pruritic maculopapular rash of the lower extremities and abdomen, worsening fatigue and low-grade fever. Laboratory exams, including hepatitis screening, were within normal limits. Showing positive immunofluorescence staining for immunoglobulin M (IgM) and complement 3 (C3) in vessel walls without IgA involvement, the skin biopsy results were compatible with leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Apart from the anticancer intervention, there have been no recent medication changes which could explain this complication. Notably, we did not observe any side effects during or after the perfusion scan with technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) performed prior to radioembolization. The symptoms resolved quickly after a short course of colchicine and did not reappear at cholangiocarcinoma progression. In the absence of other evident causes, we conclude that the onset of leukocytoclastic vasculitis in our patient was directly linked to the administration of yttrium-90 -labeled microspheres. Our report therefore demonstrates that this condition can be a rare but manageable complication of 90Y liver radioembolization.