Search

Background: We retrospectively investigated the role of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma. Methods: We selected all patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma, who had received radical surgery between January 2005 and December 2019 at 33 European sarcoma reference centers. The primary objective was to compare the outcome of patients who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not, in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). To reduce the risk of confounding due to imbalance, a propensity-score matching(PSM) was performed. Finally, subgroups analysis was performed according to tumor site, tumor size (< 50 mm or ≥ 50 mm) and patients predicted 10-years OS according to the nomogram sarculator (two different cutoff-values were applied: ≤ 33% or > 33% and < 60% or ≥ 60%). Results: 362 patients were analyzed: 149 (41.2%; treated group) received (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and 213 (58.6%; control group) did not. The median follow-up for the OS endpoint was 5.1 years (95% CI: 4.0–5.5). The OS-HR was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.40–0.83; p-value = 0.003) in the univariate analysis and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38–1.43; p = 0.367) in the PSM analysis. The DFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57–0.98; p-value = 0.036) in the univariate analysis, and 0.91 (95% CI:0.56–1.48; p-value = 0.7) in the PSM analysis. The DMFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55–1.02; p-value = 0.065) in univariate analysis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.53–1.61; p-value = 0.769) in the PSM analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed no heterogeneity of results in strata of tumor site. On the contrary, there was a trend for heterogeneity according to tumor size and patient's risk of death. For all the endpoints analyzed, patients with tumors smaller than 50 mm or at lower risk of death seem to have no benefit from chemotherapy, while patients with larger tumors or at higher risk of death at 10 years seem to derive substantial benefit. Conclusion: This large, retrospective study suggests that patients affected by > 50 mm and/or high-risk primary, localized angiosarcoma could benefit from (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Background] The value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not completely understood. This study investigated the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to prognostic stratification based on the Sarculator nomogram for STS., [Methods] This study analyzed data from ISG-STS 1001, a randomized study that tested 3 cycles of neoadjuvant anthracycline plus ifosfamide (AI) or histology-tailored (HT) chemotherapy in adult patients with STS. The 10-year predicted overall survival (pr-OS) was estimated with the Sarculator and was stratified into higher (10-year pr-OS < 60%) and lower risk subgroups (10-year pr-OS ≥ 60%)., [Results] The median pr-OS was 0.63 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.51-0.72) for the entire study population, 0.62 (IQR, 0.51-0.70) for the AI arm, and 0.64 (IQR, 0.51-0.73) for the HT arm. Three- and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.86) in lower risk patients and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.70-0.85) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.51-0.72) in the higher risk patients (log-rank test, P = .004). In higher risk patients, the 3- and 5-year Sarculator-predicted and study-observed OS rates were 0.68 and 0.58, respectively, and 0.85 and 0.66, respectively, in the AI arm (P = .04); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.69 and 0.60, respectively, and 0.69 and 0.55, respectively (P > .99). In lower risk patients, the 3- and 5-year Sarculator-predicted and study-observed OS rates were 0.85 and 0.80, respectively, and 0.89 and 0.82, respectively, in the AI arm (P = .507); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.87 and 0.81, respectively, and 0.86 and 0.74, respectively (P = .105)., [Conclusions] High-risk patients treated with AI performed better than predicted, and this adds to the evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant AI in STS., This was a nonfunded analysis. In the ISG-STS 1001 trial, PharmaMar provided trabectedin for the HG-MRLPS cohort. That trial was partially funded through a European Union grant (EUROSARC FP7 278472).

11575 Background: To further explore the activity of T as second/further line treatment in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS). The primary endpoint of the study was the growth modulation rate (GMR) defined as the ratio between the time to progression under T (TTP) and during previous chemotherapy treatment (TTP-1). The secondary end-points were objective response rate as per RECIST and PFS. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm Phase 2 study, conducted in 20 Italian centers. Patients with locally relapsed or metastatic disease, already treated with one or more previous systemic treatments with anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide, were enrolled. T was administered at a dose of 1.3-1.5 mg/mq with a top dose of 2.6 mg per cycle. T was administered as a 24h continuous infusion until progressive disease, major toxicity, patient’s intolerance or medical decision. As per protocol, patients were considered responders if the GMR was > 1.33, non-responders if < 0.75 and neither if 0.76-1.32. Eighty evaluable patients were needed to detect an odds of trabectedin response ≥ 2.5, corresponding to 71.4% of patients with a GMR > 1.33 (80% power, one-sided alpha 2.5%). Results: From August 2014 to February 2019, 104 patients were registered and 91 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (32 pts with LMS and 59 with LPS). Overall, the median number of cycles received was 6.0 (q1-q3 3.0-12.0), the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression in 72% of patients, followed by medical decision (8%). The median TTP was 6.0 months (6.2 and 6.0 for LMS and LPS), while the median TTP-1 was 7.5 months (8.1 and 6.4 for LMS and LPS). Thirty three patients (52% 95%CI: 36-58, p = 0.674, odds of response = 1.1) had a GMR > 1.33 (LMS: 46%, 95%CI 26-67,odds = 0.85; LPS 56%, 95%CI 40-72, odds = 1.3).Overall, response rate (CR+PR) was 16% (24% for LMS and 12% for LPS). Overall, in LPS we observed 15/47 patients with GMR < 0.5 and 15/47 with GMR > 2. Among LMS patients, 9/26 had a GMR < 0.5 and 10/26 > 2. Between LPS six patients had a GMR > 5. Previous treatment had been based on anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide in 85% of patients (91% in LPS population). Conclusions: While the primary end point of the study was not met, we noticed a subgroup of patients with a markedly discrepant TTP with T in comparison to previous therapy (GMR < 0.5 or > 2, the latter including some pts with a long TTP with T). Efforts are ongoing to assess the pathologic counterparts of such discrepancies. T seems to be selectively active in poorly understood subgroups, with a pattern of activity distinct from other available agents. Clinical trial information: 2012-005428-14.

Osteosarcomas (OSs) are a group of neoplasms originating from bone cells, usually presenting in three specific age groups: children, young adults, and the elderly. High-grade OS is an extremely malignant tumor mainly due to evolution into metastatic disease, usually in the lungs. Survival of these patients has improved since the 1980s thanks to close cooperation between oncologists, oncological surgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Unfortunately, no progress has been made in the last 30 years and new, more effective drugs are needed. This article reviews the biological and pharmacological basis of the treatment of OS. Models of clinical pharmacology of the active drugs, toxic effects and reasons for primary and secondary resistance to old and new drugs are discussed.

During the last decades, much effort has been made to develop and test treatments for advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) able to prolong survival and improve patients’ quality of life. In this regard, eribulin represents one of the most recent and interesting discoveries. This tubulin-targeting chemotherapy demonstrated a survival benefit in MBC women who progressed after at least two prior lines of chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease (prior therapies should have included an anthracycline and a taxane, in either adjuvant or metastatic setting). Here, we described five cases of heavily pretreated MBC patients who experienced long-lasting control of disease with eribulin.

e22508 Background: Advanced OS still represents an unmet medical need. Chemotherapy and targeted therapies have only limited activity in this disease. Moreover, OS is considered a radioresistant tumor at doses conventionally achieved by EBRT. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of palliative EBRT in patients (pts) with advanced OS. Methods: Main inclusion criteria: confirmed histological diagnosis of OS; EBRT for advanced/metastatic disease deemed unresectable after multidisciplinary tumor board discussion; ECOG performance status ≤3, age ≥18 years at RT start; progressive disease at site of irradiation with symptoms (e.g., pain or neurological deficit) or involving critical structures (e.g., superior vena cava compression). Endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), PFS for RT-treated lesions (RT-PFS), best response with RT, overall survival. All survival endpoints were computed from RT start. We calculated the equivalent total dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). Results: 23 pts, 15 males, median age at diagnosis 33 (17-82), median age at RT start 36 (20-83) were included. All pts had grade 3-4 OS (12 osteoblastic; 6 chondroblastic; 5 other), 7 were metastatic at diagnosis. At time of RT, median metastatic sites were 2 (1-5), 15 pts were symptomatic (11 pain, 4 neurological deficit) and were mainly heavily pretreated [median previous chemotherapies 2 (1-5), median previous surgery 1 (0-2)]. Overall, 45 lesions underwent EBRT. Median EBRT dose per lesion was 33 Gy (IQR 25 - 46.5) with a median dose per fraction of 3 Gy (IQR 3-7.5). Calculated median EQD2 was 50 Gy (IQR 36 - 88). Median PFS, RT-PFS, and overall survival were 5 (95%CI 2-9), 11 (5-15), and 12 months (8-16), respectively. Compared to systemic progression, median progression delay of irradiated lesions was 6 months (95%CI 2 - 12). In 40 lesions evaluable for dimensional response, we observed tumor shrinkage > 30% in 7 lesions, stability in 24, and progression in 9. Conclusions: EBRT might have a role in the treatment of advanced OS. In consideration of the limited activity of medical treatments, EBRT might help in disease control in the advanced setting, delaying progression especially at critical sites.

Background Prognosis for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is dismal, with median overall survival (OS) of 8–12 months. The role of second-line therapy has been inconsistently investigated over the last 20 years. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of salvage treatment in pretreated adult type STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) excluded. Material and Methods PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized phase II/phase III trials exploring second- or beyond therapy lines in pretreated metastatic STS. Two independent investigators extracted data; the quality of eligible studies was resolved by consensus. Hazard ratio (HR) of death and progression (OS and progression-free survival [PFS]) and odds ratio (OR) for response rate (RR) were pooled in a fixed- or random-effects model according to heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and publication bias with funnel plots. Results Overall, 10 randomized trials were selected. The pooled HR for death was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.9). Second-line therapy reduced the risk of progression by 49% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76). This translated into an absolute benefit in OS and PFS by 3.3 and 1.6 months, respectively. Finally, RR with new agents or chemotherapy doublets translated from 4.3% to 7.6% (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.22–2.50). Conclusion Better survival is achieved in patients treated with salvage therapies (chemotherapy, as single or multiple agents or targeted biological agents). A 3-months gain in OS and an almost double RR is observed. Second lines also attained a reduction by 50% the risk of progression. Implications for Practice There is some evidence that salvage therapies after first-line failure are able to improve outcome in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Trabectedin, gemcitabine-based therapy, and pazopanib are currently approved drugs used after conventional upfront treatment. This meta-analysis reviews the benefit of new agents used in randomized trials in comparison with no active treatments or older agents for recurrent/progressed STS. The results show that modern drugs confer a statistically significant 3-month benefit in terms of overall survival, and an increase in response rate. Despite a limited improvement in outcome, currently approved second-line therapy should be offered to patients with good performance status.

BACKGROUND. Chondrosarcoma (CS) is a rare and heterogeneous sarcoma in which, after failure of surgery and radiotherapy, chemotherapy plays only a marginal role. Different molecular pathways have been shown to be activated in CS; in particular, both isoforms of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) are expressed and phosphorylated. These observations prompted investigation of the activity of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with advanced CS in a phase 2 trial. METHODS. Between January 2007 and June 2009, patients with metastatic, nonresectable CS were treated with 400 mg of IM administered twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Two criteria determined patient trial eligibility: ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy and immunohistochemical expression of either PDGFR-α or PDGFR-β. The primary objective of the trial was objective response. As secondary objectives, the authors selected progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months, overall survival, and clinical benefit (EUDRACT number 2006-006446-33). RESULTS. Twenty-six patients were enrolled and all demonstrated PDGFR positivity and phosphorylation. No objective response was demonstrated. The 4-month PFS rate was 31% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 16%-53%). The median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 6 months-15 months). Neither long-lasting freedom from disease progression nor clinical benefit was observed. The IM dose was temporarily reduced in 60%15 of the patients because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS. IM was found to be relatively well-tolerated, but failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical activity in terms of both objective response and freedom from disease progression. Advanced CS remains an incurable disease, and effective targeted therapies are still awaited. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

This phase II study was designed in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine (VNB), fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.From 12/2003 to 12/2007, 51 women (median age 59) were treated. Performance status (PS) (ECOG) was 0-2 (median 0). The chemotherapy consisted of VNB 25 mg/sqm on day 1 added to FU and LV (following De Gramont schedule) on day 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. 518 cycles of CT were administered (median 12). Most common sites of metastatic spread were: bone, liver, lymph nodes, lung.We recorded three cases of G4 neuthropenia and in one case it was febrile; no others G4 toxicities were seen. G3 toxicities were more common, especially neuthropenia (8 patients) asthenia (4) mucositis (2) and Hand-Foot Syndrome (2). Overall response rate was 27.5% (14 patients had a PR) and disease control rate was 76.5%; 12 patients experienced disease progression. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7.70 months and overall survival (OS) was 18.70 months.Results demonstrate that the ViFL regimen has substantial activity in patients with MBC already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The combination may be considered a valid choice for the treatment of MBC. Better survival results were seen in patients with visceral metastases than bone involvement. The low response rate shows that the ViFL regimen is not suitable for the neoadjuvant setting.

Purpose: pRb2/p130, a member of the Retinoblastoma gene family, has been shown to be a powerful prognostic factor in several malignancies. We sought to evaluate pRb2/p130 protein expression and its clinical effect in patients affected with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Experimental Design: Expression of pRb2/p130 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections in 41 STSs. Results obtained were correlated with clinicopathologic variables and disease-free and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Expression of pRb2/p130 was diminished in 25 (61%) tumors, whereas the remaining ones (39%) were classified as high expressors. No correlation between pRb2/p130 expression and clinicopathologic variables was observed. However, a direct relationship between pRb2/p130 expression and clinical outcome of the patients was found in the subgroup of nonmetastatic tumors (n = 31). In univariate analysis, reduced pRb2/p130 expression was a negative prognostic factor and correlated with shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.017) survival. In multivariate analysis, reduced pRb2/p130 expression was confirmed to be an independent predictor of shorter OS when considered together with tumor stage and grading (risk ratio, 7.893; confidence interval, 1.618-38.509; P = 0.011). Conclusions: This study shows for the first time the potential prognostic value of pRb2/130 expression evaluated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections in STSs patients. pRb2/p130 immunoreactivity can be used to predict OS in patients with nonmetastatic STSs and, therefore, may represent a new prognostic marker.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the commonest mesenchymal tumors of the gastroenteric tract, and are generally believed to originate from the neoplastic transformation of the interstitial cells of Cajal, the pacemaker structures of the stomach and intestine. Exon and genetic mutations (point/deletions) are fundamental for the development of GISTs: the constitutional characteristic of this neoplasm is the presence of the cell surface Kit receptor. Kit is the product of the proto-oncogene cKit, situated in chromosome 4. Ninety-eight percent of GISTs express mutated isoforms of Kit or of PDGFRA (Platelet growth factor receptor a). Kit mutation is the basic condition for autophosphorylation of tyrosine kinase residues in proteins. Autophosphorylation initiates pathogenetic processes in Cajal cells, toward a neoplastic transformation. Imatinib mesilate and, more recently, sunitinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors, specific antagonists for Kit and PDGFRA, with good activity against GISTs. Most molecular and clinical data currently available concern imatinib. Exon mutations are strategic as prognostic and as predictive factors. In recent years, much evidence suggests that survival, response to therapy and resistance to imatinib are related to different mutations. In the near future, GIST patients will receive treatment differentiated by expressed Kit and PDGFRA mutations, thus truly individualized therapy.

High dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with folinic acid rescue is widely used to treat osteosarcoma, which predominantly afflicts children; the study investigated HDMTX pharmacokinetics (pk) in adult subjects in neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings. Twenty five patients with advanced osteosarcoma (11 females--14 males, median age 26.0 years) were treated by 12 g/m2 HDMTX 4 hour iv infusion (64 total courses, range 1-7 courses). Pk was determined by non-compartmental analysis and population pk modeling. Median (range) bioavailability pk parameters were: C(max) (maximum MTX concentration) 1149.5 microM (692-2,200), AUC(tot) (total area under curve) 6,955.1 micromol*h/l (3,477-12,681). C(max)1,000 microM gave increased histological responses (p0.05). Six covariates (height-weight-hemoglobin-AST-ALT-creatinine) were found to influence MTX volume of distribution (V) and elimination rate constant (K(el)). Toxicity was mild: only two reversible G4 events were observed, related to AUC(tot)12,000 micromol*h/l (p0.001). HDMTX pk and interpatient variability in adults are comparable to those in children. No correlation between C(max)/AUC(tot) and subject age/sex was found, even in the population pk model. The excretion mechanism is not affected by sex/age differences. HDMTX can safely be administered to adults: as in younger patients, a good clinical response can be predicted by C(max), while severe toxicity depends on highest AUC(tot) values.

e22528 Background: Elderly people represent more than 50% of STS patients, but few data are available in this population and old patients in clinical studies are underrepresented or not included. Aim of this retrospective, monoinstitutional study is to describe the activity and feasibility of first and second line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic STS. Methods: Patients older than 65, with metastatic STS of the scalp, trunk, girdles and extremities, treated and followed from February 1998 to December 2015 in an Italian referral Center for diagnosis and care of STS were included. Median Overall survival (OS) was the principal end point calculated from the start of chemotherapy to the last date of follow up or death. Response rate and toxicities related to type of administered chemotherapy were the secondary end points. Results: 134 patients (79 M, 55F) were considered, (65-70 y) 63%, (71- 75y) 25%, ( > 76 y)11% . STS histologies: mixoid and round cell liposarcomas (34%), leiomyosarcomas (25%), pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcomas (13%), Angiosarcoma (10%), Mixofibrosarcoma (6%), MPNST (4%), synovial sarcoma (2%), other histologies (6%). All the patients received at least one course chemotherapy (1-12). Mono CT was the preferred administered schedule (92%of cases). Median OS was 7.3 months; at the time of this analysis only 14 patients were alive (10%). In the first line therapy we recorded 1 CR, 14 PR and 43 SD. In second line therapy no CR, 4 PR, 23 SD. PR were recorded mainly in 65-70y old patients. Bad PS, low score in Comprehensive Geriatric Assesment (CGA), vulnerability, comorbidities, number of metastasis, were negative prognostic factors. No toxic death were recorded. 12% of the pts were recovered for febrile neutropenia, thrombocitopenia and mucositis . Conclusions: Our study confirms that elderly patients with metastatic STS is a difficult population to be treated. Only patients less aged, good PS, good GCA and 0-1 comorbidities can be treated with full dose of drug, generally with mono CT. Chemotherapy in elderly pts doesn’t produce a significant improvement in Median Survival and benefit observed support the routine use of citotoxic treatment in selected good performance status population.

The aim of this study is to compare the quality of life and the levels of anxiety and depression in a relatively large group of subjects undergoing chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma and a control group of subjects undergoing chemotherapy for the most common types of cancer. 56 soft tissue sarcoma affected patients and 56 patients with common tumours, homogeneous in regards to stages of disease and sociodemographic characteristics, were enrolled in two oncological centres in Turin, Italy. Quality of life was assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and anxiety and depression by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. All patients had ongoing chemotherapy. The comparison between the two groups shows no difference in either quality of life or in anxiety and depression. There are instead gender differences, since females in the group of common tumours show higher levels of anxiety in comparison to those affected by sarcomas, while males show, at a lower degree, the opposite trend. This study suggest that levels of Quality of Life, anxiety and depression are similar in rare and common tumours. The majority of patients are able to cope with the disease in an adaptive manner. However, for some patients the disease poses a threat to their physical and mental integrity; psychological support of these patients may reduce the development of significant morbidity and help patients to better manage the course of the disease and the effects of the treatment.

Aims and background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most important health problems in Western countries: it is the fourth cancer in terms of incidence and the second cause of cancer death. Surgery is the main therapeutic choice and there is broad consensus on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) after resection. Unfortunately, 50% of the patients will relapse and die of the disease. Palliative CT based on 5-fluorouracil (5FU) may induce a 9-48% response rate with a median survival of 11.5 months. At present there is no gold standard for CT in advanced CRC and the situation has become more complicated since the advent of new drugs (Raltitrexed, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin). The aim of this study was the identification of the different approaches to treatment of advanced CRC among the clinicians (oncologists, radiologists, internal medicine specialists, surgeons) who practice CT. Methods and study design Forty-six clinicians from two Italian Regions (Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta) were interviewed by telephone. Results 5FU modulated with Lederfolin according to the classic Machover scheme is the main option in daily practice. More sophisticated therapies are reserved to patients with a good performance status (PS) and are prescribed only in the larger centers. The planned therapies usually consist of six courses. Restaging may be performed after three or six courses. A marked difference has been recorded in the evaluation of a situation of no change (NC): 25.5% of the clinicians evaluate stable disease as a positive result. In the event of disease progression or relapse, 35% of the clinicians do not prescribe second-line CT. In case of further treatment, the options are totally subjective. Conclusions A national survey on this issue is necessary under the auspices of AIOM (Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica) and involving oncologists, epidemiologists and statisticians, in order to define the reasons for variations in therapy in advanced CRC and determine the differences between clinicians of different age, specialization and location. This survey could lead to a definition of guidelines for the treatment of advanced CRC.

Irinotecan (IRI) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor active as first- or second-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Its combination with fluorouracil (FU) increases the response rate and prolongs survival. In order to identify a new effective and less toxic schedule of administration, we planned this phase II study with weekly IRI and protracted venous infusion of FU (WI-FI regimen). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary aims were to detect toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts).On May 2000, a monoinstitutional study commenced with the following schedule of administration: IRI 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 plus a 28-day protracted venous infusion of FU 200 mg/m2/day. The treatment was repeated every 35 days. Cycles were administered until a maximum of 6 courses, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.By March 2005, 52 patients (30 males and 22 females) had entered the study. Their median age was 61.5 years and the median ECOG PS was 1. In total, 223 courses were administered (median 5 cycles/patient). Toxicity was low: neutropenia G3 and asthenia G3 were the most observed toxicities (5 pts each). No other grade 3-4 toxic side-effects were seen. Weekly IRI was interrupted in 11 pts, mostly related to problems with the central venous catheter. Following RECIST criteria, we observed 5 complete responses, 15 partial responses, 17 pts had stable disease, while in 15 disease progressed. The overall response rate was 38.5% and the disease control rate was 71.2%. Thirteen pts underwent surgical resection of their relapsing disease. The median PFS was 8.2 months and the median OS was 16.3 months.The WI-FI regimen is an active treatment with a good safety profile in patients with CRC. The low incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities justifies further evaluation of this combination.

10570 Background: In soft tissue sarcomas (STS) after complete (marginal/wide/radical margins) surgery, surveillance should be tailored to individual patient’s (pts) risk that depends on histotype,...

e20646 Background: Nausea and fatigue are common side-effects of cancer chemotherapy (CT). Management of fatigue includes pharmacological treatments, psycho-educational and exercise programs. Exerc...

e11547 Background: Fulvestrant (F) is a pure antiestrogen drug approved for MBC of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive disease. The CONFIRM trial has recently demonstrated that a double dose (500 mg/monthly) of F is superior to 250 mg/monthly dose as PFS in MBC. In elderly (age >65 years) patients (pts) HT is the preferred choice when disease is hormone sensitive. The aim of our study was to determine the comparative activity, toxicity and feasibility of two different schedule of F in elderly women with MBC. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out in elderly MBC pts treated between 2006-2013 with F after at least one HT. Pts received F 250 or 500 mg im every 28 days until progression. Median age was 70,5 years (66-84). ER e PR status was known in all pts: ER+/PR+ were 56 (94%), ER+/PR- 4 (6%). Histological type were: ductal 52 (86,6%), lobular 8 (13,4%). HER 2 was positive in 4 (6%) pts. All pts were metastatic: 20 (33%) with bone metastasis alone, 40 (66%) with visceral involvemen...

We report the first case of recurrent ifosfamide-related neurotoxicity in the same patient following two distinct administrations of the drug at different doses and schedules and with a long interval between the two episodes. Remarkably, the first event was characterized by confusion and hallucinations, while the second, 29 months later, was characterized by partial and generalized seizures. Between the two episodes the patient had received high-dose cyclophosphamide, an oxazophoshorine agent closely related to ifosfamide, without any neurological side effects. We briefly discuss the diagnosis and management of ifosfamide-related encephalopathy.

10572 Background: In STS third line treatment is poorly defined. However many patients (pts), after aggressive therapy as first and second line progress in their disease ask to be treated. Oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) was already used in breast cancer, prostate cancer and in elderly pts with STS with favourable results. Aim of our study was to define the feasibility, tolerability and activity of oral CPM as third line and further line chemotherapy Methods: 45 pts (19 M; 26 F) with advanced or metastatic STS heavily pretreated were included. Oral CPM was given daily at total dose of 50 mg/day without interruption excepted for toxicity or progressive disease Results: Median age was 60 (32-81), histological subtypes were: leiomyosarcoma 12, liposarcoma 10, condrosarcoma 5, sinovialsarcoma 4, sarcoma NOS 4, other 10. Primary sites were: extremities 21, retroperitoneum 19, trunk 5. 41 pts were metastatic, 4 locally advanced. 41 pts were pretreated with chemotheraphy (15 were in II line, 17 in III line, 7 in IV line, 2 in V line). Median PS (ECOG) was 2 . Median duration of theraphy was 4 months (1-38). Progression free survival (PFS) ranged from 0 to 42+ months (median 4 months). Treatment was well tolerated, we registred only one episode of leucopenia G2 and one of asthenia G2. No complete responses were seen. Only 3 minimal responses and 18 stable disease were seen. Conclusions: Oral CPM showed a mild activity and good tolerability in advanced soft tissue and metastatic STS. It could be an appropriate solution as second line and further therapy and in unfit or elderly pts.

10055 Background: STS are 1% of malignant tumors in adults. Rarity, heterogeneity in presentation, low expertise in primary care physicians (PCP) or in general hospitals, organisation problems in specialized centers may cause a delay in both diagnosis and treatment. Aim of this study is to acknowledge the barriers to optimal care and the consequences of the delay on prognosis. Methods: Patients with STS of the extremities, trunk, retroperitoneum treated and followed from 1999 to 2011 by the same multidisciplinary group were included. Time and pattern of symptoms onset, anatomic site, tumor volume, patients’ age, gender and home, interval between diagnosis and surgical treatment or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; time to start adjuvant RT or CT were considered in a univariate - multivariate analysis. Results: 449 adult patient (53% F, 47% M, median age 55 years) were followed for a median time of 116.38 months. 65.7% of STS were at the extremities, 17.6% retroperitoneal, 16.7% at the trunk wall. Median volume at diagnosis was 8 cm for trunk and extremities; 15 cm for retroperitoneum. Commonest histologies: liposarcoma. 18.2%; leiomyo 16.8%; mixofibro 13.6%. Increasing mass, pain, and abdominal disconfort were the main revealing signs of diseases. Median time of delay were: from onset of symptom to first medical visit 68 days for trunk and extremities, 82 for retroperitoneum; 104 days from symptoms to histological diagnosis; 129 days from symptoms to start of therapy. Time to surgery after definitive diagnosis was 12 days in extremities and 21 in abdomen. Adjuvant CT started 22 days after surgery for extremities, 25 in trunk, 35 in retroperitoneum. RT initiated after 78 days. Longer delay in treatment lead to worse prognosis: MS 89.95 months if delay was > 3 months; 190.40 months if wait was < 3 months (p 0.007). Conclusions: Low self consciousness of the patient; misdiagnosis or inadequate approach in general hospitals; late referral to specialized centres are 75% of the cause of wasted time. Organization problems at the referral Centre concur for 25% of delay. Guidelines implementation and educational programme among general population and PCP are necessary.

10086 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has a well established role in multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Unfortunately no sure predictive factors have been identified in order to screen those patients who are going to benefit from NACT. Topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) is a positive target for anthracyclines. Bcl-2 is a molecular target for alchilants. P-glycoprotein gp170 is a member of multidrug resistance (MDR) complex. This study aimed to evaluate if topo IIα, gp170, bcl-2, tumor burden and histology could predict the response to NACT in locally advanced STS of the extremities. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with STS of the extremities (median age 61 yrs, range 35-82) received a median of 3 cycles of Epirubicine and Ifosfamide as NACT. Topo IIα, gp170, bcl-2 were assessed by IHC either on pre-treatment biopsies and on post-treatment surgical specimens. Bioptical specimens were categorized in low and high expression according to a cut-off corresponding to the median value ...

10060 Background: CS is a rare and heterogeneous disease in which, after failure of surgery and radiotherapy, chemotherapy has a marginal role, if any. Different molecular pathways were shown to be...

e21509 Background: Primary sarcomas of the lungs and mediastinum are rare and few data are reported on treatment and results of therapy. Methods: We reviewed our experience from 1980 and 2008 including 31 patients (pts). Pts characteristics: median age 41 (19–80 y), male/female 19/12; symptoms at diagnosis: dyspnoea (42%), chest and shoulder pain (39%), cough (35%), hemophtoae (13%), discomfort (10%). 4 pts had a previous history of mediastinal radiation for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's linfomas. 5 mediastinal tumours were located as follows: 2 in anterior part, 1 in posterior and 2 in the middle (sarcomas of the heart). 26 lung sarcomas presented as a singular mass in 23 cases and as a metastatic disease in 3. Results: In 20/31 cases the tumour was immediately resected (3 mediastinal masses and 17 lung sarcomas). In 8/31 cases only biopsy was possible. FNA was done in 25 pts. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 4 cases (3 resected). Resection was complete in 11/23 cases and in 12/23 incomplete. The histology were: peripheral nerve tumour 7, leiomyosarcoma 4, MFH 2, fibrosarcoma 2, liposarcoma 1, angiosarcoma 2, undifferentiated sarcoma 1, solitary fibrous tumour 2, rhabdomyosarcoma 2, synovialsarcoma 2, pulmonary artery sarcoma 1, pleuropolmonary blastoma 1, malignant hemangiopericytoma 1, mixoid chondrosarcoma 1, ectopic osteosarcoma 1, aggressive fibromatosis 1. Only 4 pts received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 11 adjuvant CT, 5 exclusive CT + RT for inoperable disease. Radiotherapy was completed in 26 pts (21 adjuvant). Local relapse or metastatic progression were recorded in 16/23 pts and 12 received one or more lines of palliative CT. Data about survival are disposable only for the more recently recorded pts (1998–2008: 17 pts). Of these only 8 are alive (2 with disease). Volume of disease, complete resection and grading are the dominant prognostic factors. Conclusions: Primary sarcomas of the lungs and mediastinum have a very severe prognosis. Surgical resection is the fundamental therapy, but in the future the role of neoadjuvant CT will increase. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9551 Background: Sarcoma are rare tumors, with an incidence No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3681 Background: Oral Capecitabine (CAP) is a highly effective chemotherapy agent for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC), demonstrating superior antitumour activity and an improved safe...

9035 Background. Results of CT in MSTS remain disappointing. Only 3 agents are active (Adriamycin, Ifosfamide, Deticene) with RR of 16–25% as single agent and 20–40% in poliCT. The 2nd line is more frustrating. The same drugs at different doses or schedules therapy offer 10–15% objective responses, TTP of 3–4 months and MS of 10–12 months. HDI (12–16 g/m2) on continuous intravenous infusion has demonstrated significant antitumor activity. Two different schedules have been published: 4 days c.i. (Le Cesne, JCO 1995) and 14 days c.i. (Frustaci & Comandone Proc ASCO 1998) with the same total dose of 14 g/m2. Methods. We treated from 1996 to 2003 90 pts with pretreated MSTS using both schedules. We report the results of the two protocols as perspective phase II trials independently analyzed. 90 pts with measurable MSTS previously treated with Antracyclines entered the study. Both sexes, age from 18 to 70 years, histological demonstration, PS 0–2 ECOG, good renal and hematological function, informed consent we...