Search

Background: Nirsevimab is an extended half-life monoclonal antibody (mAb) licensed for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract disease in neonates, infants and medically vulnerable children. We characterized RSV isolates recovered from participants enrolled in MEDLEY: a randomized, palivizumab-controlled phase 2/3 trial of nirsevimab in infants born preterm and/or with congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease of prematurity., Methods: Participants were assessed in two RSV seasons (Season 1 and 2). Season 1 participants were randomized (2:1) to receive a single dose of nirsevimab (50 mg if weight <5 kg or 100 mg if weight ≥5 kg in Season 1; 200 mg in Season 2) followed by four monthly doses of placebo, or five once-monthly doses of palivizumab (15 mg/kg weight per dose). Season 2 participants continued nirsevimab and placebo (nirsevimab/nirsevimab) or were re-randomized (1:1) to switch to nirsevimab (palivizumab/nirsevimab) or continue palivizumab (palivizumab/palivizumab). Cases of RSV infection were identified by central testing of nasal swabs from participants seeking medical attention for respiratory illnesses. Nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions were assessed via microneutralization assay., Results: Twenty-five cases of confirmed RSV infection were observed during the trial and sequenced: 12 in nirsevimab recipients and 10 in palivizumab recipients during Season 1, and 1 case in each Season 2 group. Molecular sequencing of RSV A (n = 14) isolates detected no nirsevimab binding site substitutions, and 3 palivizumab neutralization-resistant substitutions (Lys272Met, Lys272Thr, Ser275Leu). The nirsevimab binding site Ile206Met:Gln209Arg and Ile206Met:Gln209Arg:Ser211Asn substitutions were the only anti-RSV mAb binding site substitutions detected among RSV B isolates (n = 11). Nirsevimab neutralized all nirsevimab and palivizumab binding site substitutions in RSV A and B isolates recovered from MEDLEY participants., Conclusion: No binding site substitution detected during MEDLEY affected RSV susceptibility to nirsevimab neutralization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Kevin M. Tuffy, Bahar Ahani, Hong Ji, Vaishali S. Mankad, Ulrika Wählby Hamrén, Tonya Villafana, Yingyi Wang and Deidre Wilkins are current employees of AstraZeneca and may hold AstraZeneca stock or stock options. Elizabeth J. Kelly is a former employee of AstraZeneca and a current employee of Sanofi and may hold stock or stock options for both institutions. Ulrika Wählby Hamrén, Tonya Villafana and Deidre Wilkins are named inventors on patents planned, issued or pending related to nirsevimab. Joseph B. Domachowske has received funding to their institution for the conduct of clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Merck and Regeneron, honoraria from Sanofi and has participated in advisory boards for GSK and Sanofi. Kenji Furuno has received honoraria from AstraZeneca and AbbVie. Shabir A. Madhi has received funding from AstraZeneca, Novavax, Providence, Gritstone and ImmunityBio for the conduct of clinical trials; institutional grants from the Bill and Malinda Gates Foundation, GSK, Pfizer and Minervax, honoraria from GSK and MSD and is a member of Data Safety Monitoring Boards for PATH and CAPRISA., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pregnant people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience higher risk for severe disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but no pharmacokinetic (PK) data exist to support dosing of COVID-19 therapeutics during pregnancy. We report PK and safety data for intravenous remdesivir in pregnancy., Methods: IMPAACT 2032 was a phase 4 prospective, open-label, nonrandomized opportunistic study of hospitalized pregnant and nonpregnant women receiving intravenous remdesivir as part of clinical care. Intensive PK sampling was performed on infusion days 3, 4, or 5 with collection of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Safety data were recorded from first infusion through 4 weeks after last infusion and at delivery. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CI]) of PK parameters between pregnant and nonpregnant women were calculated., Results: Fifty-three participants initiated remdesivir (25 pregnant; median gestational age, 27.6 weeks; interquartile range, 24.9-31.0 weeks). Plasma exposures of remdesivir, its 2 major metabolites (GS-704277 and GS-441524), and the free remdesivir fraction were similar between pregnant and nonpregnant participants. Concentrations of the active triphosphate (GS-443902) in PBMCs increased 2.04-fold (90% CI, 1.35-3.03) with each additional infusion in nonpregnant versus pregnant participants. Three adverse events in nonpregnant participants were related to treatment (1 grade 3; 2 grade 2 resulting in treatment discontinuation). There were no treatment-related adverse pregnancy outcomes or congenital anomalies detected., Conclusions: Plasma remdesivir PK parameters were comparable between pregnant and nonpregnant women, and no safety concerns were identified based on our limited data. These findings suggest no dose adjustments are indicated for intravenous remdesivir during pregnancy., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04582266., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. M. B. has received consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare. K. B. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc and ViiV Healthcare paid to her institution. D. S. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare paid to his institution. A. A. serves on scientific advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, Inc and ViiV Healthcare; is a site principal investigator for a multisite and investigator-initiated studies with Gilead Sciences, Inc; and is a consultant for Merck. E. V. C. is serving on a data and safety monitoring board for Melinta Pharmaceuticals. D. E. Y. was previously an unpaid technical advisor for the nonprofit Cover the Globe and Maipelo Trust. M. M. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare paid to his institution. R. H. and K. K. are employees of Gilead Sciences, Inc and hold stock in the company. J. D. M. has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc paid to his institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Plitidepsin has shown potent preclinical activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was generally well tolerated in a phase I trial of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). NEPTUNO, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of plitidepsin in the management of moderate COVID-19 in hospitalized adult patients., Methods: Included patients had documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, required oxygen therapy, and had adequate organ function. The planned sample size was 609 patients. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to at least 3 days of dexamethasone plus either plitidepsin (1.5 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day, for 3 days) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was the time to sustained withdrawal of supplemental oxygen. Secondary endpoints included time to sustained hospital discharge, clinical status, duration of oxygen support, percentage of patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit, and safety., Results: After randomizing 205 patients, NEPTUNO was discontinued due to a notable drop in COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Available data suggest a 2-day improvement in the median time to sustained oxygen therapy discontinuation (5 vs 7 days) favoring both plitidepsin arms (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.96; P = .08 for plitidepsin 1.5 mg vs control; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, .73-1.53; P = .78 for plitidepsin 2.5 mg vs control). Plitidepsin was generally well tolerated., Conclusions: Despite the trial limitations, these results suggest that plitidepsin may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of patients requiring oxygen therapy. Further studies with plitidepsin, including those in immunosuppressed patients, are warranted.Results from this phase III trial suggest that plitidepsin, a first-in-class antiviral, may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of hospitalized patients requiring oxygen therapy for moderate COVID-19., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. V. E. has received economic support for educational talks and advisory boards from Gilead Sciences and PharmaMar SA. M. M-M. has received grants and fees for scientific advice not related with this work; received in the past 36 months from Boehringer Ing, Roche, Ferrer, Chiesi. P. V. has received provision of study materials, travel support travel from PharmaMar SA, and payments from PharmaMar SA and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). P. G-V. received speaker fees from FLS Science, PharmaMar SA (Madrid, Spain), Pfizer (Spain), and GSK (Spain); consulting fees from Angelini Pharma and PharmaMar SA; served as an advisory board member for Berlin Cures GmbH and PharmaMar SA; and received meeting grants from GSK and PharmaMar SA. A. L. has received occasional training fees from Gilead, is a member of a Data Monitoring Committee for a randomized controlled trial for Biophytis Biopharma. R. P. has received grants or contracts from MSD, ViiV Healthcare; consulting fees Pfizer, Gilead, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar SA, GSK, Atea. G. P. has received fees, as member advisory panels and consultancy, from Pfizer, MSD, Menarini, and Gilead. M. M. has received fees from Boehringer as scientific advisor and payments for lectures and educational events from GSK. J. F. has received grants and payments from Gilead, Pfizer, Shionogy, Astellas, and MSD, as well as travel support. P. R. has received fees and travel support from Gilead, Merck, VIV, and Gesida. D. L-M., E-M. S-L, F. M., J. G., and N. T. are a full-time employees of PharmaMar. J. J. holds stocks of Pangaea Oncology, has a nonremunerated role in the Scientific Advisory Board, and holds stocks of Promontory Therapeutics; is a full-time employee and shareholder of PharmaMar, S.A. (Madrid, Spain), and a co-inventor of 2 patents for Plitidepsin (WO99-42125). J. A. L.-M. is a full-time employee and shareholder of PharmaMar, S.A (Madrid, Spain), and a co-inventor of a patent for plitidepsin (WO2008135793A1). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. D. reports grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health (payments to Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, which support the author's salary). C. M. K. reports a role as chair of the patient-centered outcomes research institute Clinical Trial Advisory Panel. C. E. F. reports grants or contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a role as unpaid ad hoc committee member for the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (United Network for Organ Sharing). A. P. L. is a consulting and/or site investigator for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

The study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against omicron strains of coronavirus disease 2019 infections and determine their comparative effectiveness. This retrospective study included 716 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR group) or azvudine (FNC group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1 November 2022 and 27 February 2023. Patients in the FNC group (n = 304) were younger, exhibited less severe symptoms, started antiviral therapy later, received corticosteroids more frequently, and used tocilizumab less frequently than patients in the NR group (n = 412). Within 28 d of therapy, 40 (9.7%) and 20 (6.6%) deaths were in the NR and FNC groups, respectively. No differences were observed between drugs and mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.5, P = 0.45), clinical improvement (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-1.3, P = 0.38), and clinical progression (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.58-1.8, P = 0.96). More patients in the NR group experienced platelet decline than those in the FNC group (17.6% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.034). This study indicated that the effectiveness and safety of azvudine were comparable to those of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most significant pathogenic infections in childhood, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, there is no effective and safe drug or vaccine available for RSV. Glycyrrhizic acid (GA), an active compound derived from the natural herb licorice, has been reported to provide protection against influenza and coronaviruses, exhibiting notable antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Ephedrine (EPH) is a commonly prescribed medication for the treatment of cough and asthma, and it also demonstrates certain antiviral effects. In this study, EPH and GA were combined to form an efficient nanomaterial (EPH-GA nanogel). The self-assembly of this nanogel is driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, allowing it to serve as an antiviral nanomedicine without the need for a dual-component carrier, achieving a 100% drug loading efficiency. Oral administration of the EPH-GA nanogel significantly reduced viral load in the lungs of mice and improved lung lesions and tissue infiltration caused by RSV. Notably, we discovered that the assembled drug may create a "physical barrier" that prevents RSV from adsorbing to host cells, while free GA and EPH may compete with RSV for protein binding sites, thereby enhancing cellular uptake of EPH. Consequently, this prevents RSV infection and proliferation within host cells. Furthermore, the EC 50 values changed from 310.83 μM for EPH and 262.88 μM for GA to 68.25 μM for the EPH-GA combination, with a combination index of 0.458. In addition, the in vivo biopharmaceutic process of GA and EPH was investigated, revealing that the oral administration of EPH-GA significantly increased the bioavailability of EPH while maintaining its plasma concentration at a relatively stable level. This enhancement may contribute to a synergistic antiviral effect when combined with GA. Furthermore, the in vivo process of EPH-GA demonstrates the advantage of delivering the drug to the lesion at elevated levels, thereby facilitating its antiviral mechanism at the cellular level. In this study, we identified an effective nanomedicine, EPH-GA nanogel, which can inhibit the proliferation of RSV and mitigate lung lesions resulting from viral infection by influencing the biopharmaceutical process in vivo. This research not only offers a novel strategy for the nanomedicine treatment of RSV but also elucidates, to some extent, the compatibility mechanisms of the multicomponents of traditional Chinese medicine.

Objective: Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at elevated risk for severe outcomes, but clinical data on management of these patients are limited. Monoclonal antibodies, such as casirivimab plus imdevimab (CAS+IMD), have proven effective in treating non-pregnant adults with COVID-19, prompting further evaluation in pregnant women., Methods: A phase 3 portion of an adaptive, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of CAS+IMD (1200 mg or 2400 mg) in the treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 (NCT04425629). Participants were enrolled between December 2020 and November 2021, prior to the emergence of Omicron-lineage variants against which CAS+IMD is not active. Safety was evaluated in randomised participants who received study drug (n=80); clinical outcomes were evaluated in all randomised participants (n=82). Only two pregnant participants received placebo, limiting conclusions regarding treatment effect. Infants born to pregnant participants were followed for developmental outcomes ≤1 year of age., Results: In pregnant participants, CAS+IMD was well tolerated, with no grade ≥2 hypersensitivity or infusion-related reactions reported. There were no participant deaths, and only one COVID-19-related medically attended visit. Although two pregnancies (3%) reported issues in the fetus/neonate, they were confounded by maternal history or considered to be due to an alternate aetiology. No adverse developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age were considered related to in utero exposure to the study drug. CAS+IMD 1200 mg and 2400 mg rapidly and similarly reduced viral loads, with a dose-proportional increase in concentrations of CAS+IMD in serum. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with that reported in the general population. Immunogenicity incidence was low., Conclusion: CAS+IMD treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 showed similar safety, clinical outcomes and pharmacokinetic profiles to that observed in non-pregnant adults. There was no evidence of an impact on developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age., Trial Registration Number: NCT04425629., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TDN, MT, SG, SA, JC, AW, JX, JDD, SCI, CP, DA, DS, BK, ATD, RB, GPG, EC, NB and PD are employees and stockholders at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ATH is a Regeneron employee/stockholder and former Pfizer employee and current stockholder. KCT, JDH and GAH are Regeneron employees and stockholders, and have a patent pending, which has been licensed and receiving royalties, with Regeneron. JAB is a site PI for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. multicentred clinical trials, Enanta multicentred clinical trials and Pfizer multicentred clinical trials; a sub-investigator for Novavax multicentred clinical trials; and an advisory board/panel member for Avalere, Pfizer, Moderna, Sobi and Valneva., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Influenza virus (IV) infection currently poses a serious and continuing threat to the global public health. Developing effective prevention strategies is important to defend against infection and spread of IV. Here, we developed a triple-protective nanoshield against IV infection in the lungs, formed by self-assembling DSPE-PEG amphiphilic polymers encapsulating the flu-preventive antiviral drug Arbidol internally. The preventive effect of the nanoshield against virus infection includes increasing the viscosity in the surrounding environment to physically defend against viral entry, forming a hydrated layer to block the interaction between viruses and cells, and inhibiting virus replication. Our finding suggested that a single inhalation of the nanoshield provides effective protection against IV infection for at least 8 h. Thus, this nanoshield may be a potential pandemic protection agent against IV, especially in viral environments, where no prophylactic or therapeutic measures are available.

Intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) is used for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised children. Although the therapeutic target for treatment is unclear, studies have shown a serum area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 24h ) ≥40 mg/L·h correlates with effective CMV prevention. This study aimed to externally validate existing GCV population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models and develop a model if needed and evaluate the serum AUC 24h achieved with standard GCV dosing and propose an optimized dosing strategy for immunocompromised children. Ganciclovir drug monitoring data from two pediatric hospitals were retrospectively collected, and published pediatric PopPK models were externally validated. The population AUC 24h with standard GCV dosing (5 mg/kg twice daily) was calculated, and an optimized dosing strategy was determined using Monte Carlo simulations to achieve an AUC 24h between 40 and 100 mg/L·h. Overall, 161 samples from 23 children with a median (range) age of 9.0 years (0.4-17.0) and weight of 28.2 kg (5.6-73.3) were analyzed. Transferability of published pediatric PopPK models was limited. Thus, a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with weight and serum creatinine as covariates was developed. The median (5th-95th percentiles) steady state AUC 24h with standard dosing was 38.3 mg/L·h (24.8-329.2) with 13 children having an AUC 24h <40 mg/L·h, particularly those aged <4 years (8/13). An optimized simulated GCV dosing regimen, ranging from 2 to 13 mg/kg twice daily for children with normal renal function, achieved 61%-78% probability of target attainment. Standard GCV dosing likely results in inadequate drug exposure in more than half of the children, particularly those aged <4 years. An optimized dosing regimen has been proposed for clinical validation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir display significant variability in ganciclovir pharmacokinetics, particularly in children. Therapeutic drug monitoring currently relies on the area under the concentration-time (AUC). Machine-learning (ML) algorithms represent an interesting alternative to Maximum-a-Posteriori Bayesian-estimators for AUC estimation. The goal of our study was to develop and validate an ML-based limited sampling strategy (LSS) approach to determine ganciclovir AUC 0-24 after administration of either intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir in children. Pharmacokinetic parameters from four published population pharmacokinetic models, in addition to the World Health Organization growth curve for children, were used in the mrgsolve R package to simulate 10,800 pharmacokinetic profiles of children. Different ML algorithms were trained to predict AUC 0-24 based on different combinations of two or three samples. Performances were evaluated in a simulated test set and in an external data set of real patients. The best estimation performances in the test set were obtained with the Xgboost algorithm using a 2 and 6 hours post dose LSS for oral valganciclovir (relative mean prediction error [rMPE] = 0.4% and relative root mean square error [rRMSE] = 5.7%) and 0 and 2 hours post dose LSS for intravenous ganciclovir (rMPE = 0.9% and rRMSE = 12.4%). In the external data set, the performance based on these two sample LSS was acceptable: rMPE = 0.2% and rRMSE = 16.5% for valganciclovir and rMPE = -9.7% and rRMSE = 17.2% for intravenous ganciclovir. The Xgboost algorithm developed resulted in a clinically relevant individual estimation using only two blood samples. This will improve the implementation of AUC-targeted ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring in children., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: The potential efficacy of early combination therapy, based on an antiviral plus a monoclonal antibody, for COVID-19 in severely immunocompromised patients is matter of debate., Objectives: Our aim was to describe the impact on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 treatments in severely immunocompromised individuals, evaluating differences between a combination and a monotherapy., Methods: We included severely immunocompromised outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received an early treatment (either monotherapy with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir or the combination of an antiviral plus sotrovimab). We then assessed differences between the two treatment strategies on three main outcomes (30-day mortality, access to emergency department, hospitalization), separately and as a composite by using a propensity score weighted (PSW) approach., Results: Eighty one severely immunocompromised patients were included, 39 receiving early combination therapy and 42 receiving monotherapy. No significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rate and hospitalization rate between subjects in the two groups, while access to the emergency department following treatment administration was significantly higher in people who received a combination therapy. After applying the PSW, it was observed that combination therapy impacted favourably on the composite outcome, in a statistically significant fashion. In addition, PSW approach for mortality showed that age was the only significant factor influencing the death as stand-alone outcome., Conclusions: Early combination therapy showed a favourable impact on a composite outcome (including mortality, hospitalizations and access to emergency department) in severely immunocompromised hosts who were all vaccinated. However, further studies are needed to support our results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Bepirovirsen is a developmental antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. No pharmacokinetic (PK) studies comparing participants with hepatic impairment (HI) and healthy participants (HPs) have been conducted with ASOs. Given the target patient population, characterization of bepirovirsen PK in HI was imperative. This phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT04971928) evaluated the PKs of a single 300-mg dose of bepirovirsen in participants with HI and matched HPs, enrolled in 2 parts (Part 1: moderate HI; Part 2: mild HI). If no predefined difference in the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (predose) to infinite time (AUC 0-∞ ) and maximum observed concentration (C max ; geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0.5-1.5) was identified in Part 1, findings were applied to mild HI, eliminating Part 2. Participants were monitored for 50 days post-treatment and noncompartmental analysis estimated PK parameters. Twenty-four participants (moderate HI, n = 12; HP, n = 12) received bepirovirsen and completed Part 1. AUC 0-∞ and C max were lower in participants with moderate HI (GMR 0.69 and 0.67, respectively) than in HPs, while apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent terminal phase volume of distribution (Vz/F) were higher (GMR 1.44 and 1.64, respectively), but fell within the predefined thresholds of difference for this study. Part 2 was omitted. Adverse events were mild. Moderate HI did not have a clinically relevant impact on bepirovirsen PK or safety., (© 2024 Glaxo Group Limited. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: During the ongoing outbreak of clade II monkeypox virus (MPXV), many U.S. patients were prescribed tecovirimat, an antiviral drug that was made available under an expanded access Investigational New Drug (EA-IND) program. We evaluated EA-IND data to summarize characteristics of treated patients, outcomes, and serious adverse events (SAEs)., Methods: We evaluated data from patients prescribed tecovirimat from May 29, 2022, through July 10, 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, clinical courses, and outcomes were evaluated via intake forms, outcome forms, and patient diaries. Data were summarized in aggregate by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and by comorbidities of special interest. Reported SAEs were also compiled., Results: Tecovirimat was prescribed for over 7100 patients in the United States, most often for lesions in sensitive anatomical areas, such as certain anogenital lesions (83.5%; 5135 out of 6148 patients), and pain (52.5%; 3227 out of 6148 patients). The demographic and clinical characteristics mirrored those of patients worldwide. Among the 7181 patients with returned intake forms, 1626 also had returned outcome forms (22.6%). Many patients with severe immunocompromise (e.g., HIV with CD4 counts <200 cells/μl) received multiple courses of tecovirimat (43.1%; 22 out of 51 patients), including intravenously, and often experienced poor outcomes (35.3%; 18 out of 51 patients). Overall, 223 SAEs and 40 deaths were reported. Most SAEs were among patients who were severely immunocompromised, one of whom experienced hallucinations after tecovirimat was administered at twice the standard dose., Conclusions: Tecovirimat was used extensively. The returned EA-IND data suggest that life-threatening or protracted infections occurred in persons who were severely immunocompromised. SAEs were not commonly reported. The EA-IND data are not definitive; controlled clinical trial data are essential to elucidating if and how tecovirimat should be used.

Background and Objectives: Immunocompromised children may have increased risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), potentially leading to prolonged hospitalization, intensive care, and death. The open-label phase II MUSIC trial evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of nirsevimab, an extended half-life monoclonal antibody against RSV, in immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months., Methods: Participants received a single intramuscular injection of nirsevimab (first RSV season: 50 mg if <5 kg/100 mg if ≥5 kg; second season: 200 mg). Safety, antidrug antibodies, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated to day 361., Results: Participants (n = 100) had ≥1 immunocompromising conditions: primary immunodeficiency (n = 33), previous transplantation (n = 16), HIV infection (n = 8) or treatment with high-dose systemic corticosteroids (n = 29), immunosuppressive chemotherapy (n = 20), or other immunosuppressive therapies (n = 15). Six children experienced eight treatment-related adverse events (none categorized as serious). Three deaths occurred, all were unrelated to treatment. Eleven children, developed antidrug antibodies, with minimal effects on pharmacokinetics and no apparent impact on safety. Nirsevimab serum concentrations at day 151 were similar to those effective in preventing medically attended RSV LRTI in healthy infants. Fourteen children had increased nirsevimab clearance. No protocol-defined medically attended RSV LRTIs occured through day 151., Conclusions: Among immunocompromised children aged ≤24 months, nirsevimab was well tolerated with no safety concerns and serum concentrations were supportive of efficacy. A subset of children with increased nirsevimab clearance, had conditions potentially associated with protein loss; however, the impact on efficacy is unknown.

Background: Evidence for the effect of favipiravir treatment of acute COVID-19 on recovery, hospital admissions and longer-term outcomes in community settings is limited., Methods: In this multicentre. open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised controlled trial participants aged ≥18 years in the community with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and symptoms lasting ≤14 days were randomised to: usual care; usual care plus favipiravir tablets (loading dose of 3600 mg in divided doses on day one, then 800 mg twice a day for four days); or, usual care plus other interventions. Co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery and hospitalisation/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Recovery at six months was the primary longer-term outcome., Trial Registration: ISRCTN86534580., Findings: The primary analysis model included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive mostly COVID vaccinated participants, randomised to favipiravir (n = 1829), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3726). Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the favipiravir group than usual care (estimated hazard ratio 1·23 [95% credible interval 1·14 to 1·33]), a reduction of 2·98 days [1·99 to 3·94] from 16 days in median time to self-reported recovery for favipiravir versus usual care alone. COVID-19 related hospitalisations/deaths were similar (estimated odds ratio 0·99 [0·61 to 1·61]; estimated difference 0% [-0·9% to 0·6%]). 14 serious adverse events occurred in the favipiravir group and 4 in usual care. By six months, the proportion feeling fully recovered was 74·9% for favipiravir versus 71·3% for usual care (RR = 1·05, [1·02 to 1·08])., Interpretation: In this open-label trial in a largely vaccinated population with COVID-19 in the community, favipiravir did not reduce hospital admissions, but shortened time to recovery and had a marginal positive impact on long term outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Drs. Saville, Berry, Detry, Fitzgerald and Saunders report grants from The University of Oxford, for the Sponsor's grant from the UK NIHR, for statistical design and analyses for the PRINCIPLE trial during the conduct of the study. Prof de Lusignan is Director of the Oxford-RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre and reports that through his University he has had grants outside the submitted work from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Seqirus and Takeda for vaccine related research, and membership of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Seqirus. Profs Hobbs and Butler reports grants from UKRI, during the conduct of the study. All other authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Amenamevir is an oral once-daily antiherpesvirus drug that can be administered without dose adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. There are currently no clinical data on immunocompromised patients with herpes zoster treated with amenamevir. Therefore, an exploratory study of the efficacy and safety of amenamevir against herpes zoster in patients with immunosuppression was conducted. Inclusion criteria included patients with acute herpes zoster receiving immunosuppressive drugs or those with malignant tumors or autoimmune diseases. Twenty-four patients were included and received amenamevir (400 mg once daily after meals) for up to 14 days. The primary end point of overall improvement in skin symptoms 7 days after treatment initiation (day 7) was 58.3% for "markedly improved" and 20.8% for "improved." The combined improvement rate was 79.2% (95% confidence interval, 57.8-92.9), and 20.8% of patients experienced "worsened" symptoms. The secondary end points of overall improvement in skin symptoms on day 14 and day 28 were 95.7% and 100%, respectively. The skin symptoms progressed during treatment, peaking on day 7, and then began to heal. By Kaplan-Meier estimation, the median periods to complete crusting and healing were both day 14. There were five adverse events with a possible causal relationship to amenamevir (bacterial skin infection, anemia, hyponatremia, headache, and abnormal liver function) in one of the 24 patients. Although the bacterial skin infection was severe, all events in this patient were reported to be either recovered or recovering. These findings indicate that amenamevir can be effective and safe in immunocompromised patients with herpes zoster. However, as worsening can happen around day 7, it is necessary to carefully monitor such patients and switch to other therapies such as intravenous acyclovir if necessary. Clinical trial identifier: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190208., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Introduction: Insurance coverage for oral valganciclovir (VGCV) began in Japan in April 2023 on the basis of results, including our clinical trials for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. The VGCV treatment is available throughout Japan, so clinicians must consider the likelihood of hearing improvement and the possibility of neutropenia before dosing., Materials and Methods: We performed a substudy of an investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial in which 24 infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease were orally administered 16 mg/kg VGCV twice daily for 6 months as an intervention. We examined the infants' baseline characteristics associated with improved hearing impairment or a severely reduced neutrophil count., Results: Of the 24 patients, 4 had normal hearing on assessment of their ear with the best hearing. Hearing impairment improved in 14 patients and did not respond to VGCV treatment in 6 patients at the 6-month hearing assessment. CMV DNA levels in plasma at baseline were higher in patients in whom hearing did not respond to treatment. A neutrophil count <500/mm 3 occurred in 5 (21%) patients for the first 6 weeks and in 8 (33%) patients for the first 6 months. A neutrophil count at screening and the lowest neutrophil count over the 6 months showed the highest correlation (r = 0.477, p = 0.019)., Conclusions: Infants with a low plasma viral load at screening tend to have an improvement in hearing impairment. Clinicians should be aware of neutropenia during VGCV treatment particularly in patients with a low neutrophil count during screening., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharm Corp. provided Valixa™ dry syrup during the study period for treatment, but this company had no role in this clinical trial. None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Systematic treatment with intravenous acyclovir is usually given when varicella zoster virus (VZV) DNA is isolated in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), indicating central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Our study aimed to describe therapeutic management and acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence during acyclovir treatment of VZV infection with CNS involvement., Methods: Multicentre, retrospective study including all patients from 2010 to 2022 with VZV DNA in CSF. Patient management and outcomes were compared according to clinical presentation and indications for intravenous acyclovir: i) definite (encephalitis, myelitis or stroke, peripheral nervous system (PNS) with ≥ 2 roots, herpes zoster ≥ 3 dermatomes, immunosuppression), ii) questionable (1 or 2 dermatomes) or iii) no indication (other situations)., Results: 154 patients were included (median age 66 (interquartile range 43-77), 87 (56%) males); 60 (39%) had encephalitis, myelitis or stroke, 35 (23%) had PNS involvement, 37 (24%) had isolated meningitis, 14 (9%) had isolated cutaneous presentation, and 8 (5%) had other presentations. Overall, 128 (83%) received intravenous acyclovir for more than 72 h. AKI occurred in 57 (37%) patients. Finally, 42 (27%) and 25 (16%) patients had respectively no or a questionable indication for intravenous acyclovir, while 29 (69%) and 23 (92%) of them received it for more than 72 h, with AKI in 13 (35%) and 13 (52%) patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12% ( n  = 18), and no deaths were reported in isolated meningitis., Conclusions: Intravenous acyclovir is widely prescribed when VZV DNA is isolated in CSF, regardless of the clinical presentation, with a high rate of AKI. Further studies are needed to better define the value of intravenous acyclovir in isolated VZV meningitis.

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause tissue-invasive disease and indirect effects after lung transplantation (LTx) such as acute rejection episodes and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Monitoring CMV-specific cell immune recovery (CMV-CIR) after LTx can individualize CMV risks and establish better antiviral approach. This study evaluated the dynamics of CMV-CIR, using QuantiFERON-CMV assay (Qiagen Group), in the first year after LTx., Methods: Prospective observational cohort study included lung transplant recipients from December/2015 to December/2016. Universal antiviral prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/day 3 days/week for 3 months was given for CMV-seropositive recipients (R+) and only CMV-seropositive donor and negative recipient (D+/R-) received a 6-month-prophylaxis with ganciclovir and valganciclovir, on alternate days, in the first 3 months and then, 3 more months of valganciclovir. QuantiFERON-CMV was measured at the same time points of surveillance bronchoscopies. CMV infection was defined as any DNAemia detected and CMV disease with proven biopsy or antigenemia pp65 above 10 cells/300.000 neutrophils., Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. On days 45, 90, and 365 days post-LTx, 60%, 72%, and 81% QuantiFERON-CMV were reactive, respectively. Eleven patients (28.9%) presented CMV-disease and 27 DNAemia/CMV infections. Reactive tests were able to predict CMV disease only at 90 days after LTx (p = .027) but failed on DNAemia/CMV infection (p = .148). Daily prophylaxis, for D+/R- patients (13.2%), remained as an independently associated factor for not achieving reactive QuantiFERON-CMV (adjusted OR .27, 95%CI .12-.60, p = .02)., Conclusion: QuantiFERON-CMV may be another diagnostic tool to help stratify CMV-disease risk and individualized antiviral prophylaxis after LTx., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV)., Methods: Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0 × 10 9 /L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0 × 10 9 /L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection., Results: 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.

Drug delivery to central nervous pathologies is compromised by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A clinically explored strategy to promote drug delivery across the BBB is sonopermeation, which relies on the combined use of ultrasound (US) and microbubbles (MB) to induce temporally and spatially controlled opening of the BBB. We developed an advanced in vitro BBB model to study the impact of sonopermeation on the delivery of the prototypic polymeric drug carrier pHPMA as a larger molecule and the small molecule antiviral drug ribavirin. This was done under standard and under inflammatory conditions, employing both untargeted and RGD peptide-coated MB. The BBB model is based on human cerebral capillary endothelial cells and human placental pericytes, which are co-cultivated in transwell inserts and which present with proper transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER). Sonopermeation induced a significant decrease in TEER values and facilitated the trans-BBB delivery of fluorescently labeled pHPMA (Atto488-pHPMA). To study drug delivery under inflamed endothelial conditions, which are typical for e.g. tumors, neurodegenerative diseases and CNS infections, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was employed to induce inflammation in the BBB model. RGD-coated MB bound to and permeabilized the inflamed endothelium-pericyte co-culture model, and potently improved Atto488-pHPMA and ribavirin delivery. Taken together, our work combines in vitro BBB bioengineering with MB-mediated drug delivery enhancement, thereby providing a framework for future studies on optimization of US-mediated drug delivery to the brain., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is usually administered to neonates after birth; however, it can be anticipated during the prenatal period by treating pregnant women in order to reduce the severity of the congenital disease. The most commonly used treatment for CMV during pregnancy is valaciclovir; however, valganciclovir has a higher potency against CMV and is the first choice for neonates with congenital CMV disease., Objectives: We investigated neonatal and maternal safety of tertiary prevention in infected fetuses showing ultrasound features of infection using valganciclovir., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women and their symptomatic infected fetuses taking valganciclovir, 3 × 450 mg per day. All fetuses presented at least one prenatal feature on ultrasound. We assessed fetal/neonatal and maternal safety, as well as neonatal efficacy of treatment. The main outcome was neutropenia. Secondary outcomes included other haematological side effects, symptoms at birth and neonatal CMV-PCR was positive., Results: Seventeen women with singleton pregnancies received valganciclovir from a median (IQR) of 27.1 (26.0-30.3) to 11.6 (6.5-12.9) weeks of gestation. No neonatal neutropenia was reported. One pregnancy was terminated for severe features. Three newborns (18%) were asymptomatic at birth, including one with negative CMV-PCR from blood and saliva. CMV-PCR was positive for 12/13 symptomatic newborns, with a median (IQR) log10 viral load of 3.36 (3.30-4.20), 4.03 (1.75-4.27) and 3.04 (0.00-3.40) log10 copies/mL in blood, urine and saliva, respectively., Conclusions: Tertiary prevention by valganciclovir appears to be well tolerated for both fetus and mother. However, more extensive trials accompanied by long-term follow-up are needed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and hospital admissions in early childhood. Recent advancements in novel preventive therapies, including extended half-life monoclonal antibodies and antenatal vaccination, have afforded new opportunities to significantly reduce the burden of this infection. Nirsevimab is a novel monoclonal antibody that provides sustained protection against RSV for at least 5 months among newborns and young children. It has received regulatory approval in numerous countries and is being implemented across various settings. Two pivotal Phase 3 trials (MELODY, HARMONIE) demonstrated significant reductions in RSV-associated LRTI hospitalisations following nirsevimab administration, with treatment efficacy of 62.1% and 83.2%. Emerging real-world data from early adopters of nirsevimab corroborates these findings. Studies from Spain, Luxembourg, France and the USA report effectiveness rates between 82% and 90% in preventing RSV-associated hospitalisations among infants entering their first RSV season. Current implementation strategies for nirsevimab have primarily focused on seasonal administration for all infants, aligned to local RSV seasons, and often include catch-up doses for those born before the season begins. Available cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that while nirsevimab offers significant potential public health benefits, its adoption must carefully consider economic factors such as treatment costs, implementation strategies tailored to local viral epidemiology, and logistics for vaccine delivery. Overall, nirsevimab presents a promising opportunity to alleviate the burden of severe RSV infections in young children. However, ongoing surveillance and refinements in implementation strategies are crucial to optimise its impact and ensure sustainability across diverse health-care settings., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).)

In this quality improvement initiative, we aimed to increase provider adherence with palivizumab administration guidelines for hospitalized infants with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. We included 470 infants over four respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons from 11/2017 to 03/2021 (baseline season: 11/2017-03/2018). Interventions included the following: education, including palivizumab in the sign-out template, identifying a pharmacy expert, and a text alert (seasons 1 and 2: 11/2018-03/2020) that was replaced by an electronic health record (EHR) best practice alert (BPA) in season 3 (11/2020-03/2021). The text alert and BPA prompted providers to add "Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis" to the EHR problem list. The outcome metric was the percentage of eligible patients administered palivizumab prior to discharge. The process metric was the percentage of eligible patients with "Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis" on the EHR problem list. The balancing metric was the percentage of palivizumab doses administered to ineligible patients. A statistical process control P-chart was used to analyze the outcome metric. The mean percentage of eligible patients who received palivizumab prior to hospital discharge increased significantly from 70.1% (82/117) to 90.0% (86/96) in season 1 and to 97.9% (140/143) in season 3. Palivizumab guideline adherence was as high or higher for those with "Need for RSV immunoprophylaxis" on the problem list than for those without it in most time periods. The percentage of inappropriate palivizumab doses decreased from 5.7% (n = 5) at baseline to 4.4% (n = 4) in season 1 and 0.0% (n = 0) in season 3. Through this initiative, we improved adherence with palivizumab administration guidelines for eligible infants prior to hospital discharge., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Baloxavir marboxil is an oral, single-dose, cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor that reduces the duration of influenza symptoms and rapidly stops viral shedding. We developed a susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered (SEIR) model to inform a cost-effectiveness model (CEM) of baloxavir versus oseltamivir or no antiviral treatment in the UK., Research Design and Methods: The SEIR model estimated the attack rates among otherwise healthy and high-risk individuals in seasonal and pandemic settings. The CEM assumed that a proportion of infected patients would receive antiviral treatment. Results were reported at the population level (per 10,000 at risk of infection)., Results: The SEIR model estimated greater reductions in infections with baloxavir. In a seasonal setting, baloxavir provided incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of £1884 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus oseltamivir and a dominant cost-effectiveness position versus no antiviral treatment in the total population; ICERs of £2574/QALY versus oseltamivir and £128/QALY versus no antiviral treatment were seen in the high-risk population. Baloxavir was also cost-effective versus oseltamivir or no antiviral treatment and reduced population-level health system occupancy concerns during a pandemic., Conclusion: Baloxavir treatment resulted in the fewest influenza cases and was cost-effective versus oseltamivir or no antiviral treatment from a UK National Health Service perspective.

This study was conducted as a single-site, open-label, randomized, replicated crossover trial with 4 treatment periods. The aim was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic test drug containing velpatasvir and sofosbuvir compared to an established brand-name medication in healthy White subjects under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals up to 72 hours after dosing to measure the concentrations of velpatasvir and sofosbuvir using a certified high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations was confirmed when statistical analysis showed that confidence intervals for the log-transformed peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample were within an acceptable range from 80% to 125%. Criteria for bioequivalence were met for both area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 until the last quantifiable sample and peak concentration parameters. No adverse effects were reported during this trial in both groups., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background & Aims: Bulevirtide (BLV), a first-in-class entry inhibitor, is approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD). BLV monotherapy was superior to delayed treatment at week (W) 48, the primary efficacy endpoint, in the MYR301 study (NCT03852719). Here, we assessed if continued BLV therapy until W96 would improve virologic and biochemical response rates, particularly among patients who did not achieve virologic response at W24., Methods: In this ongoing, open-label, randomized phase III study, patients with CHD (N = 150) were randomized (1:1:1) to treatment with BLV 2 mg/day (n = 49) or 10 mg/day (n = 50), each for 144 weeks, or to delayed treatment for 48 weeks followed by BLV 10 mg/day for 96 weeks (n = 51). Combined response was defined as undetectable hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA or a decrease in HDV RNA by ≥2 log 10 IU/ml from baseline and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. Other endpoints included virologic response, ALT normalization, and change in HDV RNA., Results: Of 150 patients, 143 (95%) completed 96 weeks of the study. Efficacy responses were maintained and/or improved between W48 and W96, with similar combined, virologic, and biochemical response rates between BLV 2 and 10 mg. Of the patients with a suboptimal early virologic response at W24, 43% of non-responders and 82% of partial responders achieved virologic response at W96. Biochemical improvement often occurred independently of virologic response. Adverse events were mostly mild, with no serious adverse events related to BLV., Conclusions: Virologic and biochemical responses were maintained and/or increased with longer term BLV therapy, including in those with suboptimal early virologic response. BLV monotherapy for CHD was safe and well tolerated through W96., Impact and Implications: In July 2023, bulevirtide was fully approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) in Europe based on clinical study results from up to 48 weeks of treatment. Understanding the efficacy and safety of bulevirtide over the longer term is important for healthcare providers. In this analysis, we demonstrate that bulevirtide monotherapy for 96 weeks in patients with CHD was associated with continued improvements in combined, virologic, and biochemical responses as well as liver stiffness from week 48 at both the 2 mg and 10 mg doses. Patients with suboptimal virologic responses to bulevirtide at week 24 also benefited from continued therapy, with the majority achieving virologic response or biochemical improvement by week 96., Gov Identifier: NCT03852719., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The efficacy of different pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment strategies for achieving sustained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains controversial. This study assesses the efficacy of different PEG-IFN treatment regimens and factors influencing sustained HBsAg clearance after PEG-IFN discontinuation. PubMed , Embase , Web of Science , and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2023, regarding PEG-IFN therapy in CHB. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We explored sources of heterogeneity through univariate meta-regression. Frequentist network meta-analyses were used to compare the efficacy of different PEG-IFN treatment strategies. We analyzed 53 studies (including 9338 CHB patients). After PEG-IFN withdrawal, the annual rates of HBsAg clearance and seroconversion were 6.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.10-9.31] and 4.7% (95% CI, 2.94-7.42). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year sustained HBsAg clearance rates were 7.4%, 9.9%, and 13.0%, and the sustained HBsAg seroconversion rates were 6.6%, 4.7%, and 7.8%, respectively. HBsAg quantification, hepatitis B e antigen status, and PEG-IFN treatment protocols were major sources of heterogeneity. Baseline HBsAg quantification was significantly lower in patients with sustained HBsAg clearance versus those without ( P  < 0.046). PEG-IFN combined with tenofovir has the highest probability of achieving HBsAg seroconversion (surface under the cumulative ranking of 81.9%). Sustained HBsAg clearance increased approximately linearly from years 1 to 5 after PEG-IFN discontinuation. Low baseline HBsAg quantification has a significant impact on sustained HBsAg clearance. PEG-IFN combined with tenofovir may be optimal in achieving sustained HBsAg seroconversion., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Intérêts concurrents :: Justin Chia déclare avoir reçu des honoraires de consultation d’AbbVie, d’Arcutis, de Celgene, de Bausch Health, de Bristol Myers Squibb, d’Eli Lilly, de Galderma, de Janssen, du Groupe L’Oréal, de LEO Pharma, de Novartis, de Pfizer, de Sanofi Genzyme, de Sun Pharma, et de l’Union Chimique Belge. Elaine Dupuis déclare avoir reçu des honoraires d’AbbVie, d’Amgen, de Celgene, de Bausch Health, de Sanofi Genzyme, d’Eli Lilly, d’Arcutis, de Galderma, de LEO Pharma, de Novartis, de Sun Pharma, d’UCB Canada, de Pfizer, de Beiersdorf Canada et du Groupe L’Oréal, ou avoir occupé un rôle-conseil auprès de ces sociétés, et avoir reçu du financement pour ses déplacements lors d’une réunion de Galderma, sans lien avec les travaux soumis. La Dre Dupuis participe aussi à titre de sous-investigatrice à des études de recherche pour Eli Lilly et AbbVie, sans lien avec les travaux soumis. Aucun autre intérêt concurrent n’a été déclaré.

Background: Decision-makers in middle-income countries need evidence on the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals to appropriately prioritise these healthcare interventions., Methods: We used a dynamic transmission model to assess the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals in Fiji, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste. We conducted cost-effectiveness analysis from both healthcare and societal perspectives using data collated from publicly available sources. We developed an interactive R Shiny which allows the user to vary key model assumptions, such as the choice of discounting rate, and view how these assumptions affect model results., Findings: Booster doses were cost saving and therefore cost-effective in all four middle-income settings from both healthcare and societal perspectives using 3% discounting. Providing oral antivirals was cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if procured at a low generic price (US$25) or middle-income reference price (US$250); however, their cost-effectiveness was strongly influenced by rates of wastage or misuse, and the ongoing costs of care for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The cost or wastage of rapid antigen tests did not appear strongly influential over the cost-effectiveness of oral antivirals in any of the four study settings., Conclusions: Our results support that COVID-19 booster programs are cost-effective in middle-income settings. Oral antivirals demonstrate the potential to be cost-effective if procured at or below a middle-income reference price of US$250 per schedule. Further research should quantify the rates of wastage or misuse of oral COVID-19 antivirals in middle-income settings., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Bilgin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of severe illness in infants, with no effective treatment. Results of a phase 2 trial suggested that ziresovir may have efficacy in the treatment of infants hospitalized with RSV infection., Methods: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in China, we enrolled participants 1 to 24 months of age who were hospitalized with RSV infection. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive ziresovir (at a dose of 10 to 40 mg, according to body weight) or placebo, administered twice daily, for 5 days. The primary end point was the change from baseline to day 3 (defined as 48 hours after the first administration) in the Wang bronchiolitis clinical score (total scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater severity of signs and symptoms). The intention-to-treat population included all the participants with RSV-confirmed infection who received at least one dose of ziresovir or placebo; the safety population included all the participants who received at least one dose of ziresovir or placebo., Results: The intention-to-treat population included 244 participants, and the safety population included 302. The reduction from baseline in the Wang bronchiolitis clinical score at day 3 was significantly greater with ziresovir than with placebo (-3.4 points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -3.7 to -3.1] vs. -2.7 points [95% CI, -3.1 to -2.2]; difference, -0.8 points [95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3]; P = 0.002). The reduction in the RSV viral load at day 5 was greater in the ziresovir group than in the placebo group (-2.5 vs. -1.9 log 10 copies per milliliter; difference, -0.6 log 10 copies per milliliter [95% CI, -1.1 to -0.2]). Improvements were observed in prespecified subgroups, including in participants with a baseline bronchiolitis score of at least 8 and in those 6 months of age or younger. The incidence of adverse events related to the drug or placebo was 16% with ziresovir and 13% with placebo. The most common adverse events that were assessed by the investigator as being related to the drug or placebo were diarrhea (in 4% and 2% of the participants, respectively), an elevated liver-enzyme level (in 3% and 3%, respectively), and rash (in 2% and 1%). Resistance-associated mutations were identified in 15 participants (9%) in the ziresovir group., Conclusions: Ziresovir treatment reduced signs and symptoms of bronchiolitis in infants and young children hospitalized with RSV infection. No safety concerns were identified. (Funded by Shanghai Ark Biopharmaceutical; AIRFLO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04231968.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. E. L. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, Shionogi, Correvio, Exafield, and Menarini. D. B. reports honoraria paid to author for presentations unrelated to this work from Gilead Sciences. G. P. reports consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Takeda; payment to author for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections necessitate careful management of urinary dysfunction and retention, which are underestimated conditions. Here, we present a rare case of HSV encephalomyeloradiculitis in a 76-year-old man, whose initial symptoms included urinary dysfunction and retention that alone lasted for approximately 1 week. Unlike in meningoencephalitis, high fever and headache were absent; however, the patient subsequently developed cauda equina syndrome and consciousness disturbance. Gadolinium-enhanced spinal MRI suggested enhanced cauda equina at the L2/3 level. Upon admission, he was treated for meningoencephalitis with acyclovir and steroid pulse therapy. Subsequent cerebrospinal fluid analysis result was positive for HSV DNA. A ‍brain MRI conducted 1 week after admission displayed high-intensity lesions in the white matter of the right temporal lobe, confirming HSV encephalomyeloradiculitis. These treatments were highly effective and gradually improved the patient's condition. He was discharged 1 month after hospitalization, and the urinary catheter was removed 2 weeks later. HSV infections can cause life-threatening encephalomyeloradiculitis. Therefore, both neurologists and urologists must pay attention to their occurrence and characteristics in clinical settings.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced viral pneumonia in children is common worldwide. Its high occurrence and lack of an effective vaccine make it a leading cause of death in children. Severe RSV infection can trigger uncontrolled inflammatory responses in patients, so the development of small molecule drugs with the dual function of "direct antivirus" and "inflammatory response regulation" is welcome. Resveratrol (Res) has been reported to have antiviral and anti-inflammatory pharmacological effects, but its application is limited because of its poor water solubility and oral bioavailability. Based on small-molecule nanotechnology, we developed a sonication-assisted self-assembly method for preparing insoluble Res into highly soluble resveratrol nanoparticles (Res NPs). The obtained Res NPs exhibited a higher water solubility and a faster dissolution rate, which was more conducive to the effectiveness of Res in addressing RSV-induced viral pneumonia. In vitro studies had shown that Res NPs played an antiviral role by inhibiting RSV replication and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nebulized inhalation administration of Res NPs prolonged the drug's residence time in the lungs, which appears to increase the accumulation and effectiveness of Res NPs. Additionally, in vivo studies had demonstrated significant benefits of Res NPs in inhibiting RSV viral load and improving the pulmonary microenvironment in RSV-infected mice. Both antiviral and anti-inflammatory experiments had confirmed that the pharmacological activity of Res NPs is superior to that of Res. This suggested that nanosizing Res was an effective way to enhance the original pharmacological activity of Res and also offered a new formulation strategy for treating viral pneumonia.

Background: Studies have found dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in individuals infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF) is one of the preferred oral antiviral drugs used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but the extent to which TDF is able to affect the gut microbiota and inflammatory factors of a patient remains largely unexplored. In this study, we collected stool samples from HBV patients prior to medication and from CHB patients treated with TDF., Results: The gut microbiota and inflammatory factors were assessed in 42 healthy subjects (HC group), 109 HBV-infected subjects, including 48 CHB patients who were not medicated with nucleoside analogue drugs (No-NAs group), and 61 CHB patients who were medicated with TDF (TDF group). 16 S rRNA sequencing revealed that TDF treatment caused significant changes in the gut microbiota of HBV-infected individuals; however, the gut microbiota of HBV-infected individuals did not fully recover to a pre-dysbiosis state. The relative abundance of Bacteroidota gradually decreased from the HC group to the No-NAs and TDF groups. The relative abundance of Fusobacteriota was significantly higher in the No-NAs group than in the HC group. At the genus level, Dialister, Eubacterium&#95;hallii&#95;group, Halomonas, Collinsella, Sphingomonas, Xanthomonadaceae&#95;unclassified, and Rhizobiaceae&#95;unclassified were overrepresented; while the abundance of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium decreased significantly in the No-NAs and TDF groups., Conclusions: This study showed that TDF treatment significantly improved the regulation of the gut microbiota and aided in dysbiosis recovery. We did not observe significant improvement in serum inflammatory factor concentrations, which may be related to the relatively short duration of TDF administration in this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents a high burden of disease in children and the primary cause of hospitalization, especially in children under 1 year old. In the Valencian Community (Spain), nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, was introduced for the RSV 2023-2024 season as a universal pre-exposure prophylaxis for high-risk children and those under 6 months old. This study examines its impact, coverage, and effectiveness. The campaign achieved 88.5 % coverage and 73.7 % of effectiveness. Analysis of over 27,000 susceptible children (over 24,000 immunized), showed that those immunized exhibited a threefold reduction in RSV incidence compared to non-immunized ones. To prevent one case, the number needed to immunize (NNI) was 63. Hospitalizations due to acute respiratory infections were almost two times lower in immunized children compared to non-immunized ones (0.9 % vs 1.6 %, respectively). These first results showcase the preliminary positive impact of this public health intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and compare the incidence of hospitalization during treatment with antiviral drugs with a direct mechanism of action (riamilovir and umifenovir) in people with acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) in an outpatient setting., Materials and Methods: The study included 150 outpatients with ARVI aged 18-27 years: 50 patients received riamilovir 250 mg 3 times a day for 5 days, the second group included 50 patients who received umifenovir 200 mg 4 times a day for 5 days, 50 individuals received only pathogenetic treatment., Results: The use of direct-acting antiviral drugs was characterized by the least severity of pain and aches in the body, general weakness, and in the group of patients receiving riamilovir, the lowest severity of rhinitis, cough, and the lowest morning body temperature were recorded compared to other groups. In riamilovir group reduction in the duration of the disease was observed. The lowest frequency of ARVI pathogens detection was observed on the 6th day in riamilovir group. Outpatient treatment with riamilovir was accompanied by a minimal number of cases of the disease requiring hospitalization., Conclusion: The use of direct antiviral drugs contributes to the rapid relief of ARVI symptoms in patients receiving medical care on an outpatient basis. The antiviral drug riamilovir showed the most pronounced effectiveness (clinical and laboratory).

Background: Antiviral drugs show significant efficacy in non-severe COVID-19 cases, yet there remains a subset of moderate COVID-19 patients whose pneumonia continues to progress post a complete course of treatment. Plasma-activated water (PAW) possesses anti-SARS-CoV-2 properties. To explore the potential of PAW in improving pneumonia in COVID-19 patients following antiviral treatment failure, we conducted this study., Methods: This was a randomized, controlled trial. Moderate COVID-19 patients with antiviral treatment failure were randomly assigned to the experimental group or the control group. They inhaled nebulized PAW or saline respectively. This was done twice daily for four consecutive days. We assessed improvement in chest CT on day 5, the rate of symptom resolution within 10 days, and safety., Results: A total of 23 participants were included, with 11 receiving PAW and 12 receiving saline. The baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. The experimental group showed a higher improvement rate in chest CT on day 5 (81.8% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.036). The cumulative disappearance rate of cough within 10 days was higher in the experimental group. Within 28 days, 4 patients in each group progressed to severe illness, and no patients died. No adverse reactions were reported from inhaling nebulized PAW., Conclusion: This pilot trial preliminarily confirmed that nebulized inhalation of PAW can alleviate pneumonia in moderate COVID-19 patients with antiviral treatment failure, with no adverse reactions observed. This still needs to be verified by large-scale studies., Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; No.: ChiCTR2300078706 (retrospectively registered, 12/15/2023); URL: www.chictr.org.cn ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

COVID-19 remains a severe condition for many including immunocompromised individuals. There remains a need for effective measures against this and other respiratory infections, which transmit via virus-laden droplets that reach the nasal or oral mucosae. Nasal sprays offer potential protection against viruses. Such formulations should preserve normal nasal mucociliary function. The antiviral barrier efficacy and effects on mucociliary function of astodrimer sodium nasal spray (AS-NS) were evaluated and compared with other available nasal sprays-low pH hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC-NS), iota-carrageenan (Carr-NS), nitric oxide (NO-NS), and povidone iodine (PI-NS). Assays simulated clinical conditions. Antiviral barrier function and cell viability were assessed in airway cell monolayers, while a model of fully differentiated human nasal epithelium (MucilAir™) was utilized to evaluate tissue integrity, cytotoxicity, cilia beating frequency, and mucociliary clearance. AS-NS reduced infectious virus in cell monolayers and demonstrated a benign cytotoxicity profile. In human nasal epithelium ex vivo, AS-NS had no impact on mucociliary function (cilia beating nor mucociliary clearance). Carr-NS, HPMC-NS, NO-NS and PI-NS demonstrated limited antiviral effects, while HPMC-NS caused inhibition of mucociliary function. Astodrimer sodium nasal spray demonstrates an acceptable nonclinical efficacy and safety profile as a barrier nasal spray against respiratory viral infection in the nasal cavity., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To describe the management of haematological patients experiencing prolonged SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding, as the optimal management strategy for this condition remains undetermined., Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our prospectively followed cohort of haematological patients treated with remdesivir for more than 10 days. Starting January 2023, upon COVID-19 diagnosis, the treatment strategy was based on symptoms and PCR cycle threshold (Ct) as follows: (i) when Ct was 25 or less or if the patient had symptoms, a course of remdesivir for at least 10 days, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days (whenever possible) and convalescent plasma was administered; and (ii) when the patient was asymptomatic and had a PCR Ct of more than 25, when possible, a course of 5 days of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered. The patient was considered to have achieved viral clearance and, thus, remdesivir was stopped, in either of these cases: (i) PCR negativity, or (ii) subgenomic RNA negativity., Results: From January to November 2023, 18 patients benefited from a safe extended remdesivir administration, resulting in detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in a median time of 3.5 weeks (IQR 2.6-3.9) (min-max 1.6-8.0). No clinical or biological side effects were detected. No patient died or needed further treatment for their COVID-19 episode., Conclusions: The extended course of remdesivir, combined with other active therapies for COVID-19 infection, was well tolerated. Cure and virus negativity were obtained in all these high-risk patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs have resulted in high rates of virological cure in chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-infected patients. We used noninvasive tests to assess fibrosis in subjects who had been cured with DAA., Methods: Retrospective data collection (2014-2019) from the medical record of CHC patients at the hepatology clinic was performed. Subjects co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B, post-liver transplant, and lost to follow-up were excluded. We evaluated fibrosis at baseline and 1 year after completing therapy using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and aspartate aminotransferase-toplatelet ratio index (APRI) scores., Results: With 210 medical records reviewed, 41 were included. The mean age was 62.8 years; 61% were men. Significant fibrosis regression was observed 1-year post-treatment using 3 noninvasive methods: VCTE, APRI, and FIB-4 score. Prior to treatment, 46% of the patients had advanced fibrosis compared to 25% 1 year after treatment. The VCTE scores of 4 subjects (with body mass indices [BMIs] > 30) indicated a worsening of fibrosis. We did not find a statistically significant association between BMI and VCTE, FIB-4, or APRI score., Conclusion: In most CHC patients, DAA therapy leads to liver fibrosis regression. Obesity may play an important role in the worsening of hepatic fibrosis or the absence of fibrosis regression.