Search

Backgrounds: Baricitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2, is approved for moderate and severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with insufficient response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The study evaluated the safety of baricitinib 24 weeks 4 mg or 2 mg for the treatment of RA., Methods: The net change (least squares mean [LSM]) of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from baseline with the comparison of baricitinib versus placebo was pooled, respectively. The risk ratios (RR) of serious advanced events (SAEs), major cardiovascular events (MACEs), infection, serious infection, and advanced events (AEs) at the end of treatment across groups were compared., Results: Five randomized controlled trials with 2901 patients were included in the summary analysis. Results showed that baricitinib 4 mg significantly increased ALT and creatinine levels, the net LSM change was respectively 3.59 U/L with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.75-5.43), 4.25 µmol/L with 95% CI (3.38-5.12), however, baricitinib 2 mg of ALT and creatinine levels were not significantly different. Baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg significantly increased LDL-C levels, the net LSM change was respectively 11.44 mg/dL with 95% CI (6.08-16.80), 8.70 mg/dL with 95% CI (4.19-13.20). Baricitinib 4 mg significantly increased the incidence of infection, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.29 (1.13-1.47), and baricitinib 2 mg was not significantly different. However, the pooled RRs of SAEs, MACEs, and serious infection were not statistically significant across groups. The pooled RRs of AEs were not statistically significant between baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg., Conclusions: This study confirmed that patients with RA taking 4 mg baricitinib increased levels of ALT, creatinine, as well as an increased risk of infections, compared with those taking 2 mg baricitinib. Both 2 mg and 4 mg also increased the level of LDL-C, but it increased the most severely at 4 mg baricitinib. However, the incidence of SAEs, MACEs, and serious infection was not significantly different in patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg compared with placebo, the incidence of AEs was not significantly different between baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Tofacitinib is a targeted JAK inhibitor used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Despite some recent safety concerns, it is considered effective and safe with appropriate patient selection. Between May 2015 and May 2024, data were retrospectively analyzed from 112 patients with a diagnosis of RA in a tertiary care hospital who had received tofacitinib for at least 1 month, with or without prior biologic DMARDs. The mean disease duration was 12 years, and the median duration of tofacitinib use was 32.5 months. The p-value for all disease activity parameters evaluated for effectiveness between the 1st- and 3rd-month visits was <0.001, except CRP (p = 0.097). Adverse events occurred in 15 (13.4%) patients, with an incidence rate of 4.54 per 100 patient-years. Observed were one myocardial infarction (0.3/100 patient-years), two pulmonary embolisms (0.6/100 patient-years), three herpes zoster (HZ) (0.9/100 patient-years), and one basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (0.3/100 patient-years). Median drug-free survival was 68 (95% CI: 54.8-81.2) months. The drug was discontinued in 28 (25%) patients due to ineffectiveness and in 13 (11.6%) due to side effects. A significant difference in drug survival rates was observed between patients who had not previously used bDMARDs and those who had received at least one bDMARD before tofacitinib (p < 0.001). Drug survival was 46.35 months in the prior bDMARD group and 71.09 months in the bDMARD-naive group. This study found significant reductions in disease activity indices at 3 and 6 months after starting tofacitinib, with sustained effectiveness. Although adverse event rates were somewhat higher than reported in the literature, tofacitinib can be used effectively and safely in appropriate patient populations for RA treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Introduction: Methotrexate polyglutamates (MTXPGs) are intracellular metabolites of methotrexate (MTX) that play a critical role in the drug's activity, influencing both its efficacy and toxicity. As the exact implications of MTXPGs in these processes remain a subject of debate, a comprehensive review of MTXPGs could provide valuable insights for clinicians and pharmacists, potentially minimizing adverse reactions and enhancing therapeutic outcomes., Areas Covered: A comprehensive search of relevant literature was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases, including studies from their inception to April 2024. Eligible studies included reviews, clinical trials, and real-world analyses. Additional manual searches and citation reviews were also performed. This review aims to explore MTXPGs with a primary focus on their pharmacokinetics, analytical methods, determinants of drug exposure, and their correlation with MTX efficacy and toxicity., Expert Opinion: MTXPGs have not yet garnered significant attention in clinical practice. However, multiple studies have demonstrated a relationship between MTXPGs and the efficacy and toxicity of MTX, suggesting a potential avenue for personalized treatment strategies. Future research should aim to further validate and refine this correlation. Additionally, attention should also be directed toward other metabolites of MTX, which may hold clinical significance.

Objectives: Given the limited tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment data for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) in China, we evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ in Chinese patients with sJIA., Method: In this multicentre, interventional Phase IV study, patients with sJIA and inadequate clinical response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/corticosteroids received TCZ infusions every 2 weeks based on body weight (< 30 kg, 12 mg/kg; ≥ 30 kg, 8 mg/kg), over a 52-week open-label period and an 8-week safety follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 response and absence of fever at Week 12., Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and treated (12-mg/kg group, 34; 8-mg/kg group, 28). At Week 12, 87.1% (95% confidence interval 78.8%-95.4%) of patients had JIA ACR 30 response and absence of fever; Week 52 results were similar. The proportion of JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 responders rapidly increased at Week 12, up to Week 52. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels decreased within 4 weeks; 44/58 patients (75.9%) with elevated baseline hsCRP recovered at Week 52. Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire pain scores, disability index scores, and mean corticosteroid dose decreased over time. Height standard deviation score changes at Week 52 indicated catch-up growth. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild (serious AE incidence, 17.7%). No deaths or macrophage activation syndrome occurred., Conclusion: This is the first multicentre trial to report the efficacy and safety of TCZ in Chinese patients with sJIA at 52 weeks. No new safety concerns were found., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a formidable healthcare challenge due to its chronic nature and potential for irreversible joint damage. Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone treatment for RA but carries significant risks of adverse effects with repeated administration, necessitating the exploration of alternative delivery methods. Injectable hydrogels loaded with MTX for intra-articular injection present a promising solution, allowing sustained drug release directly into affected joints. However, current hydrogel systems often lack extended therapeutic periods and the ability to self-regulate drug release according to disease state. Furthermore, RA is associated with excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which exacerbates inflammation and joint damage. Herein, we developed an advanced injectable hydrogel (MPDANPs/MTX HA-PEG gel) based on "bio-orthogonal chemistry", combining hyaluronic acid and polyethylene glycol (PEG) matrices co-loaded with mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles (MPDANPs) and MTX. MPDANPs/MTX HA-PEG gel achieved prolonged, staged, and self-regulated MTX release, coupled with ROS scavenging capabilities for enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Due to its optimized MTX release behavior and significant ROS scavenging function, MPDANPs/MTX HA-PEG gel exhibited potent anti-inflammatory effects in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats following a single intra-articular injection. Our findings highlight the potential of MPDANPs/MTX HA-PEG gel as a highly effective treatment strategy for RA, offering a promising avenue for improving patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To develop a non-linear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model describing the change in the concentration of methotrexate polyglutamates in erythrocytes (ery-MTX-PG n with "n" number of glutamate, representing PK component) and how this relates to modified 28-joint Disease Activity Score incorporating erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS-28-3) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), representing PD component., Methods: An existing PK model was fitted to data from a study consisting of 117 RA patients. The estimation of population PK-PD parameters was performed using stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm in Monolix 2021R2. The model was used to perform Monte Carlo simulations of a loading dose regimen (50mg subcutaneous methotrexate as loading doses, then 20mg weekly oral methotrexate) compared to a standard dosing regimen (10mg weekly oral methotrexate for 2 weeks, then 20mg weekly oral methotrexate)., Results: Every 40 nmol/L increase in ery-MTX-PG 3-5 total concentration correlated with 1-unit reduction in DAS-28-3. Significant covariate effects on the therapeutic response of methotrexate included the use of prednisolone in the first 4 weeks (positive use correlated with 25% reduction in DAS-28-3 when other variables were constant) and patient age (every 10-year increase in age correlated with 3.4% increase in DAS-28-3 when other variables were constant). 4 methotrexate loading doses led to a higher percentage of patients achieving a good/moderate response compared to the standard regimen (Week 4: 87.6% vs. 39.8%; Week 10: 64.7% vs. 57.0%)., Conclusions: A loading dose regimen was more likely to achieve higher ery-MTX-PG concentration and better therapeutic response after 4 weeks of methotrexate treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Objective: The objective was to develop consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for patients with refractory moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)., Methods: The Biologics Workgroup of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance JDM Research Committee used case-based surveys, consensus framework, and nominal group technique to produce bDMARD CTPs for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM., Results: Four bDMARD CTPs were proposed: tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Each CTP has different options for dosing and/or route. Among 76 respondents, consensus was achieved for the proposed CTPs (93% [67 of 72]) as well as for patient characteristics, assessments, outcome measures, and follow-up. By weighted average, respondents indicated that they would most likely administer rituximab, followed by abatacept, TNFα inhibitor, and tocilizumab., Conclusion: CTPs for the administration of bDMARDs in refractory moderately severe JDM were developed using consensus methodology. The implementation of the bDMARD CTPs will lay the groundwork for registry-based prospective comparative effectiveness studies., (© 2024 American College of Rheumatology. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Objectives: To determine the effects of dose reduction of rituximab (RTX) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity in clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of RA patients using RTX, in stable low disease activity (i.e. Disease Activity Score 28-joint count CRP (DAS28-CRP) ≤3.5 for ≥6 consecutive months) and ≥2 DAS28-CRP measurements. We identified three treatment periods: 1) full dose RTX, 2) RTX dose reduction, and 3) stable RTX dose (and interval) after tapering. Linear mixed-model analysis was used to estimate mean DAS28-CRP during these periods. Rituximab use was assessed as the median percentage of the RTX Daily Defined Dose (%DDD) per period, with 1 x 1000 mg/6 months as reference., Results: 387 patients were included in the cohort with a median of 8 DAS28-CRP measurements (Q1-Q3:4-13) available per patient and median follow-up time of 44 months (Q1-Q3: 23-76). 299 patients tapered RTX and entered period 2 at least once, of whom 226 also entered period 3. Mean DAS28-CRP were 2.37 (95% CI: 2.29, 2.44) for period 1, 2.33 (95% CI: 2.25, 2.40) for period 2, and 2.27 (95% CI: 2.18, 2.35) for period 3, the latter significantly lower compared to period 1 (p=0.025). %DDD for the three time periods were 96%, 57% and 49%, respectively., Conclusions: Dose reduction of RTX in clinical practice is effective for many RA patients and leads to relevant dose reduction. Together with other previously proven benefits of ultra-low dose RTX, wider implementation of ultra-low dose RTX in RA patients should be considered.

Objective: Many guidelines recommend limiting glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but 40% of patients remain on glucocorticoids long term. We evaluated the cardiovascular risk of long-term glucocorticoid prescription by studying patients on stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)., Methods: Using two claims databases, we identified patients with RA on stable DMARD therapy for >180 days. Proportional hazards models with inverse-probability weights and clustering to account for multiple observations were used to estimate the effect of glucocorticoid dose on composite cardiovascular outcomes (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI])., Results: There were 135,583 patients in Medicare and 39,272 in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database. Medicare and CDM patients had an incidence of 1.3 and 0.8 composite cardiovascular outcomes per 100 person-years, respectively. In the older, comorbid Medicare cohort, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes in adjusted models with predicted one-year incidence of 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-1.6%) for ≤5 mg, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%-1.9%) for >5 to 10 mg, and 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%-2.5%) for >10 mg versus 1.1% (95% CI 1.1%-1.2%) among patients not receiving glucocorticoids. There was no significant association among the CDM cohort. However, in the subgroup of younger patients with RA and higher cardiovascular risk, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes., Conclusion: Among older patients with more comorbidities and younger patients with higher cardiovascular risk with RA on stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of MI and stroke, even at doses ≤5 mg/day. By contrast, no association was noted among younger, healthier patients with RA., (© 2024 The Author(s). Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of a single-dose anakinra during familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) attacks and its effect on the duration, severity, and frequency of attacks. The patients with FMF who had disease episode and received a single-dose anakinra during disease episode between December 2020 and May 2022 were included. Demographic characteristics, MEFV gene variants detected, concomitant medical conditions, demographics of recent and previous episodes, laboratory findings and length of hospital stay were recorded. A retrospective analysis of medical records revealed 79 attacks from 68 patients who met inclusion criteria. The patients had a median age of 13 (2.5-25) years. All patients reported that the average duration of their previous episodes lasted longer than 24 h. When the recovery time of attacks after subcutaneous anakinra application at the disease attack was examined, it was observed that 4 attacks (5.1%) ended in 10 min; 10 attacks (12.7%) in 10-30 min; 29 attacks (36.7%) in 30-60 min; 28 attacks (35.4%) in 1-4 h; 4 attacks (5.1%) in 24 h; and 4 attacks (5.1%) ended in more than 24 h. There was no patient who did not recover from their attack after a single dose of anakinra. Although the efficacy of a single-dose anakinra administration during FMF attacks in children needs to be confirmed by prospective studies, our results suggest that use of a single-dose anakinra during FMF attacks is effective in reduction of severity and duration of disease attacks., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and rheumatologists on decision aid (DA)-led tapering of advanced therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Semistructured interviews were completed with patients and rheumatologists, embedded within a pilot study of DA-led tapering (ie, dose reduction) of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) in RA. All patients were in sustained (≥ 6 mos) remission and had chosen to reduce their therapy after a DA-led shared decision with their rheumatologist. The rheumatologists included those participating in the pilot (n = 4), and those who were not (n = 8). Reflexive thematic analysis of audiotaped and transcribed interviews identified themes in the group experiences., Results: Patients (n = 10, 6 female) unanimously found the DA easy to understand and felt confident in shared decision making about treatment tapering and managing flares. Rheumatologists' (n = 12, 5 female) perspectives on tapering bDMARDs and tsDMARDs varied widely, from very supportive to completely opposed, and influenced their views on the DA. Rheumatologists expressed concerns about patient comprehension, destabilizing a stable situation, risks of flare, and extending appointment times. Despite their initial reservations about sending the DA to all eligible patients ahead of appointments, 3 of 4 participating rheumatologists adopted this approach during the pilot, which had the benefit of facilitating patient-led conversations., Conclusion: A DA-led strategy for tapering advanced therapy in RA was acceptable to patients and feasible in practice. Sending patients a DA ahead of their appointment facilitated patient-led conversations about tapering., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Aims: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), interleukin (IL)-6 affects the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Treatment with anti-IL-6 therapy can reverse the IL-6-mediated downregulation of CYP enzymes, resulting in changes in plasma levels of CYP substrates. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the IL-6 inhibitor olokizumab on the pharmacokinetics of CYP probe substrates in subjects with active RA., Methods: Seventeen patients with active RA were orally administered a phenotyping cocktail of midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), omeprazole (CYP2C19 substrate), warfarin (CYP2C9 substrate) and caffeine (CYP1A2 substrate) alone and 2 weeks after a single subcutaneous injection of 128 mg olokizumab. The pharmacokinetic parameters of each substrate were calculated using noncompartmental analysis., Results: Sixteen of 17 enrolled patients received the complete doses of the cocktail drugs and olokizumab and were eligible for the pharmacokinetic evaluations. After single-dose administration of olokizumab, the exposure of midazolam and omeprazole decreased by 30-33% and 26-32%, respectively, compared to when the substrates were administered along via cocktail. In the presence of olokizumab, caffeine exposure increased by 19-23% compared to caffeine administration alone. There were no significant changes in S-warfarin exposure., Conclusion: In patients with active RA, olokizumab potentially reverses the IL-6-mediated suppression of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. According to FDA guidance, olokizumab is considered a weak inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19., (© 2024 British Pharmacological Society.)

Objective: To report pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, clinical effect, and safety of intravenous (IV) golimumab in children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) who participated in A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab in Pediatric Participants With Active Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy (GO-VIVA)'s open-label, long-term extension (LTE) through week 252., Methods: GO-VIVA participants who continued IV golimumab (80 mg/m 2 every 8 weeks) after week 52 were included. PK and safety were assessed through week 244 (last dose) and week 252, respectively, and clinical response through week 116. Clinical outcomes included JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10). Binary outcomes used nonresponder imputation, and other descriptive analyses used observed data., Results: Of 112/127 (88.2%) participants entering the LTE, 69 completed the week 252 visit. Median steady-state trough golimumab concentrations were generally maintained from week 52 through week 244 (range 0.3-0.6 μg/mL). Antigolimumab antibody rates were consistent through week 52 (39.2% [49/125]) and week 244 (44.8% [56/125]). Week 52 JIA-ACR 30/50/70/90 response rates (75.6% [96/127], 74% [94/127], 65.4% [83/127], and 48.8% [62/127], respectively) were generally maintained through week 116 (72.4% [92/127], 71.7% [91/127], 63.8% [81/127], and 50.4% [64/127], respectively), when the median cJADAS10 was 1.6 and 56.7% (72/127) of participants achieved cJADAS10 ≤ 5 (minimal disease activity). Rates (per 100 patient-years) of serious adverse events and serious infections through week 252 were 7.7 and 3.9, respectively., Conclusion: GO-VIVA LTE participants experienced adequate PK exposure and stable safety and immunogenicity. The majority of participants experienced no more than minimal residual disease activity. Data suggest IV golimumab treatment provided durable clinical response through week 116, with an acceptable risk-benefit profile., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Background: Janus kinase inhibitors are an effective option for achieving sustained remission or low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Filgotinib is a Janus kinase 1-preferential inhibitor available in two doses for moderate-to-severe RA. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of filgotinib., Methods: In the ongoing long-term extension study FINCH 4 (NCT03025308), patients continue filgotinib 200 mg or 100 mg from FINCH 1, 2 or 3 or receive filgotinib 200 mg or 100 mg de novo. Efficacy assessments up to week 156 include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein of <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index of ≤2.8, Simplified Disease Activity Index of ≤3.3 and Boolean remission (1.0 and 2.0) with non-responder imputation., Results: In patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate, 60.2% and 54.6% receiving de novo filgotinib 200 mg and 100 mg had an ACR20 at week 156, respectively, as did 67.3% and 59.5% of those who continued filgotinib 200 mg and 100 mg. At week 156, Boolean remission 1.0 was achieved by 18.8% and 15.4% of patients treated with de novo filgotinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively, and by 21.1% and 18.5% when Boolean 2.0 criteria were applied. Similar efficacy data were seen in patients from FINCH 2 and 3. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of filgotinib., Conclusion: In FINCH 4, filgotinib 200 mg and 100 mg (continuous or de novo) demonstrated sustained efficacy up to week 156 in patients enrolled from FINCH 1, 2 or 3, with no unexpected safety results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MHB reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, CESAS Medical, Galapagos, Gilead and Pfizer (all paid to host institution); speaker fees from AbbVie (paid to host institution); and grant/research support from Gilead (paid to host institution). DA reports consultancy fees, speaker fees and grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and Sanofi. BGC reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen and Roche-Chugai; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer and Roche-Chugai. YT reports speaker fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Gilead, GSK, Pfizer, Taisho and Taiho; and research grants from Asahi Kasei, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe and Taisho. RC reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Accord, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. HS-K reports consultancy fees and speaker fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos and Pfizer. TT reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan and Gilead; and speaker fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead and Pfizer Japan. J-EG reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer; and grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly and Pfizer. RB reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer; speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi; and grant/research support from AbbVie and Roche. PV reports consultancy fees from Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma and Sidekick Health; speaker fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos and Roularta; and grant/research support from Galapagos and Pfizer. AZ-S has no disclosures of interest to report. FDL is a former employee of, and shareholder in, Galapagos. EVEO reports consultancy fees from Galapagos and Janssen and is a shareholder in UCB. VR is a former employee of Galapagos and current employee of GSK Vaccines. PE reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead and Novartis; speaker fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis and Samsung; and grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly and Samsung., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The availability of a number of bDMARDs with different mechanism of action increases potential treatment pathways in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In clinical practice, following the failure of one bDMARD, it is normal to consider which options are the best for switching strategy. In most cases this choice involves IL17i and TNFi. The main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cycling (from TNFi to another TNFi) and swapping (from TNFi to IL17i or vice versa) strategies. In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all PsA patients treated with TNFi or IL17i between January 2016 and January 2022 were enrolled. The prescriptions were clustered in one cycling group (CG), and two swap groups: from TNFi to IL17i (SG1) and from IL17i to TNFi (SG2). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were applied to compare the drug retention rates and to identify factors affecting treatment persistence. A total of 122 patients were enrolled. The CG, SG1 and SG2 2-years retention rates were 51%, 58% and 34% (p = 0.1), respectively. SG1 strategy (HR 0.53; CI 0.31-0.89; p = 0.02), age (HR 0.98; CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), Disease Activity PsA (HR 1.11; CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.0001), year of switch (HR 1.78; CI 1.39-2.22; p < 0.0001) influenced the retention rate. The findings of this real-world study, even if burdened by bias related to its observational nature, support the hypothesis that in PsA patients swapping from TNFi to IL17i might be more effective than cycling TNFis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To report long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using pooled data from three randomised clinical trials (RCT) followed by open-label extension (OLE) study., Methods: Cumulative data from three phase 3 core trials and their OLE were analysed. Safety variables assessed included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest and laboratory results. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) <3.2, CDAI remission and low disease activity (LDA), SDAI remission and LDA, HAQ-DI decrease of 0.22 unit and Boolean 2.0 remission., Results: A total of 2304 patients received OKZ in combination with MTX either once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks. Event rates per 100 patient-years in OKZ every 2 weeks and OKZ every 4 weeks, respectively, were 9.57 and 9.13 for SAEs; 2.95 and 2.34 for serious infections; 0.09 and 0.05 for gastrointestinal perforations; 0.58 and 0.83 for major adverse cardiovascular events; and 0.45 and 0.50 for malignancies. No increase in the rate of any AE was observed over 106 weeks of treatment. The evaluation of laboratory variables demonstrated the expected changes, like neutropenia, elevation of liver enzymes and blood lipids. Clinical response rates remained stable during the OLE., Conclusion: The long-term safety and tolerability of OKZ in combination with MTX remained stable. The efficacy of OKZ was maintained through week 106. These findings support OKZ as a treatment option for patients with active RA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The analysis was funded by JSC R-Pharm. EF: research grants from BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche; consulting fees from Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Galapagos, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi; speakers’ bureau for Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Galapagos, Medac, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi; RF: Consultant for AbbVie, Arthrosi, BMS, Galvani, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, InventisBio, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Proviant, Recor, UCB, Vyne; Clinical Study grants: AbbVie, Acceleron, Arthrosi, Biosplice, BMS, Cugene, Flexion, Galvani, Gilead, GSK, Horizon, Idorsia, Janssen, LG Chem, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Proviant, Sankyo, UCB, Viela. SF: consulting fees from ICON and PPD contract research organisations, shareholder of Pfizer, INC stocks, consulting fees from R-Pharm; EK: employee of R-Pharm, with no R-Pharm stock; ML: research grants from Amgen, Biogen, UCB, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, GSK, R-Pharm; EN: speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer; DB, SG, SK and MS: employee of R-Pharm, with no R-Pharm stock; JS: Editor-in-Chief of ARD, research grants from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly; consulting fees from Abbvie, Galapagos/Gilead, Novartis-Sandoz, BMS, Samsung, Sanofi, Chugai, R-Pharma, Lilly; speakers’ bureau for Samsung, Lilly, R-Pharm, Chugai, MSD, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz; RF: consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Galvani, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharm, UCB; speakers bureaus for AbbVie; Pfizer; R-Pharm. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available in the full text of this article., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objectives: Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX)., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included., Primary Endpoint: proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets., Results: The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO., Conclusions: BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted., Trial Registration Number: NCT03312907., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CA has received research support from GSK; consulting fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, BMS, Kezar Life Sciences Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme and Alumis Inc. CFA has received research support from Janssen, AbbVie, and Eli Lilly. ZA has received research support from GSK, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Amgen; and consulting fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Kezar Life Sciences Inc, and Novartis. INB has received research support from Genzyme, Sanofi, and GSK; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, GSK, and ILTOO; and has served as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca and Merck Serono. INB is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Emeritus and is funded by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). PCC has received consulting and speaker fees from GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, and Eli Lilly. WWC has received research support from GSK, UCB, Amgen, Pfizer, and BMS; consulting fees from GSK and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from GSK and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals for disease awareness presentations and curricula on achieving disease control and remission in SLE. RF has received research support and consulting fees from GSK. MBU has received research support from GSK; consulting fees from GSK and UCB; and speaker fees from GSK, Eli Lilly, and AstraZeneca. RvV has received research support for educational programmes and institutional grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Biotest, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, and Vielabio; speaker fees from AbbVie, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB; and research support from BMS, GSK Eli Lilly, and UCB. RBH, AvM, JCO-A, MO and DAR are employees of GSK and hold stocks and shares in the company. RBH is also an inventor for the following patents: US-20220195062-A1, US-11180569-B2, and US-20180265588-A1. KLC, JG, MD, YIG, DS and PPT were employees of GSK at the time of the study and hold stocks and shares in the company. NLF is a former employee and consultant for GSK and holds stocks in the company. YOT has received unrestricted research grants from GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor Pharma; and consulting fees from Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, GSK, Kezar Life Sciences Inc, Vifor Pharma, and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (paid to Leiden University Medical Center)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objectives: To demonstrate efficacy equivalence of CT-P47 and EU-approved reference tocilizumab (r-TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: This double-blind, phase III study randomised (1:1) patients to receive CT-P47 or r-TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until week 20 during treatment period (TP) 1. Prior to week 24 dosing, patients receiving r-TCZ were randomised (1:1) to continue r-TCZ or switch to CT-P47; patients receiving CT-P47 continued CT-P47 (TP2, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks until week 48). The dual primary endpoints (for different regulatory requirements) were mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) at week 12 and week 24. Efficacy equivalence was determined if CIs for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: (95% CI -0.6, 0.6 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)) at week 12 or 90% CI -0.6, 0.5 (ANCOVA with multiple imputation) at week 24). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety endpoints, including immunogenicity, were investigated. Findings up to week 32 are presented., Results: In TP1, 471 patients were randomised (234 CT-P47; 237 r-TCZ). The 95% and 90% CIs for the estimated treatment differences were contained within the predefined equivalence margins; the estimated difference in DAS28-ESR at week 12 was -0.01 (95% CI -0.26, 0.24) and at week 24 was -0.10 (90% CI -0.30, 0.10). Secondary efficacy endpoints, PKs and overall safety were comparable between groups up to week 32., Conclusions: Efficacy equivalence, alongside comparable PK, safety and immunogenicity profiles, was determined between CT-P47 and r-TCZ in adults with RA, including after switching from r-TCZ to CT-P47., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JSS has received payments to institution from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Galapagos, and Roche; personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Ananda, Astro, BMS, Celltrion, Inc., Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Immunovant, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, R-Pharma, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB; payments or honoraria from Eli Lilly; and support for meeting attendance from Eli Lilly. MK has received support for meeting attendance from Accord, Egis, Medac, and Sandoz. SJ has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Inc., Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB; and payments or honoraria from AbbVie, Celltrion, Inc., Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. RW has received speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, and UCB; support for meeting attendance from AbbVie; and is involved in the leadership of the Polish Rheumatology Society. MKW has received payments or honoraria from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, SOBI and UCB; and support for meeting attendance from AbbVie, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and SOBI. PH has received research grants from Celltrion, Inc. GB has received honoraria for consulting and lectures from Celltrion, Inc., Chugai, Fresenius, and Sanofi. EK has received consulting fees/served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Celltrion, Inc., Eli Lilly, GSK, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Samsung Bioepsis; and has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Inc., GSK, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Sandoz. SHK is an employee of Celltrion, Inc. YJB, YBJ, GEY, and JWH are employees of Celltrion, Inc., and hold stocks in Celltrion, Inc. JT, AR, JJ, AZ, AD, KK, and PAK report no disclosures., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Early treatment of individuals at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA-risk) in the preclinical phase has the potential to positively impact both patients and society by preventing disease onset and improving patients' quality of life. The PRAIRI study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the B-cell depleting agent rituximab (RTX), which resulted in a significant delay of arthritis development of up to 12 months in seropositive RA-risk individuals. Here, we report our findings on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in this study population., Methods: Seventy-eight RA-risk individuals were treated with one single dose of either placebo (PBO) or 1000 mg RTX plus 100 mg methylprednisolone (MP) and anti-histamines, regardless of treatment allocation, as co-medication. Data on quality of life were collected at baseline and 1, 4, 6, 12 and 24 months using established PRO questionnaires (visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, EuroQol five dimension (EQ-5D) and both physical and mental component score of the 36-item short-form heath survey (SF-36))., Results: No significant changes in quality of life over a 2 year follow-up were observed in at-risk individuals treated with RTX compared to PBO given the PRO scores at 24 months (mean difference±SEM: HAQ score=0.07±0.16; EQ-5D=-0.02±0.05; VAS pain=11.11±7.40). Furthermore, no significant effect of treatment on perceived arthritis severity at the time of clinically manifest disease (arthritis) was found., Conclusion: One single dose of RTX plus MP administered to RA-risk individuals does not have a meaningful and measurable positive effect on PROs after 2 years of follow-up and/or perceived disease severity at the time of arthritis development., Trial Registration Number: Trial registered at EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT Number: 2009-010955-29 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=Prevention+of+RA+by+B+cell+directed+therapy)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GF, SHMC, RBML, KIM, DMG, PPT, NdV and LGMvB report no conflict of interest. RFvV reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, as well as institutional fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BSM, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen and UCB, all outside the submitted work. SWT reports institutional grants from GSK, Lilly, Celgene, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Citryll and Galvani bioelectronics, as well as institutional fees from NovoNordisk, Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB, all outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients face different health challenges when infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) than the general population, due to both their immunocompromised state and the immunosuppressive therapies they receive. This systematic literature review, which follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) paradigm, explores the interactions between RA and SARS-CoV-2 infection, focusing on immunologic issues, disease management, vaccination, and adverse outcomes. In order to obtain the most relevant information, we systematically reviewed the specific literature from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023, based on the PRISMA method, by which we eventually selected 35 eligible articles, to which we added other ISI-indexed studies to enrich our results further. Consequently, we performed a funnel analysis to evaluate the potential for publication bias. Firstly, the data collected revealed the impact of the pandemic on RA diagnoses and the fear of face-to-face medical consultations that delayed adequate treatment. Secondly, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities increase the risk of prolonged COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalization, and severe COVID-19 outcomes for RA patients. With respect to immunosuppressive treatment used to control RA, it was observed that glucocorticoids (especially high-dose usage) and Rituximab (RTX) predispose the patients to poor SARS-CoV-2 outcomes, as opposed to Baricitinib and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. COVID-19 vaccination has proven effective and generally safe for RA patients in some studies, although therapies with Methotrexate (MTX), Abatacept (ABA), and RTX have been associated with impaired vaccine immune response. This systematic literature review brings updated and thorough information with respect to the immunological, clinical, and management of a complex immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) like RA in the setting of COVID-19 and underlines the challenges faced by this group of patients. The lessons learned can be extended beyond the pandemic in shaping a more informed and compassionate healthcare system and offering long-term medical care for patients with RA.

Background: The optimal retreatment strategy with rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a point of discussion. Depending on local guidelines, rituximab can either be administered at fixed intervals or when losing disease control, balancing therapeutic effectiveness with drug overexposure. However, treatment based on loss of disease control may significantly affect patients' lives, provoking uncertainty and potentially leading to progressive joint damage. Moreover, as low-dose rituximab proved to be effective in treating RA while decreasing toxicity, drug exposure may be limited by tapering down rituximab doses guided by disease activity., Methods: RITUXERA is a 104-week open-label multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial. In total, 134 patients with RA treated with rituximab will be 1:1 randomised when in need of retreatment (DAS28-CRP ≥ 3.2 with previous rituximab administration at least 24 weeks earlier) to either a treat-to-target-driven fixed dose retreatment strategy (usual care group) or fixed interval disease-activity guided dose optimisation strategy (experimental group). The usual care group will be retreated with fixed rituximab doses (1 × 1000 mg IV) in case of loss of disease control (DAS28-CRP ≥ 3.2). The experimental group will receive a 24-weekly rituximab treatment while tapering down the dose in a decreasing sequence if DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2: 1 × 1000 mg IV (maximal dose), 1 × 500 mg IV, and 1 × 200 mg IV (minimal dose). If DAS28-CRP exceeds 3.2 at the six-monthly retreatment, patients will receive and remain on the previous effective dose. Study visits are planned every 12 weeks. Primary outcome is the comparison of longitudinal patient-reported disease impact over 104 weeks, measured with the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) instrument, analysed using a linear mixed model. Main secondary outcome is the comparison of longitudinal disease activity (DAS28-CRP) over 104 weeks., Discussion: The RITUXERA trial aims to explore the optimal retreatment strategy with rituximab for RA in terms of long-term patient-reported disease impact, by proposing a fixed interval disease activity-guided dose optimisation strategy as compared to a treat-to-target fixed dose strategy., Trial Registration: CTIS 2023-506638-59-01 (registration date: 07 September 2023), ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06003283 (registration date: 17 August 2023)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Although treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have seen considerable advancements, there remains a lack of clear guidelines on withdrawing medications. This study aimed to investigate the current strategies for discontinuing non-systemic JIA treatment., Methods: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan., Results: According to 126 responses, the most significant factors influencing JIA treatment tapering were the duration of clinically inactive disease, medication toxicity, and a history of arthritis flares. Respondents were often cautious about discontinuing medication if symptoms, e.g. 'morning stiffness' or 'intermittent joint pain', persisted. Among subtypes, oligoarticular JIA was more amenable to treatment tapering, whereas rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA proved less amenable. Most respondents started medication tapering after a continuous clinical inactive duration exceeding 12 months, and >50% of them required >6 months to achieve treatment discontinuation. Additionally, 40% of the respondents consistently underwent imaging before treatment tapering., Conclusions: The relative risks of treatment continuation and withdrawal should be considered, and decisions should be made accordingly. To obtain improved understanding of and more robust evidence for the optimal strategies for safely discontinuing JIA treatment, it is crucial to continue investigations including long-term outcomes., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) carries a significant risk for eye complications and vision loss. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) introduced consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to standardize treatment for CAU and facilitate future comparative effectiveness studies. Two CTPs were developed to address: 1) initiation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CAU naïve to steroid-sparing therapy, and 2) initiation of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with severe uveitis or uveitis refractory to MTX. We evaluated implementation of the uveitis CTPs using existing CARRA Registry infrastructure and assessed feasibility of the CTPs for comparative effectiveness research., Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at nine pilot sites between February 2020 and August 2022. Patients with JIA-associated CAU (JIA-U) were treated according to either the MTX or TNFi CTP. Uveitis activity and medication use were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 months. We assessed patient enrollment rates, CTP arm selection, uveitis control, and quality of data collection. We also evaluated CTP arm selection in a retrospective cohort of similar JIA-U patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry during the same study period., Results: Seventeen patients were included in the pilot cohort. Eight were treated with the MTX CTP (4 oral MTX, 4 subcutaneous MTX), and 9 with the TNFi CTP (9 received standard-dose adalimumab, none selected high-dose adalimumab or infliximab). Uveitis was controlled in 13 of 17 patients by 6 months. Query of the CARRA-wide Registry identified 42 patients with JIA-U who were treated according to the MTX or TNFi CTPs. Among these, 26 were treated with MTX (8 oral, 18 subcutaneous) and 16 with TNFi (12 standard dose adalimumab, 2 high dose adalimumab, and 2 infliximab)., Conclusion: Both the MTX and TNFi uveitis CTPs can practically be implemented in clinical settings and are currently being utilized across Registry sites. However, in patients starting TNFi therapy, all pilot study participants and most patients across the CARRA Registry were treated with a standard dose of adalimumab. This consensus on the treatment approach underscores its broad acceptance but also limits the applicability of the uveitis TNFi CTP for comparative effectiveness research., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: Evaluate the efficacy and safety ® (olokizumab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice, with a targeted assessment of patient report outcomes (PRO) and central sensitization., Methods: An open-label observational non-interventional study was conducted, enrolling 183 patients with moderate and severe RA activity. All patients received OKZ 64 mg SC as injections every 4 weeks (Q4W) with methotrexate. The patients' follow-up period was 24 weeks or less. RA activity (DAS28-CRP), pain severity (NRS), patient global assessment (PGA, NRS), functional impairment (NRS), fatigue (FACIT-F), central sensitization (central sensitization inventory, CSI), and symptoms of neuropathic pain (PainDETECT) were evaluated., Results: The study cohort was comprised of 144 patients. And 39 patients were lost to follow-up, refused OKZ treatment, or were not dosed with OKZ for administrative reasons. In 6 months, DAS28-CRP decreased to 3.3 ± 0.9 (p < .001) and statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, PGA, functional impairment, and fatigue were achieved. Pain intensity decreased as early as 2 days after the first OKZ administration (p < .05). The number of patients with CSI >40 in 24 weeks decreased from 71.0% to 21.0% (p < .001), with PainDETECT >18 - from 21.5% to 13.2%. NSAIDs use decreased from 70.8% to 33.8% (р < .001), steroids - from 54.2% to 32.6%. AEs were reported in 14.2% patients, serious events were observed in three patients., Conclusion: OKZ is effective in reducing RA activity and controlling chronic pain related to dysfunction of the nociceptive system., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: The immune system of the body mistakenly targets its own joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disease that causes pain, inflammation, and damage. The complexity of RA often requires the simultaneous use of several different management strategies. This study examines the potential enhancement of conventional RA treatments, specifically conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs), by the addition of formic acid, a naturally occurring substance that may possess anti-inflammatory properties., Patients and Methods: A total of 90 children diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were examined at our hospital from 2020 to 2022. We segregated them into two cohorts, each consisting of 45 children. One cohort was administered conventional rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, referred to as cDMARDs, which specifically included methotrexate and leflunomide. The other group was administered the standard treatments in addition to a low dosage of a specialized medication known as all-trans retinoic acid. We conducted follow-up assessments on the children at 6 months and 1-year post-treatment. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments by assessing the subjective reports of the children and their physicians, analyzing the outcomes of medical examinations, and examining diagnostic images, such as X-rays. Furthermore, we took measures to ensure the safety of the treatments., Results: Among the cohort exclusively administered cDMARDs, approximately 26.7% exhibited significant improvement, 24.4% demonstrated moderate improvement, and 6.7% displayed minor improvement after a duration of 6 months. Approximately 57.8% of the children in this group experienced positive outcomes as a result of the treatment. The group that received retinoic acid also demonstrated superior outcomes. Approximately one-third (33.3%) of the participants demonstrated significant improvement, while another one-third showed moderate improvement. Additionally, 11.1% of the participants displayed minor improvement after a period of six months. Upon comparing the two groups, it was observed that the group receiving retinoic acid demonstrated a significantly superior outcome (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Overall, the incorporation of all-trans retinoic acid alongside conventional treatments for children with RA appears to enhance their efficacy.

Abstract: Methotrexate is one of the most frequently used medications for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Although initially developed for use as chemotherapy for both solid and hematologic malignancies, it was used as early as the 1960s with success for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis, ultimately being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of RA in 1988. Beyond RA and psoriatic arthritis, methotrexate is used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and other inflammatory conditions. Methotrexate is cytotoxic to the trophoblast and has been used to treat both ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, leading to studies in the early 1990s that showed it was effective and safe for early abortion in combination with prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol. Methotrexate is also a teratogen, causing serious birth defects in 6%-10% of patients taking it while pregnant. Additionally, women are more likely to be affected by both RA at SLE, as compared with males, thus worsening the burden of these adverse effects. Both methotrexate's history of use as an abortifacient and its teratogenic properties make its use more complicated in the current era of abortion policy in the United States following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling. Recently published data suggest that this ruling has affected both provider perspectives and patient experiences as it relates to methotrexate use. In the post-Dobbs era, the role of the rheumatologist as it relates to patients' sexual and reproductive health is likely to expand., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) often affect women during their reproductive years, and early studies of pregnancy in these patients reported high rates of adverse outcomes. Continuation or initiation of safe and effective medications in the preconception period is beneficial for maintaining or achieving disease quiescence throughout pregnancy thereby improving both maternal and pregnancy outcomes. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, the American College of Rheumatology, and the British Society for Rheumatology have published recommendations and guidelines regarding management of ARDs during pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Gastroenterological Association have also provided guidance statements with relevant recommendations. This review provides an overview of available recommendations for medication use in ARD pregnancy, with discussion of safety considerations for maternal and fetal well-being. Medications considered compatible with pregnancy include hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and TNF inhibitors. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, leflunomide, and cyclophosphamide should be avoided before and during pregnancy. Other medications, most of them newer, are largely discouraged for use in pregnancy due to inadequate data or concerns for neonatal immunosuppression, including non-TNF biologics and small molecule therapies. Further investigation is needed regarding effects of non-TNF biologics, biosimilars, and small molecules in pregnancy. Important efforts for the future will include improved methodologies to gather critical safety data, with consideration of inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, a complex and controversial issue. Long-term information on outcomes in offspring of treated women is lacking for many of these medications., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Protracted febrile myalgia syndrome (PFMS) is characterized by severe myalgia, fever, abdominal pain, and arthralgia/arthritis episodes lasting for several weeks in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Treatment options include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and anti-interleukin-1 therapy. This study aimed to share our experiences of PFMS so as to shed light on this rare and elusive condition., Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included 17 patients diagnosed with PFMS at our pediatric rheumatology clinic between January 2018 and September 2023., Results: In our clinic, 17 (1%) of 1663 familial Mediterranean fever patients presented with PFMS, and it was the initial manifestation in 10 patients (58.8%) in the cohort. Eight of the 17 patients had an M694V homozygous mutation in the MEFV gene. A magnetic resonance imaging showed myositis and fasciitis in just 1 patient, and myositis alone was evident in 5 others. Symptoms improved in 2 patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, whereas prednisolone improved symptoms in 12 patients and anakinra was required in 3 patients. Patients who received anakinra had another severe attack and required long-term anakinra or canakinumab., Conclusions: Syndrome for PFMS is difficult to recognize as it can sometimes be the first manifestation of familial Mediterranean fever. The syndrome is not accompanied by fever in some patients, even though the word febrile is part of its name. Most patients respond dramatically to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. In some patients with PFMS, long-term anakinra or canakinumab treatment may be more useful in preventing severe attacks of PFMS than short-term (5 to 7 days) anakinra treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease, and colchicine is the mainstay of treatment. Approximately 5%-10% of patients may respond inadequately to colchicine, and anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) agents are important treatment options in these patients. The aim of this study was to see whether there is any factor associated with the withdrawal of these anti-IL-1 agents and to investigate the characteristics of colchicine-resistant FMF patients who needed biological therapy., Methods: Demographic, clinical characteristics, and disease severity of patients, at 2 referral centers, between 2012 and 2022, in whom anti-IL-1 treatment was continued and discontinued, were compared in this study. The international severity scoring system for FMF (ISSF) was used for disease severity assessment., Results: In 64 colchicine-resistant FMF patients, the median (interquartile range) duration of biological treatment was 39 (45) months. Treatment of 26 patients (40.6%) was started with anakinra and 38 (59.4%) with canakinumab. During follow-up, anti-IL-1 treatment was discontinued in 23 patients (35.9%). High ISSF scores before biological treatment, presence of exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities were found to be statistically more frequent in the group whose biological therapy could not be discontinued ( p = 0.009, p = 0.006, p = 0.026, p = 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: Low ISSF scores before biological treatment with no accompanying exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities may be stated as an associated factors in terms of the discontinuation of biological agents in colchicine-resistant pediatric FMF patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hydroxychloroquine is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug commonly used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Although rare, hydroxychloroquine is associated with hypoglycemia in patients with or without diabetes due to its ability to alter insulin metabolism. There have been several cases described in the literature, but none of which, to our knowledge, detail follow-up and time to resolution of hypoglycemia. We describe a 55-year-old female who presents for episodes of hypoglycemia. She reported hypoglycemic symptoms and fasting blood glucoses in the 60-70s mg/dL regularly. Based on the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale, hydroxychloroquine was the probable etiology of her hypoglycemic episodes due to the improvement at her 3-month follow up appointment after discontinuing the drug. Providers should be mindful of the hypoglycemia risk when using hydroxychloroquine and be aware that the effects may take an extended amount of time to resolve given the drug's long half-life., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of Rituximab (RTX) in patients with refractory Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) from a monocentric cohort. Thereafter, we evaluated the efficacy of a low-dose RTX regimen as a remission-maintenance therapy., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of patients affected with IIM treated with RTX. All patients were refractory to glucocorticoids (GC) and at least one immunosuppressant. Two infusions of 1 g two weeks apart were considered as standard cycle of RTX, a single dose of 1 g every six months was deemed as a low-dose RTX regimen. Complete and partial response were defined according to physician's judgment, laboratory and radiological features., Results: Thirty-six patients affected with IIM were enrolled. Eighteen patients (50%) required the use of RTX for muscular involvement, 6 (16.7%) for interstitial lung disease (ILD), 12 (33.3%) for both myositis and ILD. We observed complete response to RTX in 25 patients (69.4%), partial response in 7 (19.4%) and no response in 4 (11.1%), with an overall response of 88.8% (partial and complete response). From the subgroup of twenty-five patients that achieved a complete response, six were treated with a low dose maintenance therapy maintaining a complete response to RTX. Twenty-six patients who achieved a complete or partial response were able to decrease the mean daily GC dose. Infections were the major adverse events detected in our study., Conclusions: RTX shows favorable outcomes in refractory patients with IIM. A low-dose regimen of RTX appears to be effective in maintaining remission after induction with standard dose. Key Points • The precise pathogenic mechanism of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) remains elusive; however, a growing body of data support the autoimmune hypothesis. In this context, rituximab, a B cell-depleting agent, has emerged as a second-line therapeutic option in IIM. • Several studies have assessed It its effectiveness in refractory IIM patients. • Limited information exists on the use of Rituximab as maintenance therapy in patients who have achieved remission following induction therapy with Rituximab., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX, csDMARDs or bDMARDs., Methods: Data from three completed phase III studies-RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR) and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR)-and one completed long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) were analysed up to 6.5 years [340 weeks (RA-BEAM) and 336 weeks (RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON)]. Low disease activity (LDA) [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11], clinical remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and physical function [Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤0.5] were the main outcomes assessed. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population., Results: At week 340 or 336, LDA was achieved in 37%/83% of MTX-IR, 35%/83% of csDMARD-IR and 23%/73% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Remission was achieved in 20%/40% of MTX-IR, 13%/32% of csDMARD-IR and 9%/30% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. HAQ-DI ≤0.5 was reached in 31%/51% of MTX-IR, 25%/46% of csDMARD-IR and 24%/38% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively., Conclusion: Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg demonstrated efficacy up to 6.5 years with maintained LDA/remission results across SDAI, CDAI and DAS28-hsCRP consistent with previously reported data, and was well tolerated., Trial Registration: United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov; RA-BEYOND; NCT01885078., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

. Previously, 24-week results of phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical study (SOLAR) of levilimab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) proved a superiority of levilimab over placebo. Here, we present 1-year efficacy and safety data of the SOLAR study., Objectives: . To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with MTX resistant active RA., Materials and Methods: : The study was conducted at 21 clinical sites in Russia and Belarus. All randomized subjects have completed the study between November 2019 and October 2021. Adult subjects (154) aged ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of RA 1 were randomly assigned (2 : 1) to receive either levilimab (162 mg, SC, QW) + MTX (n = 102) or placebo + MTX (n = 52). After W24 of the study all subjects continued to  receive open label levilimab. Subjects who have achieved DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24 were switched to maintenance (Q2W) regimen of levilimab at W28 (LVL QW/Q2W and PBO/LVL Q2W arms). Those with DAS28-CRP > 2.6 at W28 continued with QW regimen (LVL QW and PBO/LVL QW arm). The PBO/LVL Q2W arm contained only one subject, thus not included in the analysis. The efficacy analysis was performed in a population of all randomized subjects. Those with missing data due to study discontinuation or rescue therapy prescription were considered non-responders. Otherwise, the analysis was performed on complete cases. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) in a population of those, who received at least on dose of LVL (n = 152)., Results: : Better response to treatment was observed in LVL QW/Q2W as it composed of those who reach DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24. At this time point 15/27 (55.6%) of them achieved ACR70; 23/27 (85.2%) achieved DAS28-CRP remission (<2.6) and 7/27 (25.9%) achieved ACR/EULAR2011 remission of RA. After switching to LVL Q2W, rates of ACR70 and DAS28-CRP<2.6 did not significantly changed until W52: 17/27 (63.0%) and 21/27 (77.8%), respectively, yet the proportion of subject with ACR/EULAR 2011 remission further increased and reached 12/27 (44.4%). LVL QW arm was diminished by subjects who achieved high response to treatment at W24 and composed LVL QW/Q2W arm. Thus, ACR70, and remissions rate in this arm was close to zero at W24. However, continuation of LVL QW in those who not achieved DAS28-CRP ≤ 2.6 at W24 induced ACR70 response in 37/75 (36.0%), DAS28-CRP remission in 35/75 (46.7%) and ACR/EULAR 2011 remission in 8/75 (10.7%) at W52. The most common adverse events (reported in ≥5% of subjects) were blood cholesterol increase (30.3%), ALT increase (23.0%), lymphocyte count decrease (17.1%), ANC decrease (16.4%), blood triglycerides increase (13.8%), bilirubin increase (11.2%), AST increase (9.9%), WBC decrease (9.9%), IGRA with Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen positive (7.2%), and injection site reactions (5.9%). No deaths occurred., Conclusions: : Open label period confirmed the lasting efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with MTX in subjects with MTX resistant active RA and suggested the possibility of switching to levilimab maintenance regimen (once every 2 weeks) (Q2W) in those who achieved remission of RA at week 24., (© 2024. Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.)

Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF- α) antagonists are considered a significant therapeutic option in the treatment of sarcoidosis. Nevertheless, their use can also paradoxically result in sarcoidosis-like reactions. Here, we present a case of a 56-year-old patient with psoriatic arthritis who after 3 months of certolizumab therapy developed pulmonary sarcoidosis. Therefore, certolizumab was discontinued and prednisone initiated. Subsequently, 4 months later a complete remission of interstitial lesions was observed. Due to insufficient control of psoriatic arthritis, upadacitinib and methotrexate were prescribed and despite initial improvement, a couple of months later a massive exacerbation of skin psoriasis occurred and the treatment was switched to secukinumab. As of today, no evidence of sarcoidosis recurrence has been noted. Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reactions (DISR) appear to be less frequently associated with certolizumab rather than with other anti-TNF-α agents. However, specific mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear and require future investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: We sought to determine the impact of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose on the risk of hospitalizations for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: We conducted a case-crossover study within an academic health system, including patients with SLE who used HCQ and had ≥1 hospitalization for active SLE between January 2011 and December 2021. Case periods ended in hospitalization for SLE, whereas control periods did not. The exposures were the average weight-based HCQ dose, categorized as ≤5 or >5 mg/kg/day, and non-weight-based HCQ dose, categorized as <400 or 400 mg/day, assessed during each six-month case or control period. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for prior disease activity, kidney function, glucocorticoid use, and other immunosuppressant use., Results: Of 2,974 patients with SLE who used HCQ (mean age 36.5 years; 92% female), 584 had ≥1 hospitalization with primary discharge diagnosis of SLE. Of these, 122 had ≥1 hospitalization for active SLE while using HCQ and had ≥1 control period with HCQ use during the study period. Lower HCQ weight-based dose (≤5 vs >5 mg/kg/day) and non-weight-based dose (<400 vs 400 mg/day) were each associated with increased hospitalizations for active SLE (adjusted OR 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-12.19, and adjusted OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.31-8.81)., Conclusion: The use of lower doses of HCQ was associated with an increased risk of hospitalizations for active SLE. Although the long-term risk of HCQ retinopathy must be acknowledged, this must be balanced with the short-term and cumulative risks of increased SLE activity., (© 2024 American College of Rheumatology.)

To evaluate tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) drug-levels and presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) in patients with inflammatory arthritis who taper TNFi compared to TNFi continuation. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis on stable TNFi dose and in low disease activity ≥ 12 months were randomised (2:1) to disease activity-guided tapering or control. Blood samples at baseline, 12- and 18-months were evaluated for TNFi drug-levels and ADAb. In total, 129 patients were randomised to tapering (n = 88) or control (n = 41). Between baseline and month 18, a significant shift in TNFi drug-levels were observed in the tapering group resulting in fewer patients with high drug-levels (change: - 14% [95% CI - 27 to - 1%]) and more with low drug-levels (change: 18% [95% CI 5-31%]). Disease activity was equivalent between groups at 18 months, mean difference: RA - 0.06 (95% CI - 0.44 to 0.33), PsA 0.03 (95% CI - 0.36 to 0.42), and axSpA 0.16 (- 0.17 to 0.49), equivalence margins ± 0.5 disease activity points. ADAb were detected in eight patients, all from the tapering group. TNFi drug-level category or ADAb were not predictive for achieving successful tapering at 18 months. TNFi drug-levels decreased during tapering which indicate adherence to the tapering algorithm. Despite the difference in TNFi drug-levels at 18 months, disease activity remained equivalent, and only few tapering patients had detectable ADAb. These data do not support using TNFi drug-level and/or ADAb to guide the tapering decision but future research with larger trials is needed.Trial registration: EudraCT: 2017-001970-41, December 21, 2017., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist used as an immunosuppressant in a number of conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Low-dose MTX (MTX-LD) is associated with a risk of haematological, hepatic, gastrointestinal and pulmonary toxicity, which may up until now have limited its use., State of the Art: In RA, data from retrospective cohorts have reported a possible excess risk of methotrexate toxicity in cases of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent prospective and retrospective multicentre studies have found no such increased risk, and have reassuringly concluded that MTX-LD can be prescribed in cases of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD)., Perspectives and Conclusions: Current recommendations are not to delay the introduction of MTX in patients with RA at risk of developing ILD or in the presence of RA-ILD with mild to moderate respiratory impairment., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a debilitating disease mainly treated by DMARDs. Baricitinib is one of the emerging DMARDs with strong anti-rheumatic effects but has serious side effects. Trivalent chromium (Cr III) is a natural element with anti-inflammatory properties. Trivalent chromium (Cr III) is introduced for the first time to study its effect and safety in treatment of RA patients and compared to those of baricitinib., Methods: This is a phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial where RA patients were divided in a ratio of 2:1 according to the newly introduced medication either Cr (III) (group A) or baricitinib (group B). Patients attended three visits on day 0, after 3 weeks and 12 weeks, disease activity was scored. Hands ultrasound was done and reassessed. Side effects were monitored throughout the study., Results: DAS28-CRP improved by 26.9% and 11.8% on third visit for Cr III and baricitinib, respectively (p = 0.001). DAS28-ESR improved by 25.6% and 7.74% on third visit for Cr III and baricitinib, respectively (p =  < 0.001). ACR 50 was 18.8% for Cr III and 5.7% for baricitinib on second visit. ACR 70 was 25% for Cr III and 0% for baricitinib on third visit (P =  < 0.001). Ultrasound GLOESS, SH, PDUS, joints effusions improved by 38.9%, 38.4%, 56.7% and 74.8% for Cr III, while by 10.5%, 3.75%, 59.6% and worsening of joints effusions happened with baricitinib on third visit. p = 0.022 and 0.002 between groups for GLOESS and SH improvement, respectively., Conclusions: Cr III has shown very promising fast clinical and sonographic results in treating RA patients which were surprisingly superior to baricitinib in most aspects. Furthermore, Cr III is potentially safe with evidently fewer side effects than baricitinib and other DMARDs, however, long-term safety is still not established. (IRB No.: 00012098- FWA No.: 00018699, Serial number: 040457) ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05545020., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ABA in RA-ILD patients according to the route of administration., Methods: National retrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD patients on treatment with ABA. They were divided into 2 groups: a) IV, and b) SC. The following outcomes were analysed from baseline to final follow-up using linear mixed models: a) forced vital capacity (FVC), b) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), c) chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), d) dyspnoea, e) RA activity, and f) sparing corticosteroids effect., Results: A total of 397 patients were included (94 IV-ABA and 303 SC-ABA), median follow-up of 24 [10-48] months. After adjustment for possible confounders, FVC and DLCO remained stable during the first 24 months without differences between IV-ABA and SC-ABA (p = 0.6304 and 0.5337). Improvement/ stability of lung lesions in HRCT was observed in 67 % of patients (75 % IV-ABA, 64 % SC-ABA; p = 0.07). Dyspnoea stabilized/ improved in 84 % of patients (90 % IV-ABA, 82 % SC-ABA; p = 0.09). RA - disease activity improved in both groups. No statistically significant differences regarding any of the variables studied between the two groups were found. ABA was withdrawn in 87 patients (21.9 %), 45 % IV-ABA and 37 % SC-ABA (p = 0.29). ILD worsening and articular inefficacy were the most common reasons for ABA discontinuation., Conclusion: In patients with RA-ILD, ABA seems to be equally effective regardless of the route of administration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Disclosures that may be interpreted as constituting of possible conflict(s) of interest for the study: B. A.-M. received grants/research supports from Abbvie and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Pfizer, Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB and Lilly, outside the submitted work; N.V.-R. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau and research supports from AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, Nordic Pharma, MSD and Rubió; L.C.D.-C has received research supports and participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly and Celgene; J.L.M has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Galapagos and had consultation fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; G.B has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); A.U.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Galápagos, Novartis, GSK, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Pfizer and Amgen; C.F.-D. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from: Janssen, Galápagos, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); I. F.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbott, MSD, Janssen, and Roche, as well as consultation fees from company sponsored speakers bureaus associated with Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Celgene, and MSD; S.C. has received research supports from MSD and Pfizer and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Amgen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Roche, and UCB. S. C. is also assistant professor of the cátedra EPID-Future, funded by UAM-Roche, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain; R. B. received grants/research support from AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in a company-sponsored speaker's bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD. The rest of the authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those undergoing haemodialysis (HD)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 425 patients with RA prescribed their first bDMARDs at two hospitals from 2004 to 2021. Patients were categorised by kidney function and bDMARD modality (TNFα inhibitors (TNFαis), interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6is), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig)). The primary outcome was the 36-month drug retention rate, with secondary outcomes including changes in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), prednisolone dosage and reasons for discontinuation., Results: The 36-month drug retention rates by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≥60, 30-60, <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were as follows: all bDMARDs (45.2%, 32.0%, 41.4%), TNFαis (45.3%, 28.2%, 34.0%), IL-6is (47.4%, 66.7%, 71.4%) and CTLA-4Ig (50.0%, 31.3%, 33.3%). Even in groups with lower kidney function, the drug retention rate of bDMARDs was generally maintained. However, the retention rate of TNFαis was significantly lower in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . IL-6is showed the highest retention rate and the lowest discontinuation rate due to ineffectiveness in this group (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.85, p=0.03). All bDMARDs improved DAS28-CRP/ESR and reduced prednisolone dosage across all groups., Conclusion: bDMARDs demonstrated effective and safe profiles in patients with RA with CKD, even among patients on HD. In particular, IL-6is had a significantly higher drug retention rate in patients with an eGFR of <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and fewer discontinuations due to ineffectiveness. IL-6is were more efficacious as monotherapy compared with the other bDMARDs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objectives: To assess impact of bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using 16-week data from two phase 3 studies., Methods: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; tumour necrosis factor inhibitor inadequate response/intolerance (TNFi-IR)) are phase 3 studies of subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W; both were double-blind and placebo-controlled to 16 weeks. Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to bimekizumab, placebo or reference (subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg Q2W) in BE OPTIMAL; 2:1 to bimekizumab or placebo in BE COMPLETE. Patient-reported outcomes for pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL are reported to week 16 using pooled and individual study data for bimekizumab and placebo patients., Results: 1073/1112 (96.5%) patients completed week 16 (bimekizumab:‍ 677/698 [97.0%]; placebo: 396/414 [95.7%]). Bimekizumab-treated patients achieved rapid improvements vs placebo in pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL by week 4, after a single dose. Improvements continued to week 16 for all patient-reported outcomes, including Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; mean (95% CI) change from baseline: bimekizumab: -‍25.2 [-27.2, -23.1]; placebo:‍ -‍5.7 [-8.2, -3.3]) and FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 4.5 [3.9, 5.1]; placebo: 1.1 [0.3, 2.0]); both nominal p<0.001. Greater proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported symptoms vs placebo, including FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 53.1%; placebo: 36.3%) and HAQ-DI (bimekizumab:‍ 53.0%; placebo: 28.7%); both nominal p<0.001., Conclusion: Bimekizumab treatment demonstrated rapid and greater improvements in patient-reported pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL to week 16 vs placebo in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03895203; NCT03896581., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MEH: Advisory board member and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. PJM: Research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Acelyrin, Aclaris, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Moonlake Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and UCB; speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. JFM: Affiliated with Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA at time of analysis; currently affiliated with UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; consultant and/or investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma and UCB. WT: Research grants, consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Ovo Pharma, Pfizer and UCB. NG, JC, JL: Employees and shareholders of UCB. BI: Employee of UCB; shareholder of AbbVie, GSK and UCB. VT: Employee of UCB. DDG: Consultant and/or received grant support from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Equivalent efficacy and comparable pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 and reference tocilizumab (TCZ) in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported up to week 24 (treatment period [TP] 1) of the phase 3 study. Here we present results for TP2 (study weeks 24-48)., Methods: In this phase 3, multicenter, multiregional, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study, participants with active RA despite methotrexate were randomized (1:1:2) to intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks to week 48 (TCZ group), or TCZ to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800 group), or BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (BAT1806/BIIB800 group). Efficacy in TP2 was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and change from baseline in Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28). Pharmacokinetics (trough levels), safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated., Results: Of 621 randomized participants, 577 (92.9%) completed TP1 and entered TP2 (TCZ: N = 145 [93.5%]; TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 142 [92.2%]; BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 290 [92.9%]). Proportions of ACR20 responders were similar between treatment groups throughout TP2 (87.8%, 90.3%, and 90.4%, respectively, at week 48), as were proportions of ACR50 and ACR70 responders, and reduction in DAS28. Drug trough levels and antidrug antibody incidences were comparable between the treatment groups. Adverse events were balanced across the treatment groups and no fatal events were reported., Conclusion: In TP2, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between the TCZ, TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800, and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups., Trial Registration: NCT03830203 and EudraCT 2018-002202-31., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) vs. MTX monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Sixty patients without prior RA treatments were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: one receiving MTX plus HCQ, and the other receiving MTX monotherapy. We conducted a comparative analysis before and after the 12-week trial, evaluating the visual analogue scale (VAS), the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS), serum inflammatory factor (including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as well as the outcome of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for all the participants in the study., Results: At the 12th week of the trial, a more remarkable decrease in pain score (VAS), disease activity score (DAS), and serum inflammatory factor levels could be noticed in individuals on the combination therapy. The quality of life score was as well found to be higher in the MTX + HCQ group than the MTX monotherapy group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the MTX + HCQ and the MTX monotherapy groups were 10.00% and 6.67%, respectively. However, no statistical significance could be observed (p > .05)., Conclusion: In our study, both the MTX + HCQ combination therapy and MTX monotherapy demonstrated improvements in symptoms, conditions and quality of life for patients with RA. Notably, the combination therapy could achieve better outcomes across all indices compared to MTX monotherapy, highlighting its potential as the optimal first-line treatment for RA. © 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, joint swelling, and pain involving multiple joints. While biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are popular treatments for RA, there is limited research on their combined use. This study examined a cohort of RA patients who demonstrated inadequate response to bDMARDs and subsequently initiated combination therapy with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, assessing both the efficacy and safety profile of this therapeutic approach., Methods: In this study, we retrospectively collected the electronic medical records (EMR) of 62 adult patients with RA who were admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine between August 2018 and December 2022. All patients had received at least one bDMARD treatment for more than 3 months and still exhibited moderate-to-high disease activity. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid was added to their original biological treatment in 28 cases, and other 34 cases switched to another bDMARD or tsDMARD as control group. Treatment was continued for 24 weeks following the initiation of combination therapy. Changes in DAS28-ESR and ACR20, 50, 70 response rates at week 24 were collected and analyzed from baseline, while changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 were also collected and analyzed., Results: After 24 weeks of treatment, the DAS28-ESR score in combined treatment group decreased significantly from a baseline of 5.26 ± 0.90 (3.87-8.31) to 2.67 ± 0.86 (1.41-5.11), with remission achieved by 19 patients (67.9%) and low disease activity achieved by five patients (17.9%). The DAS28-ESR in the control group exhibited a decrease from 5.20 ± 0.77 (3.87-7.23) at baseline to 3.25 ± 1.29 (1.54-5.69). In all, 13 patients (38.2%) achieved remission, while another 11 patients (32.4%) achieved low disease activity. The ACR20, 50, 70 response rates were 85.71%, 75%, and 39.29% in the combined treatment group, whereas it were 75.0%, 53.57%, 21.43% in the control group. Additionally, both ESR and CRP levels decreased significantly during the course of treatment without any reported adverse events leading to discontinuation., Conclusion: Our findings offer some evidence, supporting the effectiveness and safety of combining bDMARD with JAKi tofacitinib in RA patients who have an inadequate response to bDMARD monotherapy. This combination effectively manages disease activity while maintaining a relatively low and manageable incidence of adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are anticipated to provide evidence-based medical support., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are limited. Previous small studies suggest that the antirheumatic drug methotrexate may be a potential treatment for OA pain., Objective: To assess symptomatic benefits of methotrexate in knee OA (KOA)., Design: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done between 13 June 2014 and 13 October 2017. (ISRCTN77854383; EudraCT: 2013-001689-41)., Setting: 15 secondary care musculoskeletal clinics in the United Kingdom., Participants: A total of 207 participants with symptomatic, radiographic KOA and knee pain (severity ≥4 out of 10) on most days in the past 3 months with inadequate response to current medication were approached for inclusion., Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral methotrexate once weekly (6-week escalation 10 to 25 mg) or matched placebo over 12 months and continued usual analgesia., Measurements: The primary end point was average knee pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] 0 to 10) at 6 months, with 12-month follow-up to assess longer-term response. Secondary end points included knee stiffness and function outcomes and adverse events (AEs)., Results: A total of 155 participants (64% women; mean age, 60.9 years; 50% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4) were randomly assigned to methotrexate ( n  = 77) or placebo ( n  = 78). Follow-up was 86% ( n  = 134; methotrexate: 66, placebo: 68) at 6 months. Mean knee pain decreased from 6.4 (SD, 1.80) at baseline to 5.1 (SD, 2.32) at 6 months in the methotrexate group and from 6.8 (SD, 1.62) to 6.2 (SD, 2.30) in the placebo group. The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant pain reduction of 0.79 NRS points in favor of methotrexate (95% CI, 0.08 to 1.51; P  = 0.030). There were also statistically significant treatment group differences in favor of methotrexate at 6 months for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (0.60 points [CI, 0.01 to 1.18]; P  = 0.045) and function (5.01 points [CI, 1.29 to 8.74]; P  = 0.008). Treatment adherence analysis supported a dose-response effect. Four unrelated serious AEs were reported (methotrexate: 2, placebo: 2)., Limitation: Not permitting oral methotrexate to be changed to subcutaneous delivery for intolerance., Conclusion: Oral methotrexate added to usual medications demonstrated statistically significant reduction in KOA pain, stiffness, and function at 6 months., Primary Funding Source: Versus Arthritis., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M24-0303.

Objective: To analyze the long-term survival of subcutaneous biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitors compared to the originator molecules in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as the factors associated with drug discontinuation., Methods: Retrospective analysis of BIOBADASER, the Spanish multicenter prospective registry of patients with rheumatic disease receiving biologic and targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients who started etanercept (ETN) or adalimumab (ADA) from January 2016 to October 2023 were included. The survival probabilities of biosimilars and originators were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimating curves. To identify factors associated with differences in the retention rates, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression models for all and specific causes (inefficacy or adverse events [AEs]) of discontinuation., Results: A total of 4162 patients received 4723 treatment courses (2991 courses of ADA and 1732 courses of ETN), of which 722 (15.29%) were with originator molecules and 4001 (84.71%) were with biosimilars. The originators were more frequently discontinued than biosimilars (53.32% vs 33.37%, respectively). The main reason for discontinuation was inefficacy (60.35% of the treatments). The risk of overall discontinuation was lower for biosimilars (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). Female sex, obesity, and second or later treatment lines increased the risk of discontinuation, whereas disease duration and the use of concomitant methotrexate were associated with a greater survival. When assessing cause-specific reasons of discontinuation, excluding nonmedical switching, the results from the crude and adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in the retention rate between biosimilars and originators., Conclusion: No significant differences were found between treatments in long-term survival due to inefficacy or AEs., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)