Search

Tamoxifen exposure is a recognised risk for primary endometrial cancer. This case serves as a reminder to meticulously check the past medical history and inform patients of the risk-benefit of treatment as part of a shared-decision making process.

Purpose: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer, and a prerequisite for the use of endocrine therapy. In ER+ early breast cancer, however, no receptor-associated biomarker exists that identifies patients with a particularly favorable outcome. We have investigated the value of ESR1 amplification in predicting the long-term clinical outcome in tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Experimental Design: 394 patients who had been randomized into the tamoxifen-only arm of the prospective randomized ABCSG-06 trial of adjuvant endocrine therapy with available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue were included in this analysis. IHC ERα expression was evaluated both locally and in a central lab using the Allred score, while ESR1 gene amplification was evaluated by FISH analysis using the ESR1/CEP6 ratio indicating focal copy number alterations. Results: Focal ESR1 copy-number elevations (amplifications) were detected in 187 of 394 (47%) tumor specimens, and were associated with a favorable outcome: After a median follow-up of 10 years, women with intratumoral focal ESR1 amplification had a significantly longer distant recurrence-free survival [adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.91; P = 0.02] and breast cancer–specific survival (adjusted HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27–0.80; P = 0.01) as compared with women without ESR1 amplification. IHC ERα protein expression, evaluated by Allred score, correlated significantly with focal ESR1 amplification (P < 0.0001; χ2 test), but was not prognostic by itself. Conclusions: Focal ESR1 amplification is an independent and powerful predictor for long-term distant recurrence-free and breast cancer–specific survival in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early-stage breast cancer who received tamoxifen for 5 years.

Endocrine therapies are the main treatment strategies for the clinical management of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Despite prolonged time to recurrence in the adjuvant setting and the initial clinical responses in the metastatic setting, many patients eventually encounter tumour relapse due to acquired resistance to these agents. Other patients experience a lack of tumour regression at the beginning of treatment indicating de novo resistance that significantly limits its efficacy in the clinic. There is compelling evidence that human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression contributes to resistance to endocrine therapies in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. ER+/HER2+ tumours comprise about 10% of all breast cancer cases and about 60% of the whole set of HER2+ tumours. Most patients with primary ER+/HER2+ disease will receive antibody-based HER2-targeted therapy, but this is generally for no more than one year while endocrine treatment is usually for at least 5 years. A number of HER2-kinase inhibitors are also now in clinical use or in clinical trials, and the interaction of these with endocrine treatment may differ from that of antibody treatment. In this review article, we aim to summarise knowledge on molecular mechanisms of breast cancer resistance to endocrine therapies attributable to the impact of HER2 signalling on endocrine sensitivity, to discuss data from clinical trials addressing the role of HER2 in the development of endocrine resistance in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and to explore rational new therapeutic strategies.

Background:\ud Hormone Therapy (HT) is recommended for most women with HR-positive primary breast cancer. When taken as intended, HT reduces breast cancer recurrence by 40% and mortality by one-third. The recommended duration of treatment ranges from 5 to 10 years depending on risk of recurrence and the specific HT regimen. However, recent data indicates that rates of HT non-adherence are high and research suggests this may be due to the impact of HT side effects. The contribution of side effects to non-adherence and non-persistence behaviours has rarely been systematically explored, thereby hindering the implementation of targeted intervention strategies. Our aim is to identify, evaluate and summarise the relationship between HT side effects and patterns of adherence and persistence.\ud \ud Methods:\ud Electronic searches were conducted from inception and were completed by September 2021, utilising Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. Searches included a combination of terms related to breast cancer, adherence, hormone therapy and side effects.\ud \ud Results:\ud Sixty-two eligible papers were identified and study quality varied by study type. Most observational and cross-sectional studies were rated good quality, whereas most controlled intervention studies were rated fair quality. Three studies were rated poor quality. The most frequently measured side effects were pain, low mood, hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety, fatigue, weight gain, concentration/memory problems.\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud This review identified a lack of consistency in the measurement of adherence and the definition of persistence across studies. The instruments used to measure side effects also varied significantly. This variation and lack of consistency makes it difficult to evaluate and summarise the role of HT side effects in HT adherence and persistence behaviour.

Background: Approximately 75% of breast cancer (BC) is associated with luminal differentiation expressing endocrine receptors (ER). For ER+ HER2− tumors, adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone treatment. Although relapse events steadily continue, the ET benefits translate to dramatically lengthen life expectancy with bearable side-effects. This review of ER+ HER2− female BC outlines suitable adjuvant treatment strategies to help guide clinical decision making around appropriate therapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Libraries, using ER+ HER−, ET BC keywords. Results: In low-risk patients: five years of ET is the standard option. While Tamoxifen remains the preferred selection for premenopausal women, AI is the choice for postmenopausal patients. In the high-risk category: ET plus/minus OFS with two years of Abemaciclib is recommended. Although extended ET for a total of ten years is an alternative, the optimal AI duration is undetermined; nevertheless an additional two to three years beyond the initial five years may be sufficient. In this postmenopausal group, bisphosphonate is endorsed. Conclusions: Classifying the risk category assists in deciding the treatment route and its optimal duration. Tailoring the breadth of ET hinges on a wide array of factors to be appraised for each individualized case, including weighing its benefits and harms.

Breast cancer (BC) remains the most common cancer among women worldwide. Hormone receptor-positive (estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive) BC represents 70% of all cases. Advances in the treatment of disease lead to improved patient survival. As a result, quality-of-life (QoL) becomes a major concern in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the impact of socio-demographic, clinical and treatment-related factors on QoL among patients with BC treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. We used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast questionnaire to evaluate QoL. In the entire cohort, multivariate analysis determined age and switching treatment from tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors to be significant positive coefficients of QoL, while comorbidity tended to be associated with lower scores. Education level and chemotherapy were significant determinants of QoL in the tamoxifen group, while comorbidity, surgery type, radiotherapy and disease stage had a significant impact on QoL in the aromatase inhibitor group. These findings can be utilized to identify certain subgroups that may need greater supportive care.

Purpose Guidelines recommend endocrine treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers for up to 10 years. Earlier data suggest that the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint) has potential to select patients that have an excellent survival without chemotherapy and limited or no tamoxifen treatment. The aim was to validate the 70-gene signature ultralow-risk classification for endocrine therapy decision making. Methods In the IKA trial, postmenopausal patients with non-metastatic breast cancer had been randomized between no or limited adjuvant tamoxifen treatment without receiving chemotherapy. For this secondary analysis, FFPE tumor material was obtained of ER+HER2− patients with 0–3 positive lymph nodes and tested for the 70-gene signature. Distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) long-term follow-up data were collected. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate DRFI, stratified by lymph node status, for the three predefined 70-gene signature risk groups. Results A reliable 70-gene signature could be obtained for 135 patients. Of the node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively, 20% and 13% had an ultralow-risk classification. No DRFI events were observed for node-negative patients with an ultralow-risk score in the first 10 years. The 10-year DRFI was 90% and 66% in the low-risk (but not ultralow) and high-risk classified node-negative patients, respectively. Conclusion These survival analyses indicate that the postmenopausal node-negative ER+HER2− patients with an ultralow-risk 70-gene signature score have an excellent 10-year DRFI after surgery with a median of 1 year of endocrine treatment. This is in line with published results of the STO-3-randomized clinical trial and supports the concept that it is possible to reduce the duration of endocrine treatment in selected patients.

Uterine leiomyoma is the most common benign tumour of the female reproductive tract originating from the uterine smooth muscle causing morbidity and impairing their quality of life. It is common among women in the age group 30 to 50 years of age. Women are usually asymptomatic or may present with various symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and change in bowel and bladder habits due to pressure symptoms. It is one of the leading causes of hysterectomy. Women with uterine leiomyoma can be managed medically and surgically. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue is one of the modalities used preoperatively to reduce the size of large uterine fibroid. We present the case report of a 36-year-old nulligravida who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy for large uterine leiomyoma weighing 5.61 kg without compression symptoms. She received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (injection leuprolide) preoperatively for reduction of the size of uterine myoma.case reports; gonadotropin-releasing hormone; hysterectomy; leiomyoma.

Purpose Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy within the first 2 years after initiation, and to study the association between early discontinuation and functional status and quality of life (QoL). Methods Patients aged ≥ 70 years with stage I–III breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary endpoint was discontinuation of endocrine therapy within 2 years. Risk factors for discontinuation were assessed using univariate logistic regression models. Linear mixed models were used to assess QoL and functional status over time. Results Overall, 258 patients were included, of whom 36% discontinued therapy within 2 years after initiation. No geriatric predictive factors for treatment discontinuation were found. Tumour stage was inversely associated with early discontinuation. Patients who discontinued had a worse breast cancer-specific QoL (b = − 4.37; 95% CI − 7.96 to − 0.78; p = 0.017) over the first 2 years, in particular on the future perspective subscale (b = − 11.10; 95% CI − 18.80 to − 3.40; p = 0.005), which did not recover after discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation was not associated with functional improvement. Conclusion A large proportion of older patients discontinue adjuvant endocrine treatment within 2 years after initiation, but geriatric characteristics are not predictive of early discontinuation of treatment. Discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy did not positively affect QoL and functional status, which implies that the observed poorer QoL in this group is probably not caused by adverse effects of endocrine therapy.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to determine the rate and identify correlates of adherence and persistence over five years of treatment with adjuvant endocrine therapy in female breast cancer patients. Methods: Relevant articles were identified from Medline, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and APA PsycArticles. Studies that measured patient adherence in the implementation or persistence phase for a period of at least five years using objective or multiple measures of adherence and investigated correlates of adherence were included. The titles, abstracts and full articles were screened and reviewed by two authors and any discrepancies were discussed with a third author. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Mean rate of adherence at five-year for implementation phase was 66.2% (SD = 17.3%), and mean persistence was 66.8% (SD = 14.5%). On average, adherence decreased by 25.5% (SD = 9.3%) from the first to fifth year. Higher rate of adherence was observed through self-report in comparison to database or medical record. Older age, younger age, higher comorbidity index, depression and adverse effects were associated with lower adherence. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors, received chemotherapy, and prior medication use were associated with improved adherence. Conclusion: Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy decreased from the first to fifth year of treatment. On average, one-third of patients were not adherent to treatment by the fifth year. Nineteen recurring factors were found to be significantly associated with long-term adherence in multiple studies. Further research using objective or multiple measures of adherence are needed to improve validity of results.

The association between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and dementia in men with prostate cancer remains inconclusive. We assessed the association between cumulative ADT exposure and the onset of dementia in a nationwide longitudinal registry of men with prostate cancer.A retrospective analysis of men aged ≥50 years from the CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) registry was performed. The primary outcome was onset of dementia after primary treatment. ADT exposure was expressed as a time-varying independent variable of total ADT exposure. The probability of receiving ADT was estimated using a propensity score. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to determine the association between ADT exposure and dementia with competing risk of death, adjusted for propensity score and clinical covariates among men receiving various treatments.Of 13,570 men 317 (2.3%) were diagnosed with dementia after a median of 7.0 years (IQR 3.0-12.0) of followup. Cumulative ADT use was significantly associated with dementia (HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.40-2.91; p0.01) after adjustment. In a subset of 8,506 men, where propensity score matched by whether or not they received ADT, there was also an association between ADT use and dementia (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.03-2.44; p=0.04). There was no association between primary treatment type and onset of dementia in the 8,489 men in the cohort who did not receive ADT.Cumulative ADT exposure was associated with dementia. This increased risk should be accompanied by a careful discussion of the needs and benefits of ADT in those being considered for treatment.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) includes bilateral orchiectomy or long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists/antagonists. It remains controversial with respect to ADT associated cardiovascular outcomes. Hereby, we compared the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with prostate cancer receiving either surgical castration or GnRH therapies.Using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 8,413 patients receiving GnRH therapies compared with 694 receiving surgical castration from 2008 to 2017. The median followup duration was 3 years.The crude incidences of 3-year mortality and MACCEs were 19.90% vs 26.51% and 8.23% vs 8.65% in patients receiving GnRH therapies or surgical castration, respectively. After adjusting for age, cancer stage and comorbidities, despite no significant differences in MACCEs between groups there was a slight increase in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients receiving surgical castration compared with those receiving GnRH therapies. The mortality adjusted hazard ratios of MACCEs and AMI among patients receiving surgical castration were 1.11- and 1.8-fold higher than those receiving GnRH therapies. Notably, in subgroup analysis regarding cancer stage, patients with cancer stage IV showed the most significantly increasing risk of AMI in those receiving surgical castration compared with GnRH therapies.Collectively, we indicated an increased risk of AMI in patients with prostate cancer, especially in patients receiving surgical castration rather than those receiving GnRH therapies. Our findings highlight concerns regarding the cardiac safety of surgical castration compared with GnRH therapies.

Current guidelines recommend the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. Some observational studies have raised concerns that tamoxifen may be associated with an increased risk of Parkinson disease (PD). However, no studies have directly compared the risk of PD between AIs and tamoxifen in women diagnosed with breast cancer.Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the authors assembled a cohort of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and newly treated with either AIs or tamoxifen between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2017. Patients were followed 1 year after treatment initiation (ie, a 1-year lag) until an incident diagnosis of PD or were censored at death from any cause, the date of transfer out of the practice, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2018). Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to estimate weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PD comparing AIs with tamoxifen and accounting for more than 30 confounders.In all, 30,140 women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were identified: 13,838 initiated AIs, and 16,302 initiated tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were not associated with an increased risk of PD (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60-1.47). Consistent results were observed across all secondary and sensitivity analyses.In this large observational study, the use of AIs, in comparison with tamoxifen, was not associated with an increased risk of PD in women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting.Previous studies have indicated that tamoxifen may increase the risk of Parkinson disease in the treatment of breast cancer. However, no studies have directly compared the risk of Parkinson disease between aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen. This study included 30,140 women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen. Overall, compared with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of Parkinson disease in women diagnosed with breast cancer. This study provides an important addition to the comparative safety profile of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer.

Background Adherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and tamoxifen has considerable survival benefits for postmenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Reduced out-of-pocket costs and treatment-related side effects could increase therapy adherence. Given that individuals’ side effect profiles could differ across AIs, generic AI entry could facilitate switching between AIs to manage side effects and improve adherence. Methods From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare, we selected women first diagnosed with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer at age 65+ years and initiated an AI within 1 year of diagnosis between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2008, or June 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012, and followed them for up to 2 years (N = 20 677). We estimated changes in probabilities of adherence with and without switching for Part D enrollees with and without the low-income subsidy (LIS vs non-LIS) before and after generic entry using linear probability models. Tests of statistical significance are 2-sided. Results After generic entry reduced out-of-pocket costs of AIs (larger reduction for non-LIS), the percentage of women who ever switched from one AI to another AI increased from 8.8% to 14.6% for non-LIS and from 7.3% to 12.5% for LIS. Adherence without switching increased by 8.0 percentage points (pp) for non-LIS (P Conclusions Increased switching after generic entry contributed to increased adherence, suggesting switching allowed better management of treatment-related side effects. Subsidized women also experienced increased adherence with switching after generic entry, suggesting that patients and physicians might not understand Part D benefit design when making decisions.

Objective To describe the treatment and long-term outcomes of patients with acromegaly from all healthcare regions in Sweden. Design and methods Analysis of prospectively reported data from the Swedish Pituitary Register of 698 patients (51% females) with acromegaly diagnosed from 1991 to 2011. The latest clinical follow-up date was December 2012, while mortality data were collected for 28.5 years until June 2019. Results The annual incidence was 3.7/million; 71% of patients had a macroadenoma, 18% had visual field defects, and 25% had at least one pituitary hormone deficiency. Eighty-two percent had pituitary surgery, 10% radiotherapy, and 39% medical treatment. At the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, insulin-like growth factor 1 levels were within the reference range in 69 and 78% of patients, respectively. In linear regression, the proportion of patients with biochemical control including adjuvant therapy at 10 years follow-up increased over time by 1.23% per year. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) (95% CI) for all patients was 1.29 (1.11–1.49). For patients with biochemical control at the latest follow-up, SMR was not increased, neither among patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2000, SMR: 1.06 (0.85–1.33) nor between 2001 and2011, SMR: 0.87 (0.61–1.24). In contrast, non-controlled patients at the latest follow-up from both decades had elevated SMR, 1.90 (1.33–2.72) and 1.98 (1.24–3.14), respectively. Conclusions The proportion of patients with biochemical control increased over time. Patients with biochemically controlled acromegaly have normal life expectancy, while non-controlled patients still have increased mortality. The high rate of macroadenomas and unchanged age at diagnosis illustrates the need for improvements in the management of patients with acromegaly.

Background The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) integrates four clinicopathological variables to estimate the residual disease recurrence risk in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients who have been treated with five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the CTS5. Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies relevant for inclusion in the current review were identified from The Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, and Embase. Results Six papers reported on 30 354 postmenopausal patients (age range 42 to 91 years). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of distant recurrence relative to the low-risk CTS5 category was 5.41 (95% c.i. 4.50 to 6.51; P < 0.05) for the high-risk CTS5 category and 2.32 (95% c.i. 1.90–2.84; P < 0.05) for the intermediate CTS5 category. Three papers reported on 10 425 premenopausal patients (age range 18 to 54 years). The pooled HR of distant recurrence relative to the low-risk CTS5 category was 5.42 (95% c.i. 2.26 to 13.01; P < 0.05) for the high-risk CTS5 category and 2.82 (95% c.i. 1.35 to 5.88; P < 0.05) for the intermediate CTS5 category. Relative to high-risk postmenopausal patients, the mean observed 10-year distant recurrence risk for the high CTS5 category was 13.83 per cent, which differs significantly from the CTS5 estimation of 10-year distant recurrence risk (20.3 per cent, 95% c.i. 17.2 to 24; P = 0.000). Conclusion The CTS5 can predict late distant recurrence risk in pre- and postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. CTS5 overestimates the risk for high-risk patients and thus, its use in these patients warrants caution.

Breast cancer in men (BC-M) is almost exclusively hormone receptor positive. We conducted a large review of the SEER-Medicare linked database to compare endocrine therapy adherence, discontinuation, and survival outcomes of male versus female patients with breast cancer.Study data were obtained through the SEER-Medicare linked database. The study included patients age ≥ 65 years-old diagnosed with breast cancer between 2007 and 2015. The primary endpoints were rates of adherence and discontinuation of endocrine therapy (ET). Adherence was defined as a gap of less than 90 days in-between consecutive Medicare prescriptions. Discontinuation was defined as a gap of greater than 12 months in-between Medicare prescriptions. Secondary endpoint was the association of use of ET with overall survival (OS).Of the 363 male patients on ET, 214 patients (59.0%) were adherent to the therapy, and 149 patients (41.0%) were nonadherent. Of the 20,722 females on ET, 10,752 (51.9%) were adherent to the therapy, and 9970 (48.1%) were nonadherent. 39 male patients (10.7%) discontinued therapy, while 324 (89.3%) did not discontinue therapy. 1849 female patients (8.9%) discontinued therapy, while 18,873 (91.1%) patients did not. Men were significantly more adherent than women (p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in discontinuation among men and women (p = 0.228). Survival was significantly improved in both men (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, p = 0.039) and women (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.87, p 0.001) on ET.Identification of contributing factors impacting adherence and discontinuation is needed to allow physicians to address barriers to long term use of ET.

R-CHOP therapy is generally performed every 3 weeks. We investigated the effects of extending the interval of R-CHOP therapy for > 1 week on the prognoses of patients with non-indolent non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma. Among the 338 patients with non-indolent non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma who received initial chemotherapy at our institution, we focused on 178 patients who received R-CHOP therapy and analyzed the outcomes of the patients stratified by the treatment intervals. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) for the entire population was 82.1%. Patients treated at intervals of ≥ 4 weeks were significantly older, and they had significantly longer follow-up periods and lower relative dose intensity. But the estimated 3-year OS was comparable to those treated at

Prostate brachytherapy techniques are described, concerning both permanent seed implant and high dose rate brachytherapy. The following guidelines are presented: brachytherapy indications, implant procedure for permanent low dose rate implants and high dose rate with source projector, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.

In recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) most patients develop platinum-resistance. On molecular level the NRF2 pathway, a cellular defense mechanism against reactive oxygen species, is induced. In this study, we investigate AKR1C1/2, target of NRF2, in a well-established EOC collective by immunohistochemistry and in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines including platinum-resistant clones. The therapeutic effect of carboplatin and MPA as monotherapy or in combination was assessed by functional assays, using OV90 and OV90cp cells. Molecular mechanisms of action of MPA were investigated by NRF2 silencing and AKR activity measurements. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that AKR1C1/2 is a key player in the development of chemoresistance and an independent indicator for short PFS (23.5 vs. 49.6 months, p = 0.013). Inhibition of AKR1C1/2 by MPA led to a concentration- and time-dependent decline of OV90 viability and to an increased response to CP in vitro. By NRF2 silencing, however, the effects of MPA treatment were reduced. Concludingly, our data suggest that a combination therapy of carboplatin and MPA might be a promising therapeutic approach to increase response rates of EOC patients, which should be explored in clinical context.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally. To prevent relapse and prolong disease-free survival, adjuvant endocrine treatment such as selective oestrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors are being used. However, such oestrogen-blocking agents can cause serious adverse events. Community pharmacists are ideally positioned to ensure that such adverse events are addressed promptly and competently through their comprehensive knowledge of medicines. To identify the skills and training required to improve community pharmacists' communication in breast cancer settings regarding adjuvant endocrine treatments and to propose a conceptual framework for setting up such breast cancer service, we reviewed the literature using PubMed and performed a brief survey of eight community pharmacists using semi-structured interview method. To improve pharmacists' competencies in breast cancer settings, a clear framework for the proposed service on the national level is required. In addition to communication skills training programmes and problem-solving competences, reviewing the pharmacy pre-registration training curriculum and creating appropriate platforms that monitor medications in breast cancer patients are advocated.

PURPOSE Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for advanced breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, the potential value of adding palbociclib to endocrine therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer has not been confirmed. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the prospective, randomized, phase III PALLAS trial, patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg orally once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) with adjuvant endocrine therapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy alone (for at least 5 years). The primary end point of the study was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary end points were invasive breast cancer–free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, locoregional cancer-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Among 5,796 patients enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 years, 5,761 were included in the intention-to-treat population. At the final protocol-defined analysis, at a median follow-up of 31 months, iDFS events occurred in 253 of 2,884 (8.8%) patients who received palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and in 263 of 2,877 (9.1%) patients who received endocrine therapy alone, with similar results between the two treatment groups (iDFS at 4 years: 84.2% v 84.5%; hazard ratio, 0.96; CI, 0.81 to 1.14; P = .65). No significant differences were observed for secondary time-to-event end points, and subgroup analyses did not show any differences by subgroup. There were no new safety signals for palbociclib in this trial. CONCLUSION At this final analysis of the PALLAS trial, the addition of adjuvant palbociclib to standard endocrine therapy did not improve outcomes over endocrine therapy alone in patients with early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.

Basal-like breast cancer is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with the worst prognosis. Despite its high recurrence rate, chemotherapy is the only treatment for basal-like breast cancer, which lacks expression of hormone receptors. In contrast, luminal A tumors express ERα and can undergo endocrine therapy for treatment. Previous studies have tried to develop effective treatments for basal-like patients using various therapeutics but failed due to the complex and dynamic nature of the disease. In this study, we performed a transcriptomic analysis of patients with breast cancer to construct a simplified but essential molecular regulatory network model. Network control analysis identified potential targets and elucidated the underlying mechanisms of reprogramming basal-like cancer cells into luminal A cells. Inhibition of BCL11A and HDAC1/2 effectively drove basal-like cells to transition to luminal A cells and increased ERα expression, leading to increased tamoxifen sensitivity. High expression of BCL11A and HDAC1/2 correlated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. These findings identify mechanisms regulating breast cancer phenotypes and suggest the potential to reprogram basal-like breast cancer cells to enhance their targetability. Significance: A network model enables investigation of mechanisms regulating the basal-to-luminal transition in breast cancer, identifying BCL11A and HDAC1/2 as optimal targets that can induce basal-like breast cancer reprogramming and endocrine therapy sensitivity.

CYP2D6 gene polymorphism has a profound impact upon the effect of tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. However, it had never been reported whether the adverse drug reactions vary by CYP2D6 metabolic status for patients treated with tamoxifen or toremifene. We conducted a retrospective study in breast cancer patients to investigate the impact of CYP2D6 metabolic status on liver dysfunction events, gynecological events and dyslipidemia events. According to CYP2D6*10 (100C → T) genotype, the enrolled patients were further categorized into four cohorts (extensive metabolizers taking tamoxifen [EM + TAM], extensive metabolizers taking toremifene [EM + TOR], intermediate metabolizers taking tamoxifen [IM + TAM], and intermediate metabolizers taking toremifene [IM + TOR]). A total of 192 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up time of 26.2 months. In EM + TAM cohort, the risks of liver dysfunction events (P = .004) and gynecological events (P = .004) were significantly higher compared to EM + TOR cohort. In IM + TAM cohort, the risks of liver dysfunction events (P = .14) and gynecological events (P = .99) were not significantly different from IM + TOR cohort. A significant decrease of total cholesterol was observed in EM + TAM cohort around 1 year after taking tamoxifen (P .001). Significant interactions between CYP2D6 metabolic status and endocrine agents were observed in terms of liver dysfunction events (P-interaction = .007) and gynecological events (P-interaction = .026). These findings suggested that CYP2D6 gene polymorphism played a significant role in predicting liver dysfunction, gynecological diseases and lipid metabolism changes among patients taking tamoxifen or toremifene.

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. In order to reduce the risks of its recurrence, endocrine therapies, such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are commonly administered. Despite having a similar efficacy in preventing breast cancer recurrence, these drugs differ in terms of instigating cardiovascular morbidities. Recent randomized controlled trials and cohort studies provide inconclusive evidence of the cardiovascular risks associated with the administration of these endocrine therapies. This present review and meta-analysis evaluates the comparative cardiovascular adverse event outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular adverse outcomes, such as venous thromboembolism, heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with breast cancer receiving tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.A systematic search of the academic literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases, including Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to compare the cardiovascular adverse events (i.e. venous thromboembolism, heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke) in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.From 993 studies, 20 eligible studies were identified, with 174,142 female breast cancer patients (mean age: 67.4 ± 3.8 years). A meta-analysis revealed insignificantly (p 0.05) higher risks of venous thromboembolism (Odds ratio, 95% CI: 1.70, 0.91-3.18) in patients treated with tamoxifen as compared to aromatase inhibitors. We also observed insignificantly higher risks of stroke (0.93, 0.45-1.91), angina (0.77, 0.12-4.59), myocardial infarction (0.74, 0.30-1.79), and heart failure (0.81, 0.22-2.91) in patients receiving aromatase inhibitors as compared to tamoxifen.The study provides evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular adverse outcomes between breast cancer patients consuming tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. The study reports an insignificant increase in the events of stroke, angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors as compared to tamoxifen. The study also reports that tamoxifen treatment is associated with an insignificant increase in the events of venous thromboembolism as compared to treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Palmitoylation is essential for the classic hallmarks of cancers through regulating protein stability and protein-protein interactions. ZDHHC22, as a well-known member of palmitoyltrans-ferase family, its role has not been revealed in cancer. We found ZDHHC22 expression was significantly lower in estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancer (BrCa) tissues and cell lines, and its expression was positively corelated with the clinical prognosis of BrCa patients. The lower expression of ZDHHC22 might be caused by its promoter methylation. ZDHHC22 inhibited the proliferation capability of BrCa cells both in vitro and in vivo, depending on its encoding palmitoyltransferase activity. In terms of the mechanisms, ZDHHC22 reduced mTOR stability via palmitoylation and decreased the activation of the AKT signaling pathway. Furthermore, ectopic expression of ZDHHC22 could restore the sensitivity to tamoxifen therapy in MCF-7R cells. Collectively, ZDHHC22 may serve as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target, providing the theoretical foundation for exploring specific palmitoylation drugs targeted, especially for endocrine therapy-resistant BrCa patients.

Androgen receptor signaling blockade is perhaps the first example of targeted therapy in the treatment of cancer. Since the initial observations that prostate cancers depend on hormone signaling, hormonal therapies remain a cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy has been shown to improve outcomes involving treatment of prostate cancers with radiotherapy, though a mechanistic understanding into the optimal sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy remains incomplete. In this review we highlight key clinical trials designed to study combinations of hormonal and radiotherapies and introduce recent discoveries into the complex biology of androgen receptor signaling and DNA damage and repair. These emerging mechanistic and translational studies may have profound implications on both our understanding of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy combinations and the development of novel treatment strategies for locally-advanced and metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer.

Background: Aromatase inhibitor therapy is currently the preferred choice in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. This article reviews the ocular side effects of treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science and Google scholar. Results: After duplication removal, 14 clinical studies and 5 case reports, published between 2008 and 2021, were identified. Most frequently, AI treatment resulted in minor to moderate dry eye symptoms. “De novo” onset of Sjogren syndrome during AI therapy was also reported. Retinal and optic nerve side effects varied from mild, subclinical anatomic and functional impairment to severe decreased vision, secondary to hemi-central retinal artery occlusion, bilateral optic neuritis or uveitis with bilateral macular edema. Conclusion: Visual disturbances encountered during AI treatment may be underestimated. Ophthalmic screening is important for early detection and appropriate treatment.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast-cancer assay has been clinically useful in predicting a chemotherapy benefit in hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, axillary lymph-node–negative breast cancer. In women with positive lymph-node disease, the role of the recurrence score with respect to predicting a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. METHODS: In a prospective trial, we randomly assigned women with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, and a recurrence score of 25 or lower (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis) to endocrine therapy only or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy. The primary objective was to determine the effect of chemotherapy on invasive disease–free survival and whether the effect was influenced by the recurrence score. Secondary end points included distant relapse–free survival. RESULTS: A total of 5083 women (33.2% premenopausal and 66.8% postmenopausal) underwent randomization, and 5018 participated in the trial. At the prespecified third interim analysis, the chemotherapy benefit with respect to increasing invasive disease–free survival differed according to menopausal status (P = 0.008 for the comparison of chemotherapy benefit in premenopausal and postmenopausal participants), and separate prespecified analyses were conducted. Among postmenopausal women, invasive disease–free survival at 5 years was 91.9% in the endocrine-only group and 91.3% in the chemoendocrine group, with no chemotherapy benefit (hazard ratio for invasive disease recurrence, new primary cancer [breast cancer or another type], or death, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.26; P = 0.89). Among premenopausal women, invasive disease–free survival at 5 years was 89.0% with endocrine-only therapy and 93.9% with chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P = 0.002), with a similar increase in distant relapse–free survival (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; P = 0.009). The relative chemotherapy benefit did not increase as the recurrence score increased. CONCLUSIONS: Among premenopausal women with one to three positive lymph nodes and a recurrence score of 25 or lower, those who received chemoendocrine therapy had longer invasive disease–free survival and distant relapse–free survival than those who received endocrine-only therapy, whereas postmenopausal women with similar characteristics did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; RxPONDER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01272037.)

Background Extending endocrine therapy from 5 to 10 years is recommended for women with invasive estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancers. We evaluated the benefits and harms of the five additional years of therapy. Methods An established Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) model used a lifetime horizon with national and clinical trial data on treatment efficacy and adverse events and other‐cause mortality among multiple birth cohorts of U.S. women ages 25–79 newly diagnosed with ER+, non‐metastatic breast cancer. We assumed 100% use of therapy. Outcomes included life years (LYs), quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs), and breast cancer mortality. Results were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses tested a 15‐year time horizon and alternative assumptions. Results Extending tamoxifen therapy duration among women ages 25–49 reduced the lifetime probability of breast cancer death from 11.9% to 9.3% (absolute difference 2.6%). This translates to a gain of 0.77 LYs (281 days)/woman (undiscounted). Adverse events reduce this gain to 0.44 QALYs and after discounting, gains are 0.20 QALYs (73 days)/woman. Extended aromatase inhibitor therapy in women 50–79 had small absolute benefits and gains were offset by adverse events (loss of 0.06 discounted QALYs). There were greater gains with extended endocrine therapy for women with node‐positive versus negative cancers, but only women ages 25–49 and 50–59 had a net QALY gain. All gains were reduced with less than 100% treatment completion. Conclusion The extension of endocrine therapy from 5 to 10 years modestly improved lifetime breast cancer outcomes, but in some women, treatment‐related adverse events may outweigh benefits., Simulation modeling was used to evaluate extended endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor‐positive non‐metastatic breast cancer. Results indicate that extension of endocrine therapy from 5 to 10 years modestly improves life years in some groups but adverse events may outweigh benefits.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

PURPOSE This guideline updates recommendations of the ASCO guideline on chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor (HR)–negative. METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review guided by a signals approach to identify new, potentially practice-changing data that might translate into revised guideline recommendations. RESULTS The Expert Panel reviewed abstracts from the literature review and retained 14 articles. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients with triple-negative, programmed cell death ligand-1–positive MBC may be offered the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Patients with triple-negative, programmed cell death ligand-1–negative MBC should be offered single-agent chemotherapy rather than combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment, although combination regimens may be offered for life-threatening disease. Patients with triple-negative MBC who have received at least two prior therapies for MBC should be offered treatment with sacituzumab govitecan. Patients with triple-negative MBC with germline BRCA mutations previously treated with chemotherapy may be offered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rather than chemotherapy. Patients with HR-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative MBC for whom chemotherapy is being considered should be offered single–agent chemotherapy rather than combination chemotherapy, although combination regimens may be offered for highly symptomatic or life-threatening disease. Patients with HR-positive MBC with disease progression on an endocrine agent may be offered treatment with either endocrine therapy with or without targeted therapy or single-agent chemotherapy. Patients with HR-positive MBC with germline BRCA mutations no longer benefiting from endocrine therapy may be offered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rather than chemotherapy. No recommendation regarding when a patient's care should be transitioned to hospice or best supportive care alone is possible. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

PURPOSE To update recommendations of the ASCO systemic therapy for hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) guideline. METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify new, potentially practice-changing data. RESULTS Fifty-one articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Alpelisib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) should be offered to postmenopausal patients, and to male patients, with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, PIK3CA-mutated, ABC, or MBC following prior endocrine therapy with or without a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor. Clinicians should use next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue or cell-free DNA in plasma to detect PIK3CA mutations. If no mutation is found in cell-free DNA, testing in tumor tissue, if available, should be used as this will detect a small number of additional patients with PIK3CA mutations. There are insufficient data at present to recommend routine testing for ESR1 mutations to guide therapy for HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC. For BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer, olaparib or talazoparib should be offered in the 1st-line through 3rd-line setting. A nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) and a CDK4/6 inhibitor should be offered to postmenopausal women with treatment-naïve HR-positive MBC. Fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor should be offered to patients with progressive disease during treatment with AIs (or who develop a recurrence within 1 year of adjuvant AI therapy) with or without one line of prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, or as first-line therapy. Treatment should be limited to those without prior exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Background Whereas the genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant breast cancer has been intensely characterized in previously treated cases with local or distant recurrence, comparably little is known about genomic alterations conveying primary non‐responsiveness to endocrine treatment in luminal early breast cancer. Methods In this study, 622 estrogen receptor‐expressing breast cancer cases treated with short‐term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET) from the WSG‐ADAPT trial (NCT01779206) were analyzed for genetic alterations associated with impaired endocrine proliferative response (EPR) to 3‐week pET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. EPR was categorized as optimal (post‐pET Ki67, Early recognition of endocrine resistance could be enabled by impaired suppression of proliferation after short‐term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET). Impaired endocrine proliferative response (EPR, post‐pET Ki67 ≥10%) sorts out cancers carrying TP53 mutations.

Background The use of endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer, particularly aromatase inhibitor therapy has been associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture in clinical trials. We sought to validate this observation in real-world practice. Methods We used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2012. Patients were classified by use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed until 2017 for a new diagnosis of an osteoporotic fracture. A multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was adjusting for age, medical co-morbidities, medication use and duration of endocrine therapy. Results We identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor as compared to 27% with tamoxifen. Our multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture between patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor when compared with tamoxifen [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–1.23, p-value = 0.18]. The 5-year rate of osteoporotic fracture for patients treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen was 7.5% and 6.9%, respectively. A completed sensitivity analysis did observe a decreased risk of fracture associated with tamoxifen usage over time. Conclusion We could not detect a significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture among patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen. Nonetheless, the risk with tamoxifen was numerically lower and significantly decreased when accounting for total duration of endocrine therapy., Highlights • Our real-world study investigated the osteoporotic fracture risk among early-stage post-menopausal breast cancer patients. • No significant difference in fracture rates was observed among patients treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. • The risk of osteoporotic fracture decreased with tamoxifen usage over time. • Bone health should be carefully monitored and optimized among breast cancer patients recieving endocrine therapy.