Search

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been proved as a significant risk factor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after several waves of pandemic. This study aims to further investigate impact of COVID-19 on prognosis of DVT following anticoagulation treatment. Methods A total of 197 patients with initially detected DVT and meanwhile accomplishing at least 3 months anticoagulation treatment were identified from our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. DVT characteristics, clinical data, and exposure to COVID-19 were recorded for multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify DVT aggravation related risk factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline covariates. Kaplan–Meier curves and Log-Rank test were performed to exhibit distribution of DVT aggravation among different subgroups. Results In 2022, patients exhibited higher incidence rates of DVT aggravation compared to those in 2021 (HR:2.311, P = 0.0018). The exposure to COVID-19, increased red blood cell count, increased D-dimer level and reduced prothrombin time were found to be associated with DVT aggravation (P

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been proved as a significant risk factor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after several waves of pandemic. This study aims to further investigate impact of COVID-19 on prognosis of DVT following anticoagulation treatment. Methods: A total of 197 patients with initially detected DVT and meanwhile accomplishing at least 3 months anticoagulation treatment were identified from our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. DVT characteristics, clinical data, and exposure to COVID-19 were recorded for multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify DVT aggravation related risk factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline covariates. Kaplan–Meier curves and Log-Rank test were performed to exhibit distribution of DVT aggravation among different subgroups. Results: In 2022, patients exhibited higher incidence rates of DVT aggravation compared to those in 2021 (HR:2.311, P = 0.0018). The exposure to COVID-19, increased red blood cell count, increased D-dimer level and reduced prothrombin time were found to be associated with DVT aggravation (P < 0.0001, P = 0.014, P < 0.001, P = 0.024), with only exposure to COVID-19 showing a significant difference between two years (2022:59/102, 57.84%, 2021:7/88, 7.37%, P < 0.001). In PSM-matched cohorts, the risk for DVT aggravation was 3.182 times higher in COVID-19 group compared to the control group (P < 0.0001). Exposure to COVID-19 increased the risk of DVT aggravation among patients who completed three months anticoagulant therapy (HR: 5.667, P < 0.0001), but did not increase incidence rate among patients who completed more than three months anticoagulant therapy (HR:1.198, P = 0.683). For patients with distal DVT, COVID-19 was associated with a significant increased risk of DVT recurrence (HR:4.203, P < 0.0001). Regarding principal diagnoses, incidence rate of DVT aggravation was significantly higher in COVID-19 group compared to the control group (Advanced lung cancer: P = 0.011, surgical history: P = 0.0365, benign lung diseases: P = 0.0418). Conclusions: Our study reveals an increased risk of DVT aggravation following COVID-19 during anticoagulation treatment, particularly among patients with distal DVT or those who have completed only three months anticoagulant therapy. Adverse effects of COVID-19 on DVT prognosis were observed across various benign and malignant respiratory diseases. Additionally, extended-term anticoagulant therapy was identified as an effective approach to enhance DVT control among patients with COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has revealed a complex interplay between inflammation and coagulation, leading to the emergence of the concept of thrombo-inflammation. This concept recognizes that COVID-19 is not solely a respiratory illness, but a systemic disease with significant vascular and hematological components. COVID-19 is associated with an unusual prothrombotic state, with intense endothelial activation leading to vasculopathy, cytokine storm, complement system activation and a hypercoagulability state (the activation of platelets and the coagulation cascade, impaired fibrinolysis). The aim of this review is to discuss the different pathological pathways described in COVID-19 that lead to thromboembolic events. Widespread vaccination and post-COVID-19 immunization allows control over the severity of this pandemic. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19 can improve the management of frail patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For over two years, the world has been facing the epidemiological and health challenge of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Growing problems are also complications after the development of COVID-19 in the form of post and long- COVID syndromes, posing a challenge for the medical community, both for clinicians and the scientific world. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications, especially thromboembolic complications, which are associated with both thrombosis of small and very small vessels due to immunothrombosis, and the development of venous thromboembolism. Low molecular wight heparin (LMHW) are the basic agents used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications in COVID-19. There is still a great deal of controversy regarding both the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications, including the prophylaxis dose or the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment in patients with an episode of venous thromboembolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of stent thrombectomy alone or combined with intermediate catheter aspiration for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Method: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 7 patients with severe CVST who received endovascular treatment at our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020. The patients had at least one adverse prognostic factor (mental status disorder, comatose state, intracerebral hemorrhage, or thrombosis of the deep venous system). Results: The median age was 51 years. Three patients were women. Two or more venous sinuses were in involved in 5 patients. All patients received systemic anticoagulant therapy before endovascular therapy. Neurological deterioration was the main reason for patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis undergoing intravascular therapy. The median time from admission to intravascular therapy was 3 days (1–9 days). Primary endpoints: 6 patients (85.7%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 0 at day 90, and 1 patient (14.3%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 2 at day 90. Secondary endpoints: complete recanalization was achieved in 4 cases (57.1%) and partial recanalization in 3 cases (42.9%). Conclusion: Stent thrombectomy, combined with intermediate catheter aspiration, balloon dilation, and regional thrombolysis/anticoagulation treatment, is an effective strategy to treat severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis patients who had inadequate response to anticoagulant therapy. This strategy can quickly eliminate the occluded venous sinus and improve prognosis of severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of stent thrombectomy alone or combined with intermediate catheter aspiration for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.MethodWe retrospectively collected the clinical data of 7 patients with severe CVST who received endovascular treatment at our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020. The patients had at least one adverse prognostic factor (mental status disorder, comatose state, intracerebral hemorrhage, or thrombosis of the deep venous system).ResultsThe median age was 51 years. Three patients were women. Two or more venous sinuses were in involved in 5 patients. All patients received systemic anticoagulant therapy before endovascular therapy. Neurological deterioration was the main reason for patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis undergoing intravascular therapy. The median time from admission to intravascular therapy was 3 days (1–9 days). Primary endpoints: 6 patients (85.7%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 0 at day 90, and 1 patient (14.3%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 2 at day 90. Secondary endpoints: complete recanalization was achieved in 4 cases (57.1%) and partial recanalization in 3 cases (42.9%).ConclusionStent thrombectomy, combined with intermediate catheter aspiration, balloon dilation, and regional thrombolysis/anticoagulation treatment, is an effective strategy to treat severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis patients who had inadequate response to anticoagulant therapy. This strategy can quickly eliminate the occluded venous sinus and improve prognosis of severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Patient education about venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention is needed to prevent complications and costly re-hospitalization. Nurses are uniquely positioned to provide vital education as patients transition from the inpatient setting to after discharge. Still, little is known about patient knowledge deficits and those of their caregivers. The purpose of this study was to explore VTE prevention knowledge in a sample of older hip fracture patients and family caregivers. At the time of hospital discharge, surveys were completed by hip fracture surgery patients (≥65; n=30) and family caregivers (n=30). Participants reported needs for more prophylactic anticoagulation and side effects education. Mean education satisfaction was 3.49 out of 5 among patients and 3.83 among caregivers. Focused patient education regarding the wisdom of VTE prevention, potential risks involved, and patient and caregiver roles in advocating for better prevention measures is needed for these patients at risk for hospital readmission secondary to VTE.

Objective: Thrombolytic and anticoagulation therapy modalities are the possible treatment for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the indications are still the subject of debate. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of thrombolytic and standard anticoagulation treatment modalities on mortality and also to determine the safety of thrombolytic treatment in subjects with submassive PE. Materials and Methods: Subjects with submassive PE were recruited from the intensive care unit (ICU). Demographic data, comorbidity, bedside echocardiography (ECHO) findings, treatment procedure, treatment-related side effects, and total length of stay in the hospital and ICU were collected. Control ECHO was performed 48 h after the initiation of treatment. Short-term and 1-year mortality rates were recorded. The correlation between the increased risk for major bleeding and thrombolytic treatment was assessed. Results: A total of 54 subjects were enrolled during the study period. The median age of the subjects was 66 (54–73) years. Of the 54 subjects, 18 (33.3%) underwent thrombolytic treatment, and 36 (66.7%) received standard anticoagulation therapy. Short-term and 1-year mortality rates were statistically lower in subjects who received thrombolytic therapy (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). The reduction in mean pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly higher in the thrombolytic treatment group (p

Background: Patient frailty amongst patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased risk of mortality. Additional evidence is needed to evaluate effective and safe NVAF treatment in this patient population. Objectives: This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study compared the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) amongst frail NVAF patients prescribed nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin. Methods: This comparative retrospective observational study of frail, older NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin from 01JAN2013‐30SEP2015 was conducted using Medicare and 3 US commercial claims databases. To compare each drug, 6 propensity score‐matched (PSM) cohorts were created. Patient cohorts were pooled from 4 databases after PSM. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of S/SE and MB. Results: Amongst NVAF patients, 34% (N = 150 487) met frailty criteria. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of S/SE vs warfarin (apixaban: HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.69; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72–0.87). For MB, apixaban (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57–0.66) and dabigatran (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70–0.89) were associated with a lower risk and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08–1.21) was associated with a higher risk vs warfarin. Conclusion: Amongst this cohort of frail NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with varying rates of stroke/SE and MB compared with warfarin. Due to the lack of real‐world data regarding OAC treatment in frail patients, these results may inform clinical practice in the treatment of this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate the decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non‐VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods: Multicentre prospective cohort study including 1667 patients with nonvalvular AF. The eGFR was assessed by the CKD‐EPI formula at baseline and during follow‐up. The primary endpoint of the study was the median annual decline of eGFR according to VKA (n = 743) or NOAC (n = 924) use. As secondary endpoints, we analysed the transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the eGFR class worsening. Results: Median age was 73.7 ± 9.1 years and 43.3% were women. VKA‐treated patients showed an eGFR decline of −2.11 (interquartile range [IQR] –5.68/−0.62), which was −0.27 (IQR –9.00/4.54, P < 0.001 vs VKAs), −1.21 (IQR –9.98/4.02, P = 0.004 vs VKAs) and −1.32 (IQR –8.70/3.99, P = 0.003 vs VKAs) in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 was lower in dabigatran‐ and apixaban‐treated patients: odds ratio (OR) 0.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.298‐0.813, P = 0.006 and OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.276‐0.728, P = 0.001, respectively. A lower rate of eGFR class worsening was found in all groups of NOACs compared to VKAs. No difference between full and reduced dose of NOAC was found. Subgroup analysis showed that the association between NOAC and eGFR changes was markedly reduced in diabetic patients. Conclusion: Patients prescribed NOACs showed a lower decline of renal function compared to those prescribed VKAs. This effect was partially lost in patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Hip fracture patients in general are elderly and they often have comorbidities that may necessitate anticoagulation treatment, such as warfarin. It has been emphasized that these patients benefit from surgery without delay to avoid complications and reduce mortality. This creates a challenge for patients on warfarin and especially for those with trochanteric or subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with intramedullary nailing, as this is associated with increased bleeding compared to other types of hip fractures and surgical methods. The aim of the study was to evaluate if early surgery (within 24 h) of trochanteric or subtrochanteric hip fractures using intramedullary nailing is safe in patients on warfarin treatment after fast reversal of the warfarin effect. Methods A retrospective case-control study including 198 patients: 99 warfarin patients and 99 patients without anticoagulants as a 1:1 ratio control group matched for age, gender and surgical implant. All patients were operated within 24 h with a cephalomedullary nail due to a trochanteric or subtrochanteric hip fracture. All patients on warfarin were reversed if necessary to INR ≤ 1.5 before surgery using vitamin K and/or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Per- and postoperative data, transfusion rates, adverse events and mortality was compared. Results There were no significant differences in the calculated blood-loss, in-house adverse events or mortality (in-house, 30-day or 1-year) between the groups. There were no significant differences in the pre- or peroperative transfusions rates, but there was an increased rate of postoperative transfusions in the control group (p = 0.02). Conclusion We found that surgical treatment with intramedullary nailing within 24 h of patients with trochanteric or subtrochanteric hip fractures on warfarin medication after reversing its effect to INR ≤ 1.5 using vitamin K and/or PCC is safe.

Background/Aim: This study analyzed the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 with major events during the first days of hospitalization. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients admitted to two hospitals in Athens, Greece. The characteristics of patients with COVID-19 who suffered the primary endpoint (venous thromboembolic events, intubation, and death) during the first days of hospitalization were analyzed. Results: Among 95 patients included in the analysis, 21 presented with major adverse events during a median follow-up of 13 days. More than 50% of these patients presented with a major event during the first 3 days. Anticoagulation treatment was inversely associated with the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint [hazard ratio=0.16 (95% confidence interval=0.06-0.47)]. Patients with major events were older, with lower baseline SatO2, and higher number of Wells’ criteria and Charlson comorbidity index. Among these patients, those with hypertension were at higher risk for early occurrence of events (≤ first three days of hospitalization). Conclusion: Major adverse events may occur early in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with a high-risk profile. Anticoagulation treatment appears to reduce this risk and thus prompt thromboprophylaxis should be employed in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Medical Review - Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Medical University - Sofia, Central Medical Library and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: The aim of the study is to retrospectively assess the effectivity of endovascular embolization in anticoagulated patients with hemodynamically significant retroperitoneal, anterior abdominal wall or chest wall bleeding. Methods: Between June 2014 and March 2018, totally 26 embolization procedures in 25 patients (12 males, 13 females, age range between 62-86 years) with spontaneous bleeding due to ongoing anticoagulation treatment were performed in one center. Indication for procedure was hemodynamically significant bleeding requiring fluid resuscitation and signs of dynamic contrast media extravasation on CT angiography. The procedure itself was performed by selective or superselective embolization of bleeding artery using various embolization agents: acrylate glue, polyvinylalcohol or gelatine foam. Results: Sixteen patients with retroperitoneal bleeding, six patients with rectus sheath hematomas, one patient with bleeding to both retroperitoneal and abdominal wall compartment and two patients with chest wall bleeding were treated in our department. All the patients proved signs of contrast media extravasation on CT angiography, digital subtraction angiography showed contrast media extravasation in 73,1% (19/26 procedures). Technical success rate was 96,1% (25/26 procedures), clinical success rate was 80,1% (21/26 procedures). Total follow-up was 1 day- 33 months (median 4 months), 4 patients died during follow-up, 30-day mortality was 16%. Surgical procedure following endovascular treatment had to be performed in 20% of cases (5 patients - in 3 cases due to ongoing bleeding, in 2 cases to evacuate large hematoma). Conclusion: Endovascular embolization in anticoagulated patients with spontaneous bleeding is an effective method which enables to replace the more invasive surgical procedure especially in higher age patients with several serious diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: To present the new guidelines and therapeutic options regarding cerebrovascular complications of cancer, mainly ischemic stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC). Recent findings: A temporal trend study (2019) revealed that clinicians are still reluctant to apply thrombolysis to cancer patients, although two new studies (2018) reported no increased mortality. Several clinical trials on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed their superiority or, at least, non-inferiority compared with low molecular weight heparins in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (2018–2019). These trials helped in formulating the new guidelines that are being published and the decisions made for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) as a whole. A new DOAC antidote was also officially released (US 2018, Europe 2019). Summary: Thrombolysis is safe in a malignancy setting, thus cancer per se should not be considered a contraindication for thrombolysis. Clinical trials assessing the newest DOACs for cancer-associated arterial thrombosis are scarce; however, based on data from VTE studies, the newest DOACs seem to be safe for CAT in patients that are not in high risk of bleeding or suffering from certain malignancies. The treatment should not be ceased after 6 months, but rather continued as long as the cancer remains active. Decompressive craniectomy should maintain its place in patients with CVST in risk of herniation. Last, the future also holds much promise on the role of novel compounds to be used in LMC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective　To summarize the factors and the corresponding treatments for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) complicated by thrombocytopenia, and provide medical advises for clinical treatment. Methods　Literatures and case reports were analyzed and summarized. Results　Thrombocytopenia in patient with CHD could be mainly divided into two types, one group was induced by the antithrombotic therapies for CHD, and the other group was caused by some concurrent diseases or combined non-antithrombotic medications. There were different medical decisions and prognoses according to the causes in different groups. Conclusion　The treatment strategies of CHD will be considered in the CHD patients with thrombocytopenia. Identifying thrombocytopenia by monitoring the platelet counts in early stage, finding out the causes quickly and providing proper treatments are the key for the prognosis of the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A substantial proportion of atrial fibrillation patients initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are vitamin K antagonists (VKA)‐experienced, for example switchers from VKA to DOAC. With this study, we aimed to summarize available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of DOAC vs VKA in real‐life VKA‐experienced atrial fibrillation patients. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library systematically for English‐language studies indexed any time before October 2018. We included studies of VKA‐experienced atrial fibrillation patients initiating DOAC therapy, with continued VKA therapy as comparator. Outcomes included arterial thromboembolism and bleeding. When appropriate, meta‐analysis was performed by calculating pooled, weighted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight cohort studies comparing VKA‐experienced DOAC (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) users with continued VKA users were included. When comparing DOAC to VKA, an increased risk of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction was found for dabigatran (pooled aHR of 1.61 [95% CI 1.19‐2.19, I2 = 65%] and 1.29 [95% CI 1.10‐1.52, I2 = 0%], respectively), but not for rivaroxaban. The use of dabigatran in VKA‐experienced users was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (pooled aHR 1.63 [95% CI 1.36‐1.94, I2 = 30%]), but a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (pooled aHR 0.45 [95% CI 0.32‐0.64, I2 = 0%]). In conclusion, the use of dabigatran in prior VKA users in clinical practice was associated with a slightly increased risk of arterial thromboembolism and gastrointestinal bleeding, but a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding. Importantly, observational studies of real‐life VKA‐experienced oral anticoagulant users may be confounded by the reason for switching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a primary risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS). • Catheter ablation (CA) reduces the risk of IS in nonvalvular AF patients. • The STABLED trial will evaluate CA + edoxaban in AF patients who had a recent IS. • The primary endpoint is a composite of IS, embolism, death, and hospitalization. • The aim is to determine the optimal treatment for patients with AF and recent IS. Catheter ablation (CA) has been reported to reduce risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in retrospective studies. However, the risks and benefits of CA have not been well elucidated in patients with NVAF and who have suffered a recent ischemic stroke in prospective randomized trials. Thus, the aim of the STABLED clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CA with anticoagulant therapy using edoxaban in patients with NVAF and a history of recent ischemic stroke. The STABLED trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, standard medication-controlled study in Japan. The target patient number is 250, comprising 125 patients receiving standard medication and 125 receiving CA. For patients allocated to the CA group, ablation is to be performed between 1 to 6 months from the onset of index stroke. The observation period will be 3 years from the day of random allocation of the final patient to any of the groups. The primary outcome measure is the composite of recurrence of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure. This study will investigate the effectiveness and safety of CA and basic anticoagulation treatment with edoxaban for patients with NVAF who have suffered a recent ischemic stroke. The aim is to determine the best evidence for an optimal treatment strategy for patients with NVAF and recent stroke. Trial registration: UMIN000031424/ NCT03777631. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights from the article: Subgroup meta-analysis yielded an ARN prevalence of 20% among studies that included patients with fewer comorbidities Who had experienced ARN and anticoagulated patients without ARN, patients with ARN were 91% more likely to die (risk Keywords: anticoagulant-related nephropathy, meta-analysis, systematic review, warfarin, warfarin-related nephropathy Appeared to be a risk factor for ARN (33.3% in patients with ARN ARN and anticoagulated patients not exposed to ARN, patients.

Objective: Thrombolytic and anticoagulation therapy modalities are the possible treatment for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the indications are still the subject of debate. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of thrombolytic and standard anticoagulation treatment modalities on mortality and also to determine the safety of thrombolytic treatment in subjects with submassive PE. Materials and Methods: Subjects with submassive PE were recruited from the intensive care unit (ICU). Demographic data, comorbidity, bedside echocardiography (ECHO) findings, treatment procedure, treatment-related side effects, and total length of stay in the hospital and ICU were collected. Control ECHO was performed 48 h after the initiation of treatment. Short-term and 1-year mortality rates were recorded. The correlation between the increased risk for major bleeding and thrombolytic treatment was assessed. Results: A total of 54 subjects were enrolled during the study period. The median age of the subjects was 66 (54-73) years. Of the 54 subjects, 18 (33.3%) underwent thrombolytic treatment, and 36 (66.7%) received standard anticoagulation therapy. Short-term and 1-year mortality rates were statistically lower in subjects who received thrombolytic therapy (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). The reduction in mean pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly higher in the thrombolytic treatment group (p<0.001). Risk for major bleeding was similar between the two. Conclusion: Thrombolytic therapy may reduce the mortality rates in subjects with submassive PE without an increase in the risk of major bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate risk factors for stroke in patients initiating oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in Norway and their association with receiving DOACs versus warfarin.Methods: From nationwide registries, we identified naïve users initiating treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2015 in Norway. We studied temporal changes in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and its component risk factors. We used multiple logistic regressions to identify CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors associated with receiving DOACs versus warfarin in 2015.Results: From 2010 to 2015, the yearly number of new oral anticoagulant users increased from 7588 to 13,344. All new users initiated warfarin in 2010, while 86% initiated a DOAC in 2015. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score decreased from 3.2 (SD 1.7) to 3.1 (SD 1.6) in the same period. Vascular disease (0.56 [0.49-0.63]), congestive heart failure (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.58-0.72]), and diabetes (0.83 [0.73-0.95]) decreased the odds of receiving DOACs instead of warfarin, and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/arterial thromboembolism (1.31 [1.12-1.54]), age 65-74 (1.23 [1.06-1.43]), and female sex (1.22 [1.10-1.36]) increased it. Age ≥ 75 (reference age < 65) and hypertension had no impact.Conclusions: The uptake of DOACs was rapid and spurred an increase in new users of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2015 in Norway. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score did not change substantially during this period. Vascular disease, heart failure, and diabetes were associated with initiation of warfarin, and previous stroke, age 65-74 and female sex with initiation of DOACs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is a risk factor for cerebral venous thrombosis. The occurrence of cerebral venous thrombosis in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension raises difficult practical questions regarding the management of the 2 conditions. We reviewed our experience and the relevant literature to evaluate these related questions. Methods: We retrospectively studied the medical records and imaging studies of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension at a tertiary center from January 2007 through January 2017. The main search strategy was a literature review of journal articles in PubMed (1966 to January 2017). Results: Among 374 patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension, 4 were also diagnosed with cerebral venous thrombosis. A literature review yielded an additional 31 cases, including 21 men and 14 women with a mean age of 40.6 years. Of the 35 patients, 8 (22.8%) patients received anticoagulation therapy and epidural blood patch. Nineteen (54.3%) patients were given anticoagulant only. Seven (20%) patients were treated with epidural blood patch only. One (2.9%) patient did not receive epidural blood patch or anticoagulation therapy. There is no difference in terms of age, sex, diagnosis interval, association with other complications, and prognosis between the first 3 groups. Of the 19 patients who received anticoagulation therapy, 4 patients (21.1%) had intracranial hemorrhage or hematoma enlargement after anticoagulation, and one of these 4 patients died following further intracranial hemorrhage. Of the 8 patients who received both anticoagulation and epidural blood patch, 1 patient (12.5%, P = 0.528) developed subdural hematoma after anticoagulation. Of the 5 cases had intracranial hemorrhage aggravation after anticoagulation, 4 were subdural hematoma occurrence or enlargement. Conclusion: Cerebral venous thrombosis is a rare but important complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. The primary focus of treatment should be the treatment of intracranial hypotension. It could be possible that anticoagulation might increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension, although a firm conclusion could not be drawn based on the limited number of patients currently available. The use of anticoagulation therapy should be prudent and should be monitored carefully if initiated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but must be balanced against the associated bleeding risk. Several risk scores have been proposed for prediction of bleeding events in patients with AF.Objectives: To compare the performance of contemporary clinical bleeding risk scores in 18 113 patients with AF randomized to dabigatran 110 mg, 150 mg or warfarin in the RE-LY trial.Methods: HAS-BLED, ORBIT, ATRIA and HEMORR2 HAGES bleeding risk scores were calculated based on clinical information at baseline. All major bleeding events were centrally adjudicated.Results: There were 1182 (6.5%) major bleeding events during a median follow-up of 2.0 years. For all the four schemes, high-risk subgroups had higher risk of major bleeding (all P < 0.001). The ORBIT score showed the best discrimination with c-indices of 0.66, 0.66 and 0.62, respectively, for major, life-threatening and intracranial bleeding, which were significantly better than for the HAS-BLED score (difference in c-indices: 0.050, 0.053 and 0.048, respectively, all P < 0.05). The ORBIT score also showed the best calibration compared with previous data. Significant treatment interactions between the bleeding scores and the risk of major bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg BD versus warfarin were found for the ORBIT (P = 0.0019), ATRIA (P < 0.001) and HEMORR2 HAGES (P < 0.001) scores. HAS-BLED score showed a nonsignificant trend for interaction (P = 0.0607).Conclusions: Amongst the current clinical bleeding risk scores, the ORBIT score demonstrated the best discrimination and calibration. All the scores demonstrated, to a variable extent, an interaction with bleeding risk associated with dabigatran or warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence, clinical outcomes and antithrombotic treatment spectrum of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not been well studied in Chinese population.Methods: Twenty-six thousand five hundred ninety-two consecutive patients diagnosed with AMI were enrolled in CAMI registry from January 2013 to September 2014. After excluding 343 patients with uncertain AF status and 1,591 patients transferred out during hospitalization, 24,658 patients were finally included in this study and involved in analysis.Results: In the CAMI registry, 740 (3.0%) patients were recorded with AF prevalence during hospitalization. Higher-risk baseline clinical profile was observed in patients with AF. These patients were less likely to receive reperfusion/revascularization than those without AF. The in-hospital mortality (including death and treatment withdrawal) was significantly higher in patients with AF than that of without AF (25.2% vs. 7.2%, respectively; p < 0.01). The case of composite of adverse events was similar, which included death, treatment withdrawal, re-infarction, heart failure or stroke (42.1% vs. 16.0%, p <0.01). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, AF was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-2.78) and the composite of adverse events (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI: 1.63-2.72). Only 5.1% of patients with AF were treated with warfarin, and 1.7% were treated with both warfarin and dual antiplatelet therapy.Conclusions: The analysis was based on the CAMI registry in China. The patients hospitalized for AMI who developed AF were at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality and other adverse events. However, the anticoagulants including warfarin have been largely underused post hospital discharge.Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier: NCT01874691 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Although recommendations for the antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation (AF) are based on strong evidence, the European guidelines are not fully implemented into practice. Objectives The objective of this study is to analyse antithrombotic treatment in AF in Poland after the publication of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines in 2012. Patients and Methods We retrospectively studied 1556 patients with AF from the Reference Cardiology University Centre in Poland in 2012-2014. Results CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.5 ± 1.7 and 2.4 ± 1.1. Anti-vitamin K agent were prescribed in 59%, with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in 12%, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone in 18%. Older patients ( p < 0.0001) and with paroxysmal AF were less likely to receive oral anticoagulation (OAC, p < 0.0001). The risk of stroke according to CHA2DS2VASc score was higher in patients who did not receive OAC ( p < 0.0001). The use of OAC increased with increasing CHA2DS2VASc score but was less frequent in score ≥ 4. The risk of bleeding was higher in patients without OAC ( p < 0.0001). The odds of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants use were lower for older patients, patients with ischaemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, anaemia, HAS-BLED ≥ 3 and valvular AF. ASA was given in 39% of the patients, especially in paroxysmal AF ( p < 0.0001). The odds of ASA alone were higher for older patients, with ischaemic heart disease and history of myocardial infarction ( p < 0.0001). The odds of use of ASA as the only treatment were 5.5 times higher for HAS-BLED ≥ 3 ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions Antithrombotic management in AF is well implemented in Polish conditions, but we show the lack of pattern concerning who is being treated with OAC and ASA when it comes to the risk of stroke and bleeding. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]