Search

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist and can be challenging to treat. Pharmacologically based rhythm control of AF has not proven to be superior to rate control. Ablation-based rhythm control was compared with rate control to evaluate if clinical outcomes in patients with HF and AF could be improved. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label trial with blinded outcome evaluation using a central adjudication committee. Patients with high-burden paroxysmal (>4 episodes in 6 months) or persistent (duration Results: From December 1, 2011, to January 20, 2018, 411 patients were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control (n=214) or rate control (n=197). The primary outcome occurred in 50 (23.4%) patients in the ablation-based rhythm-control group and 64 (32.5%) patients in the rate-control group (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.49–1.03]; P =0.066). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the ablation-based group (10.1±1.2% versus 3.8±1.2%, P =0.017), 6-minute walk distance improved (44.9±9.1 m versus 27.5±9.7 m, P =0.025), and NT-proBNP demonstrated a decrease (mean change –77.1% versus –39.2%, P P =0.0036), as did the AF Effect on Quality of Life score (least-squares mean difference of 6.2 [95% CI, 1.7–10.7]; P =0.0005). Serious adverse events were observed in 50% of patients in both treatment groups. Conclusions: In patients with high-burden AF and HF, there was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality or HF events with ablation-based rhythm control versus rate control; however, there was a nonsignificant trend for improved outcomes with ablation-based rhythm control over rate control. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01420393.

Patients with hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and minimally reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain a group that presents a prognostic and therapeutic dilemma.We studied patients from our implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) database who received ICDs for hemodynamically tolerated VT and mildly reduced LVEF (36%-49%) at time of implant between May 2015 and December 2019. Time to appropriate ICD therapy was assessed. Clinical features associated with recurrent VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) with ICD therapies were explored using binary logistic regression.Among 2037 ICDs placed between May 2015 and December 2019, 64 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the study group was 68 ± 12 years, and 58 (90.6%) subjects were male. Average ejection fraction was 40% ± 4.4 (range 36%-49%). Twenty-two (34%) subjects received antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for VT at 229 ± 265 days after ICD placement. Fifteen (23%) subjects received appropriate ICD shocks 305 ± 321 days after implant. The rate of recurrent VT/VF among the 37 patients with ICD therapy was 195 ± 39 beats per minute (bpm). This was significantly more rapid than initial presenting VT rates before ICD placement (183 ± 27 bpm) (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis showed no factors independently associated with recurrent VT/VF.Patients with mildly impaired LV function and hemodynamically tolerated VT receive appropriate ICD therapies over the 3 years following implant. This patient group warrants further investigation, as their recurrent VT/VF rates can be much more rapid, and 23% go on to receive appropriate ICD shocks.

Aims: To explore possible associations that may explain the greater benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reported amongst women. Methods and results: In an individual-patient data meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials, all-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization for heart failure (HF) were compared among 794 women and 2702 men assigned to CRT or a control group. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of sex, QRS duration, HF aetiology, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and height on outcome. Women were shorter, had smaller LVEDD, more often left bundle branch block, and less often ischaemic heart disease, but QRS duration was similar between sexes. Women tended to obtain greater benefit from CRT but sex was not an independent predictor of either outcome. For all-cause mortality, QRS duration was the only independent predictor of CRT benefit. For the composite outcome, height and QRS duration, but not sex, were independent predictors of CRT benefit. Further analysis suggested increasing benefit with increasing QRS duration amongst shorter patients, of whom a great proportion were women. Conclusions: In this individual-patient data meta-analysis, CRT benefit was greater in shorter patients, which may explain reports of enhanced CRT benefit among women. Further analyses are required to determine whether recommendations on the QRS threshold for CRT should be adjusted for height. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT00170300, NCT00271154, NCT00251251).

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia among survivors of myocardial infarction with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is frequent despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The most effective approach to management of this problem is uncertain.We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ICD who had ventricular tachycardia despite the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either catheter ablation (ablation group) with continuation of baseline antiarrhythmic medications or escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy (escalated-therapy group). In the escalated-therapy group, amiodarone was initiated if another agent had been used previously. The dose of amiodarone was increased if it had been less than 300 mg per day or mexiletine was added if the dose was already at least 300 mg per day. The primary outcome was a composite of death, three or more documented episodes of ventricular tachycardia within 24 hours (ventricular tachycardia storm), or appropriate ICD shock.Of the 259 patients who were enrolled, 132 were assigned to the ablation group and 127 to the escalated-therapy group. During a mean (±SD) of 27.9±17.1 months of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 59.1% of patients in the ablation group and 68.5% of those in the escalated-therapy group (hazard ratio in the ablation group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.98; P=0.04). There was no significant between-group difference in mortality. There were two cardiac perforations and three cases of major bleeding in the ablation group and two deaths from pulmonary toxic effects and one from hepatic dysfunction in the escalated-therapy group.In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ICD who had ventricular tachycardia despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy, there was a significantly lower rate of the composite primary outcome of death, ventricular tachycardia storm, or appropriate ICD shock among patients undergoing catheter ablation than among those receiving an escalation in antiarrhythmic drug therapy. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; VANISH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00905853.).

Background The VANISH trial (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease) compared the effectiveness of escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy to catheter ablation in patients with prior myocardial infarction, an implanted defibrillator, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The effectiveness of these interventions in patients on sotalol versus amiodarone was compared. Methods and Results Analysis was conducted based on whether patients had recurrent VT, despite amiodarone (amio-refractory) or nonamiodarone drugs (sotalol-refractory). Outcomes included death, VT storm, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and any ventricular arrhythmia. At baseline, 169 (65.2%) were amio-refractory, and 90 (34.7%) were sotalol-refractory (1 patient on procainamide rather than sotalol). Amio-refractory patients had more renal insufficiency (23.7% versus 10%; P =0.0008), worse New York Heart Association class (82.3% II/III versus 65.5%; P =0.0003), and lower ejection fraction (29±9.7% versus 35.2±11%; P P =0.020). Sotalol-refractory patients had trends toward higher mortality and VT storm with ablation, with no effect on implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. Within the escalated drug therapy arm, amio-refractory patients had a higher rate of the composite outcome (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–3.29; P =0.0144) and a trend to higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–6.22; P =0.07), whereas mortality was not different between amio- and sotalol-refractory patients within the ablation treatment group. Conclusions Patients with amio-refractory VT have a higher rate of ventricular arrhythmia and mortality than those with sotalol-refractory VT and derive greater benefit of catheter ablation than for patients with sotalol-refractory VT who are switched to amiodarone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00905853.

We thank Jin-shan and Xue-bin, Kosiuk et al, and Ye et al for their interest in our study1 and for raising some important points. The intent of the SMAC-AF study (Substrate Modification with Aggressive Blood Pressure Control) was to focus on both the initiating triggers and maintaining substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) that result from hypertension, testing whether aggressive blood pressure control could modify the outcomes of catheter ablation. There are 3 potential mechanisms by which blood pressure treatment may affect the substrate involved in the maintenance of AF: (1) reduction in left ventricular diastolic pressure, leading to improved left ventricular hemodynamics, thereby decreasing atrial stretch; (2) reduction of fibrosis; and (3) effects on ion channel function.2 Chronically elevated blood pressure (BP) has been demonstrated in animal models to result in significant conduction abnormalities, shortening of atrial wavelength, and increased AF.2 Further studies demonstrated functional changes in the atrium as quickly as 15 weeks by using magnetic resonance …

Background— The RAFT (Resynchronization in Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial) demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduced both mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with functional class II or III heart failure and widened QRS. We examined the influence of CRT on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary versus secondary prophylaxis defibrillator indications. Methods and Results— All ventricular arrhythmias among RAFT study participants were downloaded and adjudicated by 2 blinded reviewers with an overreader for disagreements and committee review for remaining discrepancies. Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias among patients randomized to CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were compared within the groups of patients treated for primary prophylaxis and for secondary prophylaxis. Of 1798 enrolled patients, 1764 had data available for adjudication and were included. Of these, 1531 patients were implanted for primary prophylaxis, while 233 patients were implanted for secondary prophylaxis; 884 patients were randomized to ICD and 880 to CRT-D. During 5953.6 patient-years of follow-up, there were 11 278 appropriate ICD detections of ventricular arrhythmias. In the primary prophylaxis group, CRT-D significantly reduced incidence ventricular arrhythmias in comparison to ICD (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.99; P =0.044). This effect was not seen in the secondary prophylaxis group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–1.58; P =0.45). CRT-D was not associated with significant differences in overall ventricular arrhythmia burden in either group. Conclusions— CRT reduced the rate of onset of new ventricular arrhythmias detected by ICDs in patients without a history of prior ventricular arrhythmias. This effect was not observed among patients who had prior ventricular arrhythmias. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Current guidelines recommend cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35 %), QRS duration of ≥120–150 ms (Class IA and IB indications) on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure (HF) symptoms. Ongoing studies aim to expand the use of CRT in patients with asymptomatic or minimal symptoms left ventricular dysfunction. There have been studies that have shown benefit of CRT extended to this group of patients. There have also been different implications of the role of CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), patients with narrow QRS duration or with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on surface ECG, as well as patients with end-stage renal failure on dialysis therapy. This article aims to review the current body of evidence of expanding use of CRT in these populations.

Background Conflicting data exist regarding the association between left ventricular (LV) lead position and benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. We evaluated the relationships between LV lead positions and the risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in the cardiac resynchronization therapy arm of the R esynchronization-Defibrillation for A mbulatory Heart F ailure T rial (RAFT). Methods LV lead position was categorized by site investigator (MD) and in a chest radiograph core laboratory (CXR) as "anterior," "lateral," or "posterior" in the short axis, and "basal," "mid," or "apical" in the long axis. Agreement between MD and CXR LV lead position classification was evaluated and the independent relationship between LV lead position and clinical outcome was assessed using Cox multivariable models. Results Agreement between MD and CXR LV lead position was poor (κ ≤ 0.26). Over 39 ± 20 months, 140 of 447 (31.3%) patients met the RAFT primary end point (death or HF hospitalization). In adjusted analyses, neither MD-determined nor CXR-determined anterior or apical LV lead position was significantly associated with the primary outcome. However, CXR-defined apical LV lead position was associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.99; P = 0.004). Conclusions Poor agreement between implanting physician and core lab CXR-based categorizations of LV lead position was observed. Neither categorization method resulted in significant associations between apical or anterior LV lead position and the risk of the composite primary outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization. However, CXR-defined apical lead position was associated with increased risk of HF hospitalization.

Recent studies have provided the impetus to update the recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This article provides guidance on the implementation of CRT and is intended to serve as a framework for the implementation of CRT within the Canadian health care system and beyond. These guidelines were developed through a critical evaluation of the existing literature, and expert consensus. The panel unanimously adopted each recommendation. The 9 recommendations relate to patient selection in the presence of comorbidities, delivery and optimization of CRT, and resources required to deliver this therapy. The strength of evidence was weighed, taking full consideration of any risk of bias, and any imprecision, inconsistency, and indirectness of the available data. The strength of each recommendation and the quality of evidence were adjudicated. Trade-offs between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies were considered, as were values, preferences, and resource availability. These guidelines were externally reviewed by experts, modified based on those reviews, and will be updated as new knowledge is acquired.

Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without a defibrillator reduces morbidity and mortality in selected patients with heart failure (HF) but response can be variable. We sought to identify pre-implantation variables that predict the response to CRT in a meta-analysis using individual patient-data. Methods and results An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials, funded by Medtronic, comparing CRT either with no active device or with a defibrillator was conducted, including the following baseline variables: age, sex, New York Heart Association class, aetiology, QRS morphology, QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and systolic blood pressure. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and first hospitalization for HF or death. Of 3782 patients in sinus rhythm, median (inter-quartile range) age was 66 (58–73) years, QRS duration was 160 (146–176) ms, LVEF was 24 (20–28)%, and 78% had left bundle branch block. A multivariable model suggested that only QRS duration predicted the magnitude of the effect of CRT on outcomes. Further analysis produced estimated hazard ratios for the effect of CRT on all-cause mortality and on the composite of first hospitalization for HF or death that suggested increasing benefit with increasing QRS duration, the 95% confidence bounds excluding 1.0 at ∼140 ms for each endpoint, suggesting a high probability of substantial benefit from CRT when QRS duration exceeds this value. Conclusion QRS duration is a powerful predictor of the effects of CRT on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are in sinus rhythm. QRS morphology did not provide additional information about clinical response. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT00170300, [NCT00271154][1], [NCT00251251][2]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00271154&atom=%2Fehj%2F34%2F46%2F3547.atom [2]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00251251&atom=%2Fehj%2F34%2F46%2F3547.atom

Background A unique form of lead failure has been described in the Riata (8-F) and Riata ST (7-F) silicone defibrillation lead degradation of the outer insulation, resulting in the externalization of conductor cables. Objective To assess rates of lead revision due to lead failure in Riata leads affected by the Riata advisory. Methods Nineteen implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant and follow-up centers were surveyed. Results As of March 1, 2012, there were 5043 known affected leads implanted in Canada. Data on 4358 (86.4%) leads were obtained; 65.3% of these were Riata (8-F) and 32.4% were Riata ST (7-F) leads. The median time from implant to last follow-up was 5 years. Electrical abnormalities were reported in 4.6% of the affected leads; 8.0% of these were found to have concomitant radiographic evidence of externalization. The rate of electrical failure was higher in the 8-F (5.2%) vs 7-F (3.3%) leads ( P = .007). Oversensing with or without inappropriate shocks was reported in 39.8% of the leads with confirmed failure. Abnormally high or low impedance values (29.9%) and elevated pacing capture thresholds (43.8%) were frequently reported. One death (0.5%) attributed to lead failure was reported. Among the leads that were replaced, 21% were extracted. Two major complications (1.0%) were attributed to extraction of these leads. Conclusions The overall rate of lead failure in the Riata (8-F) and Riata ST (7-F) leads is higher than previously reported by using passive surveillance data. The impact of recent advisories related to these leads is not yet apparent.

Recent landmark trials provided the impetus to update the recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This article provides guidance on the prescription of CRT within the confines of published data. A future article will explore the implementation of these guidelines. These guidelines are intended to serve as a framework for the prescription of CRT within the Canadian health care system and beyond. They were developed through a critical evaluation of the existing literature, and expert consensus. The panel unanimously adopted each recommendation. The 8 recommendations relate to ensuring the adequacy of medical therapy before the initiation of CRT, the use of symptom severity to select candidates for CRT, differing recommendations based on the presence or absence of sinus rhythm, the presence of left bundle branch block vs other conduction patterns, and QRS duration. The use of CRT in the setting of chronic right ventricular pacing, left ventricular lead placement, and the routine assessment of dyssynchrony to guide the prescription of CRT are also included. The strength of evidence was weighed, taking full consideration of any risks of bias, as well as any imprecision, inconsistency, and indirectness of the available data. The strength of each recommendation and the quality of evidence were adjudicated. Trade-offs between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies were considered, as were values, preferences, and resource availability. These guidelines were externally reviewed by experts, modified based on those reviews, and will be updated as new knowledge is acquired.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure often coexist in patients with advanced heart failure symptoms. The result, in addition to a significant impact on quality of life, is an increase in the risk of a adverse clinical outcomes including stroke, hospitalization and overall mortality. Pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation in the heart failure population remains limited due to sub-optimal drug efficacy and a likely increased mortality due to pro-arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation ablation, since it allows for therapy without the need for toxic medication, has the potential to become mainstream treatment in patients with drug refractory, symptomatic atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Randomized studies and observational data suggest that atrial fibrillation ablation provides superior rhythm control to anti-arrhythmic drugs. Atrial fibrilla- tion ablation is relatively safe and may result in improvement of left ventricular function and quality of life. Ongoing studies are attempting to assess a number of outcome measures to help define its role in the heart failure patient population. This review focuses on atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with congestive heart failure, and summarizes the results of available literature.

Ectopic foci arising from pulmonary veins (PVs) are the predominant sources for the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a vast majority of cases. However, ectopic foci also exist in the non-PV areas like superior vena cava (SVC) in 10-20% of the cases. We report the significance of SVC isolation in a patient with persistent AF and anomalous pulmonary venous connection of the right superior pulmonary vein into the SVC.

International audience; This document was approved by the European Heart Rhythm Association, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Rhythm Society, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee, the European Association of Echocardiography of the ESC, and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC. This article is co published in HeartRhythm. The Heart Rhythm Society requests that this document be cited as follows: 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the European Heart Rhythm Association (www.escardio.org/communities/EHRA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (www.hrsonline.org). For copies of this document, please contact Sonja Olson at the Heart Rhythm Society solson@hrsonline. org. Permissions: Modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the European Heart Rhythm Association or the Heart Rhythm Society.

Up to 50% of patients do not respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular scar. Septal reverse-mismatch (R-MM) (reduced FDG uptake vs perfusion) has been observed in patients with cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS duration. We hypothesized that a greater quantity of septal R-MM would indicate a greater potential for reversibility of the cardiomyopathy, when the dyssynchrony is improved with CRT. Therefore, this study’s objective was to assess whether greater septal R-MM pattern predicts response to CRT. Forty-nine patients had pre-implant Rubidium-82 and Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Total and regional left ventricular scar size and extent of R-MM were calculated. Response to CRT was defined as ≥10% improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume or ≥5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. In the non-ischemic cardiomyopathy subset non-responders had significantly less septal R-MM than responders (13.1% compared to 27.1%, P = .012). There were correlations between the extent of septal R-MM and the increase in ejection fraction (r = 0.692, P = .0004) and reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (r = −0.579, P = .004). For each 5% absolute increase in extent of septal R-MM the odds ratio of being a responder was 2.17 (95% CI 1.15, 4.11, P = .017). Extent of septal R-MM displayed high sensitivity and specificity (area under curve = 0.855, P = .017) to predict response. In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, greater extent of septal glucose metabolic R-MM pattern, predicted response to CRT. This parameter may be useful for identifying patients who benefit from CRT.

Change of the retrograde atrial activation sequence during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of left-side accessory pathway can be due to another accessory pathway, another mechanism for the tachycardia, or due to intraatrial conduction block, partial or complete, caused by RF delivery to a site proximal to the site of insertion of the accessory pathway. In this case report, a temporary complete intraatrial conduction block was created by RF delivery proximal to the site of accessory pathway insertion, causing a change in the retrograde atrial activation sequence during ongoing tachycardia that was terminated by ablation at the insertion site of accessory pathway. (PACE 2013; 36:e23–e26)

Background Studies of cardiac resynchronization therapy in addition to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure had not been shown to reduce mortality until the recent RAFT trial (Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial). We performed a meta-analysis including the RAFT trial to determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator on mortality. Methods We searched electronic databases and other sources for reports of randomized trials using a parallel or crossover design. We included studies involving patients with heart failure receiving optimal medical therapy that compared cardiac resynchronization therapy with optimal medical therapy alone, or cardiac resynchronization therapy plus an implantable defibrillator with a standard implantable defibrillator. The primary outcome was mortality. The optimum information size was considered to assess the minimum amount of information required in the literature to reach reliable conclusions about cardiac resynchronization therapy. Results Of 3071 reports identified, 12 studies ( n = 7538) were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with optimal medical therapy alone, cardiac resynchronization therapy plus optimal medical therapy significantly reduced mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.85). Compared with an implantable defibrillator alone, cardiac resynchronization therapy plus an implantable defibrillator significantly reduced mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.96). This last finding remained significant among patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II disease (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67–0.96) but not among those with class III or IV disease (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69–1.07). Analysis of the optimum information size showed that the sequential monitoring boundary was crossed, which suggests no need for further clinical trials. Interpretation The cumulative evidence is now conclusive that the addition of cardiac resynchronization to optimal medical therapy or defibrillator therapy significantly reduces mortality among patients with heart failure.

Hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) exacerbation represents a major burden in health care and portends a poor long-term prognosis for patients. As a result, there is considerable interest to develop novel tools and strategies to better detect onset of volume overload, as HF hospitalizations may be reduced if appropriate interventions can be promptly delivered. One such innovation is the use of device-based diagnostic parameters in HF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. These diagnostic algorithms can effectively monitor and detect changes in patients' HF status, as well as predict one's risk of HF hospitalization. This paper will review the role of these device diagnostics parameters in the assessment and management of HF patients in ambulatory settings. In addition, the integration of these novel algorithms in existing HF disease management models will be discussed.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) has demonstrated reduced mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Prior studies have suggested that women may benefit more than men from CRT-D. Using a post hoc analysis of the

Background Up to 50% of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying left ventricular (LV) scar, with conflicting results. Some studies have shown that the global extent of LV scar is important, whereas others found the size of the septal or lateral wall scar to be key. Objective This study sought to examine the relative importance of the size and distribution of LV scar in determining reverse remodeling to CRT. Methods Forty-nine patients had pre-implantation rubidium-82 and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning. Total and regional LV scar size were calculated. Response to CRT was pre-specified as ≥10% improvement in LV end-systolic volume and/or ≥5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. Results Responders (n = 31) had significantly less lateral wall scar than responders (5.6% compared with 24.5%, P = .008) but a similar extent of global and septal scar. In the ischemic group, responders' median lateral wall scar size was 11.2% (IQR 0.0 to 31.2), compared with 47.8% (IQR 21.2 to 73.4) P = .052. In the ischemic group, for each 5% absolute decrease in lateral scar size, the odds ratio of being a responder was 1.87 (95% CI: 1.11 to 3.15, P = .018). In the nonischemic group, median lateral wall scar size of responders was 3.4% (IQR 0.0 to 10.3) compared with the nonresponders, 14.4% (IQR 9.0 to 27.8), P = .046. Conclusion Responders had significantly less lateral wall scar than nonresponders, but a similar extent of global and septal scar. This held true in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Background There are few data on the frequency and predictors of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TICM) in patients with persistent atrial flutter. Objectives To examine the incidence of TICM in patients undergoing ablation for persistent atrial flutter, and to examine predictors for the development of TICM. Methods and Results One hundred eleven patients met the inclusion criteria for the present study. Twenty-eight of 111 (25%) patients had cardiomyopathy before ablation. Sixteen of 28 (57%) patients showed significant improvement in their left ventricular (LV) function postablation. LV function improved to normal in 12 of 16 (75%) patients. Nineteen of 28 (68%) cardiomyopathy patients had preablation LV function in the range in which they would be considered for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. In nine of 19 (47%) patients, the ejection fraction improved such that an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was no longer indicated. In multivariate analysis, average ventricular rate during atrial flutter was the only independent predictor of reversibility of cardiomyopathy (P=0.013). Conclusions Sixteen of 28 (57%) cardiomyopathy patients with persistent atrial flutter had significantly improved LV function postablation. In 75% of these patients, LV function improved to normal.

Purpose of review This paper reviews the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on patients with heart failure symptoms, in particular, in patients with mild symptoms of heart failure. It provides the rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial to determine if CRT, when added to implantable cardioverter defibrillator, will be beneficial in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, ventricular conduction delay and mild heart failure symptoms. Recent findings CRT has been demonstrated to improve functional capacity, quality of life, and reduce heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced symptomatic heart failure, and evidence of a ventricular conduction abnormality on ECG. In patients with milder heart failure symptoms, three randomized controlled trials and observational studies failed to convincingly show improvement of functional status, but demonstrated improved ventricular reverse remodelling with more advanced heart failure patients. Summary Two large randomized clinical trials are currently ongoing (RAFT and MADIT-CRT). The results of these trials will determine the efficacy of CRT in patients with systolic heart failure, ventricular conduction abnormality and milder symptoms.

Purpose of review Heart failure and atrial fibrillation are both common cardiac conditions that share multiple risk factors. Heart failure is a risk for atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation is a risk for heart failure. The need to understand the interplay between these two cardiac conditions and the effectiveness of management options becomes increasingly relevant. Recent findings Recent studies have focused on the prognostic nature of atrial fibrillation and heart failure, the questionable utility of digoxin and beta-blocker therapy when heart failure and atrial fibrillation coexist, and the efficacy of cardiac ablation and resynchronization therapy with concomitant heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Summary The predominant questions that require further attention with respect to atrial fibrillation and heart failure are whether catheter ablation and rhythm control offers benefit in a high-risk heart failure population with respect to mortality or heart failure reduction, and whether cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation truly benefits the subgroup of candidate patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Large randomized multicentre studies are currently ongoing to address these important questions.

New EGM Morphology Discrimination for ICDs. Introduction: Wide-spread adoption of ICD therapy has focused efforts on improving the quality of life for patients by reducing "inappropriate" shock therapies. To this end, distinguishing supraventricular tachycardia from ventricular tachycardia remains a major challenge for ICDs. More sophisticated discrimination algorithms based on ventricular electrogram morphology have been made practicable by the increased computational ability of modern ICDs. Methods and Results: We report results from a large prospective study (1,122 pts) of a new ventricular electrogram morphology tachycardia discrimination algorithm (Wavelet™ Dynamic Discrimination, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) operating at minimal algorithm setting (RV coil-can electrogram, match threshold of 70%). This is a nonrandomized cohort study of ICD patients using the morphology discrimination of the Wavelet algorithm to distinguish SVT and VT/VF. The Wavelet criterion was required ON in all patients and all other supraventricular tachycardia discriminators were required to be OFF. Spontaneous episodes (N = 2,235) eligible for ICD therapy were adjudicated for detection algorithm performance. The generalized estimating equations method was used to remove bias introduced when an individual patient contributes multiple episodes. Inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia were reduced by 78% (90% CI: 72.8-82.9%) for episodes within the range of rates where Wavelet was programmed to discriminate. Sensitivity for sustained ventricular tachycardia was 98.6% (90% CI: 97-99.3%) without the use of high-rate time out. Conclusions: Results from this prospective study of the Wavelet electrogram morphology discrimination algorithm operating as the sole discriminator in the ON mode demonstrate that inappropriate therapy for supraventricular tachycardia in a single-chamber ICD can be dramatically reduced compared to rate detection alone.

Surveys of pacing practice have shown a steady increase in pacemaker implantation rates in the past 15 years, despite no major changes in United States guidelines for permanent pacing. There are no data to explain why this is occurring. In this study, records were extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey to investigate this. There were 3 major findings. First, age-adjusted implantation rates increased progressively over the study period from 370 per million in 1990 to 612 per million in 2002. Second, it was found that the escalating implantation rate is attributable to increasing implantation for isolated sinus node dysfunction (SND). Implantation for SND increased significantly over the study period (by 102%), whereas implantation for all other indications did not. The increasing implantation for SND is due primarily to the increasing prevalence of SND, with a lesser increase in implantation rate relative to prevalence rate. The third major finding of this study is that there has been a progressive relative and absolute increase in the dual-chamber implantation rate. In 2002, 82.8% of all initial pacemaker implantations were dual-chamber devices. Furthermore, the National Hospital Discharge Survey data indicate that the major randomized pacing trials seem to have had no impact on pacing practice in the United States. In conclusion, age-adjusted implantation rates increased progressively over the study period. This escalating implantation rate is primarily attributable to increasing implantation for SND.

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia and a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity, particularly stroke. The cardiac gap-junction protein connexin 40 is expressed selectively in atrial myocytes and mediates the coordinated electrical activation of the atria. We hypothesized that idiopathic atrial fibrillation has a genetic basis and that tissue-specific mutations in GJA5, the gene encoding connexin 40, may predispose the atria to fibrillation. METHODS We sequenced GJA5 from genomic DNA isolated from resected cardiac tissue and peripheral lymphocytes from 15 patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Identified GJA5 mutations were transfected into a gap-junction-deficient cell line to assess their functional effects on protein transport and intercellular electrical coupling. RESULTS Four novel heterozygous missense mutations were identified in 4 of the 15 patients. In three patients, the mutations were found in the cardiac-tissue specimens but not in the lymphocytes, indicating a somatic source of the genetic defects. In the fourth patient, the sequence variant was detected in both cardiac tissue and lymphocytes, suggesting a germ-line origin. Analysis of the expression of mutant proteins revealed impaired intracellular transport or reduced intercellular electrical coupling. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in GJA5 may predispose patients to idiopathic atrial fibrillation by impairing gap-junction assembly or electrical coupling. Our data suggest that common diseases traditionally considered to be idiopathic may have a genetic basis, with mutations confined to the diseased tissue.

Background— The relative contribution of the atrial septum and interatrial connections to biatrial activation is a fundamental concept of human cardiac electrophysiology that has yet to be fully characterized. The purpose of the present study was to determine how both atria are coupled electrically. Methods and Results— Twenty patients (16 men; mean age 54±11years) with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent simultaneous biatrial noncontact mapping before catheter ablation of AF. The multiple electrode array catheters were positioned, respectively, in the left atrium (LA; transseptally) and the right atrium (RA). In all but 2 patients, isopotential maps revealed that endocardial septal activations of the RA and LA were separate, independent, and asynchronous of each other. Interatrial conduction was related to the site of initial atrial depolarization, revealing conduction over Bachmann’s bundle in all patients during sinus rhythm, high RA pacing, and pacing from the LA appendage. Pacing from the coronary sinus was associated with conduction over the interatrial connection at the level of the coronary sinus in all patients, and conduction over Bachmann’s bundle also occurred in 5 (26%) of 19 patients. Interatrial conduction over the fossa ovalis occurred in only 2 (2%) of the 116 segments analyzed. Conclusions— Electrical coupling of the RA and LA in humans is predominantly provided by muscular connections at the level of Bachmann’s bundle and the coronary sinus. The true septum (the fossa ovalis and its limbus) of the RA and LA is asynchronous and discordant, usually without contralateral conduction during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing.

In patients with advanced heart failure, intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), multisite cardiac pacing can be proposed as an additive treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of atrioventricular pacing according to the etiology of LVSD, by comparing the outcome of patients with and without coronary artery disease. Between August 1997 and November 1998, 103 patients were included in the InSync trial and received a biventricular pacemaker and a specifically designed left ventricular pacing lead. Baseline evaluation (12 lead ECG, New York Heart Association Class, quality of life (QOL) and distance walked during the 6 min walk test) was repeated in survival patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation. Patients were split in two groups, ischemic ( N = 48) and non-ischemic ( N = 55), according the result of a recent coronary angiography, the existence of coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass or the history of a prior myocardial infarction. Results. – The mortality rate was similar in the two groups with a mean 12 months actuarial survival rate of 78%. Nevertheless, the delay between the death and the pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in the non-ischemic group. A significant reduction in QRS duration and a significant improvement in NYHA class (–1.5). QOL score (–50%) and 6 min walking test (+18%) were observed similarly in the two groups. Conclusion. – This study shows that biventricular pacing improves significantly functional status of patients with LVSD, IVCD and advanced heart failure, regardless the etiology of the cardiomyopathy, ischemic or not, without over-mortality in ischemic patients.

Biatrial pacing is a promising new therapy for drug refractory AF. This article reports two studies. First, an initial 14-patient experience with a novel technique for biatrial pacing. The authors attempted to pace from the LA vein branches of the proximal CS for LA stimulation. LA vein pacing would potentially offer the advantages of greater interatrial synchronization and possibly greater reduction in AF burden and also of lesser far-field R wave sensing and greater lead stability. Second, a postmortem series examining the number, size, and site of LA veins draining into the proximal CS is described. LA vein pacing was successful in 9 of 14 patients. LA vein electrode parameters have been stable during a median follow-up of 580 days. There were three early lead dislodgments but no other complications. In the second study, a postmortem analysis of 43 human hearts was performed. The study found that 38 (88.4%) of 43 hearts had at least one LA vein draining into the proximal 5 cm of the CS. In addition, 81.2% (33/43) had at least one vein greater than 4 Fr caliber. Thus, pacing in a greater proportion of patients might be achieved by the development and use of smaller (3, 4, and 5 Fr) electrodes. Furthermore, these smaller leads would obviously allow deeper advancement into the LA veins with the potential advantages of greater interatrial synchronization and lead stability and lesser far-field R wave sensing.

Background— The Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing (CTOPP) reported that the risk of stroke or cardiovascular death was similar between patients receiving ventricular versus physiological pacemakers at the end of the original follow-up period of 3 years. However, the occurrence of atrial fibrillation was significantly less frequent with physiological pacemakers. To assess a potential delayed benefit of physiological pacing, follow-up of patients in this study was extended to 6 years. Methods and Results— A total of 1474 patients requiring a pacemaker for symptomatic bradycardia were randomized to receive ventricular and 1094 to physiological pacemakers. The primary outcome was stroke or cardiovascular death. The study was completed in July 1998, and follow-up was extended to July 2001. At a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, there was no difference between treatment groups in the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or stroke. There was no significant difference in total mortality or stroke between groups. There was a significantly lower rate of development of atrial fibrillation in the physiological group, with a relative risk reduction of 20.1% (CI, 5.4 to 32.5; P =0.009). Conclusions— The CTOPP extended study does not show a difference in cardiovascular death or stroke, or in total mortality, or in stroke between patients implanted with ventricular or physiological pacemakers over a mean follow-up of >6 years. However, there is a persistent significant reduction in the development of atrial fibrillation with physiological pacing.

Background— Recent studies have demonstrated increased left ventricular contractility with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using atriobiventricular stimulation. This study evaluated the effect of CRT on myocardial oxidative metabolism and efficiency. Methods and Results— Eight patients with New York Heart Association functional class III-IV congestive heart failure were studied during atrial pacing (control) and atriobiventricular stimulation at the same rate. The monoexponential clearance rate of [ 11 C]acetate (k mono ) was measured with positron emission tomography to assess myocardial oxidative metabolism in the left and right ventricles (LV and RV, respectively). Myocardial efficiency was measured using the work metabolic index (WMI). Stroke volume index improved by 10% ( P =0.011) with CRT, although both global LV and RV k mono were unchanged compared with control. Septal k mono increased by 15% ( P =0.04), and the septal/lateral wall k mono ratio increased by 22% ( P =0.01). WMI increased by 13% ( P =0.024) with CRT. Conclusions— CRT improves LV function without increasing global LV oxidative metabolism, resulting in improved myocardial efficiency. Oxidative metabolism of the interventricular septum increases relative to the lateral wall, which suggests successful resynchronization.

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to estimate the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Design: Articles were identified by using a comprehensive search of English language papers indexed in Medline from 1966 to August 2001. For the outcomes of sinus rhythm and death, a random effects model was used to model repeated assessments within a study at different time points. Setting: Emergency departments and ambulatory clinics. Patients: Patients with atrial fibrillation. Interventions: Antiarrhythmic agents grouped according to their Vaughan-Williams class. Main outcome measures: Sinus rhythm and mortality. Results: 91 articles met a priori criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Median duration of follow up was one day (range 0.04–1096, mean (SD) 46 (136) days). The median proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at follow up was 55% (range 0–100%) and 32% (range 0–90%) receiving active treatment and placebo, respectively. Median survival was 99% (range 55–100%) and 99% (range 55–100%). Compared with placebo, the following drug classes were associated with increased sinus rhythm at follow up: IA (treatment difference 21.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16.3% to 26.8%); IC (treatment difference 33.1%, 95% CI 23.3% to 42.9%); and III (treatment difference 17.4%, 95% CI 11.5% to 23.3%). Class IC drugs were associated with increased sinus rhythm at follow up compared with class IV drugs (treatment difference 43.2%, 95% CI 11.5% to 75.0%). There was no significant difference in mortality between any drug classes. Conclusions: Class IA, IC, and III drugs are associated with increased sinus rhythm at follow up compared with placebo. It is unclear whether any antiarrhythmic drug class is associated with increased or decreased mortality.

Genetic studies of families with inherited cardiac rhythm disturbances have established a molecular basis for ventricular arrhythmogenic disorders. Genes responsible for the long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia have been identified. The elucidation of genetic defects responsible for more commonly occurring supraventricular rhythm disturbances have not been as forthcoming, with the exception of SCN5A mutations known to cause conduction system disease. Recently, we identified the genetic cause of a familial arrhythmogenic syndrome characterized by ventricular preexcitation and tachyarrhythmias (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome), progressive conduction system disease, and cardiac hypertrophy. The causative gene was shown to be the gamma-2 regulatory subunit (PRKAG2) of AMP-activated protein kinase. The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation of the glucose metabolic pathway in muscle suggests that genetic defects in PRKAG2 may induce a previously undescribed cardiac glycogenosis syndrome.

Circumferential lesions to the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia to cause conduction block at the junction of the PV and left atrium could offer a new approach during catheter ablation of patients with paroxysmal (focal) atrial fibrillation. Diode laser can deliver energy through diffusing or ring fiber tips. In three pigs weighing between 60 and 65 kg, transseptal puncture was performed and a fiberoptic balloon catheter with a collapsed profile of 10 Fr was advanced through a sheath under fluoroscopic guidance to the ostium of the right and left PVs. The balloon was inflated with a 3-cc mixture of D2O (deuterium oxide) and contrast to deliver circumferential lesions with a 15-mm diameter x 3-mm ring width of light. Applications consisted of 3.2 to 3.8 W/cm for 120 seconds; the animals were sacrificed 3 hours after ablation for pathological examination. Photonic energy was delivered successfully to the ostium of five of the five targeted PVs, and was well tolerated hemodynamically in each animal without ectopy. Gross inspection revealed endocardial lesions at the ostium of four of five PVs, confined to the atrium in each and circumferential in three of five PVs. Microscopically, transmural coagulation necrosis of the atrium was present at the ostium of three of five PVs, and extended into the myocardial sleeves of two PVs. Photonic energy delivery using a fiberoptic balloon catheter can create circumferential lesions to the PV ostia, suggesting that this new form of energy delivery may be therapeutically advantageous for pulmonary vein ablation with need to pursue chronic studies.

Summary Background Survival rates for cardiac arrest patients, both in and out of hospital, are poor. Results of a previous study suggest better outcomes for patients treated with vasopressin than for those given epinephrine, in the out-of-hospital setting. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness and safety of these drugs for the treatment of in-patient cardiac arrest. Methods We did a triple-blind randomised trial in the emergency departments, critical care units, and wards of three Canadian teaching hospitals. We assigned adults who had cardiac arrest and required drug therapy to receive one dose of vasopressin 40 U or epinephrine 1 mg intravenously, as the initial vasopressor. Patients who failed to respond to the study intervention were given epinephrine as a rescue medication. The primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge, survival to 1 h, and neurological function. Preplanned subgroup assessments included patients with myocardial ischaemia or infarction, initial cardiac rhythm, and age. Findings We assigned 104 patients to vasopressin and 96 to epinephrine. For patients receiving vasopressin or epinephrine survival did not differ for hospital discharge (12 [12%] vs 13 [14%], respectively; p=0·67; 95% CI for absolute increase in survival –11·8% to 7·8%) or for 1 h survival (40 [39%] vs 34 [35%]; p=0·66; –10·9% to 17·0%); survivors had closely similar median mini-mental state examination scores (36 [range 19–38] vs 35 [20–40]; p=0·75) and median cerebral performance category scores (1 vs 1). Interpretation We failed to detect any survival advantage for vasopressin over epinephrine. We cannot recommend the routine use of vasopressin for inhospital cardiac arrest patients, and disagree with American Heart Association guidelines, which recommend vasopressin as alternative therapy for cardiac arrest.

Background —A recently completed trial, the Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing (CTOPP), showed that physiological pacing did not significantly reduce mortality, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization, but it did show that atrial fibrillation occurred less frequently in patients with physiological pacing. Many pacemaker patients experience only transient bradyarrhythmias with an adequate unpaced heart rate (UHR) and are not pacemaker-dependent. The purpose of the present analysis was to determine if pacemaker-dependent patients have an increased benefit from physiological pacing compared with non–pacemaker-dependent patients. Methods and Results —Of 2568 patients included in the CTOPP trial, 2244 patients had a pacemaker dependency test performed at the first follow-up visit. The yearly event rate of cardiovascular death or stroke steadily increased with decreasing UHR in the ventricular pacing group, but it remained constant in the physiological pacing group. When the patients were subdivided to UHR ≤60 bpm or >60 bpm, there was an interaction between pacing mode treatment and UHR subgroup. The Kaplan-Meier plot confirmed a physiological pacing advantage only in the UHR ≤60 bpm subgroup. This differential effect was also present for the outcomes of cardiovascular death and total mortality. Conclusions —This study demonstrated that UHR at first follow-up has an important influence on how pacing mode selection affects cardiovascular death and total mortality. Pacemaker-dependent patients with low UHR will probably be paced frequently and will likely benefit from physiological pacing. In contrast, non–pacemaker-dependent patients will likely be paced infrequently and may not benefit from physiological pacing.

QT interval and QT dispersion both prolong early postinfarction. Non-Q wave (NQMI) and Q-wave myocardial infarction (QMI) differ in the extent of transmural necrosis, which may influence these measures of myocardial repolarization. This study compared dynamic changes in QT interval and QT dispersion early postinfarction between NQMI and QMI. In 40 patients with NQMI and 69 patients with QMI, maximum QTc (QTc(max)) and QT dispersion (QTD) were measured during the first 4 days postinfarction. Infarct size was assessed daily by using the Selvester QRS score. In both infarct types, QTc(max) and QTD were prolonged on day 1 of infarction, peaking over the next 2 days before returning toward baseline by day 4. NQMI patients had significantly longer QTc(max) and QTD by days 2 to 3 when compared with QMI patients. Multivariable linear regression identified "infarct type x QRS score" as the only independent predictor of QTc(max) (R(2) =.32, P.0001) and QTD (R(2) =.19, P.0001) on day 2. In conclusion, dynamic changes of QTc(max) and QTD occur in both infarct types. Large NQMI is associated with greater prolongation of QTc(max) and QTD, which may be due to greater M cell uncoupling and exposure when compared with QMI.

The circadian variation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was studied in 67 patients who received a dual-chamber pacemaker 3 months before a planned atrioventricular node ablation. A distinct circadian variation of AF was observed with 2 time peaks in initiation (1 in the early morning and 1 in the early evening hours), which was modulated by atrial pacing, the duration of AF, and the use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents.

Background The mortality rate among patients with coronary artery disease, abnormal ventricular function, and unsustained ventricular tachycardia is high. The usefulness of electrophysiologic testing for risk stratification in these patients is unclear. Methods We performed electrophysiologic testing in patients who had coronary artery disease, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40 percent or less, and asymptomatic, unsustained ventricular tachycardia. Patients in whom sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias could be induced were randomly assigned to receive either antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing or no antiarrhythmic therapy. The primary end point was cardiac arrest or death from arrhythmia. Patients without inducible tachyarrhythmias were followed in a registry. We compared the outcomes of 1397 patients in the registry with those of 353 patients with inducible tachyarrhythmias who were randomly assigned to receive no antiarrhythmic therapy in order to assess the prognostic...

Background Evidence suggests that physiologic pacing (dual-chamber or atrial) may be superior to single-chamber (ventricular) pacing because it is associated with lower risks of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and death. These benefits have not been evaluated in a large, randomized, controlled trial. Methods At 32 Canadian centers, patients without chronic atrial fibrillation who were scheduled for a first implantation of a pacemaker to treat symptomatic bradycardia were eligible for enrollment. We randomly assigned patients to receive either a ventricular pacemaker or a physiologic pacemaker and followed them for an average of three years. The primary outcome was stroke or death due to cardiovascular causes. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause, atrial fibrillation, and hospitalization for heart failure. Results A total of 1474 patients were randomly assigned to receive a ventricular pacemaker and 1094 to receive a physiologic pacemaker. The annual rate of stroke or death due to cardiovascular cause...

Background —Baroreceptor-mediated phasic changes in vagal tone have been hypothesized to cause ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia (VPSA). The objectives of this study were to demonstrate ventriculophasic modulation of AV nodal conduction and to substantiate the role of the baroreflex on ventriculophasic AV nodal conduction (VPAVN) by pharmacological perturbation of parasympathetic tone. Methods and Results —Twelve patients with infra-Hisian second-degree heart block and VPSA were studied. Incremental atrial pacing was performed until AV nodal Wenckebach block at baseline, after phenylephrine infusion, and after atropine. AV nodal conduction curves were constructed for each phase and compared. At baseline, VPAVN was present in 9 of 12 patients on the steep portion of the AV nodal conduction curves. Phenylephrine increased systolic blood pressure from 149±33 to 177±22 mm Hg ( P P Conclusions —VPAVN was demonstrated in patients with infra-Hisian second-degree AV block. It was accentuated by phenylephrine and abolished by atropine, suggesting a baroreflex mechanism for VPSA and VPAVN.

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is an infrequent complication of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and operator-dependent factors associated with AEF using a nationwide survey of electrophysiologists (EP). Thirty-eight EPs performing AF ablation between 2008 and 2012 were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire assessing the prevalence and factors associated with AEF. Responses were obtained from 25 EPs (68 %) accounting for 7,016 AF ablations. Five cases of proven AEF (0.07 %) were reported. Operators who reported AEF [AEF (+)] more often used general anesthesia (GA) [90 % AEF (+) vs. 44 % AEF (−), p = 0.046]. AEF (+) operators were also more likely to be users of the non-brushing technique in the posterior wall of the LA [5 (100 %) AEF (+) vs. 5 (25 %) AEF (−), p = 0.005]. The combined usage of GA and non-brushing technique during LA posterior wall ablation had a strong association with AEF (+) operators [4 (80 %) AEF (+) vs. 2 (10 %) AEF (−), p = 0.002]. There was a trend towards higher maximal RF energy setting in the posterior wall [47.4 + 7.6 AEF (+) vs. 40.2 + 8 AEF (−), p = 0.09]. Other procedure parameters were similar. The reported prevalence of AEF among Canadian AF ablators is 0.07 %. AEF was associated with high mortality. The use of GA and non-brushing movements during posterior wall ablation were two factors associated with AEF.

We appreciate Drs Gasparini and Boriani’s letter1 and their work to clarify the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. However, we feel that the conclusions they make are far too definitive, considering that they are based entirely on observational data. The majority of patients in Ganesan et al’s2 meta-analysis did not have atrioventricular (AV) node ablation; thus, important biases may have influenced the decision to undertake this intervention, which might also have been associated with a more favorable outcome. Indeed, Ganesan et al’s2 own conclusion was that AV nodal ablation is “worthy of investigation in a randomized controlled trial.” Far too often in cardiology has there …