Search

Background and Objectives The adrenergic drug ephedrine inhibits Na + current in cultured cells expressing Na + channels and provides dose-dependent reversible rat sciatic nerve blockade. The dosage required for peripheral nerve blockade in humans would cause unacceptable cardiovascular side effects. We therefore hypothesized that either lidocaine or bupivacaine would show synergy with ephedrine in a rat sciatic nerve block model, allowing a dose reduction and limiting side effects while improving efficacy. Methods Sciatic nerves of anesthetized rats were exposed by lateral incision of the thighs; 0.2 mL of different concentrations of the following drugs was injected subfascially: bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ephedrine alone and bupivacaine or lidocaine combined with ephedrine (n = 8 per group). After animals recovered from anesthesia, a blinded investigator evaluated motor blockade (push against a balance) and sensory/nociceptive blockade (to pinch of the fifth toe) at predefined time intervals. Results Ephedrine combined with bupivacaine interacted additively for both motor and sensory blockade, and ephedrine combined with lidocaine interacted antagonistically (subadditive) for sensory blockade and additively for motor blockade. Conclusions A combination of ephedrine with either lidocaine or bupivacaine is unlikely to allow a significant dose reduction because of a lack of synergy. Furthermore, the cardiovascular side effects will limit the maximal tolerable dosage of ephedrine.

Background The sympathomimetic drug ephedrine has been used intrathecally as the sole local anesthetic for labor and delivery. Because ephedrine may be a useful adjuvant to local anesthetics, the authors investigated the local anesthetic properties of ephedrine in a rat sciatic nerve block model and the underlying mechanism in cultured cells stably expressing Na channels. Methods After approval of the animal protocol, the sciatic nerves of anesthetized rats were exposed by lateral incision of the thighs, 0.2 ml ephedrine at 0.25, 1, 2.5, or 5% and/or bupivacaine at 0.125% was injected, and the wound was closed. Motor and sensory/nociceptive functions were evaluated by the force achieved by pushing against a balance and the reaction to pinch, respectively. The whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique was used to record Na currents from human embryonal kidney cells stably transfected with Nav1.4 channels. Results The nociception blockade was significantly longer than the motor blockade at test doses of 2.5 and 5% of ephedrine, or when 1% ephedrine was combined with 0.125% bupivacaine (analysis of variance with repeated measures, P < 0.001, n = 8/group). In vitro, the 50% inhibitory concentrations of ephedrine at -150 and -60 mV were 1,043 +/- 70 and 473 +/- 13 mum, respectively. High-frequency stimulation revealed a use-dependent block of 18%, similar to most local anesthetics. Conclusions Because ephedrine's properties are at least partly due to Na channel blockade, detailed histopathologic investigations are justified to determine the potential of ephedrine as an adjuvant to clinically used local anesthetics.

Background The antidepressant amitriptyline is used as an adjuvant in the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Among its many actions, this drug also blocks ion channels, such as Na channels. Preliminary animal studies suggested that amitripty-line would be a longer-lasting local anesthetic than bupivacaine, with potentially fewer side effects. Therefore, the authors investigated the adverse effects and effectiveness of this drug when given for ulnar nerve blockade in human volunteers. Methods After obtaining written institutional review board approval and informed consent, a typical phase Ia trial was conducted by administration to the ulnar nerve at the level of the wrist in an open-label, dose-escalating fashion. Amitripty-line hydrochloride, 4 ml, at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mM (n = 4-9/group) was used for each volunteer. If no major side effects and nerve block were encountered, comparison in a randomized, double-blinded trial of amitriptyline (20 mM) to placebo and bupivacaine (4 mM) (n = 4-9/group), was to follow. A blunt needle was used to grade the pain, and motor blockade was assessed by the Froment test. Results There was no significant statistical difference in terms of side effects (pain, swelling, erythema, and sedation) among any groups. The analgesic effects of 20 mM amitriptyline and 4 mm bupivacaine solution were significantly higher than those of the placebo solution. Conclusions Because of the lack of evidence that amitripty-line provides better nerve blockade than current local anesthetics and the potential for neurotoxicity, its use for peripheral nerve blockade in humans seems limited.

The tricyclic antidepressant, doxepin, has been reported to be a potent local anesthetic in rat sciatic nerve blockade. We hypothesized that topical doxepin has significantly longer antinociception compared with control and intrathecally compared with bupivacaine. Solutions of 0.3 mL of doxepin at 50, 75, and 100 mM and control (only the vehicle solution) were applied as a patch to the shaved dorsal skin of rats. After a 2-h contact interval, the patch was removed, and the rats were tested by three sets of six pinpricks. Inhibition of withdrawal to pain and cutaneous trunci muscle reflex were graded. In the second investigation, 60 muL of doxepin at 10, 20, and 50 mM was injected through intrathecal catheters implanted in the lumbar region of rats, which were evaluated for motor function, proprioception, and nociception. Topical doxepin at concentrations of 75 mM and 100 mM was significantly more effective than control (P < 0.05). Complete recovery for the 100-mM concentration occurred at 60 h, although two of five rats demonstrated erythema and scarring. Intrathecally, 20 mM of doxepin was not significantly different for motor and proprioceptive function from 23 mM (0.75%) bupivacaine; however, neurotoxicity (defined as persistent neurological deficit) commenced at 50 mM.

Background and Objectives The propyl group of ropivacaine ( N -propyl-2′,6′-pipecoloxylidide hydrochloride) could be responsible for conferring some sensory selectivity to this drug. Thus, adding a propyl group to experimental local anesthetics (LAs) (e.g., the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline and doxepin) to increase sensory selectivity may be useful. We, therefore, synthesized N -propyl amitriptyline and N -propyl doxepin and investigated a potential predominance of sensory/nociceptive block over motor block (differential block) in a rat sciatic nerve block model. In addition, tetrodotoxin (TTX), a naturally occuring Na + channel blocker, was coinjected to investigate whether it increased block duration. Methods A 0.2-mL test dose of N -propyl amitriptyline and N -propyl doxepin, at a concentration of 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM, (alone or in combination with TTX at a concentration of 20 μM) was injected by the subfascial sciatic nerve approach. Motor function and sensory function (nociception) were evaluated by the force a rat’s hind limb produced when pushing against a balance and the reaction to pinch, respectively. Results N -propyl amitriptyline and N -propyl doxepin demonstrated prolonged block duration, with N -propyl amitriptyline displaying significant differential block at higher concentrations (5 and 10 mM). The combination of either of these drugs with TTX increased the potency as well as the efficacy. Neurotoxicity commenced at concentrations of 5 to 10 mM. Conclusions Detailed histopathologic nerve toxicity evaluations are justified to determine whether N -propyl amitriptyline has potential as a more sensory-selective local anesthetic at lower concentrations or as a predominantly sensory-selective neurolytic agent at higher concentrations.

The antidepressant amitriptyline is used as an adjuvant in the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Among its many actions, this drug also blocks ion channels, such as Na channels. Preliminary animal studies suggested that amitripty-line would be a longer-lasting local anesthetic than bupivacaine, with potentially fewer side effects. Therefore, the authors investigated the adverse effects and effectiveness of this drug when given for ulnar nerve blockade in human volunteers.After obtaining written institutional review board approval and informed consent, a typical phase Ia trial was conducted by administration to the ulnar nerve at the level of the wrist in an open-label, dose-escalating fashion. Amitripty-line hydrochloride, 4 ml, at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mM (n = 4-9/group) was used for each volunteer. If no major side effects and nerve block were encountered, comparison in a randomized, double-blinded trial of amitriptyline (20 mM) to placebo and bupivacaine (4 mM) (n = 4-9/group), was to follow. A blunt needle was used to grade the pain, and motor blockade was assessed by the Froment test.There was no significant statistical difference in terms of side effects (pain, swelling, erythema, and sedation) among any groups. The analgesic effects of 20 mM amitriptyline and 4 mm bupivacaine solution were significantly higher than those of the placebo solution.Because of the lack of evidence that amitripty-line provides better nerve blockade than current local anesthetics and the potential for neurotoxicity, its use for peripheral nerve blockade in humans seems limited.