Search

Background: Prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with higher mortality and increased patient complications;conventional physician-directedweaningmethods are highly variable and permit significant time that weaning is inefficient and ineffective Objectives: The primary objective of this quality improvement project was to implement a registered nurse (RN)-- and respiratory therapist (RT)-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care academic medical center Methods: This quality improvement project used a quasi-experimental design with a retrospective usual care group who underwent physician-directed (conventional) weaning (n = 51) and a prospective intervention group who underwent protocol-directed weaning (n = 54) Outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, reintubation rates, and RN and RT satisfaction with the weaning protocol Results: Patients in the RN- and RT-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol group had significantly lower duration of mechanical ventilation (74 vs 152 hours;P = 002) and ICU length of stay (6 7 vs 10 2 days;P = 031) There was no significant difference in reintubation rates between groups Staff surveys indicate that both RN and RTs were satisfied with the process change Discussion: Implementation of a multidisciplinary mechanical ventilation weaning protocol is a safe and effectiveway to improve patient outcomes and empower ICU staff [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )

RATIONALE:Secondary infections with bacterial pathogens are thought to be responsible for poor outcomes in the 1918 Spanish and H1N1 pandemics. We postulate that poor prognosis in patients with SARS-CoV2 may be associated with uncontrollable viral replication, co-infection with a secondary pathogen, and over exuberant host immune response. We seek to evaluate whether there is an association between distinct features of the lower airway microbiota and poor clinical outcome in patients with SARS-CoV2. METHODS:We collected lower airway samples in 148 patients from NYU admitted between 3/10/2020 and 5/10/2020 with severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and that underwent bronchoscopy for airway clearance and/or tracheostomy. Clinical outcome was defined as dead vs alive. DNA was isolated in parallel using zymoBIOMICS™ DNA/RNA Miniprep Kit (Cat: R2002) as per manufacturer's instructions. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene marker was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. Sequences were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME version 1.9.1) pipeline. Total bacterial load was evaluated in lower airway samples using digital droplet PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. RESULTS:Of the 148 patients included, 114 survived (77%) and 34 (23%) died. Among those with poor clinical outcome, there was a non-statistically significant trend towards higher age and BMI. Patients who died more commonly had chronic kidney disease and prior cerebrovascular accidents, and more often required dialysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of positive bacterial respiratory or blood cultures among those that survived vs. those that died (75 vs. 73% and 43 vs 38%, respectively). Topographical analysis of the 16S RNA microbiome shows compositional differences between the upper and lower airways based on β diversity comparisons. When comparing across clinical outcomes, the α diversity was lower in the dead group but there was no statistically significant difference in overall community composition (β diversity). Taxonomic differential enrichment analysis using DESeq analysis showed that oral commensals were enriched in the group that survived. Patients that died had a higher bacterial load in their lower airways than those who survived. CONCLUSION:Using samples obtained via bronchoscopy we identified lower airway microbiota signatures associated with mortality among critical patients infected with SARS-CoV2. Taxonomic signals identified as associated with poor prognosis did not reveal bacterial taxa commonly classified as respiratory pathogens. This data is not supportive of the hypothesis that secondary untreated bacterial co-infections are responsible for increased mortality in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2.

Mortality among patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure is high and there are no known lower airway biomarkers that predict clinical outcome. We investigated whether bacterial respiratory infections and viral load were associated with poor clinical outcome and host immune tone. We obtained bacterial and fungal culture data from 589 critically ill subjects with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. On a subset of the subjects that underwent bronchoscopy, we also quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, analyzed the microbiome of the lower airways by metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses and profiled the host immune response. We found that isolation of a hospital-acquired respiratory pathogen was not associated with fatal outcome. However, poor clinical outcome was associated with enrichment of the lower airway microbiota with an oral commensal (Mycoplasma salivarium), while high SARS-CoV-2 viral burden, poor anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, together with a unique host transcriptome profile of the lower airways were most predictive of mortality. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that 1) the extent of viral infectivity drives mortality in severe COVID-19, and therefore 2) clinical management strategies targeting viral replication and host responses to SARS-CoV-2 should be prioritized.

Interruptions in continuous nebulized pulmonary vasodilators, such as epoprostenol, can potentially result in clinical deterioration in respiratory status. Coadministration of other intermittent nebulized therapies may require opening the ventilator circuit to facilitate administration. However, in patients with SARS-CoV2 infection, it is preferred to avoid opening the circuit whenever feasible to prevent aerosolization of the virus and exposure of health care workers. In this study, we describe a unique method of administering continuous epoprostenol nebulization and intermittent nebulized antibiotics, mucolytics, and bronchodilators, using Aerogen vibrating mesh nebulizers without interruptions in epoprostenol or opening the ventilator circuit. This technique set up consisted of stacking two Aerogen nebulizer cups, each with its own controller. This approach was successful in allowing concomitant delivery of intermittent and continuous nebulized therapy without interruptions. To our knowledge, this method has not been previously described in the literature and may be helpful to bedside clinicians facing a similar clinical scenario.

Background Familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome, hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathy type-III) is a rare genetic disease caused by impaired development of sensory and afferent autonomic nerves. As a consequence, patients develop neurogenic dysphagia with frequent aspiration, chronic lung disease, and chemoreflex failure leading to severe sleep disordered breathing. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory disorders in familial dysautonomia. Methods We performed a systematic review to summarize the evidence related to our questions. When evidence was not sufficient, we used data from the New York University Familial Dysautonomia Patient Registry, a database containing ongoing prospective comprehensive clinical data from 670 cases. The evidence was summarized and discussed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts. Evidence-based and expert recommendations were then formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results Recommendations were formulated for or against specific diagnostic tests and clinical interventions. Diagnostic tests reviewed included radiological evaluation, dysphagia evaluation, gastroesophageal evaluation, bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, pulmonary function tests, laryngoscopy and polysomnography. Clinical interventions and therapies reviewed included prevention and management of aspiration, airway mucus clearance and chest physical therapy, viral respiratory infections, precautions during high altitude or air-flight travel, non-invasive ventilation during sleep, antibiotic therapy, steroid therapy, oxygen therapy, gastrostomy tube placement, Nissen fundoplication surgery, scoliosis surgery, tracheostomy and lung lobectomy. Conclusions Expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management of respiratory disease in patients with familial dysautonomia are provided. Frequent reassessment and updating will be needed.