Search

The hormone and neuropeptide arginine-vasopressin is designated to the maintenance of osmotic homoeostasis and blood pressure regulation. While experimental data show vasopressin V(1A) receptors to regulate aquaporin (AQP)4 water channel dependent brain water movement, the specific role in vasogenic and cytotoxic edema formation remains unclear. The present study was designed to quantify the V(1A) receptor mediated regional brain edema formation in two clinically relevant experimental models, brain injury combined with secondary insult and focal ischemia.Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a continuous infusion of vehicle (1 % DMSO) or the selective non-peptide V(1A) antagonist SR49059 (83nM = 1 mg/kg) starting before controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury plus hypoxia and hypotension (HH, 30 min), or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion (2 h + 2 h reperfusion).A global analysis of brain water content by the wet/dry weight method allowed optimizing the SR49059 dosage, and demonstrated the down-regulation of brain AQP4 expression by immunoblotting. Microgravimetrical quantification in 64 one mm(3) samples per animal (n = 6 per group) from bregma +2.7 to -6.3 mm analysis demonstrated brain edema to be reduced at 4 h by SR49059 treatment in the injured and contralateral cortex following CCI + HH (p = 0.007, p 0.001) and in the infarct area following MCA occlusion (p = 0.013, p = 0.002, p = 0.004).Our findings demonstrate that an early cytotoxic brain edema component following brain injury plus secondary insult or focal ischemia results from a vasopressin V(1A) receptor mediated response, and occurs most likely through AQP4 up-regulation. The V(1A) antagonist SR49059 offers a new avenue in brain edema treatment and prompts further study into the role of vasopressin following brain injury.

This study extends our previous investigation regarding the effect of nondifferential dichotomous Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) misclassification in traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical trials to the effect of GOS misclassification on ordinal analysis in TBI clinical trials. The impact of GOS misclassification and ordinal outcome analysis was explored via probabilistic sensitivity analyses using TBI patient datasets from the IMPACT database (n = 9205). Three patterns of misclassification were explored given the pre-specified misclassification distributions. For the random pattern, we specified a trapezoidal distribution (minimum: 80%, mode: 85%, and 95%, maximum: 100%) for both sensitivity and specificity; for the upward pattern, the same trapezoidal distribution for sensitivity but with a perfect specificity; and for the downward pattern, the same trapezoidal distribution for specificity but with a perfect sensitivity. The conventional 95% confidence intervals and simulation intervals, which accounts for the misclassification and random errors together, were reported. The results showed that given the specified misclassification distributions, the misclassification with a random or upward pattern would have caused a slightly underestimated outcome in the observed data. However, the misclassification with a downward pattern would have resulted in an inflated estimation. Thus the sensitivity analysis suggests that the nondifferential misclassification can cause uncertainties on the primary outcome estimation in TBI trials. However, such an effect is likely to be small when ordinal analysis is applied, compared with the impact of dichotomous GOS misclassifications. The result underlines that the ordinal GOS analysis may gain from both statistical efficiency, as suggested by several recent studies, and a relatively smaller impact from misclassification as compared with conventional binary GOS analysis.

Background and Purpose— Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and intraventricular hemorrhage have a reported mortality of 50% to 80%. We evaluated a clot lytic treatment strategy for these patients in terms of mortality, ventricular infection, and bleeding safety events, and for its effect on the rate of intraventricular clot lysis. Methods— Forty-eight patients were enrolled at 14 centers and randomized to treatment with 3 mg recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) or placebo. Demographic characteristics, severity factors, safety outcomes (mortality, infection, bleeding), and clot resolution rates were compared in the 2 groups. Results— Severity factors, including admission Glasgow Coma Scale, intracerebral hemorrhage volume, intraventricular hemorrhage volume, and blood pressure were evenly distributed, as were adverse events, except for an increased frequency of respiratory system events in the placebo-treated group. Neither intracranial pressure nor cerebral perfusion pressure differed substantially between treatment groups on presentation, with external ventricular device closure, or during the active treatment phase. Frequency of death and ventriculitis was substantially lower than expected and bleeding events remained below the prespecified threshold for mortality (18% rtPA; 23% placebo), ventriculitis (8% rtPA; 9% placebo), symptomatic bleeding (23% rtPA; 5% placebo, which approached statistical significance; P =0.1). The median duration of dosing was 7.5 days for rtPA and 12 days for placebo. There was a significant beneficial effect of rtPA on rate of clot resolution. Conclusions— Low-dose rtPA for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage has an acceptable safety profile compared to placebo and historical controls. Data from a well-designed phase III clinical trial, such as CLEAR III, will be needed to fully evaluate this treatment. Clinical Trial Registration— Participant enrollment began before July 1, 2005.

BACKGROUND: Differences between centers in patient outcome after traumatic brain injury are of importance for multicenter studies and have seldom been studied. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the differences in centers enrolling patients in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and surveys. METHODS: We analyzed individual patient data from 9578 patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury enrolled in 10 RCTs and 3 observational studies. We used random-effects logistic regression models to estimate the between-center differences in unfavorable outcome (dead, vegetative state, or severe disability measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale) at 6 months adjusted for differences in patient characteristics. We calculated the difference in odds of unfavorable outcome between the centers at the higher end vs those at the lower end of the outcome distribution. We analyzed the total database, Europe and the United States separately, and 4 larger RCTs. RESULTS: The 9578 patients were enrolled at 265 centers, and 4629 (48%) had an unfavorable outcome. After adjustment for patient characteristics, there was a 3.3-fold difference in the odds of unfavorable outcome between the centers at the lower end of the outcome distribution (2.5th percentile) vs those at the higher end of the outcome distribution (97.5th percentile; P < .001). In the 4 larger RCTs, the differences between centers were similar. However, differences were smaller between centers in the United States (2.4-fold) than between centers in Europe (3.8-fold). CONCLUSION: Outcome after traumatic brain injury differs substantially between centers, particularly in Europe. Further research is needed to study explanations for these differences to suggest where quality of care might be improved.

Object There are several infusion methods available to estimate the outflow conductance (Cout) or outflow resistance (Rout = 1/Cout) of the CSF system. It has been stated that for unknown reasons, the bolus infusion method estimates a higher Cout than steady-state infusion methods. The aim of this study was to compare different infusion methods for estimation of Cout. Methods The following 3 different infusion methods were used: the bolus infusion method (Cout bol); the constant flow infusion method, both static (Cout stat) and dynamic (Cout dyn) analyses; and the constant pressure infusion method (Cout cpi). Repeated investigations were performed on an experimental model with well-known characteristics, with and without physiological pressure variations (B-waves, breathing, and so on). All 3 methods were also performed in a randomized order during the same investigation in 20 patients with probable or possible idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus; 6 of these patients had a shunt and 14 did not. Results Without the presence of physiological pressure variations, the concordance in the experimental model was good between all methods. When they were added, the repeatability was better for the steady-state methods and a significantly higher Cout was found with the bolus method in the region of clinically relevant Cout (p < 0.05). The visual fit for the bolus infusion was dependent on subjective assessment by the operator. This experimental finding was confirmed by the clinical results, where significant differences were found in the investigations in patients without shunts between Cout of the visual bolus method and Cout stat, Cout dyn, and Cout cpi (4.58, 4.18, and 6.12 μl/[second × kPa], respectively). Conclusions This study emphasized the necessity for standardization of Cout measurements. An experienced operator could partly compensate for difficulties in correctly estimating the pressure parameters for the bolus infusion method, but for the general user this study suggests a steady-state method for estimating Cout.

Background Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury have a disappointing track record, with a long history of ‘negative’ Phase III trials. One contributor to this lack of success is almost certainly the low efficiency of the conventional approach to the analysis, which discards information by dichotomizing an ordinal outcome scale. Purpose Our goal was to evaluate the potential efficiency gains, which can be achieved by using techniques, which extract additional information from ordinal outcome data — the proportional odds model and the sliding dichotomy. In addition, we evaluated the additional efficiency gains, which can be achieved through covariate adjustment. Methods The study was based on simulations, which were built around a database of patient-level data extracted from eight Phase III trials and three observational studies in traumatic brain injury. Two different putative treatment effects were explored, one which followed the proportional odds model, and the other which assumed that the effect of the intervention was to reduce the risk of death without changing the distribution of outcomes within survivors. The results are expressed as efficiency gains, reported as the percentage reduction in sample size that can be used with the ordinal analyses without loss of statistical power relative to the conventional binary analysis. Results The simulation results show substantial efficiency gains. Use of the sliding dichotomy allows sample sizes to be reduced by up to 40% without loss of statistical power. The proportional odds model gives modest additional gains over and above the gains achieved by use of the sliding dichotomy. Limitations As with any simulation study, it is difficult to know how far the findings may be extrapolated beyond the actual situations that were modeled. Conclusions Both ordinal techniques offer substantial efficiency gains relative to the conventional binary analysis. The choice between the two techniques involves subtle value judgments. In the situations examined, the proportional odds model gave efficiency gains over and above the sliding dichotomy, but arguably, the sliding dichotomy is more intuitive and clinically appealing. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: 44—57. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Substantial heterogeneity exists among patients who suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Strict enrollment criteria may diminish heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but will also decrease recruitment and may affect the outcome distribution. The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of commonly used enrollment criteria for RCTs in TBI on potential recruitment and on outcome distribution. We used individual patient data from the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) database, including six therapeutic phase III RCTs (n-5816) and three surveys (n-2217) in TBI. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months after injury, which we dichotomized as favorable/unfavorable. We investigated the influences of commonly used enrollment criteria on recruitment and outcome distribution: time window between injury and admission to study hospital = 1 reactive pupil; motor score > 1; Glasgow Coma Scale

SUMMARY A practical intracranial pressure telemeter has been designed and tested for long-term dynamic and static measurement of absolute intracranial pressure. Paraffin coating created stability without affecting sensitivity or dynamic qualities. The range of detection is promising for human intracranial implantation and the long-term evaluation of hydrocephalus managed by means of pressure-dependent valve-regulated shunts. RESUME Ln telemetre pratique de la pression intracranienne a ete mis au point et teste pour les mesures a long terme dynamiques et statiques de la pression intracranienne absolue. Un revetement de parafine assure la stabilite sans nuire a la sensibilite ou aux qualites dynamiques. L'etendue de la detection est encourageante pour l'implatation intracranienne chez l'homme et revaluation a long terme de l'hydrocephalie traitee au moyen de shunts regularises par valve dependant de la pression. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Ein praktischer, intrakranieller Druck-Telemeter ist entworfen und fur langfristige, aktive und statische Messung des absoluten, intrakraniellen Druckes getestet worden. Ein Paraffinuberzug tragt zur Stabilitat bei, ohne jedoch die Reaktionsfahigkeit der aktiven Qualitaten zu beeintrachtigen. Der Umfang der Ermittlung sieht vielversprechend aus fur menschliche intrakranielle Implantation und der langfristigen Bewertung von Hydrocephalus, der durch druckabhangige, ventilregulierte Shunts behandelt wird. RESUMEN Se ha construido y probado un telemetro practico para medir la presion intracraneal. Se lo ha utilizado a largo plazo para la medicion dinamica y estatica de la presion intracraneal absoluta. Un revestimiento de parafina aseguraba la estabilidad sin afectar la sensitividad ni las calidades dinamicas. El campo extenso de eficacia promete mucho para la implantacion intracraneal humana, y para la valoracion a largo plazo de la hidrocefalia controlada por medio de shunts regulados por valvulas dependientes de presion.

SUMMARY Intraventricular pressure in infants with progressive hydrocephalus was found to be within the normal range while the infants were resting, but wide fluctuations in pressure occurred during periods of activity such as sucking, crying or straining. Thus, evidence of normal ventricular pressure does not exclude the possibility of progressive hydrocephalus, and increased pressure is likely to occur for quite long periods while the hydrocephalic infant is engaged in normal infantile activities. A pressure-volume index is discussed, by which it is hoped to quantify rates of CSF formation and absorption in a less complex manner than is possible by the perfusion technique. RESUME Considerations sur le rapport pression-volume dans l'hydrocephalic infantile La pression intraventriculaire chez le nourrisson avec hydrocephalic progressive a ete trouvee dans les limites du normal lorsque les nourrissons etaient au repos, mais de larges fluctuations de pression ont ete relevees durant les periodes d'activite comme la succion, les pleurs ou les efforts. Ainsi, l'existence d'une pression ventriculaire normale ne doit pas faire exclure la possibilite d'une hydrocephalic progressive et une pression augmentee doit etre considered comme probable durant de longues periodes, lorsque l'enfant hydrocephale est au cours d'activites infantiles normales. Un index pression-volume est discute, par lequel les auteurs esperent quantifier les taux de formation et d'absorption du LCR d'une maniere plus simple qu'il n'est possible avec les techniques de perfusion. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Druck-Volumen-Betrachtungen beim kindlichen Hydrocephalus Bei Kindern mit progressivem Hydrocephalus fanden sich in Ruhe intraventrikulare Druckverhaltnisse im Normbereich, wahrend in Zeiten der Aktivitat, wie Trinken, Schreien oder Strampeln, grose Druckschwankungen auftraten. Somit schliest ein normaler Ventrikeldruck die Moglichkeit eines progressiven Hydrocephalus nicht aus und ein erhohter Druck ist fur recht lange Perioden zu erwarten, wenn das Kind mit Hydrocephalus die normale Aktivitat des Sauglings entfaltet. Es wird ein Druck-Volumen-Index diskutiert, mit dessen Hilfe man hoffentlich die CSF Bildung und -Absorption in einer weniger umfassenden Weise als mit der Perfusionstechnik quantitativ erfassen kann.

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is the primary endpoint for efficacy analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Accurate and consistent assessment of outcome after TBI is essential to the evaluation of treatment results, particularly in the context of multicenter studies and trials. The inconsistent measurement or interobserver variation on GOS outcome, or for that matter, on any outcome scales, may adversely affect the sensitivity to detect treatment effects in clinical trial. The objective of this study is to examine effects of nondifferential misclassification of the widely used five-category GOS outcome scale and in particular to assess the impact of this misclassification on detecting a treatment effect and statistical power. We followed two approaches. First, outcome differences were analyzed before and after correction for misclassification using a dataset of 860 patients with severe brain injury randomly sampled from two TBI trials with known differences in outcome. Second, the effects of misclassification on outcome distribution and statistical power were analyzed in simulation studies on a hypothetical 800-patient dataset. Three potential patterns of nondifferential misclassification (random, upward and downward) on the dichotomous GOS outcome were analyzed, and the power of finding treatments differences was investigated in detail. All three patterns of misclassification reduce the power of detecting the true treatment effect and therefore lead to a reduced estimation of the true efficacy. The magnitude of such influence not only depends on the size of the misclassification, but also on the magnitude of the treatment effect. In conclusion, nondifferential misclassification directly reduces the power of finding the true treatment effect. An awareness of this procedural error and methods to reduce misclassification should be incorporated in TBI clinical trials.

Object Brain edema resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or ischemia if uncontrolled exhausts volume reserve and leads to raised intracranial pressure and brain herniation. The basic types of edema—vasogenic and cytotoxic—were classified 50 years ago, and their definitions remain intact. Methods In this paper the author provides a review of progress over the past several decades in understanding the pathophysiology of the edematous process and the success and failures of treatment. Recent progress focused on those manuscripts that were published within the past 5 years. Results Perhaps the most exciting new findings that speak to both the control of production and resolution of edema in both trauma and ischemia are the recent studies that have focused on the newly described “water channels” or aquaporins. Other important findings relate to the predominance of cellular edema in TBI. Conclusions Significant new findings have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of brain edema; however, less progress has been made in treatment. Aquaporin water channels offer hope for modulating and abating the devastating effects of fulminating brain edema in trauma and stroke.

Object The primary objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), both diagnosed and undiagnosed, among residents of assisted-living and extended-care facilities, by using a practical screening tool. A secondary objective was to evaluate prospectively the diagnosis and outcome of surgical treatment in a subset of patients residing in healthcare facilities who were at risk for idiopathic NPH. Methods A retrospective chart analysis was performed using the medical records from four nursing homes. The final analysis included 147 patient records. Symptomatology and comorbidity were evaluated, as was the ability to perform activities of daily living. In a subset of 17 patients residing in healthcare facilities, the authors applied a standard idiopathic NPH diagnostic and management protocol and followed up the patients 1 year after treatment. The estimated incidence of suspected idiopathic NPH among all patients in the retrospective survey ranged from 9 to 14%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used. Among the cohort of 17 patients available for an in-hospital study and 1-year follow up, 11 received shunts and seven of these showed either transient or sustained improvement. Conclusions A valid and practical diagnostic method is needed to identify idiopathic NPH accurately before admitting patients to a healthcare facility. Data from a prospective study of 17 patients residing in healthcare facilities indicated that supplementary tests remain predictive of a positive response to shunt insertion but cannot predict whether a favorable outcome will be sustained in a population of patients who have been confined to a wheelchair for a prolonged period of time. This finding supports the notion of a finite window of opportunity for successful treatment of idiopathic NPH and the imperativeness of an early diagnosis.

Computerized tomography (CT) scanning provides an objective assessment of the structural damage to the brain following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to describe and quantify the relationship between CT characteristics and 6-month outcome, assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Individual patient data from the IMPACT database were available on CT classification (N = 5209), status of basal cisterns ( N = 3861), shift ( N = 4698), traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) ( N = 7407), and intracranial lesions ( N = 7613). We used binary logistic and proportional odds regression for prognostic analyses. The CT classification was strongly related to outcome, with worst outcome for patients with diffuse injuries in CT class III (swelling; OR 2.50; CI 2.09-3.0) or CT class IV (shift; OR 3.03; CI 2.12-4.35). The prognosis in patients with mass lesions was better for patients with an epidural hematoma (OR 0.64; CI 0.56-0.72) and poorer for an acute subdural hematoma (OR 2.14; CI 1.87-2.45). Partial obliteration of the basal cisterns (OR 2.45; CI 1.88-3.20), tSAH (OR 2.64; CI 2.42-2.89), or midline shift (1-5 mm-OR 1.36; CI 1.09-1.68);5 mm-OR 2.20; CI 1.64-2.96) were strongly related to poorer outcome. Discrepancies were found between the scoring of basal cisterns/shift and the CT classification, indicating observer variation. These were less marked in studies that had used a central review process. Multivariable analysis indicated that individual CT characteristics added substantially to the prognostic value of the CT classification alone. We conclude that both the CT classification and individual CT characteristics are important predictors of outcome in TBI. For clinical trials, a central review process is advocated to minimize observer variability in CT assessment.

We aimed to describe and quantify the relationship between cause of injury and final outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Individual patient data (N = 8708) from eight therapeutic Phase III randomized clinical trials in moderate or severe TBI, and three TBI surveys were used to investigate the relationship between cause of injury and outcome, as assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months. Proportional odds methodology was applied to quantify the strength of the association and expressed as an odds ratio in a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed and associations with other predictive factors explored. In a univariate analysis, a strong association between the cause of injury and long-term outcome in moderate to severe TBI patients was observed, with consistent results across the studies. Road traffic accidents (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.73), assaults (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and injuries sustained during sporting or recreational activities (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.71) were all associated with better outcomes than the reference category of falls. Falls were found to be associated with an older age and with a higher incidence of mass lesions. Following adjustment for age in the analysis, the relationship between cause of injury and outcome was lost.

Abnormalities in laboratory parameters are frequent following traumatic brain injury (TBI), but few studies have investigated their predictive value. We aimed to describe and quantify the relation between laboratory parameters that are routinely determined on admission and final outcome following TBI. Individual patient data were available in the IMPACT database from six Phase III randomized controlled trials and one observational study in TBI. We studied glucose (N = 4834), sodium ( N = 5270), pH ( N = 3398), hemoglobin (Hb, N = 3875), platelet count ( N = 1629), and prothrombin time (PT; N = 840) for their associations with outcome at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]). We used logistic regression models with linear, quadratic, and restricted cubic spline functions. The strength of the associations was expressed as an unadjusted odds ratio, calculated over the shift in outcome between the 25th and 75th percentiles. Proportional odds methodology was further applied to quantify the strength of the associations across the full range of the GOS. All parameters were consistently associated with outcome in a continuous relationship: glucose and prothrombin time showed a positive linear relation to outcome (i.e., increasing values associated with poorer outcome) and Hb, platelets, and pH an inverse linear relation (i.e., low values associated with poorer outcome). Sodium demonstrated a U-shaped relation to outcome, with low levels being more strongly related to poorer outcome. Effects were strongest for increasing levels of glucose (odds ratio 1.7; 95% CI 1.54-1.83) and decreasing levels of Hb (odds ratio 0.7; CI 0.60-0.78). Higher glucose values were associated with increasing age, but on adjusted analysis, the strength of the association with outcome remained. Whether treatment of abnormal values may improve outcome needs further rigorous study.

The univariate prognostic analysis of the IMPACT database on traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses the formidable challenge of how best to summarize a highly complex set of data in a way which is accessible without being overly simplistic. In this paper, we describe and illustrate the battery of statistical methods that have been used. Boxplots, histograms, tabulations, and splines were used for initial data checking and in identifying appropriate transformations for more formal statistical modeling. Imputation techniques were used to minimize the problems associated with the analysis of incomplete data due to missing values. The associations between covariates and outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] assessed at 6 months) were expressed as odds ratios with supporting confidence intervals when the GOS was collapsed to a dichotomous scale. This was extended to use common odds ratios from proportional odds models to express associations over the full range of the GOS. Forest plots were used to illustrate the consistency of results from study to study within the IMPACT database. The overall prognostic strength of the prognostic factors was expressed as the proportion of variance explained (Nagelkerke's R(2) statistic). Many of our approaches are based on simple graphical displays of the data, but, where appropriate, we have also used methods that although established in the statistical literature are relatively novel in their application to TBI.

Outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is not only dependent on the nature and severity of injury and subsequent treatment, but also on constituent characteristics of injured individuals. We aimed to describe and quantify the relationship between demographic characteristics and six month outcome assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after TBI. Individual patient data on age (n = 8719), gender (n = 8720), race (n = 5320), and education (n = 2201) were extracted from eight therapeutic Phase III randomized clinical trials and three surveys in moderate or severe TBI, contained in the IMPACT database. The strength of prognostic effects was analyzed with binary and proportional odds regression analysis and expressed as an odds ratio. Age was analyzed as a continuous variable with spline functions, and the odds ratio calculated over the difference between the 75 th and 25 th percentiles. Associations with other predictors were explored. Increasing age was strongly related to poorer outcome (OR 2.14; 95% CI 2.00-2.28) in a continuous fashion that could be approximated by a linear function. No gender differences in outcome were found (OR: 1.01; CI 0.92-1.11), and exploratory analysis failed to show any gender/age interaction. The studies included predominantly Caucasians (83%); outcome in black patients was poorer relative to this group (OR 1.30; CI 1.09-1.56). This relationship was sustained on adjusted analyses, and requires further study into mediating factors. Higher levels of education were weakly related to a better outcome (OR: 0.70; CI 0.52-0.94). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, motor score, and pupils, the prognostic effect of race and education were sustained. We conclude that outcome following TBI is dependent on age, race, to a lesser extent on education, but not on gender.

We studied the prognostic strength of the individual components of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupil reactivity to Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 6 months post-injury. A total of 8721 moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient data from the IMPACT database on traumatic brain injury comprised the study cohort. The associations between motor score and pupil reactivity and 6-month GOS were analyzed by binary logistic regression and proportional odds methodology. The strength of prognostic effects were expressed as the unadjusted odds ratios presented for all individual studies as well as in meta-analysis. We found a consistent strong association between motor score and 6-month GOS across all studies (OR 1.74-7.48). The Eye and Verbal components were also strongly associated with GOS. In the pooled population, one or both un-reactive pupils and lower motor scores were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome (range 2.71-7.31). We also found a significant change in motor score from pre-hospital direct to study hospital enrollment ( p0.0001) and from the first in-hospital to study enrollment scores (p0.0001). Pupil reactivity was more robust between these time points. It is recommended that the study hospital enrollment GCS and pupil reactivity be used for prognostic analysis.

Object The edema associated with brain swelling after traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been thought to be vasogenic in origin, but the results of previous laboratory studies by the authors have shown that a cellular form of edema is mainly responsible for brain swelling after TBI. In this study the authors used magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques to identify the type of edema that occurs in patients with TBI. Methods Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was used to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in 44 patients with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale Score < 8) and in eight healthy volunteers. Higher ADC values have been associated with vasogenic edema, and lower ADC values with a predominantly cellular form of edema. Regional measurements of ADC in patients with focal and diffuse injury were computed. The water content of brain tissue was also assessed in absolute terms by using MR imaging to measure the percentage of water per gram of tissue. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured using stable Xe–computerized tomography (CT) studies to rule out ischemia as a cause of cellular edema. The mean ADC value in the healthy volunteers was 0.82 ± 0.05 × 10−3 mm2/second. The ADC values in the patients with diffuse brain injury without swelling were close to the mean for the healthy volunteers. In contrast, the patients with brain swelling had increased brain water content and low ADC values (mean 0.74 ± 0.05 × 10−3 mm2/second). The ADC values correlated with CT classifications. In all patients with low ADC values, the CBF values were outside the range for ischemia. Conclusions The brain swelling observed in patients with TBI appears to be predominantly cellular, as signaled by low ADC values in brain tissue with high levels of water content.

Objective: Various prognostic models have been developed to predict outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to determine the validity of six models that used baseline clinical and computed tomographic characteristics to predict mortality or unfavorable outcome at 6 months or later after severe or moderate TBI. Study Design and Setting: The validity was studied in two selected series of TBI patients enrolled in clinical trials (Tirilazad trials; n = 2,269; International Selfotel Trial; n = 409) and in two unselected series of patients consecutively admitted to participating centers (European Brain Injury Consortium [EBIC] survey; n = 796; Traumatic Coma Data Bank; n = 746). Validity was indicated by discriminative ability (AUC) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test). Results: The models varied in number of predictors (four to seven) and in development technique (two prediction trees and four logistic regression models). Discriminative ability varied widely (AUC: .61-.89), but calibration was poor for most models. Better discrimination was observed for logistic regression models compared with trees, and for models including more predictors. Further, discrimination was better when tested on unselected series that contained more heterogeneous populations. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the need for external validation of prognostic models. The satisfactory discrimination indicates that logistic regression models, developed on large samples, can be used for classifying TBI patients according to prognostic risk.

The aim of this study was to quantify the potential reduction in sample size that can be achieved by adjustment for predictors of outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) trials. We used individual patient data from seven therapeutic phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs; n = 6166) in moderate or severe TBI, and three TBI surveys (n = 2238). The primary outcome was the dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months (favorable/unfavorable). Baseline predictors of outcome considered were age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, computed tomography (CT) classification, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypoxia, hypotension, glycemia, and hemoglobin. We calculated the potential sample size reduction obtained by adjustment of a hypothetical treatment effect for one to seven predictors with logistic regression models. The distribution of predictors was more heterogeneous in surveys than in trials. Adjustment of the treatment effect for the strongest predictors (age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity) yielded a reduction in sample size of 16-23% in RCTs and 28-35% in surveys. Adjustment for seven predictors yielded a reduction of about 25% in most studies: 20-28% in RCTs and 32-39% in surveys. A major reduction in sample size can be obtained with covariate adjustment in TBI trials. Covariate adjustment for strong predictors should be incorporated in the analysis of future TBI trials.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) mortality and morbidity remains a public health challenge. Because experimental studies support an important role of bradykinin (BK) in the neurological deterioration that follows TBI, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of Anatibant (LF16- 0687Ms), a selective and potent antagonist of the BK B(2) receptor, was conducted in severe (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]8) TBI patients (n = 25) at six sites in the United States. At 8-12 h after injury (9.9 +/- 2.8 h), patients received a single subcutaneous injection of Anatibant (3.75 mg or 22.5 mg, n = 10 each) or placebo (n = 5). The primary objective was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of Anatibant; general safety, local tolerability, levels of the bradykinin metabolite BK1-5 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), intracranial pressure (ICP), and cerebral perfusion pressure were also assessed. We observed a dose-proportionality of the pharmacokinetics, Cmax, and AUC of Anatibant. V(d)/F, Cl/F, and t(1/2) were independent on the dose and protein binding was97.7%. Anatibant, administered as single subcutaneous injections of 3.75 g and 22.5 mg, was well tolerated in severe TBI patients with no unexpected clinical adverse events or biological abnormalities observed. Interestingly, plasma and CSF levels of BK1-5 were significantly and markedly increased after trauma (e.g., 34,700 +/- 35,300 fmol/mL in plasma vs. 34.9 +/- 5.6 fmol/mL previously reported for normal volunteers), supporting the use of Anatibant as a treatment of secondary brain damage. To address this issue, a dose-response trial that would investigate the effects of Anatibant on the incidence of raised ICP and on functional outcome in severe TBI patients is needed.

Object. It is well established that posttraumatic secondary ischemia contributes to poor outcome. Ion dysfunction leading to cytotoxic edema is a primary force in the formation of ischemic brain edema and is a principal component of traumatic brain swelling. Because cell swelling is the result of net ion and water movement, it is crucial to have a thorough understanding of these transient phenomena. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of secondary ischemia following traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the ability to restore ion homeostasis. Methods. Twenty-four Sprague—Dawley rats were divided into four groups of six animals each. The rats underwent transient forebrain ischemia via bilateral carotid artery occlusion combined with hypotension: 15 minutes of forebrain ischemia (Group 1); 60 minutes of forebrain ischemia (Group 2); impact acceleration/TBI (Group 3); and impact acceleration/TBI followed by 15 minutes of ischemia (Group 4). Ischemia resulted in a rapid accumulation of [K+]e: 41.94 ± 13.65 and 66.33 ± 6.63 mM, respectively, in Groups 1 and 2, with a concomitant decrease of [Na+]e: 64 ± 18 mM and 72 ± 11 mM in Groups 1 and 2. Traumatic brain injury resulted in a less severe although identical trend in ion dysfunction ([K+]e 30.42 ± 11.67 mM and [Na+]e 63 ± 33 mM). Secondary ischemia resulted in prolonged and sustained ion dysfunction with a concomitant elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP). Conclusions. Analysis of these results indicates that ischemia and TBI are sublethal in isolation; however, when TBI is associated with secondary ischemia, ion dysfunction is sustained and is associated with elevated ICP.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based guidelines for surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). Compared with the diagnostic phase, the surgical management of INPH has received less scientific attention. The quality of much of the literature concerning the surgical management has been limited by many factors. These include retrospective analysis, small patient numbers, analysis of a mixed NPH population, and sometimes a lack of detail as to what type of shunt system was used. Many earlier studies predated our current understanding of the hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunts, and therefore, the conclusions drawn may no longer be valid. METHODS: A MEDLINE and PubMed search from 1966 to the present was conducted using the following key terms: normal-pressure hydrocephalus and idiopathic adult-onset hydrocephalus. Only English-language literature in peer-reviewed journals was reviewed. The search was further limited to articles that described the method of treatment and outcome selectively for INPH patients. Finally, only studies that included 20 or more INPH patients were considered with respect to formulating the recommendations in these Guidelines (27 articles). RESULTS: For practical reasons, it is important to identify probable shunt responders diagnosed with INPH. If the patient is an acceptable candidate for anesthesia, then an INPH-specific risk-benefit analysis should be determined. In general, patients exhibiting negligible symptoms may not be suitable candidates for surgical management, given the known risks and complications associated with shunting INPH. The choice of valve type and setting should be based on empirical reasoning and a basic understanding of shunt hydrodynamics. The most conservative choice is a valve incorporating an antisiphon device, with the understanding that underdrainage (despite a low opening pressure) may occur in a small percentage of patients because of the antisiphon device. On the basis of retrospective studies, the use of an adjustable valve seems to be beneficial in the management of INPH. CONCLUSION: The treatment of INPH should not be considered lightly, given the seriousness of the potential complications. Within these limitations and the available evidence, guidelines for surgical management were developed.

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for assessing shunt outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). To date, the literature available on this topic has been marked by disparate definitions of clinical improvement, varying postoperative follow-up protocols and periods, and substantial differences in the postoperative management. Because specific criteria for defining clinical improvement are seldom reported, conclusions drawn about shunt outcome may be subjective. METHODS: A MEDLINE search back to 1966 was undertaken using the query NPH, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, shunting, shunt treatment, shunt response, outcome, and clinical outcome. The criteria for selection were studies that included INPH from 1966 to the present in which the outcome of INPH was reported in patient groups of 20 or more. RESULTS: To date, there is no standard for outcome assessment of shunt treatment in INPH. The variable improvement rates reported are not only because of different criteria for selection of patients but also because of different postoperative assessment procedures and follow-up intervals. CONCLUSION: Studies that have established fixed protocols for follow-up have shown that short- and long-term periods after shunting are determined by many factors. Whereas short-term results were more likely to be influenced by shunt-associated risks, long-term results were independent of factors inherent to the shunt procedure and shunt complications, i.e., death and morbidity related to concomitant cerebrovascular and vascular diseases. Studies have shown that beyond 1 year after surgery, these factors definitely influence the clinical effect of shunting, making the 1-year postshunt period a potential determinant of the shunt outcome. Guidelines for outcome assessment were developed on the basis of the available evidence and consensus of expert opinion.

Object. The diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) remains controversial, particularly in selecting patients for shunt insertion. The use of clinical criteria coupled with imaging studies has limited effectiveness in predicting shunt success. The goal of this prospective study was to assess the usefulness of clinical criteria together with brain imaging studies, resistance testing, and external lumbar drainage (ELD) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in determining which patients would most likely benefit from shunt surgery. Methods. One hundred fifty-one patients considered at risk for idiopathic NPH were prospectively studied according to a fixed management protocol. The clinical criterion for idiopathic NPH included ventriculomegaly demonstrated on computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging studies combined with gait disturbance, incontinence, and dementia. Subsequently, all patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic NPH underwent a lumbar tap for the measurement of CSF resistance. Following this procedure, patients were admitted to the hospital neurosurgical service for a 3-day ELD of CSF. Video assessment of gait and neuropsychological testing was conducted before and after drainage. A shunt procedure was then offered to patients who had experienced clinical improvement from ELD. Shunt outcome was assessed at 1 year postsurgery. Conclusions. Data in this report affirm that gait improvement immediately following ELD is the best prognostic indicator of a positive shunt outcome, with an accuracy of prediction greater than 90%. Furthermore, bolus resistance testing is useful as a prognostic tool, does not require hospitalization, can be performed in an outpatient setting, and has an overall accuracy of 72% in predicting successful ELD outcome. Equally important is the finding that improvement with shunt surgery is independent of age up to the ninth decade of life in patients who improved on ELD.

This study evaluates information regarding physician and patient experiences with zonisamide obtained from the early access and support for epilepsy (EASE) program. Both physicians and patients completed initiation questionnaires regarding seizure history and antiepileptic drug (AED) use. Physicians were advised to initiate zonisamide at 100 mg/day and titrate either to a clinical response or a maximum dosage of 600 mg/day. After ≥2 months of zonisamide therapy, physicians and patients were asked to complete follow-up questionnaires that included questions regarding seizure frequency, seizure severity, and quality of life. Initiation questionnaires and follow-up questionnaires were submitted by 80 physicians for 163 patients. According to these data, seizure control, functional status, and other symptoms of epilepsy were improved in 57.4% (93/162), 37.1% (59/159), and 30.6% (48/157) of patients, respectively. Physicians intended to continue zonisamide therapy in 77.4% (123/159) of patients. Ninety-six patients submitted both initiation and follow-up questionnaires. Seizure control, seizure severity, and quality of life were improved in 53.6% (45/84), 58.8% (50/85), and 62.1% (54/87) of patients, respectively. These patients, most of whom were refractory to other AEDs, generally had positive experiences with zonisamide.

The early prediction of outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important for several purposes, but no prognostic models have yet been developed with proven generalizability across different settings. The objective of this study was to develop and validate prognostic models that use information available at admission to estimate 6-month outcome after severe or moderate TBI. To this end, this study evaluated mortality and unfavorable outcome, that is, death, and vegetative or severe disability on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), at 6 months post-injury. Prospectively collected data on 2269 patients from two multi-center clinical trials were used to develop prognostic models for each outcome with logistic regression analysis. We included seven predictive characteristics-age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, computed tomography classification, and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The models were validated internally with bootstrapping techniques. External validity was determined in prospectively collected data from two relatively unselected surveys in Europe (n = 796) and in North America (n = 746). We evaluated the discriminative ability, that is, the ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Further, we determined calibration, that is, agreement between predicted and observed outcome, with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The models discriminated well in the development population (AUC 0.78-0.80). External validity was even better (AUC 0.83-0.89). Calibration was less satisfactory, with poor external validity in the North American survey (p < 0.001). Especially, observed risks were higher than predicted for poor prognosis patients. A score chart was derived from the regression models to facilitate clinical application. Relatively simple prognostic models using baseline characteristics can accurately predict 6-month outcome in patients with severe or moderate TBI. The high discriminative ability indicates the potential of this model for classifying patients according to prognostic risk.

Prompt intervention in seizure emergencies is critical to reducing morbidity and mortality risks associated with status epilepticus. To determine the need for wider education about the benefits of at-home treatment, we examined the time from seizure onset to initial treatment in a cohort of patients with epileptic seizures. The seizure database of patients admitted in the greater Richmond, Virginia, area during a 5-year period (1989-1994) was queried to extract time to seizure treatment. Records were available for 889 patients. Patients were divided into two subgroups: children (age < 16 years, 29.7% of the cohort) and adults. Time to seizure treatment varied broadly; only 41.5% of all patients received their first antiepilepsy drug within 30 minutes. Time to treatment did not significantly differ between age groups. This baseline study supports the need for patient education regarding seizure emergencies and wider availability of at-home treatment options to shorten time to seizure treatment.

The aim of this study was to develop a new rat model of diffuse brain injury (DBI) associated with acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH). In order to make this model more clinically relevant, we determined whether the varying hematoma volume, severity of DBI, or the presence of hypoxemia could influence the physiological consequence. SDH was made by an autologous blood injection, while DBI was induced using the impact acceleration model (mild, 450 g/1 m, severe, 450 g/2 m). Physiological parameters measured included intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and brain tissue water content. In the first series, 23 rats were randomized into the five following groups: Group 1, sham; Group 2, 400 (microL SDH; Group 3, SDH400 + mild DBI; Group 4, SDH400 + severe DBI; and Group 5, SDH300 + severe DBI. Results suggested that SDH300 + severe DBI (Group 5) may be the most suitable model, in which the MABP and CBF temporarily decreased during the SDH induction, but thereafter recovered to the baseline. Conversely, ICP was persistently elevated throughout the experiment. The water content was also significantly higher in both hemispheres compared to that of sham. In the second series, the animal was exposed to a hypoxemic insult (10 or 30 min) in addition to SDH300 + severe DBI (Group 6). The prolonged hypoxemia caused both a severe CBF reduction without recovery and a bilateral brain swelling, whereas the brief hypoxemia showed a gradual CBF recovery from the transient reduction and an increased water content only in the SDH side. These results suggest that these models may be potentially useful to study the combination of DBI and SDH with or without hypoxemia.

Object. The goal of this study was to characterize a new model of an epidural mass lesion in rodents by means of neurophysiological monitoring, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathological analysis. Methods. Changes in intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) values, intraparenchymal tissue partial oxygen pressure (PtiO2), and electroencephalography (EEG) activity were evaluated in the rat during controlled, epidural expansion of a latex balloon up to a maximum ICP of 60 mm Hg. The initial balloon inflation was followed by periods of sustained inflation (30 ± 1 minute) and reperfusion (180 ± 5 minutes). Histopathological analysis and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed to characterize the lesion. The time to maximum balloon expansion and the average balloon volume were highly reproducible. Alterations in EEG activity during inflation first appeared when the CPP decreased to 57 mm Hg, the LDF value to 66% of baseline values, and the PtiO2 to 12 mm Hg. During maximum compression, the CPP was reduced to 34 mm Hg, the LDF value to 40% of baseline, and the PtiO2 to 4 to 5 mm Hg. The EEG tracing was isoelectric during prolonged inflation and the values of LDF and PtiO2 decreased due to accompanying hypotonia. After reperfusion, the CPP was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) due to the elevation of ICP. Both the LDF value and EEG activity displayed incomplete restoration, whereas the value of PtiO2 returned to normal. Histological analysis and MR imaging revealed brain swelling with a midline shift and a combined cortical—subcortical ischemic lesion beyond the site of balloon compression. Conclusions. This novel model of an epidural mass lesion in rodents closely resembles the process observed in humans. Evaluation of pathophysiological and morphological changes was feasible by using neurophysiological monitoring and MR imaging.

Object. Disruption of ionic homeostasis during ischemia is a well-characterized event and is identified by a rise in the concentration of extracellular potassium [K+]e, with a concomitant reduction in the concentration of extracellular sodium [Na+]e. Results of clinical studies in which microdialysis has been used, however, have shown only modest changes in the levels of extracellular ions. The object of this study was to measure [K+]e and [Na+]e by using ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) and to compare these measurements with those obtained using the well-established method of microdialysis. Methods. Fifteen Sprague—Dawley rats were separated into three groups. Five animals were subjected to a 15-minute period of ischemia, and another five animals to a 60-minute period of ischemia; animals in both of these groups received K+-free microdialysis perfusate. The third group of five rats underwent a 60-minute period of ischemia and received a reduced-Na+ microdialysis perfusate. Transient forebrain ischemia was produced by bilateral carotid artery occlusion combined with hypotension. A custom-fabricated glass Na+ electrode and a flexible plastic K+ and reference electrodes were used to monitor extracellular ion transients. Microdialysis samples were obtained with the aid of a 2-mm microdialysis probe that was perfused with K+-free mock cerebrospinal fluid at a rate of 2 µl/minute. Baseline measurements of [K+]e and [Na+]e, obtained using ISEs, were 3.41 ± 0.09 mM and 145 ± 7.75 mM, respectively. Ischemia resulted in a rapid accumulation of [K+]e (in animals subjected to 15 minutes of ischemia, the concentration was 41.9 ± 13.7 mM; and in animals subjected to 60 minutes of ischemia, the concentration was 66.9 ± 11.5 mM), with a concomitant decrease in [Na+]e (in animals subjected to 15 minutes of ischemia, the concentration was 71.7 ± 2.9 mM; and in animals subjected to 60 minutes of ischemia, the concentration was 74.7 ± 1.9 mM). A comparison of microdialysis and ISE methods revealed that microdialysis underestimated the [K+]e changes and was insensitive to concomitant [Na+]e alterations that occur during ischemia. Conclusions. Our results indicate that the flexible ISE is a reliable and accurate tool for monitoring ionic dysfunction that accompanies brain injury.

Under the auspices of the American Brain Injury Consortium and the Joint Section of Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the authors have reviewed and formulated opinions based on the evidence on protocol design and the outcome measures used for clinical trials in patients with a severe or moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). First, in view of the heterogeneity of the population under study, the authors suggest that block randomization and stratification should always be used in the design of neurotrauma trials. Second, although the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) remains the most widely used and accepted instrument for TBI trials, the authors believe the eight-point expanded scale that has recently been designed will ultimately provide greater discrimination, and narrower categories and will ultimately prove superior for detecting more subtle changes in outcome. Furthermore, the authors recommend, in view of the profound cognitive impairment in survivors of TBI, that neuropsychological tests be explored further as an adjunct to the GOS. Future research should focus on the development of more sensitive and specific surrogate outcome measures such as magnetic resonance imaging, neurochemical, neuropsychological, and quality of life measures in order to detect a neuroprotective effect in patients with TBI.

The power of clinical trials depends mainly on the choice of the primary outcome measure, the statistical test, and the sample size. The most widely used outcome measure has been the five-category Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Contrary to intuition, we show that more categories do not necessarily increase the power of a trial and actually can decrease power. This is so for two reasons. The more categories of outcome measure used, the more the likelihood for misclassifications. The effect of 0%, 10%, and 20% misclassification rate upon power is illustrated. Misclassification rates in two completed trials are examined based on comparative overlap in GOS and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) categories. The outcome results of the "National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia" indicate that the ideal number of categories also depends upon the effect of study treatment. In the recently completed hypothermia trial, the use of a dichotomized GOS (good recovery/moderate disability versus severe disability/vegetative/dead) is shown to be more sensitive than use of three or more categories of the GOS. The results point to the importance of training study investigators who will collect the outcome data. The results also indicate that the number of categories should be carefully determined using the pilot data or the data from phase II trials.

N-Acetylaspartate (NAA) is considered a neuron-specific metabolite and its reduction a marker of neuronal loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the time course of NAA changes in varying grades of traumatic brain injury (TBI), in concert with the disturbance of energy metabolites (ATP). Since NAA is synthesized by the mitochondria, it was hypothesized that changes in NAA would follow ATP. The impact acceleration model was used to produce three grades of TBI. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into the following four groups: sham control (n = 12); moderate TBI (n = 36); severe TBI (n = 36); and severe TBI coupled with hypoxia-hypotension (n = 16). Animals were sacrificed at different time points ranging from 1 min to 120 h postinjury, and the brain was processed for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of NAA and ATP. After moderate TBI, NAA reduced gradually by 35% at 6 h and 46% at 15 h, accompanied by a 57% and 45% reduction in ATP. A spontaneous recovery of NAA to 86% of baseline at 120 h was paralleled by a restoration in ATP. In severe TBI, NAA fell suddenly and did not recover, showing critical reduction (60%) at 48 h. ATP was reduced by 70% and also did not recover. Maximum NAA and ATP decrease occurred with secondary insult (80% and 90%, respectively, at 48 h). These data show that, at 48 h post diffuse TBI, reduction of NAA is graded according to the severity of insult. NAA recovers if the degree of injury is moderate and not accompanied by secondary insult. The highly similar time course and correlation between NAA and ATP supports the notion that NAA reduction is related to energetic impairment.

Corticotrophin releasing factor has been shown in several models of tissue injury to be an effective treatment for edema. In a previous study we demonstrated this ability in two models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to assess whether human corticotrophin releasing factor (hCRF) could additionally improve motor and cognitive deficits. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomised into five groups and injured with the Impact Acceleration Model of TBI. Groups I and II received sham injury followed by treatment with either drug vehicle or 100 micrograms kg-1 hCRF respectively. Group III was injured with no treatment; Group IV animals were injured and treated with 50 micrograms kg-1 hCRF and Group V were injured and treated with 100 micrograms kg-1 hCRF. Animals were assessed both before and after injury with a battery of standardised neuropsychological tests including the Morris Water Maze, the Beam Walk Test, the Beam Balance Test and the Inclined Plane Test. Both 50 micrograms kg-1 and 100 micrograms kg-1 hCRF caused significant improvements in motor and cognitive functioning, confirming that in addition to edema-reducing properties, human corticotrophin releasing factor is also capable of improving motor and cognitive functioning. Given the beneficial experimental effects of this compound, hCRF may be a useful clinical treatment, which requires formal evaluation.

Object. The pathogenesis of traumatic brain swelling remains unclear. The generally held view is that brain swelling is caused primarily by vascular engorgement and that edema plays a relatively minor role in the swelling process. The goal of this study was to examine the roles of cerebral blood volume (CBV) and edema in traumatic brain swelling.Methods. Both brain-tissue water and CBV were measured in 76 head-injured patients, and the relative contribution of edema and blood to total brain swelling was determined. Comparable measures of brain-tissue water were obtained in 30 healthy volunteers and CBV in seven volunteers. Brain edema was measured using magnetic resonance imaging, implementing a new technique for accurate measurement of total tissue water. Measurements of CBV in a subgroup of 31 head-injured patients were based on consecutive measures of cerebral blood flow (CBF) obtained using stable xenon and calculation of mean transit time by dynamic computerized tomography scanning after a rapid bolus injection of iodinated contrast material. The mean (± standard deviation) percentage of swelling due to water was 9.37 ± 8.7%, whereas that due to blood was −0.8 ± 1.32%.Conclusions. The results of this study showed that brain edema is the major fluid component contributing to traumatic brain swelling. Moreover, CBV is reduced in proportion to CBF reduction following severe brain injury.

This study examines neuropsychological dysfunction after varying severities of the Impact Acceleration Model of diffuse traumatic brain injury. Adult rats (340 g-400 g) were divided into five groups, and exposed to varying degrees of Impact Acceleration Injury (1 m, 2 m, 2.1 m/500 g and second insult). After injury, animals were allowed to recover; acute neurological reflexes, beam walk score, beam balance score, inclined plane score, and Morris Water Maze score were then assessed at multiple time points. Injury of all severities caused significant motor and cognitive deficits. With milder injuries these effects were transient; however, with more severe injuries no recovery in function was seen. The addition of hypoxia and hypotension made a moderate injury worse than a severe injury. The acute neurological reflexes, the beam balance test and the inclined plane test distinguished between the more severely injured groups, but were affected less by mild injury. The beam walk test was sensitive to mild injury, but appeared unable to distinguish between the severe groups. The Morris Water Maze was sensitive for all injury groups, but appeared to adopt a different response profile with secondary insult. This study has for the first time characterized the degree of motor and cognitive deficits in rodents exposed to differing severities of Impact Acceleration Injury. These data confirm that the tests considered, and the Injury Model used, provide a useful system for the consideration of potential therapies which might ameliorate neuropsychological deficits in diffuse brain injury.

Object. Excessive activity of excitatory amino acids released after head trauma has been demonstrated to contribute to progressive injury in animal models and human studies. Several pharmacological agents that act as antagonists to the glutamate receptor have shown promise in limiting this progression. The efficacy of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist Selfotel (CGS 19755) was evaluated in two parallel studies of severely head injured patients, defined as patients with postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 4 to 8.Methods. A total of 693 patients were prospectively enrolled in two multicenter double-blind studies. Comparison between the treatment groups showed no significant difference with regard to demographic data, previous incidence of hypotension, and severity of injury. As the study progressed, the Safety and Monitoring Committee became concerned about possible increased deaths and serious brain-related adverse events in the treatment arm of the two head injury trials, as well as deaths in the two stroke trials being monitored concurrently. The Selfotel trials were stopped prematurely because of this concern and because an interim efficacy analysis indicated that the likelihood of demonstrating success with the agent if the studies had been completed was almost nil.Conclusions. Subsequently, more complete data analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality rates in all cases between the two treatment groups in the head injury trials. In this report the authors examine the studies in detail and discuss the potential application of the data to future trial designs.

A phase II prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial of Bradycor™, a bradykinin antagonist, was conducted at 31 centers within North America in severely brain injured patients. Patients of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 3–8 (n = 139) with at least one reactive pupil were randomized to receive either Bradycor, 3 μg/kg/min or placebo as a continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days, with the infusion beginning within 12 h of the injury. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of a continuous infusion of Bradycor (3.0 mc/kg/min) in preventing elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP). Other efficacy measures included the effect of Bradycor on the Therapy Intensity Level (TIL), mortality, and functional outcome. A secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of Bradycor in patients with severe brain injury. Randomization was carried out according to a computer generated randomization list. Patients were followed for the first 14 days of hospitalization with long-term outcome assessed at...

Object. The authors present a quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging method and propose its use for the accurate assessment of brain water in humans.Methods. With this technique, a pure T1-weighted image of a selected brain slice in a patient is generated, and the image is subsequently converted to a pure water image by means of an equation derived from a tissue relaxation model. The image intensity in the resulting water map directly yields absolute measures of water expressed in grams of water per gram of tissue at a given anatomical location. The method has been validated previously in a series of phantom experiments and in an infusion model of brain edema in cats. In this report, the authors evaluate the method by using samples of tissue harvested from patients who underwent surgery for brain tumor removal and apply the technique to a series of normal volunteers, providing average regional brain water content (fw) values for a range of tissues. Application of the method in pathological conditions such as head trauma, tumor, and hydrocephalus allows quantification of regional or global increases in fw that result from edema.Conclusions. It is now possible to obtain accurate brain water measurements with the anatomical resolution of MR imaging. This permits monitoring of the development and resolution of edema in a variety of clinical circumstances, thus enhancing understanding of the underlying pathophysiological processes.

Object. Recent animal studies demonstrate that excitatory amino acids (EAAs) play a major role in neuronal damage after brain trauma and ischemia. However, the role of EAAs in patients who have suffered severe head injury is not understood. Excess quantities of glutamate in the extracellular space may lead to uncontrolled shifts of sodium, potassium, and calcium, disrupting ionic homeostasis, which may lead to severe cell swelling and cell death. The authors evaluated the role of EEAs in human traumatic brain injury. Methods. In 80 consecutive severely head injured patients, a microdialysis probe was placed into the gray matter along with a ventriculostomy catheter or an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor for 4 days. Levels of EAAs and structural amino acids were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. Multifactorial analysis of the amino acid pattern was performed and its correlations with clinical parameters and outcome were tested. The levels of EAAs were increased up to 50 times normal in 30% of the patients and were significantly correlated to levels of structural amino acids both in each patient and across the whole group (p < 0.01). Secondary ischemic brain injury and focal contusions were most strongly associated with high EAA levels (27 ± 22 µmol/L). Sustained high ICP and poor outcome were significantly correlated to high levels of EAAs (glutamate > 20 µmol/L; p < 0.01). Conclusions. The release of EAAs is closely linked to the release of structural amino acids and may thus reflect nonspecific development of membrane micropores, rather than presynaptic neuronal vesicular exocytosis. The magnitude of EAA release in patients with focal contusions and ischemic events may be sufficient to exacerbate neuronal damage, and these patients may be the best candidates for treatment with glutamate antagonists in the future.

The most commonly used primary end point in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma is the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), usually dichotomized to favorable (good) and unfavorable (poor) outcomes. The alternative endpoints include the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) with a 31-point scale. The purpose of this study was to compare DRS and GOS using the data collected from two completed clinical trials organized by the American Brain Injury Consortium and two pharmaceutical companies. The two outcome scales were examined and compared in terms of the correlation between the two scales, sensitivity, and p values between the differences between two arms of the trials. There was no indication that the DRS was more sensitive or advantageous relative to the dichotomized or four-category GOS. In addition, the highly significant correlation between the two outcome scales (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001) could not justify the DRS as an end point. The other problems with the DRS include the difficulty of determining the clinically meaningful difference in designing trials. The study suggested that the GOS is a better primary end point than DRS.