Search

Background: Metabolite profiling of blood by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is invaluable to clinical biomarker discovery. To ensure robustness, biomarkers require validation in large cohorts and across multiple centres. However, collection procedures are known to impact on the stability of biofluids that may, in turn, degrade biomarker signals. We trialled three blood collection tubes with the aim of solving technical challenges due to preanalytical variation in blood metabolite levels that are common in cohort studies. Methods: We first investigated global NMR-based metabolite variability between biobanks, including the large-scale UK Biobank and TwinsUK biobank of the general UK population, and more targeted biobanks derived from multicentre clinical trials relating to inflammatory bowel disease. We then compared the blood metabolome of 12 healthy adult volunteers when collected into either sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate, lithium heparin, or serum blood tubes using different pre-processing parameters. Results: Preanalytical variation in the method of blood collection strongly influences metabolite composition within and between biobanks. This variability can largely be attributed to glucose and lactate. In the healthy control cohort, the fluoride oxalate collection tube prevented fluctuation in glucose and lactate levels for 24 hours at either 4 °C or room temperature (20 °C). Conclusions: Blood collection into a fluoride oxalate collection tube appears to preserve the blood metabolome with delayed processing up to 24 hours at 4 °C. This method may be considered as an alternative when rapid processing is not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Cancer survival in England lags behind most European countries, due partly to lower rates of early stage diagnosis. We report the protocol for the evaluation of a multidisciplinary diagnostic centre-based pathway for the investigation of ‘low-risk but not no-risk’ cancer symptoms called the Suspected CANcer (SCAN) pathway. SCAN is a new standard of care being implemented in Oxfordshire; one of a number of pathways implemented during the second wave of the Accelerate, Coordinate, Evaluate (ACE) programme, an initiative which aims to improve England’s cancer survival rates through establishing effective routes to early diagnosis. Methods and analysis To evaluate SCAN, we are collating a prospective database of patients referred onto the pathway by their general practitioner (GP). Patients aged over 40 years, with non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or fatigue, who do not meet urgent cancer referral criteria or for whom symptom causation remains unclear after investigation via other existing pathways, can be referred to SCAN. SCAN provides rapid CT scanning, laboratory testing and clinic review within 2 weeks. We will follow all patients in the primary and secondary care record for at least 2 years. The data will be used to understand the diagnostic yield of the SCAN pathway in the short term (28 days) and the long term (2 years). Routinely collected primary and secondary care data from patients not referred to SCAN but with similar symptoms will also be used to evaluate SCAN. We will map the routes to diagnosis for patients referred to SCAN to assess cost-effectiveness. Acceptability will be evaluated using patient and GP surveys. Ethics and dissemination The Oxford Joint Research Office Study Classification Group has judged this to be a service evaluation and so outside of research governance. The results of this project will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication and presentation at conferences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]