1. Real‐world study of the use of azacitidine in myelodysplasia in Australia
- Author
-
Anoop Enjeti, Asma Ashraf, Vincent Caillet, Arif Alam, Jonathan Silar, Harold Keer, Francesco Castaldi, and Taleisha Paine
- Subjects
azacitidine ,hypomethylating agents ,myelodysplastic syndromes ,real‐world ,survival ,Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs ,RC633-647.5 - Abstract
Abstract Hypomethylating agents are the most widely used upfront therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are not suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Australia, azacitidine was, until recently, the only approved and subsidized treatment for patients with intermediate‐2 and high‐risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and low blast acute myeloid leukemia. We analyzed prescription data to evaluate the real‐world persistence and overall survival (OS) of patients prescribed azacitidine for the first time in Australia. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who had been prescribed Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)‐listed azacitidine for the first time, between January 2016 and April 2021, was conducted using the PBS 10% dataset. Treatment persistence and OS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. The impact of the number of treatment cycles and treatment adherence on OS was also estimated. There were 351 patients in the PBS 10% dataset who initiated treatment with azacitidine. The average age (standard deviation [SD]) at azacitidine initiation was 71.9 (11.1) years and the average number (SD) of azacitidine prescriptions was 5.6 (0.2). The median persistence on azacitidine was 15.6 months, and the OS was 13.4 months. The median OS for patients who had six or more cycles of azacitidine treatment was greater compared to patients who had five or less cycles of treatment. The data from this real‐world study illustrate the unmet medical needs of patients with MDS treated with azacitidine in Australia. The majority of patients are not treated with the optimal number of cycles of azacitidine, which is negatively correlated with patient outcomes.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF