Search

Background People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) frequently experience dizziness and imbalance that may be caused by central vestibular system dysfunction. Vestibular rehabilitation may offer an approach for improving dysfunction in these people. Objective To test the efficacy of a gaze and postural stability (GPS) retraining intervention compared to a strength and endurance (SAE) intervention in PwMS. Methods About 41 PwMS, with complaints of dizziness or history of falls, were randomized to either the GPS or SAE groups. Following randomization participants completed 6-weeks of 3×/week progressive training, delivered one-on-one by a provider. Following intervention, testing was performed at the primary (6-weeks) and secondary time point (10-weeks). A restricted maximum likelihood estimation mixed effects model was used to examine changes in the primary outcome of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) between the 2 groups at the primary and secondary time point. Similar models were used to explore secondary outcomes between groups at both timepoints. Results Thirty-five people completed the study (17 GPS; 18 SAE). The change in the DHI at the primary time point was not statistically different between the GPS and SAE groups (mean difference = 2.33 [95% CI −9.18, 12.85]). However, both groups demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to 6-weeks (GPS −8.73; SAE −7.31). Similar results were observed for secondary outcomes and at the secondary timepoint. Conclusions In this sample of PwMS with complaints of dizziness or imbalance, 6-weeks of GPS training did not result in significantly greater improvements in dizziness handicap or balance compared to 6-weeks of SAE training.

Background and purpose Few tools are currently available to quantify gaze stability retraining exercises. This project examined the utility of a head-worn inertial measurement unit (IMU) to quantify head movement frequency, velocity, and amplitude during gaze stability exercises. Methods Twenty-eight individuals with multiple sclerosis and complaints of dizziness or a history of falls were randomly assigned to either a strength and aerobic exercise (SAE) or gaze and postural stability (GPS) group. During a 6-week intervention, participants wore a head-mounted IMU 3 times (early, middle, and late). For aim 1, the frequency, mean peak velocity, and mean peak amplitude of head turns during equivalent duration components of group-specific exercises were compared using general linear models. For aim 2, the progression of treatment in the GPS group was examined using general linear regression models for each outcome. Results Aim 1 revealed the GPS group demonstrated significantly greater velocity and amplitude head turns during treatment than the SAE group. The frequency of head turns did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The aim 2 analyses demonstrated that the yaw and pitch frequency of head turns significantly increased during gaze stability exercises over the 6-week intervention. Velocity and amplitude of head turns during yaw and pitch gaze stability exercises did not significantly change. Discussion and conclusions A head-worn IMU during rehabilitation distinguished between groups. Furthermore, within the GPS group, the IMU quantified the progression of the frequency of head movements during gaze stability exercises over time.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A320).

To use clinically available inertial measurement units to quantify the control of linear accelerations at the head and trunk during gait in different sensory conditions in individuals with unilateral vestibular loss.Observational study.Outpatient research laboratory.Individuals (n=13; mean age, 47.6±13.7y; 69% women) 6 weeks after vestibular schwannoma resection surgery and vestibular healthy participants (n=16; mean age, 29.7±5.9y; 56% women).Not applicable.Walking speed normalized, root mean square values of cranial-caudal, medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior directed linear accelerations at the head and the trunk while walking in 2 visual sensory conditions (eyes open and eyes closed).Linear mixed models for each root mean square value were fit on the effects of group, condition, and group by condition. The group by condition effect was used to examine the primary hypothesis that individuals with vestibular loss would experience greater change in triplanar root mean square values at the head and trunk from the eyes open to eyes closed condition compared with the vestibular healthy group. The group by condition effect was found to be significant at the head in the cranial-caudal (β=0.39; P=.002), medial-lateral (β=0.41; P.001), and anterior-posterior (β=0.43; P.001) directions. The group by condition effect was also significant in the cranial-caudal (β=0.39; P=.002), medial-lateral (β=0.39; P.001), and anterior-posterior (β=0.23; P=.002) directions at the trunk.Participants who underwent vestibular schwannoma resection were more impaired in their ability to control accelerations at the head and trunk without visual sensory information than vestibular healthy participants. These impairments were detectable using clinically available inertial measurement units.

People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) experience a wide range of symptoms that can alter function and limit activity and community participation. Symptoms including sensory changes, weakness, fatigue and others have been well documented. However, symptoms related to changes in vestibular related function, including gaze and postural stability have not been fully explored. While some recent studies have begun to provide insight into these deficits in PwMS and have explored the use of rehabilitation paradigms for their management, much remains unknown about the full extent of these deficits. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the presence of gaze and postural stability deficits in measures across the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (WHO ICF) and to examine how deficits in domains of body structure and function and activity contribute to participation level limitations.Baseline data from 41 PwMS (mean(SD) age = 53.9(11.2), 78% female) enrolled as part of a randomized clinical trial were used in this analysis. Measures of gaze and postural stability from the ICF domains of body structure and function (Vestibular ocular reflex [VOR] gain and postural sway area), activity (computerized dynamic visual acuity [cDVA] and MiniBEST test), and participation (Dizziness handicap inventory [DHI] and Activities Balance Confidence [ABC] scale) along with demographic data were used to characterize the sample. To explore relationships between ICF domains for gaze and postural stability, univariate correlations were performed between measures from each domain using Pearson's correlations. Separate multivariate regression models examined how measures from the body structure and function and activity domains contributed to the variance in the participation level outcomes. Variance explained by the models was quantified using R-squared statistic and contribution of the independent variables were quantified using the beta coefficient (p 0.05).Correlation analysis demonstrated significant relationships in the postural stability measures across domains. Specifically, between postural sway area on a firm surface and MiniBEST test score (r = -.48;p 0.01) and MiniBEST test score and ABC score (r = 0.5;p 0.01). Significant correlations were also found between the gaze stability measures of horizontal and vertical VOR gain (r = .68;p 0.001), horizontal VOR gain and dynamic visual acuity (r = .38;p = 0.02), and vertical VOR gain and dynamic visual acuity (r = .54;p 0.001). Regression models assessing postural stability, found that only the MiniBEST score significantly contributed to the variance in ABC score (p = 0.01) and the full model explained 34% of the variance in ABC score. Regression modeling of gaze stability outcomes did not produce any variable that significantly contributed to the variance in DHI score and the full model explained 18% of the variance in DHI score.PwMS in this sample demonstrated deficits in gaze and postural stability across the domains of the WHO ICF compared to past samples of PwMS and healthy cohorts. Correlation between measures in the different domains were present, but no strong relationship between measures of body structure and function, activity and participation level outcomes were observed. This lack of relationship across the domains is likely contributed to the relatively small sample size, the high level of variability observed in the outcomes, and the diverse presentation often seen in PwMS.