Search

Introduction To address midfoot instability of Charcot disease a promising intramedullary implant has recently been developed to allow for an arthrodesis of the bones of the medial foot column in an anatomic position. We report on a group of patients with Charcot arthropathy and instability at the midfoot where the Midfoot Fusion Bolt had been employed as an implant for the reconstruction of the collapsed medial foot column. Material and methods A total of 7 patients (median age 56.3 years, range 47–68) were enrolled with severe Charcot deformation at Eichenholtz stages I–II (Sanders and Frykberg types II and III). The medial column was stabilised primarily with an intramedullary rod (Midfoot Fusion Bolt) in stand-alone technique in order to reconstruct the osseous foot geometry. The bolt was inserted in a retrograde mode via the head of MTI and forwarded into the talus. Follow-up time averaged 27 months (range 9–30). Results Intraoperative plantigrade reconstruction and restoration of the anatomic foot axes of the medial column was achieved in all cases with the need for revision surgery in 6 out of 7 patients due to soft tissue problems (2 impaired wound healing, 1 postoperative haematoma, 3 early infection). Implant-associated problems were seen in one case intra-operatively with fracture of the first metatarsal shaft and two cases with implant loosening of the MFB and need for implant removal during long time follow-up. Two patients underwent lower leg amputation due to a progressive deep soft tissue infection. One patient healed uneventfully without need for revision surgery. Except for one case recurrent ulcerations were not observed, so far. Conclusion Medial column support in midfoot instability of Charcot arthropathy with a single intramedullary rod does not provide enough stability to achieve osseous fusion. MFB loosening was associated with deep infection in a majority of our cases. To prevent early loosening of the intramedullary rod and to increase rotational stability, additional implants as angular stable plates are needed at the medial column and eventually an additional stabilisation of the lateral foot column where manifest instability exists at the time of primary surgical intervention.

Background All diabetic neuroosteoarthropathy (Charcot arthropathy) treatment concepts are focused on a long-term infection-free, ulcer-free, and plantigrade sufficiently stable foot in order to avoid amputation. Reconstructive arthrodesis techniques for severe deformities are associated with high postoperative complication rates. This study reports a detailed complication analysis and provides a strategy that may help detect patients at risk for a complicated postoperative course. Methods The study comprised 43 feet in 37 patients with severe non-plantigrade or unstable Charcot deformity, Eichenholtz stages II/III (Sanders and Frykberg types II-V), who underwent reconstructive arthrodesis of the mid- and/or hindfoot. Patients were retrospectively enrolled 4.5 years postoperatively (range 1.8–11.2 years). All patients showed at least two out of five positive Pinzur high-risk criteria (immuno-compromising illnesses, large bone deformity, longstanding ulcer overlying infected bone, regional osteopenia, obesity). Follow-up included a detailed clinical analysis and radiologic assessment with emphasis on complication analysis and evaluation in accordance to the PEDIS classification system. Results Significantly lower overall complication rates, as well as re-operation, reulceration and amputation counts were found for patients with a cumulative PEDIS count below 7. For PEDIS single criteria, significantly lower overall complication rates were found for patients without signs of occlusive peripheral artery disease, an ulcer extent