Search

Background: Recommendations for the duration of antimicrobial therapy in cholangitis after successful endoscopic biliary drainage vary. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of local infectious complications in patients with acute cholangitis treated with antibiotics for 3 days or less compared with 4 days or more. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentre study in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients who received a successful biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography because of cholangitis due to common bile duct stones between 2012 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a local infectious complication within 3 months of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Secondary outcomes included Clostridioides difficile infection, total length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 426 patients with cholangitis were identified and 296 patients met all inclusion criteria. Therapy duration was ≤3 days in 137 patients (46.3%). During follow-up, 41 patients (13.9%) developed a local infectious complication. Occurrence of infectious complications did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.32). No patient developed Clostridioides difficile infection. Median hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 4–8 days) in the short antibiotic group compared with 7 days (interquartile range 5–9 days) in the long group (p = 0.03). Four (1.4%) patients died during follow-up, all were treated for ≥4 days (p = 0.13). Conclusions: Antimicrobial therapy of 3 days or less seems to be sufficient after successful biliary drainage in patients with acute cholangitis. Randomized trials should confirm our findings.

Background and Aims: Large non-pedunculated rectal polyps are most commonly resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Despite pre-procedural diagnostics, unexpected rectal cancer is incidentally encountered within the resected specimen. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic assessment and procedural characteristics of lesions with and without unexpected submucosal invasion. Methods: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial (TREND study) was performed in which patients with a non-pedunculated rectal polyp of >= 3 cm without endoscopic suspicion of invasive growth were randomized between EMR and TEM. Results: Unexpected rectal cancer was detected in 13% (27/203) of patients; 15 after EMR and 12 after TEM. Most consisted of low-risk T1 cancers (78%, n = 18). There were no differences in the diagnostic assessment between lesions with and without unexpected submucosal invasion. Diagnostic biopsies revealed similar rates of high-grade dysplasia (28%[7/25] vs 18% [26/144]). When compared with EMR of adenomas, EMR procedures of unexpected cancers had a lower success rate of submucosal lifting (60% vs 93%, P

To evaluate patient burden and preferences for MR colonography with a limited bowel preparation and automated carbon dioxide insufflation in comparison to conventional colonoscopy. Symptomatic patients were consecutively recruited to undergo MR colonography with automated carbon dioxide insufflation and a limited bowel preparation followed within four weeks by colonoscopy with a standard bowel cleansing preparation. Four questionnaires regarding burden (on a five-point scale) and preferences (on a seven-point scale) were addressed after MR colonography and colonoscopy and five weeks after colonoscopy. Ninety-nine patients (47 men, 52 women; mean age 62.3, SD 8.7) were included. None of the patients experienced severe or extreme burden from the MR colonography bowel preparation compared to 31.5% of the patients for the colonoscopy bowel preparation. Colonoscopy was rated more burdensome (25.6% severe or extreme burden) compared to MR colonography (5.2% severe or extreme burden) (P

Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) obtained with transient elastography and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) obtained with proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy with results of liver biopsy in a cohort of adult patients suspected of having nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors evaluated 55 patients suspected of having NAFLD (40 men, 15 women). Patients had a median age of 52.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43.7-57.6 years) and a median body mass index of 27.8 kg/m2 (IQR, 26.0-33.1 kg/m2). CAP and PDFF measurements were obtained on the same day, within 27 days of biopsy (IQR, 7-44 days). CAP and PDFF were compared between steatosis grades by using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Diagnostic accuracies of CAP and PDFF for grading steatosis were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Within-weeks reproducibility (CAP and PDFF) and within-session repeatability were assessed with linear regression analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of variation. Results Steatosis grades at liver biopsy were distributed as follows: S0, five patients; S1, 24 patients; S2, 17 patients; and S3, nine patients. Both PDFF and CAP helped detect histologically proven steatosis (≥S1), but PDFF showed better diagnostic accuracy than CAP in terms of the area under the ROC curve (0.99 vs 0.77, respectively; P = .0334). PDFF, but not CAP, enabled the grading of steatosis (P < .0001). For within-weeks reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient with PDFF was higher than that with CAP (0.95 vs 0.65, respectively; P = .0015); coefficients of variation were similar (19% vs 11%, P = .55). Within-session repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of variation of 4.5%. Conclusion MR spectroscopy-derived PDFF is superior to CAP in detecting and grading liver steatosis in human NAFLD. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Over the past 20 years evidence has accumulated confirming the immunomodulatory role of the appendix in ulcerative colitis (UC). This led to the idea that appendectomy might alter the clinical course of established UC. The objective of this body of research is to evaluate the short-term and medium-term efficacy of appendectomy to maintain remission in patients with UC, and to establish the acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to standard treatment.These paired phase III multicenter prospective randomised studies will include patients over 18 years of age with an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and a disease relapse within 12 months prior to randomisation. Patients need to have been medically treated until complete clinical (Mayo score3) and endoscopic (Mayo score 0 or 1) remission. Patients will then be randomised 1:1 to a control group (maintenance 5-ASA treatment, no appendectomy) or elective laparoscopic appendectomy plus maintenance treatment. The primary outcome measure is the one year cumulative UC relapse rate - defined both clinically and endoscopically as a total Mayo-score ≥5 with endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3. Secondary outcomes that will be assessed include the number of relapses per patient at 12 months, the time to first relapse, health related quality of life and treatment costs, and number of colectomies in each arm.The ACCURE and ACCURE-UK trials will provide evidence on the role and acceptability of appendectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and the effects of appendectomy on the disease course.NTR2883 ; ISRCTN56523019.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Real-time differentiation of diminutive polyps (1-5 mm) during endoscopy could replace histopathology analysis. According to guidelines, implementation of optical diagnosis into routine practice would require it to identify rectosigmoid neoplastic lesions with a negative predictive value (NPV) of more than 90%, using histologic findings as a reference, and agreement with histology-based surveillance intervals for more than 90% of cases.METHODS: We performed a prospective study with 39 endoscopists accredited to perform colonoscopies on participants with positive results from fecal immunochemical tests in the Bowel Cancer Screening Program at 13 centers in the Netherlands. Endoscopists were trained in optical diagnosis using a validated module (Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis). After meeting predefined performance thresholds in the training program, the endoscopists started a 1-year program (continuation phase) in which they performed narrow band imaging analyses during colonoscopies of participants in the screening program and predicted histological findings with confidence levels. The endoscopists were randomly assigned to groups that received feedback or no feedback on the accuracy of their predictions. Primary outcome measures were endoscopists' abilities to identify rectosigmoid neoplastic lesions (using histology as a reference) with NPVs of 90% or more, and selecting surveillance intervals that agreed with those determined by histology for at least 90% of cases.RESULTS: Of 39 endoscopists initially trained, 27 (69%) completed the training program. During the continuation phase, these 27 endoscopists performed 3144 colonoscopies in which 4504 diminutive polyps were removed. The endoscopists identified neoplastic lesions with a pooled NPV of 90.8% (95% confidence interval 88.6-92.6); their proposed surveillance intervals agreed with those determined by histologic analysis for 95.4% of cases (95% confidence interval 94.0-96.6). Findings did not differ between the group that did vs did not receive feedback. Sixteen endoscopists (59%) identified rectosigmoid neoplastic lesions with NPVs greater than 90% and selected surveillance intervals in agreement with those determined from histology for more than 90% of patients.CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study following a validated training module, we found that a selected group of endoscopists identified rectosigmoid neoplastic lesions with pooled NPVs greater than 90% and accurately selected surveillance intervals for more than 90% of patients over the course of 1 year. Providing regular interim feedback on the accuracy of neoplastic lesion prediction and surveillance interval selection did not lead to differences in those endpoints. Monitoring is suggested, as individual performance varied. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02516748; Netherland Trial Register: NTR4635.

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MR colonography using automated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) insufflation for colonic distension, with colonoscopy serving as the reference standard. Methods Ninety-eight symptomatic patients underwent MR colonography with faecal tagging and automated CO 2 insufflation. Three readers (one expert (reader 1), and two less experienced (readers 2 and 3)) evaluated the images for the presence of colorectal lesions. Bowel distension was evaluated on a 4-point scale. Results were verified with colonoscopy and histopathological analysis. Results Per-patient sensitivity for lesions ≥10 mm was 91.7% (11 of 12) (reader 1), 75.0% (9 of 12) (reader 2), and 75% (9 of 12) (reader 3). Specificity was 96.5% (82 of 85) (reader 1), 97.7% (83 of 85) (reader 2), 95.3% (81 of 85) (reader 3). Per-patient sensitivity for lesions ≥6 mm was 85.7% (18 of 21) (reader 1), 57.1% (12 of 21) (reader 2), and 57.1% (12 of 21) (reader 3). Specificity was 86.8% (66 of 76), 98.7% (75 of 76), 90.8% (69 of 76), respectively. Per-patient sensitivity for advanced neoplasia of ≥10 mm and ≥6 mm was 88.9% (8 of 9) for all readers. Specificity for ≥10 mm and ≥6 mm was 98.9% (87 of 88) (reader 1), 97.7% (86 of 88) (reader 2), 96.6% (85 of 88) (reader 3). 94.4% of the colon segments were adequate to optimal distended with dual positioning. Conclusion MR colonography can accurately detect lesions ≥10 mm, and advanced neoplasia ≥6 mm. Sufficient distension was achieved using automated CO 2 insufflation for colonic distension in MR colonography.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a frequently performed procedure worldwide with a negative perception, leading to reluctance to undergo the procedure. Perceptions could differ depending on the specific indication for the colonoscopy. AIMS: To compare patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy procedure between five different patient groups: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), familial predisposition for cancer, adenoma/carcinoma surveillance, symptoms suggestive of cancer, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: A prospective questionnaire study was carried out in two regional hospitals and two tertiary teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 797 consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy between October 2009 and June 2010, 146 (18%) IBD, 153 (19%) adenoma or carcinoma surveillance, 104 (13%) familial predisposition, 280 (35%) symptoms suggestive of cancer, and 114 (14%) IBS-like symptoms, were included. Two questionnaires were administered: one on the day of the procedure and another 6 weeks after the procedure. The main outcome measurements were embarrassment, pain, burden, most burdensome aspect, and overall level of satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients with IBD and IBS reported significantly more embarrassment and burden from the bowel preparation phase (P=0.040 and 0.018, respectively) and more pain during the colonoscopy procedure (P=0.018). This difference in pain was also observed when adjusting for volume of sedation administered, familiarity with the endoscopist, duration of the colonoscopy, or whether or not an intervention was performed. All patient groups were less satisfied with the procedure at 6 weeks than directly after the colonoscopy; they recalled more embarrassment and burden, but less pain. CONCLUSION: Patient groups, defined by indication for colonoscopy, experience the colonoscopy procedure differently.

Background Given the increasing burden on colonoscopy capacity, it has been suggested that faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results could guide surveillance colonoscopy intervals. Against this background, we have evaluated the test accuracy of single and double FIT sampling to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or advanced adenomas in an asymptomatic colonoscopy-controlled high-risk population. Methods Cohort study of asymptomatic high-risk patients (personal history of adenomas/CRC or family history of CRC), who provided one or two FITs before elective colonoscopy. Test accuracy of FIT for detection of CRC and advanced adenomas was determined (cut-off level 50 ng/ml). Results 1,041 patients provided a FIT (516 personal history of adenomas, 172 personal history of CRC and 353 family history of CRC). Five CRCs (0.5%) and 101 advanced adenomas (9.7%) were detected by colonoscopy. Single FIT sampling resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for CRC of 80%, 89%, 3% and 99.9%, respectively, and for advanced adenoma of 28%, 91%, 24% and 92%, respectively. Double FIT sampling did not result in a significantly higher sensitivity for advanced neoplasia. Simulation of multiple screening rounds indicated that sensitivity of FIT for advanced adenoma could reach 81% after 5 screening rounds. Conclusions In once-only FIT sampling before surveillance colonoscopy, 70% of advanced neoplasia were missed. A simulation approach indicates that multiple screening rounds may be more promising in detecting advanced neoplasia and could potentially alleviate endoscopic burden.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) is hampered by frequent false-positive (FP) results and thereby the risk of complications and strain on colonoscopy capacity. Hemorrhoids might be a plausible cause of FP results. OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of hemorrhoids to the frequency of FP FIT results. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis from prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five large teaching hospitals, including 1 academic hospital. PATIENTS: All subjects scheduled for elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: FIT before bowel preparation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of FP FIT results in subjects with hemorrhoids as the only relevant abnormality compared with FP FIT results in subjects with no relevant abnormalities. Logistic regression analysis to determine colonic abnormalities influencing FP results. RESULTS: In 2855 patients, 434 had positive FIT results: 213 had advanced neoplasia and 221 had FP results. In 9 individuals (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.4-6.8) with an FP FIT result, hemorrhoids were the only abnormality. In univariate unadjusted analysis, subjects with hemorrhoids as the only abnormality did not have more positive results (9/134; 6.7%) compared with subjects without any abnormalities (43/886; 4.9%; P = .396). Logistic regression identified hemorrhoids, nonadvanced polyps, and a group of miscellaneous abnormalities, all significantly influencing false positivity. Of 1000 subjects with hemorrhoids, 67 would have FP results, of whom 18 would have FP results because of hemorrhoids only. LIMITATIONS: Potential underreporting of hemorrhoids; high-risk individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhoids in individuals participating in colorectal cancer screening will probably not lead to a substantial number of false-positive test results. 01 juli 2012

Increased total serum concentrations of human neutrophil peptide-1, -2 and -3 (HNP-1, -2 and -3) have been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Owing to a recently developed and fully validated liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay, individual serum concentrations of these antimicrobial peptides were quantified to evaluate their role as serum markers in CRC. Serum was obtained from patients with indications for colonoscopy, subsequently diagnosed as normal colon or hyperplastic polyp (CON; n= 368), adenomatous polyp (AP; n = 179) or colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 69). Comparison of HNP-1, -2 and -3 concentrations between CRC and CON (130 ± 90 vs. 105 ± 80; 264 ± 140 vs. 206 ± 99 and 62 ± 56 vs. 54 ± 59 for HNP-1, -2 and -3, respectively) revealed that reported up-regulated total HNP-concentrations can be largely attributed to increased HNP-2 (P=0.0006) and HNP-1 (P=0.024) levels. Although receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses showed low specificity of the peptides for CRC and no significant changes in serum levels were observed after surgical removal of the tumor (n=23), the established differentiation between the HNP-subtypes may be particularly useful to completely elucidate the role of these antimicrobial peptides in CRC.

Sample handling can have a profound effect on serum protein profiles, challenging results obtained with archived sera under non-standardized sample collection. Here, we evaluate the influence of variations in sample handling on previous serum protein profiles for colorectal cancer (CRC) (Engwegen et al.,. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 1536–1544). Sera were prospectively obtained from individuals with an indication for colonoscopy (n = 150: 65 controls, 52 adenomatous polyps, 29 CRC, 4 unknown), as well as from normal volunteers (n = 8). Protein profiles were acquired by SELDI-TOF MS on CM10 chips at pH 5. We assessed the influence of storage temperature, type of collection tube, coagulation temperature and freeze-thaw cycles on the serum protein profile. Several peptides occurred only in samples stored at –20°C, indicating proteolytic degradation during storage. One was a previous CRC biomarker candidate, an N-terminal albumin fragment (m/z 3087), and two others complement C3f and a fragment thereof (m/z 2022 and 1863). Overall differences in protein profiles were also seen for different collection tubes, coagulation temperature and freeze-thaw cycles. However, three of five of our previously defined CRC biomarker candidates are stable to variations in the sample handling protocol, justifying their further validation in prospective studies.

Many proteins have been proposed as potential biomarkers for breast cancer. Yet, validation of their discriminative value using quantitative methods has scarcely been performed. In this study, we investigated the discriminative value of six peptides that were previously proposed to be generated by breast cancer specific exoproteases: bradykinin, des-Arg(9)-bradykinin, Hyp(3)-bradykinin, and fragments of fibrinogen alpha-chain (Fib-alpha ([605-629])), complement component 4a (C4a ([1337-1350])), and interalpha trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 (ITIH4 ([666-687])). Their absolute serum concentrations were measured with a completely validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assay (LC-MS/MS) and compared between 62 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and 62 controls matched for age and sample storage duration. Both ITIH4 ([666-687]) and des-Arg(9)-bradykinin showed statistically significantly higher median concentrations in breast cancer samples than in matched control samples. Additionally, we analyzed serum samples collected after surgical removal of the tumor, in which median ITIH4 ([666-687]) and des-Arg(9)-bradykinin concentrations were significantly decreased and not statistically significantly different from concentrations in the controls anymore. In a combined analysis, ITIH4 (666-687]) and des-Arg(9)-bradykinin independently contributed to the discrimination between cases and controls. In this study, we confirmed that the exoprotease breakdown peptides, ITIH4 (666-687]) and des-Arg(9)-bradykinin, differed between breast cancer cases and controls, supporting the potential of degradome markers for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Background Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, EMR might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, EMR appears to be associated with fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and EMR for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Methods/design Multicenter randomized trial among 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with a rectal adenoma ≥ 3 cm, located between 1–15 cm ab ano, will be randomized to a TEM- or EMR-treatment strategy. For TEM, patients will be treated under general anesthesia, adenomas will be dissected en-bloc by a full-thickness excision, and patients will be admitted to the hospital. For EMR, no or conscious sedation is used, lesions will be resected through the submucosal plane in a piecemeal fashion, and patients will be discharged from the hospital. Residual adenoma that is visible during the first surveillance endoscopy at 3 months will be removed endoscopically in both treatment strategies and is considered as part of the primary treatment. Primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with recurrence after 3 months. Secondary outcome measures are: 2) number of days not spent in hospital from initial treatment until 2 years afterwards; 3) major and minor morbidity; 4) disease specific and general quality of life; 5) anorectal function; 6) health care utilization and costs. A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of EMR against TEM for large rectal adenomas will be performed from a societal perspective with respectively the costs per recurrence free patient and the cost per quality adjusted life year as outcome measures. Based on comparable recurrence rates for TEM and EMR of 3.3% and considering an upper-limit of 10% for EMR to be non-inferior (beta-error 0.2 and one-sided alpha-error 0.05), 89 patients are needed per group. Discussion The TREND study is the first randomized trial evaluating whether TEM or EMR is more cost-effective for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Trial registration number (trialregister.nl) NTR1422

Item does not contain fulltext CONTEXT: The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-system has been implicated in colorectal tumor carcinogenesis. Although both tumor expression levels and serum concentrations of IGF-system components are related to colorectal cancer risk, it is unknown whether IGF levels in tissue and serum are correlated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine expression levels of various IGF-system components in different locations of the colorectum, and to investigate whether normal tissue IGF expression levels are correlated with serum IGF-I and IGF-II concentrations. DESIGN: Biopsies from macroscopically normal mucosa at four locations in the colorectum (ascending, transverse, sigmoid colon, and rectum) and a fasting serum sample were obtained from 48 asymptomatic patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Expression levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-IR, IGF-IIR, and IGFBP-3 messenger RNA (mRNA) in tissue were quantitatively evaluated using real-time RT-PCR. Expression of IGF-IR protein in the ascending colon and rectum tissue specimens was assessed semi-quantitatively by immunohistochemistry. Serum IGF-I and IGF-II concentrations were determined using immunometric assays. RESULTS: With the exception of IGF-IIR, mRNA levels of all the IGF-system components investigated, as well as IGF-IR protein expression, were significantly higher in the rectum compared with the ascending colon (p

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Higher circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations have been related to a greater risk of cancer. Lycopene intake is inversely associated with cancer risk, and experimental studies have shown that it may affect the IGF system, possibly through an effect on IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of an 8-wk supplementation with tomato-derived lycopene (30 mg/d) on serum concentrations of total IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3. DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover study in 40 men and 31 postmenopausal women with a family history of colorectal cancer, a personal history of colorectal adenoma, or both. RESULTS: Lycopene supplementation significantly (P = 0.01) increased serum IGFBP-1 concentrations in women (median relative difference between serum IGFBP-1 concentrations after lycopene supplementation and after placebo, 21.7%). Serum IGFBP-2 concentrations were higher in both men and women after lycopene supplementation than after placebo, but to a lesser extent (mean relative difference 8.2%; 95% CI: 0.7%, 15.6% in men and 7.8%; 95% CI: -5.0%, 20.6% in women). Total IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 concentrations were not significantly altered by lycopene supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study known to show that lycopene supplementation may increase circulating IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations. Because of high interindividual variations in IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 effects, these results should be confirmed in larger randomized intervention studies.

Background Although bacterial cholangitis is frequently mentioned as a cause of secondary sclerosing cholangitis, it appears to be extremely rare, with only one documented case ever reported. Case presentation A 48-year-old woman presented with an episode of acute biliary pancreatitis that was complicated by pancreatic abcess formation. After 3 months she had an episode of severe pyogenic (E. Coli) cholangitis that recurred over the subsequent 7 months on a further two occasions. Initially, cholangiography suggested the presence of extra-biliary intrahepatic abcesses while repeated investigations demonstrated development of multiple segmental biliary duct strictures. After maintenance antibiotic treatment was started, no episodes of cholangitis occurred over a 14-month period. Conclusions Sclerosing cholangitis can rapidly develop after an episode of bacterial cholangitis. Extra-biliary involvement of the hepatic parenchyma with abcess formation may be a risk factor for developing this rare but particularly severe complication.

Background and aims: Colonoscopy is generally perceived as invasive and burdensome. Patients frequently express dissatisfaction with the level of sedation. We aimed to compare endoscopists' and patients' views on adequacy of sedation during colonoscopy. Methods: Data were collected in the IMPROVE-study, a multicenter clinical trial assessing patients' experience during colonoscopy. A total of 1,157 consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy in 2 academic and 2 non-academic centers were asked to complete a questionnaire directly after the procedure. Depth of sedation and memory about the procedure were also assessed. Procedural data were collected by a questionnaire offered to the endoscopist. Adequacy of sedation could be scored on a 3-point scale (too little adequate too much). Results: Data on adequacy of sedation from both endoscopists and patients were available for 677 persons (40% male, median age 54, range 17 to 94). Midazolam was given in 664 (98%) procedures (mean dose 4.86mg), fentanyl or alfentanil in 470 (69%) (mean dose 0.06mg for fentanyl and 0.54mg for alfentanil)). In 468 (69%) colonoscopies both midazolam and fentanyl were administered. Depth of sedation was scored as “awake and responding to all instructions” or “responding to the majority of instructions (>50%)” in 547 procedures (81%). In 18 (3%) procedures sedation depth was scored as “responding to hardly any instruction (